宿务亚典耀圣心学校

SACRED HEART SCHOOL – ATENEO de CEBU

H. Abellana Street, Canduman, Mandaue City
S.Y. 2021-2022

Senior High School Department

STEM Work Immersion e-Portfolio Guidelines

A Work Immersion Electronic Portfolio (WI e-Portfolio) is a document that will capture your entire
Senior High School Work Immersion Experience. Specifically, it aims to measure the following:

1. Your ability to appreciate the nature, dynamics, and value of the world of work thereby
expanding your horizons to your career options in STEM disciplines;
2. Your ability to apply the knowledge (concepts, theories, principles) and skills learned from the
Senior High School subjects particularly the STEM Curriculum; and
3. The ability to make connection with the entire Senior High School Curricular,
Co-curricular/Extra-curricular offerings and in understanding/solving issues in school, in the
partner community, and in society in general.

In making the portfolio, make sure that the following components are present:

 COVERPAGE (Include the logo of the school, name/members of the group, inclusive date
of the immersion)
 TABLE OF CONTENTS (give us an impression that your content are logically presented
and well-thought out)
 Group Immersion OVERVIEW/INTRODUCTION (Give us a snapshot of the group’s
immersion experience BUT not to the point that there is nothing more to expect in this
portfolio, at least 1-2 paragraph will do)
 TRAINING PLAN - Final Version of your individual, customized (Must be complete &
tailored-fit to respective research) – 1 per member
 BEST WORKS/EXHIBITS – provide a detailed account of your actual outputs, an
exemplar/best product/service, its outcome (short-term/long-term impact), line-up of
activities participated, hosted/organized, work done report, and list of
accomplishments.
 INDIVIDUAL REFLECTIVE SYNTHESIS (for every member) of your entire 2-Week
Immersion experience. A reflective synthesis covers your experience from pre-
immersion orientation, to first day and actual endorsement, and reflection on the day-
to-day event during your actual engagement, you may include post-immersion activities
for as long as it is related to the nature of your STEM immersion e.g research-related
task, giving-back to the community/presentation to partner communities.
 APPENDICES – (supplementary materials, documents to show that you have
satisfactorily completed the work immersion subject)
o Gantt Chart and Progress Report
o Dissemination of the Research Study
Grading Mechanics

Work Immersion e-portfolio forms part of the 70% of your Work Immersion Subject Grade. To
get the full 70% be guided by the aims and objective of the entire work immersion portfolio, the other
being 30% for Work Immersion Adviser’s Rating. To compute your Work for the Work Immersion e-
Portfolio, a separate peer observation rating sheet shall be used. Sample computation is provided
below:

GROUP SCORE (using the immersion portfolio rubric) x ____% (level of proficiency
results of the peer evaluation sheet) = FINAL INDIVIDUAL WORK IMMERISON e-
PORTFOLIO GRADE (70%).

Submission Guidelines:

1. Download the work immersion e-portfolio rubric. Insert it after the cover page.
2. Compile and organize your e-portfolio entries, submit in PDF format/file. An Assignment Tab
will be created by the work immersion adviser. Only the team leader will upload the group’s
output.
Be sure to double check all required entries.
3. Submit your Group Work Immersion e-Portfolio to your Work Immersion Adviser for grading
purposes;
4. Refer to the attached work immersion portfolio rubric.
 宿务亚典耀圣心学校
SACRED HEART SCHOOL – ATENEO de CEBU
H. Abellana Street, Canduman, Mandaue City

STEM WORK IMMERSION e-PORTFOLIO RUBRIC

NAME OF STUDENT(s): __________________________________ DATE OF SUBMISSION:_____________
_____________________________________________________________ REMARKS :__________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Criteria Intervention Developing Proficient Advanced SCORE
Required
4 & below 5-6 7-8 9-10
Entries are mostly Entries are mostly Almost all entries are
Entries are mostly
included but not included but included and very
included but
well discussed lacks minor well covered.
poorly discussed
CONTENT & details
Reader can follow Report is well written
ORGANIZATION Report is poorly
report with effort. Report is and clearly
X2 written style and
Its organization generally clear organized. Reader
poorly organized
not clearly well but with few can easily follow line
thought out confusing entries of reasoning.

