Professional Documents
Culture Documents
“An Aggie does not lie, cheat or steal or tolerate those who do”
Abstract(Maha Al-Emadi)
This project aims to address high 𝐶𝑂2 emissions in Qatar, by finding a viable solution to combat these high
𝐶𝑂2 emissions. Carbon capturing and storage (CCUS) is a vital process of removing 𝐶𝑂2 from the
atmosphere. This solution was found after a design process that involved us looking into other solutions to
combat this problem. Our CCUS has research backing up its findings and could be proposed as a viable
system. Our CCUS consists of 4 subsystems, which all work together to combat this issue.
Figure 1- Qatar’s 𝐶𝑂2 emissions, in million tons per year (Ritchie & Roser, 2020)
Qatar’s Vision 2030 specifically dwells on how us as a society needs to work on ways to reduce global
warming effects (Qatar National Vision 2030 2008) (Qatar National Vision 2030). Consequently, Qatar
released its updated ‘Nationally Determined Contribution’ to the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC), which highlights how the peninsula aims to reduce GHG emissions by 25% in
2030 (Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) 2021). This awareness led our team to research on the
effects of high 𝐶𝑂2 emissions and to come up with a solution to decrease the 𝐶𝑂2 emissions in Qatar to leave
a better Earth for future generations.
Purpose (Busira Lassiss)
The main purpose of this project is to find a viable solution that would reduce emissions by the power stations
in Qatar, whilst keeping our solution aligned with Qatar’s Vision 2030.
This issue effects everyone in Qatar, no matter which demographic they are. However, since we are looking at
ways to combat the high 𝐶𝑂2 emissions in Qatar, our focus would be the LNG power stations itself, since
majority of the emissions originates from this industry.
The purpose will be achieved when a workable method is found by which per capita carbon dioxide emissions
can be lowered. We would refer to these solutions as a Carbon Mitigation system. Our solution needs to be
realistic, and the country’s economic background should be kept in mind. The solutions also need to be
politically popular so there can be legislation and execution in place, which can quickly get the solution
implemented.
Mainly, it must be noted that our solution must be feasible to LNG power stations. This means our solutions
should be economically feasible at lowering 𝐶𝑂2 emissions and be sustainable. Additionally, if our solution
impacts the general population, we will also need to make sure that incentives are provided to motivate the
general population to pursue a greener future.
Figure 2- 𝐶𝑂2 emissions per year in sectors (Qatar 𝐶𝑂2 Emissions - Worldometer, n.d.)
Figure 2 shows how the percentage of 𝐶𝑂2 emissions due to the Power Industry increased throughout the
years. Take note that majority of other industrial combustion processes are closely linked to the Power
Industry. To reduce the emission of Carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, Qatar has initiated a climate change
action plan after the release of Qatar Vision 2030. The country’s plans include becoming the largest Liquified
Natural Gas producer in the world, by 2030, as mentioned in the vision. The industry of fossil fuels is one of
the main threats of climate change and carbon dioxide emissions. Therefore, the country has introduced a plan
of carbon capture and storage/utilization within the liquified natural gas production and storage process (Qatar
aims to reduce its GHG emissions by 25% in 2030). The country is working on a plan to capture and store
approximately five million tons of carbon dioxide emissions annually, by 2025, as mentioned by the energy
affairs minister, Saad Al-Kaabi, during the 40th oil and money conference in London. This process benefits
Qatar both environmentally and economically, since this process targets as well as focuses on becoming the
largest Liquified Natural Gas producer in the world (Qatar to store more than 5m tons of 𝐶𝑂2 a year by 2025
2019)
Carbon Capture Storage & Utilization (CCUS)
Different sectors of the industry are becoming huge implementers of Carbon Capture, Storage & Utilization
(CCUS) systems. CCUS is a three-step process, involving separation, transportation, and storage/utilization of
𝐶𝑂2 . The process depends mainly on the chemical features of 𝐶𝑂2 gas. Essentially, 𝐶𝑂2 is captured via a
chemical reaction, and via a series of Chemical Plants, is reused for other purposes. Carbon Capture
techniques that have been found include absorption, cryogenic, membrane separation, adsorption, and
chemical looping. Chemical absorption is the most popular method of capturing 𝐶𝑂2 . However, a lot of
energy is required for this method. If we investigate on CCUS further, we will research on the most efficient
method and look for areas of development.
