See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/274432752

Sociocultural theory and second language pedagogy

Article  in  Language Teaching Research · June 2013

DOI: 10.1177/1362168813482933

CITATIONS READS

37 4,848

2 authors:

Rémi Van Compernolle Lawrence Williams

Carnegie Mellon University University of North Texas
85 PUBLICATIONS   1,198 CITATIONS    33 PUBLICATIONS   436 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Rémi Van Compernolle on 17 April 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

482933
2013
LTR17310.1177/1362168813482933Language Teaching ResearchEditorial

LANGUAGE
TEACHING
Editorial RESEARCH

Language Teaching Research

Sociocultural theory and 17(3) 277­–281

© The Author(s) 2013
Reprints and permissions:
second language pedagogy sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1362168813482933
ltr.sagepub.com

Rémi A van Compernolle

Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Lawrence Williams
University of North Texas, USA

I Introduction
Vygotskian sociocultural theory of mind (SCT) has attracted the attention of second
language (L2) researchers and educators since the publication of the papers of Frawley
and Lantolf (Frawley & Lantolf, 1985; Lantolf & Frawley, 1984). Since that time,
SCT-informed research has become an established part of the landscape of L2 acqui-
sition (SLA), pedagogy, and assessment (Lantolf & Thorne, 2006), as evidenced by
the growing number of journal articles and book chapters, dissertations, edited vol-
umes, and books focused on SCT, as well as the presence of SCT in handbooks and
other reference texts centered on theories of SLA (see Center for Language Acquisition,
2012). The majority of this research has, however, used SCT as a theoretical lens
through which to interpret questions related to SLA rather than as a theoretical moti-
vation for designing L2 pedagogies. In fact, as pointed out by Lantolf (2008), it was
not until Negueruela’s (2003) doctoral research that Vygotsky’s proposals were sys-
tematically incorporated into a coherent L2 pedagogical program. Since then, a num-
ber of studies (including several doctoral theses) have been conducted to explore the
impact of SCT-informed pedagogies on adult SLA (e.g. papers in Lantolf & Poehner,
2008). This research has included, centrally, work on dynamic assessment and con-
cept-based instruction, but also perspectives on other forms of social, or human,
mediation intentionally introduced into L2 educational contexts in order to promote
development.
The importance of pedagogical activity for SCT cannot be understated. Indeed, one
has to acknowledge that Vygotsky did not conceive of pedagogies derived from his pro-
posals to be mere applications of the theory; that is, the application of theoretically
informed teaching ‘techniques’. Instead, pedagogical intervention was itself part and
parcel of further developing the theory and of continuing to understand not only the
nature of human cognition but, crucially, the processes by which the mind develops (e.g.
Vygotsky, 1997). This is what Vygotsky referred to as ‘praxis’; the unification of theory
and practical activity. As Lantolf and Poehner (2011) explain:

Downloaded from ltr.sagepub.com by guest on March 10, 2016

278 Language Teaching Research 17(3)

Vygotsky’s scientific enterprise was concerned with much more than a description of human
psychology because the kind of understanding he sought was one that illuminated the processes
of the mind’s development, specifically the social and cultural means through which individuals
come to master thought. For Vygotsky this orientation held direct and immediate implications
for intervention in development, that is, for engineering activities to support development
[italics added]. The position he argued for was the integration of theory with practice, a ‘praxis’
whereby theory provides a basis to guide practical activity, but at the same time practice informs
and shapes theory. (p. 12)

Lantolf and Poehner’s (2011) comment regarding Vygotsky’s commitment to praxis

sharply contrasts with most theories of SLA; specifically regarding the relationship
between ‘basic’ and ‘applied’ research (i.e. SLA theory and language teaching). As
Lantolf (2010) has commented, non-SCT L2 researchers often presume that applications
of SLA theories (basic research) to teaching (applied research) may not be fruitful until
SLA processes are much better understood. From the perspective of SCT, however, this
is a non-issue. On the one hand, so-called ‘applied’ research is indeed ‘basic’ research
and, on the other, it is through intervention (i.e. pedagogy) that developmental processes
can be observed and understood. In short, as Vygotsky argued throughout his writings, in
order to understand the processes of human mental development, we must intervene. In
formal, structured educational environments, this entails designing pedagogical pro-
grams that create the conditions under which developmental processes may be set in
motion and observed.
The articles included in this special issue explore various aspects of Vygotsky’s theory
as they inform L2 pedagogy in a variety of educational contexts (e.g. the classroom,
tutoring sessions, computer-mediated environments) and languages, including French,
English, and Spanish. Each contribution includes a discussion of the specific theoretical
construct (or constructs) addressed in the research, as well as an exploration of the impli-
cations of the findings for L2 teaching. Before continuing to a more detailed description
of each contribution, we would like to sketch out briefly what we consider to fall under
the rubric of ‘pedagogy’ from the perspective of SCT.

