Internship Report

INTERNSHIP REPORT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT

OF REQUIREMENTS OF BA LLB (HONS) DEGREE

SUBMITTED BY:

MOHIT SINGH

ENROLLMENT NUMBER

35925503817

MONTH YEAR

16.03.2022 to 31.03.2022

SEMESTER

JIMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL CAMPUS

(Affiliated to GGSIPU & Approved by Bar Council of India, Delhi)
GREATER NOIDA, GAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR,
UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA

1
 Internship Report

LIST OF CONTENT

S. NO. TITLE PAGE NO.

1. Acknowledgment 3

2. Undertaking Regarding 4
authenticity by the student

3. Objective of their Internship 5

4. Weekly report (15 days report) of 6-13

Internship that shall include the
Court/ assignments attended to;

2
 Internship Report

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I would like to extend my sincere thanks to Mr. Vikas

Khatri, Advocate on record for giving me the
opportunity to intern with him for a period
commencing from 16.03.2022 to 31.03.2022. He has been
an encouraging mentor and has guided me throughout
this journey and supported me in all my endeavors.

I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge

Dr. Pallavi Gupta, HOD JIMS School of Law, Greater
Noida, for allowing me to intern under him.

MOHIT SINGH
BA.LLB JIMS School of Law
E-mail: mohitsplash.singh594@gmail.com

3
 Internship Report

UNDERTAKING

I Mohit Singh s/o Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh r/o 2347

Hudson Lane, GTB Nagar, New Delhi-110009 do hereby
solemnly affirm:

1.That each and every content of this report is

drafted by me.
2.That all the documents I have submitted to
support the authenticity my internship report are
true and as per my knowledge.
3.That I have not committed any sought of
plagiarism, misrepresentation, or any faking of
the report and everything I have done with my
honesty and sincerity.

4
 Internship Report

OBJECTIVE OF INTERNSHIP

1.To appreciate the practical aspects and social

dimensions of legal problems.

2.To grab the opportunity to see how law operates in

practical life.

3.To improve any own legal knowledge and to widen the

horizon of my own view of law as a profession.

4.To have an exposure to the law in operation in

contexts where I will come to perceive aspects of
law which cannot be learned from reading or hearing
about it.

5
 Internship Report

WEEK 1: 16Th March-23rd March 2022

Dated: 16.03.2022

IN THE COURT OF SH.BHUKESH KUMAR, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT

JUDGE WEST TIS HAZARI COURT

COURT NO.35

SC NO.: 501/2018

IN THE MATTER OF:

STATE

VERSUS

SANDEEP

FIR NO. 0021/2018

U/S:376/323/506 IPC
Police station: Punjabi Bagh
DATE OF HEARING: 9/8/19

FACTS:
Our Client Mr. Sandeep who runs a café at 4th floor
Building no. 6, Central Market, Punjabi Bagh-110026
residence of Rohtak, Haryana was allegedly involved
in a rape case where a married women claimed that our
client on the pretext on marrying her indulged in
sexual activity and after having intercourse our
client allegedly filmed her and later blackmailed
her. These were the allegations imposed on our
client.

Matter was with the Punjabi bagh police station and

according to charge sheet this course of event

6
 Internship Report

happened on 15.03.2017 at ‘The Rock’ café central

market, Punjabi Bagh, Delhi.

SECTIONS INVOLVED:
Section 323, 376(2) and 506 Indian Penal Code

OBSERVATION:
 Judge enquired accused his full name, father’s
name, from where he belong, what he does for
living, how much time he had spent in Delhi. In
all the places where address was to be given,
accused gave his Delhi address not his permanent
address of Haryana so judge threatened him to put
into custody.
 Judge then framed the issue with public
prosecutor according to which our client raped
the victim on 15.03.2017 at ‘The Rock’ café
central market, Punjabi Bagh, Delhi time unknown
on the pretext of false promise of marriage.
 Next issue was imposed according to which accused
filmed the video and later blackmailed the victim
with intent to force her into sexual position.
 So accordingly to those issues section 376(2) and
506 of IPC were imposed on him
 Issues were shown to our client and next date of
hearing was given.
 Our council pleaded for the summon of
Investigation officer to which judge agreed

Next Day Of Hearing: 19.04.2022

7
 Internship Report

WEEK 1: 16Th March-23rd March 2022

Dated: 21.03.2022

IN THE COURT OF MS. HELLY FUR KAUR,SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CUM RC,

COURT NO. 231 CENTERAL TIS HAZARI COURT

CASE NO.: 21/2019

IN THE MATTER OF:

RAKESH KUMAR GOEL … Defendant

VERSUS

ANOOP GOEL … Plaintiff

FACTS:
Issues were framed on 15.02.2021 and first argument
date was given on 13.07.2021 in which the defendant
council didn’t appear to which today date was given.
The plaintiff filed suit for partition possession and
permanent injunction.

SECTIONS INVOLVED:
Order 6 Rule 17 R/w Section 151 CrPC.

