When importing a large user base from an existing community, had a plan to break their signification community and their epistemology. (list of popular mythologies?) When building our own epistemology have a method of verification (community event?) Have a rule 4 function controlling infighting is important for avoiding spectacle
A Flourishing Cybernetic Rhizome
Requirements:
Natural Growth (Growth cannot be predicated on approval, if growth
requires stamping that is fine, but having the prerequisites for growth processes accessible is a need, alongside guidelines on how the processes can be subverted.) Neutral interconnectedness, giving each element of the rhizome the freedom not only to interconnect, but also to not interconnect with other aspects of the rhizome. Nuanced and particular care when it comes to moderating each element. Decentred and Localized power structure, power for a given part of the network, does not empower one in another part. Have a unifying mechanism to bring the moderation constellation into line. Have a goal of creating mythologies, structures and literatures for minor and major functions which are uniquely nuanced to any given element or interconnection of the network.
Tall Poppies and Cultivation of
Weaker Rhizomes acknowledge that this server will have a vegan bias
- don't subordinate other desired properties of the server to the vegan
bias - universal liberation is the ends, not just animal liberation. develop mechanism to amplify less common discourse.
- have tools to prevent bias and promote engagement for the
conversations which are marginalized despite the servers progressive goals.
- Bot function to encourage discourse in a generic space? Automated
paper posting in generic spaces from the least active sections? Debate prompts? Have a dualism of active discourse (pro-debate, conflict permitted) space and a community/networking space (non-debate pro-solidarity space.)
Nomadism and Activism
The server's own goal is not to platform activism The server's goal is to empower activists and encourage solidarity. The server's other goal is to fight folklore and mysticism in activism A mothership for activists. Syndicate activists to engage in digital activism
- This includes in activism in other activist platforms (like sending
feminists to ara.) Through solidarity amplify the affect of major methods of activism like media blitzes. Plurality of Forces in Intersectionality Solidarity as a goal What is solidarity and how can we achieve it?
- Can solidarity be achieved in minor lit
Balancing Minor and Major Lit
Akin to the dualism of discourse/solidarity, an additional dualism of minor literature and major literature.
- This dualism is interconnected holistically.
- This pluralism when viewed comprehensively can be understood as
the genus, or tool of categorization the subject matter that arises both of that which is initially structurally supported, and that which differentiates itself and becomes identified. Maintaining the distinction and empowering the non-dominant form when a given strand experiences an overt or problematic imbalance.
Ego, Activism and Hyper-
individualization Develop a culture around the idea of "collective utterance" and deliberately prevent self-mythologizing within the community through appeals to patriarchal semiotics (debate bro fetishism)
- The most obvious means of doing this is to have a communications
parcel which can be strategically injected into particular discourse to demonstrate the importance of activist pluralism. Having co-operation and mutual development as the grounds for the type of solidarity that the system encourages.
- How to inform users of this can be the overt systematization of book-
club and workshop like functions within the system and having a systemic bias to pluralism.
- The systemic bias can also deliberately marginalize debate discourse