You are on page 1of 2

Case Study #1 Case Study #2

Target Rejection Rate ≤ 3% Target Cost / Unit


Scope Assembly Scope
Period January to March 2019 Period

Week Rejection Rate (%) Week


1 2.3% 1
2 1.9% 2
3 2.1% 3
4 2.5% 4
5 2.4% 5
6 2.7% 6
7 2.9% 7
8 3.0% 8
9 2.8% 9
10 3.1% 10
11 3.5% 11
12 4.1% 12

e at Assembly is at 4.1% since W1 to W12 versus factory Target of ≤ 3% which is a gap of 1.1%
n rate from 4.1% to ≤ 3% which is a gap of 1.1% improvement by the end of March 2019
High average cost/unit at Material X is at 6.30 Php since W1 to W12 versus factory Target of 5.00 Php which i
To decrease Cost per Unit from 6.30 Php to 5.00 Php which is a gap of 1.30 Php improvement by the end of

Low average attendace rate at packaging is


To increase attendance rate from 89
Case Study #3

5.00 Target Attendance Rate 95%


Material X Scope Packaging
October - December 2019 Period June - August 2019

Cost / Unit (Php) Week Attendance Rate (%)


4.30 1 99%
3.90 2 100%
4.50 3 97%
4.70 4 97%
4.40 5 99%
5.10 6 96%
5.50 7 93%
5.30 8 95%
5.80 9 91%
6.00 10 90%
5.90 11 92%
6.30 12 89%

W12 versus factory Target of 5.00 Php which is a gap of 1.30 Php
a gap of 1.30 Php improvement by the end of December 2019

Low average attendace rate at packaging is at 89% since W1 to W12 versus packaging Target of 95% which is a gap of 6%
To increase attendance rate from 89% to 95% which is a gap of 6% improvement by the end of August 2019

You might also like