Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BSCRIMINOLOGY2
Introduction
Giving gays and lesbians legal marriage rights would jeopardize the stability of
the family, a pillar of our society. Should society promote traditional values and forms of
family life? Should employees with domestic partners be eligible for benefits? Should
Should we grant gay and lesbian couples the same rights as heterosexual couples,
such as the right to marry, adopt, and receive benefits? Bautista (2017) stated that
man and a woman, and the foundation of the family, the nature, consequences, and
marriage became widely publicized due to Christianity's strong opposition, which views
it as morally wrong. Herrera (2020) also opposed to this idea of same sex marriage and
stated that, when it comes down to it, Asia's Catholic stronghold does not appear to be
ready for the next step toward total LGBTQI+ rights, particularly when it comes to same-
sex marriage. In addition to his statement, as a result, civil unions were created as a
way of legally recognizing a union between two same-sex partners with nearly all of the
rights of marriage. Civil unions, widely regarded as the first step toward same-sex
marriages, are gaining traction in the Philippines after Speaker of the House of
Representatives Pantaleon Alvarez introduced legislation in 2017 to legalize civil unions
It has come to the extent that this has been considered a problem. Being denied
the right to marry adds to the stigma of having a minority sexual identity. Lesbian and
gay couples have relationship satisfaction levels that are comparable to or higher than
living in a state where same-sex marriage is illegal can result in chronic social stress
and mental health issues. Many research studies has already been done regarding this
matter. This study will be able to answer questions relevant to the issue which may also
Body
In a study conducted by Conde (2017), it was stated that, during last year’s
presidential election campaign, Duterte said he was open to the idea of having this
legalized but he still have different views about this. In addition, the remark boosted
Duterte's popularity among lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgender (LGBT) people
and bolstered his reputation as a politician who values LGBT rights. Speaker of the
Senators Risa Hontiveros and Grace Poe supporting it. However, Senators Tito Sotto
Senate.
the Philippines is perhaps the furthest same-sex legalization has progressed in the
Philippines. According to the high court's notice, the petition to allow same-sex marriage
in the Philippines was rejected with finality because "no substantive reasons were made
to justify the reversal of the challenged decision." According to SC Clerk of Court Edgar
Aricheta in 2015, the SC will not consider any more pleadings or motions on the issue,
but the petition's denial does not mean that same-sex marriage in the Philippines is
dead. In reality, it may be the start of a new fight for the LGBTQI+ community to be able
to marry legally. In other words, legalizing same-sex marriage in the Philippines could
According to Buan (2018), the Falcis petition seeks to have the Family Code
clauses that restrict marriage to a man and woman only declared unconstitutional,
ostensibly because they violate the constitutional right to fair protection of the laws. The
plan seemed to be to fight one war at a time. Same-sex marriage will be legal until the
new anti-discrimination legislation is enacted. Given the opposition to civil unions in the
Senate, it's easy to imagine how conservative and Christian lawmakers in the
Herrera (2020) also stated that there's no denying that the Philippines'
marriages. However, in the last two decades, a number of Catholic countries have
allowed same-sex marriage. Although Pope Francis has confirmed several times that
homosexuality is not a sin and that LGBTQI+ people should be treated with compassion
rather than punishment, the Catholic Church's leader continues to oppose same-sex
marriages. Ochoa (2016) supported this statement by saying that due to the influence of
morality issue, same-sex marriage in the Philippines remains a highly contentious issue.
Conclusion
Allowing same-sex marriage in the Philippines would allow gays and lesbians to
marry the person they love while also strengthening everyone's rights. From the
standpoint of human rights, extending civil marriage to couples of the same sex
circumstances that should be considered upon allowing this to happen. There are many
people will be contradicting this idea as they may see this as an immoral act to
Christianity.
legalizing it has been made around the world. It will certainly be years before same-sex
marriage is legalized in the Philippines, but if Falcis' case has progressed this far, who
knows how far the cause will advance in 2020 and beyond. Allowing same-sex couples
to marry fit with the advancement of human rights for others, although it went against
the values of others, and this dictated their civility and how they treated same-sex
The anti-gay marriage essay should point out that profoundly rooted antipathy
orientation, result in people who have discovered their own feelings having an identity
crisis. Some people survive the hurricane, while others die, and many more suffer from
the stigma's trauma for years. Some of them despise themselves and want to "cure"
combine with unique biological capabilities. The scope of these experiences, as well as
the infinite diversity of human experience, explains why no one has yet found the
"cause" of homosexuality. This issue about the legalization of same-sex marriage in the
Philippines must be then be talk about since many are in the verge of fighting for their
equal rights. Nonetheless, this by chance must be carefully done by the Government