This document outlines the steps for developing a valid performance test for employee selection: 1) perform a job analysis to identify important tasks, 2) develop testing and scoring procedures, 3) train judges, 4) standardize procedures and eliminate contaminating factors, and 5) establish independent test sections. Research has found performance tests to be universally positive and valid for predicting job performance, especially for motor skills jobs, with no adverse impact between groups. Performance tests directly assess skills through work samples but have limitations around representativeness and requiring existing KSAs.
This document outlines the steps for developing a valid performance test for employee selection: 1) perform a job analysis to identify important tasks, 2) develop testing and scoring procedures, 3) train judges, 4) standardize procedures and eliminate contaminating factors, and 5) establish independent test sections. Research has found performance tests to be universally positive and valid for predicting job performance, especially for motor skills jobs, with no adverse impact between groups. Performance tests directly assess skills through work samples but have limitations around representativeness and requiring existing KSAs.
This document outlines the steps for developing a valid performance test for employee selection: 1) perform a job analysis to identify important tasks, 2) develop testing and scoring procedures, 3) train judges, 4) standardize procedures and eliminate contaminating factors, and 5) establish independent test sections. Research has found performance tests to be universally positive and valid for predicting job performance, especially for motor skills jobs, with no adverse impact between groups. Performance tests directly assess skills through work samples but have limitations around representativeness and requiring existing KSAs.
Provide the same or identical testing conditions to all
applicants
Inform applicants of what will be scored
Develop rules for consistent grading/scoring
Train all scorers in the interpretation of scoring rules
Assessment Procedures (cont.)
• Establish Independent Test Sections
Develop the test such that an applicant’s performance on one part of the test is not closely tied to another part of the test • Eliminate Contaminating Factors Develop the test to ensure that apparatus, jargon, or other testing elements that have only a minor influence on job performance do not interfere with or limit the test performance of applicants not familiar with these elements Performance Test Effectiveness
• Research Findings
The results of using performance tests in selection have
been universally positive in affirming that the tests add to the prediction of job performance
Motor performance tests were found to be valid while
paper-and-pencil tests weren’t for the same subjects. Performance Test Effectiveness (cont.)
• Research Findings
There are no differences between demographic groups of
incumbents in either average scores on performance tests or on the percentage of applicants selected
Performance tests may have an “adverse impact” on
applicants (those without on-the-job experience) Performance (Work Sample) Tests
• What Performance Tests Do
Ask the applicant to do a representative part of the job for which he or she is being evaluated. Provide direct evidence of the applicant’s ability and skill to work on the job. • Limitations of Performance Tests Creating work samples representative of job activities Relying on the assumption that applicants already possess KSAs to complete the job behavior Costs of time, materials, and equipment required to develop and administer performance tests Other Results of Using Performance Tests
• General acceptance; few complaints about their appropriateness
• Test administrators’ time is minimized • Standardization (e.g., instructions, materials, scoring) • Test results are immediately available to both the applicant and the selection specialist • Tests can serve as realistic job previews that help reduce turnover