Order ID 370530681: General Metrics

Report:
Order ID 370530681
Order ID 370530681
by NCT
General metrics
15,171 2,395 119 9 min 34 sec 18 min 25 sec
characters words sentences reading speaking
time time
Score Writing Issues
66 195 53 142
Issues left Critical Advanced
This text scores better than 66%

of all texts checked by Grammarly
Plagiarism
This text hasn’t been checked for plagiarism
Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 1 of 25

Report: Order ID 370530681
Writing Issues
82 Correctness
1 Misuse of semicolons, quotation marks, etc.
3 Incorrect noun number
25 Punctuation in compound/complex
sentences
6 Determiner use (a/an/the/this, etc.)
8 Mixed dialects of english
8 Incorrect verb forms
10 Wrong or missing prepositions
2 Faulty subject-verb agreement
4 Misspelled words
2 Closing punctuation
2 Confused words
7 Comma misuse within clauses
1 Misplaced words or phrases
1 Conjunction use
1 Incorrect phrasing
1 Modal verbs
72 Clarity
30 Wordy sentences
24 Passive voice misuse
2 Word choice
3 Hard-to-read text
3 Intricate text
10 Unclear sentences

40 Engagement
40 Word choice
1 Delivery
1 Inappropriate colloquialisms
Unique Words 35%

Measures vocabulary diversity by calculating the unique words
percentage of words used only once in your
document
Rare Words 35%

Measures depth of vocabulary by identifying words rare words
that are not among the 5,000 most common English
words.
Word Length 5.2

Measures average word length characters per word
Sentence Length 20.1

Measures average sentence length words per sentence

Order ID 370530681
3
Tolich, M. "Internal con dentiality: When con dentiality assurances fail

relational informants." Qualitative Sociology 27 (2004): 106.
Taylor, S J.. "Observing abuse: Professional ethics and personal morality in eld
research." Qualitative Sociology 10 (1987): 302.
Wiles, R, G Crow, S Heath and V Charles. "The management of con dentiality
and anonymity in social research." International Journal of Social Research
Methodology 11 (2008): 428.
1
Wolfgang, M E.. "Con dentiality in criminological research and other ethical."
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 72 (1981):
Wiles, R, V Charles, C Graham and S Heath. "Researching researchers: Lessons
for research ethics." Qualitative Research 6 (2006): 299.
Scarce, R. "(No) trial (but) tribulations." When courts and ethnography con ict.
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 23 (1994):
Title: Ethical Essay

Student's Name
Institutional Af liation
Course Number: Course Name
Instructor Name
Assignment Due Date
Title:
IS IT MORE ETHICAL TO KEEP CRIMINAL SUSPECTS ANONYMOUS OR PUBLIC?
2 3
Not at all like in that frame of mind as the U.S., South Korean regulation and
media showed much of the time safeguard the characters of criminal suspects.
4
As per the crook code and Korean National Police Agency rules, it is run of the
5
mill for a suspect's face to be covered and for just their last name to be utilized
6
when they show up in the media. Uncovering a suspects' character, allies of the
7
right to namelessness contend, sabotages the rule of being free and clear by
default.

8
The show was broken in 2009, nonetheless, when chronic executioner Kang Ho-
before long's face was uncovered by the media, referring to individuals' on the
right track to be aware and setting off a discussion over how to adjust the
9
privileges of suspects and the overall population. That very year the Korea
News Editors' Association updated its morals rules to permit more prominent
10
thought for "public interest" with regards to capturing those blamed for
11
genuine wrongdoings. An alteration set forward by the GNP was spent the next
12 13
year permitting a suspect's name, age and face to be unveiled on the off chance
14
that the police have acquired an admission or indisputable proof of culpability
15
and the wrongdoing is adequately not kidding. Yet, while the legitimate reason
16
for distinguishing suspects presently exists, the training remains somewhat
interesting.
17,18 19 20
A main contention progressed for naming suspects before charge is that it
21 22
urges different casualties to approach and report wrongdoings. This is much of
23 24 25
the time referred to in sexual offenses since it gives casualties the certainty to
26
approach feeling that they will be accepted. In any case, is naming a suspect
27
with the expectation that it might urge others to approach generally an
28
adequate explanation? Considering that people are named when charged,
29 30 31
casualties can in any case approach by then.
How then, at that point, do we guarantee that the freedoms of suspects are
32 33 34
genuinely offset with the public interest of naming them? One proposition is to
35 36
administer for a total restriction on naming suspects before charge subject to
37
excellent conditions. In March 2015 the Commons Home Affairs Select
38
Committee required a legal restriction on delivering the names of suspects
39 40 41 42
blamed for sexual offenses that poor person yet been charged. Nonetheless, is
43 44 45
it reasonable to suspects of different violations that we focus on those blamed
46,47
for sexual offenses?

