You are on page 1of 72

Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core

═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Design Process for


Completions and
Workovers Core

T
Design Process

H
IG
R
PY

Learning Objectives

This section will cover the following learning objectives:


O

 Explain the work product of a completions engineer


 Describe an initial completion procedure and sketch
 Translate chronological steps from a procedure to a well sketch
C

 Recognize and describe morning reports


 Recognize the engineering that is required for developing a
procedure

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 1
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Work Product of a Completions Engineer

Pre-sketch
The classic work
product of a completion/ Proposed sketch
workover engineer
Procedure

T
H
IG
R
PY

Work Product of a Completions Engineer


O
C

1 Engineering team develops the procedure

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 2
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Work Product of a Completions Engineer

T
H
2 Operations team executes procedure in the field
IG
R
PY

Work Product of a Completions Engineer


O
C

3 Work is documented through a series of morning reports

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 3
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Work Product of a Completions Engineer

T
H
4 Completions or work over engineer will review the

IG
reports and discuss work status with operations team
R
PY

Work Product of a Completions Engineer


O
C

5 Engineer uses morning reports to complete final


well sketch

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 4
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Completions, Workovers, Interventions


Completions  The first time a newly drilled well is worked on to put
the well into production
Workovers  The procedure would also include steps to remove
equipment currently in the well, before proceeding
with the rest of the operation
 Usually, although not always, a workover implies
removing existing equipment from the well before
proceeding
Interventions  Includes going inside existing equipment for a specific

T
reason, but not removing the equipment

H
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 5
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Sketches and Procedures – Initial Completion


Pre-sketch Procedure Proposed Sketch
1. MIRU SL
2. Hold safety meeting. Make gauge ring run to PBTD est. 7850’,
send results to Engineering.
Well left 3. RDMO SL
with 10 4. If approval to proceed, MIRU completion rig
5. Make bit and scraper run to PBTD
2 7/8” 6.5
ppg mud 6. TIH with open ended workstring, displace hole with 9.8 ppg KCL ppf API EUE
in casing completion fluid. N-80 tubing
when Note: expected reservoir pressure is 3600 psi at 7500’. 9.8 ppg
drilling rig fluid will provide a 222 psi OB.
moved off 7. Test casing to 5000 psi for 15 minutes
location. 8. MIRU EL unit, hold explosives safety meeting and conduct JSA.
RIH and perforate 7500-7570’ (reference OH log dated Nov 9, SSD at 7390’
2016) with 4 5/8” gun loaded 6 spf, 60 deg phasing,32 gm RDX Model MJG
charges packer set at
9. POOH with guns, check that all shots have fired, if not, inform
7400’

T
Engineering
10. Monitor hole conditions for 4 hours, report any fluid loss or XN at 7405’
pressure build up
11. If well stable, TIH with completion string consisting of MS WL WEG at 7410’

H
reentry guide, XN landing nipple, model MJG mechanical Perforations
retrievable packer, sliding side door, and 2 7/8” 6.5 #/ft tubing. Set 7500’-7570’
packer at 7400’.
12. MIRU SL, set plug in lower XN nipple, test tubing to 5000 psi for
MD. Note, top
15 min. RDMO SL. sand at 7500’,
bottom sand at
7” 32#/ft casing
run to 8000’ with
PBTD at 7850’
IG
13. Test backside to 5000 psi for 15 min.
14. Install BPV, ND BOPs, NU 5000 psi tree and flowlines, pull BPV,
turn well over to Production
15. If required, use lease gas to rock well in, open on 16/64 ck.
7610’.
R
PY

Sketches and Procedures – Initial Completion


Pre-sketch Procedure Proposed Sketch
1. MIRU SL
2. Hold safety meeting. Make gauge ring run to PBTD est. 7850’,
O

send results to Engineering.


Well left 3. RDMO SL
with 10 4. If approval to proceed, MIRU completion rig
5. Make bit and scraper run to PBTD
2 7/8” 6.5
ppg mud 6. TIH with open ended workstring, displace hole with 9.8 ppg KCL ppf API EUE
in casing
C

completion fluid. N-80 tubing


when Note: expected reservoir pressure is 3600 psi at 7500’. 9.8 ppg
drilling rig fluid will provide a 222 psi OB.
7. The
Test casing
moved off welltoin5000
thepsicurrent
for 15 minutes
(original) condition.
location. 8. MIRU EL unit, hold explosives safety meeting and conduct JSA.
RIH and perforate 7500-7570’ (reference OH log dated Nov 9, SSD at 7390’
For
2016)New Completion:
with 4 5/8” This
gun loaded 6 spf, isphasing,32
60 deg generally the way the
gm RDX Model MJG
charges rig left the well, so it is usually simple. Note
drilling packer set at
9. POOH with guns, check that all shots have fired, if not, inform
that by tradition we do not show other casing strings 7400’
Engineering
10. nor thehole
Monitor wellhead. But
conditions for these
4 hours, can
report anybe important,
fluid loss or so do XN at 7405’
pressure
not build that
forget up other casing stings exist in the well and
11. If well stable, TIH with completion string consisting of MS WL WEG at 7410’
that
reentrythere is something
guide, XN landing nipple, on
modelthe
MJG top.
mechanical Perforations
retrievable packer, sliding side door, and 2 7/8” 6.5 #/ft tubing. Set 7500’-7570’
packerWorkover:
For at 7400’. This sketch may be very complicated,
12. MIRU SL, set plug in lower XN nipple, test tubing to 5000 psi for
MD. Note, top
with lots
15 min. RDMO of equipment
SL. already in the well! sand at 7500’,
13. Test backside to 5000 psi for 15 min. bottom sand at
7” 32#/ft casing 14. Install BPV, ND BOPs, NU 5000 psi tree and flowlines, pull BPV, 7610’.
run to 8000’ with turn well over to Production
PBTD at 7850’ 15. If required, use lease gas to rock well in, open on 16/64 ck.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 6
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Sketches and Procedures – Initial Completion


Pre-sketch Procedure Proposed Sketch
1. MIRU SL
2. Hold safety meeting. Make gauge ring run to PBTD est. 7850’,
send results to Engineering.
Well left 3. RDMO SL
with 10 4. If approval to proceed, MIRU completion rig
5. Make bit and scraper run to PBTD
2 7/8” 6.5
ppg mud 6. TIH with open ended workstring, displace hole with 9.8 ppg KCL ppf API EUE
A series of chronologically
in casing
when
completion fluid. organized stepsN-80thattubing
the
Note: expected reservoir pressure is 3600 psi at 7500’. 9.8 ppg
drilling rig fluid will provide a 222 psi OB. operations team should
moved off 7. Test casing to 5000 psi for 15 minutes follow to get to the
location. 8. MIRU EL unit, hold explosives safety meeting and conduct JSA. proposed sketch.
RIH and perforate 7500-7570’ (reference OH log dated Nov 9, SSD at 7390’
2016) with 4 5/8” gun loaded 6 spf, 60 deg phasing,32 gm RDX Model MJG
charges Generally involves placing
packer set at
9. POOH with guns, check that all shots have fired, if not, inform items into the well or pulling
7400’

T
Engineering
10. Monitor hole conditions for 4 hours, report any fluid loss or them out of the XNwell, and
at 7405’
pressure build up doing so in such a manner
11. If well stable, TIH with completion string consisting of MS WL WEG at 7410’
that the reservoir pressure

H
reentry guide, XN landing nipple, model MJG mechanical Perforations
retrievable packer, sliding side door, and 2 7/8” 6.5 #/ft tubing. Set is always contained – no
7500’-7570’
packer at 7400’. unwanted flow of reservoir
12. MIRU SL, set plug in lower XN nipple, test tubing to 5000 psi for
MD. Note, top
fluids to the surface!
sand at 7500’,
15 min. RDMO SL.
bottom sand at
7” 32#/ft casing
run to 8000’ with
PBTD at 7850’
IG
13. Test backside to 5000 psi for 15 min.
14. Install BPV, ND BOPs, NU 5000 psi tree and flowlines, pull BPV,
turn well over to Production
15. If required, use lease gas to rock well in, open on 16/64 ck.
7610’.
R
PY

Sketches and Procedures: Terminology


1. MIRU SL
2. Hold safety meeting. Make gauge ring run to PBTD est. 7850’, send
results to Engineering.
O

3. RDMO SL
4. If approval to proceed, MIRU completion rig
MIRU – move in and rig up 5. Make bit and scraper run to PBTD
SL – slick line unit 6. TIH with open ended workstring, displace hole with 9.8 ppg KCL
EL – electric line completion fluid.
C

