Professional Documents
Culture Documents
موقف الإمام أبي الوليد الباجي من دليل الخطاب وأث
موقف الإمام أبي الوليد الباجي من دليل الخطاب وأث
ﺃﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻟﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ :ﺻﺎﱀ ﺑﻮﺑﺸﻴﺶ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﲡﺸﻤﱠﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﻋﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻌ ﱠﻬﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐِﺮﺍﺱ ﻣﻨﺬ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ؛ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ،ﻓﺠﺰﺍﻩ ﺍﷲ ﺧﲑ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻧﻔﻊ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺑﻌﻠﻤﻪ.
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺯﺟـﻲ ﺷﻜﺮﻱ ﺇﻟـﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺗﺬﺓ ﺍﻷﻓﺎﺿﻞ؛ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﻮﺍ ﻟـﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻨـﺼﺢ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﺠﻴﻊ ،ﻭﺃﺧﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ :ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻋﻮﻣﺎﺭ ،ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻛﺎﰲ ،ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ
ﻧﺬﻳﺮ ﻭﻫﺎﺏ ،ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ﺑﻮﻋﺮﻭﺝ ،ﺑﺎﺭﻙ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻤﻬﻢ.
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻮﺗﻨـﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺷﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ
ﺑﺒﺎﺗﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﲑ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻘﺴﻨﻄﻴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻴـﻀﺎﻭﻱ ،ﻭﻏﲑﻫـﻢ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣـﻤﻦ ﻣﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺇﻋﺎﺭﺓ ،ﺃﺩﺍﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺧﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﻫﻠﻪ.
ﻭﺣﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﺈﺧﻮﺍﻧـﻲ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﺒﻠﺪﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻓﻘﺪ
ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﱄ ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻟـﻤُﻌﲔ ،ﺑﺪﻋﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﺸﺠﻴﻌﻬﻢ ،ﺃﺳﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻠﻨـﻲ ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻫﻢ ﳑـﻦ
ﲢﺎﺑﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﷲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻓﺘﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ.
ﺇﻫﺪﺍﺀ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﻤﺪﻩ ﻭﻧﺴﺘﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﻧﺴﺘﻐﻔﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻧﻌﻮﺫ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻭﺭ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﻭﺳﻴ ﺎ
ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻟﻨﺎ ،ﻣﻦ ﻳﻬﺪﻩ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻼ ﻣﻀﻞ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﻀﻠﻞ ﻓﻼ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭ ﺃﺷﻬﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ
ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻻ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺃﺷﻬﺪ ﺃﻥ ﱠﻤﺪﺍ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ؛ ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ:
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﱠﻴﺰ ﺑﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻪ ،ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴﺢ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻣﻦ
ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﺍ ﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﷲ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻘُﺒﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭ ؛ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺭ ﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ،
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺷﻬﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺍ ﻘﻘﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺼ ﺔ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟ ُﺑِﻨﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ؛ ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻬﺮﻫﻢ ﺷﻴ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ " :ﻣﻦ ﺗﺪﱠﺑﺮ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ؛ ﻭﺟﺪ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ
1
ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍ ﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺃﺻ ﱠﺢ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ".
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻭﻋُﺮﻓﻮﺍ ﻮﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻨﻴ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧ ﻢ
ﻟﻪ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ Υﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ؛ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺄﻋﺮ
ﺍ ﺘﻮﺍﺿﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭ ﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ: ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺒﻪ ﺿﻤﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ
ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺃﺛﺮﻩ ﰲ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ
ﺃ ﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ:
ﻜﻦ ﺇ ﺎﻝ ﺃ ﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺎ ﺍ ﺗﻴﺔ:
-ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﱠﺔ ،ﺎ ﺃ ﺮ ﻛﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ... " :ﻭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺃﺻﻞ
2
ﻋ ﻴﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ".
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟ ﻻ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻟﻪ ﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ؛ ﻼ ﺍﻟﺒ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﻟﺒ
ﻳﻨﺒ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ.
أ
-ﺗﺒ ﱠﻮﺃ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﱠﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻓﻀﻼ
ﻋﻦ ﺷ ﺼﻴﺘﻪ ﺍ ﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟ ﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻠﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺮﺍﺀ.
ﳚﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﻨ ﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻘ ﻟﻠﺜﻤﺮﺓ ﺍ ﺘﻮﺧﺎﺓ ﻣﻦ -ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ
ﺍﻟﺘﻨ ﲑ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﱄ ،ﻭﲢﺼﻴﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎ " :ﻛﻞ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ
ﻣﺮﺳﻮﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ؛ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺒ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺩﺍﺏ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻮﻧﺎ ﰲ
1
ﺫﻟﻚ؛ ﻓﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﺔ ".
-ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﻤﻄﺎﻟﻊ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﻫﻠﺔ؛ ﻳُﺪﺭﻙ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺬﻭ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻜﻠﻤﲔ ﺣﺬﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺬﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺬﺓ ،ﻭ ﻣﺒﻠ ﻫﻢ ﺍ ﺘﻜﻠﻤﲔ ﺗﻘﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﻭ ﺍ ﺮﺟﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ُﻳﺒﺎﻳﻨﻮﻥ ﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻟ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻣ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻘﻪ،
ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺷﻮﺍﻫﺪﻫﺎ؛ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺳ ﱠﺪﺍ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻠﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻄﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ.
-ﺍ ﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﺗﺘﺒﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺷﺮﺣﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﻮ ﺄ،
ﻭﻣﻨـﺰﻟﺔ ﺍ ﻮ ﺄ ﻻ ﻔﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺩ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﻓﺔ
ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻴﺰﺍ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﺎﻡ ﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ
ﺗﻌﺎﱃ.
ب
ـ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻠﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺍ ﺘﻘﺪﻣﲔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﺍ ﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺮﺩﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻪ ﳑﺠﻮﺟﺔ ﰲ ﺯﻣﻨﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﻄﻠﺒﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ !.
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﱄ ﺩﻭﺍﻓﻊ ﺫﺍﺗﻴﺔ ﺟﺮﺗﻨـﻲ ﺟﺮﺍ ﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮﺿﻮ ،ﻭﻫﻲ:
ـ ﺭﻏﺒ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،ﺣ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺻ ﺔ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﺍ ﺒﻨـﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ.
ـ ﻭﻟﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍ ﺪﻟﻞ.
ـ ﺭﻏﺒ ﰲ ﺧﺪﻣﺔ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻲ ،ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺑﺄﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺍ ﻘﻘﲔ ،ﰲ ﺯﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﺘﻠﻲ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﺟﺎﻣﺪ ،ﺃﻭ ﺎﺩ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻳﻌﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ:
ﺗﻌﺪ ﺩﻻﻻ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ
ﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺍ ﻼ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ؛
ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺃ ﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ .
ﻭﻟﻠﻜﺸ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻟﻴﺔ ،ﺳﻴﺠﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻠﺔ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﺃ ﻬﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄ :
1ـ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ؛ ﻭﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
2ـ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ؛ ﻭﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻤﺎ ﻢ
3ـ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﰲ ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﻭﻫﻞ
ﺧﻼﻓﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍ ﺘﺠﲔ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻔ ﻲ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﺘـﻲ ﺣﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ
ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻭﻫﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻠﺰﻣ ﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ؛ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﰲ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ .
4ـ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺠﺠﻪ ﻭﺭﺩﻭﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺎﻟﻔﻴﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻞ ﺗﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ .
ت
ﺻﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ؛ ﻭﺍﻟ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ
5ـ ﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻡ ﺎ ﺃ ﱠ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻞ ﻢ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﻣﺎ ﻣﺪ
ﺭﺟ ﺎ ﺎ ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻋﺪﻣﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ .
6ـ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨـﺰﻟﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ؛ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺻﱠﻨ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ؛ ﻟﺘ ﺮﻳ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻪ ؛ ﺃﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ
ﺧﺎﻟ ﻗﻨﺎﻋﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ
ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ:
ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎ ﻻ ؛ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ ﻳﺮﻣﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻠﺔ ﺃﻫﺪﺍ ؛ ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ :
1ـ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ؛ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ،ﻣ ﺯﺍ ﻧﻘﺎ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ .
2ـ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍ ﻼ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻫﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻔ ﻲ .
3ـ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﺪ ﺗﺄ ﺮ ﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
4ـ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﻘﻨﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻣ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻲ؛
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻘﺼﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍ ﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
5ـ ﺗﻄﺒﻴ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﺄﻧﻮﺍﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﻋﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ،ﺇ ﺮﺍﺀ
ﺒﺎﺣ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ؛ ﻭﺗﺴﻬﻴﻼ ﻟﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺒﺘﺪﺋﲔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﳑﺎ ﻛﺘﺐ ﰲ ﻣﺒﺎﺣ
ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻳﺸﻜﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻘِﻀﺎﺏ ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱠﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭ؛ ﺣ ﻟُﻴ ﱠﻴﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﺒﺘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻏﲑ ُﻣﺘﺼ ﱠﻮﺭ ﰲ
ﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ.
ﻏﲑ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ث
1ـ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﻮﻗﺸ ﰲ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺎﻣﻌﺔ
ﺍﳊﺎﺝ ﻀﺮ ﺑﺒﺎﺗﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﻨﻴ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ :ﺻﺎﱀ ﺑﻮﺑﺸﻴﺶ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﻴﺰ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ:
ﻣﺸﺮ ﺟﺪﺍ.
ﺴﺒ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻀﻤﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺗﻴﺢ ﻭﺍﳊ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ؛ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺣ ﻴ ﺑﻘﺼﺐ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻄﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﺸﻔﻮﻋﺔ ﺑ ﺭﺍﺀ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ؛ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍ ﺭﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﺳﻴﺬﻟﻞ ﱄ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺒﺎ ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺳﻴﻜﻔﻴ ﻣ ﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺒ
ﺳﻴ ﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﺰﻭﻱ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ.
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺼﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ ؛ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺗﻮﺳﻊ ﺎ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣ ﺑﺎﻗﺘﻀﺎﺏ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﺣﻴ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺈﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﺎﺑﺮﺓ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻠﻪ
ﻟﻨﻮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﺑـ " :ﺇ ﺎ "؛ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺣﺼﺮﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻻ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ؛ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣ ﰲ ﻨﺎﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ.
ﰲ ﺘﻠ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺻﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺩﺭﺍﺳ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺳﺘﻬﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺒ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃ ﺎ ﺳﺘﻌﺮ ﻟ ﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻟﻪ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺧِﻠﻴ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ،
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﷲ Υﻋﻠ ﱠﻲ ،ﺃﻥ ﻗﻴﱠﺾ ﱄ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺑﺸﻴﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻓﺎ ـ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍ ﺒﲑ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ـ؛
ﻟﻴﺸﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺯﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺧﻮ ﻏﻤﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ .
2ـ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﻠﺼﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻘ ﻷ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ
ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺣ ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ :ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻴﻬﻮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺘﺴﺠﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺳﻨﺔ 1999ﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﲑ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﻟﻠﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﻘﺴﻨﻄﻴﻨﺔ ﺑﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭﺍﻩ؛ 1ﻭﻫﻲ ﻟﻴﻮﻡ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﻮﺭ؛ ﺗ ﻬﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ.
ﻫﺬﺍ؛ ﻭ ﺼﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩ ﻴﺔ ﺍﻟ ﻋﻨﻴ ﺒﺎﺣ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻻ ﺑﺄﺱ ﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ؛ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍ ﻠﻌ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ـ ﳑﺎ ﻭﻗﻌ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﺪﻱ ـ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﻦ ﺎﻟﻊ ﻓﻬﺮﺱ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ ؛ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻓﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﷲ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ؛ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﻲ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻔﺎ ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ:
.91 ، 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﲑ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﻟﻠﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒ
ج
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺭﻓﻴﻘﻨﺎ ﻣﻮﻗ ﺃ ـ ﺇﻏﻔﺎ ﺎ ﻟﻌﺮ
ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ؛ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﺣ ﻟﻴ ﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻓﻘ .
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ؛ ﻓﺈﻣﱠﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﰲ ﺏ ـ ﺣ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎ ﺍﻟ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻮﻗ
ﻧﻮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻘ ،ﻭ ﻤﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﻴﺔ؛ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻘﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍ ﻄﺄ؛ ﻛﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﺒﺪ
1
ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﺭﺍﺟﺢ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺠﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ.
ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﻣﺒﺎﺣ ﻋﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇ ﺎﻻ ﺼﻨﻔﺎ ﺝـﺳﱠ
ﺠﻠ
ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎ ﺍﻟ ﻛﺘﺒ ﰲ ﻣﺒﺎﺣ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻻ .
ﺻ ﻴﺢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﱠﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍ ﻨﺼﺮﻡ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭﻭﻥ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺗﻨﺘﺸﺮ
ﺑﻌﺪ؛ ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﻓﻼ ﻋﺬﺭ ﻢ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻣﻀ ﻋﻘﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺸﺮ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ.
ﺩ ـ ﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎ ؛ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺭﺍﺟﺢ؛ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻐ
ﺑﺎﻟﱠﻨﺺ ﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻣﺜﺎﻻ ،ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳ ﺃﻏﺰﺭ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﺎﻭﺯ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﻭﻧﻴ ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻣ
ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣ .
ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺩ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺍ ﻦ .... " :ﺇﺫ ﻛﻞ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣ ﺃﻥ ﺼﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﺍﻟ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺮﺓ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺘﻠ ﺍ ﺬﺍﻫﺐ،
2
ﺍﺳﺘ ﻘ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ".
ح
1ـ ﺇ ﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺃ ﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ :ﻭُﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺪﻭﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ
ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ؛ ﻓﻜﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﻻ ﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮ ﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭﺍ؛ ﺃﻭ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺘﺰﺃﺓ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺭﺍﻛﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴ ﻬﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻻﺣﻘﺎ.
ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻘ ﺷﺮ ﺍﳌﻮﻃ :ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺭﺍﻓﺪ ﺃﻣﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮﺟﻞ؛ ﻭﻣﻦ ـ 2
؛ ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠ ﱠﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻭﻓﻘﻨـﻲ ﳉﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ؛ ﻭﺃﺣﺴﺐ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﻔﺘ ﺷﻲﺀ ﱠﳑﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﻠ ﺑﺎﻟﺒ
ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻧ ﱠﺪ ﻋﻨﻲ ،ﻭﻟﺴ ﻣ ﺋﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺃﺑـﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ.
3ـ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﳊ ﺎﺝ :ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻓﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺍ ﺫﺍ ﺑﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴ ﻬﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺭ ﻬﻮﺭﺍ
ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺄ ﺮﻩ ﻢ ﺟﻠﻲ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺎﻫﺮ ﻦ ﺎﻟﻊ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ،ﻭﺗﺼﻔﺢ ُﻣﺘﻔﻀﻼ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺒ .
ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻨﻮﻋ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺒ ﻭﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺔ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﺔ؛ ﻏﲑ ﺃ ﺑﺬﻟ
ﺟﻬﺪﻱ ﰲ ﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﲔ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﻗﻌﺪ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻦﱠ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ 1،ﻭ ﺃ ﻞ ﺟﻬﺪ ﺍ ﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻜﻢ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻟ ﺧﺮ .
1
ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﺎ :ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎ ).(67/1
خ
ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ:
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺘـﻲ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄ :
ـ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﺍ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻧﻴﺔ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺣﻔﺺ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺎﺻﻢ؛ ﻭﺗﻮ ﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺭﻗﻢ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﺎﻣﺶ.
ـ ﺧ ﱠﺮﺟ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻳﺔ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴ ﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﺍﻛﺘﻔﻴ
ﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺃﺟﺎﻭﺯﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻣﻮ ﺄ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻟﺘﻌﻠ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﻪ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋ ِﺪﻣﺘُﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺧ ﱠﺮﺟﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍ ﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ؛ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﺋﻤﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﻴﺔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺧﺮﺟ ﺍ ﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﺗﻮﺳﻊ؛ ﻭﺃﻛﺘﻔﻲ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ.
ـ ﻻ ﺃﺗﺮﺟﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻟ ﻋﻼﻡ ﺍ ﻐﻤﻮﺭﻳﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻼﺏ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ.
ـ ﺍﺳﺘ ﺪﻣ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺒﻌﺎ ؛ ﻓﺎﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺮﺩﺓ ،ﺃﻣﺎ
ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻓﺄﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍ ﻘ ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ُﻋ ِﺪﻡ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ؛ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺼﻨﻔﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻓﻘﺪ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺎ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ؛ ﻷ ﺃﻗ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻪ.
ـ ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺒﺔ.
ـ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻘﻠﺘﻪ ﺑﻨﺼﻪ ﺃﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﺑﲔ ﺷﻮﻟﺘﲔ ،ﻭﺃﺣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮ ﻨﻪ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍ ﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ
ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻨـﻲ ﺃﺣﻴﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﱄ :ﺍﻧ ﺮ؛ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺭﺩﻓﻪ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺼﺎﺩﺭ؛ ﺍﻟ ﺗﺸﺘﻤﻞ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺰﺋﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺒ .
ﺑﻔﻬﺎﺭﺱ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻣﻠ ﻘﺔ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺧﺮﻩ ،ﺗﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻬﺮﺱ ﻟ ﻳﺎ ، ـ ﺯﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺒ
ﻭﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳ ،ﻭﺍ ﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺑﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻓﻬﺮﺱ ﺍ ﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍ ﺮﺍﺟﻊ؛ ﺧﺘﻤﺘﻬﺎ
ﺑﻔﻬﺮﺱ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻠﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ .
د
ـ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻴﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﺬﻟ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺪﻱ
ﻟﻠﻮﻗﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
ـ ﺍﺳﺘ ﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺒﻌﺎ ﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻮﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺧﺮ ،ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟـﻤﻨﺘﻘﻰ؛ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﺮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗ ﺟﺰﺀﺍ ﻟﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺴﲑ.
ﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ:
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﲢﻘﻴﻘﺎ ﻟ ﻫﺪﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ؛ ﻭﺣﻼ ﻟ ﺷﻜﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻄﺮﻭﺣﺔ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮ ﺍﻟﺒ
ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪﻱ ﻋﺮﱠﻓ ﺑﺎﻹﻣـﺎﻡ ﻬﻴﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻼ ﺔ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍ ﺒ ﺍ ﻄﺔ؛ ﻭﺍﻧﺘ ﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺒ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﺈﳚﺎﺯ؛ ﻋﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺩﻟﻴـﻞ ﺍ ﻄـﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋـﻪ ﻋﻨـﺪ
ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻣﺒﻴﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﺎ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ .
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻋﺮﺿ ﳊﺠﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻓﺄﺑﺮﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻟﻴﲔ
ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍﻹ ﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﺍ ﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻋﻄﻔﺘﻪ ﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺒﻴﻨﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻪ
ﻭﺃ ﻴﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻣ ﺯﺍ ﰲ ﻧﻔ ﺍﻟﻮﻗ ﺍ ﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍ ﺘﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ،ﻋﻘﺪ ﺍ ﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ
ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺎﻟﻔﻴﻪ ،ﻣ ﺯﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ.
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻋﺮﺿ ﻟ ﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ،ﻭﻭﻗﻔـ ﻋﻠﻴﻬـﺎ ﺑـﺎﻟﺘﻘﻮ ،
ﻭﺧﺘﻤ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺎ ﺔ ﺩ ﱠﻭﻧ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻧﺘﺎﺋ ﺍﻟﺒ .
ﻤﺪ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺧﺎ ﺔ ﺍ ﻄﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻄﺔ ﺍ ﺗﻴﺔ: ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺍﻟﺒ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ :
ﻣﺒﺤﺚ ﻬﻴﺪ :ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻧﺴﺒﻪ ،ﻣﻮﻟﺪﻩ ﻭﻭﻓﺎﺗﻪ.
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻋﺼﺮﻩ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ :ﺭﺣﻼﺗﻪ ﻭﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﺷﻴﻮﺧﻪ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺃﻗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻭﺗﻼﻣﻴﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻗﺮﺍﻧﻪ
ذ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﺗﻼﻣﻴﺬﻩ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﳋﺎﻣ :ﻣﻨﺎ ﺮﺍﺗﻪ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩ :ﻨﺘﻪ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ :ﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻣﻦ :ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎﺗﻪ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﻪ
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﲡﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ ﻭﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﺍﲡﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﰲ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﺃﻧﻮ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﲡﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ
ﻭﺑﻴﺎ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺣﺠﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍﻹ ﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍﻹ ﺎﻝ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃ ﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻭﺃﺳﺒﺎﺑﻪ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﺃ ﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮﻗ ﰲ ﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﺣﺠﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ،ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻬﻢ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍ ﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴﺢ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ
ر
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻬﻢ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍ ﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴﺢ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ :ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍ ﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴﺢ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ :ﺃﺛﺮ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻗﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍ
: ﻭﲢﺘﻪ ﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻌﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨ ﻮ ﺍ
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭ :ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﺎ ﺃ ﱠ
ﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻗﺴﻢ ﺍ ﻌﺎﻣﻼ
ﻭ ﲢﺘﻪ ﻼ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ.
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭ :ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﺎ ﺃ ﱠ
ﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺍﳋﺎ ﺔ:
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺎ ﺍ ﻔﺼﻠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃ ﺒ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﺝ ﲢﺘﻬﺎ ﻣـﻦ ﺟﺰﺋﻴـﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻔﻬﺮﺱ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻠﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ،ﻭ ﺧﺮ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎ ﲔ.
ز
ﻣـﺒﺤﺚ ﺗﻤﻬﻴـﺪ :ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑ ﺑـﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴـﺪ ﺍﻟﺒـﺎﺟﻲ
ﺇﻥ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸ ﺼﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺬﺓ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺮ ﻛـﺜﲑ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﺒـﺎﺣﺜﲔ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺑـﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﺘـﻀﺎﺏ ﻟﺘﺮ ﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﲔ ﻣُﺴﻬﺐ ﻭ ﺘﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺳﺄﻋﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺒ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ،ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻮ ﺔ ﺎ ﻋﺰﻣﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺭﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻊ ﻓﻠﻴ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻠﻪ ،ﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻘﺼﺪﻧﺎ ﻣـﻦ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ .
1ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ) ،(198/1ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺴﺎﻛﺮ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﻤﺎﺋﺔ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭﻱ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺗـﺎﺭﻳ
ﺩﻣﺸ ).(226/22
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(808/2ﺍ ﻘﺮﻱ :ﻧﻔﺢ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ) ،(67/2ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻭﺩﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍ ﻔﺴﺮﻳﻦ ).(208/1
3ـ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺪﻟ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﺭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺮ ﻧﺔ ﻏﺮ ﻗﺮ ﺒﺔ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳊﻤـﻮﻱ :ﻣﻌﺠـﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻠـﺪﺍﻥ )،(530/1
ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻠﺒﻜﻲ :ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﺍ ﻮﺭﺩ ).(11/2
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﺮﺍﻏﻲ :ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﺍ ﺒﲔ ،265 ،ﻛ ﺎﻟﺔ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺍ ﻟﻔﲔ ) ،(788/1ﻋﻨﺎﻥ :ﺩﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋ .433 ،
5ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻘ ﻱ؛ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﺷﺮﺣﻪ ﻟﻠﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ؛ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 406ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(675/2ﺍﻟﻀ :ﺑﻐﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻠﺘﻤ .112 ،
1
ﺍﳊﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ؛ ﺯ ﱠﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺑﻨﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻴﻬﺔ 1،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺷﺎﻛﺮ ﺍﻟـﺸﻬﲑ ﺑـﺎﺑﻦ
ﺍﻟﻘ ﻱ 2،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﺍﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ.
3
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺪﻟ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺃﺭﺟﺢ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺳﻨﺔ 474ﻫـ .
ﺍﻟﻤﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻋﺼــﺮﻩ
ﺷﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍ ﺎﻣ ﺍ ﺠﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍ ﻋﻘﺪ ﺍﻷ ﱠﻣﺔ ﺑﺴﻘﻮ ﺍ ﻼﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﱠﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺪﻟ ،ﻭ ﻬـﺮ
ﻟﻠﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋ ،ﻓﺎﺳﺘﺄ ﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺃﻣﲑ ﻗﻄﺮ ﺎ ﲢ ﻳﺪﻩ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻘﻠﺒ ﺍﻷﺧ ﱠﻮﺓ ﻋﺪﺍﻭﺓ ،ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺗﻞ
ﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻘﺒﺔ ،ﻓﻜﻞ ﺃﻣﲑ ﻳﻄﻤﺢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻐ ﻤﺔ ﺍ ﻠﻚ ـﻢ ﺇﱃ
ﻣ ﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺮﺿﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﺑﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﳉﺰﻳﺔ ﻢ ،ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻠﺒﻮﻥ ﺃﺭﺍﺿـﻴﻬﻢ
ﺷ ﺍ ﺷ ﺍ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍ ﺘﻌﻔﻦ ﻭﻟﺪ ﺭﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻓﻔﺸﺎ ﺷﺮﺏ ﺍ ﻤﺮ ﻭﺍﻻﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣـﻦ
ﻣ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺍ ﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻻ ﺮﺍ ،ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻓﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻏﻔﻠﺔ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻐﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌـﺪﻭ ﻳﺘـﺮﱠﺑﺺ ـﻢ
4
ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺋﺮ.
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺘﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤ ﱠﻲ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺒﻴﺐ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﺼﺐ ﺍ ﺮﺍﺣـﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﱠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘـﻲ ﻣ ﱠﺮ ﺎ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ،ﻭﻣﺮﺩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻋ ﱠﺪﺓ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ؛ ﻟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﱃ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﺩﺑﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺘﺒﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﰲ ﺇﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﺍ ﻜﺘﺒﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍ ﺎﺻﺔ ،ﻭﻧﺎﻓﺴﻮﺍ ﺃﻏﻴـﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﰲ
5
ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻋ ﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺯﺩﻫﺎﺭﺍ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺣﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻ ﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ؛
ﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻜﻤﻬﻢ؛ ﻭﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﺿﺎ ،ﻓﻼ ﻣﻨﺎ ﱄ ﻣـﻦ ﺗـﺴﻠﻴ ﺴﻨﺪ ﰲ ﺇﺿﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﻷﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻟﻠﻔﻘﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺣ ﻧﺘﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻘﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺾ ﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ؛
ﻋﻘﺐ ﺭﺟﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺣﻠﺘﻪ ﺍ ﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ.
1ـ ﺑﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﻠﻤﻴﺬ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺃ ﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻏﺰﻟﻮﻥ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺴﺎﻛﺮ :ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺩﻣﺸ ).(226/22
2ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺷﺎﻛﺮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻴ ﺍﻟﻘ ﻱ ،ﻧﺒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 456ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ) ،(365/1ﺍﻟﻀ :ﺑﻐﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻠﺘﻤ ،342 ،ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ).(818/2
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ) ،(199/1ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(808/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﻜﺎﻥ :ﻭﻓﻴﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻴﺎﻥ ).(409/2
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ :ﺍﻟﺘﻠ ﻴﺺ ﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻠﻴﺺ ) ،(173/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺴﺎﻡ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(129/1-4ﻋﻨﺎﻥ :ﺩﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋـ ،
112 -98ﻭ.424
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻘﺮﻱ :ﻧﻔﺢ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ) ،(190/3ﻋﻨﺎﻥ :ﺩﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋ 423 ،ﻭ .436
2
ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠ ُﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﺯﺍﻋﻲ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻴﺎ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺓ ،ﻭﺟﺰﺀﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﺭﺓ 1،ﺑﺪﺃ ﺒﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﻓـﺸﻴ ﺎ ،ﻭﺗﻘ ﱠﺪﻣـﻪ
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻋ ﱠﺪﺓ ﻟﻴ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻞ ﺑﺴﻄﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺣ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺩﻗﺔ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ،ﻫﻲ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣـﻦ
ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟﺴﻴﲔ ﺣﺮﺻﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ،ﻭ ـﺎﻟﻔﻮﻩ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ـﺎ
ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻔﻮﺍ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﻘ 2،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ﻟﺰﻭﻣﺎ ﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳـﻢ
ﻫﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻗﺮ ﺒﺔ؛ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﺮ ﻮﺷﻲ..." :ﺃﺧ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺓ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺑﻘﺮ ﺒﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻭﻟﻮﺍ ﺭﺟﻼ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ،ﺷﺮ ﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺳﺠﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟـﺪﻩ ...ﻭﻫـﺬﺍ
3
ﺟﻬﻞ ﻋ ﻴﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊ ﻟﻴ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻌﲔ."...
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ " :ﻻ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻗﻮﻣﺎ ﺃﺷ ﱠﺪ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻜـﺎ ﻻ
4
ﳚﻴﺰ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ".
ﻭﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻮﺩﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﺒﻨﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻔـ
ﺍ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﻭﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ ﰲ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺍ ﺸﺮ ،ﻭﺑـﺎﻷﺧﺺ
ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍ ؛ ﺍﻟ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺗﻨﻬ ﻣﻨﻬ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺻﻴﻞ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺮﳚﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻨﻬ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺳﻌﻔﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻤﻮﺩ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍ ﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺳﻬﺎ ﻣـﺬﻫﺐ
ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻌﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺍ ﻨﺎ ﺮﺓ ﻭ ﺮ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ،ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ؛ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻧﺴﺘﻬﺠﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍ ﺪ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺣﺰﻡ 5،ﻭ ﳚﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺼﺪﻩ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﻬ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺻﻴﻞ ﻭﻓ ﱠﻦ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﻭﺍ ﻨـﺎ ﺮﺓ ﺧـﻼﻝ
ﻣﺴﲑﺗﻪ ﺍ ﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ.
1ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻄ ﻱ ،ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻲ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺷﺮ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﺰ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 450ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ،127 ،ﺍﻹﺳﻨﻮﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ) ،(58/2ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ).(668/17
2ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ،ﻟﻪ ﻠﺪ ﺿ ﻢ ﰲ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺃ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 436ﻫــ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻄﻴﺐ :ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ) ،(78/8ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ :ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍ ﻀﻴﺔ ) ،(117/2ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ).(616/17
3ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻣﻐﺎ ،ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬ ﺭﺋﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺑﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﺳﻨﺔ 478ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻄﻴﺐ :ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ) ،(109/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ :ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍ ﻀﻴﺔ ) ،(270/3ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ).(485/18
4ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳ ﺎ ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻳﻮﺳ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ،ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺘﻪ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 476ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻹﺳﻨﻮﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ) ،(7/2ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ) ،(453/18ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﻜﺎﻥ :ﻭﻓﻴﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻴﺎﻥ ).(29/1
5ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﻱ ،ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻲ ،ﻟﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺣﺴﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،ﺗﻮﰲ 452ﻫــ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻄﻴﺐ :ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ) ،(339/2ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(763/2ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ.169 ،
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) (53/1ﻭ) ،(763/2ﺗﺮﻛﻲ :ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﲢﻘﻴ ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ.13 ،
7ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺣﻠﻲ ،ﺍﺷﺘﻐﻞ ﺑﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻭﻗﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 441ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻄﻴﺐ :ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ) ،(103/3ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ).(627/17
8ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ) ،(198/1ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(802/2ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ).(630/17
9ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ،ﺣﻨﻔﻲ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻟﻪ ﺗﺼﺎﻧﻴ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺗﻌﻠﻴ ،ﻭﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 444ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻄﻴﺐ :ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ) ،(355/1ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ :ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍ ﻀﻴﺔ ).(57/3
10ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(802/2ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺍﻟﺴﲑ ) ،(537/18ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩ :ﺷﺬﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺐ ).(345/3
11ـ ﻛﺄ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺴﺎﺭ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺎ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ).(537/18
5
ﺍﻟﻤﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺃﻗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻭﺗﻼﻣﻴﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻗﺮﺍﻧﻪ
ﻗﺪ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﻟ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺳﺒﺒﻪ ﺇﻗﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻧ ﺮﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﺎﻓﺴﻮﻧﻪ ﺳـ ﺩﺩ
ﺠ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﻨﺠﻮﻡ ﻻﻣﻌﺔ ،ﻴ ﺍﻟﻠﺜﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻗﺘﻀﺎﺏ ﻋـﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃ ﺫﻟﻚ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋ ﱠ
ﻼ ﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻢ:
ﺃ ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺰﻡ :ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﱠﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ،ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ،ﻭﻟﺪ ﺑﻘﺮ ﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺳﻨﺔ 384ﻫـ ،ﻟﻌﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺫﺍ ﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺳ ﺩﺩ ،ﻓﺄﺑﻮﻩ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺷﺒﻴﺒﺘﻪ.
ﺃﻗﺒﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺎﻓﻊ ،ﻭ ُﻋ ﺃ ﱠﻭﻝ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ،ﻣﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎﻧﺔ ،ﻓﺘﻔﻘﻪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ،ﻟﻴﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻓﺒﻌﺜﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﺩ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ.
ﻧﻬﺾ ﺑﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺷﱠﺘﻰ ،ﻓ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻭﺍﻟﻄـﺐ ﻭﻋﻠـﻢ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻣﻊ ﺗﻘﻮ ﻭﺯﻫﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻔﺎﺭﻗﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻋِﻴﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺳﻼ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ،ﺣ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ" :ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺑـﻦ
1
ﺣﺰﻡ ﻭﺳﻴ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺷﻘﻴﻘﲔ".
ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺟﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎ ،ﺃﺣﺮ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺮﺗﻪ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ 2،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎ ﺍ ﺘﺮ ﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ،ﺍ ﻠـﻰ،
3
ﺍﻟﻔِﺼﻞ ،ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ ،ﺗﻮﻓﻲ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺔ 456ﻫـ.
ﺏ ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟ :ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻳﻮﺳ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺮﻱ 4،ﻭﻟﺪ ﺳﻨﺔ 368ﻫـ،
ﺣ ﱠﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻛﺒﺎﺭ ﺍ ﺪ ﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ،ﻭﺗﻔﻘﻪ ﺑﻔﻘﻬﺎﺋﻬﺎ ،ﻭ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺭﺣﻠﺔ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧـﺪﻟ
ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺷ ،ﻭ ﺗﺜﺒ ﺣ ﺭﺣﻠﺘﻪ ﻟﻠ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻋﺬﺍﺭ.
ﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺍ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺑ ﱠﺮﺯ ﰲ ﺣﻔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﻳﺔ ﺑﻄﺮﻗﻪ
5
ﻭﺭﺟﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ " :ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺪﻟ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺃ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ".
1ـ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺱ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﻳ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﻜﺎﻥ :ﻭﻓﻴﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻴﺎﻥ ).(328/3
2ـ ﻛﺼﻨﻴﻊ ﺍ ﻌﺘﻀﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺩ؛ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺑﺈﺣﺮﺍ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﺑﺈﺷﺒﻴﻠﻴﺔ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺴﺎﻡ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ).(95/1-2
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻀ :ﺑﻐﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻠﺘﻤ ، 365 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ) ،(395/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﻜﺎﻥ :ﻭﻓﻴـﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻴـﺎﻥ )،(408/2
ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻡ ﺑﻮﻓﻴﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻼﻡ ) (303/1ﻭﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ) ،(185/18ﺃﺑﻮ ﺯﻫﺮﺓ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ 34 ،ﻭ.79
4ـ ﻫﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻗﺎﺳ ﺑﻦ ﺭﺑﻴﻌﺔ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﺍﻷﻧﺴﺎﺏ ) ،(524/5ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ).(808/2
5ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ).(641/2
6
ﻗﻴﻞ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃ ﱠﻭﻝ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﺃ ﺮﻳﺎ ﺎﻫﺮﻳﺎ؛ ﲢﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻣﻊ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑـﻴﻦ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻘـﻪ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ.
ﻟﻪ ﻣ ﻟﻔﺎ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ،ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺬﻛﺎﺭ ،ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﺻ ﺎﺏ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻫـﻲ
1
ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 463ﻫـ.
ﺝ ـ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺪﺍﺩ :ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺃ ﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺎﺑ ،ﻭﻟﺪ ﺳﻨﺔ 392ﻫـ ،ﻭﺍﺑﺘـﺪﺃ
ﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺳﻨﲔ ،ﻓﺮﺣﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻘﺎ ﺷ ،ﻊ ﺧﻼ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺪ ﲔ.
ﺃﺧﺬ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻳﺪ ﺃ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻄ ﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ،ﻭﺣ ﱠﺪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﺣ ﱠﺪ
ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻛﺎﻥ ﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴ ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻﱠﻨ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣ ﺔ ﻣﺼﻨ ،ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ :ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ،
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻴﻪ ﻭﺍ ﺘﻔﻘﻪ ،ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﻳﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ.
2
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 463ﻫـ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﻔ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺗﻮﰲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻓ ﺍ ﻐﺮﺏ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(808/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ) ،(640/2ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋـﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨـﺒﻼﺀ )(153/18
ﻭﺍﻹﻋﻼﻡ ) ،(307/1ﻠﻮ :ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﻴﺔ ).(176/1
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺍﻟﺴﲑ ) ،(270/18ﺍﻹﺳﻨﻮﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ) ،(99/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﻜﺎﻥ :ﻭﻓﻴﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻴﺎﻥ ).(92/1
3ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﺪ ﻟﺒﺰﺍﺭ ﰲ ﲢﻘﻴﻘﻪ ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﲢﻘﻴ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺗﻮﻝ :ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﲢﻘﻴ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ.99 ،
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ) ،(73/1ﺍﻟﻀ :ﺑﻐﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻠﺘﻤ ،155 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﺮﺣﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺒﺎﺝ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ، 40 ،ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :
ﺍﻟﺴﲑ ) ،(545/18ﻠﻮ :ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ).(179/1
7
ﺏ ــ ﺍﳉﱠﻴﺎ 1:ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺪ ،ﻭﻟﺪ ﺳﻨﺔ 427ﻫـ ،ﺭﻭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﺍﺑـﻦ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟ ﻭﺃ ﺷﺎﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻘ ﻱ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ،ﻭﺭﻭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺎﻋﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ.
ﺑﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺴﺎﺏ؛ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎﺗﻪ :ﺗﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺍ ﻬﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻴﻴﺰ ﺍ ﺸﻜﻞ ﰲ ﺭﺟﺎﻝ
2
ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴ ﲔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 498ﻫـ.
ﺝ ــ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﻜﺮﺓ :ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺣﺴﲔ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻓﱠﻴﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﰲ ،ﺭﻭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ،
ﺭﺣﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊ ،ﻓﻠﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮ ﻮﺷﻲ ﻭﺃﺑﺎ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻲ 3،ﺩﺧﻞ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﻓﺴﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺪ ﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺗﻔﻘﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺸﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺷﻲ 4،ﻟﲑﺟﻊ ﻋﻘﺒﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ،ﻓﻮُﻟﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﻜﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﻰ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻛ ﱠ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ.
ﺑﺮ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻣ ﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ :ﺍﳊﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺻـ ﱠﺮ ﺍﺑـﻦ
5
ﻣﺼﻨﻔﻪ. ﺣﺠﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺭ ﻩ
7
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺸﻬﺪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺴﺒﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻧﺰﻛﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﺑﻮﻗﻌﺔ ﻗﺘﻨﺪﺓ 6،ﺳﻨﺔ 514ﻫـ.
ﺩ ــ ﺍﻟﻄﺮ ﻮﺷﻲ :ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﱠﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﱠﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲُ ،ﻋ ِﺮ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺑﻦ
ﺭﻧﺪﻗﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺪ ﺑﻄﺮ ﻮﺷﺔ 8،ﺩﺭﺱ ﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ،ﱠﻮ ﻣﺮﲢﻼ ﰲ ﺃﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ؛ ﻓﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺣﺰﻡ ﻭﺗﻔﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﺭﺣﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﺸﺮ ﻓﺘﻔﻘﻪ ﺑﻔﻘﻬﺎﺋﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﺎﺷﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ.
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻋﺎﻩ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﱠﻳﺔ ﺎ ﻫﻠﻚ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻳﺪ ﺍﻟ ُﻌﺒﻴﺪﻳﲔ ،ﻣﻦ ﺎﺭﻩ :ﺍﻟﱠﺘﻌﻠﻴﻘﺔ ﻓـﻲ
1ـ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺎ ﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺪﻟ ،ﺗﻘﻊ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻗﺮ ﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻓﺮﺳ ﺎ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳊﻤﻮﻱ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ) ،(226/2ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻠﺒﻜﻲ :ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﺍ ﻮﺭﺩ ).(220/5
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻀ :ﺑﻐﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻠﺘﻤ ،227 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ) ،(141/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﻜﺎﻥ :ﻭﻓﻴﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻴﺎﻥ ).(180/2
3ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﺃ ﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪﻱ ،ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺼﺮﺓ ،ﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻟﻴ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﰲ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﻭﺍ ﻼ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 489ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(791/2ﻠﻮ :ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ).(172/1
4ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺷﻲ ،ﺷﻴ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 488ﻫـ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻹﺳﻨﻮﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ
) ،(14/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ :ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ) ،(129/12ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻪ ﻭﺭﺟﺎﻟﻪ.186 ،
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ) ،(474/2ﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺻ ﻱ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺍ ﺼﻨﻔﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ.180 ،
6ـ ﻗﺘﻨﺪﺓ :ﺑﻠﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺪﻟ ﺑﺜﻐﺮ ﺳﺮﻗﺴﻄﺔ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳊﻤﻮﻱ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ).(351/4
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻀ :ﺑﻐﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻠﺘﻤ ،230 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ) ،(143/1ﻠﻮ :ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ).(188/1
8ـ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺑﻠﻨﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﻗﺮ ﺒﺔ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ،ﺑﻨﻴ ﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﺑﺮﺓ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳊﻤﻮﻱ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ).(34/4
8
2
ﺍ ﻼﻓﻴﺎ 1،ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﰲ ﺑﺎﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺔ 520ﻫـ.
1ـ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻘﺔ :ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﺬﻛﺮﺍﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍ ﺘﻘﺪﻡ؛ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺇﻓـﺎﺩﺍ
ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫﻩ ،ﻳﺴﺘ ﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺿﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫﻩ ﺑﻐﺮ ﺗﺮﻗﻴﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻹﻓﺘﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺮﻭ ﺗﺄﻟﻴ ﻟﻠﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺜﺎﺑـﺔ
ﺃﻭﻝ ﺇﺻﺪﺍﺭ ﻟﻪ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ :ﻣﻨﻬ ﺍﻟﺒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ.241 ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﻜﻮﺍﻝ :ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ) ،(545/2ﺍﻟﻀ :ﺑﻐﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻠﺘﻤ .119 ،
3ـ ﻫﻲ ﺟﺰﻳﺮﺓ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺾ ﺍ ﺘﻮﺳ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛ ﺟﺰﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻴﺎﺭ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳊﻤﻮﻱ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ) ،(285/5ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻠﺒﻜﻲ :ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﺍ ﻮﺭﺩ ).(174/6
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ :ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ) ،(88 ،77 ،74/5) ،(161/1ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ) ،(69/1ﻭﻟﻠﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳـﺘﻞ
ﺩﻣﺸﻘﻴﺔ ﺭﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻪ ﻮﻗ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
9
ﺑﺎ ﺼﻢ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﺎ ﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﻌﻮﺭﻩ ﻮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﺄﻳﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻟﻴ
1
ﺍ ﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﻛﺴﺮﻩ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﺰﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺯﻫﺮﺓ ،ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻴﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﻣـﻦ
ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻐﻠﻮﺑﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺠﺎﺝ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺼﲑ ﺍ ﻳﺪ ،ﻭ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﻟﻠ ﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟ ﺍﻫﲔ،
2
ﺑﻞ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﺪﺩﺍ ﻭﺃﻋﺰ ﻧﻔﲑﺍ ."...
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺟﻨﺢ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺗﺮﺟﻴ ﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺸﻴﻌﺎ ﻷﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﺑـ ﺃﻣﻴـﺔ،
3
ﺎﻧﺒﺎ ﻷﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋ ،ﻣﺴﺘﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻄﺎﻳﺎﻫﻢ ،ﻣﺴ ﺮﺍ ﺣ ﱠﺪﺓ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﺇﱠﺑﺎﻥ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺴﺎﺏ؛
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻟﺪ ﺭﻏﺒﺔ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻠﺺ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺪﻋﻮ ﺎﻫﺮﻳﺘﻪ ،ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﻳﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺬ ﱠﻣﺔ
ﺃﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺗﺐ! ،ﻓﺄﻧﻔﻘ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺓ.
ﺴﻼ ﲔ، ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻨـﺰﻟﺔ ﻣ ﻣﻦ ﻝ ﻓﺮﻋﻮﻥ ،ﻓﻮ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟـ ﱠ
ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺟﻮﺍﺋﺰﻫﻢ ،ﻭﺻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺭﻫﻢ؛ ﻣﻘﺘﻔﻴﺎ ﻣﻨﻬ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ،ﻣﺴﺘﻐﻼ ﺟﺎﻫـﻪ ﰲ
ﺼ ﻭﺷـﺪ ﺃﺯﺭ ﻣﺼﻠ ﺔ ﺍﻷ ﱠﻣﺔ؛ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋ ؛ ﻟـﺮﺃﺏ ﺍﻟـ ﱠ
4
ﺍ ﺮﺍﺑﻄﲔ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﺔ ﺍ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻴ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺰﺍﺣ .
ﺿ ﱠﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇ ﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﳊﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺭﻛﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟـﺴﻠﻄﺎﻥ ﺷـﱠﻨﻊ ُ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﺣﺘﺮ ﺗﻌﺼﺒﺎ ﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ؛ ﺭﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﻼﻝ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺜﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟ ﻻ ﻔﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﻦ ﺎﻟﻊ ﻣﺼﱠﻨﻔﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺬﺍ ﻏﺮﺿﺎ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺎ ﻟﻠﻄﺮﻓﲔ.
ﻱ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺳﺠﺎﻻ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻫﺰ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻗﺮﺏ ﻟﺪ ﱠ
ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﻮﺧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،ﻭﻗﻠﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺘﺰﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﻨﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻴ ﺔ ﺍﻷﻧـﺪﻟ ﺍﻟـ
ﺗﻀﻴ ﺫﺭﻋﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺎﻟ ،ﻗﱠﻴﺪ ﰲ ﻧ ﺮﻱ ﻼﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﲡﺮﺩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺎﻫﺮﻳﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻣﺎ ﺳﺘ ﻬﺮ ـ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ـ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ ،ﻭﺃﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍ ﻨﺘﺼﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺍ ﻨﻬﺰﻡ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻷ ﱠﻣﺔ ﺇﺟﻼ ﻤﺎ ﻭﺗﻮﻗﲑ ﺎ ،ﺗﺄﺩﺑﺎ ﺑﺄﺩﺏ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺍ ﺴﺘﻌﺎﻥ.
.426 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻘﺮﻱ :ﻧﻔﺢ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ) ،(77/2ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺜﻴﺎ :ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟﺴﻲ،
2ـ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺯﻫﺮﺓ :ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﺍ ﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ.522 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ :ﺍﻟﺘﻠ ﻴﺺ ) ،(176/3ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ) ،(201/18ﺃﺑﻮ ﺯﻫﺮﺓ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ 37 ،ﻭ.49
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(207/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺴﺎﻡ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ) ،(95/1-2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﻜـﺎﻥ :ﻭﻓﻴـﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻴـﺎﻥ )119/7
ﻭ ،(327ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟ ﻓﺘﻮ ﰲ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺟﻮﺍﺋﺰ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﺎﻥ؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻘﺮﻱ :ﻧﻔﺢ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ).(235/3
10
ﺍﻟﻤﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩ :ﳏﻨﺘﻪ
1
ﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﺪﺍ ﺍﻟ ُﻋ ﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺮﺟﻢ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺃ ﻓﺼﻮ ﺎ ﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺩﺍﻧﻴـﺔ،
ﺣﻴ ﻗﺮِﺃ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺍ ﻘﺎﺿﺎﺓ ﰲ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺒﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻪ " :ﻓﺄﺧﺬ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ـ ﻭﻟﻴ ﺴﻦ
ﻳﻜﺘﺐ ـ ﻓﻜﺘﺐ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﺿﻰ ﻤﱠﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ 2،" ...ﻓﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑ ﺎﻫﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺻ ﱠﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ ε
ﻗﺪ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻌ ﺃﻣﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺜﺔ ،ﻭﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺑﻴﺪﻩ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺒﻴﺔ.
ﻓﺜﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ؛ ﻭﻛﻔﺮﻩ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﺪﻋﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻟﻠﻘﺮ ﻥ 3،ﻭﺃ ﻠ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﺍﻟﻠﻌﻨﺔ ﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻬﻢ:
4
ﺑﺮﺋ ﱠﳑﻦ ﺷﺮ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺑ ﺧﺮﺓ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺒﺎ.
ﺠﺘﻪ ،ﻓﺄﺩﱃ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻳ ﺑـﺪﻟﻮﻩ، ﻓ ُﺮِﻓﻊ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﺇﱄ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺩﺍﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻓﺠﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘ ﻬﺮ ﻛﻼ ﱠ
ﺠﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﻤﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺍﺳﺘ ﺴﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺳﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓ ﻬﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﱠ
ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻣﺼﺎﺭ ،ﻓﻮﺍﻓﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺇ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺇ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻄ ﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺗﻮﻗﲑﻩ ،ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﻦ ﰲ
ﺇ ﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻓﺼﱠﻨ ﻋﻘﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ :ﲢﻘﻴ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ؛ ﺃﻭﺩ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ،ﻭﺑﺮﺍﻫﲔ ﺻﻮﺍﺑﻪ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻠ ﺺ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺮ ؛ ﻭﻻﺑﺪ ﱄ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗﻔﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﺎ ﻭ ﻴﻘﺎ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ؛
ﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﻨ ﺗﺘﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﻓﻘﺪ ُﻧ ِ
5
ﻭﻻ ﺗﺨﻄﻪ ﺑﻴﻤﻴﻨ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻻﺭﺗﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﻄﻠﻮ [ .
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻫ ُﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺣﺬﺍ ﺑﻨﻘﻤﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ ﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻞ ﻋﻨـﺪﻩ؛ ﻭﻣـﻦ
ﻫ ﻻﺀ ﺍ ﻟﻮﺳﻲ؛ ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻭﺃﻧ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ُﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮ ،ﻻ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺇﻻ
6
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺠﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟ ﺎﻥ ِﻣ ﱠﻤﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺠﻴﺘﻪ".
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﻜﺮﻩ ﺍ ﻟﻮﺳﻲ ،ﻭﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﻓـﻲ ﺩﻋﻮ ﺍﻟﱠﺘﻤﺴﻚ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻘ ﱠﺪﻣﻪ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ
1ـ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺪﻟ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﻠﻨﺴﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺷﺮﻗﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻫﻠﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺃﻗﺮﺃ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ .
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳊﻤﻮﻱ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ).(494/2
2ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍ ﻐﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻋﻤﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 4251ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟـﺴﲑ ،ﺑـﺎﺏ
ﺻﻠﺢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺒﻴﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1783ﻛﻼ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺍﻟ ﺍﺀ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺯﺏ.
3ـ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺑﻼﺯﻡ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﻟﻴ ﻨﻬ ﺳﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺇ ﻼ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻠﺔ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﺎ :ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺼﺎﻡ ) ،(413/2ﺍ ﻘﺮﻱ :ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ
) ،(348/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ :ﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭ ) 178/5)(121/20ﻭ ،(284ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ :ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﺻﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﺻﻢ ).(368/4
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(805/2ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻫﻨﺪ.
5ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻜﺒﻮ .48 :
6ـ ﺍ ﻟﻮﺳﻲ :ﺭﻭ ﺍ ﻌﺎ ).(5/21
11
ﺗﺄ ﱠﺧﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ 1،ﻏﲑ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻭﺑﺘﺪﺑﺮ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ؛ ﻧﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﺘ ﺋﺔ ﺳﺎﺣﺘﻪ ﳑﱠﺎ ﻏﻤِﺰ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺗﺄﻣﱠﻞ ﻣﻌﻲ ﻭﺟـﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺔ؛ ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ..." :ﻓﺎﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺇﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻞ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺧﻄﻪ ﺑﻴﻤﻴﻨﻪ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻔﻲ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﺎ ﺗﻼﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻓﻴـﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ ﻭﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺒﻴﲔ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻭﺍ ﺮﺳﻠﲔ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺇ ﻬﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻌﺠﺰﺍ ﻭﺗﺒﻴﲔ ﺍ ﻳﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ
2
ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻔﻲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﺘﺐ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ".
ﻓﻤ ﺼﻮﻝ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ؛ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻟ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍ ﻳﺔ؛ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻧﺰﻭﻝ ﺍﻟـﻮﺣﻲ،
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺒﺘ ﺗﻼﻭﺗﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭ ﻳﻘﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﻮ ﺎ ﻣﻌﺠﺰﺓ ،ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﺔ؛ ﻟﺜﺒـﻮ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﰲ
ﺣﺪﻳ ﺍ ﻘﺎﺿﺎﺓ.
ﺇﺫﻥ؛ ﻓﺎﻟﺴﺮ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣـﻊ ﺭﺃﻳـﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻥ
ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺠ ﱠﻮﺯ؛ ﺃﻱ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻬﲔ ،ﻭُﻳ ﻜﻢ ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺮ ﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﻟـﺔ
ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺎ ﻮﻩ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ؛ 3ﻭﻟﻌﻠﻪ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ
ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ﰲ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ؛ ﺗ ﱠﺮﺟﺢ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ؛ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻀﻴ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮﺿﻊ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﺪﻋﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺳﺒﻘﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍ ﺮﻭﻱ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﻨﺎ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻄ ﻪ ﺗﻀﻠﻴﻠﻪ ،ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻜﻔﲑﻩ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﻓﺔ " :ﺍﳊ ﺃﻧﱠـﻪ
4
ﻳﻜﺘﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﱠﻧﻪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﻛﻔﺮﺍ ﻭﻻ ﻓﺴﻘﺎ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻓﻼ ﻣﻌ ﻟﻠﺘﺸﻨﻴﻊ".
،42ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻷﺟﻔﺎﻥ :ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ، 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ) ،(503/7ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﻱ :ﺃﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ،ε
،85ﺳﻠﻤﺎﻥ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻭ ﺎﺭﻩ.200 ،
2ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﲢﻘﻴ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ.233 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﺬﻳﻞ ﲢﻘﻴ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ.303 ،
4ـ ﺍﻷ :ﺇﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺇﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻢ ).(124/5
12
ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻟﻜﻔ ؛ ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ " :ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫـﺎﺏ ﻣﺜـﻞ ﺃ
1
ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ـ ﺭ ﻪ ﺍﷲ ـ".
ﻭ ﱠﳑﺎ ﺃ ﺮ ﰲ ﻓﻀﻠﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﻜﺮﺓ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﻓﻘﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﺑﻨﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ،ﻓﺴﺎﺭ ﺑـﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺷﻲ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ " :ـ ﺃﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻋ ﱠﺰﻙ ـ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺷﻴ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،
2
ﻓﻘﻠ :ﻧﻌﻢ؛ ﻓﺄﻗﺒﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ".
ﻭﺳ ﻞ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﳉﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻓﺄﺟﺎﺏ..." :ﻭﻫ ﻻﺀ ﺍﻟـﺬﻳﻦ
ﻴ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ؛ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺧﲑ ﻭﻫﺪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﳚﺐ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻢ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻣﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺑﻄﻠـﻮﺍ
ﺷﺒﻪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﻳ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻼﻟﺔ 3،"...ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﻲ ﺗﺘﺒﻌ ﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻟﻄﺎﻝ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺍ ﻘﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺫﻛـﺮ
ﻭﻓﺎﺀ ﺑﺎ ﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ.
ﻏﲑ ﺃﻧﻲ ﺃﻫﺘﺒﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻘﺎﻡ ﻷﻭﺿﺢ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﻟﻄﺎ ﺎ ﺃﺷﲑ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻟﻜﱠﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻞ ﺣ ﻬﺎ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴـﺎﻥ
ﻭﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎ ،ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻲ ﲢﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﺣ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻘﺮﻱ 4ﺃﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎ ـﺮ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ " :ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ :ﺣﺬﺭ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺎﺻ ﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ،ﻭﲢﻤﻴﻼ ﺍﻟـﺸﻴﻮ ،ﻭ ﺮﳚـﺎ
ﺍ ﺘﻔﻘﻬﲔ ،ﻭ ﺇ ﺎﻋﺎ ﺍ ﺪ ﲔ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ :ﺍﺣﺬﺭ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳ ﻋﺒـﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫـﺎﺏ ...ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻤـﺎﻻ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﺍﻟﻠ ﻤﻲ 5،ﻭﻗﻴﻞ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎ ﺣ ﺃﺩﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒـﺎﺟﻲ ﺘﻤـﻞ
6
ﻭ ﺘﻤﻞ ،ﺟﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠ ﻤﻲ ﻓﻌ ﱠﺪ ﻴﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ."...
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺭﺍﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺬﻳﺮ ،ﻻ ﻤﻞ ﰲ ﻨﺎﻳﺎﻩ ﻣﻄﻌﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻨـﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻫـﺬﻩ
ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺘﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﻓ ﺴﺐ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍ ﻌﺘﻤـﺪ ﰲ
ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻦ ﺗﻮ ﱠﻫﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺎﻟﻠ ﻤﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻼﻟﺔ ﻗﺪﺭﻩ.
ﻭﻳ ﻛﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻪ؛ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻲ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ..." :ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺎ ﺮ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﺃﻭﺭﺩﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨ ﲑ ،ﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺣ ﺃﻋﻴﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺫ ﱠﻡ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(803/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺴﺎﻡ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(96/1-2ﻠﻮ :ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ).(178/1
2ـ ﺍ ﻘﺮﻱ :ﻧﻔﺢ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ).(67/2
3ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﻓﺘﺎﻭ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ) 804/2ﻭ.(944
4ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ ،ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷ ﺒﺎ ﰲ ﻓﻘﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ﺳﻨﺔ 759ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﺮﺣﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺒﺎﺝ ، 288 ،ﻠﻮ :ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﻴﺔ ).(334/1
5ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻌﻲ ،ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺧﺎﻟ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳـﻨﺔ
478ﻫـ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(797/2ﻠﻮ :ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ).(173/1
6ـ ﺍ ﻘﺮﻱ :ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ).(349/1
13
ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺒﻠ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃ ﱠﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻱ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺘﺒﻴﲔ ﻣﻨﻬ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ
ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺮﻳ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ ،ﻓﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨ ـﺮ
ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳ ﺩﻱ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻓﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﺘﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺧﻼﻓﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻧﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ
1
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﺠﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺿ ﱠﻤﻨﺘﻪ ﻛﺘﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺳﻠﻤﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﻮﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ."...
ﺇﺫﻥ ،ﻓﻜﻼﻣﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻔﺼﺢ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺼﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻳ ﻛﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺭﺟﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣـﻪ؛ ﻓﻘـﺪ
ﺳ ﻞ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﻓﺔ ﻫﻞ ﻟﻠﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺮﻳ ﻣﻦ ﺮ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﻳﻔـ ﺑـﻪ،
ﻓﺄﺟﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﳉﻮﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﱠﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺸﺮﻭ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ُﺧ ِﺮﻡ ﺷﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﳚﺰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻪ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺰﻭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱄ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﺘﻘ ﱠﺪﻡ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺏ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﻓﺔ ﺩﻟـ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺑﻌـﺾ
2
ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ.
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻼﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺘ ـﺬﻳﺮ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻﺗﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟ ﻦ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
1ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻣﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍ ﻠﻚ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻤﻲ ،ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟﺴﻴﲔ ﰲ ﺯﻣﻨﻪ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 238ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ،162 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﺮﺣﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺒﺎﺝ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ.154 ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ :ﺍ ﻘﺪﻣﺔ.450 ،
3ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺜﻲ ،ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻲ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣ ﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 331ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ،166 ،ﺳﻌﺪ :ﻬﺮﺓ ﺗﺮﺍﺟﻢ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .(886/2) 853
4ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳ ﺎ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﻌﺮ ﺑﺎﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻲ ،ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﰲ ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 355ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(293/2ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ .155 ،
5ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﻻﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﺍ ،ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻟﻴﻔﻪ :ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 269ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ، (72/2ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ.154 ،
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍ ) 130/2ﻭ ،(143ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻌﻮﻧﺔ ) (216/3ﻭ) (222/5ﻭ) (168/7ﻭ) ،(11/8ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻘﲔ
) ،(283/1ﻭﻣﻦ ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ) ،(283/1ﻭﺭﺟﻮﻋﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺮﺟﻴ ﺎﺗﻪ ) (284/1ﻭ).(220/2
7ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳ ﺎ ﺇ ﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺑﻦ ﺇﺳ ﺎ ﺑﻦ ﺇ ﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻱ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎﺗﻪ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 282ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(166/2ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ.164 ،
8ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻣﻮﺭﺍ :ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻲ.192 ،
9ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﺮﺣﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺒﺎﺝ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،137 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ :ﺍ ﻘﺪﻣﺔ.450 ،
15
ـ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻷ ﺯﻳﺪ (357 ،317 ،365 ،427/1) : 1ﻭ) 42/2ﻭ ، (131ﻭﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘـﺎﺏ
ﺑﺄﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻳﻘﺘﻔﻲ ﺃ ﺮ ﺍ ﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﺍ ﺪﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺃﺳ ﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﻧﻴﲔ
2
ﰲ ﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻛﺘﺐ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﺜﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ.
ـ ﺍ ﺴﺘ ﺮﺟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳـﻤﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺘﺒـﻲ (473 ،390 ،362 ،314/1) : 3ﻭ)(214 ،106 ،84/2
ﻭ).(260 ،236 ،41/3
ﻭﺗﺴ ﱠﻤﻰ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺘﺒﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺭﺍﺀ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﻟ ﺭﻭﺍﻫﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ،ﻛﻤـﺎ
ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻟ ﺃﺩﺭﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﺀ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍ ﺮﺣﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﻭﻥ؛ ﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
4
ﺷﺎﺫﺓ ،ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﰲ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺍ ﻐﺮﺏ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻼ ﺷﺄ ﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻣ ﱠﺼﻬﺎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﳉﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﻞ ،ﻓﻌ ﱠﻢ ﻧﻔﻌﻬﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻱ
5
ﻗﺒﻞ ،ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪﻭﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺍ ﺮﺣﻮﺍ ﻭﺍﺿ ﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﻴﺐ.
ـ ﺍ ﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪﻭﺱ (426 ،402 ،319/1) : 6ﻭ) (131 ،212/2ﻭ).(192 ،19 ،6/3
ـ ﺷﺮ ﺍ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴـﺮ ﻟ ﺮﻱ ،(370 ،360/1) : 7ﺣﻴ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍ ـﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣـﻦ ﻛﺘـﺎﺏ
8
ﺍ ﺘﺼﺮ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻳﻌﻘﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻠﻲ.
ـ ﺍ ﻮﻟﺪﺍ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ.(411/1) : 9
1ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳉﻼﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻱ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍ ﻼ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 378ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) ،(605/2ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ.168 ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ).(806 /2
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ) ،(58/5ﻤﺪ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ :ﺍﺻﻄﻼ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ، 307 ،ﻫﺎﻣﺶ .8
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) 329/1ﻭ (334ﻭ).(727/2
5ـ ﺣﻴ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﺇﺳ ﺎ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻟ ﻣﻜﻲ؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ).(802/2
17
2
ﺟﺮﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻄ ﻱ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟﺴﻴﲔ ﻭﻗﺘ ﺬ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺳﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﺻﻴﻠﻲ ،1ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟ .
ﻭ ﺘﻤﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﻪ؛ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻠﺔ ﻣﻌﺘﻨﻘﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﰲ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇ ﺎ ﺻﱠﻨ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻟﻄﺎﻟﺐ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺼﺪﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻴﻞ ـ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻭﺿ ﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﻘﺪﻣﺔ ـ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﻌـ ﱠﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻬـﺎ
ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻣﺒﻠ ﻪ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺃﻫﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻓﺮﻭﻥ ﻧ ﺬ.
ــ ﺍﺣﺘﻮ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺍﺀ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻴـﻲ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﺼﱠﻨﻔﺎ ﻢ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻛـﺄ
3
ﺇﺳ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻮﻳﺰ ﻣﻨﺪﺍﺩ ،ﻭﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺜﻲ ،ﻭﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺑﻦ ﻧﺼﺮ ،ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ؛ ﻓﺒﺼﻤﺎ ﺎ ﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺳﺘﺄ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ
ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺣﺮﻓﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﺻﻠﻨﺎ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻚ ﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ! .
