1.

PROFILE

Table 1.1 Kasarian

KASARIAN FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

Lalaki 39 27.27% 2nd
Babae 100 69.93% 1st
LGBTQ 2 1.40% 3rd
No response 2 1.40% 3rd
TOTAL 143 100%
N=143
The table shows that in terms of gender, female got the highest
frequency of 100 with a percentage of 69.93%, while the LGBTQ got the
least number of frequency which is 2 with a percentage of 1.40%. As a
result, among the 143 respondents, the majority is female and the
remaining 2 or 1.40% did not respond.
Table 1.2 Civil Status
CIVIL STATUS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

Single 55 38.46% 2nd

Separated 7 4.90% 4th

Married 69 48.25% 1st

Widowed 11 7.69 3rd

No response 1 0.70% 5th

TOTAL 143 100%

N=143
 The table shows that in terms of Civil Status, Married status got the
highest frequency of 69 with a total percentage of 48.25%, while the
Separated status got the lowest frequency of 11 with a total percentage of
4.90%. As a result among all the 143 respondent, the total frequency who
didn't respond is 1 with the percentage of 0.70% that makes the Married
status majority.
Table 1.3 Relihiyon

RELIHIYON FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

Roman Catholic 135 94.41% 1st
Iglesia ni Cristo 1 0.70% 4th
Born-again 2 1.40% 3rd
Muslim 2 1.40% 3rd
Iba pa 1 0.70% 4th
Wala 2 1.40% 3rd
TOTAL 143 100.01%
N=143
The table shows that in terms of religion, Roman Catholic have the
highest frequency of 135 with a percentage of 94.41%, while Born-again
and Muslim have the same frequency of 2 with a percentage of 1.40% but
compared to Iglesia ni cristo and the others, both of them have the same
total which is the lowest frequency of 1 and a percentage of 0.70%. As a
result among all the 143 respondent, the majority is Roman Catholic while
the rest of 2 and 1.40% did not respond.
Table 1.4 Natapos na pag-aaral

NATAPOS NA FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

PAG-AARAL

Elementary 54 37.76% 1st

Sekondarya 45 31.47% 2nd

 Bokasyunal 12 8.39% 4th

Kolehiyo 23 16.08% 3rd

Post-graduate 4 2.80% 6th

Wala 5 3.50% 5th

TOTAL 143 100%

N=143
The table shows that in terms of the studies completed, elementary
got the highest frequency of 54 with a percentage of 37.76%, while the
post-graduate got the least number of frequency which is 4 with a
percentage of 2.80%. As a result, among the 143 respondents, the
majority is elementary and the remaining 5 or 3.50% did not respond.
Table 1.5 Bilang ng taon ng paninirahan sa barangay

BILANG NG FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

TAON NG
PANINIRAHAN
SA BARANGAY
0-3 taon 8 5.59% 7th
4-6 taon 10 6.99% 5th
7-10 taon 9 6.29% 6th
11-15 taon 17 11.89% 3rd
16-25 taon 14 9.79% 4th
Mahigit 25 taon 64 44.76% 1st
No response 21 14.69% 2nd
TOTAL 143 100%
N=143
The table shows that in terms of the number of years of residence
in the barangay, the residents who lives over 25 years got the highest
frequency of 64 with a percentage of 44.76%, while the residents that lives
0-3 years got the least number of frequency which is 8 with a percentage
of 5.59%. As a result, among the 143 respondents, the majority is over 25
years and the remaining 21 or 14.69% did not respond.
Table 1.6 Bahay

BAHAY FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

Sarili 119 83.22% 1st

Renta 18 12.59% 2nd

No response 6 4.20% 3rd

TOTAL 143 100.01%

N=143
The table shows that in terms of house, owned house got the
highest frequency of 119 with a percentage of 83.22%, while the
remaining respondents who did not response got the least number of
frequency which is 6 with a percentage of 4.20%. As a result, among the
143 respondent, owned house is the majority of responds of respondents
in terms of houses.
Table 1.7 Bilang ng miyembro ng pamilya