Note: expected reservoir pressure is 3600 psi at 7500’. 9.8 ppg fluid
RDMO – rig down and move off will provide a 222 psi OB.
PBTD – plug back total depth 7. Test casing to 5000 psi for 15 minutes
TIH – trip in hole; usually jointed pipe 8. MIRU EL unit, hold explosives safety meeting and conduct JSA. RIH
and perforate 7500-7570’ (reference OH log dated Nov 9, 2016) with 4
TOOH – trip out of hole; usually jointed 5/8” gun loaded 6 spf, 60 deg phasing,32 gm RDX charges
pipe 9. POOH with guns, check that all shots have fired, if not, inform
RIH – run in hole, often not pipe Engineering
10. Monitor hole conditions for 4 hours, report any fluid loss or pressure
(e.g., wireline or coiled tubing) build up
POOH – pull out of hole 11. If well stable, TIH with completion string consisting of MS WL
ND – nipple down (unfasten bolts; reentry guide, XN landing nipple, model MJG mechanical retrievable
packer, sliding side door, and 2 7/8” 6.5 #/ft tubing. Set packer at
usually for a BOP or tree) 7400’.
NU – nipple up 12. MIRU SL, set plug in lower XN nipple, test tubing to 5000 psi for 15
min. RDMO SL.
13. Test backside to 5000 psi for 15 min.
14. Install BPV, ND BOPs, NU 5000 psi tree and flowlines, pull BPV, turn
well over to Production
15. If required, use lease gas to rock well in, open on 16/64 ck.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 7
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Sketches and Procedures

Pre-sketch 1. MIRU SL Proposed Sketch


2. Hold safety meeting. Make gauge ring run to PBTD est. 7850’, send results 2 7/8” 6.5
to Engineering. ppf API EUE
This isSLwhat the completion engineer wants to
3. RDMO
N-80 tubing
Well left 4. If approval to proceed, MIRU completion rig
get to – the final state of the well. There is a lot
5. Make bit and scraper run to PBTD
with 10 SSD at 7390’
of engineering
6. TIH that goes
with open ended workstring, into hole
displace thiswith
sketch;
9.8 ppg which
KCL
ppg mud
in casing is the overall
completion fluid. subject of this skill module.
Note: expected reservoir pressure is 3600 psi at 7500’. 9.8 ppg fluid will Model MJG
when Consider for now several questions:
provide a 222 psi OB. packer set at
drilling rig 7. Test casing to 5000 psi for 15 minutes 7400’
moved off  Why
8. MIRU perforate
EL unit, thatsafety
hold explosives interval?
meeting and conduct JSA. RIH and
perforate 7500-7570’ (reference OH log dated Nov 9, 2016) with 4 5/8” gun XN at 7405’
location. loaded
Why just perforate, and not frac or gravel
6 spf, 60 deg phasing,32 gm RDX charges
9. POOH pack?
with guns, check that all shots have fired, if not, inform Engineering WEG at 7410’
10. Monitor
Why holerun that packer
conditions and
for 4 hours, that
report sizeloss
any fluid tubing?
or pressure build
up

T
 Why run tubing at all?
11. If well stable, TIH with completion string consisting of MS WL reentry
Perforations
7500’-7570’
guide, XN landing nipple, model MJG mechanical retrievable packer,
sliding side door, and 2 7/8” 6.5 #/ft tubing. Set packer at 7400’. MD. Note, top
12. MIRU SL, set plug in lower XN nipple, test tubing to 5000 psi for 15 min. sand at 7500’,

H
RDMO SL. bottom sand at
13. Test backside to 5000 psi for 15 min. 7610’.
14. Install BPV, ND BOPs, NU 5000 psi tree and flowlines, pull BPV, turn well
over to Production
15. If required, use lease gas to rock well in, open on 16/64 ck.

7” 32#/ft casing
run to 8000’ with
PBTD at 7850’
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 8
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Sketches and Procedures – Intervention


Pre Sketch Proposed Sketch
Procedure

1. MIRU SL
2. Hold safety meeting. Make
gauge ring run to PBTD est.
7850’, send results to
Engineering. Note any sand or
obstructions inside the tubing.
3. Make up lock mandrel with
pressure gauges for XN
landing nipple at 7405’.
4. Run lock mandrel and set in
XN nipple, hang off gauges,
pull running tool.

T
5. RDMO SL

H
IG
R
PY

Sketches and Procedures – Intervention


Pre Sketch Proposed Sketch
Procedure
O

 2 7/8” 6.5 ppf API 1. MIRU SL


EUE N-80 tubing
2 7/8” 6.5 ppf API EUE N-80 tubing
2. Hold safety meeting. Make SSD at 7390’
 SSD at 7390’
gauge ring run to PBTD est. Model MJG packer set at 7400’
 Model MJG packer set
at 7400’ 7850’, send results to XN at 7405’
C

 XN at 7405’ Engineering. Note any sand or Lock mandrel with pressure gauges hung
 WEG at 7410’ obstructions inside the tubing. off Feb 15 ‘17
 Perforations 7500’- 3. Make up lock mandrel with
7570’ MD. Note, top
WEG at 7410’
pressure gauges for XN Perforations 7500’-7570’ MD. Note, top
sand at 7500’, bottom
landing nipple at 7405’. sand at 7500’, bottom sand at 7610’.
sand at 7610’.
4. Run lock mandrel and set in
XN nipple, hang off gauges,
pull running tool.
5. RDMO SL

What is going to be 
done?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 9
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Sketches and Procedures – Workover


Pre Sketch 1. MIRU SL Proposed Sketch
2. Hold safety meeting. Make gauge ring run to PBTD
est. 7850’, send results to Engineering.
3. RDMO SL
4. If approval to proceed, MIRU completion rig
5. Install BPV, remove tree, NU BOPs
6. TIH with open ended workstring, displace hole with
9.8 ppg KCL completion fluid.
Note: expected reservoir pressure is 3600 psi at 7500’.
9.8 ppg fluid will provide a 222 psi OB.
7. Test casing to 5000 psi for 15 minutes
8. MIRU EL unit, hold explosives safety meeting and
conduct JSA. RIH and perforate 7500-7570’
(reference OH log dated Nov 9, 2016) with 4 5/8”
gun loaded 6 spf, 60 deg phasing,32 gm RDX
charges
9. POOH with guns, check that all shots have fired, if

T
not, inform Engineering
10. Monitor hole conditions for 4 hours, report any fluid
loss or pressure build up
11. If well stable, TIH with completion string consisting
of MS WL reentry guide, XN landing nipple, model

H
MJG mechanical retrievable packer, sliding side
door, and 2 7/8” 6.5 #/ft tubing. Set packer at 7400’.
12. MIRU SL, set plug in lower XN nipple, test tubing
to 5000 psi for 15 min. RDMO SL.
13. Test backside to 5000 psi for 15 min.

IG
14. Install BPV, ND BOPs, NU 5000 psi tree and
flowlines, pull BPV, turn well over to Production
15. If required, use lease gas to rock well in, open on
16/64 ck.
R
PY

Sketches and Procedures – Workover


Pre Sketch 1. MIRU SL Proposed Sketch
2. Hold safety meeting. Make gauge ring run to PBTD
 2 3/8” 4.7 ppf J-55 tubing
 2 7/8” 6.5 ppf API est. 7850’, send results to Engineering.
 SSD at 7390’
O

EUE N-80 tubing 3. RDMO SL


 Model XYZ packer set at 7150’
 SSD at 7390’ 4. If approval to proceed, MIRU completion rig
 XN at 7155’
 Model MJG packer 5. Install BPV, remove tree, NU BOPs
 WEG at 7160’
set at 7400’ 6. TIH with open ended workstring, displace hole with
 Perforations 7200 – 7230 MD.
 XN at 7405’ 9.8 ppg KCL completion fluid.
Note, top sand at 7200’, bottom
 WEG at 7410’ Note: expected reservoir pressure is 3600 psi at 7500’.
C

sand at 7230’.
 Perforations 7500’- 9.8 ppg fluid will provide a 222 psi OB.
 Cmt Retainer at 7400
7570’ MD. Note, top 7. Test casing to 5000 psi for 15 minutes
 Perfs squeezed with cement
sand at 7500’, bottom 8. MIRU EL unit, hold explosives safety meeting and
through cement retainer
sand at 7610’. conduct JSA. RIH and perforate 7500-7570’
 Perforations 7500’-7570’ MD.
(reference OH log dated Nov 9, 2016) with 4 5/8”
gun loaded 6 spf, 60 deg phasing,32 gm RDX
charges
9. POOH with guns, check that all shots have fired, if
not, inform Engineering
10. Monitor hole conditions for 4 hours, report any fluid
loss or pressure build up
11. If well stable, TIH with completion string consisting
of MS WL reentry guide, XN landing nipple, model
MJG mechanical retrievable packer, sliding side
door, and 2 7/8” 6.5 #/ft tubing. Set packer at 7400’.
12. MIRU SL, set plug in lower XN nipple, test tubing
to 5000 psi for 15 min. RDMO SL.
13. Test backside to 5000 psi for 15 min.
14. Install BPV, ND BOPs, NU 5000 psi tree and
flowlines, pull BPV, turn well over to Production
15. If required, use lease gas to rock well in, open on
16/64 ck.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 10
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Morning Reports

Final Post Well Sketch Morning Reports

T
 The work should go according to the
procedure
 There may be slight or major differences

H
 There may be significant deviations
 The engineer will use the morning reports
to develop a final post well sketch
IG
R
PY

Morning Reports
O

Morning Reports
A report that the operations team 
prepares daily, usually in the morning 
(6 AM is a typical report time).
C

These reports are industry standard. 
Globally, every company uses 
something similar. The format and 
content may vary slightly, but all 
contain similar information.