Globally, a variety of CCUS systems are already under operation. The largest plant is situated in the USA and
is called the ‘Century Plant’. This plant has a capture rate of 8.4 Megatons of 𝐶𝑂2 per year. The process of
running such a plant is very costly, but the benefits to the atmosphere from the dangers of carbon dioxide
emission are very noticeable. Carbon dioxide captured by the plant is therefore stored and used as well in
several industrial operations, such as Occidental Petroleum EOR project in the Permian Basin (North
America). We would analyze what makes Century plant different from all the other CCUS plants across the
globe, to benefit from the experiences of such a large project and understanding the positive and negative
impacts of running a huge carbon capturing plant, where Qatar can benefit from.
After the design process, we chose CCUS as the solution we would work on. It was clear that CCUS had a
variety of issues related to it, as highlighted previously. Nevertheless, we realized that this was the most practical
solution for now.
The flue gas enters the 𝐶𝑂2 Capturer, where 𝐶𝑂2 is separated from the remaining components of the flue gas.
The treated flue gas exits out the 𝐶𝑂2 capture into the atmosphere. This process alone reduces C𝐶𝑂2 O2
emissions from the LNG power stations, which would achieve our objective. Nevertheless, an effective
solution should look into all complexities of the problem. The captured and then compressed 𝐶𝑂2 gas cannot
be left as it is, it must be either stored or utilized in some way (hence Carbon Capture, Utilization and
Storage).
Our system allows the 𝐶𝑂2 gas to be utilized in ways that are proven very beneficial to society (would be
elaborated later). Additionally, our CCUS allows flexibility in letting the users of our solution choose what to
do with the 𝐶𝑂2 produced. There may be cases when too much 𝐶𝑂2 is captured, and not all of it can be
utilized. That’s where our Underground Storage system comes into play.
What separates our solution from the ones available on the market is that for one, our solution is effective to
use in Qatar. Our solution makes the high 𝐶𝑂2 emissions in Qatar advantageous to its economy, since we have
found new ways of utilizing 𝐶𝑂2 efficiently. Additionally, our CCUS is powered by both Solar Energy and
Natural Gas. This is an effective strategy to implement in Qatar since this country is mainly sunny. This
would lead to a smaller decrease in the power efficiency of the LNG power stations.
The Carbon Capture System captures 𝐶𝑂2 and compresses it for utilization or storage. Our subsystem works
on the ‘Chemical Absorption’ Technique, which is a 2-stage process. First, an amine solution captures 𝐶𝑂2
via a chemical reaction between 𝐶𝑂2 and the solvent to form liquid rich in 𝐶𝑂2 . This rich liquid enters the
stripper, where the 𝐶𝑂2 is recovered by the addition of heat energy. Hence, 𝐶𝑂2 is captured (Chemical
Absorption - an Overview | ScienceDirect Topics, n.d.). Figure 7 show the reaction of 𝐶𝑂2 with the solvent in
the Absorber (Absorption) and the Stripper (Desorption) respectively.
The difference between our Carbon Capturing System and the majority of the systems available in the market
is in the solvent used. Our solvent consists of a mixture of Monoethanolamine (MEA) and
Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA). Most Carbon Capturing systems in today’s world use only MEA. The MEA-
MDEA solvent our system utilizes allows less energy. Figures 8 compares the efficiency of the CCUS when
using MEA-MDEA as compared to using only MEA at 95% 𝐶𝑂2 removal (Aroonwilas & Veawab, 2007).
Figure 8- Net efficiency of CCUS vs % Carbon Dioxide removal, compared between MEA-MDEA and MEA (Aroonwilas & Veawab,
2007).
Dry Reforming
Figure 9 outlines the Dry Reforming Process of our CCUS.
