Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In Fatigue Testing
A Short Applications Note
The potential drop technique has been in use to measure and characterise the propagation of
defects in metallic specimens for many years. It is one of the few methods that directly
measures the depth of a defect or flaw providing this penetrates the surface of the material
under test.
BACKGROUND
The potential drop technique relies Both techniques have their Pulsed or interrupted DCPD units
upon the passage of a constant current protagonists and associated eliminate thermoelectric EMFs by
through a specimen and the subsequent advantages. taking two PD measure-ments, one
measurement of the voltage generated during a current pulse and one after
across an area (usually the crack site) ACPD provides a linear increase in (i.e. at zero current). By subtracting
on the specimen. voltage with crack depth and hence one from the other, the thermo-electric
permits simpler calibrations. It is also EMFs are removed.
Two forms of the technique exist; AC theoretically more sensitive than the
potential drop (ACPD) in which small DC technique since most of the current ACPD has always suffered from the
(ca. 1 amp) alternating currents are in the specimen is confined to the effect of pick-up (voltages induced in
passed through the specimen and DC surface regions via a pheno-menon the signal lead by the current supply
potential drop (DCPD) in which large known as the skin effect. lead).
(ca. 30 amp) direct currents are used.
These properties have lead to ACPD The pick-up signal is super-imposed
The techniques essentially measure being used to measure crack depth in upon the true ACPD and can
resistance (DCPD) or impedance the field in addition to its laboratory dramatically alter measured signal
(ACPD). The change in these role. DCPD is usually confined to the magnitudes.
quantities generated by a propagating materials testing and research
defect usually results in an increase in applications and is the more Pick up is not a problem in itself
the potential drop being measured. traditional, and hence accepted, of the except for the fact that altering the
potential drop methods. position of the leads during a test will
V V
I I change the measured PD value.
The major disadvantages of the DCPD
method have been the generation of Although the influence of the AC pick-
thermoelectric EMFs at the contact up phenomenon can be reduced by
points and the poor noise performance. careful test set-up, it is also possible to
These effects have been largely electronically remove the offending
Typical DCPD and ACPD current overcome by the use of modern signal.
paths in CT specimens electronics and by pulsing the applied
currents.
FATIGUE TESTING
Both potential drop variants have extensively been used for fatigue testing by industry and
academia alike. They are now accepted as methods for the measurement of crack size by the
ASTM organisation (ref. 1).
In general, ACPD is suitable for both The rapid response of AC systems This phenomenon is often put to good
high and low frequency fatigue studies makes them ideal for high cycle use to characterise crack closure
whereas pulsed DCPD is only suitable studies. ACPD has even been used to effects but it can be problematic when
for low frequency work. obtain data during impact testing. static measurement of crack depth in
the field is performed since it causes
Modern pulsed DC systems permit the Both techniques suffer from the effect an effective underestimation of the
synchronisation of the current pulse to of crack shorting, whereby rough, crack depth.
the machine cycle waveform so that fresh crack surfaces can exhibit
measurements can be taken at, for alternative current paths that disappear Sometimes regarded as a complicating
example, peak tension. once the crack is opened after the factor, is the observed dependence of
Such operation is ideal for the study of application of a stress. both the DC and AC potential drop on
crack closure effects in metals. elastic and plastic strain.