Reading these reports is important for 
most disciplines and managers involved in 
upstream activities.
What does your
company use
as a morning
report tool?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 11
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Morning Report Example


This is an example of a morning report. These morning reports are fairly
standard in that much of this similar information is conveyed in a daily
completion or work over morning report. Your company’s format might be
slightly different.

The Well Information section 
describes the well, where it is 
located, the casing 
configuration, and the report 
date. 

T
The Contact Information 

H
section tells us about the rig 
doing the work, and the 
primary contact – the company 
IG representative on site. 

The Cost Information section 
tells us about the costs – VERY 
R
IMPORTANT – what is the daily 
cost, the cumulative cost, and 
PY

the AFE cost (what was 
planned). 

The Daily Operations section 
tells us about the daily 
O

operations – VERY IMPORTANT 
– there is usually a summary, a 
C

forecast, and a 24‐hour detailed 
log. We might find information 
on fluids, pressures, and 
incidents here as well. 

The Perforations/Stimulation 
Summary section has details of 
perforation and stimulation – 
not all reports have this 
section, but it is common 
among the UR community. 
  

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 12
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Field Execution

Slick line Electric line


 Equipment used in
well completions and
workovers:
• Rigs
• Coiled Tubing Units
• Snubbing, or Hydraulic Coiled
Workover Units tubing units
Hydraulic
• Electric Line workover unit

T
• Slick line
• Stand alone pumping
operations (bull

H
Rigs
heading)

See Well Intervention Core.


IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 13
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Sketches and Procedures

Pre Sketch 1. MIRU SL


Proposed Sketch
2. Hold safety meeting. Make gauge ring run to PBTD est. 7850’, send results 2 7/8” 6.5
to Engineering. ppf API EUE
3. RDMO SL
4. If approval to proceed, MIRU completion rig
N-80 tubing
Well left
with 10 5. Make bit and scraper run to PBTD
SSD at 7390’
6. TIH with open ended workstring, displace hole with 9.8 ppg KCL
ppg mud completion fluid.
in casing Note: expected reservoir pressure is 3600 psi at 7500’. 9.8 ppg fluid will Model MJG
when provide a 222 psi OB. packer set at
drilling rig 7. Test casing to 5000 psi for 15 minutes 7400’
moved off 8. MIRU EL unit, hold explosives safety meeting and conduct JSA. RIH and
location. perforate 7500-7570’ (reference OH log dated Nov 9, 2016) with 4 5/8” gun XN at 7405’
loaded 6 spf, 60 deg phasing,32 gm RDX charges
9. POOH with guns, check that all shots have fired, if not, inform Engineering WEG at 7410’
10. Monitor hole conditions for 4 hours, report any fluid loss or pressure build
up

T
Perforations
11. If well stable, TIH with completion string consisting of MS WL reentry
7500’-7570’
guide, XN landing nipple, model MJG mechanical retrievable packer,
sliding side door, and 2 7/8” 6.5 #/ft tubing. Set packer at 7400’. MD. Note, top
12. MIRU SL, set plug in lower XN nipple, test tubing to 5000 psi for 15 min. sand at 7500’,

H
RDMO SL. bottom sand at
13. Test backside to 5000 psi for 15 min. 7610’.
14. Install BPV, ND BOPs, NU 5000 psi tree and flowlines, pull BPV, turn well
over to Production
15. If required, use lease gas to rock well in, open on 16/64 ck.
7” 32#/ft casing
run to 8000’ with
PBTD at 7850’
IG
R
PY

Sketches and Procedures

Pre Sketch 1. MIRU SL


Proposed Sketch
2. Hold safety meeting. Make gauge ring run to PBTD est. 7850’, send results 2 7/8” 6.5
O

to Engineering. ppf API EUE


3. This
RDMOisSLthe proposed sketch. This is what the
4. If approval to proceed, MIRU completion rig
N-80 tubing
Well left completion engineer wants to get to i.e., the
with 10 5. Make bit and scraper run to PBTD
SSD at 7390’
6. final state
TIH with openof theworkstring,
ended well. Theredisplaceishole
a lot
withof9.8 ppg KCL
ppg mud
engineering
completion fluid. that goes into this sketch; which is
C

in casing Note: expected reservoir pressure is 3600 psi at 7500’. 9.8 ppg fluid will Model MJG
when the overall subject of this module. Consider for
provide a 222 psi OB. packer set at
drilling rig 7. now several
Test casing to 5000questions:
psi for 15 minutes 7400’
moved off 8. MIRU Why perforate
EL unit, that safety
hold explosives interval?
meeting and conduct JSA. RIH and
XN at 7405’
location. perforate
Why 7500-7570’ (reference OH log dated Nov 9, 2016) with 4 5/8” gun
run that packer and that size tubing?
loaded 6 spf, 60 deg phasing,32 gm RDX charges
9. POOH Whywithrun
guns,tubing
check thatatallall?
shots have fired, if not, inform Engineering WEG at 7410’
10. Monitor
Whyhole just perforate,
conditions andreport
for 4 hours, notanyfrac
fluidorloss
gravel
or pressure build
up Perforations
pack?
11. If well stable, TIH with completion string consisting of MS WL reentry
7500’-7570’
guide, XN landing nipple, model MJG mechanical retrievable packer,
sliding side door, and 2 7/8” 6.5 #/ft tubing. Set packer at 7400’. MD. Note, top
12. MIRU SL, set plug in lower XN nipple, test tubing to 5000 psi for 15 min. sand at 7500’,
RDMO SL. bottom sand at
13. Test backside to 5000 psi for 15 min. 7610’.
14. Install BPV, ND BOPs, NU 5000 psi tree and flowlines, pull BPV, turn well
over to Production
15. If required, use lease gas to rock well in, open on 16/64 ck.
7” 32#/ft casing
run to 8000’ with
PBTD at 7850’

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 14
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Engineering Design Components

Completion Location Which zone? Multiple zones?

Primary Sand Face 
Do we need sand control or fracturing?
Completion Method

Perforating Almost always required – how?

What equipment is needed for safety and flexibility –
Upper Completion Selection
over the well’s life

Based on reservoir inflow over the life of the well, 

T
Tubing Selection
rate, pressure, fluid composition

Needs to hold reservoir pressure and not damage (be 
Completion Fluid

H
compatible with) the reservoir

Consider your barriers (usually two required) at each 
Barriers
stage of the operation

IG
R
PY

What Engineering Went into this Procedure?


O

Completion location
 Which zone or zones?
 Where are our target zones of interest?
 Is there just one zone of interest or are there 
C

more?
 How are we going to approach this completion
from the targets initially?

Typically, some combination of open hole well


logs and core data is used to help identify the
zones and determine the relevant properties.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 15
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

What Engineering Went into this Procedure?

Primary Sand face


Lower Completion
completion method

Just run casing and perforate (a satisfactory option if the 
1
reservoir is consolidated and has reasonable permeability)

If the reservoir is unconsolidated, you may need to install 
2
some form of sand control

If the reservoir has very low permeability, you may need to 

T
3
fracture the reservoir

 In most cases, we will need to select our perforation

H
strategy as part of this sand face completion – gun
type, shots per foot, etc.

IG
See the Sand Control Core and
Onshore Unconventional Well Completions Core
modules for more information.
R
PY

What Engineering Went into this Procedure?

Barriers
 General requirement to have two barriers in place 
O

for any operation
 A barrier is used in place for any uncontrolled loss
of produced fluids leading to the environment
 Barriers change throughout completion/workover 
C

operations – this is different from drilling 
operations where the two barriers (mud and the 
BOPs) are fairly constant

Tubing
Packer

Christmas tree
Tubing and Packer
Sub‐surface safety valve

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 16
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

What Engineering Went into this Procedure?

Upper completion selection


Includes:
 Selection of the flowing conduit (usually up
through tubing with a packer installed, but not 
Barrier always)
 Type of packer
 Selection of other equipment (in this example 
the wireline reentry guide, the XN landing 
nipple, and the sliding side door), and might
include others, including subsurface safety 
Barrier
valves.

T
 The selection of those components will  Selection of 
be based on a range of factors including  components
safety and long‐term flexibility

H
 Must select tubing size, grade, and
connections
 Requires analysis of Darcy’s Law
 Also look at pressures and the long‐term 

IG
drive mechanism to determine the 
optimum tubing
R
PY

What Engineering Went into this Procedure?

 Select the metals and elastomers
O

 Based on fluid components, pressure, 
and temperature
 Select the completion fluid
Barrier
C

 Always a clear brine, NOT drilling mud Selection of 
Multiple factors: completion fluid
 Completion fluid must have sufficient
hydrostatic head from the density to 
control the reservoir pressure at reservoir 
depth
 Completion fluid must be able to control
the reservoir pressure while in the 
completion phase 
 Completion fluid must also be compatible
with the formation, both the rock and the 
reservoir fluids.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 17
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

What Engineering Went into this Procedure?