BILANG NG FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

MIYEMBRO
NG PAMILYA

1-3 28 19.58% 3rd

4-6 74 51.75% 1st
7-9 32 22.38% 2nd
10 higit pa 8 5.59% 4th
No response 1 0.70% 5th
TOTAL 143 100%
N=143
 The table shows the terms of the number of family members, family
that has 4-6 members got the highest frequency of 74 with a percentage
of 51.75%, while those with no response got the least number of
frequency which is 1 with a percentage of 0.70%. As a result, among 143
respondents, the family with 4-6 members is the majority and the
remaining 1 or 0.70% did not respond.
Table 1.8 Edad ng padre de pamilya

EDAD NG FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

PADRE DE
PAMILYA
18-24 taon 3 2.10% 7th
25-34 taon 19 13.29% 4th
35-44 taon 32 22.38% 2nd
45-54 taon 34 23.78% 1st
55-64 taon 26 18.18% 3rd
65 yrs o higit pa 15 10.49% 5th
No response 14 9.79% 6th
TOTAL 143 100.01%
N=143
The table shows that in terms of the age of the father in a family,
45-54 years of age has the highest frequency of 34 with a percentage of
23.78%. At the same time, 18-24 years of age has the lowest frequency
which is 3 with a percentage of 2.10%. This result gives the majority
respond to 45-54 years of age and the remaining 14 with a percentage of
9.79% has no response.
Table 1.9 Kabuuang kita ng pamilya

KABUUANG FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

KITA NG
PAMILYA

Less than 5,000 35 24.48% 1st

5,001 – 10,000 32 22.38% 2nd
 10,001 – 15,000 31 21.68% 3rd
15,001 – 20,000 19 13.29% 4th
20,001 – 25,000 15 10.49% 5th
Mahigit 25k 11 7.69% 6th
TOTAL 143 100.01%
N=143
The table shows that regarding to the whole income of a family,
less than 5,000 pesos has the highest frequency of 35 and a percentage
of 24.48%. While over 25,000 pesos has the least frequency which is 11
with a percentage of 7.69%. This result gives the majority respond to less
than 5,000 profit of each family earn.
Table 1.10 Pangunahing trabaho na pinagkukunan ng income

PANGUNAHING FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

TRABAHO NA
PINAGKUKUNAN
NG INCOME

Pagsasaka 1 0.70% 7th

Pagtitinda 31 21.68% 2nd
Construction 14 9.79% 4th
Manggagawa 30 20.98% 3rd
Empleyado 43 30.07% 1st
Retiro 6 4.20% 5th
Call center 1 0.70% 7th
Pensionado 2 1.40% 6th
Estudyante 1 0.70% 7th
No response 14 9.79% 4th
TOTAL 143 100.01%
N=143
 The table shows that regarding to the primary employment that is
source of income, employed respondents has the highest frequency of 43
with a percentage of 30.07%. Meanwhile, farming, Call Center and a
students have the least frequency of 1 and a percentage of 0.70%. As a
result, the majority respond to employed and the remaining 14 with a
percentage of 9.79% did not respond.

2. ECONOMIC ASPECTS

Table 2.1 Kaya niyo bang tumarbaho?

