Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson Agenda with Discipline-Specific Learning Activities- reference your content methods text
Time: Teacher Will Be (Planned Supports tied to Students Will Be (Learning Tasks connect Rationale: (Based on
objectives & build in checks for understanding) to prior knowledge & assets): Research/theory)
5 minutes -Greeting students and putting up -Gathering the materials that they - Mental breaks
Nearpod link on the board need, interacting with their peers -Need for social
interaction
(Vygotsky)
35 minutes -Ms. Haag will facilitate the Nearpod on -Interacting with the Nearpod -Differentiated
an overview of WWII (writing, drawing, virtual reality, learning. Students
-Ms. Haag will float around to answer and polls) can work through a
individual questions and help with -Reading parts of the lecture slides variety of different
technology issues out loud things (writing,
-Mrs. Beiswenger will observe and take -Asking questions over confusing drawing, etc.)
notes over the lesson content -Supporting during
learning styles
5 minutes -Ms. Haag will facilitate a classroom -Students will be reflecting on the -Students get a say
discussion where students bring up lesson over what they are
subjects, they want to learn more about -Students will be raising topics that going to learn
-Mrs. Beiswenger will write down the are of interest of them (Ginnot)
topics, so that she can include them in
future lessons
I was incredibly impressed with the amount of engagement that this lesson procured from the students. With every
activity, Nearpod told me I had over 92% participation, which is higher than I would’ve aimed for. On the Time to
Climb 23/27 of the students achieved an 80%. I do think there were a lot of questions when I explained more complex
concepts like fascism, so I would spend more time on these topics. I think there are still some students who struggle
with more abstract concept. I would have students explain nationalism, fascism, and militarism to each other,
supported by the Zone of Proximal Development.
PLANNING COMMENTARY
Respond to the prompts below (no more than 7 single-spaced pages, including prompts) by typing your responses within the
brackets. Do not delete or alter the prompts. Pages exceeding the maximum will not be scored.
1. Central Focus
a. Describe the focus and purpose of this lesson within the context of the unit.
[The unit is the second world war. The just finished a unit on the Great Depression and the New
Deal. This lesson was their first lesson on WWII, so it served as an introduction and overview of
the global conflict]
b. Given the focus and purpose of the lesson describe how the standards and learning
objectives are connected
[The standard should include information about the multiple causes of WWII and how the United
States was eventually drawn in. This include and introduction to complex, abstract political
terms such as fascism, nationalism, and militarism. These terms serve as introduction for the
rest of the unit]
a. How did your teacher’s understanding of the students’ prior academic learning and
personal, cultural, and community assets guided the choice or adaptation of learning
tasks and materials. Be explicit about the connections between the learning tasks and
students’ prior academic learning, their assets, and research/theory.
[This lesson began with a reminder about previous lessons that relate to this topic where
students shared what they remember. They then shared what they had learned in prior classes
about WWII. This way, we could see a path for where learning should go based on what tools
they already have. My teacher made sure to remind me to repeat instructions because several
students with ADHD struggle with remembering and following instructions.]
b. Describe and justify why the instructional strategies and planned supports are
appropriate for the whole class, individuals, and/or groups of students with specific
learning needs. Reference your content methods text.
Consider the variety of learners in your class who may require different strategies/support
(e.g., students with IEPs or 504 plans, English language learners, struggling readers,
underperforming students or those with gaps in academic knowledge, and/or gifted
students).
[This lesson relied heavily on technology which is an extremely student-centered method of
instruction. It also had a variety of different tasks where students could exercise their diverse
strengths. It also was easier for my students with attention disorders to focus when the method
of instruction changed and wasn’t just a lecture. I also started to use concept formation to give
them a way of conceptualizing abstract historical concepts]
c. Describe common errors or misunderstandings students tend to have related to the
content focused on in this lesson and how the teacher worked to address them.
[Understanding abstract concepts such as fascism, militarism, and nationalism were hard for the
students, and they had a lot of questions about what this meant. To address this, we dwelled on
it for a long period of time and provided concrete examples for abstract concepts. For example, I
talked about Hitler used nationalism to start his campaign]
4. Supporting Development Through Language
As you respond to prompts 4a–d, consider the range of students’ language assets and
needs—what do students already know, what are they struggling with, and/or what is new to
them?
a. Language Function (Bloom’s Taxonomy level of Objective) Below are some
examples of language functions that may have been used in the lesson plan’s
objective/outcome. Identify the objectives/outcomes in your lesson plan under
study.
Consider the variety of learners in your class who may require different strategies/support
(e.g., students with IEPs or 504 plans, English language learners, struggling readers,
underperforming students or those with gaps in academic knowledge, and/or gifted
students).
[By using Nearpod, I could see that every student was participating and achieving a certain level
of success. I could identify the students that were struggling and offer them additional
assistance]
Lesson Plan Evaluation Rubric Criteria to Use for the Lesson Plan Under Study
Planning for Understandings: How does the lesson plan build students’ abilities to construct
meaning?