 If your well is capable of flowing Select a tree based on


naturally at pressure, then a tree pressure, and any corrosive
will need to be selected. fluids you may have.

T
H
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 18
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Learning Objectives

This section has covered the following learning objectives:


 Explain the work product of a completions engineer
 Describe an initial completion procedure and sketch
 Translate chronological steps from a procedure to a well sketch
 Recognize and describe morning reports
 Recognize the engineering that is required for developing a
procedure

T
H
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 19
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Back to Work
Suggestions
Design Process for
Completions and
Workovers Core  Find and review a completion procedure that
Leverage the skills you’ve has been done in the field.
learned by discussing the
 Find the procedure, the pre-sketch, the
skill module objectives
with your supervisor to
proposed sketch, the final sketch and the
develop a personalized morning reports.
plan to implement on the
 Review these documents, and discuss your
job. Some suggestions

T
are provided.
review with a senior completions engineer.

H
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 20
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Design Process for


Completions and
Workovers Core

T
Basis of Design

H
IG
R
PY

Learning Objectives

This section will cover the following learning objectives:


O

 Explain and provide an example of Basis of Design (BOD)


 Compare and contrast design and BOD
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 21
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Cooking Analogy – Introduce the Basis of Design

Basil chicken recipe
Marinate chicken for 4 hours in a blend of balsamic 
Planned outcome vinegar, juice of 2 lemons including the lemon pieces, 
olive oil, fresh rosemary, garlic, salt, pepper
Prepare basmati rice with sliced mushrooms
Prepare sautéed broccoli, olives, red bell peppers, 
and green beans, add drizzle of soy sauce and splash 
of sherry

Prepare salad of lettuce, fresh tomatoes, feta cheese, 
and salad dressing of choice
Cook chicken in cast iron skillet, with lemon pieces, 

T
turning frequently until done, season with garlic, salt, 
List of  pepper
Process Recipe
ingredients
Place cast iron skillet with chicken in oven on warm 

H
with whole fresh basil leaves on top
Lightly wilt spinach in some of the juices from the 
You may want to cast iron skillet
pause
PAUSE a moment to review
IG Serve chicken on the wilted spinach, basil on top, 
with rice, vegetables, and salad
R
PY

Cooking Analogy – Introduce the Basis of Design


O

A lot of 
thinking 
before cooking
C

Cultural preference?

Taste preference?
Health?
Chicken on sale that day?
Taste?
Had pork the day before?
Equipment?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 22
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Basis of Cooking
Design 1 Design 2
I'm having some new work I wanted beef for dinner, but it was
colleagues over for dinner, but I'm expensive and chicken was on
not sure about their cultural sale. Plus, I had pork last night.
preferences. Chicken is usually
My basil in the garden is ready to
safe (but they could be
pick, so I will include chicken basil
vegetarian!).
and lemon.
No luck frying chicken in a pan
I don’t like fried chicken—well, I do
because the last few attempts
but I can’t take the calories, and

T
didn’t go so well. I don’t even have
how do I fry basil?
a fryer—don’t want to buy one

H
because then I’d fry too much and No recipe required. I’ve done this
fried food is not that healthy. plenty of times. I just know what to
do. Now, where is that bottle of
The chicken needs an internal
temperature of 250°F. I’ll check it
with a thermometer at the end. I
IG wine? For me, not the recipe…
R
will plan for 6 oz. of chicken per
person, with two spare portions.
PY

I heard this recipe was good—


looks similar to one I’ve done
before, but I like the heavy use of
basil and lemon. This is an
O

important dinner, so it needs be


right.
C

These above two scenarios would be considered the basis of design for
this meal—the “why” behind the “what”. The recipe is not the why, just the
what. And again, please note that we have two very different BODs that
lead to the same dinner plate.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 23
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Basis of Design

What is a Basis of Design (BOD)?

 The BOD is the “why” to the program’s


“what”
 BOD is all the things you (should)
consider when developing the
proposed sketch and the procedure/
equipment selection
 Many of these things you considered

T
have significant uncertainty at the
Completion stage since this occurs at
the beginning of the well life

H
 BOD is critical to document

IG
R
PY

Design vs. Basis of Design

Why (Basis of
O

What (Design)
Design)

1. Reservoir properties indicate


1. Run 3.5” tubing inflow is best handled by 3.5”
C

2. Run 13 chrome tubing 2. Reservoir fluid analysis


3. Perforate at 8000’–8200’ shows CO2
4. Use Service Company X 3. Interpreted Petrophysical logs
for all equipment indicate the best “pay”
5. Install sand monitoring on 8000–8300’, but the reservoir
flow line drive is expected to be
water influx
4. Procurement has a sole source
contract with “X”
5. Geologic work suggests potential
for unconsolidated sandstone

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 24
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Example BoD for our Example Well


Pre Sketch 1. MIRU SL Proposed Sketch
2. Hold safety meeting. Make gauge ring run to PBTD
est. 7850’, send results to Engineering
3. RDMO SL  2 7/8” 6.5 ppf
4. If approval to proceed, MIRU completion rig API EUE N-80 tubing
5. Make bit and scraper run to PBTD  SSD at 7390’
6. TIH with open ended workstring, displace hole with  Model MJG packer set
9.8 ppg KCL completion fluid at 7400’
Well left with * Note: expected reservoir pressure is 3600 psi at  XN at 7405’
10 ppg mud in 7500’. 9.8 ppg fluid will provide a 222 psi OB  Lock mandrel with pressure
casing when 7. Test casing to 5000 psi for 15 minutes gauges hung off Feb 15 ‘17
drilling rig 8. MIRU EL unit, hold explosives safety meeting and  WEG at 7410’
moved off conduct JSA. RIH and perforate 7500–7570’  Perforations 7500’–7570’
location (reference OH log dated Nov 9, 2016) with 4 5/8” gun MD. Note: top sand at
loaded 6 spf, 60 deg phasing,32 gm RDX charges 7500’, bottom sand at 7610’
9. POOH with guns, check that all shots have fired, if not,
inform Engineering

T
10. Monitor hole conditions for 4 hours, report any fluid
loss or pressure build up
11. If well stable, TIH with completion string consisting of
MS WL reentry guide, XN landing nipple, model MJG
mechanical retrievable packer, sliding side door, and 2

H
7/8” 6.5 #/ft tubing. Set packer at 7400’
 7” 32#/ft casing
12. MIRU SL, set plug in lower XN nipple, test tubing to
run to 8000’ with 5000 psi for 15 min. RDMO SL.
PBTD at 7850’ 13. Test backside to 5000 psi for 15 min.
14. Install BPV, ND BOPs, NU 5000 psi tree and flowlines,

IG
pull BPV, turn well over to Production
15. If required, use lease gas to rock well
in, open on 16/64 ck. You may want to PAUSE
pause a
to review the information.
moment
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 25
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Importance of BOD
 The Basis of Design is a critical document to facilitate long term
organizational learning. From the well sketch and procedure, it is
fairly easy to see WHAT was done, but it is very difficult to know why.

 The Basis of Design documents all the assumptions and data that
went into that design and provides the context for the design.

 Remember: You want to provide context around your decisions to


engineers that aren’t yet born—company standards will change,
regulations will change, technology will change.

T
H
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 26
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Back to Work
Suggestions
Design Process for
Completions and
Workovers Core
 Find and review a Basis of Design statement
Basis of Design used in your company for a recent
completion. 
Leverage the skills you’ve  Discuss your review with a senior completions
learned by discussing the engineer.
skill module objectives
 Note, not all companies have these titled

T
with your supervisor to
develop a personalized documents, if not, talk with a senior
plan to implement on the completions engineer about how the elements
job. Some suggestions

H
within a typical BoD are incorporated
are provided.
into your company’s work process.

IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 27
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

AFEs, AARs, CWOPS

Work Products   

Before we begin our mid-module review, let’s review the typical work
products that a completion or workover engineer would perform or do in
most operating companies. These would include AFEs (or Authority for
Expenditures), AARs (After Action Reviews) and perhaps CWOPs
(Complete the Well on Paper). AFE is almost always done as part of
normal work product. AAR and CWOP are not always done on every well.

T
H
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 28
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

AFE
 As part of the procedure, the completion engineer will almost always
prepare the expected cost. That cost, along with the expected
hydrocarbon rate from the well, oil or gas, will allow for the economic
justification for that work to proceed. As always, there are some
exceptions. Plug and abandonments need to be done for regulatory
requirements and, of course, any serious loss of barriers usually
requires a very quick workover. Even here, however, we’d like to
know the cost for planning purposes, even if there is no expected
profit from the work. For the majority of completion, workover or
intervention work, there is an economic justification to be done, and

T
that requires us to know the cost, or the cost for general planning
purposes.

H
 The cost estimate, prepared by the completion engineer, gets
formalized and approved by the appropriate level of management.
IG
That becomes then, the AFE, the authorization or authority for
expenditure.