KAYA NIYO FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

BANG
TUMARBAHO?
Oo 117 81.82% 1st
Hindi 20 13.99% 2nd
No response 6 4.20% 3rd
TOTAL 143 100.01%
N=143
The table shows that in terms of the question “Kaya nyo bang
Tumarbaho?” , the answer yes has the highest frequency of 117 with a
percentage of 81.82%,while 20 respondents responded no with a
percentage of 13.99%. And the remaining respondent who did not
respond has a frequency of 6 with a percentage of 4.20%.
Table 2.2 Estado ng pagtatrabaho

ESTADO NG FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

PAGTATRABAHO

Full time 64 44.76% 1st

Part time 18 12.59% 3rd
 Not working, 8 5.59% 6th
retired

Seasonal 10 6.99% 5th

Unemployed 27 18.88% 2nd
No response 16 11.19% 4th
TOTAL 143 100%
N=143
The table shows that in terms of “Estado ng pagtatrabaho” full time
job got the highest frequency which is 64 with a percentage of 44.76%,
while Unemployed is the second highest frequency of 27 with a
percentage of 18.88%. Other respondents respond part time with a
frequency of 18 and percentage of 12.59%. But some of the respondent
did not respond with a frequency of 16 and percentage of 11.19%. The
last two responses which is seasonal got a frequency of 10 and prequency
of 6.99% and Not working, retired got the lowest frequency of 8 and
percentage of 5.59%.
Table 2.3 Kung walang trabaho, nais po ninyong mag-trabaho?

KUNG WALANG FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

TRABAHO, NAIS
PO NINYONG
MAG-TRABAHO?

Oo 95 66.43% 1st
Hindi 17 11.89% 3rd
No response 31 21.68% 2nd
TOTAL 143 100%
N=143
The table shows that in terms of the question “Kung walang
trabaho, nais nyo bang mag-trabaho?”, the answer yes has the highest
frequency of 95 whit a percentage of 66.43%. While some respondents
did not respond with a frequency of 31 with percentage of 21.68%. And
the lowest frequency is 17 that has a percentage of 11.89% who
responded no.

Table 2.4 Uwi ng pinagkakakitaan

UWI NG FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

PINAGKAKAKITAAN

Child Support 31 21.68% 2nd

Wages/Salary 62 43.36% 1st
Family/Friends 8 5.59% 4th
Kindness of strangers 0 0% 7th

Pension 3 2.1% 6th

4P’s 8 5.59% 5th
No income 10 6.99% 4th
No response 21 14.69% 3rd
TOTAL 143 100%
N=143
This table shows that in terms of the type of income, wages/salary
have the highest frequency of 62 with a percentage of 43.36% while child
support have a frequency of 31 with a percentage of 21.68%. Compared
to child support, no income have the frequency of 10 with a percentage of
6.99%. Both Family/Friends and 4P's have the frequency of 8 with a
percentage of 5.59%. While Pension have a frequency of 3 with a
percentage of 2.1% and kindness of strangers having the lowest
frequency of 0 and a percentage of 0%. The total frequency who didn't
respond is kindness of strangers having 0 frequency with 0% that gives
wages/salary the majority.
Table 2.5 Kakayanan ng kita niyong sumusuporta ng pamilya?
 KAKAYANAN NG FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING
KITA NIYONG
SUMUSUPORTA
NG PAMILYA?

Oo 111 77.62% 1st

Hindi 16 11.19% 2nd

No response 16 11.19% 2nd

TOTAL 143 100%

N=143
The table shows that in term of “Kakayanan ng Kita niyong
Sumusuporta ng Pamilya”, 111 respond yes with a percentage of 77.62%
and no having a frequency of 16 and percentage of 11.19%. As a result,
the answer yes is the majority of respond of respondents in “kakayanan ng
kita niyong sumusuporta ng pamilya”.

3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS

Table 3.1 Nagkaroon ba ng barangay ng pangkalahatang paglilinis?

NAGKAROON BA FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

NG BARANGAY NG
PANGKALAHATANG
PAGLILINIS?

Oo 134 93.71% 1st

Hindi 7 4.9% 2nd
No response 2 1.40% 3rd
TOTAL 143 100.01%
N=143
The table shows that in term of the question “Nagkaroon ba ng
barangay ng pangkalahatang paglilinis?”, majority reponds yes having a
frequency of 134 with percentage of 93.61% and no is the remaining 7
with a percentage of 4.9%.

