Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Salinity and soil nutrient deficiencies are the main factors redu-
cing plant productivity in arid and semiarid areas. Among the
essential elements, nitrogen is usually the most growth limiting
plant nutrient in saline or non-saline soils. A pot experiment
was carried out in the greenhouse to evaluate the influence of
composted manure and urea as nitrogen sources on growth and
mineral [nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium
(Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sodium (Na)] content of maize (Zea
mays L.) under different levels of salinity. Saline soils were pre-
pared from an infertile loamy-sand soil, namely masatsuchi, by
adding a mixture of Ca, Mg, and Na salt solutions with concen-
trations of 60, 110, and 160 mmolc L 1. The final salinity levels
(ECe) achieved were 4, 9, and 13 dSm 1 denoted as S1, S2, S3,
respectively; S0 denotes untreated soil. The pH of the saline
soils ranged from 7.1 to 7.4. Nitrogen was applied at four levels
189
INTRODUCTION
Soil Analysis
An infertile soil, namely masatsuchi, was used for this experiment. Based
on the Soil Survey Staff (14), this soil is classified into the great group of
Udorthents and is locally classified as a Terrestrial Regosol. The selected
properties of the soil are given in Table 1. Soil texture was determined by the
pipette method, while total carbon and nitrogen were determined by the dry
combustion method using a SumiGraph NCH-21 analyzer. Available phosphorus
was extracted with Bray’s No.1 method (15) and P content in the extract was read
from a spectrophotometer (Model U-2001, Hitachi Corp., Japan) at 710 nm.
Exchangeable cations were leached from the soil with neutral ammonium acetate,
and the contents of Ca, Mg, Na, and K were determined using an atomic
absorption spectrophotometer (Model AA-670, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan).
The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was measured according to the procedure
described by Jackson (16).
Soil Salinization
The soil was passed through 4 mm sieve and a sub-sample put aside as
untreated control (non-saline or S0). The remainder was used to prepare three
ORDER REPRINTS
Table 1. Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and Manure Used for Study
were grown in each pot. Plants were irrigated 1–2 times a day with tap water
depending on weather conditions. A basal dose of P2O5 and K2O was applied at
the rate of 100 kg ha 1 in the form of K2SO4 and KH2PO4. Data were collected
for plant height and dry matter yield. The height of each plant was taken from the
soil surface to the tip of the longest leaf on fortnightly basis. Plant shoot and root
were sampled at eight weeks. The samples collected were oven-dried (65 C) to
determine the dry matter. Thereafter, the dried samples were ground into powder
and analyzed for total N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and Na content. Total N was determined
using the SumiGraph NCH-21 analyzer, while P, K, Ca, Mg, and Na were
determined after digestion of milled samples using nitric-perchloric acid mixture.
Phosphorus was determined colorimetrically by a spectrophotometer at 710 nm.
Potassium, Ca, Mg, and Na contents were determined using an atomic absorption
spectrophotometer. Nutrient uptake of shoot was determined by multiplying
concentration by shoot dry weight. Data were statistically analyzed by using the
StatView software and means were tested using the Fisher’s LSD.
Plant Growth
Table 2. Analysis of Variance of the Influence of Salinity and Fertilizer on the Growth of
Maize
*, ***, **** indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05, < 0.001 and < 0.0001
respectively; NS indicates non-significance at p < 0.05.
ORDER REPRINTS
Figure 2. Salinity and fertilizer effect on shoot and root dry weight. Salinity levels S0,
S1, S2, and S3 indicate normal, low, moderate, and high saline soils, respectively.
interferences (23). Irrespective of salinity levels, plant grew better under urea
treatment than composted manure. The incorporation of compost did not show
a reasonable increase in dry matter production over the control. Plant height
and dry weight varied in the order: urea > urea þ manure > manure > control. A
ORDER REPRINTS
Nutrient Uptake
Table 3. Analysis of Variance of the Influence of Salinity and Fertilizer on the Nutrient
Uptake of Maize
Sources of
Variation df N P K Ca Mg Na
F-Value
Salinity 3 8.06*** 21.57**** 3.99* 44.99**** 2.92* 118.85****
(S)
Fertilizer 3 381.37**** 341.46**** 375.46**** 421.53**** 164.34**** 207.36****
(F)
S6F 9 7.38**** 6.13**** 2.87* 14.34**** 0.89NS 28.00****
*, ***, **** indicate statistical significance at p-value < 0.05, < 0.001 and < 0.0001
respectively; NS indicates non-significance at p < 0.05.
196
ORDER
REPRINTS
Figure 3. Effect of salinity and fertilizer on nutrient uptake. Salinity levels S0, S1, S2, and S3 indicate
normal, low, moderate, and high saline soil, respectively.
IRSHAD ET AL.