5ـ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻷ ﻜﺎﻡ ﻭﺑﻴﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻀﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ:
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻟﻔﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺎ ﺩﺭﺝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺓ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺍ ﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺎ ﺟﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ،ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﻝ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ﻭﺍ ﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺿﻌﻴ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻳﺘ ﻘ ﺑﻪ ﲢﺼﻴﻞ ﺍ ﺼﻠ ﺔ ﻭﺗﻜﻤﻴﻠﻬﺎ،
ﺃﻭ ﺩﺭﺀ ﺍ ﻔﺴﺪﺓ ﻭﺗﻘﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺗﻜﻤﻦ ﺃ ﱠﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ؛ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺗﻔﻌﻴﻞ ﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﻻ ﺗﻨﻜﺐ ﻋﻨـﻬﺎ؛ ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻤـﻞ
ﺑﺎ ﺮﺟﻮ ﺩﺭﺀﺍ ﻔﺴﺪﺓ ﻳﺘﻤﺎﺷﻰ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺳﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﺭﺍﺋﻊ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳉﻠﺐ ﻣﺼﻠ ﺔ؛ ﻓﻬـﻮ ﻻﻋﺘﺒـﺎﺭ
4
ﺍ ﺼﻠ ﺔ ﺍ ﺮﺳﻠﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﺸﺮﻭ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻻ ﺎﻟ ﻧﺼﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺼﻠ ﺔ ﺃﻋ ﻢ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﺟﻪ ﺃ ﻴﺘﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﺍ ﺎﺟﺮﻳﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺑـﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳـﺎ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ" :ﻭﻧﺼﻮ ﺍ ﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻣﺘﻮﺍ ﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
5
ﱠﳑﺎ ﻳﺮ ﱠﺟﺢ ﺑﻪ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺘﻠ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ﰲ ﺑﻠﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨ ﺬ ﻣﺮﺟ ﺎ".
1ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣ ﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ :ﺍﻟﺪﻻﺋﻞ ﰲ ﺃﻣﻬﺎ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳـﻨﺔ 392ﻫــ .ﺍﻧ ـﺮ:
ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ) ،(642/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﺮﺣﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺒﺎﺝ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،138 ،ﻠﻮ :ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﻴﺔ ).(150/1
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻤﻮﺩ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍ ﻴﺪ :ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ،131 ،ﺃﺑﻮ ﻏﺪﺓ :ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﲢﻘﻴ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ.7 ،
3ـ ﺍ ﻧ ﺮ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃ ﺇﺳ ﺎ ) 276/1ﻭ ،(355ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻮﻳﺰ ﻣﻨـﺪﺍﺩ )(467 ،321 ،275 ،229 ،214 ،193/1
ﻭ) ،(649 ،521/2ﻭﺃ ﺍﻟﻔــﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺜــﻲ ) (355 ،264 ،206 ،204 ،199/1ﻭ) ،(553 ،521/2ﻭﺍﻷ ــﺮﻱ
ـﺎﺏ ) (309 ،255 ،200 ،179/1ﻭ)،519/2 ـﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫـ) (488 ،355 ،316 ،259 ،204/1ﻭ) ،(553/2ﻭﻋﺒـ
،(727 ،681 ،649ﻭﺃ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﻢ ) ،(355/1ﻭﺃ ﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒـﺼﺮﻱ ) (255 ،210 ،201/1ﻭ)،628 ،521/2
،(713ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻨﺘﺎﺏ ).(316 ،246 ،204/1
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﻴﺪﻱ :ﺃ ﺮ ﻋﻴﺎ ﰲ ﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎ .10 ،
5ـ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺃ ﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺎﺭﻱ؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﺮﺣﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ ).(69/1
18
1
ﺼﱠﻨﻔﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻬﺎ .
ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒ ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﱠﻌﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣ ﱠ
6ـ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﳊ ﺎﺝ:
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃ ﱠﻭﻝ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ُﺩﺷﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻦ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﻭﺍ ﻨﺎ ﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍ ﻐﺮﺏ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻗﺎ ﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ
ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﺎ ﻪ ﺍ ﺸﺮﻗﻴﲔ ﺟﻠﱠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺼﱠﻨ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺳ ﱠ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻣﺮﺓ 2،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ
ﺘﻠ ﰲ ﺗﺒﻮﻳﺒﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ،ﻣﻊ ﺗﻨﻮ ﰲ ﻣﺎﺩﺗﻪ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺩﺳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻟﻴﺔ،
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺗﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ.
7ـ ﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ:
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻨﺎ ﺮﺍﺗﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺩﻟ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺗﺼﺮ ﺎ ﻣـﻦ ﻭﻗﻔـﻮﺍ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ 3،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻔﻘﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﻮﺭ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
4
ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ...":ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ."...
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﻭﺍ ﻘﺘﻀﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺑﺄ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ؛ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ـﻼﺀ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺣﻘﻴ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﻓﺘﺢ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﳊ ﻭﺃﻧ ﺧﲑ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﲢﲔ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ ﻣﺜﻼ :ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ،ﺗـ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻷﺟﻔﺎﻥ ،212 ،170 ،183 ،139 ،120 ،208 ،ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺗﺮﻛﻲ :ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﲢﻘﻴ ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ ،28 ،ﻫﺎﻣﺶ .1
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍ ﺪﺍﺭﻙ ) 805/2ﻭ ،(809ﺍﻟﺬﻫ :ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ) 558/17ﻭ ،(629ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﺮﺣﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺒﺎﺝ
ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ.122 ،
4ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(463/9
19
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﻪ
ﺳﺄﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﻪ؛ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻓﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻩ؛ ﻭﺳﻴﺘﺸ ﱠﻌﺐ ﺑِﻨﺎ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺘﲔ؛ ﺃﻭﻻ ﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻳ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ،ﺃﺑﻴ ُﻦ ﻋﻘﺒﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻠ ﺍﳉـﺰﺋﻴﺘﲔ،
ﺴﻨﻦ ﰲ ﻣﺒ ـ ﺍﻷﻧـﻮﺍ ،ﳊﻜﻤـﺔ ﻣ ﺯﺍ ﻧﻘﺎ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺳﺄﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺳﺘ ﻬﺮ ﻻﺣﻘﺎ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ) ،(399/1ﻣﺎﺩﺓ :ﺩﻝ ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻨ ﻮﺭ :ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌـﺮﺏ ) ،(1414/2ﻣـﺎﺩﺓ :ﺩﻝ ﻝ،
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ :ﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎ ،140 ،ﻣﺎﺩﺓ :ﺩﻟﻞ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(13/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ ) ،(52/1ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﻧﻮﻱ :ﻛﺸﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻨـﻮﻥ
) (292/2ﻣﺎﺩﺓ :ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.21 ،
3ـ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺑﺎ ﺎﺻﺔ ،ﻛﻘﻮﻟﻨﺎ :ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺣﻚ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺎﻗﺼﺎ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎ :ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎ ،91 ،ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﺩﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺒ ﻭﺍ ﻨﺎ ﺮﺓ.40 ،
20
ﻟﻜﻦ ،ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻟﻔ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺧﻼ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ؛ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ
ﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻗﻴﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑ ﺑﻘﻮ ﻢ" :ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﺻﱠﻞ ﺑﺼ ﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﺮ ﻓﻴـﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠـﻢ
ﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺧ ﻱ".
ﻭﻣﺮﺍﺩﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺼﻮ ﺎ ﺃﻓﻀﻰ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻻ ﺑﺎﻟ ﻦ؛ ﻭﻣـﺎ ﺃﻓـﺎﺩ
ﺑﺎﻟ ﻦ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻣﺎﺭﺓ ﻻ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻱ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺘﻜﻠﻤﲔ 1،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣـﺬﻫﺐ
ﻣﺮﺟﻮ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻻ ﺗُﻔﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟ ﻦﱠ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﻴـ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻲ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻟ ﻨﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟ ﻨﻲ ،ﻭﻛﻼ ﺎ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻧﻮﻋـﻪ،
2
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ؛ ﻭﻳﺪﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻤﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻨﻲ.
2ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ:
ﺃ ــ ﻟ ﺔ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻨ ﻮﺭ" :ﻭﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺍ ﺎ ﺒﺔ :ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺧﺎ ﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺎ ﺒﺔ
3
ﻭﺧﻄﺎﺑﺎ ،ﻭ ﺎ ﻳﺘ ﺎ ﺒﺎﻥ".
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﺮﻳ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻲ ﻟﻠ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ، ﺏ ـ ﺍﺻﻄﻼ ﺎ :ﺃﻗ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺒ
ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎ ﺍﻻﺻﻄﻼﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟ ﻋُﻨﻴ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ُﺗ ﺎﻛﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻱ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ ﺑﺄﻧﱠﻪ:
4
"ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺍ ﺎ ﺐُ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻴ ﺎ".
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﻳﻨﻔﻌﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻘﺎﻡ ،ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺘﻠ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ
ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ ،ﻓﻤﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺸﻤﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﻭﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎﺱ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﺼﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺩﻭﺍﻟﻴﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺘﺄ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ .
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺘـﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﻗﻔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﺼﻄﻠ ﺎ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻋ ﱠﺮ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ " :ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺇﻓﻬﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻬﻴ ﻟﻠﻔﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﻮ ﻢ ﺧﻄـﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﺃﻱ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺍ ﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻬﻴ ﻟﻠﻔﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍ ﻜﻠ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻗﻞ" 5،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻓ ﺇﱃ
ﺣﺪ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻪ ،ﻓﺎﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻨﻌﻤﺘﻪ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﺎ .
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻱ :ﺍ ﻌﺘﻤﺪ ) ،(5/1ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ ،33 ،ﻝ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ :ﺍ ﺴﻮﺩﺓ ).(1001/2
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ 33 ،ﻭﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ ) ،(156/1ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ) ،(132/1ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺮﻗﻨﺪﻱ :ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻝ،
،71ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(13/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ ) ،(53/1ﺧﻼ :ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ.21 ،
3ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻨ ﻮﺭ :ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ) ،(1194/2ﻣﺎﺩﺓ :ﺧﻄﺐ.
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻨﺎﻭﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻴ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻳ .316 ،
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻗﻄﺐ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺳﺎﻧﻮ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﻣﺼﻄﻠ ﺎ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ.197 ،
21
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻟﻘﺒﺎ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﻴ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﲔ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ؛ ﻷﻣﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺿﻮﺋﻬﺎ ﺃﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺭ.
1ـ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ :ﻋﺮﱠﻓﻪ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ 1ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺜﺒ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﻠـﻰ
2
ﺧﻼ ﻣﺎ ﺒ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ".
3
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻤﺎﻡ" :ﻫﻮ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﻴﺾ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻜﻮ ".
2ـ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ :ﻋﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ـ ﻭﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ُﺟﺰﻱ ـ ﺑﺄﻧﱠﻪ " :ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﻧﻘﻴﺾ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﺑﻪ
4
ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ".
5
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ﻫﻮ " :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺎﻟﻔﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺇ ﺒﺎﺗﺎ ﻭﻧﻔﻴﺎ ".
6
3ـ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﻮﺭﻙ " :ﻫﻮ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻩ".
ﺼﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺎﻟ
ﺼﱠﻭﻋ ﱠﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﳉﻮﻳ ﺑﺄﱠﻧﻪ" :ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﱠ
7
ﻟﻠﻤ ﺼﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ".
ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ 4ـ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ :ﻋ ﱠﺮﻓﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﺑﺄﻥ " ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ـﺎﻟ ﺣﻜـﻢ ﺍ ﻨـﺼﻮ
8
ﺑ ﺎﻫﺮﻩ".
9
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ " :ﻭﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﻴﻪ ﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻩ".
ﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﺮﻳ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻏﺎﻳﺔ 5ــ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮﻳﺔ :ﺃﻗ
10
ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻠﻮﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺎﻟﻔﻴﻬﻢ.
1ـ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﺍ ﺒﻮ ،ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺣﻨﻔﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻣ ﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ :ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 747ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﻱ :ﻫﺪﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻓﲔ ) ،(649/1ﻛ ﺎﻟﺔ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺍ ﻟﻔﲔ ).(355/2
2ـ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ :ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﻴﺢ ).(141/1
3ـ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺑﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ :ﺗﻴﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮﻳﺮ ).(98/1
4ـ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ 50 ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(64/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﺰﻱ :ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ.169 ،
5ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ :ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻬﻰ ).(173/2
6ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﻮﺭﻙ :ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ.441 ،
7ـ ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(166/1
8ـ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(449/2
9ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ.235 ،
10ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ).(323/2
22
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧ ﺮﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻳ ،ﺃﺩﺭﻛﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺳﻠﻜﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺮﺍﺋ ﺷ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻨﺎ
ﺑﺈﻣﻌﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﺮ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎ ﻢ ،ﺃﻟﻔﻴﻨﺎﻫﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺳﻠﻜﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﻠﻜﲔ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﲔ؛ ﺃ ﱠﻭ ﻤﺎ ﺣ ﱠﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻄﻠ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻜﻮ ،ﻭُﻳﻤﺜﻠﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻢ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻧﱠﺒﻪ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷ ﻴﺔ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﻢ ﻗﱠﻴﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺑﺘﻮﺿﻴﺢ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻋ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺎﻟ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﲢﻘ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ُﺑِﻨﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﺑﻪ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ 1،ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴ ﻳُﻠﻐﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﻌﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ
ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭُﻳﻤﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮُﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﻳ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺪﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ،
2
ﻭﻻ ﻔﻰ ﺗﺄ ﺮﻩ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻓﺎﺩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻜﲔ ،ﻓﻌ ﱠﺮ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻫﻮ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﳊﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﻗﻴﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴـﻮﺩ ﺍ ﻌﺘـ ﺓ ﰲ ﻫـﺬﺍ
3
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ".
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﻣﺘﲔ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳ ﻞ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﺻﺮﺍ؛ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺣﺪﱠﻩ ﺑﻠﻔ ﺍ ﻨﺎﻗﻀﺔ
ﺑﺪﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﺩ ﱠ ،ﻭﺳﻴﺄ ﻣﺰﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ
ﻳﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺮﻛﺒﺎ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﻴﺎ ،ﻓﻤﻦ
ﺴﻤﺎ .ﺣﻴ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺗﺒ ُﻌ ُﺪ ﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ﻟﻐﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺼﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺼﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺍﻻﺻﻄﻼﺣﻲ؛ ﻓﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴ ﺃﻗ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﺮﻳ ﻟﻠـ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﻓﻘ ،ﺣﻴ ﺣﺪﱠﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻣﺎ ﺻ ﱠﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺷﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻮﺏ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟ ﻫـﺎﻥ
ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﺎﻥ" 4،ﻭﻋﺮﱠﻓﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻣﺎ ﺻ ﱠﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺷﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻄﻠـﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋـﺐ ﻋـﻦ
ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ" 5،ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻄﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﺎ ﺻ ﱠﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺷﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻮﺏ؛ ﺗﺄ ﺮﻩ ﻓﻴﻪ ـﺎﻫﺮ
6
ﺑﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ ﻭﺷﺮﺣﻬﺎ.
1ـ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ 84 ،ﻭ .108ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻮﺫﺍ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ )، (223/2
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍ ﺼﻮﻝ ).(148/2
2
ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ.84 :
3ـ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ،50 ،ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ ﻟﻠﺘﻮﺳﻊ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) ،(1392/3ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ) ،(70/2ﺍﺑـﻦ ﺍﻟﻌـﺮ :
ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ).(992/2
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻨ ﻮﺭ :ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ) ،(1240 -1239/2ﻣﺎﺩﺓ :ﺧﻠ .
5ـ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺣﺪﱠﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﻮﺭﻙ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻘﻠﻲ..." :ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺘﲔ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ،ﺃﻻ ﺗﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﻮﻥ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺩ ﰲ ﻭﻗ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎ ﰲ ﻭﻗ ﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻼ
ﻳﺘﻀﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺎ ﰲ ﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﰲ ﻭﻗ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ."...
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺼﻘﻠﻲ :ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊ ﺍﻟﺼﻘﻠﻲ ﺑﺬﻳﻞ ﲢﻘﻴ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ، 296 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﻮﺭﻙ :ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ.93 ،
25
ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻴﻀﲔ ﻻ ﳚﺘﻤﻌﺎﻥ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻌﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺍﻟﻀﺪﻳﻦ ﻻ ﳚﺘﻤﻌﺎﻥ ﻭﻟﻜـﻦ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻌـﺎﻥ
1
ﺴﻮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎ ".
ﻛﺎﻟ ﱠ
ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺑﺎ ﻨﺎﻗﻀﺔ ﻭﺟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﺯﻣـﺮﺓ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺍ ﺘـﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ؛
2
ﻛﺎﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ.
،137ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜـﺮ 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ:ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ 49 ،ﻭ ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(49/1ﺍ ﺸﺎ :ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﻴﻨﺔ،
ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ) ،(107/1ﺭﺍﺟﺢ :ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.67 ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ.49 ،
3ـ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺍ ﺸﺎ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣ ﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ :ﺍﻟﺘ ﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺭ ﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﻴﻨﻴﺔ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 1399ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ :ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﲢﻘﻴ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﻴﻨﺔ.57 ،
4ـ ﺍ ﺸﺎ :ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﻴﻨﺔ ،137 ،ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻹﺳﻨﻮﻱ :ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻝ ).(205/2
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟﺘﻠ ﻴﺺ ) ،(183/2ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(47/3ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ).(124/5
ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ ﻟﻠﺜﺎ :ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ) ،(317/1ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ، 302 ،ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ :ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ).(90/1
ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ ﻟﻠﺜﺎﻟ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،104 ،ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ.49 ،
6ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﺃ ﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣ ﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ :ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 518ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳊﺴﻴ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ،201 ،ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻪ ﻭﺭﺟﺎﻟﻪ.198 ،
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ :ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ).(335/1
8ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ) ،(166/1ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ) ،(480/2ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ.104 ،
9ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ :ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ).(335/1
27
ﻭ ﻬﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻓﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﺍ ﺄ ﻛﻠﻤﺘﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺇ ﻼ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺻﻄﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ؛ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ..." :ﻭﻓ ﻮ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ،ﺗﻘﻮﻝ :ﻓﻬﻤ ﻣﻦ ﻓ ﻮ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻛـﺬﺍ
1
ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ،ﻓﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ."...
8ـ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻄ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻟﻔﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ؛ ﻭﺃ ﱠﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﱃ ﻫـﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺑﺈﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﺎﺑﺮﺓ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﰲ ُﻋﺪﱠﺗﻪ 2،ﻭﺷ ﱠﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻓﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻋـ ﱠﺪﺓ
ﻣﻮﺍ ﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻭﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻘ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻄ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﻣـﺴﻘﻄﺎ
3
ﻟﻠﻤﻨﻄﻮ ﺑﻪ".
ﻭﻫﻲ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘـﻲ ﺳﻴﺄ ﲢﺮﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ:
ﻷ ﱠﻭﻝ ﻭﻫﻠﺔ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄـﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺇ ـﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭ ﺼﱠﻨﻔﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻳﻠ
ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹ ﻼﻗﺎ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻟﻐﲑﻩ.
ﻭﻟﻴ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺪﻋﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺴ ،ﻓﻼ ﻏﺮﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘـﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ
ﻨﺎﻳﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ؛ 4ﺍﻟ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺃﻗﺪﻡ ﻣﺼﺪﺭ ــ ﱠﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﲢ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﺍ ﻥ ــ ﰲ ﺃﺻـﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻲ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﺎ ُﺗﻮ ﻪ ﺎﻫﺮ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨ ﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘـﻲ ﻣﻔﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﻮﺭﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﱠﻭﻝ
ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﻠ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑ ﱠﺪﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﻮﺭﻙ ﻟﻔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺑـﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄـﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ؛ ﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻨ ﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ " 5،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﺳﺘ ﺜﺎﺭ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻹ ﻼ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺷـﺎﺭﻛﻬﻢ
6
ﻓﻴﻪ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ .
1ـ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ،50 ،ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(285/3ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟـﺔ )،(236/1
ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(47/3ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(124/5ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.302 ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ).(472/2
3ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(272/3ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ.(279 ،277 ،272 ،269 /3) :
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺭ :ﺍ ﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ.81 ،
5ـ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﻨ ﻮﻝ.209 ،
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(323/2ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻱ :ﺍ ﻌﺘﻤﺪ ) ،(153/1ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ ،218 ،ﺍﻹﺳﻨﻮﻱ :ﺎﻳـﺔ
ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻝ ) ،(197/2ﺃﻣﲑ ﺑﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ :ﺗﻴﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮﻳﺮ ) ،(98/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(1065/3
28
ﺑﻘﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺔ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺼﺢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ..." :ﻭﺇﻧﻤـﺎ ـﻲ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻨ ﺩﻻﻻ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﺃﻭ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺩﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﺎﻟﻔﺘـﻪ ﻣﻨ ـﻮﻡ
1
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ".
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﰲ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻻ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻳ ﺧﺮﻩ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗـﺎﻝ
2
ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ... " :ﻭﺭ ﺎ ُﺳﻤﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻣﻲ".
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺭﺻﲔ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌ ﺓ ﺑﺎ ﺴﻤﻴﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺎﻷ ﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻻ ﻣﺸﺎ ﱠﺣﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺻﻄﻼ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋُـ ِﺮ
ﺍ ﻌﻨـﻲ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻌﺎ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ،ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻲ ﻻ ﻟﻐﻮﻱ 3،ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ
ﻛﻞ ﺃﺻﻮﱄ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺎ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺍﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎ ﺍﻟﺘـﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺻـﻄﻼﺣﻴﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻱ.
ﻭﻟﻠﻌﻠﻮﻱ 4ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﺪﻳﻊ ﺃﺳﻮﻗﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮ ﻦ ﻟﻨﻔﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﻭﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻮﺏ ،ﺣﻴـ ﻗـﺎﻝ:
"ﺍ ﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻟﻴﺴ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍ ﻘﻘﲔ ،ﻭﺭ ﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺍ ﺼﻠﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻼﺀ ﺑﺪﻝ
ﺍ ﻘﻘﲔ ،ﺑﻞ ﺷﺄ ﻢ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺎﻣﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴ ﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺸﺘﻐﻠﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﻌﻴـﺔ؛ ﺗـﺪﺭﻳﺒﺎ
5
ﻟﻠﻤﺘﻌﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻭﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩﺍ ﻟﻠﻄﺎﻟﺒﲔ".
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻨ ﺃﺭ ﺃﻭﻟﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺴﻤﻴ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄـﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒ ـﻮ
ﺃﻗ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺍ ﻠﻌ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ؛ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺸﻴﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎ ﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺩ ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﺻﻄﻠﺢ ﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻼ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺎ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍ ﺴﺘ ـﺴﻦ
ﲡﻨﺐ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺘﲔ ﺩﻓﻌﺎ ﻟﻼﻟﺘﺒﺎﺱ ،ﺇﻻ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ ) ،(489/3ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(132/5ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ،
.303
2ـ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ.265 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ.50 ،
4ـ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ ،ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻲ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 1230ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﻱ :ﻫﺪﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻓﲔ ) ،(491/1ﻛ ﺎﻟﺔ :ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺍ ﻟﻔﲔ ).(220/2
5ـ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ :ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ).(87/1
29
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ:
.307 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ ) ،(505/3ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ،
2ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ.283 :
3ـ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺎﻫﺪ؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ :ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ﺍﻟﻌ ﻴﻢ ) ،(260/1ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ..." :ﻭﻛﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤـﺎﺀ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺩ ﺫﻟﻚ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻓﺎ ﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ εﺍﺑﺘﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊـﻀﺮ
ﻭﺭﻫﻦ ﻭ ﻳﻜﺘﺐ ."..ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ).(260/1
4ـ ﺍ ﻦ :ﺃ ﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ.173 ،
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ).(250/1
6ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ.43 :
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ :ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ.422 ،
8ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(44/2ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ).(177/5
ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﻪ ،ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩ ﻣﺎﻻ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 1792ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺃﻡ ﺍ ﻣﻨﲔ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ.
ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﻠﻌﻲ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﺇﺳﻨﺎﺩﻩ ﺣﺎﺭ ﺔ ﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺿﻌﻴ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻧﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻳﺔ ).(330/2
31
1
1ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ" :ﻫﻮ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍ ﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺼﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭ ﺒﻮ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪ ﻟﻪ".
ﻛـﺒﲑ ﰲ 2ـ ﺻﻴ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﻭﺃﻣ ﻠﺘﻪ :ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮ ﺑﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺻﻴﻐﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺣـﺼﻞ ﺧـﻼ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ؛ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣ ﻟﻔﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ؛ ﻓﻮﺟﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﺮﺑﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺴﺔ ﻋـﺸﺮ
2
ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ،ﻭﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻊ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺜﺎ.
ﻭﺳﺄﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻴ ﺍﻟ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ:
ﺃ ـ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﻋﻠ ﺇﻻ :ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻴ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹ ـﻼ ،ﻭﻣﺜﺎ ـﺎ
3
ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ :ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ.
ﺏ ــ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﺑ ﻧﻤﺎ :ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨ " :ρﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺀ ﻦ ﺃﻋﺘـ " ؛ 4ﺍﻟـﺬﻱ ﺩﻝ
5
ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺀ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻻ ﻦ ﺃﻋﺘ .
ﺝ ـ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺼﺮ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﰲ ﺍﳋ ﺑ ﻳﻜﻮ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻼﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ:
ــ ﻓﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺍ ﻌﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻼﻡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﺍﻟﻮﻟﺪ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺍ ﻭﻟﻠﻌﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳊﺠﺮ" ؛ 6ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺃﺻـﻞ ﰲ
ﺇﳊﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﺪ ﺑﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺮﺃ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺀ ﺮﻡ 7،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺩﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺣﺼﺮ ﺍ ﺒﺘـﺪﺃ
ﰲ ﺍ ﺍ ﻌ ﱠﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻼﻡ.
ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ؛ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨ " :ρﺫﻛﺎﺓ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺫﻛﺎﺓ ﺃﻣﻪ" 8،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻟ ﺑﻪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ــ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍ ﻌﺮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍ ﻠﻘﺔ ﻣﻴﺘﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻛﺎﺓ ﺃﻣﻪ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻛﻠﻪ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ρﺣﺼﺮ ﺫﻛﺎﺓ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﰲ
9
ﺫﻛﺎﺓ ﺃﻣﻪ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺪﺭﺟﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻴ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺬﻛﺎﺓ ﺃﻣﻪ ﺍﻟ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺫﻛﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻛﺎﺓ ﺃﺧﺮ .
ﺣﻜـﻢ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﻮ 1ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ " :ﻫﻮ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺺ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻓﻴـﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﺼﻮ
1
ﺎﻟ ﳊﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ؛ ﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ". ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻜﻮ
2ـ ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ:
ــ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺑﺘﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻤﻢ ،ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺭُﻭﻱ ﻋﻨﻪ ρﺃﻧﱠـﻪ ﻗـﺎﻝ:
2
"ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻤﻢ ﺿﺮﺑﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺿﺮﺑﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﺿﺮﺑﺔ ﻟﻠﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﺮﻓﻘﲔ".
ﻤﻞ ﺍ ﺒ " 3،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ـ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻗﻠﺘﲔ
4
ﻣﺎﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻳﺘﻨﺠ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻞ ﺍ ﺒ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻳﺘﻐﲑ.
ــ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃ ﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘ ﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺿﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﰲ ﺇﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ؛ ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺗﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻝ
5
ﺼﺘﺎﻥ". ﺍﻟﻨ " :ρﻻ ﲢﺮﻡ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮﺿﻌﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮﺿﻌﺘﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍ ﱠ
ﺼﺔ ﻭﺍ ﱠ
ـ ﺳﺎﺩﺳﺎ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ:
1ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ" :ﻫﻮ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺟﻨ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﺍ ـﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﱠـﺎ
6
ﻋﺪﺍﻩ".
2ـ ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ:
2
ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺏ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺫﺍ ،ﻭﻻ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ِﻟﻠﻘﺐ.
ــ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘ ﺮ ،ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﺍﻟﺬﻫﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔ ﱠ
ﻀﺔ
ﻀﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟ ﺑﺎﻟ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻌﲑ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻌﲑ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻤﺮ ،ﻭﺍ ﻠﺢ ﺑﺎ ﻠﺢ ،ﻣﺜﻼ ﺜﻞ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﺴﻮﺍﺀ ،ﻳﺪﺍ ﺑﻴﺪ،
ﺑﺎﻟﻔ ﱠ
3
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎ ﻓﺒﻴﻌﻮﺍ ﻛﻴ ﺷ ﺘﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺪﺍ ﺑﻴﺪ".
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ
ـ ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ
4
1ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ :ﻫﻮ " ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﺔ ".
2ـ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴ :ﱠﳑﻦ ﻗ ﱠ
ﺴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘـﺴﻴﻢ؛ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮﺍﰲ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛـﺸﻲ
5
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ ،ﻭﺗﺒﻌﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ.
3ـ ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ:
ــ ﺳ ﻞ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ τﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺫ 6،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﺳﺒ ﱠﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺫ ؛ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺃﺳﻜﺮ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ" 7،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ
ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﻣﺔ ﺑﻌﻠﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﺎﺭ؛ ﻓﻴﻨﺘﻔﻲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻬﺎ.
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺟﺪ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،522ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺣﺬﻳﻔﺔ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) ،(1393/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺋﺪ ،514 ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻳﻨﺎﺯﻋﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭ ﻢ
ﻋﺪﺓ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎ ؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(151/5ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ).(334/1
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،270 ،ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ).(50/2
ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻣ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻗﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﺮ ﻭﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺭ ﻧﻘﺪﺍ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .1586
4ـ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(163/5ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.307 ،
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) (1391/3ﻭﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(64/1ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(163/5ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،307 ،ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﻲ :ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ،202 ،ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ) (110/1ﻭﺍ ﺬﻛﺮﺓ.238 ،
6ـ ﺑﻔﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﻝ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﺮﺑﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﲑ ﺍ ﻄﺒﻮ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﻴﺎ :ﻣﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ) ،(110/1ﻣﺎﺩﺓ :ﺏ ﺫ .
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ).(1391/3
ﻭﺍﻷ ﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺷﺮﺑﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺫ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻰ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺴﻜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﺮﺑﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .5598
35
1
ــ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨ " : ρﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻴﺘﻜﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺩﺧﺎﺭ ﳊﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺿﺎﺣﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﺍﻓـﺔ "،
ﻭﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﺍﻓﺔ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻓﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺀ ،ﻓﻴﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺩﺧﺎﺭ ﳊﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺿﺎﺣﻲ ﻣُﻠﻐﻰ
2
ﺣﲔ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻓﺪﻳﻦ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﺔ ﺍ ﻨﻊ.
1ـ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻪ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺿﺎﺣﻲ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻳ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﳊﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺿﺎﺣﻲ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ، 5570ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺿـﺎﺣﻲ،
ﺑﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻛﻞ ﳊﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺿﺎﺣﻲ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1971ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺃﻡ ﺍ ﻣﻨﲔ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﺴﻠﻢ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﻮ ﻲ :ﻣﺒﺎﺣ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ.83 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) ،(1391/3ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(175/5ﺍﺑـﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤـﺴﺎ :ﺷـﺮ ﺍ ﻌـﺎ
) ،(287/1ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،310 ،ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ :ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ) ،(96/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺎﺩﻳ :ﻣﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ.30 ،
4ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ.197 :
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(175/5ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(204/3ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،310 ،ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ :ﺷﺮ ﺍ ﻌﺎ ) ،(310/1ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎ :ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،246 ،ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ).(110/1
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) (1391/3ﻭﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(63/1ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(176/5ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،310 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺎﺩﻳ :ﻣﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،30 ،ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ).(110/1
7ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ.108 :
8ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﻮ ﻲ :ﻣﺒﺎﺣ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ.83 ،
36
1
1ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ :ﻫﻮ " ﺗﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﳊﺎﻝ".
2ــ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴ :ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ ،ﻭﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛـﺮﻩ
3
ُﺳﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ 2ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻓﻮﺭﻙ".
3ــ ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ :ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ] :Ιﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻣ ﻣﻨﺎ ﻄ ﻓﺘﺤﺮﻳﺮ ﺭﻗﺒﺔ ﻣ ﻣﻨﺔ 4،[...ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﱠـﻪ ﻻ
5
ﻛﻔﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺗﻞ ﻋﻤﺪﺍ.
ﺎﻣﺴﺎ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘ ﻨﺎﺀ ـ
ﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﺼﻮﺭﺓ ،ﺩﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ 1ــ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ" :ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺫﻭ ﺻﻴ
6
ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟـﻢ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷ ﱠﻭﻝ".
7
2ـ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﻭﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ.
8
ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ :ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ :ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ. ـ 3
ـ ﺳﺎﺩﺳﺎ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺇﻧﻤﺎ
9
1ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ " :ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﻲ ﻏﲑ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺧﺮﺍ".