Table 3.2 Kumakalahok ka ba sa ganitong gawain?

KUMAKALAHOK FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

KA BA SA
GANITONG
GAWAIN?
Oo 96 67.13% 1st
Hindi 47 32.87% 2nd
TOTAL 143 100%
N=143
The table shows that in terms of “Kumakalahok Ka Ba Sa Ganitong
Gawain?”, more of the respondents answered yes, having the frequency
of 96 with a percentage of 67.13%, while the rest answered no, having the
frequency of 49 with a percentage of 34.27%. As a result, among the 145
respondents, the majority answered yes and the remaining 49 or 34.27%
answered no.
Table 3.3 Mayroon ba kayong “recycling program”?

MAYROON BA FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

KAYONG
“RECYCLING
PROGRAM”?
Oo 83 58.04% 1st
Hindi 54 37.76% 2nd
No response 6 4.20% 3rd
TOTAL 143 100%
N=143
 The table shows that in terms of having a "Recyling Program",
more of the respondents answered yes, having the frequency of 83 with a
percentage of 58.04%, while the rest of answered no, having the
frequency of 54 with a percentage of 37.76%. As a result, among the 137
respondents, the majority answered yes and the remaining 54 or 37.76%
answered no.

Table 3.4 Lumalahok ka ba sa “recycling program”?

LUMALAHOK FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

KA BA SA
“RECYCLING
PROGRAM”?
Oo 65 45.45% 2nd
Hindi 73 51.05% 1st
No response 5 3.50% 3rd
TOTAL 143 100%
N=143
The table shows that in terms of joining a "Recycling Program",
more of the respondents answered no, having the highest frequency of 73
with a percentage of 51. 05%, while the respondents that had no response
got the least frequency of 5 with a percentage of 3.50%. As a result,
among the 143 respondents, more of the respondents answered no and 5
or 3.50% of the respondents did not respond.

Table 3.5 Paano niyo tinatapon ang inyong basura?

PAANO NIYO FREQUENC PERCENTAGE RANKING

ITINATAPON ANG Y
INYONG BASURA?

Sinusunog 41 28.67% 1st

Collection 31 21.68% 2nd
Segregate 18 12.59% 4th
 Tinatapon sa ilog 8 5.59% 6th

Ginagawang pataba 4 2.80% 8th

Tinatapon sa gubat 1 0.70% 9th
Sa basurahan 12 8.39% 5th
Wala 7 4.90% 7th
No response 21 14.70% 3rd
TOTAL 143 100.02%
N=143
The table shows that in terms of the way how the people dispose their
waste, the majority responded that they use fire to get rid of their waste
with a frequency of 41 and a percentage of 28.67%. While the
respondents that responds that they dispose their waste by throwing it in
the forest got the least frequency of 1 with a percentage of 0.70% and the
remaining 21 respondents did not response.

4. Community Services

Table 4.1 Paano niyo aantasan ang mga sumusunod?

PAANO NIYO EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR WEIGHTED

AANTASAN MEAN
ANG MGA
SUMUSUNOD?
Law 32 84 14 13 2.94 3
enforcement
Fire Protection 25 83 13 8 2.68 3

Emergency 41 73 16 6 2.94 3
service
Garbage 9 54 30 38 2.70 3
collection
Roads/streets 16 67 24 15 2.29 2

Environment 20 83 16 5 2.59 3

Recreation 23 69 27 4 2.69 3
activities
Draina 15 57 3 26 2.26
ge 3 2

Street 30 64 3 6 2.69
lighting 3 3

VERBAL RANKING
INTERPRETATION

Good 1st

Good 4th

Good 1st

Good 2nd

Fair 6th

Good 5th

Good 3rd

Fair 7th

Good 3rd

Good

COMP 2. 64
OSITE 3
MEAN
VALUE VERBAL
SCALE INTERPRETATION

4 Excellent

3 Good

2 Fair

1 Poor
N=143 Respondents

This table shows that among the categories, there is no one that
reach the excellent stage most of the categories are only in the good
stage such as Law enforcement, Fire Protection, Emergency service,
Garbage collection, Environment, Recreation activities and Street lighting
where the law enforcement ranges as the highest with the weighted mean
of 2.94. While the category that list as the lowest is the drainage with the
weighted mean of 2.26 and it is listed as fair.