ORDER REPRINTS
REFERENCES
19. Mercado, B.T. The Na-Resistance of Beta Vulgaris Var. Crassa, Phaseolus
vulgaris var. Manus and Var. Valgaris and Zea mays. Protoplasma 1970, 69,
151–170.
20. Patel, P.; Wallace, A. P Fertility and Mixed Salinity on Growth and Ca, Mg,
Na, P and Cl Concentration of Tomato, Corn and Sudan Grass Grown in
Sand Culture. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1976, 7, 375–385.
21. Salim, M. Comparative Growth Responses and Ionic Relations of Four
Cereal During Salt Stress. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 1991, 66 (3), 204–209.
22. Song, J.Q.; Fujiyama, H. Ameliorative Effect of Potassium on Rice and
Tomato Subjected to Sodium Salinization. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1996, 42,
493–501.
23. Yeo, A.R. Salinity Resistance: Physiologies and Prices. Physiol. Plant.
1983, 58, 214–222.
24. Ravikovitch, S.; Yoles, D. The Influence of Phosphorus and Nitrogen on
Millet and Clover Growing in Soil Affected by Salinity. II. Plant
Composition. Plant Soil 1971, 35, 555–567.
25. Wagenet, R.J.; Rodriguez, R.R.; Campbell, W.F.; Turner, D.L. Fertilizer and
Salty Water Effects on Phaseolus. Agron. J. 1983, 75, 161–166.
26. Frota, J.N.E.; Tucker, T.C. Absorption Rates of Ammonium and Nitrate by
Red Kidney Beans Under Salt and Water Stress. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1978,
42, 753–756.
27. Luque, A.A.; Bingham, F.T. The Effect of Osmotic Potential and Specific
Ion Concentration of Nutrient Solution on Uptake and Reduction of Nitrate
by Barley Seedlings. Plant Soil 1981, 63, 227–237.
28. Pessarakli, M.; Tucker, T.C. Uptake of Nitrogen-15 by Cotton Under Salt
Stress. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1985, 49, 149–152.
29. Torres, B.C.; Bingham, F.T. Salt Tolerance of Mexican Wheats. 1. Effects of
NO3 and NaCl on Mineral Nutrition, Growth and Grain Production for Four
Wheats. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1973, 37, 711–715.
30. Sharpley, A.N.; Meisinger, J.J.; Power, J.F.; Suarez, D.L. Root Extraction of
Nutrients Associated with Long-Term Soil Management. In Advances in
Soil Science; Steward, B., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1992;
151–217.
31. Rabie, R.K.; Kumazawa, K. Effect of NaCl Salinity on Growth and
Distribution of Sodium and Some Macronutrient Elements in Soybean
Plant. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1988, 34 (3), 375–384.
32. Classen, N.E.; Wilcox, G.E. Comparative Reduction of Calcium and
Magnesium Composition of Corn Tissue by NH4-N and K Fertilization.
Agron. J. 1974, 66, 521–522.
33. Cramer, G.R.; Lauchli, A.; Polito, V.S. Displacement of Ca by Na from the
Plasmalemma of Root Cells: A Primary Response to Salt Stress. Plant
Physiol. 1985, 79, 207–211.
ORDER REPRINTS
34. Okusanya, O.T.; Ungar, I.A. The Growth and Mineral Composition of
Three Species of Spergularia as Affected by Salinity and Nutrients at High
Salinity. Am. J. Bot. 1984, 71, 439–447.
35. Francois, L.E.; Bernstein, L. Salt Tolerance of Safflower. Agron. J. 1964,
56, 38–40.
36. Nouri, A.K.H.; James, V.D.; Delno, K.; Robert, A.O. Influence of Soil
Salinity on Production of Dry Matter and Uptake and Distribution of
Nutrients in Barley and Corn. II. Corn (Zea mays L.). Agron. J. 1970, 62,
46–48.
Request Permission or Order Reprints Instantly!
Interested in copying and sharing this article? In most cases, U.S. Copyright
Law requires that you get permission from the article’s rightsholder before
using copyrighted content.
All information and materials found in this article, including but not limited
to text, trademarks, patents, logos, graphics and images (the "Materials"), are
the copyrighted works and other forms of intellectual property of Marcel
Dekker, Inc., or its licensors. All rights not expressly granted are reserved.
The Materials are for your personal use only and cannot be reformatted,
reposted, resold or distributed by electronic means or otherwise without
permission from Marcel Dekker, Inc. Marcel Dekker, Inc. grants you the
limited right to display the Materials only on your personal computer or
personal wireless device, and to copy and download single copies of such
Materials provided that any copyright, trademark or other notice appearing
on such Materials is also retained by, displayed, copied or downloaded as
part of the Materials and is not removed or obscured, and provided you do
not edit, modify, alter or enhance the Materials. Please refer to our Website
User Agreement for more details.
Order now!