48
It appears off-base to sort suspects as indicated by the wrongdoing of which
49,50 51 52,53 5
they are charged. People are wrongly blamed for bunch offenses: the individual
55,56
effect can be similarly devastating. Being blamed for an offense like assault
57
has signi cant repercussions. However, for what reason should a singular
blamed for a genuine non-sexual and possibly vocation nishing wrongdoing
like misrepresentation not get similar assurances?
One thing is sure: the ongoing position is unsuitable. While direction against
58
naming suspects is trailed by the police and controllers, zero power over
59 60
suspects is being named in the press. A solid contention exists for an
61
adjustment of the law to boycott the naming of suspects blamed for any
wrongdoing, save in extraordinary conditions.
62,63
Contentions concerning what is "uncommon conditions" can then be
progressed under the watchful eye of an appointed authority who can
64 65
appropriately adjust the competing contentions. This would imply that the
naming of pre-charge suspects will be a painstakingly thought of, controlled
66
choice where the press can be considered responsible assuming an individual
67
is named without the court's approval.
68
For criminal legal advisors, this additionally brings up the issue of suspect
69
namelessness. It has for some time been the law that complainants in sexual
70 71 72
offenses are conceded long lasting obscurity, whether their charges lead to an
arraignment and no matter what the decision. Numerous legitimate
campaigners have contended that suspects ought to partake in a similar right
while assumed guiltless, particularly given the lamentable impact distribution
of sexual claims can have. Given the new exposure about horribly inadequate
CPS arraignments and disappointments in revelation, the contention for
suspect obscurity is presently a well known eeting trend on which to jump.
In any case, on the topic of suspect namelessness, we should ask ourselves:

73
1. Is there actually an intelligent string for this change?
74
2. How might it really function practically speaking?
75 76
Right off the bat, assuming one upholds obscurity for suspects this should
apply to all suspects and not simply 'superstars'. While there is a pragmatic
77
differentiation between a formerly in the public suspect eye, and a suspect who
was not, such a quali cation is dif cult to perceive in regulation basically on
78
the grounds that the general reputation of any individual is continuously
evolving.
79
Indeed: individuals reserve the option to be aware
Whenever an especially horrendous homicide happens in our general public, a
80
discussion happens online about whether or not the homicide suspect's very
81
own data, including name and photograph, ought to be delivered to the general
82
population. However it is a questionable issue with numerous dif culties, for
83 84
example, the assumption of honesty, I am supportive of delivering such data to
the general population, though restricted to cases that have turned into an
85
overall population issue and include violations of serious savagery and
abomination.
Such measures, most importantly, fall inside individuals' on the right track to
be aware. These actions could go quite far in forestalling further wrongdoings.
86
Clearly, it diminishes the probability of additional violations being perpetrated
by killers as standard residents come out as comfortable with the essences of
such lawbreakers.
87
That's what it's implied assuming lawbreakers know that their face has been
88 89
delivered to the overall population they will be substantially more hesitant to
attempt to carry out another wrongdoing.
90
Likewise, delivering pictures of suspects could have a discouragement impact
91
as potential lawbreakers realize that they are signi cantly more liable to get

92,93
found out. With everything taken into account, it will by and large make
progress toward diminishing the chance of such horrendous violations.
All the more explicitly, studies have shown that individuals with a lawbreaker
record, particularly for violations like homicide, equipped burglary and assault,
94 95
are probably going to carry out such wrongdoings once more ― there is around
96
a 50 percent possibility.
9
As per a concentrate by the Korean Police Department, around 50% individuals
98 99
captured in 2008 had a lawbreaker record. Taking into account this reality, it is
sensible to deliver the individual data of homicide suspects to diminish
violations.
The principal contention that individuals raise against this arrangement is that
it abuses the fundamental basic freedoms of these hoodlums.
100
Notwithstanding, we should recall that such freedoms are not outright. Such
101
privileges, while signi cant, can and ought to be restricted assuming they
102 103 104
con ict with other essential privileges, like opportunity of articulation.
105
Another huge con contention frequently raised is that under the rule of the
107 106
assumption of guiltlessness, suspects ought not to be dealt with like
lawbreakers. Be that as it may, the genuine reason for this guideline is to build
up and expand the obligation of the administrative position to demonstrate the
108 109
culpability of the individual blamed. Its motivation isn't to treat the charged in
110 111 112
the very same manner as a normal resident. However this is an almost
113
negligible difference and should not be manhandled, in instances of incredibly
brutal and hazardous suspects, a somewhat unique disposition should be
taken and the data delivered.
114 115
Taking into account that this strategy is restricted to kill suspects of an
116
incredibly genuine nature, obviously individuals' on the whole correct to be
117
aware and be educated offsets the potential infringement regarding the

