GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

PROJECT NAME :-
PREPARATION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
URBAN EXTENSION ROAD (UER)- II-
NH 344M

CLIENT NAME :-
AECOM

REPORT BY:-
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANT

GGC
ISO: 9001-2015
 BRIEFDESCRIPTION

AECOM
CLIENT

PREPARTION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN EXTENSION

NAME OF WORK ROA (UER)-II-NH 344 M

BORE HOLE CH. FLYOVER, 20+709,1X30,A1

LOCATION SONIPAT, BAWANA (HARYANA)

GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (ISO : 9001-2015)

PlotNo.777, JLPL Industrial Area,
TESTING AGENCY Sector 82, Mohali, Punjab-160062.
Contact: 9888608424
Gmail:ggconsultants2010@gmail.com
Website:www.geoglobeconsultant.com

TESTING GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

 SOIL
INVESTIGATION
SOIL INVESTIGATION
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

SR. PAGE
DESCRIPTION
NO. NO
1 INTRODUCTION 4

2 SCOPE OF WORK 4

3 SITE 4

4 GROUND WATER TABLE 5

5 FIELD INVESTIGATION 5-6

6 LABORATORY INVESTIGATION 7-9

7 INTERPRETATION OF SOIL STRATA 9

8 NOTATIONS USED 10-11

9 N VALUE GRAPHS 12

SEIVE ANALYSIS CHART

10 13

11 FOUNDATION ANALYSIS 14-22

12 CONCLUSIONS A ND RECOMMENDATIONS 23

13 SUMMARY 23

14 BORE LOG CHARTS 24

15 BIBLIOGRAPHY 25

16 LATERAL LOAD CAPACITY 26-27

1 INTRODUCTION
1.01 The report presented herein deals with result of field and laboratory
investigation carried out to assess the nature of sub-soil strata and to
evaluate the bearing capacity and other parameters at Sonipat Bawana. Bore
Hole FLYOVER, 20+709,1X30,A1

1.02 The work of soil investigations was assigned to M/s Geo Globe Consultants,
Mohali. (Pb)

2 SCOPE OF WORK

The soil investigation covers the following: -

2.01 Conducting Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in 1 No. bore hole up to a
depth of 30m.
2.02 Collecting soil samples at various depths as per requirement of the Client
from the bore holes as feasible, for laboratory tests.
2.03 Analyzing the field and laboratory observations.
2.04 Submitting four copies of the soil investigations report and recommending
safe Bearing capacity of soil.

3 SITE

3.01 The Site of Investigation is at Sonipat Bawana. There is no special features which
affected the explorations.
3.02 The location of bore holes was given by the client’s representative who was with the
investigating team till the investigations were over.
 4 GROUND WATER TABLE

Water Table Depth

Sr.No. B.H 1 Location From NGL
(m)
1 FLYOVER, 20+709,1X30, A1 2.8 m

5 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS

The field investigations were conducted to cover the entire scope of the job.

Boring – operations (IS 1892-1979)

The exploratory bore holes were made by shell and auger by pushing the casing pipe and
removing material within the casing. To avoid excessive disturbance to the in-situ deposits,
the casing was not driven but was rotated frequently with slow motion. The samples were
taken from below the bottom of the casing after completely cleaning the bore holes of any
loose material at all depths wherever the samples had to be taken. The undisturbed soil
samples were taken by pushing thin walled tubes into the bore holes. Immediately after
taking these, they were logged, labeled, sealed in polythene bag and sent to the laboratory for
testing.

5.02 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)( IS: 2131)

The Standard Penetration Tests were conducted at various depths in the bore holes. These
tests were conducted by driving into the soil a standard split spoon sampler. This sampler
was driven with the help of a hammer weighing 63.5 kg. Which was vertically guided to fall
through a free height of 75cm on the driving head. This driving head was attached to a drill
rod, to the other end of which the sampler was fitted. The number of blows required to
penetrate the first, second and third 15 cm lengths of the sampler were noted. The number of
blow (i.e.N value), as given in the data sheets of bore holes, is the numerical value for the
number of blows counted during the second and third stages i.e. for a depth of 30 cms. The
procedure adopted for conducting this test was as per IS: 2131. The observed N values for all
the boreholes have been noted down in tables
 6 LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS

6.01 The laboratory tests were conducted on selected soil samples recovered from the test
bore holes. The results obtained have been given in the various tables at the end of the report.

