Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fault Analysis in Unbalanced radial distribution system without and with Distributed
Generator
P.Tejaswi G.Sujatha
Electrical Engineering Department G.Narayanamma Institute of Technology and Science
G.Narayanamma Institute of Technology and Science Hyderabad, India
Hyderabad, India Sujathagautham08@gmail.com
Tejaswetha.011@gmail.com
Abstract— The short circuit currents are playing a vital no direct mathematical relationship between the system
role in the design of bus systems, grounding systems, condition and network topology can be established.
circuit breakers, substation equipment, rotating Distributed Generator Placement and Sizing in Unbalanced
machines and indeed in planning and operation of Radial Distribution System have been proposed in [17]
distribution system. This paper employs the unbalanced II. PROBLEM FORMULATION
three phase models to handle different short circuit
faults and is developed based on the predefined matrices Unbalanced Three Phase Line Model
of distribution systems. Two matrices BIBC and BCBV,
namely the bus injection to branch current matrix and
the branch current to bus voltage mismatch matrix,
constructed from the topological characteristics of
distribution networks, were used to resolve the power
flow solutions. In this proposed fault analysis the impact
of distributed generators will be studied, as distributed
generators are part of distribution systems. The results
of this short circuit fault analysis without DG and with
DG can be used for distribution adaptive relay
coordination.The proposed fault analysis will be Fig 1. Three phase line section model
implemented for IEEE 19 bus unbalanced distribution A 4 X 4 matrix, which consider the self and mutual
systems by using MATLAB software. coupling effects of the unbalanced three-phase line
Keywords-Unbalanced Radial Distribution System, Short section, can be formulated as
circuit faults, Faults currents, Distributed Generator
I. Introduction 𝑍𝑎𝑎 𝑍𝑎𝑏 𝑍𝑎𝑐 𝑍𝑎𝑛
𝑍 𝑍 𝑍 𝑍
𝑎𝑏𝑐𝑛
[𝑍𝑝𝑞 ]= [ 𝑏𝑎 𝑏𝑏 𝑏𝑐 𝑏𝑛 ] (1)
The real-time fault analysis is aligned towards applications 𝑍𝑐𝑎 𝑍𝑐𝑏 𝑍𝑐𝑐 𝑍𝑐𝑛
in the operation area rather than the planning analysis. A 𝑍𝑛𝑎 𝑍𝑛𝑏 𝑍𝑛𝑐 𝑍𝑛𝑛
strong and effective fault analysis program is required to After Kron’s reduction is applied, the effects of the
solve large-scale distribution networks. Most conventional neutral or ground wire are still included in this
short circuit fault analysis programs used the symmetrical model and eq (1) can be rewritten as
component method for balanced electric power networks 𝑍𝑎𝑎 𝑍𝑎𝑏 𝑍𝑎𝑐
𝑎𝑏𝑐𝑛
[1–4]. Since most distribution networks are inherently [𝑍𝑝𝑞 ]=[ 𝑍𝑏𝑎 𝑍𝑏𝑏 𝑍𝑏𝑐 ] (2)
unbalanced this method is not suited to do the distribution 𝑍𝑐𝑎 𝑍𝑐𝑏 𝑍𝑐𝑐
fault analysis due to mutual coupling between phase leads to The relation between branch voltages and branch
mutual coupling between sequence networks. Various short currents in Fig.1 can be expressed as
circuit analysis methods based on the phase coordinates 𝑉𝑝𝑎 𝑉𝑞𝑎 𝑍𝑎𝑎 𝑍𝑎𝑏 𝑍𝑎𝑐 𝐼𝑝𝑞
𝑎
A. Formulation of BIBC and BCBV Matrices By employing this method for all buses in fig 2, the
In the past, networks were evaluated by impedance relationship between bus voltages and branch
and admittance matrices. In contradiction, the work currents is changed as
required to formulate an impedance matrix is much 𝑉1 𝑉2 𝑍12 0 0 0 0 0 𝐵1
greater than that for the admittance matrix since the 𝑉1 𝑉3 𝑍12 𝑍23 0 0 0 0 𝐵2
impedance matrix has more information. With 𝑉1 𝑉4 𝑍12 𝑍23 𝑍34 0 0 0 𝐵3
respect to radial or weakly meshed structures of − = (13)
𝑉1 𝑉5 𝑍12 𝑍23 𝑍34 𝑍45 0 0 𝐵4
distribution feeders, two relationship matrices, the 𝑉1 𝑉6 𝑍12 𝑍23 0 0 𝑍36 0 𝐵5
bus-current-injection-to-branch-current matrix [𝑉1 ] [𝑉7 ] [ 𝑍12 𝑍23 0 0 𝑍36 𝑍67 ] [𝐵6 ]
(BIBC) and branch-current-to-bus-voltage matrix
(BCBV) were derived and used to interpret the The equation (13) is also written as
network. [∆𝑉] = ⟦𝐵𝐶𝐵𝑉⟧⌊𝐵⌋ (14)
A model distribution network is shown in Fig 2.
