Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Authors/ Dalisay S. Maligalig, Rhona B. Caoli- A Ravenholt. Am Univ Field Staff Joanne Doyle
Copyright Rodriguez, Rep Asia. 1982.
Chelsea Murphy
/ Source
Arturo Martinez, Jr., and Sining https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ https://www.unicef.
or
Cuevas 12264685/ filePDF
Referenc
d No. 199 | May 2010
https://www.adb.org/
publications/education-outcomes-
philippines
Abstract This paper identifies key In the Philippines poverty and The Situation An
determinants of individual, school, pervasive malnutrition are not identifies a range of
and quality of education outcomes limited to families of deprived in the fulfilment
and examines related policies, seasonal workers. According to the children’s rights acro
strategies, and project interventions Philippine Ministry of Health, sectors in the Philipp
to recommend reforms or possible nearly 1/2 of all reported deaths It also finds dis
reorientation. Two sets of data are among infants and children disparities in child
were used: (i) data on school through age 4, and about 1/2 of progress toward me
resources and outputs from the the accelerated death rate among international
administrative reporting systems of those age 5 and younger is related development and r
the Department of Education; and to malnutrition, compounded by standards according
(ii) the 2002, 2004, and 2007 Annual diarrhea, measles, and malaria geographical loca
Poverty Indicator Surveys. Analysis which is returning to areas where it economic situation
of individual, school, and quality of once was almost eradicated. 3 gender - with girls
education outcomes showed that factors critically affect a newborn's boys from margina
although school resources such as survival prospects: the family size groups perfor
pupil–teacher ratio is a key he or she is born into; the time or significantly worse.
determinant for both individual and spacing between the mother's
school outcomes, and that per pregnancies; and the child's birth
capita miscellaneous operating and order.
other expenses are significant
factors in determining quality of
education outcome, socioeconomic
characteristics are stronger
determinants. On the basis of these
results, recommendations in the
areas of policy and programs are
discussed to help address further
deterioration, reverse the declining
trend, and/or sustain gains so far in
improving basic education system.
Objective Its main objective is to address Its overall objective is to promote It aims to shed ligh
and factors in improving basic education food security, improve the progress to
scope of system for everyone.Its main goals nutritional status of the population children's rights a
as well it to improve quality and thus improve the quality of life the country and to in
the study
education outcomes for wvery of Filipinos. future policy
children in our society programme interven
for girls and boys.
Significan Filipino parents value education as The significance of this research An Act Providing
ce one of the most important legacies paper is for us to eleminate every Stronger Deterrence
they can impart to their children. factors causing malnutrition Special protection ag
They believe that having a better especially poverty in the child abuse, exploit
education opens opportunities that Philippines that are affecting every and discrimina
would ensure a good future and children's bright future and their providing penalties f
eventually lift them out of poverty. capability to be as healthy as the violation and for o
others. purpose.
Result The results of modeling the Food security and high growth of The government
and individual, school, and quality of our economy are need to eliminate demonstrated a s
Conclusio education outcomes showed that poverty causing undernutrition or commitment
although school resources such as malnutrition.The government, improving child
n
pupil–teacher ratio is a key almost since the proclamation of situation in
determinant for both individual and 1972 martial law, has campaigned Philippines.
school outcomes, and per pupil against malnutrition. During the Despiteprogress how
MOOE is a significant factor in 1970s, the government developed many girls and
determining quality of education a major program of expanded continue to face ba
outcome, socioeconomic production with the result that rice to the full realisatio
characteristics are stronger production expanded substantially. their rights, affecting
determinants of education Even this achievement leaves the ability to survive, dev
outcomes. Children of families in average Filipino short by 300 and thrive. To
the lower-income deciles and with calories of food intake per day. It is strong economic gr
less educated household heads are not jiggering with food aid or and a comprehe
vulnerable and less likely to attend government price incentives that legal and p
school. Females have better odds of will assure that future Filipinos will framework, have
attending school than males. have enough to eat. Only a failed to translate
Working children, especially males, productive revolution of rural life improved outcomes
are less likely to attend secondary that also educates mothers to children across
school. know what makes for sound family country. A numbe
nutrition will be adequate. barriers and bottlen
are at the core of
slow progress tow
meeting children’s r
These appear to ha
cross-cutting e
negatively affecting
sectors that sup
children, and impe
the ability of
policies and program
to have a real
measurable impact
girls and boys.