Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/267449962
Design of a vertical-axis wind turbine: how the aspect ratio affects the
turbine's performance
CITATIONS READS
130 20,450
3 authors:
S. Brusca R. Lanzafame
Università degli Studi di Messina University of Catania
77 PUBLICATIONS 718 CITATIONS 74 PUBLICATIONS 1,613 CITATIONS
Michele Messina
University of Catania
67 PUBLICATIONS 1,598 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
An Insight on the Rotational Augmentation Effects on HAWTs by means of CFD Simulations View project
All content following this page was uploaded by S. Brusca on 28 October 2014.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Abstract This work analyses the link between the aspect a Angle of attack ()
ratio of a vertical-axis straight-bladed (H-Rotor) wind turbine L Lift (N)
and its performance (power coefficient). The aspect ratio of D Drag (N)
this particular wind turbine is defined as the ratio between R* Resultant force (N)
blade length and rotor radius. Since the aspect ratio variations # Blade angular position ()
of a vertical-axis wind turbine cause Reynolds number varia- P Power (W)
tions, any changes in the power coefficient can also be studied Nb Number of blades (–)
to derive how aspect ratio variations affect turbine perfor- n Rotor rotational velocity (rpm)
mance. Using a calculation code based on the Multiple Stream Re Reynolds number (–)
Tube Model, symmetrical straight-bladed wind turbine per- q Air density (kg/m3)
formance was evaluated as aspect ratio varied. This numerical m Kinematic air viscosity (m2/s)
analysis highlighted how turbine performance is strongly cp Power coefficient (–)
influenced by the Reynolds number of the rotor blade. From a k Tip speed ratio (–)
geometrical point of view, as aspect ratio falls, the Reynolds r Rotor solidity (–)
number rises which improves wind turbine performance. rcpmax r that maximizes cp (–)
kcpmax k that maximizes cp (–)
Keywords VAWT MSTM H-Rotor Reynolds cpmax Maximum cp (–)
number Aspect ratio c Airfoil chord (m)
CL Lift coefficient (–)
Nomenclature CD Drag coefficient (–)
a Interference factor (–)
V0 Free stream wind speed (m/s) Abbreviations
R Rotor radius (m) NACA National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics
x Rotor angular velocity (s-1) VAWT Vertical-axis wind turbine
h Blade length (m) H-Rotor VAWT with straight blades
w Relative airfoil wind speed (m/s) TSR Tip speed ratio
MSTM Multiple Stream Tube Model
AR Aspect ratio
S. Brusca
Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemical and Industrial
Engineering, University of Messina, Contrada Di Dio,
98166 Messina, Italy Highlights
123
129 Page 2 of 8 Int J Energy Environ Eng (2014) 5:129
• How Reynolds number is linked to rotor aspect ratio chosen empirically on the basis of the experience of the
has been investigated; designer, and not on scientific considerations.
• A new design procedure governing the rotor’s aspect In this work, the link between the aspect ratio of a wind
ratio has been presented; turbine and its performance has been studied, and a cor-
• The new design procedure maximizes wind turbine relation between the aspect ratio and the turbine’s perfor-
efficiency. mance has been found.
There are two types of wind turbine which produce Designing a vertical-axis wind turbine with straight
electrical energy from the wind: they are horizontal-axis blades requires plotting power coefficient c p against
wind turbines (HAWTs) and vertical-axis wind turbines tip speed ratio k, as a function of rotor solidity r
(VAWTs). The second, and in particular straight-bladed (Fig. 1).