118
common freedoms of the suspects. In such cases, the common liberties
119 120
viewpoint is to some degree offset by the advantages that the general public
overall harvests by disregarding it.
Considering the new abrupt expansion in vicious and monstrous violations
121
committed in Korean culture, it is without a doubt really smart to deliver the
122
data and photographs of such individuals who are thought to be risky.
123 124 125
No: It implies culpability in court of popular assessment
126
My dad once told me, the most important resources an individual can have are
his standing and training. These are the contending interests in question in the
127
discussion about whether an individual's decent name and picture ought to be
128
announced regarding a simple capture before a conviction is made, for the sole
129
purpose of illuminating the general population.
Government straightforwardness is signi cant in a vote based system.
Community to government records permits us to screen our administration and
130
guarantee responsibility. Responsibility guarantees our privileges are
131 132
safeguarded so residents don't baf ingly vanish into a dark opening because
of a one-sided judge or degenerate of cial. Tragically this assurance is a two
133 134
sided deal that can be utilized to rebuff the denounced by freely it is reached to
disgrace him before a conviction. The test we face is to adjust our right to data
with our right to protection.
135
In the data age, safeguarding security has turned into a unique test with
136
serious and enduring outcomes assuming that we fall at. As Warren Buffet
likes to say, "It requires 20 years to construct a standing and ve minutes to
destroy it." Make that ve seconds at the present Internet speeds. In the
137
psyche of the public an allegation might be comparable to a conviction,
138
especially with no reaction from the denounced (respondents are normally
trained by their lawyers not to discuss their case).

139
The media might run the story over and over like a mesmerizing infomercial or
drama. Many will gure they more likely than not accomplished something
140
wrong no matter what the result of the case: "Where there is smoke, there is
141
re." This lopsided view might be built up where allegations are much of the
time headline news while the quittances may not make the paper.
142
All in all, for what reason would it be a good idea for us to think often about the
143
protection or notoriety of the denounced? We ought to mind since it is truly
144,145
about safeguarding our own freedoms and holding society to a norm before we
rebuff an individual for a supposed wrong. The distribution of names regarding
crime in the present media can add up to a lifetime sentence in the court of
popular assessment or the death penalty of an individual's standing.
Some in this discussion would excuse our protection freedoms by it are not
146 147 148
outright to remind us our privileges. According to my point of view, it isn't really
149,150
that one right ought to counterbalance another when they converge, rather,
151
they ought to be painstakingly adjusted, and controlled as little as conceivable
152,156
to account for each other. I accept we really want more discourse on the most
153 154 155,156
pro cient method to best adjust security interests instead of lose them in our
chase to catch and disgrace a hunter in the present data age.
157 158
Do we accept that an individual ought not be rebuffed until demonstrated
blameworthy? Improve to safeguard the possibly honest from public
embarrassment and bias regardless of whether that implies our regulations will
159
unexpectedly bear the cost of the blameworthy these equivalent assurances?
160 161
Or on the other hand improve to forfeit the standing of a blameless group to
cause our prompt social vengeance for the individuals who may be
blameworthy?
Some contend distribution could assist with forestalling wrongdoing.
162 163
Regardless of whether the distribution of personalities were deferred until the

