Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Received February 11, 2002; accepted after revision August 27, 2002.
1
Department of Radiology, Yamanashi Medical University, 1110 Shimokato, Tamaho, Nakakoma-gun, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan. Address correspondence to Tsutomu Araki.
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Kofu Kyoritsu Hospital, 1-9-1 Takara, Kofu-city, Yamanashi, 400-0034, Japan.
AJR 2003;180:716–718 0361–803X/03/1803–716 © American Roentgen Ray Society
A B
American Journal of Roentgenology 2003.180:716-718.
C D E
Before the occlusion balloon was completely Discussion venosus in fetal circulation. According to
deflated, the shunt venous pressure measured The ductus venosus is a fetal circulation Mitchell et al. [1], the ductus venosus is rap-
through the balloon catheter was decreased by system that provides a direct connection be- idly obliterated after birth and forms the liga-
approximately 0–3 mm Hg, and no coil migra- tween the portal vein and inferior vena cava or ment venosum. Unlike the umbilical vein,
tion or movement was seen during slight defla- left hepatic vein. A patent ductus venosus the ductus venosus rarely reopens in patients
tion of the balloon. The temporary occlusion should differ from intrahepatic portosystemic with portal hypertension because the ductal–
balloon had been inflated for 3 hr by the time venous shunts without liver cirrhosis, which portal junction closes early, whereas the um-
the embolization was completed. An arterial may be congenital in origin [7]. In the embryo, bilical–portal junction is frequently patent
portogram obtained after embolization showed when remnants of anastomosis between the after birth. Our patient had a portal venous
that the shunt was completely occluded, and the subcardinal venous and vitelline venous sys- pressure of 18 mm Hg, but portal hyperten-
right portal branches were wider than before tems are present, intrahepatic portosystemic sion did not seem to have caused the ductus
embolization. Ten days after embolization, the venous shunts occur, usually between intrahe- venosus to reopen because other collateral
blood ammonia level had dropped from 193 to patic portal veins and peripheral hepatic veins. veins or splenomegaly was absent and be-
55 µg/dL, which is in the normal range. Three In our patient, the abnormal vein con- cause the abnormal vein was a patent ductus
months after the intervention, an arterial porto- nected the umbilical portion of the portal venosus, not a reopened one.
gram revealed a normal portal vein and occlu- vein and the inferior vena cava directly A patent ductus venosus is important to rec-
sion of the abnormal vein (Fig. 1E). Four years through the fissure for the ligamentum veno- ognize because it causes portosystemic en-
after embolization was performed, the patient’s sum. The portal vein at the umbilical portion cephalopathy during childhood. However,
symptoms had not recurred. connects with the umbilical vein and ductus only nine cases in adults have been reported
[5, 6]. Why portosystemic encephalopathy of- would not occur after embolization. Liver bi- patic dysfunction and severe hepatic steatosis due
ten develops later in life—even when the shunt opsy was not performed in our patient, but con- to a patent ductus venosus. Gastroenterology
1996;110:1964–1968
itself is congenital—is not known [2]. A patent firmation of the absence of liver cirrhosis by
3. Schwartz YM, Berkowitz D, Lorbert A. Transvenous
ductus venosus with mild symptoms of porto- biopsy might provide a more accurate progno- coil embolization of a patent ductus venosus in a 2-
systemic encephalopathy or heart failure may sis. On the other hand, placement of a reduction month-old child. Pediatrics 1999;103:1045–1047
be conservatively treated. When these symp- stent can gradually occlude the shunt. Liver 4. Marx M, Huber WD, Crone J, et al. Interventional
toms are not conservatively controlled, the congestion may occur to a lesser extent with stent implantation in a child with patent ductus
shunt must be closed by surgical banding or stent placement than with embolization. Never- venosus and pulmonary hypertension. Eur J Pedi-
transcatheter procedures. Only three reports theless, shunt flow still poses the risk of pulmo- atr 2001;160:501–504
5. Barjon P, Lamarque JL, Michel H, Fourcade J,
about transcatheter procedures for treatment of nary thrombosis, and one cannot predict when
Mimran A. Persistent ductus venosus without
patients with this disease, including one adult, the shunt will be completely occluded.
portal hypertension in a young alcoholic man.