OBSERVATION:
 The other council wanted some amendments in their
written statement in paragraph 3,4,6 and 20.
 To which our council raise an objection as our
council felt that those amendments weren’t
relevant to the case.

8
 Internship Report

 As one of the amendment was the area of the plot

which happens to be 300 square yards but the
defendant council wrote it 310 square yards as
said it was typing error and many more pecuniary
amendments like this.
 However, MS. Helly Fur Kaur, Senior Civil Judge
cum RC allowed those amendments and gave our
council next day of hearing.
 After hearing sir explained what is Order 6 Rule
17 R/w Section 151 CrPc which says Provision for
Amendment of pleadings has been stated in Order 6
Rule 17 of the Code of civil procedure. But the
court will allow amendment only if this amendment
is necessary to determine the controversy between
the parties. The purpose of this provision is to
promote ends of justice and not to defeat the
law.

NEXT DATE OF HEARING: 21/4/2022

9
 Internship Report

WEEK 2: 24Th March-31ST March 2022

Dated: 26.03.2022
IN THE COURT OF RISHIKA SHRIVASTA, CIVIL JUDGE-03
DISTT. WEST, TIS HAZARI COURT, DELHI

Complaint Case No. ......... of 2022

COURT NO.-181

MEMO OF PARTIES

IN THE MATTER OF:

Nand Lal Pandey .... Plaintiff

Versus

Manoj Kumar .... Defendant

FACTS:
In 2020, our client, Manoj Kumar received a notice
from the Nand Lal Pandey claiming an amount of
Rs.50,000/- to which our client denied as he had
already settled the due amount. Later Nand Lal Pandey
filed recovery suit against Manoj Kumar. However,
later in first wave of covid-19 the defendant
tragically died but case was still being continued.
Since the Plaintiff did not have any legal
representatives and because of the Delhi High Court
order that “no adverse order shall be passed by its
subordinate courts in non-urgent/routine matters
where the advocate concerned or a litigant is unable
to join proceedings through video conferencing mode,
the case was still proceeding.”

10
 Internship Report

OBSERVATION:
Our counsel argued that the late Nand Lal Pandey does
not have legal representatives and requested the
judge to abate the case.

The judge gave the plaintiff time till 4:00 to appear

in the court or the case will be abated.

Abatement of suit Abatement refers to a situation in

which when any of the party in a civil suit dies and
if their right to sue survives then the suit can be
continued by the legal representative or legal heirs
of the deceased party. But if in a situation or a
case where the right to sue does not survive then the
suit will automatically come to an end. The
fundamental part of an important part which the
effects the abatement is the right to sue after the
death of either party because after the death of the
party if the right to sue survives then the suit can
be continued. The general rule in this is that an
action or suit can be prosecuted by and against only
living parties. If in a situation where the person
against whom a personal action is brought and dies
before suit papers naming that person as the
defendant, then in such a situation the suit papers
can be changed by substituting the deceased’s
personal representative or legal representative. A
deceased party is not eligible to be a party to a
legal proceeding and on the death of either party,
its effect is to suspend the action as to the
decedent until his or her legal represented is
substituted.as a party.

11
 Internship Report

WEEK 2: 24Th March-31ST March 2022

Dated: 30.03.2022
IN THE COURT OF SH. VINAY SINGHAL (ELECTRICITY),
ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE CENTRAL TIS HAZARI COURT

COURT NO.324

SC NO. 27484/16

IN THE MATTER OF:

STATE

VERSUS

JAGPREET SINGH (BSES CASE)

FIR NO. 872/15

U/S: 135 IER

Police station: Tilak Nagar

DATE OF HEARING: 30/03/2022

FACTS:
Our client, Jagpreet Singh had allegedly stolen
electricity units worth around Rs. 1,50,000/- from
BSES. After joint request from both the parties, they
were referred to Mediation Centre, THC, Delhi, a sum
of Rs. 63,623/- was agreed upon mutually by both the
parties.

SECTIONS INVOLVED:
Sections 135 of The Indian Electricity Rules, 1956

12
 Internship Report

OBSERVATIONS:
Our client pleaded guilty and agreed to pay the sum
i.e. Rs. 63,623/- by DD/ Pay Order, absolving him of
his civil liability and as for his criminal
liability, the judge sentenced him to remain till the
court sets.

Jagpeet Singh had to remain in the court room till 4

PM or till the court remains in session after which
he is absolved of all civil and criminal liabilities
that were charged against him and the same case is
closed.
Later sir briefly explained us Section 135:
Section 135: Supply and use of energy by non-
licensees and others— Where any person other than a
non-licensee is supplied with energy by a non-
licensee or other person or has his premises for the
time being connected to the conductors or plant of a
non-licensee or other person, or himself generates
energy and uses such energy or part thereof, such
person shall be deemed to be a consumer for the
purposes of rules 9, 10, 29 to 33 (inclusive), 45 to
70 (inclusive), 87 and 142 and non-licensee or other
person shall be subject to all the liabilities
imposed on a licensee by these rules.

13