judgment stage for a situation, the general population could get a superior
164
equilibrium of data on the denounced that would limit the biased impact an
165
exposed allegation has over the long run, but still disgrace those observed
166 167 168
blameworthy despite everything affect would be crooks .
169 170
Courts in the U.S. have held that biased pre preliminary exposure can risk a
171 172
respondent's on the whole correct to a fair preliminary and have changed the
173 174
preliminary scene to a place where the exposure was probably not going to
175
have biased the jury. However, South Korea is just somewhat bigger than the
province of Indiana. The scene choices are altogether restricted, and the
exposure is bound to affect the whole country.
176
Biased exposure before the preliminary might deny a respondent fair
177
treatment. This has potential risk to the honestly blamed as well as to the
178,180
general population assuming such bias later makes a court on offer upset a
179
conviction of a genuinely blameworthy criminal for absence of fair treatment.
We should be straightforward. Is the arrival of names and faces at this early
181 182
point in the law enforcement process truly to instruct general society about a
hazardous criminal running wild so we can forestall future wrongdoing, or is it
to engage the general population, satisfy interest, and sell a story?
183
Maybe we could track down the right equilibrium by applying the Golden Rule:
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
After this isn't about how we want to treat others ― it is about how we would
have others treat us if we were to imagine being in their position.
How before long do you truly require that name or photograph of the
184 185
denounced? Could it at any point pause or would we say we will imperil the
186
eventual fate of a possibly guiltless individual to ful ll public interest?
187
All things considered, the litigant (as they then, at that point, would be) is as
yet assumed guiltless. Those new imperfect assault indictments were far

190 188 189,190

beyond this stage and either near, or during, the preliminary. Honest men like
191 192,193
Liam Allen, Samson Makele and Isaac Itiary would in any case have confronted
194
a year or so of their names being distributed as supposed attackers, before
195
their charges were dropped.

1. .. Misuse of semicolons, Correctness

quotation marks, etc.
2. Not at all like → Unlike Wordy sentences Clarity
3. regulation → regulations Incorrect noun number Correctness
4. is run Passive voice misuse Clarity
5. be utilized Passive voice misuse Clarity
6. suspects' → suspect's Incorrect noun number Correctness
7. free → accessible Word choice Engagement
8. The show was broken Passive voice misuse Clarity
9. very → same Word choice Engagement
10. with regards to → regarding Wordy sentences Clarity
11. was spent Passive voice misuse Clarity
12. , and Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
13. be unveiled Passive voice misuse Clarity
14. culpability → guilt Word choice Clarity
15. An alteration set forward by the GNP was Hard-to-read text Clarity
spent the next year permitting a
suspect's name, age and face to be
unveiled on the off chance that the police
have acquired an admission or
indisputable proof of culpability and the
wrongdoing is adequately not kidding.
16. presently Wordy sentences Clarity
17. A main → The main Determiner use Correctness

(a/an/the/this, etc.)

18. main → central Word choice Engagement
19. contention Wordy sentences Clarity
20. the charge, or a charge Determiner use Correctness

21. different → other Word choice Engagement
22. This Intricate text Clarity
23. much of the time → often Wordy sentences Clarity
24. offenses → offences Mixed dialects of English Correctness
25. casualties → losses, deaths Word choice Engagement
26. they will be accepted Passive voice misuse Clarity
27. approach → come Word choice Engagement
28. named → called Word choice Engagement
29. , in Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
30. case, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
31. approach → approached Incorrect verb forms Correctness
32. are genuinely offset Passive voice misuse Clarity
33. with → by Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
34. of → in Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
35. for Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness

36. , subject Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
37. 20 5, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
38. restriction → limitation Word choice Engagement
40. person → persons Incorrect noun number Correctness
41. have yet Incorrect verb forms Correctness
42. with. Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
43. suspects → suspect Incorrect verb forms Correctness
44. of Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
45. blamed → accused Word choice Engagement
46. offenses → crimes Word choice Engagement
48. of → with Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
49. are charged Passive voice misuse Clarity
50. It appears off-base to sort suspects as Unclear sentences Clarity

indicated by the wrongdoing of which
they are charged.
51. are wrongly blamed Passive voice misuse Clarity
52. of offenses Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness

54. individual → personal Word choice Engagement
55. an offense → a crime Word choice Engagement
56. offense → offence Mixed dialects of English Correctness
57. for what reason Wordy sentences Clarity
58. is trailed Passive voice misuse Clarity
59. being Wordy sentences Clarity
60. named → called, quoted Word choice Engagement
61. an adjustment of → adjusting Wordy sentences Clarity
62. what is Wordy sentences Clarity
63. is → are Faulty subject-verb Correctness

agreement
64. contentions → Word choice Engagement

views, ideas, arguments, opinions
66. , assuming Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
67. is named Passive voice misuse Clarity
68. For criminal legal advisors, this Unclear sentences Clarity

additionally brings up the issue of
suspect namelessness.
69. for some time Wordy sentences Clarity
71. are conceded Passive voice misuse Clarity