6.02: Grain Size Analysis: ( IS 2720 part 4)

Grain Size analysis was carried out on Disturbed and undisturbed Samples obtained during
boring operation. Percentage of sand and combined Silt and Clay were determined from this
analysis. The test was carried out as per IS: 2720 (Part IV)
6.03: Liquid Limits and Plastic Limits( IS 2720 part 5)
To obtain an idea about the consistency characteristics of materials met with at various
elevations, the liquid limits and plastic limits of fine fractions were evaluated as per procedure
laid down in IS : 2720 (Part-V). These values have been recorded only in the case of plastic
samples (cohesive soils), on the bore hole data.

6.04:
To obtain an idea about the consistency characteristics of materials met with at various
elevations, the liquid limits and plastic limits of fine fractions were evaluated as per procedure
laid down in IS : 2720 (Part-V). These values have been recorded only in the case of plastic
samples (cohesive soils), on the bore hole data.
6.05
The wet density and grain size analysis was done for the samples taken as per
IS : 2720 (Part IV)

6.06 Direct Shear Test(IS 2720 part 13):1986

This test was performed in a shear-box apparatus. The apparatus consisted of two-piece shear
box of square cross-section. The lower half of the box was rigidly held in positions in a
container which rested over rollers and which was pushed forward at a constant rate by a
geared jack, driven by an electric motor. The upper half of the box
butted against a proving ring. The soil sample was compacted in the shear box and was
held between metal grids and porous stones. Normal load was applied on the pressure pad.
The shearing strain was made to increase at constant rate. The shear force at failure
corresponding to the applied normal load was measured with the help of the proving ring. A
number of identical specimens were tested under increasing normal loads and the required
maximum shear force was recorded and a graph was plotted between shear force as the
ordinate and normal load as the abscissa to get the failure envelops and the value of C&.

6.07 Unconfined Compression Test :(IS : 2720 Part 10) is carried out on cylindrical
sample of cohesive soil of dia 3.8 cm as per guidelines given in code.

6.08Triaxial Compression Test ( IS 2720 part 11)

A triaxial compression test is the most versatile test available for the shear testing of soil. In
this test a soil specimen , cylindrical in shape was subjected to direct stresses acting in three
mutually perpendicular directions by means of triaxial apparatus comprises of triaxial cell and
loading frame. The major principal stress was applied in the vertical direction and the other
two principal stresses were applied in the horizontal directions by the fluid pressure all around
the specimen the test was performed on cylindrical specimen of dia 38 mm. The height of the
specimen was twice the dia. Shearing processes were started immediately without any
consolidation and without allowing any drainage of water. In this way no drainage or
dissipation of pore water pressure from soil specimen took place
during the entire testing time

7 CONSOLIDATION TESTS (IS 2720 PART 15)

The consolidation tests were carried out on undisturbed soil specimen in order to determine the
settlement characteristics of soil at different depths. The tests is conducted in accordance to IS
: 2720 (Pt-XV).
An undisturbed soil specimen was extruded to the consolidation ring of 60mm dia. The edge
was trimmed carefully such that the sample was flushed with the top and bottom edges of the
ring. The thickness of the specimen was measured and the weight was recorded. The bottom
porous stone was then centered on the base of the
consolidation cell. The specimen was then placed centrally between the bottom porous stone
and the upper porous stone. A filter paper was provided in between specimen and porous
stones. Then the loading cap was placed on the top. The consolidometer was placed in position
in the loading device and suitably adjusted. The dial gauge is then clamped into position for
recording the relative movement between the base of the cell and the loading cap. A seating
pressure of 0.05 kg/cm2 was applied to the specimen. The cell was kept filled with water.
After 24 hr. the test was continued further using a loading sequence on the soil specimen of
 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, & 8.0 kg/cm2. For each loading increment after application of load,
readings of the dial gauge was taken using time sequence 0, 0.25, 1, 2.25, 2, 6.25, 9, 16, 25,
36, 49 ... up to 24 hrs. From the observations of all incremental pressures, void ratio versus log
(pressure) curve was obtained. The slope of the straight line portion was designated as
compression index cc.

