Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article information:
To cite this document: Aruna Kumar Panda, (2012),"Business process outsourcing: a strategic review on Indian perspective",
Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 18 Iss: 6 pp. 876 - 897
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637151211283339
Downloaded on: 06-11-2012
References: This document contains references to 90 other documents
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by Emerald Author Access
For Authors:
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service.
Information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
With over forty years' experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a leading independent publisher of global research with impact in
business, society, public policy and education. In total, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and more than 130 book series, as
well as an extensive range of online products and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 3 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is
a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/1463-7154.htm
BPMJ
18,6 Business process outsourcing:
a strategic review on Indian
perspective
876
Aruna Kumar Panda
Department of Industrial Relations & Personnel Management (IR&PM),
Berhampur University, Berhampur, India
Abstract
Purpose – The aim of this paper is to extend a conceptual understanding of business process
outsourcing (BPO) and its prevailing practices in the background of the post-liberalized economic
scenario of India. Efforts have also been made to discuss the major work verticals of Indian ITES-BPO
industry, which further reveals the fact of its domain expertise and in-time delivery of services in a
pre-determined standard with least possible cost that has made India a BPO hub. The later part of the
study deals with an empirical SWOT-analysis that highlights the key factors that have significant
bearing to the very flourishment of this sunshine industry.
Design/methodology/approach – The data collected for the analysis are secondary in nature and
include various journals, periodicals, survey reports and on-line business reports/news. The
techniques like trend analysis and SWOT analysis in particular have been implemented for the
purpose of study.
Findings – The paper found that in addition to the growth of traditional industries, patronization of
this emerging sector is also a high necessity, looking at its socio-economic contribution to the society
on one hand and considerable amount of employment creation and income generation capabilities for
the bright mass of the country that restrict “brain drain”, on the other hand.
Originality/value – The paper describes, analyses and critiques the outsourcing industry in India
with reference to a core theory base. It is expected to be helpful in stimulating the analytical mind of
the researchers and industry practitioner of the area for scientific decision making and furthering the
research on this particular aspect of business.
Keywords Cost effective outsourcing models, BPO hub, Domain expertise, Job shifting,
Business risk mitigation, Outsourcing, India
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
In recent years, business process outsourcing (BPO) has evolved as a tremendous
business practice throughout the globe that happens to be one of the largest growth
areas in outsourcing market (TPI, 2007). Popularly, it deals with outsourcing of the
non-core, non-niche, ancillary business activities of a firm from a third party vendor for a
fee who has domain expertise and good reputation for in-time delivery of services at a
pre-determined standard (Quinn and Hilmer, 1994; Halvey and Melby, 1996; Quinn,
1999; Dayasindhu, 2004; Rouse and Corbitt, 2004; Linder, 2004). Additionally it involves
outsourcing of the infrastructure supporting the business processes, including its IT
Business Process Management
Journal
Vol. 18 No. 6, 2012
pp. 876-897 The author expresses his sincere gratitude to the Chief Editor and the respected reviewers of the
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1463-7154
journal for their kind guidance, meaningful review comments and constructive suggestions at
DOI 10.1108/14637151211283339 different phases of drafting this paper.
infrastructure, apart from IT-enabled business processes (Loh and Venkatraman, 1992; Business process
Edwards, 2004; Tornbohm and Andrault, 2005; Mani et al., 2006). Authors like outsourcing
Davenport and Short (1990) and Davenport and Davenport (1993) explained the business
process as a set of logically related tasks performed to achieve definite business
outcomes and that describes “how” the work is done rather than “what” work to be done.
It was as early as 1980s, when a couple of leading Western multinational corporations
(MNCs) started outsourcing their business activities from a low cost structure country 877
like India with the prime motto to encash the “competitive cost advantages” (Raul, 2004;
The Hindu, 2005; Mehta et al., 2006). Ideally, they established their “captives” in tier-I
Indian cities having sound infrastructural facilities and conducive business
environment with strategically favorable policy measures of the both the central and
State Governments that were essential to cater their business needs. “Delhi”, the capital,
was infact considered to be their prime destination till 1990 (Table I).