72. long lasting → long-lasting Misspelled words Correctness
73. actually Wordy sentences Clarity
74. really Wordy sentences Clarity
75. Right off the bat, assuming one upholds Unclear sentences Clarity
obscurity for suspects this should apply
to all suspects and not simply
'superstars'.
76. suspects, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
77. eye, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
78. on the grounds that → Wordy sentences Clarity

because
79. aware. Closing punctuation Correctness
80. happens → occurs Word choice Engagement
81. ought to → should Wordy sentences Clarity
82. However, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
83. , I → ; I, . I Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
84. delivering → providing Word choice Engagement
85. serious → severe Word choice Engagement
86. Clearly, it Wordy sentences Clarity
87. it's implied Passive voice misuse Clarity

88. been delivered Passive voice misuse Clarity
89. population, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
90. discouragement → discouraging Confused words Correctness
91. get → getting Incorrect verb forms Correctness
92. , by and large, Comma misuse within Correctness

clauses
93. by and large Wordy sentences Clarity
94. will probably Wordy sentences Clarity
95. ― there → . There Hard-to-read text Clarity
96. percent → per cent Mixed dialects of English Correctness
97. of individuals Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
98. Taking into account → Wordy sentences Clarity

Considering
99. Taking into account this reality Misplaced words or phrases Correctness
100. freedoms → liberties Word choice Engagement

compound/complex
sentences
102. privileges → bene ts, rights, claims Word choice Engagement
103. the opportunity Determiner use Correctness

104. of → for Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
105. huge → considerable, colossal, vast Word choice Engagement

106. be dealt Passive voice misuse Clarity
107. Another huge con contention frequently Unclear sentences Clarity

raised is that under the rule of the
assumption of guiltlessness, suspects
ought not to be dealt with like
lawbreakers.
108. culpability → guilt Word choice Clarity
109. charged → charge Confused words Correctness
110. very Wordy sentences Clarity
111. a normal → Word choice Engagement

an average, a typical, an ordinary,
a regular
112. However, Comma misuse within Correctness

clauses
113. , in → ; in, . In Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
114. Taking into account → Wordy sentences Clarity

Considering
115. kill → killing Incorrect verb forms Correctness
116. obviously, Comma misuse within Correctness

clauses
117. be educated Passive voice misuse Clarity
118. common → everyday Word choice Engagement
119. to some degree Wordy sentences Clarity
120. is to some degree offset Passive voice misuse Clarity
121. really smart → brilliant, genius Word choice Engagement

122. are thought Passive voice misuse Clarity
123. a court, or the court Determiner use Correctness

124. the popular Determiner use Correctness

125. assessment. Closing punctuation Correctness
126. that the Conjunction use Correctness
127. decent → proper, respected Word choice Engagement
128. made, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
129. These are the contending interests in Unclear sentences Clarity

question in the discussion about whether
an individual's decent name and picture
ought to be announced regarding a
simple capture before a conviction is
made, for the sole purpose of illuminating
the general population.
130. guarantees → ensures Word choice Engagement
131. are safeguarded Passive voice misuse Clarity
132. , so Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
133. two sided → two-sided Misspelled words Correctness
134. can be utilized Passive voice misuse Clarity
135. In the data age, safeguarding security Unclear sentences Clarity

has turned into a unique test with serious
and enduring outcomes assuming that we
fall at.
136. serious → severe Word choice Engagement

137. public, Comma misuse within Correctness

clauses
138. are normally → Word choice Engagement

usually are, are usually, are typically,
are generally
139. over and over → repeatedly Wordy sentences Clarity
140. what Wordy sentences Clarity
141. be built up Passive voice misuse Clarity
142. All in all, for → For Wordy sentences Clarity
143. truly → genuinely Word choice Engagement
144. own Wordy sentences Clarity
145. We ought to mind since it is truly about Unclear sentences Clarity

safeguarding our own freedoms and
holding society to a norm before we
rebuff an individual for a supposed
wrong.
146. to remind → reminding Incorrect verb forms Correctness
147. of our Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
148. From my point of view, In my view Incorrect phrasing Correctness
149. , rather → ; rather, . Rather Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
150. rather → instead Word choice Engagement
151. adjusted, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
152. really Wordy sentences Clarity

