Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Energy Valve Case Study at NTU Singapore
Energy Valve Case Study at NTU Singapore
Low Delta-T Syndrome in Although the chilled water plants To overcome degrading cooling
are designed to maintain almost a output, a Belimo Energy Valve™ was
Large Campuses constant delta-T, in reality the installed at an Air Handling Unit
delta-T falls short of the design (AHU) supplying conditioned fresh
A common obstacle to achieving
intent. The result is high pumping air to a 1,000 m2 research facility in
energy efficient cooling at the NTU
energy consumption and decreased the NTU campus. This paper
campus, much like buildings in most
cooling efficiency of the cooling presents the results of measuring
large campuses with central cooling
plant leading facility managers to the effective cooling energy transfer
plants, is the degrading difference
believe that additional cooling by the AHU cooling coil, before and
between supply and return chilled
capacity is required (Hyman L.B., after the installation of the Energy
water temperature, commonly
2004). Valve.
known as ‘low delta-T syndrome’.
Page 1 of 5
Cooling Network campus. The chilled water demand laboratories and offices located
of the SPMS building, along with 2 within the building. For this study,
The ‘Chemistry Block’ of the School surrounding buildings, is provided the roof top unit AHU CR4-1, which
of Physical and Mathematical by a central cooling plant. supplies 100% fresh air to 8
Sciences (SPMS) department, is one Multiple AHUs and FCUs use the laboratories and office spaces, was
of the most air-conditioning chilled water to cool and de- chosen as a test-bed.
intensive buildings in the NTU humidify the air supplied to several
AHU CR4-1
Figure 2: Air handling unit (AHU) schematic of the Chemistry Block at SPMS NTU with the highlighted AHU CR4-1
used for testing
Air Handling Unit demand, the AHU supplies 8 m3/s supplied to the AHU at ~8°C and
(28,800 CMH) of fresh air and has a returned back between 12°C to
performance maximum cooling capacity of 500 18°C.
AHUs typically cool outdoor air kW. Sensors were installed to It was also observed that the
below dew point to control the measure the performance of the increase in chilled water flow rate,
moisture in the air supplied to the AHU, including supply air conditions in response to a higher cooling
building. AHUs must then employ a after the pre-cooling and the heat- demand, resulted in lower chilled
reheat control strategy, to maintain recovery coils. Most of the cooling water return temperatures, i.e.
set point supply air conditions and and the moisture removal is done lower delta-T (Figure 8). As a result
indoor thermal comfort. AHU CR4-1, by the Pre-Cooling Coil whilst the of decreasing delta-T, the cooling
supplies 100% fresh air at a Dry Bulb supply air conditions are controlled output of the pre-cooling coil enters
Temperature and Relative Humidity by the Heat-Recovery Coils. It was the waste zone in which cooling
set point of 22.5°C and 55%. At peak observed that the chilled water was capacity shows diminishing returns.
T
Pre-
Cooling
Coil
T
Temp. Existing Connection
Sensor Energy Valve Previous Connection
Figure 6: Integrated Web-Interface for configuring the Energy Valve and visualizing the current performance
Page 3 of 5 and recorded data
Effect of Flow Limitation on Cooling Output and Supply Air conditions
a)
b)
Figure 8: Heat exchanger performance with a flow limit of a) 25L/s and b) 18L/s, shown as delta-T and power
versus flow
Page 4 of 5
Energy Savings Potential humidity. The result is an increase 6.3 °C. For a given cooling load,
of less than 5% of relative humidity there is a significant improvement
The peak flow was reduced from 25 at the set point temperature of in the chiller efficiency caused by a
L/s to 18 L/s, and the overall 22.5°C. In other words limiting the decrease in the temperature dif-
reduction in average day-time flow flow has a large impact on energy ference between the condenser
from 18.5 to 15.1 L/s (18.4%). The but a very small impact on the room loop and the evaporator loop. Due
reduction in average flow results in comfort according to ASHRAE Stan- to the small fraction of chilled water
a significant reduction of pumping dard 55. consumption by AHU CR4-1, the
energy consumption. However, The reduction in average flow impact on the central plant cannot
since the 3.4 L/s reduction is only a results in an increased average be observed directly.
small fraction of the flow supplied chilled water delta-T because the If the savings of reduced flow and
by the secondary pumps, the overall two parameters are inversely increased delta-T were extrapolated
effect could not be measured. At related in water-to-air heat ex- to the entire chemistry block,
the same time, a 1°C increase in the changers. The minimum chilled annual pumping energy would be
average supply air temperature is water delta-T during daytime reduced by 76,600-90,500 kWh and
observed. Because this coil needs to operating hours increased from 3.3 annual cooling energy by 175,000-
dehumidify, the impact of limiting to 4.5 °C and the average chilled 220,000 kWh with a high efficiency
was considered with respect to water delta-T increased from 5.4 to centrifugal chiller.
Figure 9: Comparison of cooling performance between the baseline case and flow limitation during daytime
operating hours (0800hrs – 1900hrs)
Summary flow and improved the cooling chilled water system operation not
performance of the chilled water only reduces pumping energy
The effect of the Flow Limitation system. The limiting exercise consumption, but the reduced
control strategy using the Energy effectively reduced the maximum chilled water flow also creates
Valve was assessed during this chilled water flow rate of the AHU greater flow capacity for other
study. It is evident that the Energy by 28%, while minimally impacting zones, particularly zones which are
Valve has reduced the excess water comfort. This improvement in far away from the pumps.
Energy Research Institute @ NTU Mr. Bharath Seshadri Dr. Marc Thuillard Belimo Automation AG
Dr. Vincent Partenay
Nanyang Technological University Mr. Stefan Mischler Brunnenbachstraβe 1
Mr. Emmanuel Blonkowski
1 CleanTech Loop, Singapore 637141 Mr. Nilesh Y. Jadhav Mr. Forest Reider 8340 Hinwil, Switzerland
Page 5 of 5