 If it appears that the costs will go over what was expected, it may be
R
required to complete a supplementary AFE (and have it approved by
the appropriate level of management).
PY

 Engineers usually prepare this estimate based on rig day rate costs,
time estimates, and estimates for all the products and services
required.
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 29
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

AAR
It is generally a good idea to conduct formal after action reviews; usually on
wells where there is a significant difference between the plan and the
actual events. Or perhaps we would do this in the first five or ten wells of a
new development to capture learnings early on. When we see a large
difference between the plan and actual events, this could be for the better
or this could be for the worst. We might have had a so called train wreck on
the well and wish to delve deeply into the reasons behind that event. Or we
may have done a few things differently and saved significant time or cost
off the planned well. That’s also a very good situation to review and
document the reasons behind the positive outcome. Usually after action

T
reviews are done in an open meeting format with representatives from
Operations, Engineering, and other involved parties including service

H
companies present. They will review what happened after the action is
finished. This is documented and becomes part of the next well or wells
planning cycle.
IG
 Once a completion or workover is finished, it may have a formal “After
Action Review”.
R
 This review is typically done on wells where there was a large
difference between the plan and the actual events, or perhaps in the
PY

early stages of a development to capture learnings.

 The review is usually done in a meeting format, with representatives


from Operations, Engineering, and other involved parties all present
O

to Review what happened After the Action is finished.

 These AARs are documented and will become part of the next well’s
C

planning cycle.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 30
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

CWOP
 Another planning method occasionally engaged in the completion
world would be a CWOP; i.e. Complete the Well on Paper. Please
note there is also a DWOP which is a Drilled Well on Paper exercise
for the drilling portion of the well. This occurs before the well is
completed, ideally with enough lead times such that any changes or
ideas that come out of the CWOP can be implemented on location
during the actual completion.

 The idea is to get all involved parties together, Engineering,


Operations, the rig contractor, all the service providers, and carefully
go through the planned completion procedures step by step. The

T
assembled team is looking to leverage all the expertise in the room,
and ideally identify time savings, potential problems, develop

H
contingencies, etc.

IG
 There is also a degree of team building in these events. If done
properly, the same people that are in the meeting will be directly
involved in the completion activities.
R
 Not all wells will have the CWOP. These are saved for critical wells.
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 31
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Learning Objectives

This section has covered the following learning objective:


 Explain and provide and example of Basis of Design (BOD)
 Compare and contrast design and BOD

T
H
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 32
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Back to Work
Suggestions
Design Process for
Completions and
Workovers Core
 Find and review an AFE, AAR, and CWOP.
Basis of Design
 Discuss your review with a senior completions
engineer.
Leverage the skills you’ve
learned by discussing the
 Note, not all companies use all three of these
skill module objectives products. You should be able to find an AFE,
as these are very standard. If you do not find

T
with your supervisor to
develop a personalized an AAR or CWOP, discuss the reasons why
plan to implement on the your company does not use them in
job. Some suggestions

H
your work process – who knows,
are provided.
maybe there is an opportunity
for improvement!

IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 33
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Design Process for


Workover and Completions
Core

T
Linkage to Management Systems

H
IG
R
PY

Learning Objectives

This section will cover the following learning objective:

 Illustrate and explain the link between management systems


O

and the engineering design process


C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 34
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Linkage to Management Systems

This is usually represented as a wheel


and comes from the work of Deming.

Project Management

Business Management

T
Safety Management

H
Quality Management

IG
R
PY

Linkage to Management Systems

The AAR, morning reports, 
Basis of Design,
and the post sketch all feed 
O

Proposed Sketch, and 
PLAN into the next PLAN (a 
CWOP matches up 
revised Basis of Design and 
with the procedure
Proposed Sketch). 
C

Operations follows the 
DO  Many companies actively 
procedure
follow a Project Management
approach to well drilling and 
Daily morning reports  completions.
are reviewed by the   Several major service 
CHECK Operations and  companies have divisions 
Engineering team that offer fully integrated 
drilling and completion 
package divisions, “total” 
Immediate corrections  packages, and these typically 
may be made to the  are built around the project 
ACT well completion based  management methodology.
on new data

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 35
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Learning Objectives

This section has covered the following learning objective:


 Illustrate and explain the link between management systems and
the engineering design process

T
H
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 36
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Key Terms Review


Well Sketches These may be pre-sketches, proposed sketches, or the
actual final sketch.

Procedures The chronologically ordered steps to get from the pre-


sketch to the proposed sketch. We have seen that
there is a considerable amount of engineering design
that goes into the proposed sketch and the associated
procedure, the “what”.

Morning Reports The daily reports that the operations team prepares to

T
document their progress on location.

H
Basis of Design The background considerations that went into the
Statements proposed sketch and the procedure, the “why” behind
the “what”.

Authority for
Expenditure (AFE)
IG
The estimated cost of a proposed completion of
workover program. This is built from an estimate of the
R
time, daily cost (rig), plus all the equipment and
services.
PY

After Action Report A team-based report that discusses what happened


(AAR) during a completion or workover operation, usually with
the intent to learn from the event and minimize
O

problems and maximize best practices in the next


well(s).
C

Complete the Well A team-based activity that attempts to leverage all the
on Paper (CWOP) expertise available to improve the procedure or
operations BEFORE commencement on site.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 37
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Design Process for


Completions and
Workovers Core

T
Completion Design

H
IG
R
PY

Learning Objectives

This section will cover the following learning objective:

 Identify the objectives of a completion


O

 Identify and describe each aspect that is to be considered to


achieve the two objectives
C

 Compare the different drive mechanisms

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 38
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Purpose of Completion Design


A completion is designed to do two things:

1. Economically optimize production over time


2. Control pressure/fluid path, reservoir to downstream choke

T
H
IG  
R
 Allows for controlled flow from the reservoir to surface and to the primary
process facilities
PY

 Facilitates controlled re-entry according to site specifics


 Allows for artificial lift, if needed
 Allows for monitoring/diagnostic work
 Allows for “optimal” inflow from the primary target reservoir
 Designed for rock properties (permeability, consolidation)
O

 Designed for expected fluids and pressures over the life of the well,
considering the reservoir and geology
C

 Allows for future changes to the primary reservoir (pressure depletion,


increase in secondary phase)
 Includes provision for accessing secondary, tertiary, etc., targets
 Designed to handle all stress cases over the life of the well
 Incorporates input from procurement, finance, logistics, HR, service
companies, R&D
 Adheres to all internal and external regulations and specifications
 If injection is planned, designed to facilitate this change in the future

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 39
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Completion Objectives
Objective 1 – Maximize NPV 

T
H
IG
R
PY

The primary objective is to generate an economic return for the Company,


so that the Company can continue to exist, and invest in new opportunities.
Companies may define “economic return” differently, but one very common
measure would be the Net Present Value of a project.
O

Looking at the chart, on the bottom axis is time, there is always some
elapsed time between a project identification and first production – this
C

could be anything from time waiting on a rig to time to analyze seismic data
and acquire the lease. This time is usually measured in months to years.

After this upfront time has elapsed, we then usually have a period of
substantial investment, shown on the graph as negative money, or money
we are spending from our accounts. Again, this could be a single well, or it
could be a platform, and multiple wells. Either way, one aspect of the
petroleum industry is (typically) a large upfront investment is required
before we receive back any money in income from the production. We must
drill the well before we can put it on production!

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 40
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Looking at the graph and recognizing that our objective is to maximize the
net present value of the project over the life of the project, we can see there
are only four things we can do to impact the cumulative net present value.

1. We can do the project faster. Remember, we are interested in


maximizing the net present value, so anything we can do to get the
project online fast should result in a greater NPV. This is related to
inflation and is often termed “the time value of money”.
2. We can do the project for less cost. Lower cost and the same
revenue will clearly yield more net present value.
3. We can achieve a higher production rate; or in the case of our
unconventional wells, a higher initial production (IP). The more we

T
make, the more we can sell and the more revenue. We also benefit
from the timing effects if we get the higher production and higher

H
revenue earlier in the life of the field, again due to the time value of
money.
IG
4. And, we can produce for a longer period – extending production out
and therefore recovering more reserves and generating more
revenue.
R
These four levers to NPV do not always work in exactly the same direction.
We may pay more for a larger frac job to substantially increase our initial
PY

production rate. We may choke back initial production rates to be able to


use an existing facility. The engineering team will usually consider many
economic scenarios to find the right balance between these four items that
results in the maximum NPV for the project.
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 41
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Examples
Let’s now directly relate this to a well completion with a few examples.

What can we do to speed up the time to a completion?


Good logistics can help here especially in remote areas – having the
anticipated equipment in country or at a nearby base can drastically
shorten the time to complete the well in certain locations. Good
procurement practices to arrange favorable frac dates can help in the
unconventional world.

What can we do to lower the cost of a completion?

T
We can obviously get the best price for our equipment and services, and

H
we can also use the most appropriate equipment. Very often the rig cost
is a significant portion of the overall cost, so anything we can do to
shorten the time to complete the well will help.
IG
What can we do to increase the production rate?
R
This question links directly to our inflow and outflow equations, and
optimizing both. Minimizing completion damage will increase production
and ensuring that we have the right sized tubing can also maximize rate.
PY

What can we do to extend the productive life of the well?