The period of 1990s was however much enchanting for Indian industries. The
concept of liberalization, privatisation and globalization (LPG) was then gradually
gaining its momentum, world wide, endorsing a paradigm shift in the world business
activities and India being no exception (Mehra, 2005). Significant liberalized policy
measures were adopted by the Union Government during this era. Most trade
restrictions were almost uprooted and rigid policies were made flexible to a greater
extent to extend a red carpet welcome for the private sector participation in
industrialization. The basic objective behind such a liberal attitude of the government
was nothing but to have a sharp check on the year long, massive erosion of profit in
major sectors operating under its direct ownership and the growing inflation rates of the
country. However, even then the government never knew that all these revitalized
activities were waiting to reap it a very sweet result in future, in the form of an emerging
highly-paid outsourcing industry called BPO.
During the late 1990s, the concept of technology-driven LPG evolved. Information
technology, telecommunication and internet altogether almost changed the existing
business practices and work timings. Technology helped the business to get access and
use necessary information and services from several geographical locations of the globe
along with the least possible cost (Bettis and Hitt, 1995; Picot et al., 1997; Sampler, 1998;
Portor, 2001). With the advent of skilled labour and cheap global communication, many
MNCs then opted to outsource their supporting activities as a major cost-cutting and
quality enhancing strategy (Globorman and Vining, 2006). Now that India is a “low cost
structure” country with manpower expertise in most non-niche, supporting activities
like customer relationship management (CRM), human resource management,
accounting, finance, information management, etc. many Western companies made
up their mind to have India as their prime destination. Infact, this outsourcing was
of major MNCs contributed around 49 percent of the revenue though their number was
less than 15 percent of the active BPOs in India. The contribution of GE Capital
International Services (GECIS) was highest followed by Dell, American Express,
e-Serve, Scope (standard chartered captive), HSBC and JP Morgan Chase (De, 2004). The
list is long enough and every day some thing new comes under the tag of this garland.
Since then, many Indian BPOs and third party players actively engaged in this high
profile sector and worked in parallel with the major Western MNCs that made it a key
investment market in the country. From the year 2001-2002 to 2007-2008, the growth
trend of the industry remained upward ensuring an overall employment opportunity
for more than 553,000 professionals in the market (Figure 2). Further the
NASSCOM-Everest Joint Report on Indian BPO industry revealed the fact that in
case of indirect employment the industry was able to engage more than 7 lakh people
across 25 countries and accounted for about 40 per cent of the 26-29 billion $US global
BPO offshore market till 2008 (The Hindu Business Line, 2008).
During the year 2003-2004, the industry experienced a higher growth rate of about
54 percent with an estimated revenue generation of 3.9 billion $US (Iqbal, 2005). Since
then, the growth rate of the BOP industry has not been much significant though the
size of export revenue has already been at its peak with around 10.5-11 billion $US for
the financial year (FY) 2008 (Figure 3). The industry grew by the least of 33.5 percent in
FY-2007 and according to NASSCOM this segment revenue should be around
30 percent in FY 2008 (www.rediff.com/money/2007/jul/12bpo1.htm).
The domestic ITES – BPO industry of India was also not on a back gear. Here the
revenue size grew up to 12 times since 2001-2002, registering an amount of 1.2 billion
$US in 2006-2007. Figure 4 shows it significantly.
A Growth trend of Indian ITES - BPOs
1,400
1,200
Trend Indices
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Financial Year
Figure 2.
A growth trend of Indian Revenue Size ($ US Billion) Employee Strength (in No.)
ITES – BPOs
Source: Table III
54
Business process
60
outsourcing
45 44
50
38
Annual Growth
40 33.5
Rate (in %)
30
30 881
20
10
0
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Figure 3.
FinancialYear Annual growth rate of
Indian ITES – BPO
Note: Growth rates of years were estimated in comparison to their previous years segment
Source: Iqbal (2005), Karnik (2005); www.rediff.com/money/2007/jul/12bpo1.htm
1.2
1.2 0.9
1
0.6
Value in $ US
(In Billions)