appear in the literature [3, 4, 6]. Two of these We performed embolization through the ret- Gut 1972;13:982–985
reports describe embolizations, and the other rograde transcaval route. During embolization, 6. Shen B, Younossi ZM, Dolmatch B, et al. Patent
describes placement of a reduction stent to de- temporary balloon occlusion of the patent duc- ductus venosus in an adult presenting as pulmo-
crease shunt volume. tus venosus prevented migration of the coils as nary hypertension, right-sided heart failure, and
Embolization can be expected to have the a result of the high shunt flow. In another portosystemic encephalopathy. Am J Med 2001;
same effect as surgical banding, but emboliza- study, temporary balloon occlusion reduced 110:657–660
7. Mori H, Hayashi K, Fukuda T, et al. Intrahepatic
tion is less invasive. Liver congestion leading to the likelihood of coil migration and predicted
portosystemic venous shunt: occurrence in pa-
portal thrombosis has been reported to occur in portal hemodynamic changes after occlusion tients with and without liver cirrhosis. AJR
patients treated with surgical banding [1, 9], and [6]. We believe transcatheter intervention 1987;149:711–714
embolization may have the same risk. To evalu- through retrograde transcaval access to be the 8. Maeda T, Mori H, Aikawa H, Komatsu E, Ka-
American Journal of Roentgenology 2003.180:716-718.
ate the risk, we measured the portal venous treatment of choice for patients with symptom- gawa K. Therapeutic embolization of intrahepatic
pressure and performed arterial portography un- atic patent ductus venosus. portosystemic shunts by retrograde transcaval
der temporary balloon occlusion of the shunt catheterization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
1993;16:245–247
before embolization. The patient’s portal References 9. Kamata S, Kitayama Y, Usui N, et al. Patent duc-
venous pressure was minimally elevated, and tus venosus with a hypoplastic intrahepatic portal
1. Mitchell IM, Pollock JCG, Gibson AAM. Patent
arterial portography revealed good blood flow ductus venosus. Pediatr Cardiol 1991;12:181–183 system presenting intrapulmonary shunt: a case
and wide right portal branches. These findings 2. Uchino T, Endou F, Ikeda S, Shiraki K, Sera Y, treated with banding of the ductus venosus. J Pe-
might suggest that portal venous congestion Matsuda I. Three brothers with progressive he- diatr Surg 2000;35:655–657
1. Michael A. Leshen, Rajiv Devanagondi, David Saul, Apeksha Chaturvedi. 2022. Physiological fetal vascular shunts and failure to
regress: what the radiologist needs to know. Pediatric Radiology 20. . [Crossref]
2. Hiromi Muranishi, Yasuo Komura. 2020. Adult-onset portosystemic encephalopathy caused by patent ductus venosus successfully
treated with endovascular coil embolization: a rare case report. CVIR Endovascular 3:1. . [Crossref]
3. Zain Majid, Muhammad Manzoor ul Haque, Muhammad Danish Ashraf, Nasir Hassan Luck, Ameet Kumar Lalwani. 2019.
Intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in a young female: Views from a developing country. Journal of Translational Internal Medicine
7:3, 118-120. [Crossref]
4. David Llanos, Javier Armijo, Andrés Bodas, Esther Vaquero, Iñigo de la Pedraja, Juan Arrazola. 2013. Transjugular Closure of a
Patent Ductus Venosus in a Symptomatic 14-Year-Old Boy Using a Vascular Plug. The Journal of Pediatrics . [Crossref]
5. Yoshiaki Hara, Yoshinobu Sato, Satoshi Yamamoto, Hiroshi Oya, Masato Igarashi, Satoshi Abe, Hidenaka Kokai, Kohei Miura,
Takeshi Suda, Minoru Nomoto, Yutaka Aoyagi, Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama. 2013. Successful laparoscopic division of a patent ductus
venosus: report of a case. Surgery Today 43:4, 434-438. [Crossref]
6. Shuichi Tanoue, Hiro Kiyosue, Shunro Matsumoto, Hiromu Mori. 2009. Large Persistent Ductus Venosus: Retrograde
Transvenous Embolization with a Double-catheter Technique. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 20:6, 847-849.
[Crossref]
7. Karen M. Brown, Hassan Hal. 2009. Asymptomatic Congenital Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt. Radiology Case Reports 4:1,
255. [Crossref]
8. Manabu Maeda, Junichi Tazawa, Koichi Mori. 2009. Transvenous Embolization of Patent Ductus Venosus in Two Adult Cases.
American Journal of Roentgenology 2003.180:716-718.