Artificial lift would fit this category, as would any of our efforts to set up
O

more than one zone in the initial completion, with dual completions, or
selective completions.
C

Please keep this in mind as you go through this course. The first objective
will be to maximize the net present value of the project, or well completion
or workover. For every tool or process we discuss, think about how it
relates to this graph. If something does not seem to relate to any part of
this graph, then it should directly relate to our second objective.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 42
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Objective 2 – Safety
HSE includes worker safety
on location (injury), worker
health (MSDS sheets/food
preparation), environmental
impacts (waste handling),
and control of pressurized
hydrocarbon fluids.

T
H
IG
 The second main objective is safety. Now safety, or the requirement
for safety, is present throughout the oil field. Included is worker safety,
injuries, worker health, MSDS sheets, materials safety data sheets,
R
and even food preparation is important. Many rig sites around the
world have their own catering and food preparation directly impacts
PY

worker health.

 Also consider environmental impacts. This could be normal waste


handling of waste generated on location, such as, used drilling mud,
leftover cement, regular trash from the catering operations. But very
O

significantly, we are concerned with the control of pressurized


hydrocarbon fluids. When control of these fluids is lost, this is often
C

termed a blowout and this tends to have significant negative press.


Loss of control of energized hydrocarbons can then lead to loss of life
and significant environmental impact.

 These are the two primary considerations we will have on any of our
design decisions. Maximize our net present value and minimize,
reduce and eliminate any safety issue incidents. Profit and safety
underpin most of the design choices.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 43
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Achieving the Objectives


To achieve the two objectives, below are aspects one must consider: The
geologic setting: Depth, pressure, temperature, permeability, consolidation,
grain size, clays, etc.

 Reservoir engineering: Including inflow equations, drive


mechanism, reserves/expected life, fluid types and composition.

 Petrophysics: You need the logs to show us fluid contacts, reservoir


layering, and the number of zones.

 Current well conditions: Cement quality in areas of interest, casing

T
integrity, casing size, well deviation, equipment or “fish” currently in
the well.

H
 Facilities: Including capacity for all fluids, including any sales
limitations.

 Regulations: Internal and external


IG
R
 Logistics/Location access: Where are you in the world and does
this somehow impact decisions? Can the location be accessed year-
round with any equipment you may desire?
PY

 Procurement: Do you have preferred vendors for certain products or


services?
O

There are MANY items that should be considered in a completion design,


some relatively global, many local. Good completion design considers as
much as possible including, but not limited to, these items discussed here.
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 44
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Geologic Setting

Permeability

Permeability is king, even in


unconventionals. You must
understand permeability to
understand the potential inflow,
tubing sizes, as well as the
need for fracturing if the
permeability is too low.

T
Clay content

H
Needed for selecting
compatible completion fluids and stimulation fluids.

Grain sizes
IG
R
If gravel packing is required, you must know the formation grain sizes to
design the pack.
PY

Depth, Pressure, Temperature

This will be used in determining tubing strength requirements and


completion fluid density. The deeper the well, the more the tubing will
O

weigh, and the more load on the top tubing joint. More pressure usually
means more rate, and potentially larger tubing. More pressure means more
C

likelihood of burst, so again, tubing design. Temperature will impact


elastomer selection.

Consolidation

Right after permeability, you need to know something about the


consolidation of the rock. Younger rocks may be unconsolidated, and
grains of sand may be produced with the hydrocarbon. This can cause
erosion, and the completion may require sand control.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 45
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Oil Inflow Equations


Below is an oil inflow equation, assuming drainage is a circle. There are
other equations for Gas and for different flow geometries (horizontal wells).

T
H
IG
R
PY

Where:
= Rate

= Rate of oil
O

= Permeability to oil in milidarcies

  = Height of the reservoir in feet


C

  = Viscosity

  = Formation volume factor


̅   = Average reservoir pressure

  = Flowing bottomhole pressure


  = Drainage radius

  = Wellbore radius

  = Skin factor

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 46
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Drive Mechanism Impact


You must also be aware of reservoir drive mechanisms while designing a
completion. Again, the completion is not something that is installed for the
well's capability to produce on day one. The completion should be there to
maximize the net present value over the life of the well. You must
understand with the help of your reservoir engineering colleagues what the
drive mechanism will do over time and how that may affect the completion
design. All reservoirs have some drive energy which will enable
hydrocarbon to be produced into the wellbore from the reservoir.

Several items need to be considered when reviewing the reservoir

T
drive mechanism:

H
 What will happen to pressure over time?

 What will happen to the ratio of gas/oil/water over time? (For an oil
IG
well, consider the gas/oil ratio and the water/oil ratio.)

 If the natural pressure will decline, are there plans to inject something
R
(usually water, could be gas) to maintain pressure?
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 47
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Drive Mechanisms

 Generally, three main types of drive mechanisms are


considered active in the Petroleum Industry.

For Oil Reservoirs


• There may be a combination of
 Solution Gas Drive more than one type, and they
may have different
 Gas Cap Drive contributions to the overall drive
 Water Drive of the reservoir – weak vs.
strong water drive, for example

T
For Gas Reservoirs

H
 Depletion or Gas Expansion
 Water Drive

IG
R
PY

Solution Gas Drive


O

 Solution gas drive


C

• The gas dissolved in oil


comes out of oil and
expands pushing the oil out
of the reservoir

Oil Zone

Liberated Gas

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 48
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Solution Gas Drive Performance

RESERVOIR
Pi PRESSURE

DAILY OIL PRODUCTION RATE


PRODUCING GAS-OIL RATIO
RESERVOIR PRESSURE

PRODUCING
Pb GAS-OIL RATIO

T
H
Rsi
DAILY OIL
PRODUCTION RATE

TIME

IG
Idealized typical solution gas drive performance behavior.
R
PY

Gas Cap Drive Reservoir


O

 Gas cap drive


C

• The free gas in the


reservoir expands and
pushes the
hydrocarbons out

Original GOC

Liberated Gas

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 49
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Gas Cap Drive Performance

RESERVOIR
Pi PRESSURE

PRODUCING
DAILY OIL PRODUCTION RATE GAS-OIL RATIO
PRODUCING GAS-OIL RATIO
RESERVOIR PRESSURE

Pb

T
Rsi

H
DAILY OIL
PRODUCTION RATE

TIME

IG
Idealized, typical gas cap drive performance behavior.
R
PY

Water Drive Reservoir


O

 Water (aquifer) drive


C

• The underlying aquifer


pushes the
hydrocarbons to the
surface

Oil Zone

Water-Invaded Zone
Original WOC
Water

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 50
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Strong Water Drive Performance

RESERVOIR
Pi PRESSURE

PRODUCING
DAILY WATER PRODUCTION RATE GAS-OIL RATIO
Rsi
DAILY OIL PRODUCTION RATE
PRODUCING GAS-OIL RATIO

DAILY OIL
Pb
RESERVOIR PRESSURE

PRODUCTION RATE

T
DAILY WATER

H
PRODUCTION RATE

Idealized, typical strong water drive performance behavior.


IGTIME
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 51
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Fluid Composition and Reserves

Fluid Composition 
In addition to understanding the reservoir drive mechanism, you will have to
learn about the fluid composition. This is a large area of study for reservoir
engineers. As completion engineers, we need to know if we will be
producing oil or gas.

► Gas finds possible leak paths much easier than oil, therefore, there is
a bigger concern with gas tight tubing connections, etc.

You need to know if there are any non-hydrocarbon components in the

T
fluids.

H
► Specifically, there is an interest in components that cause corrosion,
or enhanced HSE risks; CO2 and H2S, predominately. These two
IG
gases when combined with other fluids will have a corrosive effect on
your metals in the well, and you must select the metals to be able to
resist the corrosion from either CO2 or H2S. This is discussed further
in Completion Design Fundamentals module.
R
Reserves 
PY

If tasked with optimizing the NPV of the well over the life of the well, you
will need to know the lifespan. This is directly related to the size of the
reservoir, the location of well in relation to any fluid contacts, and the drive
mechanism. Be aware of any other zones encountered in the well.
O

► Will this well produce one zone for 5 years?