0.8
0.6 0.3
0.2
0.4 0.1
0.2
0 Figure 4.
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Growing domestic
Financial Years under Study segment of Indian
ITES – BPO market
Source: Karnik (2005); www.rediff.com/money/2007/jul/12bpo1.htm
The Indian IT/ITES – BPO industry has been leveraging its brand with outsourcing
the non-niche activities to most companies in the area of banking and finance, insurance,
telecom, etc. who have a huge customer base and are keen to gain a “process efficiency”
with maximum “cost control” there by making a strategic shift of some of their
supporting services where they have a lower expertise in comparison to a list of possible
outsourcing companies. The recent “NASSCOM-Everest India BPO Study Report”
revealed that traditional sectors like banking, financial and manufacturing are under
boom. The human resource BPO sector (HR BPO Sector) also has a great potential to
offer huge opportunities as it has been estimated to grab almost 33 percent of the total
outsourcing revenue (Srikanth, 2006). While there is an opportunity for around
23 percent of market share for finance sector (Karnik, 2005), over 30 percentage of the
market is still for telecom, retail, media and energy. “The Indian BPO which has shown
a 35 percent growth over the past five years, has evolved not only in size but also in terms
BPMJ of maturity – service lines, service delivery capability and foot print”, said Som Mittal,
18,6 The President, NASSCOM (www.rediff.com/money/2008/jan/29bpo.htm). The status of
top ten Indian BPOs can be presented in Table IV.
Indian BPO companies are among the best companies of the world. They have
demonstrated better management capability and scored high on customer feedback
and pre-determined demonstrable skill sets. In the words of Mr Jagdish Dalal, MD,
882 IAOP and Head of the Judge Panel that ranked “2008 Global Out sourcing 100”:
The power balances in the outsourcing industry is shifting. Global competition in
outsourcing is intensifying and that was reflected in this year’s ranking with companies from
19 Countries vying for recognition (www.rediff.com/money/2008/may/02bpo1.htm).
Skilled labour, conducive business environments, better facility of telecommunication
and internet, etc. have been the pre-requisites for the very growth and expansion of this
high-tech industry (Mehra, 2005). It is, therefore, the basic infrastructural facilities with
supportive government policy measures that allure much this industry across the
geographical locations of our country. Recently released “NASSCOM-Everest Research
India BPO Study” revealed the fact that many MNCs still prefers to stay on tier-I Indian
cities though there is a possibility of encasing an additional 20-30 percent overall cost
saving in small and rural cities (Prasad, 2008a). MNCs consider it as a long-term measure
as they need to invest much on infrastructure and training for the potential rural youth;
irrespective of gender and even after that getting an expertise over the specialized skills
necessary for high-end outsourcing jobs is a bit critical (Table V). However, at least this
could be an opportunity area for low end, voice related call center operation.
Now what has made India the prime destination of most Western MNCs to outsource
supporting activities is, in fact, a worthy question to ask when countries like
China, Malaysia, Philippines, South Africa, New Zealand, Canada, Ireland, Caribbean,
Mexico, etc. also have many thing to offer as they are most tax-friendly countries having
matured business environment and moderate skilled labour. The simple answer is the
“overall competitive cost advantage package” that India offers, taking into account
various parameters like the cost of personnel and administration, telecom and property
rental, suitable talent team, matured business environment, higher standard of
information security, appropriate time-zone differences, etc. (Babu and Jayabal, 2004;
Mehra, 2005; Pai, 2006; NASSCOM Strategic Review, 2008). Countries like the USA
1 Infosys (3)
2 TCS (6)
3 Wipro (7)
4 Genpact (9)
5 Tech Mahindra (10)
6 HCL Technology (11)
7 Mastek (16)
8 WNS Global Services (19)
9 Hexaware (22)
Table IV. 10 ExlService (26)
Top ten Indian BPOs
under world’s top 30 list Source: www.rediff.com/money/2008/may/02bpo1.htm
Business process
Classification
as per outsourcing
infrastructural Employment opportunity
facilities Name of the cities In BPO (%) In IT sector (%)
and the UK would save up to 50 percent of their manpower cost and that is too with a
pre-set high quality norm, if they manage to shift their call centers into India; research
revealed the fact. The McKinsey Report-2005 says that the giant US pharma companies
can reduce the cost of developing a new drug up to 200 million $US, more than one-third
of its developmental cost at home land, if they outsource the same development activity
to India. However, “the only Country that could be a possible threat is China and it’s
largely because of their manpower size and the government’s incentives to industry for
growing in this area”, told Mr Natarajan, then The Chairman of NASSCOM in an
interview (Prasad, 2008b).
1 Infosis Chandigarh
2 Wipro Nagpur
3 Mind Tree Consulting Bhubaneswar
4 Bhilwara Scribe Bhopal
5 Jindal Group Bellary
6 Dell Mohali Table VII.
7 HSBC Vishakapatanam Indian IT-BPOs
operating in tiers-II/III
Source: Prasad (2008a) cities
BPMJ Then a category of players like WNS, Capgemini, Aegis BPO of ESSER Group, etc.
