Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROCESS SELECTION,
FACILITY LAYOUT &
STRATEGIC CAPACITY
PLANNING
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
GROUP 5
Table of Contents
Process Selection and Facility Layout
INTRODUCTION
PROCESS SELECTION
TECHNOLOGY
PROCESS STRATEGY
STRATEGY FORMULATION
EVALUATING ALTERNATIVES(X)
OPERATIONS STRATEGY(x)
JOSH
Process Selection and Facility Layout
Introduction
- What Does Product and Service Design Do?
- is there a demand for it?
- can we do it
- what level of quality is appropriate?
-Does it make sense from an economic standpoint?
Process Selection
1. How much variety in products or services will the
system need to handle?
2. What degree of equipment flexibility will be needed?
3. What is the expected volume of output?
Process types
1. Job Shop
2. Batch
3. Repetitive
4. Continuous
Technology
Automation
Fixed Automation
Programmable Automation
CAM
N/C Machines
FMS
CIM
CATHERINE
D ESIGNING PROCESS LAYOUT
MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS
-One of the advantage of process layouts is their ability to satisfy a variety of processing
requirements customers or materials. In this system require different operations and different
sequence of operations which cause them to follow different paths through the system.
-Material-oriented system necessitates the use of variable path material handling equipment to
move materials from work centers to work centers.
-Consumer oriented system people must have traveled or be transported from work centers to
work centers
-In both cases, transportation cost or time can be significant.
-INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
The design process layouts require six information requirements.
- MINIMIZING TRANSPORTATION COSTS Ranking departments according to highest work flow
OR DISTANCE and locations according to highest inter-location
The most common goals in designing process layouts are distances helps in making assignments.
minimization of transportation costs or distance
travelled.
From these listings, you can see that departments 1 and 3 have the highest interdepartmental work flow, and
that locations A and B are the closest. Thus, it seems reasonable to consider assigning 1 and 3 to locations A and
B, although it is not yet obvious which department should be assigned to which location. Further inspection of
the work flow list reveals that 2 and 3 have higher work flow than 1 and 2, so 2 and 3 should probably be located
more closely than 1 and 2. Hence, it would seem reasonable to place 3 between 1 and 2, or at least centralize
that department with respect to the other two. The resulting assignments might appear an illustrated in Figure
6.11.
CATHERINE
CATHERINE
CLOSENESS RATINGS
Muther suggests the following list:
1. They use same equipment or facilities.
2. They share the same personnel or records.
3. Required sequence of work flow.
For a number of reasons, capacity decisions are among the most fundamental of all design decisions that
manager must make. In fact, capacity decisions can be critical for an organization:
1. Capacity decisions have a real impact on the ability of the organization to meet future demands for
products and services; capacity essentially limits the rate of output possible.
2. Capacity decisions affect operating costs. Ideally, capacity and demand requirements will be matched,
which will tend to minimize operating costs.
3. Capacity is usually a major determinant of initial cost. Typically, the greater the capacity of a productive
unit, the greater its cost. This does not necessarily imply a one-for-one relationship; larger units tend to
cost proportionately less than smaller units.
4. Capacity decisions often involve long-term commitment of resources and the fact that, once they are
implemented, those decisions may be difficult or impossible to modify without incurring major costs.
5. Capacity decisions can affect competitiveness.
6. Capacity affects the ease of management; having appropriate capacity makes management easier than
when capacity is mismatched.
7. Globalization has increased the importance and the complexity of capacity decisions.
8. Because capacity decisions often involve substantial financial and other resources, it I necessary to plan
for them far in advance.
IRENE
PROCESS STRATEGY
Process strategy is the pattern of decisions made in managing processes so that they will achieve their
competitive priorities
Decision makers choose flexible systems for either of two reasons:
1. Demand variety or uncertainty exists about demand.
2. Can be overcome through improved forecasting.
STRATEGIC RESOURCE DESIGNING PRODUCT LAYOUTS: LINE BALANCING The
ORGANIZATION goal of a product layout is to arrange workers or machines
FACILITIES LAYOUT in the sequence that operations need to be performed.
Layout refers to the configuration of Line balancing -The process of assigning tasks to
departments, work centers, and equipment, workstations in such a way that the workstations have
with particular emphasis on movement of approximately equal time requirements.
work (customers or materials) through the Cycle time- The maximum time allowed at each workstation
system to complete
Precedence diagram -A diagram that shows elemental
The basic objective of layout design is to tasks and their precedence requirements. Balance delay
facilitate a smooth flow of work, material, Percentage of idle time of a line.
and information through the system. Some Guidelines for Line Balancing
Tasks are assigned one at a time to the line
The three basic types of layout are: Unassigned tasks are checked to determine which are
product eligible for assignment
process Eligible tasks are checked to see which of them will fit in
Fixed-position. the workstation being loaded
ROSE IVY
Process Selection and Facility Layout
Capacity often refers to an upper limit on the rate of output. Even though this seems simple enough,
there are subtle difficulties in actually measuring capacity in certain cases due to different
interpretations. Up to this point, we have been using a general definition of capacity. Although it is
functional, it can be refined into two useful definitions of capacity:
1. Design capacity: The maximum output rate or service capacity an operation, process, or facility is
designed for.
2. Effective capacity: Design capacity minus allowances such as personal time, and maintenance.
These different measures of capacity are useful in defining two measures of system effectiveness:
efficiency and utilization. Efficiency is the ratio of actual output to effective capacity. Capacity
utilization is the ratio of actual output to design capacity.
CONSTRAINT MANAGEMENT
A constraint is something that limits the performance of a process or system in achieving its goals.
Constraint management is often based on the work of Eli Goldratt ( The Theory of Constraints ),
and Eli Schragenheim and H. William Dettmer ( Manufacturing at Warp Speed )
VHEA
There may only be a few constraints, or there may be more than a few. Constraint
issues can be resolved by using the following five steps:
1. Identify the most pressing constraint. If it can easily be overcome, do so, and return to
Step 1 for the next constraint. Otherwise, proceed to Step 2.
2. Change the operation to achieve the maximum benefit, given the constraint. This may be
a short-term solution.
3. Make sure other portions of the process are supportive of the constraint (e.g., bottleneck
operation).
4. Explore and evaluate ways to overcome the constraint. This will depend on the type of
constraint. For example, if demand is too low, advertising or price change may be an
option. If capacity is the issue, working overtime, purchasing new equipment, and
outsourcing
are possible options. If additional funds are needed, working to improve cash
flow, borrowing, and issuing stocks or bonds may be options. If suppliers are a problem,
work with them, find more desirable suppliers, or insource. If knowledge or skills areNO DRAFT
needed, seek training or consultants, or outsource. If laws or regulations are the issue,
working with lawmakers or regulators may be an option.
5. Repeat the process until the level of constraints is acceptable.
The owner of Old. Fashioned Berry Pies. S. Simon is
Evaluating Alternatives contemplating adding a new line of pies which will
- The purpose is to help eliminate the bias decision. require leasing new equipment for a monthly
payment of $6,000. Variable costs would be $2 per
Cost- volume analysis pie, and pies would retail for $7 each.
It focuses on relationships between cost, revenue, and
volume of output FC= $6,000 VC= $2 per pie R= $7 per pie
a.) pies must sold in order to break even.
TC = FC+VC (5-3) QBEP = FC = $6,000 = $1,200 pies/ month
VC = Q x v (5-4) R-VC $7-$2