153. adjust → change Word choice Engagement
154. to adjust security interests best Inappropriate colloquialisms Delivery
155. lose → losing Incorrect verb forms Correctness
156. I accept we really want more discourse on Unclear sentences Clarity

the most pro cient method to best adjust
security interests instead of lose them in
our chase to catch and disgrace a hunter
in the present data age.
157. not to Modal verbs Correctness
158. be rebuffed Passive voice misuse Clarity
159. blameworthy → guilty, culpable Word choice Engagement
160. , on Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
161. hand, Comma misuse within Correctness

clauses
162. were → was Faulty subject-verb Correctness

agreement
163. the distribution of personalities were Passive voice misuse Clarity

deferred
164. biased → little Word choice Engagement
165. run, Comma misuse within Correctness

clauses
166. would be → would-be Misspelled words Correctness
167. be crooks → be crooked Incorrect verb forms Correctness
168. Regardless of whether the distribution of Hard-to-read text Clarity

personalities were deferred until the
judgment stage for a situation, the

general population could get a superior

equilibrium of data on the denounced
that would limit the biased impact an
exposed allegation has over the long run,
but still disgrace those o…
169. biased → little, limited Word choice Engagement
170. pre preliminary → pre-preliminary Misspelled words Correctness
171. , on the whole, Comma misuse within Correctness

clauses
172. preliminary → Word choice Engagement

initial, primary, prior, vague
173. preliminary → Word choice Engagement

initial, introductory, primary, prior
174. exposure → direction Word choice Engagement
175. bigger → Word choice Engagement

more signi cant, more prominent,
more extensive
176. Biased → Little, Limited Word choice Engagement

compound/complex
sentences
179. the absence Determiner use Correctness

180. This has potential risk to the honestly Unclear sentences Clarity
blamed as well as to the general
population assuming such bias later
makes a court on offer upset a conviction
of a genuinely blameworthy criminal for
absence of fair treatment.
181. truly → indeed Word choice Engagement

182. to instruct → instructing Wordy sentences Clarity
183. right → proper Word choice Engagement
184. at any point Wordy sentences Clarity
185. , or Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
186. ful ll → ful l Mixed dialects of English Correctness
187. All things considered, the Wordy sentences Clarity
188. near, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
189. during, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
190. Those new imperfect assault indictments Unclear sentences Clarity

were far beyond this stage and either
near, or during, the preliminary.
191. , in Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
192. in any case Wordy sentences Clarity
193. case, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
194. attackers, Punctuation in Correctness

compound/complex
sentences
195. were dropped Passive voice misuse Clarity

Order ID 370530681: General Metrics

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Order ID 370530681: General Metrics

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report:

Score Writing Issues

This text scores better than 66%

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 1 of 25

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 2 of 25

Unique Words 35%

Rare Words 35%

Word Length 5.2

Sentence Length 20.1

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 3 of 25

Tolich, M. "Internal con dentiality: When con dentiality assurances fail

Title: Ethical Essay

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 4 of 25

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 5 of 25

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 6 of 25

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 7 of 25

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 8 of 25

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 9 of 25

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 10 of 25

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 11 of 25

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 12 of 25

190 188 189,190

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 13 of 25

1. .. Misuse of semicolons, Correctness

2. Not at all like → Unlike Wordy sentences Clarity

3. regulation → regulations Incorrect noun number Correctness

4. is run Passive voice misuse Clarity

5. be utilized Passive voice misuse Clarity

6. suspects' → suspect's Incorrect noun number Correctness

7. free → accessible Word choice Engagement

8. The show was broken Passive voice misuse Clarity

9. very → same Word choice Engagement

10. with regards to → regarding Wordy sentences Clarity

11. was spent Passive voice misuse Clarity

12. , and Punctuation in Correctness

13. be unveiled Passive voice misuse Clarity

14. culpability → guilt Word choice Clarity

16. presently Wordy sentences Clarity

17. A main → The main Determiner use Correctness

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 14 of 25

18. main → central Word choice Engagement

19. contention Wordy sentences Clarity

20. the charge, or a charge Determiner use Correctness

21. different → other Word choice Engagement

22. This Intricate text Clarity

23. much of the time → often Wordy sentences Clarity

24. offenses → offences Mixed dialects of English Correctness

25. casualties → losses, deaths Word choice Engagement

26. they will be accepted Passive voice misuse Clarity

27. approach → come Word choice Engagement

28. named → called Word choice Engagement

29. , in Punctuation in Correctness

30. case, Punctuation in Correctness

31. approach → approached Incorrect verb forms Correctness

32. are genuinely offset Passive voice misuse Clarity

33. with → by Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness

34. of → in Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness

35. for Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness

Report was generated on Thursday, May 12, 2022, 04:23 PM Page 15 of 25

36. , subject Punctuation in Correctness

37. 20 5, Punctuation in Correctness

38. restriction → limitation Word choice Engagement