18,6 follow rigorous training modules for their employees (Sunija and Shind, 2008).
However, one thing is pretty clear that adoption of these innovative strategies to retain
employees has not yet become a tremendous industry practice, except the cases of few
mega players.
3.4.2 A comparatively higher rate of taxation coupled with trade restrictions
890 prevailing in India. Report says, major countries like China, Philippines, South Africa,
Malaysia, Ireland, Taiwan, etc. are mostly tax-friendly when it comes to operate the BPO
industry (Raul, 2004). The heaven success in outsourcing of manufacturing segment has
made “China” a world wide threat. The pillars of success being Chinese Government’s
direct involvement in business to let the industry get a heavy relaxation in many trade
related restrictions. India is still on edge due to the “competitive cost package” it offer and it
is the US economy to derive 12-14 times more value for every single dollar invested in India
(www.outsource2india.com/why_outsource/articles/BPO_india.asp). Still most trade
restrictions prevailing in India are liable to increase the fiscal burden over many MNCs
that would ultimately compel them to quit India and move to its near competitor’s nest.
3.4.3 A fear of resistance from the developed world for job shifting to India. During
the very early of this twenty-first century, the “British Union” had started campaigns
against job shifting (Raul, 2004). Even a voice was raised in “White House” against its
major off-shoring activities especially from countries like India and China. The scenario of
growing unemployment, and therefore, the higher inflation rates in the economy of the
USA and UK had been the crux to it (Haniffa, 2003; Iqbal, 2005). So far, India has been the
main outsourcing destination for USA fulfilling its need for IT and IT-enabled services,
including KPO and LPO (Mehra, 2005). The Indian BPO players have invested a huge
amount of capital for the growth and expansion of this hi-tech industry and this pace of
investment have been accelerated to its apex since the meaningful assurance of
Mr Robert Zoellick, Trade Representative to USA[1]. Though for the time being the
industry is on a flourishing node, still a threat will always be there as the democratic
countries throughout the globe are bound to listen the voice of their people sooner or later.
3.4.4 Political instability and terrorism. A stable government in states or centre
ensures strategically sound policy measures, which is, in fact, the pre requisite for the
smooth operation, growth and expansion of any industrial concern, and the outsourcing
industry of India is no exception. However, the multiple mid-elections in various states
invariably lead to a frequent policy change in accordance with the prototype of
the new government, which would not suit the operational strategic decisions of the
major business houses, including Western MNCs. Then, a narrow-end politics has been
chronic for decades, from east to west and north to south. Regional lobbies and
unhealthy politics in the name of cast, creed, religion, hunger, poverty, etc. has almost
become a common phenomenon, everywhere. Next is the issue of terrorism. Perhaps, this
peace loving and top democratic country of the world[2] has been contaminated
with the contemptible smile of vice. The Mumbai bomb blast had almost strangled
all the humanitarian values. Human bomb attack took the precious life of the then
Prime Minister Mr Rajiv Gandhi. Suicidal attack took his mother’s life, the then
Prime Minister of India, Mrs Indira Gandhi. The recent bomb blast attacks at Jaipur
and Delhi took hundreds of life. This long list of terror got a new tag with the
most recent suicidal attack at Hotel TAJ and Meridian. Then, the cross-border
terrorism has also exceeded all the boundaries. It is suspected that many
agencies like Hizbul Mujahideen, Al Queda, LTTE, etc. have already spread their Business process
wings throughout the country. In some states, ULFA, Maoists, Nexuls, etc. have been
operating a parallel government for a long time. Perhaps, sooner or later, these risk
outsourcing
factors will compel the CEOs and COOs of major MNCs to think beyond India while
taking strategic decisions regarding establishment of their BPO hubs.
5. Conclusion
The outsourcing industry in India is in sunshine, imparting multiple growth
892 opportunities to general public. It generates a huge employment opportunity every year.
With a better pay package in comparison to the traditional sectors, it has immensely
helped the employees to garnish their standard of living. Then this industry has also
helped its client MNCs to convert their “fixed cost” into a “variable” one as per their
requirement. The very flourishing of this industry indirectly boosted other industries
like telecom, education, transport, etc. However, an increase in informal employment
that leads to an uncertain future of employees has certainly become an issue today.