VAWTs, have a simplified geometry with no yaw Figure 1 shows the behaviour of the power coefficient
mechanism or pitch regulation, and have neither twisted for a wind turbine with straight blades and a NACA 0018
nor tapered blades [1]. VAWTs may be utilized to airfoil.
generate electricity and pump water, as well as in many Figure 1 curves were obtained using a calculation code
other applications [1]. Furthermore, they can handle the based on MSTM theory [23].
wind from any direction regardless of orientation and From the graph in Fig. 1, the solidity which maximizes
are inexpensive and quiet [2]. Wind turbines have power coefficient r = 0.3 can be identified, which has a
aroused the interest of both industry and the academic cpmax = 0.51 corresponding to k = 3.0.
community [3–15, 29–31], which have developed dif- Since solidity r equals:
ferent numerical codes for designing and evaluating Nb c
wind rotor performance. Recent studies [16–20] have r¼ : ð1Þ
R
highlighted that VAWTs can achieve significant
improvements in efficiency. chord c can be expressed as a function of solidity, rotor
VAWT can work even when the wind is very unstable radius and blade number Nb, as per Eq. 2:
making them suitable for urban and small-scale applica- rcpmax
c¼ R ð2Þ
tions [21]. Their particular axial symmetry means they can Nb
obtain energy where there is high turbulence.
The power of a wind turbine with a vertical axis can be
Their optimum operating conditions (maximum power
expressed as per Eq. 3:
coefficient) depend on rotor solidity and tip speed ratio
[22]. For a VAWT rotor solidity depends on the number of 1
P ¼ q V0 3 2 R h c p ð3Þ
blades, airfoil chord and rotor radius. Tip speed ratio is a 2
function of angular velocity, undisturbed wind speed and Having defined the turbine’s aspect ratio (AR) as the
rotor radius. ratio between blade height and rotor radius (AR = h/R),
In the design process of a vertical-axis wind turbine rotor radius can be derived from Eq. 3:
it is crucial to maximize the aerodynamic performance
[22, 26]. The aim is to maximize the annual energy
production by optimizing the curve of the power
coefficient varying with the tip speed ratio [25]. For a
fixed cross-sectional area of the turbine, to optimize the
curve of the power coefficient it is possible to use
different airfoil sections and/or rotors with different
solidity [26].
To maximize energy extraction, other authors intro-
duced guide vanes [27] and/or blade with a variable pitch
angle [28] in vertical-axis wind turbines.
In the design process of a vertical-axis wind turbine, a
wrong choice of the aspect ratio of the wind turbine may
cause a low value of the power coefficient (wind turbine Fig. 1 Power coefficient for a VAWT, straight blades and symmetric
efficiency). This parameter (the aspect ratio) is often airfoil
123
Int J Energy Environ Eng (2014) 5:129 Page 3 of 8 129
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
P advantage of having a mean Reynolds number independent
R¼ ð4Þ of the angle # of rotation (see Fig. 2).
q V0 3 AR cp
To conclude the design cycle, simply calculate xR
(in Eq. 4 power P and wind velocity V0 are design data directly from TSR relative to cpmax identifiable in Fig. 1,
and q is air volume mass). x R ¼ kcpmax V0 ð6Þ
This design approach is iterative and from time to time it
will be necessary to re-evaluate the blade’s Reynolds and combining Eqs. 5 and 6:
number and if necessary repeat the procedure with new c V0 kcpmax
Re ¼ ð7Þ
power coefficient curves. m
The local Reynolds number is:
If the Reynolds number thus calculated is different to
cw the one for the power coefficient curve adopted initially
Re ¼ ð5Þ
m (Fig. 1), a new power coefficient curve should be plotted
where c is the chord from Eq. 2, m is the kinematic air for a different Reynolds number (second attempt). Usually,
viscosity, and w is the air speed relative to the airfoil as the iterative design process needs only 2 or 3 iterations.
Fig. 2 shows. Figure 3 shows the power coefficient curves for the
Adopting a mathematical approximation, to evaluate the wind turbine with the NACA 0018 airfoil, at high Reynolds
Reynolds number, w can be substituted by xR with the numbers.