7.1 Interpretation of Soil Strata

i) On perusal of the strata chart (Table-1) indicates the sub-soil strata at

the site is heterogeneous in nature

ii) Bore hole location the majority of soil strata from NGL to 30 m Silt
was found was encountered. Water Table was encountered at 2.6m from NGL.
 NOTATIONS USED

NSL - Natural Surface Level

SSWL - Sub-soil Water Level
B - Width of Footing
L - Length of Footing
D - Depth of Footing
P - Effective Pressure
P0 - Initial Effective Pressure at mid height of layer
∆P - Pressure Increment
q - Effective Surcharge at Base Level of foundation
Pn - Net Loading Intensity
qnf - Net Ultimate Bearing capacity
qa - Allowable b.c.
qns - Net safe b.c. against Shear Failure
N - SPT Value
Nn - Normalized SPT Value
CN - Correction Factor for N-Value
NC - Corrected SPT Value
CL - Clay of low plasticity
ML - Silt of low plasticity
SP - Poorly Graded Sand with no fines
SM - Silty Sand, Poorly Graded Sand-Silt Mixture
SW - Well Graded Sand with no fines
GW - Well Graded Gravels
GP - Poorly Graded Gravels
GM - Silty Gravels
GSF - General Shear Failure
LSF - Local Shear Failure
GC - Clayey Gravels
SC - Clayey Sands
MI - Silt of Medium Plasticity
CI - Clay of Medium Plasticity
MH - Silt of High Plasticity
CH - Clay of High Plasticity
M(NP) - Non Plastic Silt
ML-CL - Mixture of ML and CL
 - Angle of Internal Friction
' - Effective Angle of Internal Friction
m - Mobilized Angle of Internal Friction
Nc,Nq,Nγ - Bearing Capacity Factors
Sc,Sq,Sγ - Shape Factors
dc,dq,d γ - Depth Factors
w’ - Moisture Content
γ - Bulk Unit Weight
γsat - Saturated Bulk Unit Weight
γd - Dry Bulk Density
γ’ - Submerged Unit Weight
qu - Unconfined Compressive Strength
Cu - Untrained Shear Strength
C’ - Effective Cohesion
G - Specific Gravity
H - Thickness of Soil Layer
Ht - Thickness of sandy layer
Bt - Top width of sandy layer
∆Pt - Stress increment at top of sandy layer
Df - Depth factor
Lyf - Lateral yield factor
Rf - Rigidity factor
So - Settlement due to net unit foundation loading
intensity (1 Kg/Cm2)
Sob - Settlement due to net unit foundation loading
intensity under submerged conditions (1Kg/Cm2)
St - Total settlement
e0 - Void Ratio
FOS - Factor of Safety
LL - Liquid Limit
PL - Plastic Limit
9 N-VALUES GRAPH FLYOVER, 20+709,1X30,A1

BH
10-SEIVE ANALYSIS FOR FLYOVER, 20+709,1X30,A1
 11 FOUNDATION ANALYSIS:- FLYOVER, 20+709,1X30,A1

LENGTH OF PILE = 20 M DIA OF PILE 1000 MM

LENGTH OF PILE = 25 M DIA OF PILE 1000 MM
LENGTH OF PILE = 27 M DIA OF PILE 1000 MM
LENGTH OF PILE = 20 M DIA OF PILE 1200 MM
LENGTH OF PILE = 25 M DIA OF PILE 1200 MM
 Design of Pile Foundation
Estimation of Safe Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of "Bored Cast in Situ Concrete Pile"
[As per IRC 78 - 2014]

20+709,1 FLYOVER,
Name of Project: SONIPAT BAWANA PROJECT Type of Structure F/O Location Based on Bore Hole Pile Cut-off level (m) 2.30
X30,A1 20+709,1X30,A1

Bored Cast- Inclination of pile with Factor of Safety for Base River or Stream Bed Level/Ground Level Water Level considered for calculation
Type of Pile Foundation: in-situ vertical Axis (deg.) 3 2.80 Pile Cap Bottom Level RL (m) 23.2
Resistance (m) (m)
Concrete
Pile

Factor of Safety for Shaft

LENGTH OF PILE = 27 M DIA OF PILE 1200 MM

Pile Diameter (mm): Earth Pressure 3 Scour Level below the cut off Level (m) 0 Pile Cap Top Level (m) 0.00 Pile Tip Level RL (m)
1200 1.2 Resistance
Coefficient Ks