There are significant Some standards, objectives, Plans for instruction Plans for instruction
content inaccuracies that and learning tasks are include activities that include student-focused
will lead to student visible in the planning clearly support strategies/activities that
misunderstandings. process. Plans for standards/objectives build on each other to
OR instruction support student attainment. Activities build support learning with clear
Standards, objectives, and learning of facts and on each other to support alignment to objectives.
learning tasks and materials procedures. learning.
are not aligned with each AND
other. Consideration of AND AND Activities are selected that
developmental need is Activities are selected that Activities are selected that meet several
absent meet at least 1 meet at least 2 developmental needs.
developmental need. developmental needs.
Planning to Support Varied Student Learning Needs: How does the teacher use knowledge of
his/her/their students to target support for students?
There is no evidence of Planned supports are Planned supports are tied Planned supports are tied
planned supports. loosely to learning objectives to learning objectives
OR tied to learning AND AND
Teacher does not attend to objectives. UDL attention is applied to UDL attention is applied to
ANY INSTRUCTIONAL the the characteristics of the
requirements in IEPs and characteristics of the class as a whole and
504 plans. class as a whole. individuals with specific
needs
Using Knowledge of Students to Inform Teaching and Learning: How does the teacher use
knowledge of his/her/their students to justify instructional planning?
Candidate’s justification of Teachers learning tasks The teacher can justify The teacher justifies why
learning tasks is either Pay limited attention to why learning tasks (or their learning tasks (or their
missing students’ adaptations) are adaptations) are
OR • prior academic learning appropriate using appropriate using examples
represents a OR examples of students’ of students’
deficit view of students and • personal, cultural, or • prior academic • prior academic learning
their backgrounds. community assets. learning AND
OR • personal, cultural, or
• personal, cultural, or community assets as
community assets. connected to research
The connection to research and/or theory. Reference
and/or theory are your content methods
superficial.
text
Identifying and Supporting Academic Language Demands: How does the teacher support and
develop the use of content-specific vocabulary and academic language?
Academic language isn’t Teacher supports provide Teacher supports provide Teacher supports provide
addressed. opportunities primarily for opportunities for students explicit opportunities for
student to use limited to use academic students to use academic
academic vocabulary in a vocabulary and to vocabulary and to
general way. \ demonstrate its use at basic demonstrate its use at
language functions higher language functions.
appropriate to the task.
Planning Assessments to Monitor and Support Student Learning: How are the informal and formal
assessments selected or designed to monitor students’ progress toward the standards/objectives?
The teacher doesn’t The teacher provides least The teacher provides at The teacher provides
monitor students’ progress one assessment least one assessment multiple opportunities
or the assessment is to monitor students’ to monitor students’ and forms of assessments
misaligned to progress that is loosely progress that is clearly to monitor students’
objectives/outcomes stated aligned to aligned to progress that are strongly
in the plan. objectives/outcomes stated objectives/outcomes stated and clearly aligned to
in the plan. in the plan. objectives/outcomes stated
in the plan.
Specific Support Who will provide that Why? What’s the intention -Nearpod: Has the lecture notes on slides, written
discussion boards, drawing boards, polls, visual
Needed (Special support? Where will that representations, virtual reality field trip, and Time to
Education Support support be provided? Climb activity
and/or
accommodations
and
modifications)
Lesson Agenda with Discipline-Specific Learning Activities- reference your content methods text.
Time: Teacher Will Be (Planned Supports tied to Students Will Be (Learning Tasks connect Rationale: (Based on
objectives & build in checks for understanding) to prior knowledge & assets): Research/theory)
10 minutes -Greeting students and putting up -Gathering the materials that they - Mental breaks
Nearpod link on the board need, interacting with their peers -Need for social
-Introduce the lesson and ask them what -Sharing what they already know interaction
they already know/ relate back to (Vygotsky)
previous lessons -Activating prior
knowledge
30 minutes -Ms. Haag will facilitate the Nearpod on -Interacting with the Nearpod -Differentiated
an overview of WWII (writing, drawing, virtual reality, learning. Students
-Ms. Haag will float around to answer and polls) can work through a
individual questions and help with -Reading parts of the lecture slides variety of different
technology issues out loud things (writing,
-Mrs. Beiswenger will observe and take -Asking questions over confusing drawing, etc.)
notes over the lesson content -Multiple
Intelligences
(Gardner)
-Supporting during
learning styles
5 minutes -Ms. Haag will facilitate a classroom -Students will be reflecting on the -Students get a say
discussion where students bring up lesson over what they are
subjects, they want to learn more about -Students will be raising topics that going to learn
-Mrs. Beiswenger will write down the are of interest of them (Ginnot)
topics, so that she can include them in
future lessons
I was incredibly impressed with the amount of engagement that this lesson procured from the students. With every
activity, Nearpod told me I had over 92% participation, which is higher than I think occurs in a lecture styles lesson. On the
Time to Climb 23/27 of the students achieved an 80%. I do think there were a lot of questions when I explained more
complex concepts like fascism, so I would spend more time on these topics. I think there are still some students who
struggle with more abstract concept. I would have students explain nationalism, fascism, and militarism to each other,
supported by the Zone of Proximal Development. I also would place more emphasis on concept formation with fascism
and nationalism. I would anticipate that this would minimize the confusion about the topics.