10
2ـ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴ :ﻋ ﱠﺪﻩ ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ ﻋ ﱠﺪﺍ ﻻ ﺣ ﱠ
ﺠﺔ.
3ـ ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ:
،245ﺍﻟﻄﻮﰲ :ﺷﺮ 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،270 ،ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(49/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ،
ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺿﺔ) ،(766/2ﻭ ﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﰲ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻭﺻ ﻏﲑ ﻗﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ ،245 ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻣﻀﻰ ﺮﳚﻪ ﻧﻔﺎ.
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ.244 ،
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،270 ،ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ).(50/2
5ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺒﻬﻬﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،42ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺋﻊ ﻭﺍ ﻌﻄـﻲ،
ﺭﻗﻢ ،2126ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍ ﺒﻴﻊ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ،1526 ،ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ.
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) (1391/3ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ).(70/2
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ) ،(478/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(294/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ ) ،(513/3ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(1103/3
39
3ـ ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ :ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃ ﺪ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳُﺼﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻴ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺷﻬﺮ؛ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺣـﺪﻳ ﺃﻡ
ﺳﻌﺪ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ 1،ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﺗ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺒـﻲ ρﻏﺎﺋﺐ ،ﻓﻠ ﱠﻤﺎ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺻﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻣﻀـﻰ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ
2
ﺷﻬﺮ.
ـ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻗﺮﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﻒ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨ ﻢ
1ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ :ﺃﻗ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﺮﻳ ،ﻭ ﻜﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻨﺎ" :ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺷﻴ ﲔ ﻟﻔ ﺎ،
3
ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻮﻳﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﻜﻤﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ".
2ـ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴ :ﻣﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻦ ﻧﺼﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟـ ُﻤﺰِﻧﻲ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺃ ﻫﺮﻳﺮﺓ 4ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻮﺳ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳـﺮﺍﻩ ﺃﺻـ ﺎﺑﻪ ﻣـﻦ
5
ﺍﻷﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ.
3ـ ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ:
ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟ ﻛﺘﺒﻨﺎ ﻋﻠ ﺑﻨﻲ ﺇﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻧﻔـﺴﺎ ﺑ ﻴـﺮ
ﻧﻔ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟ ﺭ [...؛ 6ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻟ ﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺍ ﺎﺭِﺏ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧـﻪ Ι
7
ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﻗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺍﺋﻦ.
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮﺓ، ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺑﻦ ﻧﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘ ﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨ " :ρ
1
ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻷ ﻔﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻗﺺ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭﺏ ،ﻭﻧﺘ ﺍﻹﺑ ،ﻭﺣﻠ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﺘﺎﻥ ".
1ـ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺒﺸﺔ ﺑﻨ ﺭﺍﻓﻊ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭﻳﺔ ،ﺻ ﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺟﻠﻴﻠﺔ ،ﻫﻲ ﺃﻡ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﺫ ،τﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﻭﻓﺎ ﺎ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ ) ،(189/4ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻷ ﲑ :ﺃﺳﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺑﺔ ) ،(367/7ﺭﻗﻢ .7457
2ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺋﺰ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1038ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﻬﻘﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺋﺰ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺎ
ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺋﺰ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 7120ﻭﻗﺎﻝ..." :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺮﺳﻞ ﺻ ﻴﺢ".
3ـ ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ) ،(856/2ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛﺸ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺍﺭ ).(383/2
4ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ،ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣ ﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ :ﺷﺮ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﺰ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 345ﻫـ.
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩ :ﺷﺬﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺐ ) ،(370/2ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻪ ﻭﺭﺟﺎﻟﻪ 124 ،ﻫـ.
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) (681/2ﻭﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(327/9ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ ،229 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ
) ،(1103/3ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛﺸ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺍﺭ ) ،(383/2ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،412 ،ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ :ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ).(245/1
6ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺪﺓ.32 :
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(681/2
40
ﺍﻹﺑ ، ﺸﺎﺭﺏ ﻭﻧﺘ
ﰲ ﻭﺟﻮﺑﻪ ﻛﻘﺺ ﺍﻟ ﱠ ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺎ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺘﺎﻥ ﺎ ﻻ ﺧﻼ
2
ﺩﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘ ﺒﺎﺏ.
ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ...] :Ιﻓﻜﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻃﻌﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺋ ﺍﻟﻔﻘـﲑ[ 3،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ
4
ﺍﻷﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺿ ﻴﺔ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻗ ِﺮﻥ ﺑﺎﻹ ﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ.
ـ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺳﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼ ﻛﺴﻘﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﷲ Υ
5
ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ] :ﻭﺃﻗﻴﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ.[...
ـ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌ
6
1ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ :ﻫﻮ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻴﺎﻥ.
7
ﺘ ﱠ ﺑﻪ. 2ـ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴ :ﻗ ﱠ
ﺴﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭ
8
3ـ ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ :ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﳊ .
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،3ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﺒﺎﺱ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻗﺺ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭﺏ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،5889ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺧﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .257
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(327/9ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺋﺪ.661 ،
3ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊ .28 :
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻹﺳﻨﻮﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ.274 ،
5ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ 43 :؛ ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛﺸ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺍﺭ ) ،(2383ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(858/2
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ:ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ).(251/1
7ـ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ) 249/1ﻭ.(251
8ـ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ).(251/1
9ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(49/2ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) (1391/3ﻭﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(63/1ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ـﻴ
) ،(194-148/5ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.306 ،
41
ﺻ ﻭﺍﺷﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻞ ﻭﻟﻘﺐ ﻨﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﻭﺣﺼﺮ ﺃﻏﻴﺎ
1
ﻭﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠـﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻨﻢ ﺳﺎﻣ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ.
ﻭﺍ ﻀﻴﻘﻮﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﺪﺭﻫﻢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻱ ،ﺣﻴ ﺣﺼﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ،ﻋﻠـﻰ
2
ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ .
ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍ ﺘﻮﺳﻄﻮﻥ؛ ﻓﻴﺘﺰﻋﻤﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﻳﺴﲑ ﺑﻴﻨـﻬﻢ ﰲ
3
ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺗﺠﺎﻩ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺩﺭﺝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍ ﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ.
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﱠﻴﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻠﻴُﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺑﻪ ﺍ ﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻫﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ:
ﺃ ـ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
4
ﺏ ـ ﺭﺩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺍﻷﺻﻴﻠﺔ.
ﺝ ــ ﺍﻟﺘﺄ ﺮ ﺑﺎﻻﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺩ ﺔ؛ ﻛﺘﺄ ﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺑﺎﻻﺻـﻄﻼ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ـﻮﻱ
ﻟﻠﱠﻨﻌ ،ﻓﺄﻓﺮﺩﻭﺍ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻝ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺘﺄ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ .Υ
ﺩ ـ ﺍﻟﺘﺄ ﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﺄﺻﻴﻼ ﺍﻟﻌﺎ ﱠﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳـﺪﻓﻊ ﺃﺻـﻮﻟﻴﻲ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺍ ﺸﺘ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﺍﻝ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺗﺘﻮﺍﺀﻡ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻨﻠ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺣﺪﺍ ﺃﺻﻨﺎ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻨ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ.
ـ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻊ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻊ ،ﻭ ﺍﻹﻏﺮﺍﺏ ﺑﺈﺑﺪﺍ ﺍ ﺼﻄﻠ ﺎ ﺗﺄ ﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻐﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻓﺸﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ.
ﻑ ــ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻄ ﻭﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ ـ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ ـ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻣﻊ ﺭﺩ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ.
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﺪﺭﺟﺔ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ) ،(326/1ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ) ،(96/1ﻭﺃﻏﻴﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻏﺎﺯﻱ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻹﳚﻲ :ﺷﺮ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻬﻰ ) ،(173/2ﺍﻹﺳﻨﻮﻱ :ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻝ ).(205/2
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،272 ،ﺍ ﺎﺯﺭﻱ :ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،337 ،ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ :ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ،420 ،ﺍﺑﻦ
ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ ،246 ،ﺧﻼ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،154 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺎﺩﻳ :ﻣﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ.29 ،
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺑﻮﻋﺮﻭﺝ :ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺎﺭﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ.71 ،
42
ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺃ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﺟﺮﻳﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍ ﻔـﺎﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ ﰲ
ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺷ ،ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻮﻳ ـ ﻭﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﻏﲑﻩ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ـ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻋـ
ﻣُﻌﺒﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻴﻊ ﺍ ﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﻘﺪﺣﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﻌﺪﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺍ ـﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻮﺻـﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺑﻌـﺪ ﺎ
1
ﻭﺣﺪ ﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍ ﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺍﻟ ﺻﻨﻔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴـ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﻬـﻮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄ :
1ـ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ:
ﺩﺭﺝ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻩ ﻗﺴﻴﻤﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻻ ﻗﺴﻤﺎ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻳﺮ ﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺮﺝ
ﺸﻲﺀ
ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳉﻮﻳ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺎ ،ﻭﻋﻤﺪ ﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻗـﺪﺭ ﺍﻟـ ﱠ
ﺻﻔﺘﻪ 2،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺮ ﱠﺟﺢ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺈﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻼ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﺴﺒﺒﲔ ﻭﺟﻴﻬﲔ:
ﺃﻭ ﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﻮﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ؛ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ
ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺎﺩﻳ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻛﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ،ﺑﻠﻪ ﺇﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺃﺻﻼ،
3
ﻭﺃ ﺒ ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ ﰲ ﺣ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ.
ﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ،ﺣـ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌـﺾ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻬﺎ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﺃﻓﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭﺍﻩ 4،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻼ.
2ـ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ:
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺍﻟ ﺃﻓﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ" :ﻓـﺄﺭﺩ ﺃﻥ
ﺃﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ ،ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻤﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻠﺔ ﻻ ﻋﻠﺔ ،ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻋﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻛـﺎﺓ
ﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻟﻜﻮ ﺎ ﺗﺴﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻟﻮﺟﺒ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻮ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﺒ ﻟﻨﻌﻤﺔ ﺍ ﻠﻚ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﲡﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
5
ﺴﻮﻡ ﺃ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠ ".ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ) ،(168/1ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﻨ ﻮﻝ ،209 ،ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻝ ) ،(1402/3ﺍﻟﺒ ـﺎﺭﻱ:
ﻛﺸ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺍﺭ ) 380/2ﻭ ،(398ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ) ،(499/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﺝ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﺒﲑ ).(117/1
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،270 ،ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ) ،(327/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ ).(509/3
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﺼﺎ :ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) ،(155/1ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(355/3ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠـﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌـﺪﺓ ) ،(459/2ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺑﺎﺩﻳ :ﺎﻟ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﻛﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺬﻳﺮ.316 ،
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺑﻮﺣﻨﻴﻚ :ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ.
5ـ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ.51 ،
43
ﻭﻣﻊ ﻟﻄﺎﻓﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﺘﺔ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻭ ﱠﳑﻦ ﺻ ﱠﻤﻢ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ 1،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﻔﻨﺪﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺈﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ" :ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ـﻼ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠـﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ]ﻭﺍﺣﺪ[ ،ﻓﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺒﻮﺗﻪ ﺑﺜﺒﻮ ﺎ ،ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎ ﻩ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ،ﺑﻞ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺑﻌـﺪ
2
ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ،ﻭﻛﻴ ﻭ ﻦ ﻮﺯ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻌﻠﺘﲔ."...
ﻭﻣﻌ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﻓﻘ ،ﻭﻻ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜـﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ؛ ﻟﻜ ﱠﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ،ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍ ﺘﺠﻮﻥ
3
ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
4
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻓﻮﺟﻴﻪ؛ ﻭ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺃﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ ﺑﻌﻠـﺘﲔ،
ﻓﺎﳊﻜﻢ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻨﻌﺪﻡ ﺑﻌﻠﺔ ﻭﻳﺜﺒ ﺑﺄﺧﺮ ؛ ﻛﺎﻧﺘﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮﺀ ﻣﺜﻼ ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻐـﺎﺋ
ﻭﻏﲑ ﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋ ﻭﻳﺜﺒ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻘﺾ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻮﻝ.
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺟﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﻭﺍ ﻠﻲ 5ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ،ﺑﺎﻧﺪﺭﺍﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮ ﲢ ﻣﺴ ﱠﻤﻰ ﻣﻔﻬـﻮﻡ
6
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭ ﻌﺘﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﺗُﺴﻮﻏﻮﻥ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟ ﺎ ﻋﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺍﳉـﻮﺍﺏ
ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻞ ﺗﻨﺎﺯ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻳﺒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧـﺎﻩ،
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﺈﻧﻲ ﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﺟﻪ ﲢ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(356/3ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(163/5ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.307 ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،265 ،ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ "ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ" ،ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ﻣﺎ ﺃ ﺒﺘﻪ ﺣ ﻻ ﺎﻟ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍ ﻌﺪﻭﺩ.
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ.265 ،
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻮ ﻦ ﺧﺮ " :ﻟﻜﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻠ ﻜﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ؛ ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻜ ﻻﺯﻡ ،ﻻ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻧﺘﻔـﺎﺀ
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ؛ ﺑﻞ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﺔ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﲢﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻔ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺎﺑﺘﺎ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺳﺒﺐ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﻴـ ﺗﻌـﺪﺩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻞ ،ﺑﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﻴﻌﻬﺎ" .ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ.338 ،
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،336 ،ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ .509 ،
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻻﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ـ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ــ ﲢﻘﻴ ﻧﻔﻴ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻭ ﺼﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻮ ﻛﻨﻘﺾ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﺜﻼ؛ ﳚﻮﺯ
ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻞ ﺍ ﺘﻠﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﲔ ﻛ ﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺩﺓ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﻠﺘﲔ ﺘﻠﻔﺘﲔ ،ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻻﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺷﻲﺀ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ :ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺎﺩﺓ ) ،(179/1ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ) (197/1ﻭﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ.314 ،
5ـ ﻫﻮ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ،ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﺻﻮﱄ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻲ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺷﺮ ﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻣﻊ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 684ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴ ﺎﻭﻱ :ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻊ ) ،(39/7ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩ :ﺷﺬﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺐ ).(303/7
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ) ،(328/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ) ،(501/3ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟـﻮﺭﻭﺩ )(110/1
ﻭﺃﺿﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ).(223/5
44
3ـ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﳌﻜﺎ :
ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﺎﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺻـ ﱠ ﱠﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛـﺸﻲ
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻭﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳊﺮﻣﲔ ﺇﱃ ﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﻴـﺮ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺻ ﻴﺢ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻣﻘـ ﱠﺪﺭﺓ ﰲ
1
ﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍ ﻜﺎﻥ ،ﻛﻜﺎﺋﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﻭﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺴﻞ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ."...
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺭﺻﲔ ،ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻳﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻠـﺔ
ﺬﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻩ "ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ"؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﺬﻭ ﻫﻮ ﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘـﺔ، ﺮﻓﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺎ؛ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺘﻌﻠ
ﻭﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍ ﺎ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺍ 2،ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﻴﺔ:
ﻭﺃﺧ ﻭﺍ ﺑ ﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺮ ﺟﺮ ﻧﺎﻭﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨـﻰ ﻛﺎﺋﻦ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮ.
3
ﻭﺍ ﻌ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺬ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ.
ﻭﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﺟﻪ ﲢ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟـﺸﻮﻛﺎ
4
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺷ ﱠﻬﺮ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮﻋﲔ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻦ ﺳﺒﻘﻪ.
4ـ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ:
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍ ﻘﻘﲔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﰲ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍ ﻘﺎﻡ؛ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﻌﺘﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑ ﻧﻌ ،ﻭﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺻ ﻟﺼﺎﺣﺒﻬﺎ،
ﻗﻴﺪ ﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻬﺎ 5،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻣ ﱠﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺬ ﻛﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﺮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮ ،ﻭ ﱠﳑﻦ ﺻـ ﱠﺮ ـﺬﺍ ﺍﻟـﺴﻤﻌﺎ ،
6
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘ ﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺎﻫﺮ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺻﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﻌ ﻗﻴﺪ ﺎ".
ﺍﻷﻭﺻﺎﻑ ﺍﻟ ﺗﻄﺮﺃ ﻭﺗﺰﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ: 5ـ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺼﻴ
ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻌ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮﻋﲔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺗﺸﺎ ﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻣﻀﻰ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﰲ
ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻷﻭﺻﺎ ﺍﻟ ﺗﻄﺮﺃ ﻭﺗﺰﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻓﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻓﺄ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺼﻮ
ﻻ ﻳﻔﺮ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﱠﺘﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋ ﱠﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻟ ﱠ ﻟﻔـﻪ
1ـ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(133/5ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﺝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺘﻪ ).(328/1
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻫﺸﺎﻡ :ﺷﺮ ﻗﻄﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺪ .120 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻟﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ).(213/1
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ .310 ،
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﺝ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﺒﲑ ) ،(117/1ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ :ﻣﻨﻊ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻧﻊ ،513 ،ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ـﻮﻝ،
306ﻭ ، 309ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ) ،(111/1ﺍﻷﺷﻘﺮ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ.182 ،
6ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ) ،(502/3ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ) ،(251/1ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ).(328/1
45
ﻗﺴﻴﻤﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﺻ ﱠﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺘﺎﺯﺍ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻷﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ
1
ﺃﻋﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻌ ﺍﻟﻨ ﻮﻱ.
ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﱠﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺷﺬ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ُﻣﻔﺮﺩﺍ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺎﻟﻔﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭ ﱠﳑﻦ
ﺻﺮ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﺭﺍﺟﻪ ﲢ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺬﺭ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺻﻨﻴﻌﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ـﺼﻴﺺ
ﻛﻞ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻜﻢ ،ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍ ﺧﺮ ،ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻋ ﱠﻤﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﻟﻠﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ 2،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃ ﻌﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﻣُﻨـﺰﱠﻩ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﱄ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﻛﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻌ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻭﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺃﻥ
ﺻﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣُﻌﺘﻤـﺪﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﺩﺍﻋﻲ ﻟﻠﺘﻔﺮﻳﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺎﺋﻞ ،ﺧﺎ ﱠ
ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻻ ﺎ ﻟﻪ.
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﺪﺭﺟﺔ
1ـ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﺑ ﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﻲ:
ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﰲ ﻧﻮ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊـﺼﺮ،
ﻫﻞ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻄﺮﻳ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﺃﻭ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ .
ﻓﺎﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺭ ﱠﺟ ﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ
ﺠﺔ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﺔ 3،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﻔـﲑ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﱠ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺄ
ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻤﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ،ﻓﺎﻷﻛﺜﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﺩﺭﺟﻮﻩ ﲢ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﺮﺩﻩ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﺒ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﻢ.
ﻭﺫﻫﺒ ﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻨﻄﻮ ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺟـﺰﻡ ﺑـﻪ
1
ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﰲ ﺍ ﻠ ﺺ ،ﻭﺭ ﱠﺟ ﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ 4،ﻭﺍﻧﺘﺼﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺘﺎﺯﺍ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺘﺎﺯﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ) ،(174/2ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﺍ ﺬﻛﺮﺓ ،240 ،ﻭﻟﻠﻌﻠﻢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﻻ
ﺘ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ،ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺿﻌﻴ ؛ ﻭﻣﻨﺸ ﻩ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻋ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ" .ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ.270 ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ ) ،(505/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ.244 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،309 ،ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ).(329/1
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،309 ،ﻗﺪ ﻳﺴﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺃﻧﻲ ﺃﺷﺮ ﺳﺎﻟﻔﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ
ﳑﻦ ﻳﺮﺟﺢ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻳﺰﻭﻝ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﺮﺩﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﻲ ﻳﺴﺒﻘﻪ ،ﻭﺗﺄﻣﻞ ﻣﻌـﻲ
ﺗﻌﻘﺒﻪ ﻟﻠﺘ ﻳﺰﻱ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ..." :ﻫﺬﻩ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﺣﺼﺮ ،ﻓﺘﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻭﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺜﻞ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻨـﺎ:
ﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﺇﻻ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ،ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﺎ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻪ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ" ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻮ ﻦ ﺧﺮ..." :ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺇﻻ ﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺇﻻ ﺯﻳﺪ ﻓ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ".
ﺍﻧ ﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺗﻴﺐ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) ،(1393/3ﻭﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ.51 ،
46
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ..." :ﺍﳊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻﺷﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻹ ﺒﺎ ﻛﻼ ﺎ ﻣﻨﻄـﻮ ﺻـﺮﻳﺢ،
ﻓﻠﻔ ﺔ ﻻ ﺻﺮ ﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻔﻲ ،ﻭﻟﻔ ﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺻﺮ ﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻹ ﺒﺎ ،ﻓﻌﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻏﻠ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳ ﻬﺮ
،241ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ :ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ).(98/1 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ،
2ـ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﺍ ﺬﻛﺮﺓ.238 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ) ، (479/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(278/3ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ) ،(329/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠـﺎﺭ:
ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ ) ،(515/4ﺍﻟﻄﻮﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺿﺔ ) ،(740/2ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.309 ،
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ،51 ،ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(68/2ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠـﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌـﺪﺓ ) ،(479/2ﺍﻟﻐـﺰﺍﱄ:
ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،271 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ ،242 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﺝ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﺒﲑ ).(118/1
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(68/2ﺃﻣﲑ ﺑﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ :ﺗﻴﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮﻳﺮ ) ،(132/1ﺍﻟﻄﻮﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺿـﺔ )،(741/2
ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.309 ،
47
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺭﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ " :εﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺴﻴ ﺔ" 1،ﻭ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ﻓﻬﻤـﻪ
ﻟﻠ ﺼﺮ ،ﻭﻋﺪﻟﻮﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺧﺮ 2،ﻣﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻄﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ τﻗﺪ ﺒ ﺗﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻛﻨ ﺃﻓ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ
3
ﺣ ﺣ ﱠﺪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍ ﺪﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ εﻰ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﺃ ﺎﻛﻢ ﻋﻨﻪ".
3ـ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺼﺮ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﰲ ﺍﳋ :
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﻛﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻋ ﱠﺪﻩ ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺘ ﱠ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻟﻴﲔ؛
ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﲔ ،ﻭ ﺎ:
ﺃ ـ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺼﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻐـﺰﺍﱄ ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ..." :ﻭﻫـﺬﺍ ﻫـﻮ
6
ﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴ " 4،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺭﺟ ﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻮﺫﺍ 5ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ .
ﺏ ـ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﻣﻨﻄﻮﻗﺎ :ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻮﻳ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭ ﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠـﺔ
7
ﻛﺎ ﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺠﺎﺭ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻟ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺒﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻳ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﺃﺻﻼ؛ ﻭﻫـﻮ
8
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ.
ﻭﺃﺭﺟﺢ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﺓ ﻟﻠ ﺼﺮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ψﻭﺃﺋ ﱠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻛﻤـﺎ
ﺳﻴﺄ .
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺛﺎﻟ ﺎ :ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﺪﺭﺟﺔ
1ـ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﻧﻊ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) 294/3ﻭ ،(295ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ).(514/3
2ـ ﻝ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ :ﺍ ﺴﻮﺩﺓ ).(685/2
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ).(478/2
4ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ).(295/3
5ـ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﻨ ﻮﻝ.219 ،
53
ﺠﺔ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺟﻨﺢ
ﺎﻫﲑ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘ ﻭﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮ ﺣ ﱠ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻧ ﺮﺍ ﻟﺘﻮﺳﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺘﺠﲔ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﺴﺄﺭﺟ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻋﻨـﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻄﻠـﺐ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎ .
2
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﱠﳑﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ".
ﻓﻨ ﻦ ﻧﻠ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺜﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺳ ﱠﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘـﻮﻝ ﺑـﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳُﺼﺮ ﺑﻨﻮﻋﻪ ِﻟﻠ ِﻌﻠ ِﻢ ﺑﻪ.
ﺛﺎﻟ ﺎ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻳﺔ
3
1ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ :ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻪ ﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ.
4
2ـ ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ :ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ..." :εﻓﻜﻠﻮﺍ ﻭﺍﺷﺮﺑﻮﺍ ﺣ ﻳﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﻡ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﻡ ".
ﻋﻠ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ... ":ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺍﻷﻛﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺫﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺃ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺑـﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ 5،"...ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻞ ﻧ ـﺮ؛
ﻓﺴﻴﺄ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺘ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺑﺼﻔﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻄﻮﻗﺎ ﻻ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ.
ﺭﺍﺑﻌﺎ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ
6
1ـ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ :ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ،ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻪ ﻋ ﱠﻤﻦ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ.
2ــ ﻣ ﺎﻟﻪ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ..." :ﺭﺃﻳ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ،ﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺭ ﻳﺔ ﻏﲑﻩ،ﻭﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺭ ﻳـﺔ ﺯﻳـﺪ
ﻓﻘ 7،"...ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻧﺺ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎﻷ ﺎﺀ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ.
ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻲ ﺧﺮ ﻭﻗﻔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ،ﺣﻴ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ " :ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ :ﻭ ﺎﺫﺍ ﺗﻔـﻮ
ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻌﺔ ،ﺍﺗﻔ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﺗﻔﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺮﺩ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﰲ ﺗـﺸﺒﻴﻪ
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺟﻠﻮﺩ ﺍ ﻴﺘﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،18ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺘﲑﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺧـﺼﺔ ﰲ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺘﺎ ﻠﻮﺩ ﺍ ﻴﺘﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﺑﻐ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،4252ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﺒﺎﺱ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺃﻫﺐ ﺍ ﻴﺘﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،4124ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺔ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﺒﺎﺱ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻟﺒ ﺟﻠﻮﺩ ﺍ ﻴﺘﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﺑﻐ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،3612ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ،ﻭﺣﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﻌ .
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(275/4
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(529/2
4ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺴ ﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺪﺍﺀ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،14ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺫﺍﻥ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺃﺫﺍﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﻰ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻩ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،617ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻡ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ ﺼﻞ ﺑﻄﻠﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .1092
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(26/2
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(521/2
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(518/2
55
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪ ،ﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﺗﻔﻮ ﻮﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺍ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ؛ ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻓ ﺎﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴ ﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﻔﻮ ﻮﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺄﻭﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺎ ﺭﻭ ﰲ ﺍ ﺪﻭﻧـﺔ ﻋـﻦ
ﻣﺎﻟﻚ :ﺇﻥ ﻓﺎﺗ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻌﺔ ﺑﻨﻤﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﺧﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺋﻊ ،ﻭ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺍ .
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻟﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻴﻦ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺭﻭ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ
1
ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻷ ﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺿﻌﻴ ".
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺺ ﻳﻔﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻲ ﻭﺍ ﺧﺮ ﺗﺒﻌﻲ؛ ﻓﺄﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒـﺎﺟﻲ ﻳـﺮ
ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻠﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﰲ ﺍ ﺜﺎﻝ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭ ﱠﺩ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺗﺄﻭﻟﻪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍ ﺪﻭﻧﺔ ،ﻓﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﻴﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺋﻊ ﺑﻔﻮﺍ ﺍﻟـﺴﻠﻌﺔ ﺑﻨﻤـﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ
ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ؛ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻴﲑ ﻮﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺍ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎﻷ ﺎﺀ ﻭﻫـﻲ ﺍﻷﻟﻘـﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﺿﻌﻴ .
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺇﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺍ ﺪﻭﻧﺔ ،ﻭﻫـﻲ ﻣـﺴﺄﻟﺔ
ﺧﻼﻓﻴﺔ ﺳﻴﺄ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻻﺣﻘﺎ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ.
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺍ ﻌﺘ ﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴ ُﻢ ﻻ ﺍﳊﺠﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻴ ﻫﻮ
ﺑﺪﻋﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻣ ﱠﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺻﱠﻨ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻭ ـﺘ ﱠ ـﺎ،
ﻭﺍﻷﻗﺮﺏ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺻﱠﻨ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﺄ ﺮﺍ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ .
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧ ﺃﻟﻔ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎ ﺍﻟ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ُﻣﺠﻤﻞ ﻛﻼﻣـﻪ،
ﻭﻟﻴ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺗﻌﺮﻳ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﻌﺮﻳ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺮﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎ .
1
ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(420/6
56
ﺗﺴﺘ ﻔﺮ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺳﺒﻌ ﻣﺮﺓ ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳ ﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻟﻬﻢ[...؛ 1ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺳﻴﺄ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻻﺣﻘﺎ ،ﻭﺿ ﱠﻤﱠﻨﻪ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪ ﻋـﻦ
2
ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ.
ﻭﻏﲑ ﺧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌُﻤ ِﺪ ﺍﻟ ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍ ﺘﺠﻮﻥ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ.
ﺍ ﱠﺪﻋِﻲ 1،"...ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ " :ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺃ ﺒ ﺟﻨ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺟﻨﺒﺔ ﺍ ﱠﺪﻋِﻲ ،ﻭﻟﻴ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﱠﻋﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺫﻛﺮ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻓﺮ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ" :ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ
ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ" ،ﺃﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ" :ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ" ،ﺃﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ" :ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺪﻋﻲ" ،ﺃﻭ ﺗﻘـﻮﻝ:
"ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺪﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺔ" ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍ ﻌﻨـﻰ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :εﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ" 2،ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ
3
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ".
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺪﻋﻲ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1341ﻭﺿﻌﻔﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠـﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺘﻠ ﻴﺺ ) ،(229/4ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻬﻘﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻗﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺎ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻗﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .17779
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻟ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﱠﺪﻋِﻲ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﺝ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﺸ ﻮﻥ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻔﺎﻩ ﺍﳉﺼﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻬﻢ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﺒﲑ ) ،(119/1ﺍﳉﺼﺎ :ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ).(181/1
2ـ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺸﻬﺎﺩ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻓﺴﺄﻭﺭﺩ ﺮﳚﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻊ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺎ ﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺷﺘﺮ ﺘﻪ ﻷ ﻴـﺔ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﺍ ﺎﺷﻴﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 23ﺑﻠﻔ " :ﻭﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻐ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ، "..
ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻠﻔ " :ﻭﰲ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺘﻬﺎ،"...ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1454ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ،
ﺑﺎﺏ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 1567ﺑﻠﻔ " :ﻭﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ،"..ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﺑﻨﻔ ﻟﻔ ﺃ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،2455ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ﺍﻹﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 621ﺑﻠﻔـ " :
...ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﺷﺎﺓ ﺷﺎﺓ ،"...ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 1805ﺑﻠﻔ " :ﰲ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﺷـﺎﺓ ﺷـﺎﺓ ،"...
ﻭﺃ ﺪ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻨﺪﻩ )/211/8ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺎ ( ﺑﻠﻔ " :ﻭﰲ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺘﻬﺎ" ،ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﺑﻠﻔ " :ﻭﰲ ﺳـﺎﺋﻤﺔ
ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﻓﻔﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﺎﺓ "...ﺭﻗﻢ ،1441ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﻬﻘﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺎ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻛﻴ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ
ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ،ﺑﻠﻔ " :ﻭﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺘﻬﺎ" ﺭﻗﻢ ،7396ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻗﻄ ﺑﻨﻔ ﻟﻔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻬﻘﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺯﻛـﺎﺓ ﺍﻹﻳـﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺭﻗﻢ .1984
ﻭﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎ ﻻ ﺪﻩ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ،ﻓﻠﻌﻠﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺑﺎ ﻌ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺟﺎﺋﺰﺓ ﻟﻌﺎ ﺎ ﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻌ .
3ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(519/2
59
ﺼﻌﻴ ُﺪ ﺍ ﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﱠﺘﻴﻤﻢ ﺑﻪ؛
ﻭﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺧﺮ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺏ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ " :τﺍﻟﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺏ " 1،ﻓﻴﻔﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ " :ﻟﻴ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺩﻟﻴـﻞ
2
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺏ ﻻ ﻳﺴ ﱠﻤﻰ ﺻﻌﻴﺪﺍ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻟﻠﺘﺮﺍﺏ ﻓﻘ ".
ﻓﻨ ﻦ ﻧﺮ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ،ﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻟ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻮ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺍﺳﻢ
ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﻟﻠﺘﺮﺍﺏ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﻤﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷ ﺮ ﳊﻜﻤﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻓﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﻠﻘـﻮﻝ
ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﰲ ﺣﺮ ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ.
ﻋﺎﺷﺮﺍ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺍﳌﺸﺘ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻝ ﻋﻠ ﺟﻨ
ﺼﺎ،
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺟﺪ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧ ﱠ
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ:
ﺃ ﱠﻭ ﻤﺎ ﺗﺼﺮ ﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎ ﺸﺘ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻛﺎﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ
3
ﺑﻪ.
ﻭ ﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﻗﺮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﰲ ﻗﺼﺮ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻄﻌﻮﻡ ﺍﺳـﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺣـﺪﻳ
ﺺ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ؛ ﻓﺪﻝ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻏـﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻓﻮﺟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺧ ﱠ
4
ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﺎﻟ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ".
ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﻢ ﻻ ﺘﺠﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻘﺐ ،ﻭﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺜﺎﻝ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ.
ﺍﳊﺎﺩ ﻋﺸﺮ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨ ε
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗ ﻘﻘﻲ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺍﻟ ﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ! ،ﻭﻟﻠﻔﺎﺋـﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﻧﱠـﻪ
ﺎﻟ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻُﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻮﻗﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﺸﻬﺮ ،ﻭﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﻣـﺬﻫﺐ
ﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﺍ ﺎﻧﻌﲔ ﻟﻠﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﻓﻨﻪ ،ﻭ ﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺷﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻُـﻠﻲ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍ ﻴ ،ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺃﻡ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ.
1ـ ﺃﻗ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻬﻘﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺑﻠﻔ " :ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﺮ ،ﺣﺮ ﺍﻷﺭ " ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1057ﻭﻋﻨـﺪ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﻪ ﺑﺮﻗﻢ 814؛ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺳ ﻞ :ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﻴﺐ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﺍﳊﺮ ".
2ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ.102 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(522/2
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(272/6
60
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﺄﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺜِﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺻﻼﺗﻪ ρﻋﻠﻰ ﻫـﺬﻩ ﺍ ـﺮﺃﺓ
ﻭﻣﺜﻴﻼ ﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻞ ﺑﻌﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻨﻮﻳﺮ ﻗﺒﻮﺭ ﺍ ﻮﺗﻰ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺎ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻞ ،ﻭﻟﻴ ﻫـﺬﺍ ـﻞ
1
ﺑﺴﻄﻬﺎ.
ﺍﻟ ﺎ ﻋﺸﺮ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﻧﻊ
ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘ ﻩ ﻛﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ.
ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻗﺮﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﻒ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﻘﱠﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻮ ﰲ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﻣﻪ ،ﻻﺑ ﱠﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻣﻬـﻢ؛
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺷﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻄ ﺗﻨ ﱠﻮﻋ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺎ ﻢ ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﻳ ﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﻢ،
ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﻋ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﺴ ﺍﻝ ،ﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻄ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ .
ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﻮﻋ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺎ ﻢ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﺒﺎﻳﻨ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍ ﻢ ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﻤﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺒ ـ ﺍﻟﻌﻤـﻮﻡ،
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﺒ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻣﻨـﺰ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠـﺎﺝ
ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻋﺮ ﺍﳉﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺼﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬـﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ ﻜﺎﻳﺔ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻋ ﱠﺪﻩ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ.
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﺒ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺗﻮ ﱠﺳﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺘﺠﲔ
ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ ﻋﺮ ﻷﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﺎﻥ:
1ـ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ:
ﻭ ﱠﻫ ﱠﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻄ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺄﺩﻟﺔ ﻻ ﺮﺝ ﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺷﻴ ﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ:
ﺃ ـ " ...ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﲔ ﺍ ﻘﺘﺮﻧﲔ ﻟﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻭﻳﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺮﺩ ﻜﻢ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣـﺎ
2
ﻗﺎﺭﻧﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ُﻳﺠﻤﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻭﺭﺩﺍ ﻣﻔﺘﺮﻗﲔ".
ﻭﻣﻌ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﱠﻴﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﻜﻢ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻭ
ﻳﻨﻘﺺ ،ﻓﺎﳊﻜﻢ ﻤﺎ ﺑﻨﻔ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ﺎ ﻣﻘﺘﺮﻧﲔ ﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ؛ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ.
ﺏ ـ " ﺃﻥ ﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺷﻴ ﲔ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ،ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺳـﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﺣﻜـﺎﻡ ﺇﻻ
3
ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻓﺒﺄﻥ ﻻ ﳚﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﳚﻤﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﻠﺔ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻭﺃﺣﺮ ".
ﻭﰲ ﺧﺘﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ،ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺎﻥ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺿﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗـﺪﻡ ﺳـﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻫﻢ ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻓﺎﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻴﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺗﺮﺗﺒ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺾ ﺃﺫﻫﺎﻥ ﺍ ﺒﺘﺪﺋﲔ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺟﻠﻴﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻴﱠﺰ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺑﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺩﻗﻴ ﻭﻫﻮ" :ﺃﻥ ﻳُﻌﻠ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌ ﰲ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳉﻨ ،ﻓﻴﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻤﱠﺎ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍ ﻌ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳉﻨ " ،ﻓﻠ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﻨﻮ ﺔ ﺑﺈﻟﻐﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﻌﻲ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻏﻔﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺑﻠﻔ ﺍ ﻨﺎﻗﻀﺔ.
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻳﻄﻠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟ ـ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌـﻲ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﺗﻮﺻﻠﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺎ ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻳﻜﺘﺮ ﺎ ،ﻭﺇ ﺎ ﺍﻛﺘﻔـﻰ ﺑﺘـﺴﻤﻴﺔ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍ ﻘﻘﲔ ﻓﺈ ﻢ ﻳﻠﺘﻔﺘﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﺴﻤﻴﺎ ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷ ﺎﺀ.
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺼﻮ ﺍﻟﺰﺧﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﺎﺟ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ،ﻓﻘﺪ
ﻀﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻘﻠﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻛﺘﻔﻰ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﺭﺑﻌﺔ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ :ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ،
ﺍﺗ ﱠ
ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﲔ.
ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔـﺼﻞ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺎﻧ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻌﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﺳﺄﻋﺮ
ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻋ ﻴﻢ ﺍﻷ ﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
ﻭﺣ ﺗﺘﻀﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍ ﻮﺿﻮ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺷﻄﺮﺗﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺷﻄﺮﻳﻦ ،ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺃﻋ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺒﻴـﺎﻥ
ﺣﺠﻴﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍﻹ ﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻮﻗﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻓﻴـﻪ ،ﻭﺗﻔﺎﺻـﻴﻞ
ﺭﺍﺋﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻮﺋﻬﺎ ﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺠﻼﺀ ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﻮﺿﻮ ،ﻭﻣـﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺘـﻪ ﺃﻭ
ﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ﻢ ،ﻣﻊ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺄﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺘﻨﺎﺀ ﺑﺄﻣﺮ ﻣﻬﻢ؛ ﻭﻫـﻮ ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﺍ ـﺎﺭ
ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﺘﺸﺎﺑﻜﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﲡﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ.
،265 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺭ :ﺍ ﻘﺪﻣﺔ ،81 ،ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(521/2ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘـﺼﻔﻲ،
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ) ،(238/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ ،235 ،ﻝ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ :ﺍ ﺴﻮﺩﺓ ).(679/2
2ـ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﺣﻴ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻦ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﻧﻘﻞ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺣﻜﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ ﺇﻋﻤﺎ ﻢ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﲔ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(323/2ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ) ،(453/2ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ) ،(238/1ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ :
ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ.423 ،
66
ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺳﻴﺎ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﱠﺎﺭ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﺩ ﺗﻔﺮﻳ 1،ﻭﻻ ﻨﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺇﻫﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ،ﻭﺳﻴﺄ ﻻﺣﻘﺎ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻬﻮﺭﻫﻢ ﻻ ـﺘ ﻔﻬـﻮﻡ
ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ.
ﻏﲑ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﻢ ﻗﻴﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻤﻠﺔ ﺷﺮﻭ ،ﺗﻔﺎﺩﻳﺎ ﻟﻠﺰﻟﻞ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ؛ ﻭﻧ ـﺮﺍ
ﻟﺒﺎﻟ ﺃ ﻴﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻷﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻞ ﺍﺗﻔﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﻓﺴﺄﻓﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻟـﺬﻛﺮ
ﻋﻘﺐ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺍ ﺬﺍﻫﺐ.
ﺔ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ :ﻭﻳﺄ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺘﻘﺪﻣﻮﻥ ـ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻟﻴ
ﺑﺎﻟـﺬﻛﺮ ﺣﻜﻤـﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ؛ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﺼﺎ " :2ﻭﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺼﻮ
3
ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻩ ﻼﻓﻪ."...
ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻻ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪﺓ 4،ﻭ ﻳﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﰲ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺑﲔ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﱠﺎﺭ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎﺱ ،ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﺻ ﱠﺮ ﺍﳉﺼﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎ ﺎ ﳑﱠﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺎﺻﺮ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺣﺼﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺼﻮﻥ ﺍ ﺸﺮﻛﲔ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻣﻦ
ﺴ ﰲ ﻗﺮﻳﺔ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺼﻦ :ﺃﻣﻨﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻜﻢ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺩﻟﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﺋﺔ ﺭﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻓﺈﻧﱠﻪ ﻳُﺮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺄﻣﻨﻪ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﻘﻞ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺩﻟﻜﻢ ﻛﺬﺍ ،ﻓﺄﻣﱠﻨﻪ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻓﻨـﺰﻝ،
ﻓﻼ ﺃﻣﺎﻥ ﱄ.
1ـ ﻋﻠ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍ ﻮ ﺄ" :ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻄﻰ ﻋﻄﻴﺔ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻮﺍ ﺎ ،ﻣﺎ ﺍ ﻌﻄﻰ ﻓﻮﺭ ﺘﻪ ﻨــﺰﻟﺘﻪ"...؛
ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺒﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧ ﻟﻐﲑ ﻮﺍﺏ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻫﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺍﺏ ﺎﻟ ﳊﻜﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺒﺔ ،ﻭﻫـﺬﺍ
ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻓﺄﺧ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻮ ﺍ ﻌﻄﻲ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﺍ ﺒﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴﺢ."...
ﻗﻠ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﰲ ﺇﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(6/8
2ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺃ ﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ،ﺭﺋﻴ ﺣﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 370ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ،144 ،ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ :ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍ ﻀﻴﺔ ).(220/1
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﺼﺎ :ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ).(154/1
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺧﺴﻲ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺧﺴﻲ ) ،(255/1ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛﺸ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺍﺭ ) ،(373/2ﺍﻟﻼﻣﺸﻲ :ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ
ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ.144 ،
67
ﻓﻌﻠ ﺍﳉﺼﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻓﻠﻢ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻤﺪ ﻭﻗﻮ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ
ﻣ ﻳ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮ ﻓﻼ ﺃﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﺿ ﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘ ـﺼﻴﺺ
1
ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻻ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻩ ﻓ ﻜﻤﻪ ﻼﻓﻪ".
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﻫﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ؛ ﻓ ﱠﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺘﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺩﻭﺍ ـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ،ﻭﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻼ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺷ ﱠﺪ ﺃﺯﺭﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﰲ
ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ؛ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ 2،ﻭﻛﺄ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺱ ﺑﻦ ﺳﺮﻳ 3،ﻭﺃ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻔـﺎﻝ 4ﻭﻛـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮﻳﺔ.
ﻓﺄﺻ ﺎﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﻳﻨﺎﻗﻀﻮﻥ ﺎﻣﺎ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻓﲑﻭﻥ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴـﻞ ﺍ ﻄـﺎﺏ
ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺳﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺣﻜـﻢ ﺍ ـﺴﻜﻮ
ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ؛ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻤﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻛﺎﻻﺳﺘﺼ ﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺘـ ﻩ
5
ﺃﺻ ﺎﺏ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ.
ﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻋﺮﻓﻬﻢ ﻓﻘ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﺴﺐ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻤﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ـ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ :ﻫﻮ
ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ؛ ﻭﺑﻴﱠﻦ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﻢ ﻳﻨﻔﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺄﻗﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﻓﻘ ،ﻭ ﳑﱠﻦ ﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ
6
ﺍﻷﺋﻤﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺧﺴﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﲑ. ﺃﻳﻀﺎ
ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴ ﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﺢ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍ ﺘﺄﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻓﻘ ،
ﻭﳑﱠﻦ ﻗ ﱠﺮ ﱠﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﺝ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ..." :ﻭﺗﺪﺍﻭﻟﻪ ﺍ ﺘﺄﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﻭﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﺍ ﺒﺎﺯﻱ 7ﰲ ﺣﺎﺷـﻴﺔ
68
ﺍﻷﺋﻤﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺩﺭﻱ 2،" 1ﻭﺃﻳﱠﺪﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺍ ﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ
3
ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍ ﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ.
ﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﻓﻘ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﻘـﻴﺾ ﻣـﻦ ﺍ ـﺬﻫﺐ ـ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﻫﻮ
4
ﺍﻟﺴﱠﺎﺑ ،ﻭﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺗﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﱠﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ.
ﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﺩﻭ ﺍﳋ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﺍ ﻠﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ، ـ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳋﺎﻣ :ﻫﻮ
ﻭ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ،ﻭﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ..." :ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ؛ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻨﻔـﻲ
ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻓﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﻟﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺍﻹﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺒﻌﻀﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻌﻴﱠﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻠﻨﱠﻔﻲ ،ﻼ
ﺍﻹﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﻮ :ﺯﻛﻮﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﳑﱠﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﻼ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﻘﻴﺪ
5
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﻔﻲ".
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺍ ﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟ ﻭﻗﻔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭ ﺍﻟ ﺍﺷـﺘﺮ ﻬﺎ
ﺍ ﺘﺠﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻛﻞ ﺴﺐ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻼﺣ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ،
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻓﺮﺩ ﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻷ ﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﰲ ﺜﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴ ﻬﺮ ﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺑـﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ
ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ.
ﺷﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ :ﺍﺗﻔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﻮﻥ ﺠﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ــ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ــ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭ ﻟﻠﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻧ ﺮﺍ ﻟﺘﻨﺎ ﺮﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘـﺐ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻘـﺪ
ﺣﺮﺻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺼﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭ ﻊ ﺃﻛ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ :
ﻜﻤﻪ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻭﺟﺪ ﺩﻟﻴـﻞ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠ 1ـ ﺃ ﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﰲ ﻜﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻜﻮﺕ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺎ
ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻧ ﺬ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ: ﺧﺎ
1ـ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﻮﺭ ﺑﻦ ﻟﻘﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻤﺪ ،ﺣﻨﻔﻲ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣ ﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 562ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ :ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍ ﻀﻴﺔ ) ،(443/2ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻪ ﻭﺭﺟﺎﻟﻪ.216 ،
2ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﺝ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﺒﲑ ).(117/1
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺻﺎﱀ :ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ).(685/1
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ) ،(335/1ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.303 ،
ﻭﺗﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪ ﺗﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻣﻊ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳـﻨﺔ
756ﻫـ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳊﺴﻴ :ﺒﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ،230 ،ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻪ ﻭﺭﺟﺎﻟﻪ.346 ،
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ).(334/1
69
ﺃ ـ ﺃ ﻳﻌﺎﺭﺿﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ :ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻲ τﻭ ﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻋـﺪﻡ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺜﻰ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ] :Υﻳﺎ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟـﺬﻳﻦ ﺒﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎ
ﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻠ ﺍﻟﺤﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺤﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻭﺍﻟ ﻧ ﺑﺎﻟ ﻧ . [...
1
ﻟﻜ ﱠﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﱠﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ـ ﻭﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺇ ﺎﻋﺎ ــ ﺃ ﺒﺘـﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻘـﺼﺎ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭ ﻳﻌﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ؛ ﻌﺎﺭﺿﺘﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﻭﻛﺘﺒﻨـﺎ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃ ﺍﻟﻨﻔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔ 2،[ ...ﻭﻛﻼﻣﻬﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺷﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻨﺎ ﺷﺮ
3
ﻟﻨﺎ ،ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺩ ﰲ ﺷﺮﻋﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺎﻟﻔﻪ.
ﺏ ـ ﺃ ﻳﻌﺎﺭﺿﻪ ﺇ ﺎ :ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻫﺐ ﻓﺮﻳ ﻣـﻦ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻘﺘﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺃ ﺪ ،ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻟﲔ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ
4
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ] :ﻭﻛﺘﺒﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃ ﺍﻟﻨﻔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔ .[ ...
ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻗﻀﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺘﻞ؛ ﻭﻋﻤﺪ ﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ τ
ﻗﺘﻞ ﻧﻔﺮﺍ ﺴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﺑﺮﺟﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻗﺘﻠﻮﻩ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻏﻴﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻟﻮ ﺎﻷ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻫـﻞ ﺻـﻨﻌﺎﺀ
ﻀﺮ ﺍﻟـﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ψﻭ ﻟﻘﺘﻠﺘﻬﻢ ﻴﻌﺎ" 5،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻗﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻤﺮ τﺒ
6
ﻳﻌﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺎﻟ ،ﻓﺜﺒ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺇ ﺎ .
ﻜﻤﻮﺍ ﺑﻀﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺘﻨﺒﺎ ﺎ ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺣﻜﻤﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺑﺎﳊﺮ ،ﻭ
8
ﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﻹ ﺎ . ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ...] :Υﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺒﺪ [...؛ 7ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
70
ﺝ ـ ﺃ ﻳﻌﺎﺭﺿﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ :ﻓﻴﻘﺪﱠﻡ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻓﻬـﻮ
1
ﻧﺺ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺘﻪ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺑﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ.
ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ " :εﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﺘ ﺷﺮﻛﺎ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﻋﺒﺪ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎﻝ ﻳﺒﻠ ﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻗـﻮﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻋﺪﻝ 2،"...ﻓﻠﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﱠ
ﺺ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺒﺪ ،ﻟﻜ ﱠﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ
ﻳﻌﺎﺭﺿﻪ ،ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺩﻗﻴ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺪ ..." :ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺒﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ
ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ؛ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻣﻌ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ
4
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ" 3،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻣﻌ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﺎﺀ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻭﻱ.
ﺩ ـ ﺃ ﻳﻌﺎﺭﺿﻪ ﻗﻴﺎ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣُﻜِﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ؛ ﺃﻱ ﺗﻘﺪ ﻬﻢ ﻟﻠﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎ ،ﻭ ﺎﻟ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣـﻦ ﺍ ﻘﻘـﲔ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍ ﻌﺘ ﻳﻘﺪﱠﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ" :ﻻ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ
ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻨـﺰﻟﺔ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺑﲔ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﺎﻩ
5
ﺟﺎﺯ ﺗﺮﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ".
2ـ ﺃﻻ ﺗ ﻬﺮ ﺃﻭﻟﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻜﻮﺕ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﺍﺗﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ :ﻭﺇﻻ ﺍﺳﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺒﻮ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﰲ
ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻻ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ 6،ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺴﻘﻮ ﻗﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﰲ ﺣ
7
ﻣﺘﻌﻤﺪ ﺗﺮﻛﻬﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ " : εﻣﻦ ﻧﺴﻲ ﺻﻼﺓ ﻓﻠﻴﺼﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ."...
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،272 ،ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻳ :ﺍ ﻨﺎﻫ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ.329 ،
2ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺘ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻻﺀ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﺘ ﺷﺮﻛﺎ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﳑﻠﻮﻙ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺘ ،ﺑﺎﺏ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻋﺘ ﻋﺒﺪﺍ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،2522ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺘ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺳﻌﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .1501
3ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺩﻗﻴ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ).(253/4
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(139/5ﺍﻷﺷﻘﺮ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ.207 ،
5ـ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ ،224 ،ﻭﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﺮﻭﻥ؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻮﺫﺍ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ) ،(221/2ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛـﺸﻲ:
ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(139/5ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺧﺸﻲ :ﻣﻨﺎﻫ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ) ،(428/1ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.304 ،
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ :ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ،419 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ ).(489/3
7ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،25ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻗﻴ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺴﻲ
ﺻﻼﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،597ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺟﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻗﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺘﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،684ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺃﻧ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﺴﻠﻢ.
71
ﻓﺄﺟﺎﺏ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺎﺯﺭﻱ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ " :ﻟﻴ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴـﻪ
ﺑﺎﻷﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺳﻘﻮ ﺍﻹ ،ﻓﺄﺣﺮ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺐ
1
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺪ".
3ـ ﺃ ﺗ ﻬﺮ ﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺇ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻜﻮﺕ :ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗـﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﺘﻠـﻮﺍ
ﺃﻭﻻﺩﻛﻢ ﺸﻴﺔ ﺇﻣﻼ [ ...؛ 2ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ" :ﻓﺬﻛﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺍ ﺎ ﺒﲔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ؛ ﺇﺫ ﻫﻮ
3
ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺘﻠﻬﻢ ،ﻻ ﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻪ."...
ﺮﻣ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺃﻣﻬـﺎﺗﻜﻢ 4ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻜﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺮﺝ ﺮﺝ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺐ :ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻮﺍ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Ι
...ﻭﺭﺑﺎﺋﺒﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﺎﺗﻲ ﻓﻲ ﻮﺭﻛﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺴﺎﺋﻜﻢ [ 4،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻫﺒ ﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣـﻦ ﺃﻫـﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠـﻢ ﺇﱃ
5
ﺏ ﰲ ﺣﺠﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ، ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻧﻜﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴﺒﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺮ ﱠ
6
ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺎﻫﲑ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻳﻌﺘ ﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻭ ﻠﻮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺘﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻌﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﲔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﻭﺍ ـﻮ
ﻔﺘﻢ ﺃﻟﺎ ﻳﻘﻴﻤﺎ ﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺟﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ Υﻗﺎﻝ ...]:ﻓ
ﺍﻓﺘﺪﺕ ﺑﻪ[...؛ 7ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻠﻊ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍ ﻮ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻨﻊ
8
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻪ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﺎﺯﺭﻱ :ﺍ ﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻔﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ) ،(441/1ﻳﺘﺠﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﺍ ﻄﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻠﻴ ،ﻻ ﺍﻟﺮﻓ
ﺑﺎﻟﱠﻨﺎﺳﻲ؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(255/1ﺍﻹﺳﻨﻮﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ.252 ،
2ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍﺀ.31 :
3ـ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ).(140/5
4ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ.23 :
5ـ ﺒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ τﺑﺴﻨﺪ ﺎﺑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﺗﻌﻘﺐ ﺣﻠﻮﻟﻮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻪ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻻ ﻧﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﻷﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﺃﻱ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺣ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﻋﻨﻪ".
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ :ﺍ ﻠﻰ ) ،(75/11ﺍﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ :ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ﺍﻟﻌ ﻴﻢ ) ،(626/1ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ :ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ).(99/1
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(378/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ )(491/3
7ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ.229 :
8ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(194/1ﺍﻹﺳﻨﻮﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ،250 ،ﺍﻹﳚﻲ :ﺷﺮ ﺘـﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺘـﻬﻰ
).(174/2
72
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ 1،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧﺎﻟ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﰲ
ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻠﻮﻩ ﺃﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻭﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ،ﻭﻳﺄ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺭﺃﺱ
2
ﻫ ﻻﺀ ﺍﳉﻮﻳ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ،ﻭﲢﻘﻴ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻻ ﺘﻤﻠﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮﺿﻊ.
5ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﻴﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﲑ :ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ] :ﻳﺎ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﻻ
ﺗ ﻛﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎ ﺃﺿﻌﺎﻓﺎ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﺗﻘﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻟﻌﻠﻜﻢ ﺗﻔﻠﺤﻮ [ 3،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻔﻬﻮﻣـﻪ ﻠـﺔ ﻣـﻦ
4
ﺍ ﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ؛ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻮﻳﺔ ﺍ ﻌﺘﺪﻟﺔ!.
ﻭﻳُﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻻ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻟﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺳﻴ ﻣﺴﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﻴﻊ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍ ﺮﺍﺑﲔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺳﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻗﺼﻤﻨﺎﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺣﺶ
ﺳﺘﻤﺎﺋﺔ ﺑﺎ ﺎﺋﺔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺃﺿﻌﺎﻓﺎ ﻊ ﻭﺃﻗﻠﻪ ﻼ ﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﺔ ﺿﻌ ﺍﻟﺜﻼ ﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍ ﺮﻡ ﺑﻨـﺎﺀ
5
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻳﻬﻢ ﺳﺘﻤﺎﺋﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻋﺎﻗﻞ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ.
6ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺑﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌ ﻴﻢ :ﻛﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﺇ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﺍﺛﻨـﺎ ﻋـﺸﺮ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺮﻡ ﺫﻟ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻓﻼ ﺗ ﻠﻤـﻮﺍ ﺷﻬﺮﺍ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻠ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟ ﺭ
ﺺ ﺍﷲ Υﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﳊﺮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ،ﻭ ﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟ ﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻬـﺎ
ﻓﻴﻬﻦ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻜﻢ 6،[...ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧ ﱠ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎ ﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟ ﻠﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ؛ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﱠﺄﻭﻳﻞ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ
7
ﻮﺫﺝ ﻹﻫﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺘﻌ ﻴﻢ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ :ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ،416 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﺝ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﺒﲑ ) ،(115/1ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷـﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ) ،(322/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ) ،(1065/3ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎ :ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻞ.252 ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ) ،(178/1ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﻨ ﻮﻝ ،218 ،ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ) ،(323/1ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ:
ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ 214 ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ) ،(74/2ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ :ﺍﻹ ﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺷﺮ ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ ).(373/1
3ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ.130 :
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻟﻮﺱ :ﺣﻜﻢ ﻭﺩﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﻙ.109 ،
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻷﺷﻘﺮ :ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎ ﻭﺃ ﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎ .65 ،
6ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ.36 :
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮ :ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(116/8ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ:ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ـﻨﲑ ) ،(492/3ﺍﻟﻌﻄـﺎﺭ:
ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ) ،(323/1ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،305 ،ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ).(108/1
73
7ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺑﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎ :ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻮﺍ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ]:Ιﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬ ﺳﺨﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ﻟﺘـ ﻛﻠﻮﺍ
ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﺤﻤﺎ ﻃﺮﻳﺎ 1، [...ﻓﻼ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠ ﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ
2
ﻛﻐﲑﻩ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺮﺍﻭﺓ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺳﻴﺎ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻥ.
8ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺑﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻜ ﲑ ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺎﻟ ﺔ :ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﺍﺳﺘ ﻔﺮ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﺴﺘ ﻔﺮ
ﻟﻬﻢ ﺇ ﺗﺴﺘ ﻔﺮ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺳﺒﻌ ﻣﺮﺓ ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳ ﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺫﻟ ﺑ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻛﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻪ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻬﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﻘ [ 3،ﻓﻼ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﻳ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍ ﻐﻔـﺮﺓ ﺑﻌـﺪ
4
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﲔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺒﻌﲔ ﺗﻴ ﻴﺴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻐﻔﺮﺓ ،ﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻼﻓﻬﺎ.
9ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﳌﺪ :ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ] :Ιﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﺀﻭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ
ﺍ ﻔﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻟ ﻮﺍﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺳﺒﻘﻮﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﻟ ﳝﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺗ ﻌﻞ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻨﺎ ﻠﺎ ﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﻧـ ﺭ ﻭﻑ
ﺭ ﻴﻢ [ 5،ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺻ ﺑﺴﺒﻘﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻹ ﺎﻥ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻠﻤﺪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﻔﺎﺭ
ﻟﻐﲑﻫﻢ.
ﺍﳊ Ψﺑﺎﻟ ﱠﺮ ﺔ ﻣﺜﻼ ،ﻻ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺻﻔﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ 6،ﻓﺎﺗﺼﺎ
ﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻠ ﱠﻢ ﺟﺮﱠﺍ.
10ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻤﻴﻢ :ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ...]:Ιﻭﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻗـﺪﻳﺮ
[ 7،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ Ιﻻ ﻳﻘﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻌﺪﻭﻡ ﻭﺍ ﻤﻜﻦ ،ﻷﻧﱠﻬﻤـﺎ ﻟﻴـﺴﺎ ﺑـﺸﻲﺀ؛ ﻷﻥ
8
ﺍ ﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﱠﻌﻤﻴﻢ.
74
ﺮ :ﻭﺍ ﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻼ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺧُﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ 11ــ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ
ﺑﻮﺭﻭﺩﻩ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺧﺮ ﻓﻼ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺣﻴﻨ ﺬ ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ،ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻮﺍ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ...] :Υﻭﻻ ﺗﺒﺎﺷﺮﻭﻫﻦ
ﳑﻨﻮ ﻭﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﻋﺎﻛﻔﻮ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﺟﺪ" 1،[...ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺟﺪ ﻻ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻟﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﻌﺘﻜ
2
ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ".
12ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺍﻗﻊ :ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳊـ ] :Ψﻻ ﻳﺘﺨـﺬ ﺍﻟﻤ ﻣﻨـﻮ
ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﺃﻭﻟﻴﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻟﻤ ﻣﻨ 3،[...ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧﺰﻟ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻄﻨﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﻔﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭ ﻟﻴﻔﺘﻨﻮﻫﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻳﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻓﻨﻬﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ﺃﻭﻟ ﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺒﺎ ﻨﺘـﻬﻢ ﻓـﺄﺑﻮﺍ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ؛ ﻓﺄﻧﺰﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ،ﻓﻨـﺰﻟ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻧﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ،ﻭﻟـﻴ
4
ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻻﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ،ﻭﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﻻﺓ ﺍ ﻣﻨﲔ ﻣﻨﺪﻭﺣﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ.
ﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ :ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ ρﻣ ﱠﺮ ﺑﺸﺎﺓ ﻣﻴﻤﻮﻧﺔ ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ" :ﺩﺑﺎﻏﻬـﺎ 13ـ ﺃﻻ ﺘ
6
ﻬﻮﺭﻩ" 5،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﻔﻲ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺍ ﻘﻴﱠﺪ.
ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﺭﺩﻓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺗﺸﺎ ﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﻛﺒﲑ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ
ﺩﻗﻴ ؛ ﻧﺒﱠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺎﺩ ﺔ؛ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺩ ﺔ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ
7
ﺧﺼﻮ ﺍ ﺼﻮ ،ﻼ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍ ﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ".
75
14ــ ﺃﻻ ﻳ ﺩ ﺇ ﺇﺳﻘﺎ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ :ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " : ρﻻﺗﺒﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ" 1،ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻪ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻌﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﺎﺋﺒﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ،ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻊ ﺎ
ﻟﻴ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ،ﻓﻴﻔﻀﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻘﻮ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻜﻢ ﺑﺴﻘﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺇ ﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻧﺒﻘﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ
2
ﻓﺮ ﻟﻠ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺑﺎﻹﺳﻘﺎ .
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻓﺄﺑﻄﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺘﺠﲔ
ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﺪﻳ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋـﻦ ﺑﻴـﻊ
ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺮﺓ ﺣ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺻﻼﺣﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺑﺎﺣﺔ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﺼﺮﻡ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺼﺮﻡ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﻟﻠﻄﺒ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ..." :
..ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺎﻟ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻌﻠ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺃﻧﺘﻢ ]ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ[ ،ﻭ ﻦ ﻓﻤـﻦ
ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻓﺈﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺑﺈﺳـﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻨـﻀ ،
ﻭﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻳ ﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺳﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻀ ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺼﺮﻡ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺑﻴﻌﻪ ،ﻟﺰﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﺜـﻞ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻛﻬﺔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻳﻔﺮ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺑﻄﻠﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﻛﻪ
3
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻄ ".
ﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺃﺣـﺪ ﺎ ﻭﰲ ﻣﻮ ﻦ ﺧﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻓﺼﻞ :ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﻠ
ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻄ ﻭﺍ ﺧﺮ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺎﺭﺏ ﺍ ـﺴﻠﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﺒﺪﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺫﻣﻴﺎ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺑﻪ ،ﺎ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨ ρﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ " :ﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﻗﺘﻠﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﺪ
ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺟﺪﻋﻨﺎﻩ" 4،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ،ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺑﻪ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟـﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ :
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺠﱠﺔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﺒﺪ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺑﻪ.
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻳﺒﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،3503ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴـﻮ ،
ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺍﻫﻴﺔ ﺑﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1232 :ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺋﻊ ،ﺭﻗـﻢ
،4613ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺍ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،2187ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﺍﻡ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ ،108 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(272/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷـﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛـﺐ ﺍ ـﻨﲑ
) ،(495/3ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.306 ،
3ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(144/6ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ :ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻳُﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎ .
4ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،4515ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1414ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﺎﻣﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﱃ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،4736ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺔ
ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻫﻞ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺍﳊﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺒﺪ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ، ،2663ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺮﺓ ﺑﻦ ﺟﻨﺪﺏ ،ﻭﺿﻌﻔﻪ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎ .
76
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻦ ﻻ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ
ﻓﺈﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻳﻌﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻄ ؛ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻋﺎﺭ ﻧﻄﻘﻪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻟﻮ
ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﻧﱠﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﺒﺪ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ،ﻟﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻧﱠﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺑﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺑﻌﺒﺪ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﺒﺄﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺑﻌﺒﺪﻩ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻭﺃﺣﺮ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳ ﺩﻱ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺑﻄـﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﻨﻄ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺃ ﱠﺩ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﻧﻄﻘﻪ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻄﻞ؛ ﻷﻥ ﰲ ﺇﺑﻄـﺎﻝ ﻧﻄﻘـﻪ
1
ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻟﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻓﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ".