Many skilled employees elope from the work place every year for the sake of higher
education, salary and health hazards as they can never envisage it as a long-term career
opportunity due to casual employment.
Many “think tanks” believe that the BPO industry in India has been hyped much
than what it really deserves. The recent Gartner estimation indicated that the total
employment in IT-enabled industry is as low as 0.1 percent out of total work force of
the country, and therefore, development of the traditional sectors like agriculture and
hard core industries is in a higher need (Reddy, 2003). The figure may be true. But, the
fault lies in the defective policy measures of the government itself rather than
patronization of this high profile industry, looking at its various contributions to the
society and economy as a whole. Even the recent economic crisis in USA followed by
the recession in India has not dampened much this sector. On the other hand, countries
like China have already emerged as recent threats to Indian BPO sector due to their
cheap manpower, tax-friendly environment and strategic policy support from the side
of government, in addition to their close working style with local clients from
industries such as manufacturing, banking and securities that further develops their
domain expertise (www.rediff.com/money/2007/jun/22bpo.htm; Prasad, 2008b). If the
controversy still persists with opposition, sooner or later, China would overtake India;
and Indian Statistical Institutions will be sheer helpless to add this least 0.1 percent of
bright professionals into their long list of unemployed Indians.
Notes
1. On 13 January 2003, while having a discussion with Mr Arun Jaitley, then the Union
Commerce and Industry Minister of India, on bilateral and multi-lateral trade issues
Mr Robert Zoellick stated to the Minister that “the USA is strongly opposed to any attempt
to legislate a ban on outsourcing to India or any other country by American companies and
will resist efforts to do so” (Haniffa, 2008).
2. India is the largest democratic country of the world (www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-
12557384). In addition, it has the second highest population of the world after China (www.
educationforallinindia.com/page133.html).
3. The Joint Research Report was titled “Nasscom-Everest India BPO Study-Roadmap
2012-Capitalizing on the Expanding BPO landscape” (www.rediff.com/money/2008/jan/
29bpo.htm).
References Business process
Adler, P.S. (2003), “Making the HR outsourcing decision”, MIT Sloan Management Review, outsourcing
Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 53-60.
Appelbaum, S.H. and Samaha, A. (2010), “Business process outsourcing: lessons from case
studies in India, Poland and Canada”, International Journal of Management and Strategy,
Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 37-54.
Arora, R. (2005), “Maturing of Indian BPO industry”, Yojana, Vol. 49, October, pp. 25-6. 893
Babu, T.D. and Jayabal, G. (2004), “Business process outsourcing”, Facts for You, February,
pp. 34-5.
Bettis, R.A. and Hitt, M.A. (1995), “The new competitive landscape”, Strategic Management
Journal, Vol. 16, Summer, pp. 7-19 (special issue).
Business Standard (2005), “Quitters plague BPO units”, Business Standard, 15 March, available
at: www.business-standard.com/india/news/quitters-plague-bpo-units/205462/ (accessed
26 December 2011).
Conklin, D.W. (2005), “Risks and rewards in HR business process outsourcing”, Long Range
Planning (International Journal of Strategic Management), Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 579-98.
Das, S. (2004), “Mature, growing, captives”, Data Quest, available at: http://dqindia.ciol.com/
dqtop20/2004/artdisp.asp?artid¼61067 (accessed 10 February 2009).
Davenport, T.H. and Davenport, T.H. (1993), Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through
Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Davenport, T.H. and Short, J. (1990), “The new industrial engineering: information technology
and business process redesign”, MIT Slone Management Review, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 11-17.
Dayasindhu, N. (2004), “Information technology enabled process outsourcing and reengineering:
case study of a Mortgage Bank”, paper presented at the American Conference on
Information Systems, New York, NY, USA.
De, R. (2004), “BPO growth all the way, despite the backlash”, Data Quest, 21 July,
available at: http://dqindia.ciol.com/content/dqtop202k4/giants/2004/104072101.asp
(accessed 28 September 2011).
Dunning, J.H. (1988), Explaining International Production, Unwin Hyman, London.
(The) Economic Times Intelligence Group (2002), Report on India’s Rural Economy, available at:
www.etintelligence.com/etig/knowledgeshoppe/bpoIndustry.jsp (accessed 12 February 2009).
Edwards, B. (2004), “A world of work”, Economist, 13 November, pp. 3-16.