Liquefaction depth below cut-off level (m) 0

Bearing Capacity Ultimate Base Resistance Ultimate Shaft Friction

Factors Ppu = Ap (cNc + PdNq + 0.5gDNg) PSU = (Ʃ(Ks.Pdi.tand). Asi + a.c.As)
Total/ Total Total
Angle of g Effective Total Safe Capacity, PS Depth
Type of Submerged Effective overburden Ultimate safe
Layer Thickness of Length from Water table Cohesion, C Shearing (density over burden Weight of pile, (Tonnes) from
Sub Soil Unit Pressure at pile tip "qtip" Capacity, PU uplift
no. Layer (m) Cut off level (W.T.) (m) (t/m2) Resistance,  of soil) Ap Ppu Pressure at Asi Adhesion groun
Layer 3
Weight of (t/m2) Nc Nq Ng c.Nc Pd.Nq 0.5.g.D.Ng (Ks.Pdi.tand).Asi a.c.A
PSU = P + P WP (Tonnes)
pu SU capacity
(deg.) (t/m ) 3 PS = PU/3 - WP level (m)
Soil (t/m ) (m2) (tonnes) c.g. of the (m2) Factor, a s (tonnes) (tonnes) (Tonnes)
layer 'Pdi'
(t/m2)
1 SM 3 0.7 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 5.23 0 18 20.1 1.13 0 94.14 10.0 117.79 2.615 8.28 14.40 0.00 0.00 14.4 132.2 1.32 42.7 4.7 3
2 SM 1.2 1.9 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 6.23 0 20 22.4 1.13 0 124.52 11.2 153.45 5.728 4.52 17.24 0.00 0.00 31.6 185.1 3.59 58.1 11.0 4.2
3 SM 2.5 4.4 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 8.30 0 20 22.4 1.13 0 166.02 11.2 200.38 7.2635 9.42 45.54 0.00 0.00 77.2 277.6 8.31 84.2 26.3 6.7
4 SM 3.5 7.9 2.80 0 30 1.81 0.83 11.21 0 20 22.4 1.13 0 224.12 11.2 266.09 9.7535 13.19 89.16 0.00 0.00 166.3 432.4 14.92 129.2 53.7 10.2
5 SM 4.5 12.4 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 14.99 0 20 22.4 1.13 0 299.72 11.3 351.74 13.096 16.96 160.19 0.00 0.00 326.5 678.3 23.28 202.8 99.5 14.7
6 SM 6 18.4 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 20.03 0 25.6 27.5 1.13 0 512.77 13.9 595.60 17.508 22.62 285.54 0.00 0.00 612.1 1207.7 34.54 368.0 177.4 20.7
7 SM 4.6 23 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 20.70 0 25.6 27.5 1.13 0 529.92 13.9 615.00 20.365 17.34 254.64 0.00 0.00 866.7 1481.7 43.18 450.7 245.4 25.3
8 SM 4 27 2.80 0 32 1.82 0.84 20.70 0 25.6 27.5 1.13 0 529.92 13.9 615.00 20.7 15.08 234.06 0.00 0.00 1100.8 1715.8 50.69 521.2 307.5 29.3
 Design of Pile Foundation
Estimation of Safe Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of "Bored Cast in Situ Concrete Pile"
[As per IRC 78 - 2014]

20+709,1 FLYOVER,
Name of Project: SONIPAT BAWANA PROJECT Type of Structure F/O Location Based on Bore Hole Pile Cut-off level (m) 2.30
X30,A1 20+709,1X30,A1

Bored Cast- Inclination of pile with Factor of Safety for Base River or Stream Bed Level/Ground Level Water Level considered for calculation
Type of Pile Foundation: in-situ vertical Axis (deg.) 3 2.80 Pile Cap Bottom Level RL (m) 23.2
Resistance (m) (m)
Concrete
Pile
LENGTH OF PILE = 20 M DIA OF PILE 1500 MM

Factor of Safety for Shaft

Pile Diameter (mm): Earth Pressure 3 Scour Level below the cut off Level (m) 0 Pile Cap Top Level (m) 0.00 Pile Tip Level RL (m)
1500 1.2 Resistance
Coefficient Ks