This process is 1 of 2 processes that utilizes the captured 𝐶𝑂2 to make products that are needed in other
industries. The Dry Reforming (DR) Process takes in 𝐶𝑂2 from the Carbon Capturer, and Hydrocarbons (from
oil reservoirs), to form Carbon Monoxide (CO) and Hydrogen gas (𝐻2 ). Hydrogen gas is used in multiple
other industries.
Figure 10 shows the chemical reaction that takes place in the DR process. A catalyst is necessary to make the
DR process possible. However, DR is still an expensive process. A lot of energy is required in DR, which
could potentially lead to a lower net 𝐶𝑂2 captured if implemented in our CCUS. Nevertheless, we have found
out methods of making DR more feasible to implement. This DR process uses a new type of catalyst and
another method of preparing the catalyst. A catalyst is a substance that speeds up the rate of a reaction,
without getting used up in the process. The catalyst would be placed in the Reformer in Figure 8.
Figure 10- Dry reforming reaction overview (Niu et al., 2020)
Instead of using the conventional Nickel Aluminum Oxide catalyst, our catalyst incorporates Platinum. This
would improve the efficiency of the DR process. Figure 11 illustrates this statement. It can be seen that
blending these two metals would lead to a significant decrease in the amount of 𝐶𝑂2 that would be lost
(García-Diéguez et al., 2010).
Figure 11- Carbon Dioxide Conversion loss when using different types of catalysts (García-Diéguez et al., 2010)
Additionally, our catalyst would be produced via the reverse microemulsion method (ME). This method
allows composite materials to be manufactured on the nanoscale. It works on 2 aqueous phases containing the
metal salts that merge and react with each other (Kaiser et al., n.d.).
The ME method leads to a more stable catalyst. Figure ‘’ illustrates this. It can be seen that the ME method
leads to a more consistent 𝐶𝑂2 % conversion rate than the Impregnation method (García-Diéguez et al., 2010).
Underground Storage
Underground storage allows captured 𝐶𝑂2 to be stored until its needed. Our solution incorporates this because
we realized that it is very likely a large amount of 𝐶𝑂2 can be captured at times, and it would ‘overflow’ all
other 𝐶𝑂2 lines. Therefore, it seemed logical to have a place to store the 𝐶𝑂2 . The gas can be stored in already
existing oil reservoirs in Qatar. This storage method in fact leads to ‘enhanced oil recovery’, meaning that oil
underground in Qatar can be extracted more easily. This sub-system effectively provides a benefit to our
solution as well as a benefit to the LNG power stations.
Conclusion
The main purpose of our design was to propose a suitable solution regarding 𝐶𝑂2 emission in Qatar. The
proposed solution shows significant levels of success and efficiency, even though the process is time and
money consuming. Qatar is therefore able to initiate such projects, that will therefore provide positive impacts
on economic and social development as well as environmental. Nevertheless, it should be clear that 𝐶𝑂2
emissions from urban areas are also high. Global warming effects will be reduced due to reducing 𝐶𝑂2
emissions from industry, but Qatar people will still emit 𝐶𝑂2 into the atmosphere on a daily basis. To ensure a
fool proof solution model to effectively eradicate this problem, it is important to develop other solution
models that targets Qatar’s society, to ensure maximum effectiveness and positive results, and to therefore
eliminate Global Warming issues in Qatar as much as possible.
Works Cited
I) Approaches to reducing carbon dioxide emissions in the built environment in Qatar. GORD Institute.
(n.d.). Retrieved April 3, 2022, from https://institute.gord.qa/projects/approaches-to-reducing-carbon-
dioxide-emissions-in-the-built-environment-in-qatar/
II) Climate change impacts. Climate change impacts | National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. (n.d.). Retrieved April 3, 2022, from https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-
collections/climate/climate-change-impacts
III) Environment. QF Stories RSS. (n.d.). Retrieved April 3, 2022, from
https://www.qf.org.qa/stories/environment
IV) National Geographic Society. (2019, March 27). Climate change. National Geographic Society.
Retrieved April 3, 2022, from https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/climate-change/
V) Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). (2021, August). Nationally Determined Contribution
(NDC). State of Qatar.