Elmuti, D. and Kathawala, Y. (2000), “The effects of global outsourcing strategies on
participants’ attitudes and organizational effectiveness”, International Journal of
Manpower, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 112-28.
Fenny, D., Lacity, M.C. and Willcocks, L.P. (2005), “Taking the measure of outsourcing
providers”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 41-8 (guest edition).
Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Pignatelli, A. and Varetto, M. (2003), “Outsourcing: guidelines for a
structured approach”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 246-60.
Gewald, H. and Franke, J. (2007), “The risks of business process outsourcing: a two fold
assessment in German banking industry”, International Journal of Electronic Finance,
Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 420-41.
Globorman, S. and Vining, A.R. (2006), “The outsourcing decision, a strategic frame work”,
in Barrar, P. and Gervais, R. (Eds), Global Outsourcing Strategies – An International
Reference on Effective Outsourcing Relationship, Gower, Hampshire.
BPMJ Gottfredson, M., Puryear, R. and Phillips, S. (2005), “Strategic sourcing from periphery to the
core”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83 No. 2, pp. 132-9.
18,6
Graf, M. and Mudambi, S.M. (2005), “The outsourcing of IT-enabled business processes:
a conceptual model of the location decision”, Journal of International Management, Vol. 11
No. 2, pp. 253-68.
Halvey, J.K. and Melby, B.M. (1996), Information Technology Outsourcing Transactions:
894 Processes, Strategies, and Contracts, Wiley, New York, NY.
Haniffa, A. (2008), “US strongly opposed to ban on outsourcing”, 13 June, available at: www.
rediff.com/money/2003/jun/13bpo.htm (accessed 22 May).
Hayes, D., Hunton, J. and Reck, J. (2000), “Information systems outsourcing announcements:
investigating the impact on market value of contract-granting firms”, Journal of
Information Systems, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 109-26.
Himachali, S. (2006), BPO Industry in India – A Report, available at: http://EzineArticles.com/?
expert¼Sanjeev_Himachali (accessed 24 January 2009).
(The) Hindu (2005), “Business process outsourcing”, The Hindu, 24 April, p. 16.
(The) Hindu Business Line (2008), “BPO sector can see 5-fold growth”, The Hindu Business Line,
30 January, available at: www.thehindubusinessline.com/2008/01/30/stories/
2008013050730400.htm (accessed 15 May).
International Business Times (2008), “Nasscom-Kearney study on IT-BPO industry identifies small
cities with big potential”, International Business Times, 6 May, available at: http://in.ibtimes.
com/articles/20080506/bpo-nasscom-kearney-industry-report.htm (accessed 26 June).
Iqbal, B.A. (2005), “Business outsourcing and Indo-US relations”, Yojana, Vol. 49, October,
pp. 20-2.
Johnson, J. and Schneider, K. (1995), “Outsourcing in distribution: the growing importance of
transaction brokers”, Business Horizons, Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 40-9.
Johnson, L.K. (2006), “Successful business process outsourcing”, MIT Slone Management Review,
Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 5-6.
Karnik, K. (2005), “Indian ITES-BPO: vision 2010”, Yojana, Vol. 49, October, pp. 2-6.
Kelly, T. and Poole, D. (2006), “The evolution of outsourcing”, in Barrar, P. and Gervais, R. (Eds),
Global Outsourcing Strategies – An International Reference on Effective Outsourcing
Relationship, Gower, Hampshire.
Khalfan, A. (2003), “A case analysis of business process outsourcing project failure profile and
implementation problems in a large organisation of a developing nation”, Business Process
Management Journal, Vol. 9 No. 6, pp. 745-59.
Lacity, M. and Willcocks, L. (1998), “An empirical investigation on information technology
sourcing practices: lessons from experience”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 363-409.
Linder, J.C. (2004), “Transformational outsourcing”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 45
No. 2, pp. 52-8.
Linder, J.C., Cole, M.I. and Jacobson, A.L. (2002), “Business transformation through outsourcing”,
Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 23-8.
Loh, L. and Venkatraman, N. (1992), “Determinants of information technology outsourcing:
a cross sectional analysis”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 9 No. 1,
pp. 7-24.
Mahmoodzadeh, E., Jalalinia, Sh. and Yazdi, F.N. (2009), “A business process outsourcing
framework based on business process management and knowledge management”,
Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 845-64.