Liquefaction depth below cut-off level (m) 0

Bearing Capacity Ultimate Base Resistance Ultimate Shaft Friction

Factors Ppu = Ap (cNc + PdNq + 0.5gDNg) PSU = (Ʃ(Ks.Pdi.tand). Asi + a.c.As)
Total/ Total Total
Angle of g Effective Total Safe Capacity, PS Depth
Type of Submerged Effective overburden Ultimate safe
Layer Thickness of Length from Water table Cohesion, C Shearing (density over burden Weight of pile, (Tonnes) from
Sub Soil Unit Pressure at pile tip "qtip" Capacity, PU uplift
no. Layer (m) Cut off level (W.T.) (m) (t/m2) Resistance,  of soil) Ap Ppu Pressure at Asi Adhesion P W P (Tonnes) ground
Layer 3
Weight of (t/m2) Nc Nq Ng c.Nc Pd.Nq 0.5.g.D.Ng (Ks.Pdi.tand).Asi a.c.A SU = Ppu + PSU capacity
(deg.) (t/m ) PS = PU/3 - WP level (m)
Soil (t/m3) (m2) (tonnes) c.g. of the (m2) Factor, a s (tonnes) (tonnes) (Tonnes)
layer 'Pdi'
(t/m2)
1 SM 3 0.7 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 5.23 0 18 20.1 1.77 0 94.14 12.5 188.47 2.615 8.28 14.40 0.00 0.00 14.4 202.9 2.07 65.6 5.4 3
2 SM 1.2 1.9 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 6.23 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 124.52 13.9 244.69 5.728 5.65 21.55 0.00 0.00 35.9 280.6 5.61 87.9 14.0 4.2
3 SM 2 3.9 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 7.89 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 157.72 13.9 303.36 7.056 9.42 44.23 0.00 0.00 80.2 383.5 11.51 116.3 30.2 6.2
4 SM 3 6.9 2.80 0 30 1.81 0.83 10.38 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 207.52 13.9 391.36 9.131 14.14 89.43 0.00 0.00 169.6 561.0 20.36 166.6 59.9 9.2
5 SM 3.5 10.4 2.80 0 30 1.81 0.83 13.28 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 265.62 13.9 494.03 11.8285 16.49 135.16 0.00 0.00 304.8 798.8 30.69 235.6 101.8 12.7
6 SM 5.5 15.9 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 17.90 0 25.6 27.5 1.77 0 458.24 17.3 840.39 15.5905 25.92 291.35 0.00 0.00 596.1 1436.5 46.64 432.2 185.7 18.2
7 SM 2.1 18 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 19.66 0 25.6 27.5 1.77 0 503.3 17.3 920.01 18.78 9.90 134.00 0.00 0.00 730.1 1650.1 52.80 497.2 223.2 20.3
8 SM 2 20 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 25.04 0 25.6 27.5 1.77 0 641.02 17.3 1163.40 22.35 9.42 151.88 0.00 0.00 882.0 2045.4 58.67 623.1 264.5 22.3
 Design of Pile Foundation
Estimation of Safe Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of "Bored Cast in Situ Concrete Pile"
[As per IRC 78 - 2014]

20+709,1 FLYOVER,
Name of Project: SONIPAT BAWANA PROJECT Type of Structure F/O Location Based on Bore Hole Pile Cut-off level (m) 2.30
X30,A1 20+709,1X30,A1

Bored Cast- Inclination of pile with
Type of Pile Foundation: in-situ vertical Axis (deg.)
Concrete
Pile
Factor of Safety for Base River or Stream Bed Level/Ground Level Water Level considered for calculation
3 2.50 Pile Cap Bottom Level RL (m) 23.2
Resistance (m) (m)

Factor of Safety for Shaft

LENGTH OF PILE = 25 M DIA OF PILE 1500 MM

Pile Diameter (mm): Earth Pressure 3 Scour Level below the cut off Level (m) 0 Pile Cap Top Level (m) 0.00 Pile Tip Level RL (m)
1500 1.2 Resistance
Coefficient Ks