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ :ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻣـﺎ 15ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻜﻮ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻮ ﳏﻞ ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻓﻴﺰﺍﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻨﺼﻴ
ﻧُﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻛﻔﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺄ ،ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻧﺺ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺣ ﻳﺮﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻫﱠﻢ
ﺑﺴﻘﻮ ﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍ ﻄ ؛ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻄﺄ ﻣﻌﻔﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻘﻴﻴـﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻄـﺄ
2
ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪ ﻭﺍ ﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭﺓ.
ﺪﻩ ﺪﺍ ﻟﻠﻘﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ :ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟـﻨ " :ρـ 16ــ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻜﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ
ﻓﻮﺍﺳ ﻳﻘﺘﻠﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﻡ 3،"...ﻓﻼ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻣـﻦ
4
ﱠﻦ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫ ﱠﻦ. ﻗﺘﻞ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﱠﺎﺭ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻫ ﱠﻦ ﻷﺫﻳﺘﻬﻦﱠ ،ﻓﻴﻠ
5
17ــ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﻟﺴ ﺍﻝ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﻴﺪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧ ﱠ
ﺺ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠـﻢ،
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺘﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨ " :ρﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﺜ ﻣﺜ "؛ 6ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧُﺴﺐ ﻹﺳ ﺎ ﺑﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ
.61 1ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ ،106 ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺧﺮ ﺃﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﲡﻨﺒﺎ ﻟﻠﻄﻮﻝ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ :ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ.418 ،
3ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳊ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺍ ﺮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺏ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،93ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺏ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺍ ﺮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺏ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1829ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳊ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺪﺏ ﻟﻠﻤ ﺮﻡ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .1198ﻣـﻦ
ﺣﺪﻳ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ.
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ :ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ.419 ،
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﺝ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﺒﲑ ) ،(116/1ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺧﺸﻲ :ﻣﻨﺎﻫ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ) ،(426/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻـﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ) ،(1067/3ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ) ،(323/1ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ).(107/1
6ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺗﺮ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،13ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣـﺎ ﺟـﺎﺀ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،990ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻓﺮﻳﻦ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﺜ ﻣﺜ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،749ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ.
77
ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ،ﻓﺎﺳﺘ ﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ﺭﺑﺎﻋﻴﺔ ،ﻟﻜ ﱠﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻳﻌﺘ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣـﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻫـﺬﺍ
1
ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺳ ﺍﻝ ﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ.
ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳُﺴﺄﻝ ﻋﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﺑﻨﻪ؛ ﻓﻴﺠﻴﺐ " :ﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﺑﻨﻪ ﻓﻼ
2
ﻗﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؛ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺷﺮ ﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺏ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ؛ ﻭﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺩ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻩ".
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻳ ِﺮﺩُ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﱠﻔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌ ﺓ ﺑﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ
3
ﻻ ﺼﻮ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ،ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺗﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺑـﲔ ﺻـﻨﻴﻌﻬﻢ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺧﺎ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺳ ﺍﻝ ﺧﺎ ،ﻓﺄﺟـﺎﺏ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﺎ ﺣﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺃﺿﻌ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ؛ ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﻊ ﺜـﻞ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﻭ ﻮﻩ ،ﻼ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻗﻮ ﰲ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ،ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﺍﺩﱠﻋ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛـﻞ
4
ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﱠﺔ ،ﻭﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎ .
ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ ﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻭﻟﻌـﻞ ﺍﻟﻔـﺮ ﺃﻥ
ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﺗﺴﻘ ﺑﺄﺩ ﻗﺮﻳﻨﺔ ،ﻼ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ" 5،ﻭﺗﻌﻘﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﻟـﻪ:
"ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﺮ ﻗﻮﻱ؛ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﰲ ﺍ ﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻟ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ،ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍ ﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻟ ﺩﻻﻟﺘـﻬﺎ
6
ﻗﻮﻳﱠﺔ ﺗﻠ ﻘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻻﻻ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻴﺔ ﻓﻼ ".
ﻗﻠ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴ ،ﻭﻳﻌﻀﺪ ُﻩ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺘﺠﲔ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺃﺟﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺣﻜـﺎﻡ
7
ﺍ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻘﻀﻮﺍ ﻮﺍﺯ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ـ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﻄﻮ ـ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
ﻜﻤﻪ ﻋﻠ ﺻﻔﺔ ﲑ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩﺓ :ﻓﺎﻟـﺼﻔﺔ ﻏـﲑ 18ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻜﻮ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻮ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠ
ﺍ ﻘﺼﻮﺩﺓ ﻻ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻮﺍ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ] :Ιﻟﺎ ﺟﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺇ ﻃﻠﻘﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻟـﻢ
78
ﺗﻤﺴﻮﻫﻦ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻔﺮﺿﻮﺍ ﻟﻬﻦ ﻓﺮﻳﻀﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﻌﻮﻫﻦ ﻋﻠ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺳﻊ ﻗﺪﺭﻩ ﻭﻋﻠ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﻩ ﻣﺘﺎﻋﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻌﺮﻭﻑ
ﱠ ،ﻭﺇﳚﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺘﻌﺔ ﺗﺒﻌـﺎ" 2،ﻭﻻ ﻘﺎ ﻋﻠ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺴﻨ [" 1،ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﳊﺮﺝ ﻋﻤﱠﻦ ﻠ ﻭ
ﻳﻌ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺣ ﻣﻦ ﻠ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻣ ﱠ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺮ ﺍ ﻬﺮ.
19ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﻋﻠ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻮ :ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍ ﺎ ﺐُ ﻋﺎ ﺎ ﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻓﺔ ،ﻭﳚﻬﻞ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻓﻴﺬﻛﺮ ﻟﻪ.
3
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻳُﺘﺼﻮﱠﺭ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﷲ Ιﺃﻭ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ρﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻓﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ.
79
ﻗﺴﻤﲔ؛ ﺷﺮﻭ ﻋﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻭﺗﺸﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﺜﻼ ﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﺷﺮﻭ ﻋﺎﺋـﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ
1
ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺗﻨﺘ ﻢ ﲢﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭ .
ﻭ ﺯُﺑﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻳﻄﻠﻘﻮﺍ ﺍﻷﻋﻨﱠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻬﻢ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﺑﻞ ﺯﻣﻮﻩ
ﺑﻘﻴﻮﺩ ﻣ ﱠﺮ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻭ ﻜﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎ ﺎ ﰲ ﺑﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﻛﺒﲑﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺎ:
ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ؛ ﻛﺎ ﻨﻄﻮ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺧﺎ ﺃ ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻌﺎﺭ
ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻛﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺺ.
ﺏ ـ ﺃﻻ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﺧﺮ ،ﻏﲑ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ
2
ﻋﻦ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ.
80
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻨ ﻮ ﻣﻨ ﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺎﻣﺎ ،ﺑﻠﻪ ﺇﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﻮﺍﻓ ﺧﺼﻤﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣـﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋـﻞ:
"...ﻭ ﺎﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮﻳﲔ؛ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻗﻀﻴﱠﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻚ ﻣـﺎ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻚ ﺣﻜﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓ ﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺎﻟ ﺎ ،ﻟﻜ ﱠﻦ ﻛﻞ
1
ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﻗﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻪ".
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺒ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑ ﱠﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺪ ﺃ ﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ،ﻭﺃﺳﺒﺎﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻣﺎ ﺳﻴ ﻬﺮ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ .
81
1
ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ".
ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻗﺮﱠﺭﻩ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ..." :ﻭ ﻠﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﻗـﺪ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓـﻲ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓـﻲ ﻓﺮ ﻣﻦ
2
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ".
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺩﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ،ﻓﺈﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﻴﱠﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﱄ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ،
ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺷﺮ ﺘﻬﺪ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﺄﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳـﺴﻮﻗﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻨﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟ .
ﻟﻜ ﱠﻦ ﺍﻟﺴ ﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻄﺮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ؛ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟ ﺩﻓﻌﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮﻗ ،ﻭﻣﻦ
ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺗﺒﱠﻴﻦ ﱄ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺣﺪ ﻼ :
ﺃ ـ ﺗﺄ ﺮﻩ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﺘﻠﻤﺬ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻬﻢ؛ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺳﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻨﺎ .
ﺏ ـ ﺗﺄ ﺮﻩ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺳﻠﻜﻮﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻚ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻣﺜﻼ.
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺮﺗﻪ ﻟﻪ. ﺝ ـ ﺗﺄ ﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺧﺼﻮ
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ؛ ﻓﻼ ﺟـﺮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻟﺘـﺄ ﺮﻩ ﻭﺃﺭﺟﺢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ
ﺼﻨﱠﻔﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﺿﻠﻌﺎ ﰲ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻬ ،ﺧﺎﺻﱠﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻣـﻦ ﻗـﻮﱠﺓ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ﺍﻟ ﲡﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﱠﺍﺭﺱ ﻟﻜﺘﺒﻪ ﺟﺮﱠﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﺬﻫﺒﻪ ،ﻭﻧ ﺮﺍ ﻷﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﻣﻔﻘﻮﺩﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻧﻮ ﺎﺯﻓﺔ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﱠﻧ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍ ﻼﻋﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﻗﻼ
ﺟﺰﻣ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ،ﻓﺒﺈﻣﻌﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﺮ ﰲ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﺟﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻰ ﺑﺎﳊﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺘﺄ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍ ﻨﻪ ،ﺑﻞ
ﺣ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﻓﺘﺄ ﺮﻩ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺎ ﺯﺑﺮﻩُ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﻛﺒﲑ.
1ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﻓﺔ :ﺃﺳ ﻠﺔ ﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺮﻧﺎ ﺔ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍ ﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻌﺮﺏ ).(377/6
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻳﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺸﲑ ﺬﺍ ،ﻭﳑﻦ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﺍ ﻘﺮﻱ ،ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺷﺮﺣﺎ ﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺗﻪ؛ "ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻻ ُﻳ ﺮﱠﺝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺑﻪ":
"ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮﻳ ﻭﺍﻹﻟﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﻄﺮﻳ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺍ ﻌﺼﻮﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍ ﻘﻘﲔ؛ ﻹﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﻠﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔـﺎﺭ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻟﺰﺍﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺎ ﻳﻨﺎﻓﻴﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﺇﺑﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻌﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﻮ ﺃﻗﻮ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻜ ﺇﱃ
ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺪ ﰲ ﺍ ﻼ " .ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ) ،(348/1ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺭﻗﻢ .120
2ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ ،42 ،ﻭﻗﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﺼ ﻴﻔﺔ ﺭﻗﻢ 91ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ.
82
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﻠﺒﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ،ﻓﺴﻴﺄ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ
ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻡ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ؛ ﻗﺪ ﻛـﺴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺟﺰ ﺍﳉﻤﻮﺩ ﺍ ﺬﻫ ﰲ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ،ﺧﺎﺻﱠﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻌـﺼﺐ ﻓﻴﻬـﺎ
ﻭﻓ ﱠﺮ .
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺃﺛﺮ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ:
ﺇﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷ ﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺃ ـﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴـﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺣﻘﻴ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳُﺪﺭﺝ ﰲ ﻣﺒﺎﺣ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ.
ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳ ﻛﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺘﺠﲔ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃ ﺪ
ﺻﻔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ﷲ Ι؛ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ] :Υﺇﺫ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟ ﺑﻴﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑـ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﰲ ﺇ ﺒﺎ
ﻟﻢ ﺗﻌﺒﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺒﺼﺮ ﻭﻻ ﻳ ﻨﻲ ﻋﻨ ﺷﻴ ﺎ[؛ 1ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺃ ـﺪ" :ﻓﺜﺒـ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻴـﻊ
2
ﺑﺼﲑ".
ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻧﻪ؛ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺮﺗﱠﺒ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭﺍ ﻟﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻟﻔﻴ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺒ
ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ،ﻭﺗﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ :
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ: ﺼﻴ 1ـ
83
ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜ ،ﻭﻻ ﻔﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻠﲔ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟـﻪ؛ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣـﻦ
1
ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﻭﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺍ ﺧﺮ".
ﻭﺍ ﻌ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻜﻢ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣـﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺣـﺪﻩ ﻭﻓﻘـﺎ
ﻼﺑﺴﺎ ﺎ ،ﻣﻊ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺇﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺺ ﻭﺍﺳـﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣـﻦ
ﺇ ﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺍ ﺮﺍﺣﻪ.
ﺇﺫﺍ ُﻋﻠِﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍ ﺼﺼﺎ ﻟﻠﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻭﻓﺎﻗـﺎ
ﻟﻠ ﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻋ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻨـﺎ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ..." :ﻷﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻟﻴ
ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ...ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻛﺎﻟﻨﻄ ﰲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻬﲔ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍ ﺧﺮ ،ﻓﺄﻳﻬﻤﺎ
2
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ".
ﻭﺑﻨ ﺮﺓ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻧُﺪﺭﻙ ﺑﺄﺩ ﺗﺄﻣﻞ ﺇﻋﺮﺍﺿﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻟﻴـﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺼﺼﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻘﻞ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ﻭ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺟﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺧﻔﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨ ρﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻟﻠ ﻜﻢ ،ﻭﺑﻐﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﻪ،
ﻟﻜﻨﱠﻪ ﻳﻌﺮﺝ ﺃﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻣﻌﻨﱠﺎ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺼـﺼﺎ ﺍ ﺘـﺼﻠﺔ،
ﺃﺩﺭﻛﻨﺎ ﺎ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍ ﺼﺼﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﺍ ﺼﺺ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻋﺮ
3
ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ،ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮﻩ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﻨﺼُﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﺼﺼﺎ ﺍ ﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺑﺎ ﺘﺼﻞ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﻜﻤﲔ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﺿﲔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ
ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻭﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ،ﻓﻴ ﺺ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﺍ ﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻧﻔﻮﺍ ﺣﺠﻴﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻠـﻴ
1ـ ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(420/1ﻭﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺃ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ:
ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻻ ﺼﺺ ﺑﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻣﻨﻄﻮ ،ﻭﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﻟﻮ ﺼﺼﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻟﻠـﺰﻡ
ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻠﲔ ،ﻭﺇﻋﻤﺎ ﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻭﱃ" .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻌﺮﺏ ).(19/2
2ـ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ ،840 ،ﻭﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ ﰲ ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.272 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) (285 -267/1ﻭ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ 199 ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ.
84
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﻄـﻮ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻳﻌﺎﺭ
1
ﻣﻌﺎﺭ ﻟﻪ.
:ﻷﻥ ﻣﺄﺧﺬ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻟـﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺏ ـ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﻴ
2
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺠﻴﺘﻪ ،ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﻗﺎﻟ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴـﺔ ﺃﻳـﻀﺎ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻻ ﺘ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻴ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ.
ﻞ ﺍﳌﻄﻠ ﻋﻠ ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺪ 2ـ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﻭﺍ ﺧﺮ ﻣﻘﻴﺪﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﻌﱠﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ
ﳊﻤﻞ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻞ ﺧﻼ ،ﻭﻟﻦ ﺃﺟﺘﺮﱠ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻤ ﻠﻪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ.
ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮ ﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺄﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﻞ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪ؛ ﻟﻜﻮ ﺎ ﺫﺍ ﺻﻠﺔ
ﻭ ﻴﻘﺔ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺗﻔ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻼ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻲ:
ﺃ ـ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺗ ﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ُﻳ ﻤﻞ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ؛ ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺍﻹ ـﻼ
3
ﰲ ﲢﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﱠﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻡ ﺍ ﺴﻔﻮ .
ﺏ ــ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ؛ ﻓﻼ ﻤﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺧﺮ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ،ﻭﺣﻜـﺎﻩ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺇ ﺎﻋﺎ ،ﻓﻼ ﻤﻞ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺇ ﻼ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﰲ ﻳﺔ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻗﺔ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺮﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ
4
ﰲ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮﺀ.
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﱠﺗ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ،ﻓﻼ ﻞ ﰲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻓﻼ ﲢﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺝ ـ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻠ
5
ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻤﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮﺀ.
ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﺘﲔ ،ﻭ ﺎ:
.425 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(256/3ﺑﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ :ﺗﻴﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮﻳﺮ ) ،(100/1ﺷﻠ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺮﻗﻨﺪﻱ :ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،306 ،ﺭﺍﺟﺢ :ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.216 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ،209 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺿﺔ ،230 ،ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ،
،279ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ).(323/1
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(4/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ،209 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺿﺔ،232 ،
ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،279 ،ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ).(325/1
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(4/3ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ ،280 ،ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ).(326/1
85
ﺃ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹ ﻼ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻭﺍ ﻮﺿﻮ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﳊﻤﻞ ،ﻭﺫﻫﺒ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺇﻟـﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ،ﺑﻞ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﺎ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻗﺪ
1
ﺗﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﻓﻼ ﺗﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ.
ﺏ ــ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘ ﺪﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭ ﺘﻠﻔﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ،ﻓﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻭﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ﻋـﻦ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ،ﻓﻴﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻄﻠ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ،ﻭﺑﺎ ﻘﻴﺪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ؛ "ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ
2
ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ".
ﻭﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺍ ﻼ
ﰲ ﺮﻳﻘﻪ ،ﻓﺒﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ،ﻭ ﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﺟﻌﻠﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺑﺘﻮﻓﺮ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ :ﻞ ﺍﻹ ﻼ ﰲ ﻛﻔﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟ ﻬﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻷ ﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻗﺒـﺔ
3
ﺍ ﻣﻨﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻔﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﺧﻄﺄ.
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻻ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄ :
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻫﲑ ،ﺣﻴ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺃ ـ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﱠﺗ ﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻳﺮ ﺧﻼ
ﺻ ﱠﺮ ﺬﺍ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ..." :ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪﺓ ،ﻣ ﻭﺭﺩﺗﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﺘﻌﻠ
4
ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻓﺈﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻤﻞ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇ ﻼﻗﻪ ،ﻭﺍ ﻘﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﺪﻩ".
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻻ ﺘ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﻌﻠﻼ ..." :ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻤﻞ ﻛـﻞ
ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻻ ﺍﺗﻔﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻞ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﺎﺏ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺳﲑﺩ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿـﻌﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻧﱠـﻪ ﻟـﻴ ﺑـﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻘـﻊ ﺑـﻪ
5
ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ."...
،141ﺷـﻠ :ﺃﺻـﻮﻝ 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛﺸ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺍﺭ ) ،(429/2ﺍﻟﻼﻣﺸﻲ :ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ،
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،404 ،ﺍ ﻦ :ﺃ ﺮ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ .260 ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ.209 ،
،279 3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(5/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺿﺔ ،231 ،ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷـﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ـﻮﻝ،
ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ) ،(325/1ﺍﻟﺮﻳ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ.203 ،
4ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ).(114/5
5ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(286/1
86
ﻓﺎﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﳊﻤـﻞ ﰲ
1
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻣﺒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ.
ﺏ ـ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺃﻭﱃ.
ﺝ ـ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﲢﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺒﱠﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﻜﻮ ﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻨﺴﲔ ﺘﻠﻔﲔ،
ﻭﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﺎﳉﻨ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ":ﻓﺎ ﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻻ ﻤﻞ ﻋﻠـﻰ
2
ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺍﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺩ ،ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻹ ﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ".
ﺩ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹ ﻼ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻭﺍ ﻮﺿﻮ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ؛ ﻓـﺄﺭ
ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺃﻭﱃ ،ﺍﻟﻠﻬ ﱠﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺇﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ.
ﺫ ــ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘ ﺪﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭ ﺘﻠﻔﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ؛ ﻓﲑ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﺍﺑـﻦ ﻧـﺼﺮ ﻭﺃ
ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﻭﺃ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻨﺎ " ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻻ ﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻘﻴـﺪ؛ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳـﺪﻝ
3
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﺪﻩ ﻓﻴﻠ ﺑﺎ ﻘﻴﺪ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﺎ".
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻮﺍﺯ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺻﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ
4
ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﳑﻦ ﻳﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺻﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺃ ﺮﺍ ﻭﺍﺿ ﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ.
ﻧﺴ 3ـ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍ ﻬﻤﱠﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺗﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺍ ﻼ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻟﻴﺴ ﻧﺴ ﺎ ،ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻔ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ
5
ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻧﺴ .
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ:ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ،209 ،ﺍﻟﺰ ﺎ :ﺮﻳ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ.231 ،
2ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(286/1ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﻣﻌﻠﻼ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ" :ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮ ﻪ ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ،
ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺘﻠ " ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺿﺔ.232 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(287/1
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(116/2ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(271/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺿﺔ.231 ،
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺭ :ﺍ ﻘﺪﻣﺔ ،146 ،ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،94 ،ﺍﻟﺰ ﺎ :ﺮﻳ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻝ،
،57ﺍﳉﺼﺎ :ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(407/1ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.332 ،
87
ﺼﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻏﻴﱠﺮ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ ،ﻭ ﱠ
ﺍ ﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﻧﻘﻠﺐ ﻏﲑ ﺰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺰﺋﺎ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺴ ﺎ؛ ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﺻﻼﺓ
ﺍﳊﻀﺮ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺭﻛﻌﺘﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺼﺎﺭ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺎ؛ ﻓﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﻨﺘﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺰﺋﺘﲔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ
ﻛﺎﻧﺘﺎ ﺰﺋﺘﲔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺭﻛﻌﺘﲔ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺳﻼﻣﻪ ﺣ ﻳﺘﻤﱠﻬﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺻ ﱠ
ﺻﻼﺗﻪ؛ ﻓﺜﺒ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻧﺴ .
ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟ ﻻ ﺗﻐﲑ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺰﻳﺪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺮﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺪﻩ؛ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻧﺴ ﺎ؛ ﻛﺄﻥ ﺗﺰﺍﺩ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺳﺎﺩﺳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻜﺘﻮﺑﺎ ﺍ ﻤ ،ﺃﻭ ﺗُﺰﺍﺩ ﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺔ
ﺍ ﻨﺼﻮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺟﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍ ،ﻭﻛﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻭ ﲔ؛ ﻓﺈﻧﱠﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻐﲑ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺰﻳﺪ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻭﺍﻣﺮﺃﺗﺎﻥ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻟﻠ ﻨﻔﻴﺔ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ،
ﻭﻟﻠﺴﻤﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺭ ﻞ ﻧ ﺮ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﻌﺮﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ
1
ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺣﻜﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻻ ﻏﲑ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺑﺄﺩﻟﺔ ﺃ ﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄ :
ﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﻧﻘﻠﺐ ﺑﺎ ﻼ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺻ ﻴ ﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﺒﱠﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ؛ ـ ﺃ
ﺩﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻧُﺴ .
ﺏ ـ ﺃﻥ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺍ ﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻤﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ُﺷ ِﺮ
2
ﺑﺎ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺳﺎﻗ ،ﻓﺪﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺴ ﻪ.
ﺝ ـ ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟ ﻻ ﺗﻐﲑ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻠﻴﺴ ﺑﻨﺴ ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺰﻳﺪ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺻ ﻴ ﺎ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﺯﻳﺪ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺳﺎﺩﺳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻤ ﺍﻟ ﺻﻼﻫﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳُﻄﺎﻟﺐ
ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺎﺩﺳﺔ ﻓﻘ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍ ﻤ ﺍﻟ ﺻﻼﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺯﻳﺪ ﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺔ ﰲ ﺟﻠﺪ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍ ﺎ ﺃﻋﻴﺪ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺔ ،ﻓﺄﻧ ﺗﺮ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ،ﻭ
3
ﺗ ﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﻹﺑﻄﺎﻝ ،ﻓﺪﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴ ﻧﺴ ﺎ.
.146 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) (416/1ﻭﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(205/7ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺭ :ﺍ ﻘﺪﻣﺔ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(417/1
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(420/1
88
ﻟﻜ ﱠﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻴﻨﺎ ﺍ ﻥ ﰲ ﺍ ﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺃ ﺮﺍ ﻭﺍﺿ ﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻧﺴ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻛﺘﻔﻰ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮ ﺭﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻘ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ... " :ﻓﻴﻘﺎﻝ ﻢ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻠﻜﻢ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺰﺍ
]ﻭﰲ ﻧﺴ ﺔ :ﺍﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎ [ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﺍﻟﺰﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺍﻧﻲ ﻓﺎﺟﻠﺪﻭﺍ ﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍ ﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﺋﺔ ﺟﻠﺪﺓ 1،[...ﻳﺘﻀﻤﱠﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻴﲔ :ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍ ﳚﻠﺪ ﻣﺎﺋﺔ.
ﻭﺍ ﺧﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ؛ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻧﻌﻢ ،ﻭﻻﺑ ﱠﺪ ﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻗﻴﻞ ﻢ :ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺔ ﺣﻜﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻫﺎ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﺑﻮﺟﻮ ﺎ ،ﻭﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺔ ﻳ ﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺃﺑﻄﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﻄﻞ
ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻫﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺧﺎ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺘ ﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ
ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ ﻧﺎﺳ ﺎ ﺎ ﻳﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺒ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺧﺎ،
2
ﻭﺑﺎﷲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴ ".
ﻭ ﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻗﻮ ﻢ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﺍﺣﺘﺠﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮ
ﻟﻠﻤﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ؛ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻓﺎﺩ ﺇﳚﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳑﻨﻮﻋﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺴ ،
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻮﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺟﺒﺎ.
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﻄﺄ ﺑﻼ ﺧﻼ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻜﻢ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻣﻨﻊ
ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻟﻪ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻘﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﳊﺪ ﺎﺋﺔ
ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺇﳚﺎﺏ ﺇ ﺎﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺺ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ؛ ﻳﻨﻘﺺ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﳚﺐ ﺇ ﺎﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﳚﻮﺯ
ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺺ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧﺴ ﺎ" 3،ﻭ ﻮﺍﺏ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ
4
ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ.
89
4ـ ﻧﺴ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴ ﺑﻪ:
ﺃ ـ ﻧﺴ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ :ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﻧﺴ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ:
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺃ ﻞ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺿﻤﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳُﻨﺴ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻼ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻴﻪ ﻓ ﻮ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻟﻠﻨﺴ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺣﺠﱠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻄ
1
ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻟﻴ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﻴُﻨﺴ ؛ ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎ ﻻ ﻳُﻨﺴ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻭﻣﺎ
2
ﻟﻴ ﺠﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺰﻳﻞ ﺣﻜﻤﺎ ﺒ ﺠﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳُﻨﺴ ُ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ؛ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺜﺒ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻓﻴﺰﺍﻝ".
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍ ﰲ ﺳﻴﺎ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺴ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺸﻤﻞ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻳﻌﻢ ﺑﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﺘﻪ.
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺎﻟ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻓﻴﺠﻮﺯ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻧﺴ ﻪ ﻭﻧﺴ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ،
ﻛﻤﺎ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻧﺴ ﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ،ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﻧﺴ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻓﻤ ﻞ ﺧﻼ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ،
ﻭﻣﺄﺧﺬ ﺍ ﺎﻧﻌﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻟﻠﻔ ،ﻓﻴﺴﺘ ﻴﻞ ﺳﻘﻮ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ،ﻣﻊ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﻓﺮﻋﻪ
3
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻟ .
ﺍﻟﻨﺴ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ :ﻻ ﻳُﺠﻮ ُﺯ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻟﻴ ـ ﺏ
ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻌﺘ ﻓﻴﻨﺴ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ
4
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ...":ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﻤِﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴ ﺎ ﻟﻴ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ".
ﻭﻟﻨﻔ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﻟﻔﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎ ﻧﺎﺳ ﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻣﺮﱠ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺴ ﺇﺳﻘﺎ
5
ﻟﻠ ﻜﻢ؛ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳚﺰ ﺇﻻ ﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ.
90
ﺑﻐﲑﻫﻢ! ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘ ﻬﺮ ﺑﲔ ﺍ ﺘﺠﲔ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﻴ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺃﺻﻼ ﻞ ﺧﻼ
1
ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﺴ ﺑﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻌ ﺍﻟﻨﻄ .
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ،ﺗﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃ ﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺗ ﻛﺪﻩ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻬﻤﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟ ﺧﺎﻟ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ـ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ـ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ.
،130ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛـﺐ ) ،(580/3ﺍﻟـﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜـﺮ ﺍﻟـﻮﺭﻭﺩ 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ،
).(349/1
91
ﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴ ﻣﻦ ﻴﺚ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﻭﺑﻴﺎ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :
ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻚ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﺍ ﻨﻬ ﺍ ﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ؛
ﻟﺬﺍ ﻓﺴﺘﻨ ﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ،ﻷﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻫﺪﻓﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴ .
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺴﺘ ِﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﻳُﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ؛ ﻭﲢﺮﻳﺮ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱠـﺎﰲ
1
ﻣﺴﺘﺼ ﺐ ﻟ ﺻﻞ ﻓﻼ ﻳُﻄﺎﻟﺐُ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ؛ ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍ ﺜﺒ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣ ﱠﺪ ﻓﺘﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺔ.
.507 ،408ﺷﻠ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ، 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ،
2ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ.80 :
3
ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑ،ﺑﺎﺏ ]ﺍﺳﺘﻐﻔِﺮ ﻟﻬُﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﺴﺘﻐﻔِﺮ ﻟﻬُﻢ ﺇِﻥ ﺗﺴﺘﻐﻔِﺮ ﻟﻬُﻢ ﺳﺒﻌِﲔ ﻣﺮﱠﺓ ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳﻐﻔِﺮ ﺍﻟﻠ ُﻪ
ﻟﻬُﻢ ،[...ﺭﻗﻢ ،4670ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﻤﺮ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 2400ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻟﻪ.
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ) ،(457/2ﺍﻹﳚﻲ :ﺷﺮ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺘـﻬﻰ ) ،(178/2ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛـﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ـﺮ ﺍ ـﻴ
) ،(173/5ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ).(269/3
92
1
ﻭﻗﻠ ﺃﻧﺎ " :ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺸﺮﻙ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺍﳉﱠﻨﺔ".
2
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
2ــ ﻓ ِﻬﻢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ τﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ...]:Υﻓ ﻛﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺇ ﻮﺓ ﻓﻠ ﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺪ [...؛ 3ﺃﻥ
ﻷﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﻠ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﻘ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻟﻴ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﻮﻳﻦ ﺇﺧﻮﺓ" ،ﻭﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
4
ﺻﻔﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﺜﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺇﺧﻮﺓ.
ـ ﺛﺎﻟ ﺎ :ﻓﻬﻢ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻠ ﺔ
ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﺑﻞ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺍ ﻼ ﰲ ﺮﻳ ﺣﺠﻴﱠﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻫﻞ
5
ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ُ ﺃﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ .
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺣﺠﱠﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎﻥ؛ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻢ
ﰲ ﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﻷﺻﻤﻌﻲ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺗﺼ ﻴ ﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﻭﻭﺍﻳـﻦ
ﺍ ﺬﻟﻴﲔ.
ﺼﺺ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻓﺎ ﺑﺎﻟـﺬﻛﺮ ﻓـﺈﻥ ﻣﻘـﺼﺪﻩ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺩﻟﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻟﺮﺃﻳﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧ ﱠ
ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻓﺮ ﲡﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻳﺰﺭﻱ ﺑﺄﻭﺳﺎ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻜﻴ
ﺑﻠﻔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ،!εﻓﺒﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ُﻳ ﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺮ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻟﺰﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻞ ﻛﻼﻣـﻪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳُﻨـﺰﱠﻩ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ،ﻓﺎ ﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍ ﻮﺻـﻮ
ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺻ ﻼﻓﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﻀﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟـﺴﻮﺩﺍﻥ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻄﺸﻮﺍ ﻳﺮﻭﻫﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ،ﻟﻌ ﱠﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻛﻴﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﻫﺠﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻗﻴﻞ :ﻻ ﻣﻌ ﻟـﺬﻛﺮ
6
ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺼﻴﺼﻬﻢ ،ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﺍﻫﻢ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﻢ.
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺋﺰ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺋﺰ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﺮ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1238ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹ ﺎﻥ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺸﺮﻙ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .150
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ) ،(112/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮ :ﺍ ﻔﻬﻢ ) ،(290/1ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ).(156/5
3ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ.11 :
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ) ،(170/1ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﻨ ﻮﻝ ،211 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ).(269/3
ﻭﺍﻷ ﺮ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻪ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﺋﺾ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،7960ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺻ ﻴﺢ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ،ﻭﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫ .
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ) 242/1ﻭ.(245
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ) 169/1ﻭ ،(172ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(525/2
93
ﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ " :ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
1
ﻳﺜﺒ ،ﻓﻼ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺷﻴﺔ ".
ﻭ ﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺣﺠﺔ ﰲ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺣﺘ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻻ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ 2،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨ " :εﱄ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟـﺪ ـﻞ
ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻭﻋﻘﻮﺑﺘﻪ" 3،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﺑﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺪ ﺧﺎ ﱠ
ﺻﺔ ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﺒﲔ ﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ
4
ﻳﻜﻦ ﻭﺍﺟﺪﺍ ﻓﻠﻴ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺒ ﻭﻻ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺣ ﳚﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻀﻲ".
94
ﻭﺍ ﻌ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻗﺪ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻭ ﻳُﻔـﺪﻧﺎ ﺎﻟﻔـﺔ ﺍ ﻨﻄـﻮ
ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻜﻮ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻜ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻧﻔ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻴﺔ.
2ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﺸﺎﻗ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺒﻴﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻬﺪ ﻭﻳﺘﺒﻊ ﻴـﺮ
ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻤ ﻣﻨ ﻧﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﻟ ﻭﻧﺼﻠﻪ ﺟﻬﻨﻢ ﻭﺳﺎﺀﺕ ﻣﺼﲑﺍ[ 1،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ..." :ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌ ﺃﻧﱠـﻪ
ﺃﺣ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻘﺎﺏ ،ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﺒﱠﻴﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺍ ﺪ ﻭﻳﺸﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ،ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫـﺬﻩ
2
ﺻﻔﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ؛ ﳚﺰ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ".
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻌ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻧﻘﺾ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﻠﻤ ﺘﺠﲔ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻴﺪ ﻋُﻠ ﺑﻮﺻ ،ﻳُ ِﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍ ﺘﺼ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ،ﺑﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻌﻜ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻴﺪ ﻳﻌﻢ ﺍﳉﻬﺘﲔ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ُﺧﺼﱠ ﺇﺣﺪﺍ ﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺻ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺍﻗﻊ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣـﻦ
ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﲑ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩ .
ـ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ
1ــ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺪﻳ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺒﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺃﻭ τﻗﺎﻝ " :ﻰ ﺍﻟﻨ εﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﺮ
3
ﺍﻷﺧﻀﺮ ،ﻗﻠ :ﺃﻧﺸﺮﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺾ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ " .
ﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺧﻀﺮ ﻭﺃﻓﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺑـﻦ ﺃ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ" :ﻓﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻧ ﱠ
ﺃﻥ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺾ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺻ ﱠﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻟﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﻪ
4
ﺑﺎ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻻ ﻳﻌﻠ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﳉﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﻀﺮ ،ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨ ." ε
ﻓﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺘ ﱠ ﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﺑﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ.
2ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺎ ﺒ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺮﻭﺓ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﲑ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻗﻠ ﻟﻌﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺯﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﻨ εــ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ
ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﱃ ] :ﺇ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺮﻭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻌﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻠـﻪ ﻳﻮﻣ ﺬ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ـ :ﺃﺭﺃﻳ
ﺍﻟﺒﻴ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺮ ﻓﻼ ﺟﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃ ﻳﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻬﻤﺎ 5،[...ﻓﻤﺎ ﺃﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻓﻤﻦ
ﻤﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻟ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ :ﻛﻼ ،ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﻧ ﻓﻼ ﺟﻨـﺎ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻄ ﱠﻮ
95
ﻤﺎ؛ ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﺰﻟ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻬﻠﻮﻥ ﻨﺎﺓ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧ ﻣﻨﺎﺓ ﺣﺬﻭ ﻗﺪﻳﺪ، ﻳﻄ ﱠﻮ
ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺘ ﺮﺟﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻄﻮﻓﻮﺍ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎ ﻭﺍ ﺮﻭﺓ ،ﻓﻠ ﱠﻤﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺳﺄﻟﻮﺍ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ εﻋﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺄﻧﺰﻝ ﺍﷲ ]:ﺇ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺮﻭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻌﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ،[...ﺍ ﻳﺔ".
1
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ" :ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ،ﲢﻜﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨـﻪ ﺑـﻀﺪ
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺬﺭ ﻋﺮﻭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺪﺍ ﺔ ﺳﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻓﻘﻪ ﺑﻌـﺪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
2
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ؛ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ".
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﳊﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻜﻮ .
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ " :εﻻ ﻮ ﻷﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻼ ـﺔ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻟـﺪ ـ 3
ﻓﻴ ﺘﺴﺒﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻟﻪ ُﺟﻨﱠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺎﺭ" ،ﻓﻘﺎﻟ ﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ :εﻳﺎ ﺭﺳـﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ،ﺃﻭ
3
ﺍ ﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻗﺎﻝ " :ﺃﻭ ﺍ ﻨﺎﻥ ".
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ " :ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﺍ ﺮﺃﺓ :ﻭﺍ ﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻪ ﻋ ﱠﻤﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺎ ﺳﺄﻟﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻜﱠﻨﻬﺎ ﺎ ﺟ ﱠﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺍﻹ ﻨﲔ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﻼ ﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﺎﻟﻔﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺃﺟﺮ ﺍ ﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺜﻼ ﺔ ﺃﻋ ﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟـﺮ
ﺍ ﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺑﺎﻹ ﻨﲔ ،ﺳﺄﻟﺘﻪ ﻓﺄﺧ ﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻴﺐ ﺑﺎ ﻨﲔ ﻳﺒﻠ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺘﺮ
4
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﱠﻨﺠﺎﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺬﺍ ﺎ".
ﻓﻨ ﻦ ﻧﺮ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﺩ ،ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻪ ﻋ ﱠﻤﻦ ﻛـﺎﻥ
ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺗﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﻴﺔ ـ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ـ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻭﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺣ ﺑﺈﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ εﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻬـﻢ ،ﻓﻴﻜـﻮﻥ
ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ.
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ]:ﺇِﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﱠﻔﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺮﻭﺓ ﻣِﻦ ﺷﻌﺎِﺋ ِﺮ ﺍﻟﻠ ِﻪ ،[...ﺭﻗﻢ.4495:
2ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(523/2
3ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺋﺰ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺴﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﺼﻴﺒﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 39ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﺑـﺎﺏ
ﻫﻞ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻟﻠﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،101ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻮ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻟـﺪ
ﻓﻴ ﺘﺴﺒﻪ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،2633ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴ ﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺃ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ.
4ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(507/2
96
ـ ﺛﺎﻟ ﺎ :ﺍﻟﻠ ﺔ
ﺎ، 1ـ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ" :ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍ
ﺒ ﻭﺗﻘ ﱠﺮﺭ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺟﺮ ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺩ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺾ ،ﺃﻭ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻛﺮﻡ ﺯﻳﺪ؛
1
ﻻ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋ ﱠﻤﻦ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ."...
ﻭﻣﻌ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﻻ
ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻟ ﻣﺮ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﻤﺎ ﻼﻥ.
2ــ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ..." :ﻭ ﱠﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺗﻔﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮ ﺑﺈ ﺒﺎ
ﺍﻷ ﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷ ﺎﺀ ﺍﻟ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻮ ،ﻴﻴﺰ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﱠﳑﻦ ﻟﻴ ﻟﻪ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛـﺎﻥ
ﻣﻘﱠﻴﺪﺍ ﺑﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻛﻘﻮﻟﻚ :ﺃﺳﻮﺩ ﻭﺃﺑﻴﺾ ﻭﻗﺎﺗﻞ ،ﺃﻭ ﻟﻘﺒﺎ ﻀﺎ ﻛﻘﻮﻟﻚ :ﺯﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﻭﺧﺎﻟﺪ،
ﻓﻠﻮ ﺩﻝ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻟﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔـﺔ ،ﻭﰲ
2
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ."...
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﻘﺾ ﻛﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ،
ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻣﻬﻢ ﺇﺟﺮﺍ ﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷ ﺎﺀ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺑﺼﻔﺎ ،ﻟﻜﻮ ﺎ ﻻ ﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴ ﱠﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ.
1ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(521/2ﻭﻗﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(336/3ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻱ :ﺍ ﻌﺘﻤـﺪ )،(154/1
ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛﺸ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺍﺭ ).(378/2
2ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ:ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ) ،(521/2ﻭﻗﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ) ،(336/3ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻱ :ﺍ ﻌﺘﻤﺪ ).(154/1
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(344/3ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ 267 ،ﻭﺍ ﻨ ﻮﻝ ،212 ،ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫـﺎﻥ
) ،(170/1ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ )(174/5؛ ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ ﺭﺩﺍ ﻗﻮﻳﺎ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ).(338/8
97
ﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﲔ ﻗﺪ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ..." :ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ﻻ ﺷ ﱠ
ﺺ ﻟﻪ εﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺎﻓﻘﲔ ﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﲔ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻮﺯ ،ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻐﻔﺮ
ﻧ ﱠ
1
ﻢ ﺎ ،ﻭﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﻢ ﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻴ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﻢ".
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬـﻮﺭ ﺍ ـﺘﺠﲔ ﺑـﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻌﺪﻭﺩ ﻼﻓﻪ.
ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻓ ﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ εﻗﺪ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍ ﻐﻔﺮﺓ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻠﺔ؛ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ
ﻻ ﻳُﺸﻔﻊُ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺃﺻﻼ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺮﺝ ﺍﻹﻳﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﻊ ،ﻛﻘﻮﻟـﻚ:
ﺍﺷﻔﻊ ﻟﺰﻳﺪ ﺃﻭﻻ ﺗﺸﻔﻊ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﺷﻔﻌ ﺃﻟ ﻣ ﱠﺮﺓ ﺃﺷﻔﻌﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﲔ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻤ ﻤﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ εﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻼﻓﺎ ﻟﻘﺮﺍﺑﺘﻬﻢ
ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﻮ ﱠﺩ ﻢ ﱠﳑﻦ ﺻ ﱠﺢ ﺇ ﺎ ﻢ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻤﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻋﲔ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﺧﺮﻭﻥ،
2
ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺩﻭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﻮﺭﺍ ﺃﺧﺮ .
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﻴﺐ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺘﲔ؛ ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :εﻷﺯﻳـﺪﻥ"،
ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺎﻟﻔﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺄﱠﻧﻪ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳـﺘﻐﻔﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺣـﺴﻢ
3
ﻤﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ،ﺎ ﺟﺎﺯ ﻟﻪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻡ ،ﻓﻤ ﻤﻞ ﺍ ﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﺇﺫﻥ ﺧﻼ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ.
ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺰﻭﻝ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺃﺳﺘ ﻔﺮﺕ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺃﻡ ﻟﻢ ﺗﺴﺘ ﻔﺮ ﻟﻬﻢ
ﻟﻦ ﻳ ﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻟﻬﻢ 4،[...ﻣﺘﺮﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ ،ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻳﺎﺱ ﻳﺘﻘ ﱠﺪﻡ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟـﺴﺒﻌﲔ
ﺃﺑﻘ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎ ﻟﻠﺮﺟﺎﺀ ،ﻓﻠ ﱠﻤﺎ ﺷﻔﻊ ﺍﻟﻨ εﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﺀ ،ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﺍﷲ Ιﻣﺎ ﺃﻭﺟﺐ ﺍﻹﻳﺎﺱ ﺭﺍﻓﻌﺎ
5
ﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.
98
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻏﲑ ﻣﱠﺘﺠﻪ ،ﻭﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻟﻴﺴ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟ
ﺗﺴﻌﻔﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻨﺸُﺪﻩ ،ﻟﻜ ﱠﻦ ﺿﻌ ﺍﻟﺪﱠﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺿﻌ ﺍ ﺪﻟﻮﻝ.
2ــ ﺍﺳﺘﻀﻌ ﻋﻴﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺪﻳ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ،τﻓﻘﺎﻝ..." :ﻭﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ
ﺑﻪ ﺿﻌ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻴﺰ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻦ ﻣـﺎ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﳉﻨﱠﺔ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﺪﻩ؛ ﻭﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺧﻄﺎﺑﻪ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺻ ﱠﺔ
1
ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺻ ﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ."...
ﻭﺍ ﻌ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻨﱠﺔ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻋﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻨـﺔ،
ﻓﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻨﱠﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﻻ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ 2،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺘﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺃ ﻌﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻴﺾ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻀﺪ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻻ ﻳﻌﻜﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻐﱠﻴﺎﻩ ﻫﻮ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣـﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺣ ﻟﻮ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻢ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎ ﺃﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻔﻴﻨـﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ؛ ﻭﺍﻷ ﺮ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺣﻜـﻢ ﻣـﻦ ﺗﻠـﱠﺒ
ﺑﻮﺻ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ.
3ـ ﺍﻋُﺘ ِﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ τﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎ ؛ ﺃ ﻬﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺣ ﱠ
ﺠﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﺜﺒـﻮ
3
ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻠﻴﻢ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﻴﺾ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ.
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺠﻨﺎ ﺎ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻟﻐﺔ؛ ﻓﺘﻌﻠﻘﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ ﻻ ﺬﻫﺒﻪ،
ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻛﻢ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﻟ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ﰲ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻓﻤـﺮﺩﻭﺩ؛ ﻷﻥ
4
ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍ ﻼ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﺮﺟﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ .
ﻭ ﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻗﺪ ﺃ ﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺎﺋﻊ ﻋﺪﺓ ،ﻭ
1
ﻳﻌﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺎﻟ ،ﻭ ﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﺑﺄﱠﻧﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣُﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ.
99
4ـ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﻔﻬﻢ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺎ ﻳﺄ :
ﺃ ـ ﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺣﺎﺩ ﻭﻻ
ﺻﺔ ﻭﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﻠ ﺑﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻟﻐﻮﱠﻳﺔ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﻨﺒ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺗﺜﺒ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺧﺎ ﱠ
2
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺃﺟﻴﺐ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮ ﻻ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻟﻪ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤـﺎﺀ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺼﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻜﺘﻔﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﻌﺎ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎ ﺑﻨﻘﻞ ﺍ ﺣﺎﺩ ﻋـﻦ
ﺃﺋ ﱠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ؛ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ 3،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺗﻨـ ﱠﺰﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻌﻜﻢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻞ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﺍﻟﺘـﻮﺍﺗﺮ ﻣـﺎ
ﻠﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ،ﻭ ﻦ ﻧ ﱠﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﺑﻞ ﺇﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻟ ﱠﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺑﻘﻮ ﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﺃﻭ ﺎ .
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻛﻢ ،ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﻛﻴ ﺫﻫﺒﺘﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ،
4
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻗﻔﺮ ﺃﺩﻟﺘﻜﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﺍ ﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮ! ،ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻜﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻟﻨﺎ.
ﺏ ــ ﻻ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺾ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻨﺎ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻫﺬﺍ
5
ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﻔﺶ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻢ. ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺒﻮ
ﻭﺃﺟﻴﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ψﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﳑﱠـﻦ
ﺘ ﺑﻠﻐﺘﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﻔﺶ ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺜﺒ ﺒﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟـﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﺃ ﻋﺒﻴـﺪ،
ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻤﺎ ،ﺃﺿ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﺭﺟ ﱠﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤـﺎ
ﻧﺒ ﺍﻷﺧﻔﺶ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨ ﻮ ﻓﻘ .
100
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻧﺎ ،ﻭﺍ ﺜﺒ ﻣﻘ ﱠﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺎﰲ؛
1
ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﺪﺍﻥ ﱠﻨﺎ ،ﻭ ﺎ ﻳﺜﺒ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻋﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻟ ﱠ ﻟﻔﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴـ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ
ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﺇﻥ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻤ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻟﻐﻮ ﻳﻨـ ﱠﺰﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺎ ﻳﺄ :
ﺃ ـ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﺑﺘﻌﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻷ ﺎﺀ؛ ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘـﻪ
2
ﺑﺎﻻﺳﻢ؛ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ".
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻋ ﱠﺪﺓ ﺃﻭﺟﻪ؛ ﺃﻭ ﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ـﺘﺠﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻘـﺐ ﻻ
3
ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ.
4
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻟﻠﻮﺻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺼ ﱠﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻩ.
ﺏ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻭﻗﺎ ﻋ ﱠﺪﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ُ
ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺍ ﺘﺼ ﺎ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﺍﺷﺘﺮ ﳊﻤﺎ ﻣﺸﻮﻳﺎ ،ﻭﺍ ﺸﻮﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻴ
ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺼﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷ ﺎﺀ ﺍ ﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻮ :ﺍﺷﺘﺮ ﳊﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺮﺍ ،ﻭﻻ ﳚﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﻴـﺎ
5
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ.
ﻭﺃﱠﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ..." :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺠ ﱠﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﻣﺜـﻞ ﺍﻷﻟﻘـﺎﺏ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﰲ ﻞ ﻻ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻞ ﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻓﻠﻴ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺍ ﱠﺮﺩ ﺑـﻞ
ﻫﻲ ﻟﻠﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻌ ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻟ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻣﻲ ﺘﻠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺗﻔﺎ ﺍ ﻌﺎ ،ﻭﻻ
ﺻﺔ؛ ﻟﻠﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻳﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺗﻔﺎ ﺍ ﻌ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺗﻘﻊ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﺻﺎ ﺧﺎ ﱠ
6
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺼﻮ ".
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻹﳚﻲ :ﺷﺮ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻬﻰ ) ،(175/2ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ) ،(464/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ )،(274/3
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(1075/3
2ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(525/2ﻭﻗﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ) ،(173/1ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ.269 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ ،222 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(289/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(1076/3
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) 233/1ﻭ ،(304ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﻨ ﻮﻝ 72 ،ﻭﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،266 ،ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ) ،(1076/3ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ ،444 ،ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ).(131/1
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ ،222 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ).(289/3
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ).(248/1
101
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﻢ ﰲ ﻋُﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻻ ﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﻐﲑﻩ،
ﻓﺈﳚﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﻻ ﻨﻊ ﻭﺟﻮ ﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮ ﻣﺜﻼ ،ﻼ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻪ ﻨﻊ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﻪ
ﺑﻀﺪﻫﺎ ،ﻛﺈﳚﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﰲ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻓﺔ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﺩﻝ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟـﻚ
1
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﳚﺎ ﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻓﺔ ،ﺧﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ.
ﻭﳑﱠﺎ ﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ ﺑﺎﻟـﺼﻔﺔ
ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻋﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻻ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺇﻻ ﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻛﺎﻻﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ
ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﻼ ﺑﻼ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ،ﻼ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﺼﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻟﻨـﺴﻨﺪ
2
ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺴﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ.
ﺃﺿ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﻛﺮ ﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘ ﻀﺮ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ،ﻼ ﺍﻟـﺬﺍﻛﺮ
3
ﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺻ ،ﻓﺎﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺘ ﻀﺎﺭﻩ ﳊﻜﻤﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻓﻪ.
ﻟﻜ ﱠﻦ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻓﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ؛ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻻ ﺇﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌِﻠﻴﱠﺔ ،ﻟﻌـﺪﻡ ﺍ ﻨﺎﺳـﺒﺔ،
ﻼ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻓﻔﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﺋ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻳﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﻋـﺪﻡ
4
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺒﻮ ﻋﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﺑﻮﺿﻮ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻹﻟﺰﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟـﺼﻔﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ،ﺑﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻜ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﻠﺒﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺼﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻻ ﻟﻪ.
ﺏ ــ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ" :ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻏﻠ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻜﻢ ﺃﱠﻧﻜـﻢ
ﺗﺘﻮﺻﻠﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻌ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺎ ﺐ ﺑﺎﳊﺎﺻﻞ ﻣـﻦ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗـﻪ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻜ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﻭﻗﻠﺒﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌـﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠـﻢ ﻌـ
5
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻠﻴ ﺎﻫﺮ".
102
ﻭﺃﺟﻴﺐ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﺄﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﺃ ﺒﺘﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﻄﺮﻳ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺀ ﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣـﺎ
ﺃﻓﺎﺩﻧﺎ ﱠﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﻔ ﺳﻮﺍﻩ؛ ﺗﻌﱠﻴﻦ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟ ﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ،
ﻭ ﱠﳑﺎ ﻳ ﻛﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻹ ﺎﺀ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻮﺻ ،ﻟﻮ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻋﻠﺔ ﻓﻴـﻪ ﻟﻜـﺎﻥ
1
ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ،ﻗﺪ ﺒﺘ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﺒﻌﺎﺩ ،ﺭﻏﻢ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﻳﺢ ،ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺃﻭﱃ.
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺑﺄﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻟﻠﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ؛ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﺟﺎﺋﺰ ﻏﲑ ﳑﺘﻨﻊ ﰲ
ﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻹ ﺒﺎ ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻟﻠﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﻭﻗﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﻘـ ﱠﺮﺭ ﺃﻥ
ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﷲ Υﻻ ﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺼﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺳﻮ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻪ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ،
2
ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ.
ﺝ ــ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ..." :ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺎﻟ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﻏﲑ ﻣـﺎ
ﺫﻛﺮ ؛ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﻟﻮﺟﺐ ﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻓﺔ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻻﺟﺘـﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ـﺮ
ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﰲ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﻠﻮﻓﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻔﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻏـﺮ ﺻـ ﻴﺢ
ﻭﺗﻌﺮﻳﺾ ﻟﺜﻮﺍﺏ ﺟﺰﻳﻞ ﻭﺭﻓﻊ ﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﻭﺗﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺩﺭﺟﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﰲ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻓﺔ
ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ ﺺ ﺍﻟـﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﻳﺴ ﻟﻠﻤﺠﺘﻬﺪ ﺇﺳﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺑـﻀﺮﺏ
3
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ".
ﺼﻞ ،ﻓﺄ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍ ﻤﻞ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺷـﺘﺮ ﻨﺎ ﰲ
ﻭ ﻜﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻮﺍﺑﲔ؛ ﻤﻞ ﻭﻣﻔ ﱠ
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺧُﻠ ﱠﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻏﲑ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ
4
ﻣﺘﻮ ﱠﻫﻤﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﺮﻙ ﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍ ﺘﻴﻘﻦ ﻭﺣ ﺍﻟ ﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ.
ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻬﻲ ) ،(175/2ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺧـﺸﻲ :ﻣﻨـﺎﻫ 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ) ،(1076/3ﺍﻹﳚﻲ :ﺷﺮ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ).(428/1
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ.239 ،
،269 3ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(526/2ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(355/3ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ،
ﺍﻹﳚﻲ :ﺷﺮ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻬﻰ ).(176/2
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ.240 ،
103
ﺼﻞ؛ ﻓﺎﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ "...ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺮ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍ ﻔ ﱠ
ﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺣ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﱠﳑﺎ ﻳﻘﻞ :ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺑﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺭﺩﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻞ ﺍﻟﻨـﺰﺍ ؛ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻟﻨـﺰﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻻ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺳﻮ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻟﻠﻤـﺬﻛﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺩﻓـﻊ
1
ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺳﻮﺍﻫﺎ".
ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﻟ ﺻﻞ ﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻞ ﻧﺰﺍﻋﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻣﱠـﺎ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻳﺴﺎﻭ ﻓﻴﺘﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺇﻻ ﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭ ﺼﻮ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ؛ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻌﻰ ﺍ ﺘﻬـﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺇﳊـﺎ
ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻨﻄﻮ ﲢﺼﻴﻼ ﻟﻠﺜﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﳉﺰﻳﻞ ،ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺍﺏ ﻏﲑ ﺣﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ
2
ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺒ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ
1ـ ﻧﻮﻗﺶ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺑ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍﺀ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻟﻪ؛ ﻻ ـﺮﺍﻡ ﺃﺣـﺪ
ﺷﺮﻭ ﻪ ،ﻓﺈ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ،ﺃﻭ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻮﻳـﺔ،
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭ ﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺇ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺍ ﺎ ﺒِﲔ ﺇﻟﻴـﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻤﱠـﺎ
ﻋﻤ ﺑﻠﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ،ﺫﻛِﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻢ ،ﻻ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﻤ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ 3،ﻭﺑﻜـﻞ
ﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻨ ﺃﺳﺘ ﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻬﲔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﲔ.
ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻟﺰﺍﻣﻨﺎ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﻟﻠﻤ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﺃﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﺃﺳﻘﻄﻨﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮﺿﻊ
ﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺍ ﻌﺎﺭ ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺩﺍﻝ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺣﻴ ﲡﺮﱠﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺋﻦ ،ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ
ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ ﺣﻴ ﲡﺮﱠﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺼﺼﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘـﺪ ﰲ ﺣﺠﻴﺘـﻪ
4
ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ﺳﻘﻮ ﻪ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﻮﺍ ﻦ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺍ ﺼﺺ ،ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻨﺎ.
104
2ـ ﻳﻨﺎﻗﺶ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺑ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﻚ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﻟﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ
ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻧﱠﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩ ،ﻓ ﺮﺝ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻞ
ﻧﺰﺍﻋﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺒﻌﺎ ﺇﻥ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠـﻢ ،ﺍﺳـﺘﺪﻟﻮﺍ ﺑـﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺟﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄ :
ﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺼﺐ ﺍﳊ :ﻗﺪ ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪ ـ ﺃ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺘﻬﺪ ﻣﺼﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،ﻌ ﺳﻘﻮ ﺍﻹ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﷲ Υﺷﺮ
ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻴﺪ ﺑﺘﺒﲔ ﺍ ﺪ ،ﻭﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻴﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﲔ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺍ ﺄ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﺭ ﻣـﻊ ﺍﻟﻨـﺼﻮ
ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻏﲑ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﺩﻭﻥ ﺗﻔﺮﻳ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻘﻠﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺘﻬﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻧـﺪ،
ﻭﺇﻻ ﻟﺰﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺈﺳﻼﻡ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎ ﻞ 1،ﻭﻻ ﻔﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎ ﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﺍ ﻠﺰﻭﻡ.
ﺏ ـ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ﻟﺘﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ" :ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺩﺍﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻜـﻦ
ﺗﺼ ﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﺮ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺷﺮ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻴﺪ ﺑﺘﺒﻴﲔ
2
ﺍ ﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍ ﺪ ﻣﻌﺘ ﺍ ﰲ ﺻ ﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻣﻌ ".
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻞ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺼ ﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻧِﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﱠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﱠﻳﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ؛ ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍ ﻘﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ،
ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻮﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﰲ ﺍ ﺸﺮﺏ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ؛ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻨﺎ " :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺑﻘﻴ ﰲ
ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍ ﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ" 3،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ" :ﺃﺳـﺮﻓ ﺎﺋﻔـﺔ ﻓﻜﻔـﺮﻭﺍ ﻋـﻮﺍﻡ
ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻭﺯﻋﻤﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺣ ﱠﺮﺭﻭﻫﺎ ﻓﻬـﻮ ﻛـﺎﻓﺮ!،
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،349 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ ،326 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ :ﺮﻳ ﺍ ﺠـﺮﺗﲔ،
،337ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ :ﻣﻔﺎﺗﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺐ ) ،(44/6ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺑﻄﲔ :ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﲔ ).(515/4
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ :ﻣﻔﺎﺗﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺐ ).(45/6
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ).(349/13
105
ﺼﺔ ﺑﺸﺮﺫﻣﺔ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ـﺘﻜﻠﻤﲔ" 1،ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﻓﻀﻴﻘﻮﺍ ﺭ ﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺳﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﳉﱠﻨﺔ ﺘ ﱠ
2
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺃ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ.
ﻜﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪ ﻓﻮﻗﻊ ﰲ ﻣﻜﻔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳋﻔﻴﺔ :ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﱠـﺔ: ـ ﺝ
"ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ؛ ﻓﺎﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﱠﻣﺔ ﻤﺪ εﻭﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﳊ ﻓﺄﺧﻄﺄ ،ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺑـﻞ
ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺧﻄﺄﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﱠﻴﻦ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ،ﻓﺸﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻟﻪ ﺍ ـﺪ
3
ﻭﺍﱠﺗﺒﻊ ﻏﲑ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻣﻨﲔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ." ...
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺟﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ،ﻟﻮ ﺍﻟﺘُﺰﻣ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺸﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺑﲔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍ ـﺴﻠﻤﲔ،
ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺎ ،ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺃﻣﱠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ εﺍﻟ ﻣ ﱠﺮ .
ﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﻠ ﻪ ﺍﳊ ﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻴﺚ ﺍﻟ ﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺏ: ـ ﺩ
ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﻠﻐﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ،ﻭﺑﻘـﻲ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻬـﺎ ﺇﱃ
4
ﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳊ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭ ﻏﲑ ﻣ ﺍﺧﺬ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳُﺘﻮﻫﱠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻋﲔ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨﻔﻜـﺔ ﻋﻨـﻬﺎ ـﺎﻡ
ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻜﺎﻙ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣُﺮﺍﺩﻧﺎ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻓﺠﺎﺭﱠﻳﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ ـﺎﻫﺮ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻪ ﺍ ﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍ ﺧﺮﺓ ﻓﻘـﺪ
5
ﻳﻌﺬﺭﻩ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻧﻊ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﻴُﻦ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺮﺓ.
ﻭ ﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻣﻌﺘﺼﻢ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
3ـ ﺍﻋﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺪﻳ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻋ ﱠﺪﺓ ﺃﻭﺟﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻲ:
ﺃ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍ ﺣﺎﺩ ﺍﻟ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﺜﺒ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺮﻳﻘـﻪ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ؛ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻟﺰﺍﻡ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄ ﺑـﺈﺫﻥ
ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ 6،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻟﻨﺎ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ) ،(349/13ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃ ﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻪُ ﰲ ﺩﺣﺾ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻴﺔ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(320/8
3ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ :ﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭ ).(180/12
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺭﺷﻴﺪ ﺭﺿﺎ :ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍ ﻨﺎﺭ ).(410/5
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ :ﺮﻳ ﺍ ﺠﺮﺗﲔ.339 ،
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(527/2
106
ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒـﻞ ﺏ ـ ﻧﺴﻠﻢ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻭﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ؛ ﻟﻜﱠﻨﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻮﺭ
1
ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ؛ ﻓﻠﻴ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺄﻭﱃ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ .ψ
ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺮﻳ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ؛ ﺝ ـ ﻧﺴﻠﻢ ﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺃ ﺃﻭ
ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﻗﻴ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨ ،εﻓ ﺮﺝ ﺬﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻞ ﻧﺰﺍﻋﻨﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭُﻭﻱ ﺑﻠﻔ " :ﻰ ﺭﺳـﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ
εﻋﻦ ﻧﺒﻴﺬ ﺍﳉﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﻀﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﺑﻴﺾ " 2،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ..." :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻔﻮ ﺎ ﻓﻔـﻲ ﺍﻷ ﱠﻭﻝ
3
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ".
ﻭ ﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳُﺠﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﻋﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻌ ،
ﻭﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺾ ﻣُﺪﺭﺟﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻟﻜ ﱠﻦ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻬـﻲ ﻋﻨـﺪﻩ ﻫـﻮ ﺩ ــ ﻧﺴﻠﻢ ﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻹﺳﻜﺎﺭ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻠﻮﻥ؛ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﺮﺍﺭ ﺗﺴﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﲑ ﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﺘﻐﱠﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﻌﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﻨﻬﻮﺍ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﻹﺫﻥ ﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺒﺎﺫ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭﻋﻴﺔ ،ﺑﺸﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺸﺮﺑﻮﺍ ﻣﺴﻜﺮﺍ ،ﻭﻳ ﻳﺪ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺸﺮﺏ ﻧﺒﻴﺬ ﺍﳉﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﻀﺮ ،ﻭﺻ ﱠﺢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑـﻦ ﻣـﺴﻌﻮﺩ
4
ﻭ ﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﺬ ﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﻀﺮ.
107
ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟُﻪ ﺑﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺃﻭ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺇﻥ ﺭﺍﻡ ﺇﻟﺰﺍﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ
ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ،ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺘﲔ؛ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺻ ﺑﺎ ﻀﺮﺓ ﻻ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻟﻪ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺷﺎﺋﻌﺎ ﰲ
ﺟﺮﺍﺭﻫﻢ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ،ﻻ ﻟﻼﺣﺘﺮﺍﺯ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳ ﺍﻝ ،ﻓﻜﺄﱠﻧﻪ ﺳ ﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻻ ﺗﻨﺒﺬﻭﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ،
1
ﻓﻨﻘﻠﻪ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮﺍﻭﻱ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﻀﺮ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟ .
ﻭﻛﻼ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻬﲔ ﻨﻌﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮﻩ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻼ
ﻣﺘﻤﺴﻚ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ .
