Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group Members:
Bishundat, Alvin
Estupinan, Alexander
Jean-Louis, Justanley
Kokoszka, Kamila
Mejia, Anthony
April 2, 2022
1
TABLE OF CONTENT
INTRODUCTION 3
PROCEDURE 4
DATA 4-6
2
INTRODUCTION
In this experiment were are going to test and evaluate the bonding properties of an
ionic hydrates and and the empirical formula of chemical compound identitied as BaCI₂
(Barium chloride). An Ionic compound is a when an inion and cataion element combine. A
hydrate is a compound that takes water molecules from its environment and incorporates
them into its structure. The water molecules can remain intact inside the compound or broken
down partially into their different components. Hydrates are divided into three categories:
inorganic hydrates, organic hydrates, and gas hydrates. Inorganic hydrates are generated
when the compound is being heated. In organic hydrate, the compound reacts chemically
with the water, and gas hydrate is a solid composed of molecules occupying cage-like
structures created by water molecules. The empirical formula of a compound shows the ratio
of elements present in the compound, but not the actual numbers of atoms found in the
molecule. The overall goal of the experiment to determine how many water molecules or
3
PROCEDURE
Materials and Instructions for lab experiments can be found on pages 37 and 38 of the SCC
DATA
Calculating the constat mass loss from the last heating and cooling cycles:
0.1401𝑔
= 1.0022𝑔
𝑥100
= 13.98% of H₂o
4
Mass of anhydrous compound
BaCI₂
= 208.2 g/mol
0.8621 𝑔
208.2 𝑔/𝑚𝑜𝑙
= 0. 0041 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝐵𝑎𝐶𝐼₂
0.0078 𝑔
0.0041 𝑔
= 1.90 g ≈ 2
= BaCI₂ · 2H₂O
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION
During the experiment, it was important to heat the crucible to a constant mass to be
able to get rid of all the water molecules in the compound of BaCI₂ (Barium chloride). As the
crucible gets heated and loses water molecules, it also loses mass. Looking at the table for
part A, the crucible mass was decreasing as the cycle of heating, cooling, and weighting was
repeated for 3 trials. But, in the table for part B, when the crucible was heated and cooled
5
down with the content in it at repeated cycles, the first trial had a mass loss of 0.1401g
compared with its initial mass + sample, in the second trial it had a mass loss of 0.0046g
compared with the first trial, and in the third trial it had a mass loss of -0.0038g compared
with the second trial. Some of the reasons why the mass of water lose were not constant was
because of sources of error, such as the fingerprints of a group member on the crucible which
may have caused more weight, the crucible fell on the wire mat or the table and it opened
multiple times allowing moist to come in, not letting the crucible cool down with the top on it
which would allow moisture to come in also, and not grabbing the crucible correctly with
tongs and allowing the top to open while it was being measured.