Liquefaction depth below cut-off level (m) 0

Bearing Capacity Ultimate Base Resistance Ultimate Shaft Friction

Factors Ppu = Ap (cNc + PdNq + 0.5gDNg) PSU = (Ʃ(Ks.Pdi.tand). Asi + a.c.As)
Total/ Total Total
Angle of g Effective Total Safe Capacity, PS Depth
Type of Submerged Effective overburden Ultimate safe
Layer Thickness of Length from Water table Cohesion, C Shearing (density over burden Weight of pile, (Tonnes) from
Sub Soil Unit Pressure at pile tip "qtip" Capacity, PU uplift
no. Layer (m) Cut off level (W.T.) (m) (t/m2) Resistance,  of soil) Ap Ppu Pressure at Asi Adhesion P W P (Tonnes) ground
Layer Wei ght of (t/m2) Nc Nq Ng c.Nc Pd.Nq 0.5.g.D.Ng (Ks.Pdi.tand).Asi a.c.A SU = Ppu + PSU capacity
(deg.) (t/m3) 3 (m2) (tonnes) c.g. of the (m2) PS = PU/3 - WP level (m)
Soil (t/m ) Factor, a s (tonnes) (tonnes) (Tonnes)
layer 'Pdi'
(t/m2)
1 SM 3 0.7 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 5.23 0 18 20.1 1.77 0 94.14 12.5 188.47 2.615 8.28 14.40 0.00 0.00 14.4 202.9 2.07 65.6 5.4 3
2 SM 1.2 1.9 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 6.23 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 124.52 13.9 244.69 5.728 5.65 21.55 0.00 0.00 35.9 280.6 5.61 87.9 14.0 4.2
3 SM 2.5 4.4 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 8.30 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 166.02 13.9 318.02 7.2635 11.78 56.92 0.00 0.00 92.9 410.9 12.98 124.0 34.7 6.7
4 SM 3.5 7.9 2.80 0 30 1.81 0.83 11.21 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 224.12 13.9 420.69 9.7535 16.49 111.45 0.00 0.00 204.3 625.0 23.31 185.0 71.0 10.2
5 SM 4.5 12.4 2.80 0 30 1.82 0.84 14.99 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 299.72 14.1 554.59 13.096 21.21 192.40 0.00 0.00 396.7 951.3 36.37 280.7 128.9 14.7
6 SM 6 18.4 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 20.03 0 25.6 27.5 1.77 0 512.77 17.3 936.75 17.508 28.27 356.93 0.00 0.00 753.7 1690.4 53.98 509.5 229.8 20.7
7 SM 4.6 23 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 23.89 0 25.6 27.5 1.77 0 611.58 17.3 1111.37 21.96 21.68 343.23 0.00 0.00 1096.9 2208.3 67.47 668.6 323.4 25.3
8 SM 2 25 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 24.73 0 25.6 27.5 1.77 0 633.09 17.3 1149.37 24.31 9.42 165.20 0.00 0.00 1262.1 2411.5 73.34 730.5 367.8 27.3
 Design of Pile Foundation
Estimation of Safe Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of "Bored Cast in Situ Concrete Pile"
[As per IRC 78 - 2014]

FLYOVER,
Name of Project: SONIPAT BAWANA PROJECT Type of Structure F/O Location 20+709,1 Based on Bore Hole Pile Cut-off level (m) 2.30
20+709,1X30,A1
X30,A1

Bored Cast- Inclination of pile with
Type of Pile Foundation: in-situ vertical Axis (deg.)
Concrete
Pile
Factor of Safety for Base River or Stream Bed Level/Ground Level Water Level considered for calculation
3 2.50 Pile Cap Bottom Level RL (m) 23.2
Resistance (m) (m)
LENGTH OF PILE = 27 M DIA OF PILE 1500 MM

Factor of Safety for Shaft

Pile Diameter (mm): Earth Pressure 3 Scour Level below the cut off Level (m) 0 Pile Cap Top Level (m) 0.00 Pile Tip Level RL (m)
1500 1.2 Resistance
Coefficient Ks