► One zone for 25 years?
C

► Or will it produce 3 different zones (approximately 7 years per zone)


over a total of 21 years?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 52
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

The Petrophysical Scene

Formation
Evaluation
While
Reservoir
Drilling Wireline
Monitoring

Open hole logs:


 Resistivity Cased hole logs:
 Nuclear  Nuclear
Mudlog Core
 Acoustic  Production logs
data data
 Other

T
 Other

Corrections:

H
- invasion
- layering
- deviation

IG Interpretation models
incl. QC and Uncertainty
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 53
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Factors of Completion
GAMMA RAY  Measures natural radiation – Gamma Rays
(API Units)  Identifies lithology (defines sand/shale boundaries)
 Works in open hole and in cased wells; this is one of the few
logs that can work through steel casing to identify formation
characteristics
Gamma ray helps us identify the sand packages (with porosity and
ideally some perm) from shale (think conventional shale, so
virtually no perm)

RESISTIVITY  Laterolog/Induction Log (Conductivity) Measures resistance


(Ohm – to induced current, formation water contains salt, salty water
does not resist the flow of electrical current, so low resistivity
Meters)

T
indicates water.
 Hydrocarbon contains low amounts of salt, so oil does resist
the flow of electrical current, so higher resistivity generally

H
indicates the presence of hydrocarbon.
Resistivity helps us determine if the sand contains water (salty

DENSITY 
IG
water) or hydrocarbon – note the sand might contain both, and
then we would have an identified hydrocarbon/water contact.
Measures back – scatter of imposed radiation – Gamma rays
Detects Lithology and ⌀
R
(DENSITY in 
Grams/cc) The Density and Neutron logs combined help us differentiate gas
from oil. Again, we might have both and, therefore, a gas/oil
PY

Compensated contact.
Formation Density
Log

NEUTRON  Tool measures amount of hydrogen in formation; porosity


derived
O

LOG
 The density and neutron tools combined can differentiate gas
Emit NEUTRONS; from oil in a hydrocarbon interval
detect Neutrons
C

ACOUSTIC or  Measures transit time of transmitted sound


SONIC  Measures ⌀
(Microseconds)  Used to also calculate certain rock properties useful for
fracture design.

The Density, Neutron, and Sonic logs can also give provide a measure of the
porosity, this is needed for determining reserves.
 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 54
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Effective Reservoir
Look at a few simple logs to calibrate your understanding and enable you
to digest how this information is used in completion design. By convention,
it is assumed that anything more than 50% sand in a conventional reservoir
would be considered part of your reservoir pay section. In the log below,
the 100% shale line is drawn on the right. On the left is the 100% sand or a
0% shale line, and we interpolate between the two of them, draw a 50%
shale line. Anything cleaner than the 50% shale line would be sand and
you would use in the calculations for reservoir thickness. You can see in
the adjacent image it is marked off in yellow.

T
H
IG
R
PY
O
C

Given the four most common logs, below is a brief example of an


analysis.
 On the left track is the gamma ray log, which shows the sand from
shale. As a reminder, the gamma ray responds to natural background
radiation in the sand or the shales. Shales have a much higher
natural background radiation than sands do. In this log, the scale at
the top goes from zero gamma ray units to 200 on the right. Moving
from the left to the right gets you more shale. The 50% or greater
sand line in the yellow is indicated.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 55
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

 On the resistivity track, there is hydrocarbon in the top red section,


and salty water in the lower deep purple section. We mark off an oil-
water contact slightly above 1,820.

 On the density and neutron logs example in the middle, the crossover
of those two logs is identified on the top. This is an indication of the
gas zone, and a gas-oil contact can be marked at approximately
1,810. This one sand package on the left has within it all three fluid
phases. There is an oil-water contact, therefore you have gas at the
top, oil in the middle and water down below. This would drive the
completion strategy as we would generally wish to preserve the
reservoir energy of the gas and the water and produce only the oil

T
initially. We would place or target our perforations to just produce the
oil from the middle of this sand package.

H
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 56
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Current Well Conditions


You must have a good understanding of the current well conditions to
create the Pre-Sketch.
The following are of importance:
 The condition of the cement in your area of interest.

 Casing integrity:
o Is the casing new and successfully pressure tested?
o Is the well old (and undergoing a workover) where there is
concern about corrosion?

T
o Are there perforations to consider?

H
 Casing size/pressure rating:
o If a new well, you should have the right sized/rated casing for
IG
the intended completion but not always. In workovers that occur
years after the initial completion, the casing will need to be
assessed.
R
 Wellbore deviation may have an impact in your completion and needs
to be at least considered. Some tools might not go through areas of
PY

rapidly changing deviation or out into long segments of high


deviation.

 What is in the well currently?


O

o If a workover then there will be equipment from the original


completion (or prior workovers) that may need to be removed.
o If a new well, what type of fluid is in the well? Is this good
C

enough for our completion, or will we need to change it out?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 57
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Facilities
Facilities, in their most basic form, take
the production from a well, separate the
oil, water, and gas and route these three
streams appropriately (further treating,
sales, disposal, injection).
The equipment used for this separation
and routing is on the surface and is sized
for a given throughput. There may be
limitations in any one piece of equipment,

T
including disposal constraints or possibly
even sales (transportation) constraints.

H
In some parts of the United States, the
recent unconventional shale oil boom
placed a significant stress on local IG
infrastructure, and although there were wells that could produce oil, there
were no pipelines in place and getting the oil to market was a significant
R
logistical challenge.
PY

In addition, the gas was often flared in those areas, there was no local
market for gas. Gas is much harder to transport than oil and there was no
market, no ability to get the gas to market, so the gas was flared on
location.
O

 In a brand-new development, the facilities are designed to match the


expected output of the planned wells.
C

 Over time there may be more targets, or you may identify ways to
produce more hydrocarbon.
 Occasionally, there will be facilities restrictions on one or more
phases. Perhaps the reservoir water drive was stronger than planned
and water is being produced more than expected, or maybe, there is
more gas to handle.
 Check with the Facilities team to assess if there are any constraints
and remember most constraints are just a matter of money to
overcome. Keep in mind, the objective is to maximize NPV not to
minimize facilities expenses.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 58
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Logistics
Internationally, logistics may be a serious consideration for design
purposes. If you have started a project internationally, there may be a very
long lead time to get certain equipment into the country.
► Explosives for perforating, for instance, often must go through a
lengthy importation process. Sometimes, the best piece of equipment
to use is one that is already in the country.

In addition to general country set location and logistics, we have to


consider access to the location itself, even if the location is logistically close
to a main oil field service center.

T
► We can consider a small platform in the Gulf of Mexico being very

H
close to the entire Gulf of Mexico oil infrastructure but if the platform
is small enough, we may not be able to get equipment that we would
like to onto that platform.
IG
The same applies to remote jungle locations and perhaps even locations in
rocky areas of the mountains where it is expensive to clear that mountain
R
into a pad, and therefore, smaller pads are prevalent.
We may also have a weather window for doing work. This may be during
PY

the summer, this may be during the winter. It all depends on the location.
 Access to location: Is this location easily accessed year-round with
virtually any size/weight equipment?
O

 Do we have a size/weight limitation as on some small offshore


platforms or remote jungle (helicopter access) locations?
C

 Do we have a weather window for doing work?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 59
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Procurement
Good procurement serves a real purpose in maximizing NPV over the life
of the well. Good procurement is not just about lower direct cost but also
the correct introduction of technology, lower total cost, and long-term
support.
However, we must recognize that procurement is often a factor in well
design. Perhaps through first call or sole source contracts, or through other
involvement.

T
H
IG
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 60
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Regulations
Regulations come in many forms, but we may broadly categorize these as
internal and external.

External regulations are usually from the local governing body, for
example, the state regulatory agency, OSHA, perhaps BSEE, or
internationally the local government agency.
► You should always know the local regulatory agency and be familiar
with how your company intends to remain current and comply with
regulations.

T
Internal regulations are from the Company. These often complement the
external regulations or translate external expectations into clear

H
requirements.
► Casing must be adequately pressure tested to test casing to 80% of
IG
the burst rating for 15 minutes and record on calibrated chart
recorder.
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 61
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Other Factors
In some places, this has a significant impact on
operations and timing and perhaps the design itself.
There are some parts of the world where one cannot
work a part of the year during weather periods. In other
WEATHER
parts of the world, one may be able to work during
inclement weather periods. Perhaps we should plan
more time and therefore, more money in our cost
estimates.
When we talk about surface controlled sub surface
safety valves, we will consider the risk assessment to

T
SECURITY
determine if they are needed. Part of this risk
assessment should consider local security concerns.

H
Technical operating staff should always know the fiscal

FISCAL
REGIME
IG
regime under which they are operating. In some parts
of the world, contracts significantly favor CAPEX over
OPEX, and this can have an impact on design. It
comes back to maximizing the perceived value of the
R
asset.
 
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 62
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

An Important Note on Unconventional Well Design


It was stated that conventional well completions are individually designed,
one at a time, starting from the log. The discussion so far in this module
follows a conventional completion process fairly well. We need to consider
the log, geology, fluid contacts; i.e. everything in each well's design.

Recently, unconventional completions are not typically individually


designed from the log up. They are geometrically designed. By that we
mean we will have perforation clusters 30 feet apart, with stages every
150 feet. We're going to do this from the toe of the well to the heel of the
well with no real regard for the logs.