VI) Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). (2021, August). Retrieved April 3, 2022, from
https://www.gco.gov.qa/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/GCO-QNV-English.pdf
VII) Qatar aims to reduce its GHG emissions by 25% in 2030. Enerdata. (2021, October 29). Retrieved
April 3, 2022, from https://www.enerdata.net/publications/daily-energy-news/qatar-aims-reduce-its-
ghg-emissions-25-2030.html
VIII) Qatar General Health Risks: Air Pollution. IAMAT. (n.d.). Retrieved April 3, 2022, from
https://www.iamat.org/country/qatar/risk/air-pollution
IX) Qatar National Vision 2030. (2008, July). Retrieved April 3, 2022, from https://www.gco.gov.qa/wp-
content/uploads/2016/09/GCO-QNV-English.pdf
X) Qatar to store more than 5m tons of CO2 a year by 2025. Qatar to store more than 5M tons of CO2 a
year by 2025. (2019, October). Retrieved April 3, 2022, from
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/energy/projects/qatar-to-store-more-than-5m-tons-of-co2-a-year-by-
2025/26924
XI) Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2020, May 11). Qatar: CO2 Country Profile. Our World in Data. Retrieved
April 3, 2022, from https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/qatar
XII) Shannak, S. (2022, February 23). How Qatar manages economic growth and CO2 emissions. Fair
Observer. Retrieved April 3, 2022, from
https://www.fairobserver.com/region/middle_east_north_africa/saad-shannak-qatar-economic-
growth-carbon-emissions-qatari-news-gulf-khaleej-arab-world-
84393/#:~:text=The%20country%20is%20also%20a,when%20compared%20to%20global%20averag
es
XIII) Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2020). CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Our World in Data.
https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/qatar
XIV) Qatar CO2 Emissions - Worldometer. (n.d.). Www.worldometers.info.
https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/qatar-co2-emissions/
XV)
XVI) Developing low-carbon technologies. (2020, June 17). IOGP.
https://www.iogp.org/blog/news/developing-low-carbon-technologies/
XVII) Qatar: volume of solar energy combined capacity 2018. (n.d.). Statista. Retrieved April 27, 2022, from
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1089176/qatar-volume-of-solar-energy-combined-capacity/
XVIII) Chemical Absorption - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. (n.d.). Www.sciencedirect.com. Retrieved
April 27, 2022, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/chemical-
absorption#:~:text=Chemical%20absorption%20method%20takes%20advantage
XIX) Aroonwilas, A., & Veawab, A. (2007). Integration of CO2 capture unit using single- and blended-
amines into supercritical coal-fired power plants: Implications for emission and energy
management. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1(2), 143–150.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00011-4
XX) Kaiser, M., Ma, Z., Wang, X., Han, F., Gao, T., Kaiser, M., Rejaul, Ma, Z., Wang, X., Han, F., Gao,
T., Fan, X., Liu, J., & Kun, H. (n.d.). Reverse Microemulsion Synthesis of Sulfur/ Graphene Composite
for Lithium/Sulfur Batteries Publication Details.
https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=3797&context=aiimpape
rs#:~:text=In%20the%20w%2Fo%20microemulsion
XXI) García-Diéguez, M., Pieta, I. S., Herrera, M. C., Larrubia, M. A., & Alemany, L. J. (2010). Improved
Pt-Ni nanocatalysts for dry reforming of methane. Applied Catalysis A: General, 377(1), 191–199.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.01.038
XXII) Brigham, D. (2019, July 3). Innovative Materials: Carbon Fibers Made from Algae. Civil + Structural
Engineer Magazine. https://csengineermag.com/innovative-materials-carbon-fibers-made-from-
algae/
XXIII) Ochedi, F. O., Yu, J., Yu, H., Liu, Y., & Hussain, A. (2020). Carbon dioxide capture using liquid
absorption methods: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 19(1), 77–109.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01093-8
XXIV) Niu, J., Guo, F., Ran, J., Qi, W., & Yang, Z. (2020). Methane dry (CO2) reforming to syngas (H2/CO)
in catalytic process: From experimental study and DFT calculations. International Journal of
Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.067
Appendix
Appendix A