Student Student Student

Group/student- demonstrates a demonstrates a demonstrates an in-
researchers minimal reflection general reflection depth reflection on,
demonstrate a on, and on, and and personalization
lack of reflection personalization of, personalization of, of the theories,
on, or the theories, the theories, concepts, and
personalization concepts, and concepts and experiences from
of, theories, experiences from experiences from the 2-week
concepts, and the 2-week the 2-week immersion.
experiences immersion.
DEPTH OF immersion.
from the 2-week Viewpoints and
REFLECTION immersion. Viewpoints and interpretations are
Viewpoints and
X4 interpretations are insightful and well-
interpretations are
Viewpoints and unsupported or supported. Clear,
supported.
interpretations supported with detailed examples
are missing, superficial/ Appropriate from personal
inappropriate, Irrelevant examples are experiences are
and /or examples/ flawed provided from provided as
unsupported arguments. personal ang applicable.
Examples are not group experiences.
Reflection is Reflection is well
Examples are provided or are
anchored on the anchored on the
not provided. irrelevant to the
WIP objectives. WIP objectives.
assignment.
 Students convey Students convey Students convey Students convey
inadequate limited evidence of evidence of strong evidence of
evidence of reflection on own reflection on own reflection on own
reflection on work in response work with a work in response to
own work in to the WIP personal the WIP objectives.
response to the objectives response to WIP
stated WIP objectives. Report
objectives. Report demonstrates
demonstrates less Report significant personal
Personal growth than adequate demonstrates growth and
and awareness personal growth satisfactory awareness of
are not evident and awareness personal growth deeper meaning
and/or through few or and awareness through making
demonstrates a simplistic through some inferences made,
PERSONAL
GROWTH neutral inferences made, inferences made, examples, well
(including experience with examples, insights, examples, developed insights,
communication/ a negligible and/or challenges insights, and and substantial
dissemination personal impact. that are not well challenges. depth in
of research developed. Students provide perceptions and
study to the Students lack some thought of challenges. It
target enough There is a minimal the future synthesizes current
community)
inferences, thought of the implications of experience into
X4
examples, future implications current future implications.
personal insights of current experience.
and challenges, experience. Final report
and/or future Final report includes anecdotes
implications are Final report includes that display the
overlooked. includes limited anecdotes that assimilation of the
evidence of the display the school’s core values
Final report did assimilation of the assimilation of (7 C’s) and provide
not include how school’s core the school’s core extensive examples
the school’s 7 values (7 C’s). values (7 C’s) but of how these were
C’s were used in provided only few used in the
the workplace. examples of how workplace.
these were used
in the workplace.

TOTAL
100

_____________________________ ____________________________
SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME
OF WORK IMMERSION ADVISER OF STEM CLUSTER HEAD

DATE SIGNED: ___________________ __________________________

 SAMPLE WORK IMMERSION PEER EVALUATION RUBRIC

宿务亚典耀圣心学校
SACRED HEART SCHOOL – ATENEO de CEBU
H. Abellana St., Canduman, Mandaue City
Senior High School Department

STEM Work Immersion

SELF & PEER-Assessment Tool

Class No. Signature:

Name: Date:
Section: Instructor:
TOA: STEM WORK IMMERSION PORTFOLIO – Peer Evaluation
The interaction and dynamics of the team are significantly influenced by the contribution of each member of the team.
Thus, this peer evaluation will help us consider the effort and contribution of each member to the completion of the task. Below
is a matrix describing the level of contribution and collaboration of a member of the team. Please assign a letter signifier that fits the
level of collaboration and contribution of each member. Be judicious in evaluating since this will impact a higher component in the
grade. Thank you so much!

Letter Signifier Description

Consistently attends in the planning and construction/performance of the needed
process or part of the project. Shows high interest in the project by sharing a lot of
A
ideas and suggestions to the group in order to improve the project. Is with the team
(Advanced)
through the entire duration of the development, completion, presentation, and
exhibition of the final product.
Consistently attends in the planning and construction/performance of the needed
process or part of the project. Shows considerable interest in the project by sharing
P
some good ideas and suggestions to the group in order to improve the project. Is with
(Proficient)
the team oftentimes in the development, completion, presentation, and exhibition of the
final product.
Often attends in the planning and construction/performance of the needed process or
AP part of the project. Shows satisfactory interest in the project by sharing some ideas
(Approaching and suggestions for the group to consider in order to improve the project. Is with the
Proficiency) team in most of the time in the development, completion, presentation, and exhibition
of the final product.
Often attends in the planning and construction/performance of the needed process or
D part of the project. Shows interest in the project by sharing few ideas and suggestions
(Developing) for the group to consider in order to improve the project. Is with the team in most of the
time in the development, completion, presentation, and exhibition of the final product.
Seldom attends in the planning and construction/performance of the needed process or
part of the project. Shows little interest in the project by sharing minimal ideas and
B
suggestions but are irrelevant to the improvement of the project. Is with the team at
(Beginning)
limited points in the development, completion, presentation, and exhibition of the final
product.
Rarely attends in the planning and construction/performance of the needed process or
NI
part of the project. Lacks the interest in the project by sharing very limited ideas and
(Needs
suggestions to the group in order to improve the project. Missed to be with the team in
Improvement)
the development, completion, presentation, and exhibition of the final product.

Member’s Name Letter Signifier

Note: Each member of the Team has to submit an individual self and peer rating. Work Immersion adviser may
add an Assignment Tab for this task.