Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OF
REASONING
2022/04/01
T R A D I T I O N A L S QUA R E O F O P P O S I T I O N
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT 23
a. True.
Since they are contradictories, if one is false, then the
other is true.
5 . F. 1 . I V 7
b. False.
Since they are contraries, they cannot both be true at the
same time.
5 . F. 1 . I V 1 4
b. False.
Since they are contradictories, if one is true, then the
other is false.
5 . F. 1 . I V 1 5
c. Undetermined.
Since they are subcontraries, they can both be true at the
same time.
5 . F. 1 . I V 1 9
b. False.
Since they are contradictories, if one is true, then the
other is false.
5 . F. 1 . I V 2 0
c. Undetermined.
Since these fall under subalternation, if the particular is
true, then the corresponding universal could be either
true or false.
5 . F. 2 8
S: bank loans
P: low-interest loans
Some S are P.
Some S are not P.
Invalid
5 . F. 2 9
S: used books
P: high-priced books
Invalid
5 . F. 2 1 0
All S are P.
Some S are P.
Valid
5 . F. 2 1 1
S: text messages
P: interesting pieces of writing
Invalid
5 . F. 2 1 2
All dogs are social animals.Therefore, some dogs are social animals.
S: dogs
P: social animals
All S are P.
Some S are P.
Valid
5 . F. 2 1 3
S: soft drinks
P: acid-based beverages
All S are P.
No S are P.
Invalid
5 . F. 2 1 4
S: batteries
P: perfectly efficient devices.
No S are P.
Some S are P.
Invalid
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT 24
Convertend
A-proposition: All S are P.
Corresponding particular
I-proposition: Some S are P.
Converse
I-proposition: Some P are S.
C O N V E R S I O N B Y L I M I TAT I O N
• Example
All apples are fruits.
Some fruits are apples.
S = apples
P = fruits
All S are P.
Some P are S.
Valid by limitation
OBVERSION IN MODERN
I N T E R P R E TAT I O N
OBVERSION IN
T R A D I T I O N A L I N T E R P R E TAT I O N
CONTRAPOSITION IN MODERN
I N T E R P R E TAT I O N
CONTRAPOSITION IN TRADITIONAL
I N T E R P R E TAT I O N
• The only difference in contraposition between modern and traditional interpretations is
for the E-propositions.
• Contraposition by limitation
• Valid by limitation
Given proposition
E-proposition: No S are P.
Corresponding particular
O-proposition: Some S are not P.
Contrapositive
O-proposition: Some non-P are not non-S.
CONTRAPOSITION IN TRADITIONAL
I N T E R P R E TAT I O N
• Example
No apples are animals.
Some non-animals are not non-apples.
S = apples
P = animals
No S are P.
Some non-P are not non-S.
Valid by limitation
E X E R C I S E S - VA L I D B Y L I M I T A T I O N