Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name
Institution
Course
Instructor
Date
2
COVID-19 pandemic on our company. Our company has a price elasticity of demand of 1.6.
Hence, it signifies that an increase in price by 1% lowers the quantity demanded of our
services by 1.6%. Consequently, we can assert that Big Time Entertainment’s price elasticity
is relatively elastic. Relating the changes in demand with an increase in price helps to prove
this elasticity. Therefore, raising the cost by 10% will result in a 16% reduction in the
C h ange∈Quantity demanded
1.6= = 1.6 x 10% = 16%
10 %
Since the law of demand states that a price increase reduces the quantity demanded
(Méndez-Carbajo & Asarta, 2017), our services' quantity demanded will fall by 16%. Big
Time Entertainment will pay for the largest share of the cost increase, and the demand
reduction will prompt the company to spend more to sustain its production. A fall in quantity
demanded will reduce our revenue, eventually reducing the company's profits (Samuelson et
al., 2021). I support the post by Musa Aqeel since it applies the same concept to All America
Grocery Inc. According to the post, the company has a price elasticity of 0.2. Therefore, a
10% rise in cost will lead to a 2% fall in the quantity of food demanded in the company.
However, since food is a basic need, Musa claims that people will still purchase groceries
despite the change in prices, which will make them account for the larger cost. Conclusively,
since the change in quantity demanded is adequate to change the price of services at Big
References
Cengage.
Méndez-Carbajo, D., & Asarta, C. J. (2017). Using FRED data to teach price elasticity of
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2017.1320607