Where [BCBV] is the relating matrix among bus
voltages and branch currents
B. Algorithm for BIBC and BCBV matrices
BIBC matrix:
1. For a distribution system consists of k branches
and l bus, the dimension of BIBC matrix is k x l.
2. If a new branch current 𝐵𝑞 is added to buses 𝑝
and 𝑞, copy pth column of the BIBC matrix to the
qth column of the bus and fill a ‘1’ to the position of
the 𝑞𝑡ℎ row and 𝑞𝑡ℎ column
Repeat step 2 until all branch currents are included
Fig 2. The model of a distribution network in the BIBC matrix
BCBV matrix:
The injection of power to each bus is converted to 1. For a distribution system consists of k branches
bus current injection by the formula and l bus, the dimension of BIBC matrix is l x k.
𝑃𝑝 +𝑗𝑄𝑝 2. If the branch impedance 𝑍𝑝𝑞 is added between
𝐼𝑝 = ( ) (6) buses 𝑝 and𝑞, copy 𝑝𝑡ℎrow of the BCBV matrix to
𝑉𝑝
the 𝑞𝑡ℎ row and fill the impedance ‘ 𝑍𝑝𝑞 ’ to the
The relationship between bus currents injection and branch
position of the qth row and 𝑞𝑡ℎcolumn.
currents can be resolved by using above equation and KCL.
The branch currents in the Fig 2.can be framed based on the
Repeat step 2 until all branch impedances are
bus current injections as below
inserted in the BCBV matrix.
𝐵1 1 1 1 1 1 1 𝐼2
𝐵2 0 1 1 1 1 1 𝐼3 This algorithm can also be employed for multi
𝐵3 0 0 1 1 0 0 𝐼4
= (7) phase networks. Each phase is expressed as an
𝐵4 0 0 0 1 0 0 𝐼5 independent network and these procedures are then
𝐵5 0 0 0 0 1 1 𝐼6 applied. In a three-phase network, at first matrices
[𝐵6 ] [ 0 0 0 0 0 1 ] [𝐼7 ] are constructed for phase a, then b and at the end c,
The above equation can be written as so BIBC and BCBV matrices will be extracted
from the combination of a, b and c. Therefore, the
[𝐵] = [BIBC][𝐼] (8) numbering method for buses is identical to original
The matrix BIBC is an upper triangular matrix numbering for single-phase mode and lines
consists of 0 and 1 entries. The contribution of bus numbering form is line-to-line in expansion of buses
voltages and bus currents for bus numbers 2, 3 and numbering.This algorithm is used in fault analysis
4 is shown as of unbalanced radial distribution sytem without DG
V2=V1-B1Z12 (9) and with DG.
V3=V2-B2Z23 (10) By Combining equations (8) and (14), the relationship
V4=V3-B3Z34 (11) Among bus current injections and bus correction
By substituting the equations (9) and (10) in voltages can be written as
equation (11) then [ΔV] = [BCBV] [BIBC] [I] (15)
V4= V1-B1Z12-B2Z23-B3Z34 (12)
Fig 8. Voltage index plot for 19 bus URDS Fig 10. LG fault at 7th bus of phase-A including DG
E. Algorithm for DG placement and Sizing at 15th bus
Step 1: Run the base case unbalanced radial
distribution load flow.
Step 2: Find the voltage index at each node using
eqn. (16) by penetrating the 20%
DG value at respective node and rank the
sensitivities of all nodes in ascending order to form
priority list.
Step 3: Select the bus with lowest priority and place
DG at that bus.
Step 4: Change the size of DG in ‘‘small’’ steps and
calculate power loss for each by running
Unbalanced Radial distribution load flow.
Step 5: Store the size of DG that gives minimum Fig 11. LLG fault at 7th bus of phase-A including DG at
loss. 15th bus
Step 6: Compare the loss with the previous solution.
If loss is less than previous Solution, store this new
solution and discard previous solution.
Step 7: Repeat Step 4 to Step 6 for all buses in the
priority list.
Step 8: End
F. Voltage profile of pre-fault and post-fault
Condition of different short circuit faults of
IEEE 19 bus URDS System with DG