II  Pedagogy from an SCT perspective

One of the most common, though relatively narrow, understandings of pedagogy in both
SCT and non-SCT educational research involves direct interventions from a physically
present teacher. This includes, for example, teacher-fronted lessons in which relevant
content matter, concepts, and skills are explicitly taught to students (e.g. lecture-recita-
tion, dialogic teaching, instructional conversations) as well as other participation frame-
works in which a teacher may guide individual or small groups of learners who are
engaged in a task. Indeed, these examples are likely the most basic prototypes of what
counts as teaching, especially in formal, structured educational contexts, such as
classrooms.
An expanded view of pedagogy accounts for the broader organization of educational
activity. This includes the design and development of tasks and pedagogical materials as
well as the relationship between L2 instruction, assessment, and other educational objec-
tives. In the L2 field, task-based language teaching, project-based instruction, immersion

Downloaded from ltr.sagepub.com by guest on March 10, 2016

Editorial 279

education, content and language integrated curricula, integrated performance assess-

ment, and technology-enhanced language teaching are but a few examples. We would
also include institutional policies and socio-political factors surrounding educational
activity in this expanded view of pedagogy, as they directly and indirectly impact upon
what happens, and is allowed to happen, in educational settings. Pedagogy – or educa-
tion, more generally speaking – is, after all, a multifaceted form of organized cultural
activity that operates at multiple levels. In our view, an expanded definition of pedagogy
articulates with the goals of SCT-based educational praxis. As we outline below, the
crucial concept to keep in mind is mediation.
The central tenet of SCT is that human mind is mediated (Wertsch, 2007); that is,
higher psychological functions integrate auxiliary stimuli, or mediational means, which
reorganize natural, or biologically endowed, processes. This has significant consequences
for how L2 pedagogy is conceptualized and carried out in the real world (Lantolf &
Thorne, 2006). Following Kozulin (2003), we would like to distinguish between two
broad categories of mediation. First, and in line with Vygotsky’s (1978) original concep-
tion of mediation, is what Kozulin refers to as ‘psychological tools’, the culturally con-
structed artifacts that are integrated into human mental functioning. Examples of
psychological mediators include sign systems (e.g. language), cultural concepts and
schema, numeracy, literacy, and so on. Second, Kozulin notes the importance that
Vygotsky ascribed to developmentally appropriate assistance from other people, or
‘human mediation’, that supports an individual’s internalization of psychological tools.
For instance, an L2 teacher may provide feedback during a task that is attuned to a learn-
er’s, or a group’s, developmental needs, or zone of proximal development (ZPD), which
supports the learner’s, or the group’s, control over an L2 feature, skill, or concept.
From the perspective of SCT, then, L2 pedagogy encompasses any form of educa-
tional activity designed to promote the internalization of, and control over, the language
that learners are studying, whether or not a human mediator (e.g. a teacher) is physically
present and overtly teaching, as in a teacher-fronted classroom or a tutoring session.
Human mediators may, after all, be vicariously present through the pedagogical materi-
als, tasks, and technologies used by learners. To recall our earlier assertion, pedagogy is
about creating the conditions for, and supporting, development (i.e. the internalization of
psychological tools), and while this often involves a physically present human mediator,
not all aspects of pedagogical activity require this. Other forms of mediation can cer-
tainly be intentionally introduced for pedagogical purposes. For instance, teachers may
design tasks in which learners collaborate among themselves to accomplish specific
learning objectives, or learners may interact with computer-based or internet-based
applications that mediate their development. Such examples certainly fall under the
rubric of pedagogy in our view.

III  Overview of the contributions

This special issue includes five articles reporting on original empirical research in the
domain of L2 pedagogy from the perspective of SCT. The contributions address a variety
of languages, L2 learning contexts, and theoretical and practical issues related to SCT
informed pedagogies.