Liquefaction depth below cut-off level (m) 0

Bearing Capacity Ultimate Base Resistance Ultimate Shaft Friction

Factors Ppu = Ap (cNc + PdNq + 0.5gDNg) PSU = (Ʃ(Ks.Pdi.tand). Asi + a.c.As)
Total/ Total Total
Angle of g Effective Total Safe Capacity, PS Depth
Type of Submerged Effective overburden Ultimate safe
Layer Thickness of Length from Water table Cohesion, C Shearing (density over burden Weight of pile, (Tonnes) from
Sub Soil Unit Pressure at pile tip "qtip" Capacity, PU uplift
no. Layer (m) Cut off level (W.T.) (m) (t/m2) Resistance,  of soil) Ap Ppu Pressure at Asi Adhesion ground
Layer 3
Weight of (t/m2) Nc Nq Ng c.Nc Pd.Nq 0.5.g.D.Ng (Ks.Pdi.tand).Asi a.c.A
PSU = P + P WP (Tonnes)
pu SU capacity
(deg.) (t/m ) 3 (m2) (tonnes) c.g. of the (m2) PS = PU/3 - WP level (m)
Soil (t/m ) Factor, a s (tonnes) (tonnes) (Tonnes)
layer 'Pdi'
(t/m2)
1 SM 3 0.7 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 5.23 0 18 20.1 1.77 0 94.14 12.5 188.47 2.615 8.28 14.40 0.00 0.00 14.4 202.9 2.07 65.6 5.4 3
2 SM 1.2 1.9 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 6.23 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 124.52 13.9 244.69 5.728 5.65 21.55 0.00 0.00 35.9 280.6 5.61 87.9 14.0 4.2
3 SM 2.5 4.4 2.80 0 29 1.81 0.83 8.30 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 166.02 13.9 318.02 7.2635 11.78 56.92 0.00 0.00 92.9 410.9 12.98 124.0 34.7 6.7
4 SM 3.5 7.9 2.80 0 30 1.81 0.83 11.21 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 224.12 13.9 420.69 9.7535 16.49 111.45 0.00 0.00 204.3 625.0 23.31 185.0 71.0 10.2
5 SM 4.5 12.4 2.80 0 31 1.81 0.83 14.94 0 20 22.4 1.77 0 298.82 13.9 552.70 13.0735 21.21 199.89 0.00 0.00 404.2 956.9 36.59 282.4 130.9 14.7
6 SM 6 18.4 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 19.98 0 25.6 27.5 1.77 0 511.49 17.3 934.49 17.4605 28.27 355.96 0.00 0.00 760.2 1694.7 53.98 510.9 231.4 20.7
7 SM 4.6 23 2.80 0 31 1.82 0.84 23.84 0 25.6 27.5 1.77 0 610.3 17.3 1109.11 21.91 21.68 342.45 0.00 0.00 1102.6 2211.7 67.47 669.8 324.7 25.3
8 SM 4 27 2.80 0 32 1.82 0.84 24.68 0 25.6 27.5 1.77 0 631.81 17.3 1147.11 24.26 18.85 342.90 0.00 0.00 1445.5 2592.6 79.20 785.0 416.5 29.3
 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

❖ On the basis of field & laboratory investigation & calculation forbearing capacity
values following reference have been drawn.

❖ The value of allowable B.C to be adopted for design consideration at different depths
are as follows
❖ This is the general recommendation. The designer may change the recommendation &
he may decide the depth of the foundation & type of foundation as per the structural
details of structure.

SUMMARY BH 1

Sr. Load of Lateral Capacity Uplift

N. Caring (Ton) Capacity
Dia of pile B Length of Pile Type of Foundation Capacity (Ton)
(m) (D) m (Ton)

Fixed Free
Head Head
1 20 Pile Foundation 287.1 49.015 8.606 158.8
1.0
2 25 Pile Foundation 345.4 51.053 8.964 210.6

3 27 Pile Foundation 372.9 60.119 10.555 234.5

4 20 Pile Foundation 399.3 65.617 11.521 200.1

1.2
5 25 Pile Foundation 482.4 68.346 12.00 274

6 27 Pile Foundation 521.2 80.48 14.131 307.5

7 20 Pile Foundation 623.1 93.77 16.464 264.5

1.5
8 25 Pile Foundation 730.5 97.673 17.149 367.8

9 27 Pile Foundation 785 115.016 20.194 416.5

BORE LOG CHART
BIBLIOGRAPHY:-

1) (IS 1892-1979) : Code of practice for subsurface investigation for foundations

2) (IS: 2131) : Code of practice for Standard Penetration test
3) (IS 2720 part 4) : Methods of test for soils part 4,grain size analysis
4) (IS 2720 part 5) : Methods of test for soils part 5 Determination of liquid and plastic
limits
5) (IS 2720 part 10) : Methods of test for soils part 10, determination of unconfined
compression test.
6) (IS 2720 part 11) : Methods of test for soils part 10, determination of unconfined
compression test, determination of shear strength parameters of soil specimen tested in
unconsolidated un drained triaxial compression without the measurement of pore water
pressure (amendment 3) Reaffirmed 1990 CED 23
7) (IS 2720 part 15) : Methods os test for soils part 15, Determination of consolidation
properties.
8) (IS 2720 part 13) : Methods of test for soils part 13, Direct Shear Test.

9) (IS 6403 -1981) : Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow
foundations.
10) Settlement Consideration :(IS: 8009 (Part-I)-1976 Reaffirmed 2003)
FREE HEAD
FIXED HEAD