You are on page 1of 3

2ND SEM

Inquiries, Investigation, MODULE


and Immersion
The Research Process
Name:
Grade/Section:
Subject Teacher: MISS NATHALIE G. NOMRADO
Adviser:
CONTENT STANDARD:
The learner understands gathers and analyzes data with intellectual honesty using suitable techniques
PERFORMANCE STANDARD:
The learner forms logical conclusions, makes recommendations based on conclusions and writes and presents
a clear report.
MELC STANDARDS WRITTEN
OUTPUT
WEEK 1 – 4
Lesson 1: Create inferences and interpretations from the data gathered.
WEEK 5 – 8
Lesson 3: Draw conclusions and recommendations based on the result of the data
gathered.
TOTAL
GENERAL GUIDELINES AS LIVING FRANCISCANS
As FCICians, we guarantee Franciscan Values in our Learning Module that
symbolize our identity. We uphold and manifest the values through:
PEACE. Foster the right relationship with stakeholders to sustain a harmonious Educational environment.
RESPONSIBLE STEWARDSHIP. Develop responsibility in following correct instructions.
INTEGRITY. Learners are encouraged to honestly answer the activities in the module, additional answers from the different sources
must be cited in the reference.
COMPASSION. FCICians reach out to faraway areas to continuously educate learners.
EXCELLENCE. Learning Modules are self-paced to sustain High-Quality Education.

Dear Parents,
As partners in the educative ministry, you are encouraged to Learners’ Participation in the Distance Learning Program
cooperate in the implementation of the Distance Learning Hi students! I am glad to offer you the Self-Learning Module in Inquiries,
Environment. As Parents, you hold an important responsibility in Investigation, and Immersion. This module weighs bigger responsibilities.
guiding your learners in the learning process. Parental consent is As Learners, you are obliged to follow instructions in the module; your
placed at the end of every lesson for you to verify answers from your answers are your responsibility and ideas from the internet, or from other
learners. You will constantly be notified regarding the student’s content providers must be paraphrased, direct quoted or summarized with
progress. the reference. Sharing/posting your answers/ any part of the module is
strictly prohibited. Please submit your modules on time and if you have
We would be greatly happy to hear feedback from you. Please send questions/clarifications in the module, contact your teacher-adviser.
us messages if you have questions or clarifications in the module.
Thank you and God Bless! I would be very happy to read your responses.
Thank you and Enjoy Learning!
Senior High School
Academic Year: 2021-2022

SET B WEEK 1 – 4 Inquiries, Investigation, and Immersion MODULE 1

Name:
Grade/Section:
Subject Teacher:
Adviser:

Lesson I. Interpretation of Data


Directions: This part will be writing the result and discussing the data gathered for this research. Do not forget
the figures/charts needed to elaborate well on all the data. Use a separate sheet of paper for the results and
discussion.

Lesson II. Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendation


Directions: This part will be writing the Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendation. Use a separate sheet of
paper for the results and discussion.

NOTE: I WILL SEND A PDF FILE FOR THE GUIDELINES IN WRITING THE RESULTS AND DISCUSSION,
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATION.

REFERENCES
Textbook: Amorado, Ronnie, Boholano, Helen and Talili, Ismael. (2017). Quantitative Research A Practical
Approach for Senior High. MUTYA Publishing House Inc. 105 Engineering Road, Araneta University
Village, Malabon City.

TEACHER’S FEEDBACK:

Teacher’s Signature

MISS NATHALIE NOMBRADO


Signature

PARENTAL CONSENT

I hereby certify that I am aware of my son/daughters’ answers in this module.

Signature over printed name

Property of FCIC
Disclaimer: This document may contain copyrighted material
PLEASE DO NOT REPRODUCE
2
Senior High School
Academic Year: 2021-2022

SET B WEEK 5 – 8 Inquiries, Investigation, and Immersion MODULE 2

Name:
Grade/Section:
Subject Teacher:
Adviser:
Module 2: Performance Task
Engaging scenario
As we end this subject, writing has never been fun yet fulfilling as we finally end this semester. Since in
your Practical Research subject you were tasked to create your research to relevant issues you can observe
today, hence, you are tasked to continue up until the last chapter of research writing up until Research
Defense.
Ps. Please attach this file in passing your output.

Note: If you don’t have a printer or no access to any printing shop, you can send your
final output here at nath.nombrado@gmail.com / nathy.nombrado@gmail.com or my
messenger account Nathalie Nombrado.
Scoring Rubric
10 5 3
Criteria Fully Met Met some Expectations Did not Meet
Expectations Expectations
The research paper
The research paper is The research paper gave
describes relevant issues
essentially informative. It enough information to
observed today; however,
vividly supports the supports the objective.
it fails to emphasize the
CONTENT objective with accurate However, there are lacking
defend its objectives,
results and discussions parts in the results and
leaving the audience
that can persuade its discussions that may lead
hanging about the steps
readers. the readers confused.
that needed to be done.
Words or language make Words or language make Words or language make
MECHANICS use of advanced aspects use of minimal aspects with use of minimal aspects
with no errors found. no errors found. with few errors found.
The students showed
The paragraphs are uneven development in the
The research paper is
sufficiently developed, but material, jumping from one
logically sequenced, and
STRUCTURE AND the sequencing of the ideas idea to another while
paragraphs are
ORGANIZATION needs improvement. delivering his/her speech
well-developed while
Although, this does not resulting in some
addressing each conflict
affect the overall speech confusion from the
audience.
The student properly The student properly
acknowledges the sources, acknowledges his/her
The student submits
RESEARCH AND documenting five or more sources, documenting at
his/her bibliography with
DOCUMENTATION relevant sources that least four relevant sources,
only three entries
he/she used in his/her but two of which did not
argumentative speech follow the correct format.

Property of FCIC
Disclaimer: This document may contain copyrighted material
PLEASE DO NOT REPRODUCE
3

You might also like