Downloaded from ltr.sagepub.com by guest on March 10, 2016

280 Language Teaching Research 17(3)

Rémi A van Compernolle and Celeste Kinginger report on a novel approach to using
appropriateness questionnaire tasks to assess L2 metapragmatic capacities while simul-
taneously promoting their development: engaging learners in cooperative interaction as
they complete the task (i.e. dynamic assessment). The study draws on data collected
during a concept-based pedagogical program in which learners of French were appropri-
ating the concepts of social distance and power hierarchies as illustrated by the second-
person pronouns tu and vous ‘you’. The authors present a case study of one learner,
Nikki, to show how support provided by the teacher/mediator around one questionnaire
item both assessed and promoted her developing conceptual knowledge about the
dynamics of interpersonal relationships and how these are indexed through language.
Kristin J Davin’s article reports on an elementary school Spanish teacher’s use of
dynamic assessment in which mediating prompts were planned in advance to address
anticipated problems with WH-question formation, and her ability to engage students
in more flexible instructional conversations to support their learning when other
issues arose in the course of classroom interaction. As Davin points out, while
dynamic assessment has an explicit evaluation goal (i.e. to assess while simultane-
ously supporting learner growth), instructional conversation is more concerned with
teaching without an assessment in mind. Her analysis reveals how these two forms of
interaction can be integrated into classroom pedagogy for different purposes and in a
complementary way.
Matthew E Poehner and James P Lantolf present the results of an initial attempt at
designing computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA) tests, focusing on reading and lis-
tening comprehension in L2 Chinese and French. The tests, which incorporate mediation
to support learners as they respond to questions, include transfer items to determine the
extent to which learner development is supported during the test. This process generates
three scores: actual score (to capture unmediated performance), mediated score (reflect-
ing responsiveness to assistance provided on each test item), and a learning potential
score (based on gain between actual and mediated performance) that indicates how much
investment in future instructional activity is likely required for development to move
forward.
Rémi A van Compernolle explores the appropriation of pragmatic concepts and the
emergence of sociostylistic variation in L2 French. The article focuses on the co-devel-
opment of conceptual knowledge and one type of sociostylistic variation in French; the
variable presence versus absence of the proclitic negative particle ne of verbal negation.
The analysis centers on learners’ orientations to scenarios to be performed as spoken-
interactive tasks, including reasons for choosing different negative structures, their use
of negative structures in actual performance, and the emergence of mediated and inde-
pendent performance abilities.
Lawrence Williams, Lee B Abraham, and Eduardo Negueruela-Azarola extend
research on concept-based instruction to the domain of teacher education. The authors
investigate the implementation of this approach to pedagogy in the foreign language
classroom from the perspectives of pre-service, novice, and experienced teachers of
French and Spanish, with specific focus on the concept of verbal aspect. The overarching
goal of the study is to understand how, why, and to what extent teachers embrace or reject
a pedagogical approach that does not necessarily align with a textbook’s explanation of
grammatical features.

Downloaded from ltr.sagepub.com by guest on March 10, 2016

Editorial 281

Acknowledgements
We believe that the articles included in this special issue constitute an important contribution to
language teaching research in general and to Vygotskian approaches to L2 pedagogy in particular,
and we would like to acknowledge the collaborative nature of the project. First and foremost, we
are of course grateful to all of the authors for their contributions, and for their dedication to this
special issue. Second, we would also like to thank the Language Teaching Research editors, Gary
Barkhuizen and Rod Ellis, for their support of the publication of this collection of articles. Last, but
certainly not least, we extend our warmest appreciation to the panel of reviewers who have helped
to strengthen this issue: Rumia Ableeva, Marta Antón, Jean-Marc Dewaele, Kate Douglass,
Kathleen Farrell Whitworth, Richard Forest, Kylie Hsu, Noriko Ishihara, Alex Kozulin, Amy
Ohta, Jonathon Reinhardt, Kelly Sax, and Robert Summers.

References
Center for Language Acquisition. (2012). Sociocultural theory: A select bibliography of resources
with reference to studies, descriptions, and essays. University Park: The Pennsylvania State
University. Retrieved from: http://language.la.psu.edu/Sociocultural_Theory_Biblio.pdf (March
2013).
Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J.P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskian perspective.
Applied Linguistics, 6, 19–44.
Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological tools and mediated learning. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis,
V.S. Ageyev, & S.M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural contexts
(pp. 15–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lantolf, J.P. (2008). Praxis and classroom L2 development. Estudios de lingüística inglesia apli-
cada, 8, 13–44.
Lantolf, J.P. (2010). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative. In R.B. Kaplan (Ed.),
The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 163–177). 2nd ed. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Lantolf, J.P., & Frawley, W. (1984). Second language performance and Vygotskyan psycholin-
guistics: Implications for L2 instruction. In A. Manning, P. Martin & K. McCalla (Eds.), The
tenth LACUS forum 1983 (pp. 425–440). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.
Lantolf, J.P., & Poehner, M.E. (Eds.). (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second
languages. London: Equinox.
Lantolf, J.P., & Poehner, M.E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis
for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15, 11–33.
Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language
development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Negueruela, E. (2003). A sociocultural approach to teaching and researching second language:
Systemic-theoretical instruction and second language development. Unpublished PhD thesis,
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1997). Educational psychology. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
Wertsch, J. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge
companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloaded from ltr.sagepub.com by guest on March 10, 2016

View publication stats