Logical fallacies can often be used to mislead people – to trick them into believing something they otherwise wouldn't. CATEGORIES 1. Fallacies of Relevance offer reasons to believe a claim or conclusion that, on examination, turn out to not in fact be reasons to do any such thing. A. Appeal to Force (Argumentum Ad Baculum) is when someone in a position of power threatens to bring down unfortunate consequences upon anyone who dares to disagree with a proffered proposition. Although it is rarely developed so explicitly, a fallacy of this type might propose: I believe that Ferdinand E. Marcos was the greatest President of the Philippines. Therefore, Ferdinand E. Marcos was the greatest President of the Philippines. If you do not agree with my political opinions, you will receive a grade of F for this course. B. Personal Attack (Argumentum Ad Hominem) are arguments toward the man & is also called "Poisoning the Well Attacking or praising the people who make an argument, rather than discussing the argument itself. This practice is fallacious because the personal character of an individual is logically irrelevant to the truth or falseness of the argument itself. The statement "2+2=4" is true regardless if it is stated by criminals, congressmen, or pastors. C. Appeal to Pity (Argumentum Ad Misericordiam) it tries to win acceptance by pointing out the unfortunate consequences that will otherwise fall upon the speaker and others, for whom we would then feel sorry. I am a single parent, solely responsible for the financial support of my children. If you give me this traffic ticket, I will lose my license and be unable to drive to work. If I cannot work, my children and I will become homeless and may starve to death. Therefore, you should not give me this traffic ticket. Again, the conclusion may be false (that is, perhaps I should be given the ticket) even if the premises are all true, so the argument is fallacious. D. Argumentum Ad Populum “appeal to the people" is a fallacious argument which is based on claiming a truth or affirming something is good because the majority thinks so. A lot of church leaders allow the use of jeans in their churches therefore it is ok to wear jeans when going to church. E. Appeal to False Authority (Argumentum Ad Verecundiam) the opinion of someone famous or accomplished in another area of expertise is supposed to guarantee the truth of a conclusion. Researcher Linus Pauling winner of two unshared Nobel prizes, one for chemistry, another for peace, stated his daily use of Vitamin C delayed the onset of his cancer by twenty years. F. Appeal to Tradition (Argumentum Ad Traditionem; Argumentum Ad Antiquitatem) This line of thought asserts that a premise must be true because people have always believed it or done it. I came from a family of teachers therefore I must pursue teaching as well.