Mani, D., Barua, A. and Whinston, A. (2006), “Successfully governing business process Business process
outsourcing relationships”, MIS Quarterly Executive, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 15-29.
outsourcing
May, A.S. (1998), “Business process outsourcing: a new test of management competence”, Career
Development International, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 136-41.
Mehra, V. (2005), “India: a preferred investment destination”, Yojana, Vol. 49, October, pp. 23-4.
Mehta, A., Armenakis, A., Mehta, N. and Irani, F. (2006), “Challenges and opportunities of
business process outsourcing in India”, Journal of Labour Research, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 323-6.
895
Mitra, K.S. (2006), “India’s new faces of outsourcing”, The Washington Post, 11 January, available
at: www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001687.html
(accessed 21 September 2011).
Mitra, K.S. (2008), “How to save the world’s back office”, 18 March, available at: www.rediff.com/
money/2008/mar/18bpo.htm (accessed 24 May).
Monga, D. and Chakravarty, C. (2008), “Barclays to set up captive BPO in India”, The Economic
Times, 10 May, available at: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Infotech/ITeS/Barclays_
to_set_up_captive_BPO_in_India/articleshow/3026165.cms (accessed 24 June).
Nag, B. (2005), “Business process outsourcing: impact and implications”, Bulletin on Asia Pacific
Perspective, May 2004, pp. 59-73.
Narang, K. (2008), “Smaller cities may capture 2-3 m IT/BPO jobs by 2018”, The Hindu Business
Line, 6 May, available at: www.thehindubusinessline.com/2008/05/06/stories/
2008050652020400.htm (accessed 24 June).
NASSCOM ITES Directory (2002), National Association of Software and Service Companies
Directory on IT-BPO Industries in India, September.
NASSCOM-McKinsey Report (2005), Extending India’s Leadership of the Global IT and BPO
Industries, available at: www.mckinsey.com/locations/india/mckinseyonindia/pdf/
NASSCOM_McKinsey_Report_2005.pdf (accessed 28 June 2008).
NASSCOM Strategic Review (2008), Executive Summary, SR2008_Exec_Summery
NASSCOM.pdf, pp. 1-9, available at: www.nasscom.in/upload/SR2008_Exec_%
20Summary.PDF (accessed 10 February 2009).
Odagiri, H. (2003), “Transaction costs and capabilities as determinants of the R&D boundaries of
the firm: a case study of the ten largest pharmaceutical firms in Japan”, Managerial and
Decision Economics, Vol. 24 Nos 2/3, pp. 187-211.
Ono, Y. (2003), “Outsourcing business services and the role of central administrative officers”,
Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 377-95.
Pai, U.L. (2006), “India-world leader in business process outsourcing (BPO)”, available at: www.
investorideas.com/IiI/News/082906.asp (assessed 10 February 2009).
Parikh, S. (2005), “BPO work pressure causes insomnia”, Yojana, Vol. 49, October, p. 35.
Picot, A., Reich Weld, R. and Wigand, R. (1997), Information Organisation and Management:
Expanding Markets and Corporate Boundaries, Wiley, New York, NY.
Portor, M.E. (2001), “Strategy and the internet”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79 No. 2, pp. 63-78.
Prasad, S. (2008a), “BPO jobs beckon India’s smaller towns”, ZD Net Asia, 27 May, available at:
www.zdnetasia.com/news/business/0,39044229,62041803,00.htm (accessed 8 July).
Prasad, S. (2008b), “China is India’s only possible threat”, Business Week, 12 May, available at: www.
businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/may2008/gb20080512_937505.htm?chan¼topþnews_
topþnewsþindex_globalþbusiness (accessed 16 June).
BPMJ Pricewaterhouse Coopers (2005), The Evolution of BPO in India, available at: www.pwc.com/
extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/244E23BB170A0B69CA25718100075183/$file/IACC_
18,6 PwCBPOSurvey2005.pdf (accessed 18 January 2009).
Quinn, J.B. (1999), “Strategic outsourcing: leveraging knowledge capabilities”, Sloan
Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 9-21.
Quinn, J.B. and Hilmer, F.G. (1994), “Strategic outsourcing”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 35
896 No. 4, pp. 43-55.
Raul, R.K. (2004), “BPO in Indian landscape”, Yojana, Vol. 48, May, pp. 32-6.
Rouse, A.C. and Corbitt, B. (2004), “IT-supported business process outsourcing (BPO): the good,
the bad and the ugly”, paper presented at the Eight Pacific Asia Conference on Information
Systems (APCIS), Shanghai, China.