T
Every well in the area will have the same simulation design. We will frack
each well the same, and after we do a certain number of wells; or a certain

H
period of time passes, we may do a review and we might adjust our overall
design for the next batch of wells. However, recently most unconventional
IG
wells are not individually designed from the logs up with individual frack
programs designed for each stage based on that well's rock properties at
that depth. This is a slight difference between unconventional and
R
conventional wells in 2017.
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 63
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Module Review
Now we’ll go through a series of steps to summarize what has been
covered so far in this module. Consider geologic/reservoir parameters, rock
characteristics, fluid characteristics, well conditions and everything else into
the basis of design. This basis of design will then lead to your design, the
completion program, the completion sketch, the proposed sketch, and the
AFE.
You may complete a CWOP event to refine this design if you have sufficient
justification for the time and cost. Usually these are done on expensive,
critical wells.
Then, proceed to the location and work will get done on site through the

T
operations team. They will report their progress through daily morning
reports; which the engineering team will use to monitor and support the

H
operation, and to generate the post or final sketch. You can choose to do
an After Action Review to gather all of the learnings from this particular
IG
completion and feed those back into the “everything else” category that
goes into the basis of design for the next well. This category of “everything
else” and many of the concepts presented here will be reviewed next.
R
PY
O
C

These steps will be covered in more detail on the next pages.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 64
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Basis of Design Review

Geological Reservoir Parameters 
For the geologic and reservoir parameters, there is a concern with the
geologic characteristics of this reservoirs size, shape and thickness. These
will all lead to a reserve estimate which can be used to estimate the time
this well will be on production, and how much fluid this well is expected to
produce or handle over its life. There is also a concern with the depth, the
temperature, the pressures, and other geologic items such as the trap type.
For continuity, some questions you may need to answer include, are there
variations of permeability across the field that might drive us to require

T
more wells with smaller tubing? Or is this an extremely well-connected field
where a few wells with large tubing would be sufficient?

H
You must have a good understanding of your production profile over time.
IG
Generally, you will need to work with the reservoir engineering team and
others to develop this profile. This will include the inflow equation, how fluid
is brought from the reservoir into the well, and the outflow equation. This
R
will be discussed further in the Completion Design Fundamentals
module. Again, we are not looking at this on day one of the well's life, but
PY

ideally, some idea of the production profile over the life of the well,
including changing fluid ratios. We must understand the reservoir drive
mechanism and how this will affect the production profile over time.
O

Geologic
Characteristics Continuity Productivity
Size Perm barriers Inflow equation
C

Shape Perm variations Outflow equation


Thickness-Reserves Continuity Profile over time
Depth
Temp
Pressure
Trap type

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 65
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Rock Characteristics 
You need to have an understanding of the reservoir rock. Some questions
to ask are, Is this a sandstone or a carbonate? Where are the shale
barriers? How is the shale and sedimentary rock distributed, is it In layers
or In packages? Are there any scale forming contaminants, perhaps,
present in the rock? What type of clay do you have? What do they react
with? Is the rock well-cemented or loosely cemented? Unconsolidated with
a chance of sand production?

What is the porosity of the rock? The permeability? If this rock can or will
produce sand, you may need to consider sand control. Are there moveable

T
fines? Perhaps not the main rock grains themselves, but smaller fines may
move without moving the larger grains.

H
If you are going to install a gravel pack, you must understand the grain size
IG
distribution. Is the planned completion or simulation fluid compatible with
the rock? If discussing a fracture treatment, you will need to know min and
max stresses, their directions, Young's modulus, and perhaps other rock
R
properties.
PY

Lithological / Chemical Description

 Sedimentary  Porosity
o Sandstone  Permeability
o Carbonate  Relative Perm
O

 Shale Barriers  Consolidation


 Shale/Sedimentary  Moveable fines
C

 Distribution  Grain size distribution


 Contaminants  Wettability
o Scale forming  Compatibility with
 Clay content planned completion /
stimulation fluids
o Clay types
o Reactivity  Min/max stresses and
directions
 Cementation
 Young’s modulus

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 66
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Fluid Characteristics 
Some questions to answer in order to better understand the fluid present
are, do you have oil, gas or water? What is the density, or perhaps gravity?
What is the viscosity? What is the formation volume factor? Do you have
any bubble or dew points? What are the saturations of these fluids in the
zones of interest? Are there any contacts that we wish to stay away from in
our perforating design?

On the chemical properties of the fluids, what's the total composition? We


can use this to perhaps estimate a tendency to form wax in the wellbore.
We are certainly concerned with corrosive agents such as H2S and CO2.

T
Are the fluids in the reservoir rock compatible with their planned completion
or stimulation fluids?

H
Physical Properties Chemical Properties

 Oil, Gas, Water


o Density/Gravity
IG  Total composition
 Wax content
o Viscosity
R
 Asphaltenes
o B (formation volume
factor)  Corrosive agents
PY

o Pb (bubble point, dew o H2S


point) o CO2
 Saturations  Compatibility with planned
 Contact levels completion/stimulation fluids
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 67
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Well Conditions 
The current well conditions should be taken into consideration. If this is the
initial completion, the current well conditions should be straight-forward.
However, if this is a workover, you may be looking at a well that has been
in existence for 40 years. You must understand the casing integrity, the
cement in the new zone of interest and the cement quality. Is the ideal
casing size available to you? Or is there a need to scale down the
completion to fit into an existing wellbore? What are the pressure ratings of
the casing? Are there any existing perforations?

Directional surveys will need to be reviewed for high angle sections, and

T
this then considered as part of the overall design. If there is equipment in
the well, find out what type of equipment, and how old it is. Take into

H
consideration a piece of equipment that has been in the well for 50 years
and if it has to be pulled out because it may cause some operational
IG
constraints. Do you cut tubing and leave the rest in the well? Are there any
identified fish in the well? And what fluids are currently in the well?
R
Casing/Cement Deviation Well Status

 Cement quality  Directional survey  Type of equipment


PY

 Casing integrity  Doglegs  Age of equipment


 Casing size  High angle  Condition of
 Casing pressure sections equipment
O

ratings  Remove or leave


 Perforations  Fish
C

 Fluid

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 68
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Everything Else 
Finally, there is a catch all category that is broken down roughly into 4 sub
areas. The first are technical factors – consider facilities, capacity, export
capacity, workover, or re-entry considerations. Can you get on this well
easily? Is there anything you wish to monitor? Procurement would fall into
this category. Added here is all of the offset data from other wells and any
previously done after action reviews. That would all feed into the basis of
design.

On regulatory considerations, we must contemplate current HSE Health


Safety Environment Standards. How will you dispose of any produced

T
water? How will you handle any gas? Do you flare it, or do you sell all the
produced gas? Will you commingle zones? You will see this more in a

H
future module, along with a discussion about the commingling requirements
generally in place around the world. Who is the local regulatory agency and
IG
how do you contact them? How do you get the right permits for the work
that will be done? What are the internal regulations? Is there a certain
manual we're supposed to follow, or do we have internal regulations
R
scattered throughout the organization?
PY

Let's consider our local political and economic system, particularly if


working internationally. Consider the contract type, taxation, production
sharing, royalties, and work commitments? Occasionally, oil companies will
have a commitment to drill a certain number of wells in a certain timeframe.
O

This commitment has to be balanced out with logistics, rig availability, sand
so forth.
C

There may be employment requirements for local national staff, or you may
have incentives to do certain things faster. Are there any security issues?
Where are the local hydrocarbon markets? Also consider items related to
the environment or the location such as weather and infrastructure. Will this
development cause significant local impact that has to be managed? Is
there access to the site year-round or only during certain weather seasons?
How big is the location and are there other considerations to take? Lastly,
how will we manage the logistics?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 69
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Technical Factors Regulatory Considerations

 Facilities capacity / Export  HSE standards


capacity
 Disposal of H2O
 Workover / Re-entry  Gas handling-flaring
considerations
 Commingling
 Monitoring
 Regulatory agency
 Procurement
Offset data into BoDAARs into BoD
 Internal regulations

T
Political / Economic System Environmental / Location

H
 Contract Type  Weather
 Taxation  Infrastructure
 Production sharing
 Royalties
IG  Local impact
 Access
 Commitments o Weather
R
 Employment o Location size
o Location other
 Incentives
PY

 Event risk
 Markets
 Logistics
 Security
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 70
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Completion/ Workover Design

Program Design
Equipment Design and Selection
and Selection

Sandface Completion Ancillary Equip. Essential Equip.


• Sand Control
• Frac Tubing/ connection
• Acid 1. Flexibility Wellhead/ tree
Perforating Method Subsurface safety
Wireline nipples
Completion Fluid systems
Circulating devices
Packer
Chemical injection

T
mandrels
Artificial lift

H
2. Durability

Flow couplings

See Design Fundamentals


for more information the design phase.
IG
Tubing seals
Blast joints
Sand Control Equip
R
PY
O
C

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 71
Design Process for Completion and Workovers Core
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Learning Objectives

This section has covered the following learning objectives:


 Identify the objectives of a completion
 Identify and describe each aspect that is to be considered to
achieve the two objectives
 Compare the different drive mechanisms

T
H
IG
R
PY

PetroAcademyTM Completions and Workovers

 Onshore Conventional Well Completion Core


O

 Design Process for Completions and Workovers Core


 Perforating Core
C

 Onshore Unconventional Well Completion Core


 Sand Control Core
 Hydraulic Fracturing
 Design Fundamentals
 Well Completion Fundamentals
 Formation Damage and Matrix Stimulation Core
 Flow Assurance and Production Chemistry Core
 Production Problem Diagnosis Core
 Well Intervention Core
 Workover Fundamentals

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
© PetroSkills, LLC. All rights reserved. 72

You might also like