123
129 Page 4 of 8 Int J Energy Environ Eng (2014) 5:129
123
Int J Energy Environ Eng (2014) 5:129 Page 5 of 8 129
(a) (b)
Fig. 6 How aspect ratio influences Reynolds number and rotational velocity, for different design powers
Fig. 7 a Lift coefficient for NACA 0018. b Drag coefficient for NACA 0018
Figure 5 shows two vertical-axis turbines with identical to notice that the lower the AR, the higher the Reynolds
design power, blade number and aerodynamic profile (NACA number; this can improve wind turbine performance. In the
0018) but with two different aspect ratios (AR1 = 2; design procedure, a choice of a low value for the AR is
AR2 = 0.4). As stated above, the turbine with the lowest AR therefore suitable. In this case study, a comparison between
will have the highest power coefficient and the lowest rotational two wind rotors, designed with two different AR values
velocity. This turbine will display two further advantages: (AR = 2 and AR = 0.4), will be presented.
firstly, a structural one (thicker blades are more stress resistant) Suppose, for simplicity, we want to design a VAWT
and secondly, in-service stability (greater rotor inertia). with a rated power of 1 kW, with only two straight blades
Figure 6 shows the same graphs as Fig. 4 but parame- with symmetrical aerodynamic profile (NACA 0018), and
terized for design power variation. Note how the turbines that the installation site is characterized from a mean
with the highest power have higher Reynolds numbers and wind speed of 10 m/s. The design procedure is showed in
lower rotational velocity. the Fig. 8. In this figure a flowchart for designing the
To conclude, VAWT performance is directly related to the wind turbine is adopted. In this design procedure, first of
blade’s Reynolds number. The higher this is, the better the all, a Reynolds number must be supposed. This Reynolds
turbine’s performance. This is because as the Reynolds number number will be called: ‘‘the first attempt Reynolds num-
increases, the blade’s lift coefficient [24] rises and the drag ber’’. Supposed a first attempt Reynolds number equal to
coefficients decrease (Fig. 7a, b) thus providing greater torque. 5 9 106, from the graph in Fig. 3a it is possible to read
the highest performance (cpmax = 0.51) in correspondence
of a particular rotor solidity and tip speed ratio:
Application for a case study rcpmax = 0.3 e kcpmax = 3.0. For an aspect ratio of 2 (h/
R = 2) (square VAWT cross section), Eq. 4 will provide
To better explain the design procedure investigated in this the rotor radius R = 0.904 m (q = 1.2 kg/m3). From
work, a case study is presented. From Fig. 4, it is possible Eq. 2, we obtain a chord c = 0.136 m, and from Eq. 8 we
123
129 Page 6 of 8 Int J Energy Environ Eng (2014) 5:129
Power (kW) – 1 1
i=0 Airfoil – NACA 0018 NACA 0018
Wind speed (m/s) – 10 10
3
Air density (kg/m ) – 1.2 1.2
Re=Re[i]=5*106 Kinematic air – 1.46 9 10-5 1.46 9 10-5
viscosity (m2/s)
Rotor aspect ratio – 2 2
From diagrams. (h/R)
Input: Re
Output: cpmax; λcpmax; σcpmax.
Number of blades – 2 2
(Nb)
First attempt – 5 9 106 2.8 9 105
i=i+1
Reynolds
cpmax; rcpmax; Fig. 3 0.51; 0.3; 3.0 0.464; 0.4; 2.96
R=[P/(ρV03ARcp)]0.5
kcpmax (Fig. 3a) (Fig. 3c)
Rotor radius (m) Eq. 3 0.904 0.947
Airfoil Chord (m) Eq. 4 0.136 0.189
c=σR/Nb Rotational speed Eq. 6 317 299
(rpm)
Second attempt Eq. 7 2.8 9 105 3.8 9 105
Re[i+1]=cV0λ/ν Reynolds
Re=Re[i+1] Next step – Go to the 2 END
attempt
NO Re[i+1]- Re[i]< ε
YES
Table 2 VAWT––straight blade’s design procedure (h/R = 0.4)
Reference 1st attempt 2nd attempt
123
Int J Energy Environ Eng (2014) 5:129 Page 7 of 8 129
123
129 Page 8 of 8 Int J Energy Environ Eng (2014) 5:129
30. Morshed, K., Rahman, M., Molina, G., Ahmed, M.: Wind tunnel 31. Liu, S., Janajreh, I.: Development and application of an improved
testing and numerical simulation on aerodynamic performance of blade element momentum method model on horizontal axis wind
a three-bladed Savonius wind turbine. Int. J. Energy Environ. turbines. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 3, 30 (2012)
Eng. 4, 18 (2013)
123