Russell, I. (2008a), “BPOs to attract diverse talent pool”, 6 February, available at: www.rediff.
com/money/2008/feb/06bpo.htm (accessed 16 May).
Russell, I. (2008b), “Domestic market shines for BPOs”, 14 March, available at: www.rediff.com/
money/2008/mar/14bpo.htm (accessed 24 May).
Sampler, J.L. (1998), “Redefining industry structure in the information age”, Strategic
Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 345-55.
Saunders, C., Gabilt, M. and Hu, Q. (1997), “Achieving success in information systems
outsourcing”, California Management Review, Vol. 39, pp. 63-79.
Saxena, K.B.C. and Bharadwaj, S.S. (2009), “Managing business processes through outsourcing:
a strategic partnering perspective”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 15 No. 5,
pp. 687-715.
Sharma, S. (2004), BPO Industry in India – A Report, August, available at: www.bpoindia.org/
research/bpo-in-india.shtml (accessed 14 June 2008).
Singh, K. and Chaudhury, S. (2008), “HIL to pick up 8.5% in Apollo BPO”, The Economic Times,
21 May, available at: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/News_By_Industry/
Healthcare__Biotech/HIL_to_pick_up_85_in_Apollo_BPO/articleshow/3057402.cms
(accessed 24 June).
Sople, V.V. (2009), Business Process Outsourcing: A Supply Chain of Expertise, Eastern Economy
Edition, PHI Learning Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.
Srikanth (2006), “Indian BPO industry”, January, available at: www.citehr.com/6178-bpo-india-
indian-bpo-industry.html (accessed 16 May 2008).
Tornbohm, C. and Andrault, M. (2005), “User survey: business process outsourcing”, Western
Europe Report [ID: G00126191, 2004], Gartner Group.
TPI (2007), The TPI Index – An Informed View of the State of the Global Commercial Outsourcing
Market, Technology Partners International, Ikeja.
Tripathy, V.N. (Ed.) (2005), “Government seeks World Bank aid for Bharat Nirman”, Yojana,
Vol. 49, October, p. 17.
VSNL Annual Report (2006-2007), 21st Annual Report of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited,
available at: www.tatacommunications.com/downloads/investors/annual/AR2007.pdf
(accessed 25 September 2011).
Wikipedia (2007), “Business process outsourcing in India”, 3 February 2009, available at: http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_process_outsourcing_in_India (accessed 5 February 2009).
Willcocks, L., Hindle, J., Feeny, D. and Lacity, M. (2004), “IT and business process outsourcing:
the knowledge potential”, Information Systems Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, p. 7.
Wu, L. and Park, D. (2009), “Dynamics outsourcing through process modularization”, Business Business process
Process Management Journal, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 225-44.
Yojana (2005a), “Around 35,000 US jobs may be outsourced by 2010”, Yojana, Vol. 49, October,
outsourcing
p. 37.
Yojana (2005b), “Nasscom announces ranking of third party ITES”, Yojana, Vol. 49, October,
pp. 18-19.
897
Further reading
Bathelemy, J. (2003), “The seven deadly sins of outsourcing”, The Academy of Management
Executive, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 87-98.
Karnik, K. (2008), “Future of BPOs lies in rural India”, 19 May, available at: www.rediff.com/
money/2008/may/19bpo.htm (accessed 22 June).
Kumar, B.S. and Elgin, A. (2007), “Impact of globalization on BPO industry in India”,
12 February, available at: www.indianmba.com/Faculty_Column/FC517/fc517.htm
(accessed 22 June 2008).
Kumar, R.S. (2008), “BPO culture: good or bad for Indian youth?”, 11 May, available at: www.
merinews.com/catFull.jsp?articleID¼133830 (accessed 24 June).
Sapru, A. (2006), “BPO and compliance”, Network Magazine India, February, available at: www.
networkmagazineindia.com/200602/analyst’scorner01.shtml (accessed 12 June 2008).
Shastri, P. (2008), “Rural BPOs give women a fair deal”, The Times of India, 19 May, available at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Hyderabad/Rural_BPOs_give_women_a_fair_deal/
articleshow/3051918.cms (accessed 26 June).
Sunija, K. and Shinde, S. (2008), “BPOs design in-house curricula to train staff”, 24 May, available
at: www.rediff.com/money/2008/may/24bpo.htm (accessed 22 June).