LAW FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

ENFORCEMENT

EXCELLENT 32 22.38% 2nd

GOOD 84 58.74% 1st

FAIR 14 9.79% 3rd

POOR 13 9.09% 4th

TOTAL 143 100%

This table shows that in terms of law enforcement it is only in the

good stage with the frequency of 84 and a percentage of 58.74%.

FIRE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

PROTECTION

EXCELLENT 25 17.48% 2nd

GOOD 83 58.04% 1st

 FAIR 13 9.09% 4th

POOR 8 5.59% 5th

NO RESPONSE 14 9.79% 3rd

TOTAL 143 99.99%

This table shows that in terms of fire protection it only ranges in

good stage that has a frequency of 83 and a percentage of 58.04%

EMERGENCY FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

SERVICE

EXCELLENT 41 28.67% 2nd

GOOD 73 51.05% 1st

FAIR 16 11.19% 3rd

POOR 6 4.20% 5th

NO RESPONSE 7 4.90% 4th

TOTAL 143 100.01%

As shown in the table, it shows that in terms of emergency service

it only ranges in the good stage with the frequency of 73 and percentage
of 51.05%

GARBAGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

COLLECTION

EXCELLENT 9 6.29% 5th

GOOD 54 37.76% 1st

FAIR 30 20.98% 3rd

POOR 38 26.57% 2nd

NO RESPONSE 12 8.39% 4th

 TOTAL 143 99.99%

This table shows that in terms of garbage collection, it’s just in the
good stage with a frequency of 54 and percentage of 37.76%.

ROADS/STREETS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

EXCELLENT 16 11.19% 4th

GOOD 67 46.85% 1st

FAIR 24 16.78% 2nd

POOR 15 10.49% 5th

NO RESPONSE 21 14.69% 3rd

TOTAL 143 100%

As what stated in the table in terms of roads/street it ranges in the

good stage with a frequency of 67 and percentage of 46.85%

ENVIRONMENT FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

EXCELLENT 20 13.99% 2nd

GOOD 83 58.04% 1st

FAIR 16 11.19% 4th

POOR 5 3.50% 5th

NO RESPONSE 19 13.29% 3rd

TOTAL 143 100.01%

This table shows that in terms of the environment, it excels in the

good stage with the frequency of 83 or 53.04%

RECREATION FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

ACTIVITIES

EXCELLENT 23 16.08% 3rd

 GOOD 69 48.25% 1st

FAIR 27 18.88% 2nd

POOR 4 2.80% 5th

NO RESPONSE 20 13.99% 4th

TOTAL 143 100%

In recreation activities, it excels in the good stage with 69 as the

number of frequency and 48.25% in percentage.
DRAINAGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

EXCELLENT 15 10.49% 4th

GOOD 57 39.86% 1st

FAIR 33 23.08% 2nd

POOR 26 18.18% 3rd

NO RESPONSE 12 8.39% 5th

TOTAL 143 100%

In terms of drainage, the table shows that it excels in good stage

with 57 as the number of frequency and 39.86% as the percentage.

STREET FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANKING

LIGHTING

EXCELLENT 30 20.98% 3rd

GOOD 64 44.76% 1st

FAIR 33 23.08% 2nd

POOR 6 4.20% 5th

 NO RESPONSE 10 6.99% 4th

TOTAL 143 100.01%

This table shows the result in terms of street lighting it only ranges
in the good stage which has 64 as the number of frequency and 44.76%
as the percentage.