4ـ ﻳﻨﺎﻗﺶ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺪﻳ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋ ﱠﺪﺓ ﺃﻭﺟﻪ:
108
ﺍ ﺣﺎﺩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﻜﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺃ ـ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇ ﺒﺎ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺎﻟﻔﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻟﻨﺎ.
ﺏ ـ ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﻋُﺮﻭﺓ ﻟ ﺑﺎﺣﺔ ﺑﺎﻗﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻹ ﻭﺍﳉﻨﺎ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻹ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ
ﺍ ﺒﺎ ،ﻭ ﻞ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺳﺎﻛﺘﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ ﻭﻋﺪﻣﻪ ،ﻣﺼﺮﺣﺔ ﺑﺮﻓﻊ ﺍﻹ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍ ﺒﺎ ﻓﻴ ﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻹ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻙ.
ﺴﺎﺋﻠﲔ؛ ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ ﻓﻴﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻻ ﺘﻨﻊ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ،ﻣﻊ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎ ﺇﻳﻘﺎﻋﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺼﻮﺻﺔ ،ﻭﻻ
1
ﻳﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻹ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻹ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻙ،
ﻭﺃﻧ ﺧﺒﲑ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻭﺭﻭﺩﻩ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳ ﺍﻝ.
ﺝ ـ ﻧﺴﻠﻢ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻔﻬﻢ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻨﻄـﻮ
ﻭﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ،ﻭ ﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺄﺧﺬﻩ؛ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻨـﺰﻭﻝ؛ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺩﻝ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭ ﺗﺄ ﻤﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻲ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﻭ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻠﻴﺔ 2،ﻻ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﻻ ﲢﺘ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ﺎ ،ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺩ ـ ﺇﻥ ﺻﺢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻓﻼ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ،
ﻣﻌﺎﺭﺿﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﻓﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨ .ε
ﺎ ﺻ ﱠﺢ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄ ﰲ ﻣـﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻧـﺴ ﺫ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺎﻟ
ﺇﳚﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻏﺘﺴﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﻓﻘ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻮﺫﺍ ﺃﺻﻼ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﻔـﻬﻮﻡ
ﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺻ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ 3،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺸﻐ ُ
ﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴ ،ﻭﺣ ﻭﺇﻥ ُﻳﺴﻠﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺩﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﺻﻞ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺭﺩ ﺩﻋﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻔﻬﻢ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ.
5ـ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺪﻳ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺣﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻹ ﻨﲔ ،ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻟﻨﺎ
ﻻ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ؛ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺘﻘﺮﺭﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺩﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻼﻓﻪ ﺎ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(47/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ).(499/3
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮ ﻲ :ﺍﻹﺗﻘﺎﻥ ) ،(86/1ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺔ :ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨـﺰﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ 30 ،ﻭ.35
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻮﺫﺍ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ).(207/2
109
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﺴ ﺍ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﺰ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﲢﻜﻢ ﻻ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻗﺪ ﻳﺴﻮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ُﻳﻌﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺄﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﻬﻤ ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺗﺰﻋﻤﻬﺎ؛ ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﻟﻠ ﱠﻦ ﻻ ﻟﻠﻘﻄﻊ ،ﻭﻣﻦ
ﻓﺎﻻﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻡ ﻠﺒﺎ ﻟ ﻭﺿﺢ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺎﻓﻴﻪ.
6ـ ﻧﻮﻗﺶ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﱠﺓ ﺃﻭﺟﻪ:
ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮ؛ 1ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻴﻪ ﺃ ـ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻻ ﻓﺮ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍ
ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻲ ﺗﺸﻤ ﺰ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﻀﻼﺀ ،ﻻ ﻟﻮﺻﻔﻨﺎ ﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﺑﻞ ﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻹﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﻠﺐ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺭ ﱠﳑﺎ ﻻ ﺘﻠ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻭﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ
ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻩ 2،ﻭﻻ ﺇﺧﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺎﻟ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺎﻓﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻼﺯﻣﺔ؛ ﻭﺑ ﱠﺮﺭﻭﺍ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻘﺪ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ
3
ﻳﻮﻣ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ،ﺃﻭ ﺩﻓﻌﺎ ﻟﺘﻮﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﱠﳑﻦ ﺘ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺭﺍﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺇﻣﻜﺎ ﺎ ـ ﺇﻥ ﺩﻟ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺋﻦ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ـ ﻻ
ﻳﻀﲑﻧﺎ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻻ ﻨﻴﺘﻪ 4،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻬﻤﻬﻢ
ﺎﻫﺮ. ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺍ
ﺏ ـ ﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍ ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﺴﻠﻤﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ
5
ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﳑﺘﻨﻊ.
ﺝ ـ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺻ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻔﺮ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻚ :ﺭﺃﻳ ﳊﻤﺎ ﺮﻳﺎ،
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺇﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﺗﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﺗﻚ ﺎ ﻟﻴ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(286/3ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(57/2ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺘﺎﺯﺍ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺘﺎﺯﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷـﺮ
ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻬﻰ ) ،(179/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(1085/3
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(57/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(287/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(1079/3
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻹﳚﻲ :ﺷﺮ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻬﻰ ) ،(177/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(1079/3
4ـ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺘﺎﺯﺍ " :ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻹﻧﺸﺎﺀ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻨﺎ :ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺃﺋﻤـﺔ ﻓـﻀﻼﺀ
ﻭﻣﻄﻞ ﺍﻟﻐ ﻠﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻧﻔﻲ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻌﻮﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺋﻦ؛ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻨـﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟـﺸﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ"؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮ ﺘﺼﺮ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻬﻰ ).(179/2
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) (64/2ﻭ) ،(159/3ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(361/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ )،(287/3
ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺷﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻞ ،600 ،ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(58/2ﺍﻟﻼﻣﺸﻲ :ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ.46 ،
110
ﻗﻠ ﻟﻮﻟﺪﻙ :ﺍﺷﺘﺮ ﱄ ﳊﻤﺎ ﺮﻳﺎ ،ﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﻤﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻱ ﻳﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻮ ،ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ
1
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻔﻲ ﻣﻼﺯﻣﺎ ﻟ ﺒﺎ .
ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻏﲑ ﺩ ـ ﺃﻥ ﺍ
ﰲ ﺍ ﺎﺭﺝ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﺎﺭﺝ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻟﻠﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻻ ﻟﻠ ،ﻼ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ؛ ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻟﻪ
ﺣ ﳚﺮﻱ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ
ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺃﻭﺟﺒ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻔـﻰ ﻭﺟـﻮﺏ
2
ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﺻ ﻴﺢ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺧ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺪﻭﻡ ﺯﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻴـﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻏﺮ ﺫ ـ ﺃﻥ ﺍ
ﻋﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻞ ،ﻼ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﻓﻐﺮﺿﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻠ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺑﺰﻛـﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻐـﻨﻢ
3
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﺔ ﰲ ﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﻟﺘﻌﻠ ﻄﻠ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ.
6ـ ﻧﻮﻗﺶ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﺇﻟﺰﺍﻣﻪ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻳُﻠ ِﺰ ُﻣﻬُﻢ
ﺮﺩﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻘﺐ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃ ﻌﻨﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﺑﺄﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ـﺘ
ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻘﺐ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻀﲑﻩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﺯﻡ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻓﲑﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﻮﻧﺎ ﺷﺎﺳﻌﺎ ﺑﻴﻨـﻬﻤﺎ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮ ﻦ ﻓﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺗـﺼ ﻴﺢ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺑﺪﻭﻧﻪ ﺘﻞ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺼﺪ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻳﻔﺪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻻ
ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ 4،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺭﻣﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ... " :ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻟﻴ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻨﻨﺘﻢ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺑﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷ ﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﻟﻠﻤﺴ ﱠﻤﻰ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺃﻟﻘﺎﺑﺎ
ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺍ ﱠﺩﻋﻴﺘﻢ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺍ ﺸﺘ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻴﻪ ﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻩ،
111
ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺘﺎﺝ ﻣ ﱠﺪﻋﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﻗﻴ ،ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣـ ﱠﺪﻋﻲ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳـﻢ
1
ﺍ ﺸﺘ ".
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﱠﻧﱠﻨﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻮﻗﻴ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻨـﺎ ﻣﻨـﻪ
ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﻭ ﺍﳉﻠﱠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺃ ﻌﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻠﺼﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻣﻠﺠﺄ
ﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ؛ ﻟﻮﺿﻮﺣﻪ ﻭﺿﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﻤ ﰲ ﻛﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺀ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ،ﺗﺒﻴﱠﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺿﻌ ﺍﺳـﺘﺪﻻﻻ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﺇﻣﱠﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻞ ﺍﻟﻨـﺰﺍ ،ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑ ﺳﺎ ﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻌﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﱠﺍﺟﺢ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻬﺮ
ﺑﻮﺿﻮ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻘ ﱠﻮﺓ ﺃﺩﻟﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﻨﻮﻋﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳـﺘﻘﺎﻡ ـﻢ
ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻼ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻚ ،ﺃﺭﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ε؛ ﻳﻠﻴﻬـﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ψﻭﻫﻮ ﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻹ ﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﻮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺇﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ
ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻜﺜﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻋﻤﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻳﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺃﺋ ﱠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ.
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺒ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﺒ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺃﻭﱃ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﺎ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺩﺭﺟـﺔ،
2
ﻭﺃﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺭﺗﺒﺔ.
112
1ـ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ﻓﻬﻤﻮﺍ ﻧﺴ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :εﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺀ " 1،ﻔﻬـﻮﻡ ﺣـﺪﻳ " :ﺇﺫﺍ
2
ﺟﻠ ﺑﲔ ﺷﻌﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ،ﻭﻣ ﱠ ﺍ ﺘﺎﻥ ﺍ ﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻐﺴﻞ".
3
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇ ﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺠﱠﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
2ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻟﻮﺍ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﱠﻴﺔ 4ﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ " :τﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﺼﺮ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻣﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ
ﻔﺘﻢ ﺃ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺟﻨﺎ ﺃ ﺗﻘﺼﺮﻭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺇ ﻓﻠﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ] :ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺿﺮﺑﺘﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟ ﺭ
ﻳﻔﺘﻨﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻔﺮﻭﺍ 5،[ ...ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮ :ﻓﺴﺄﻟ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ εﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﺗﺼ ﱠﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺎ
6
ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻓﺎﻗﺒﻠﻮﺍ ﺻﺪﻗﺘﻪ".
ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﺎ ﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻄ ﻭﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﻟﻘـﺼﺮ
ﺑﺎ ﻮ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺟﻮﺍﺯﻩ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﻦ ،ﻓﺄﻗ ﱠﺮﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻨ εﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺜﺒ ﻟﻨـﺎ ﺑـﺬﻟﻚ
7
ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻹﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻹ ﺎ .
3ــ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ" :ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺎﺣﺘ ﱠ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺼﺮ ﻗﻮ ﻢ؛ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺻﻔﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺄﱠﻧﻪ ﺷﺮ ﺃﻥ
8
ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺻ ﱠﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ".
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ
ﺸﺮ ،ﻭﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﺍ ﻘﻘﻮﻥ ﻣـﻦ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺇﻟـﻰ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﻴﺾ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،343ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬـﺎﺭﺓ ،ﺑـﺎﺏ ﰲ
ﺍﻹﻛﺴﺎﻝ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،217ﻛﻼ ﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺃ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍ ﺪﺭﻱ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻷ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ.
2ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺴﻞ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻰ ﺍ ﺘﺎﻧﺎﻥ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 291ﻋﻦ ﺃ ﻫﺮﻳﺮﺓ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘـﺎﺏ
ﺍﳊﻴﺾ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻧﺴ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،349ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﺴﻠﻢ.
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ ،220 ،ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ) ،(462/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿـﺢ ) ،(270/3ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(1083/3
4ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺻﻔﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﻦ ﺃ ﻋﺒﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﳊﻨ ﻠﻲ ،ﺷﻬﺪ ﺣﻨﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋ ﻭﺗﺒﻮﻙ ،ﻭﻗﺘﻞ τﰲ ﺻﻔﲔ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟ :ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ ) ،(285/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻷ ﲑ :ﺃﺳﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺑﺔ ) ،(543/5ﺭﻗﻢ .5640
5ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ.101 :
6ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﻗﺼﺮﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺼﺮﻫﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .686
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ 219 ،ﻭﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ ) 429/1ﻭ ،(432ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌـﺪﺓ ) ،(460/2ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) 271/3ﻭ ،(277ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻮﺫﺍ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ) ،(191/2ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎ :ﻗﻮﺍ ﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ).(255/1
8ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(529/2
113
ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﻭﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ 1،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺎ ﻳﺄ :
1ــ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ " :ﻭﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺄﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺘﻨﻊ ﺒﻮ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑـﺸﺮ ﲔ
ﺘﻠﻔﲔ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺯﻳﺪ ﻓﺄﻛﺮﻣﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻋﻄـﺎﻙ ﺩﺭ ـﺎ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﻟﻘﻴﻚ ﺭﺍﻛﺒﺎ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺸﺮﻭ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﺣﺪﻫﺎ ،ﻛﻮﻧـﻪ
2
ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﻮ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ".
ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻘﺾ؛ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍ ﺸﺮﻭ ،ﻭﺳﻨﺪ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍ ﺪﱠﻋﻰ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻢ
3
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻥ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺪﻝ.
2ـ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ" :ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﺀﻙ ﻓﺄﻋﻄﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺎ،
ﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﺎﺋﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﺄ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺈﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻨﻊ ،ﻓﻬـﻮ ﻨــﺰﻟﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻧ ﱠ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺃﻋ ﺍﳉﺎﺋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺩﻟﻠﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻋ ﺍﳉﺎﺋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺎ ،ﻓـﺈﻥ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﻻ
4
ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻴ ﺎﺀ ،ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﺀﻙ ﻓﺄﻋﻄﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺎ".
ﻓﺄﻧ ﺗﻠ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺃ ﱠﻭﻝ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﺍﻧﻄﻠ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺻ ﻴ ﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻟﻴﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ .
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴﺢ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻ ﻢ ﺪﻳ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﲔ ،ﻭ ﺎ: 1ـ ﺍﻋﺘﺮ
ﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺃ ـ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍ ﺣﺎﺩ ﺍﻟ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﺜﺒ
5
ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ".
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(528/2ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(342/3ﺍﻟﺒ ـﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛـﺸ ﺍﻷﺳـﺮﺍﺭ
) ،(397/2ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،271 ،ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ).(62/2
2ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(528/2ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ.271 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻥ :ﻧﺰﻫﺔ ﺍ ﺎ ﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎ ﺮ ) ،(221/2ﻫﺎﻣﺶ .1
4ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(528/2
5ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(527/2ﻭﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ).(346/3
114
ﻭﻧﻮﻗﺶ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻼ ﺔ ﺃﻭﺟﻪ؛ ﺃﻭ ﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺧ ﺣﺎﺩ ﳚﺮﻱ ﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮ؛ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻷ ﱠﻣﺔ ﺗﻠﻘﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭ ﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄـﺎﺏ ﻣـﻦ ﻣـﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟ ﻳﺴﻮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ،ﻓﻴﺘﺮﻛﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺇ ﺒﺎﺗﻪ ﺍ ﺣﺎﺩ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﺍ ﱠﺮﺟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪ ﻭﻗﺼﺎ ﻭ ﻮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﺩ ،ﺟﺎﺯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ
1
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻄ ﻱ.
ﻭﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﻪ ـ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ـ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ؛ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺧ ﺍ ﺣﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺗﻠﻘﺘﻪ ﺍﻷ ﱠﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻘﻘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟـﺸﺄﻥ،
ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﲢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺀﺓ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳ ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴ ﲔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷ ﱠﻣﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻠﻘﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ
2
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ؛ ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﺻ ﱠﺮ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ.
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺒ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﺈﻧﱠﻪ ُﻳﺴﺘﻬﺠﻦ ﺗﻠﻘ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍ ﺘﻌﺴ ﰲ ﺭﺩ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻋـﻦ
ﺻﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺣﺎﺩ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻠﻘﺘﻪ ﺍﻷ ﱠﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ 3،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ؛ ﺧﺎ ﱠ
ﺃﻭﻗﻌﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻭﺍﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏ ،ﻓﺄﻟﻔﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺘ ﺑﻨﻔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻭ ﺎ ﺗﻀﻤﱠﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺇ ﺎ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﻳﻨﺘﺼﺮ ﻟﻠﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨ εﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﻤﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟـﻮﺏ ،ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ:
"ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻹ ﺎ ،ﺭﺟﻮﻋﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ τﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ
4
ﺍﻟﻐﺴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍ ﺘﺎﻧﲔ ."...
ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻋﺰ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮ ﻦ ﺑﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﺔ ،ﻭ ﱠﳑﺎ ﻳ ﻛﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺃ ﺒ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ
ﺪﻳ ﻣﻌﺎﺫ ﻭﰲ ﺳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﻝ 5،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍ ﺣـﺎﺩ ﺍﻟـ ﻻ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ ) (435 - 434/1ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ ،222 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ).(284/3
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼ :ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ 85 ،ﻭﺍ ﻘﺪﻣﺔ ،18 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ :ﺍ ﻤﻮ ) ،(188/13ﺍﺑﻦ
ﻛﺜﲑ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻋ ﺍﳊﺜﻴ ،28 ،ﺍﳊﻠ :ﺍﻟﻨﻜ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺰﻫﺔ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ،73 ،ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮ ﻲ :ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭﻱ،104 ،
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻗﻲ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎ ،43 ،ﺍﻟﺴ ﺎﻭﻱ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍ ﻐﻴ ) ، (51/1ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.94 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(336/1
4ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(318/1
5ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻗﻀﻴﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،3592ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺣﻜـﺎﻡ،
ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻛﻴ ﻳﻘﻀﻲ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1327ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺪﻳ ﻻ ﻧﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴ ﺇﺳـﻨﺎﺩﻩ
ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺘﺼﻞ.
115
ﺗﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻓﻜﻴ ﺘ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺣﺎﺩ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻨﻘﻄﻌﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻬﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻧﱠﻪ ﺧ ﺗﻠﻘﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﱠﺔ ﺑـﺎﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ...ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻤـ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻭﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﱠﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻭ ﻬﺮ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﺸﺮ ،ﺃﻏ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺇﺳـﻨﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻭ ﻳﻘـﺪ ﰲ
ﺻ ﺘﻪ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ﻟﻪ" 1،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ـﺬﺍ ﺍﳊـﺪﻳ
ﺍ ﱠﺮﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴ ﲔ.
ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﻩ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﺄ ﺮ " :ﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ εﺣﱠﺘﻰ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻭﻗﺮﺃ
" 2،ﻭﻋﻠ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ" :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺗﻪ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﲑ ،ﻭ ﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻭﻭﺍ ﻣـﺎ ﻻ ﻳـﺴﺘ ﻠﻮﻥ
3
ﺍﻟﻨﻄ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ،ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺎ ﺎﻫﺮﺍ ".
ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻣﻌﺘﺼﻢ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍ ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﺃ ﱠﻭﻝ ﺍ ﻌﺮﺿﲔ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎ.
ﺏ ـ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ" :ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺧﻼ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﻝ ﻋﻦ ـﺎﻫﺮ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻣﺎﺀ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﻮ ﺒ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ
ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻧﺴ ﺎ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻳﺒﲔ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺃﻧﱠـﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺭﺩ
ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ُﻳﻘﻞ ﺇﱠﻧﻪ ﻧﺴ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ
ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﺍ ﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ] :ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﺘﻠﻮﺍ ﺃﻭﻻﺩﻛﻢ ﺸﻴﺔ ﺇﻣﻼ 4،[ ...ﻻ ﳚـﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺴﻮ ﺑﺈ ﺎ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺘﻠﻬﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﻼ ،ﻓﺒﻄﻞ ﻣﺎ
ﺗﻌﻠﻘﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻗﺘﻞ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﻤﺮﺍ ،ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻧـﺴ
5
ﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﺯﻳﺪ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺯﻳﺪ".
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍ ﻋ ﱠﺪﺓ ﻣ ﺧﺬ:
116
ﺃﻭ ﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻋﻤﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ψﻓﻬﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻭ ﻳﻔﻬﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺴ ،ﲢﻜﻢ ﺾ ﻻ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﻀﺔ ﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺎ ﺻ ﱠﺮﺣﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃ ﺑﻦ ﻛﻌـﺐ :τ
1
"ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﺭﺧﺼﺔ ﰲ ﺃ ﱠﻭﻝ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ".
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﻬﻞ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ " :τ 2ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﺇﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺭﺧﺼﺔ
3
ﰲ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺴﻞ ﺑﻌﺪ".
ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﺃﺭﺍﺩﻭﺍ ﻧﺴ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺧﻄﺎﺑﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻄ ﻟﻴ ﻨﺴﻮ ﺑﺈ ـﺎ 4،ﻭﻟﻌـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻟﻘ ﱠﻮﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ﺗﺮ ﱠﺩﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘـﺎ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻧﻔ ﺍ ﻌ ..." :ﻭﻋﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻴﻪ ﻣﻨـﺴﻮ ﺃﻭ
5
ﺼﻮ ".
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻨـﺰﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺑﺪﻋﻮ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ 6،ﻓﺎﳉﻮﺍﺏ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻓﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﻟـﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ
7
ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻳﻌﺪﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺀﻩ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺃﻟﺰﻡ ﺎﻟﻔﻴﻪ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍﺀ ،ﺭﻛﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘـﻮﻝ ﺑـﺄﱠﻧﻬﻢ
ﻧﺴ ﻮﺍ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻗﺘﻠﻬﻢ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺃﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﻼ ﺑﺎﻹ ﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻞ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﻓﻬﻤﻮﺍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﻭﻟﻮﻳﺔ ﻣﻨﻊ
ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻣ ﱠﺮ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ،ﻭﺳﻘﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﻮﺍ ﻦ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻛﺴﺎﻝ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،214ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ
ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 110ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺻ ﻴﺢ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺴﻞ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .609
2ـ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺱ ﺳﻬﻞ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺍ ﺰﺭﺟﻲ ،ﻣﻦ ﺻﻐﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ،ﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ 88ﻫـ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟ :ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ ) ،(49/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻷ ﲑ :ﺃﺳﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺑﺔ ) ،(547/2ﺭﻗﻢ .2294
3ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍ ﰲ ﺍ ﺼﻨ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،951ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺷﻴﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﺼﻨ ) ،(89/1ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑـﻦ ﺣﺠـﺮ..." :ﻭﰲ
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺇﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻷﻥ ﺘ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴ " ،ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ).(397/1
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ :ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ ) ،(462/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(277/3ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻮﺫﺍ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ).(210/2
5ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(401/1
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ).(347/3
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺼﺮﺓ 221 ،ﻭ ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻊ ) ،(433/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ).(271/3
117
ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﺘﻐﺮ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ...] :Υﻭﺃﻭﺗﻴ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ 1،[...ﻭﻣﻊ
2
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﺮﺟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ!.
2ـ ﺍﻋﺘﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻬﻢ ﺪﻳ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﺑﻦ ﺃﻣﱠﻴﺔ ﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎ ﻫﻲ:
ﺃ ـ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ" :ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻏﻠ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﻓﻬﻤﻮﺍ ﺗﻘﺼﲑ ﺍﻟـﺼﻼﺓ
ﻟﻠ ﺎﺋ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻓﺮ ،ﻭﺑﻘﻲ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻓﺮ ﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﻮﻩ ،ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻄﻠﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ
3
ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺺ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺪﻣﻮﻩ ﺃﳊﻘﻮﻩ ﺑﺄﺷﺒﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﲔ ﺑﻪ."....
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﰲ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺸﻜﻠﻮﺍ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻦ ﻣـﻦ ﺟﻬـﺔ
ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﺍﳊﻴﺪﺓ ﺇﺫﻥ !.
ﺏ ـ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺑﻠﻔ ﻋﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺣ ﻛﻞ
ﺃﺣﺪ ،ﻓ ﺮﺝ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻓﺮ ﺍ ﺎﺋ ﺑﺎﻟﱠﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻌﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ τﻭﻳﻌﻠﻰ ،ﻓﻄﻠﺒـﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻤـﻼ
ﺍ ﺴﺎﻓﺮ ﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺮﻳ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ
4
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ".
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﲢﻜﻢ ﺾ ﻻ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻷ ﺮ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺸﻜﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺷﺮ ﺍ ﻮ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻤﻞ ،ﳊﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﻧﻘﻠ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺣﻮﺍﺩ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻠﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺼﻴﺼﻪ.
ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﻓﻬﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟ ُﻌﻤُﻮﻣﺎ ﺍ ﻣﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻹ ﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺃﻧ ﺧﺒﻴـﺮ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘـﻮﻝ ﺑـﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮﻩ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹ ﺎﻡ،
ﻭﻋﻤﺮ τﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻘ ﱠ
ﺼﺔ ﱠﳑﻦ ﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮ ..." :τﻭﺍﻟـﺴﻔ ِﺮ
118
ﺎﻟﻔـﺔ ﺭﻛﻌﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺎﻡ ﻏﲑ ﻗﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﻤﺪ 1،"εﻓﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺠﺒﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ
2
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
3
ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻤﻞ ﺧﻼ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻓﻼ ﻧﻌﺮﺝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺃﻧﱠﻰ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﻪ.
ﺝ ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺟﻼ ﺳﺄﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮ ﻦ ،ﺇﱠﻧﺎ ﺪ
ﺴﻔﺮ ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ :ﻳـﺎ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍ ﻮ ﻭﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﳊﻀﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ،ﻭﻻ ﺪ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
4
ﺃﺧﻲ ﺇﻥ ﺍﷲ Υﺑﻌ ﺇﻟﻴﻨﺎ ﱠﻤﺪﺍ εﻭﻻ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻧﻔﻌﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎﻩ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ".
ﻋﻠ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷ ﺮ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺼﺮﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ ﻣﻨﲔ ﱠﳑﺎ ﺍﺋﺘﺴﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨ ،εﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ،ﻓﺜﺒ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﻓﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨ 5،" εﻓﻬﻮ
ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﻳﻌﺘ ﻭﺍ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺭﺟﻌﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨ .ε
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻞ ﺍﻟﻨـﺰﺍ ؛ ﻓﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﻻ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ 6،ﻭ ﻞ ﺍ ﻼ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﺸﻜﺎﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ.
3ــ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗﻔﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺎﻟﻔﻴﻪ ،ﻣـﻦ
ﺃﻗ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺮﺃ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻮ ﻢ ﳚﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻱ ﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺬﻭﺭ ﺑﻄﻼﻧﻪ؛ ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﻮﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﺿ ﺎ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻟﺰﻭﻣﻪ ﺸﺮﻭ ﻪ ،ﻛﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﻟﻠﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻱ
ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﻮﻱ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻧﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ .
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﻘﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 1440ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻮﺍ ﻭﺍﻟـﺴﻨﺔ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1064ﻭﺻ ﻪ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎ .
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻮﺫﺍ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ) ،(192/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ ،237 ،ﺍﺑـﻦ ﻣﻔﻠـﺢ :ﺃﺻـﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘـﻪ
).(1081/3
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ :ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(1081/3
4ـ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻪ:ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ ،ﺭﻗﻢ،7 :ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﻘﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ
،1463ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﻪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻮﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1065ﻭﺻ ﻪ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎ .
5ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(248/2
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ) ،(282/3ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻮﺫﺍ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ) ،(192/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺎﺩﻳ :ﻣﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ.31 ،
119
ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻱ ﻳﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭ ﰲ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻠﻔﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺧﺮ؛ ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﻴﻠـﺰﻡ ﻣـﻦ
1
ﻋﺪﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍ ﺸﺮﻭ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﻻ ﻋﺪﻡ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﻞ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﻄﺄ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ
ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻮﻩ ﺻ ﻴ ﺎ ،ﻻﺳﺘ ﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﺘﺮ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪ ﺻـﻔﺎ ﻛـﺜﲑﺓ،
ﻻﺳﺘ ﺎﻟﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺘﺮ ﰲ ﺒﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻻﻣﺮﺃﺗﻪ :ﺇﻥ ﺩﺧﻠ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ ﻓﺄﻧ ﺎﻟ ،ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺷـﺮ ﺎ ﰲ
2
ﻭﻗﻮ ﺍﻟﻄﻼ ،ﻻ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﻼ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ".
ﻭﻻ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟـﺬﻱ
ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍ ﺸﺮﻭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﲢﻘ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﻣـﻦ ﻟـ ﱠ ﻟﻔـﻪ ﻓـﺈﻥ
ﺍﺳﺘﺼ ﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ؛ 3ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔـﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﻄﻼ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ
1ـ ﺃﺟﻴﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺩﻻﻟﺘـﻪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺍ ﺸﺮﻭ ،ﺑﺄﻥ ﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭُﺗﺐ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﻔـﺮﺩﺍ،
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺩﻝ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺷﺮ ﺧﺮ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻧﺎ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺭُﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻴﻌﺎ ﻳﻨﺘـ
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻝ ،ﺣـﺼﻞ ﺑﻮﺟـﻮﺩ
.43 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ) ،(72/2) (107/1ﺍﻟﺸﺎ :ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎ ) ،(197/1ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﺍ ﺬﻛﺮﺓ،
2ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(529/2
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،271 ،ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(221/2ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛﺸ ﺍﻷﺳـﺮﺍﺭ
) ،(397/2ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺘﺎﺯﺍ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻮﻳﺢ ) ،(146/1ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ـﺮ ﺍ ـﻴ ) ،(168/5ﺍﻟـﺴﺒﻜﻲ :ﺍﻹ ـﺎﺝ
) ،(379/1ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎ :ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻞ.249 ،
120
ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺒﻮ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻗﻀﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺍﻟـﺸﺮ ،
1
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺪﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻗﻀﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺷﺮ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.
ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺩﻋﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ،ﻓﻐﲑ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ؛ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﻻ ﻋﺪﻡ ،ﻼ ﺍﻟـﺸﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺍﻟﻨ ﻮﻱ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺩﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺍ ﻼ ﰲ ﺮﻳﻘﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃ ﻌﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ.
2ـ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻠﻪ ﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ :
ﺃ ـ ﻧﺴﻠﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ،
2
ﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎ ﱠﻣﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ، ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻓ ﱠ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺳﻔﺮﻧﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺭﺟ ﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﻠﺒﺎ ﻟﻠﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ.
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﺴﻦ ﺇﻏﻔﺎﻝ ﺿﻤﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻬ ﱠﻤﺔ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺟﻮﻋﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻟﻴ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇ ﻼﻗـﻪ؛
ﺾ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌـﺪﻡ،
ُ ﻷﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻷﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ،ﻳﺄ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺳﻬﺎ
ﻼ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺠﻮﱠﺯ.
ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻓﲑﻓـﺾ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﺏ ــ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺣﺘ
ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮﻳﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ.
ﺝ ـ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺄ ﱠﻣﻠ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﺃﻟﻔﻴ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺭﻗﻌﻪ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻴ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﺑﻠﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺍ ـﺸﺘ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻊ ﺑُﻌ ِﺪ ِﻩ ﳑﺘﻨﻊ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍ ﻮﺍﺯﻧﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﻼﺀ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬـﻮﺭ،
ﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻟﻮﺍ ﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺻ ﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ρﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻓﻬـﻢ
ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ψﻭﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎﺱ ﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻭﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ
ﺗﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻌﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻧﻔﺎﺓ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺘﺠﻮﻥ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ .
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻱ :ﺍ ﻌﺘﻤﺪ ) ،(142/1ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻮﺫﺍ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ) ،(189/2ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟـﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(99/1ﺍ ﻣـﺪﻱ:
ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(408/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻥ :ﻧﺰﻫﺔ ﺍ ﺎ ﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎ ﺮ ) ،(221/2ﻫﺎﻣﺶ.1:
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛﺸ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺍﺭ ) 380/2ﻭ ،(398ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﻧﻔﺎﺋ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) ،(1402/3ﺷﻠ :ﺃﺻـﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ.500 ،
121
ﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ:
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ
1
ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻭﺍﻓﻘﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﻨﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ،
ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﺮ ﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻘﺾ ﻓﺴﺄﻗﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻐﻴﺎﻩ ﰲ
ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﺎ ﻳﺄ :
1ــ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻔﻮﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣـﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﱠﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﻘـﻮﻥ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻗﻮﻟـﻪ ...]:Υﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﺮﺑـﻮﻫﻦ ﺘـ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻼ
ﻳﻄﻬﺮ 2،[...ﻛﻼﻡ ﻏﲑ ﺗﺎﻡ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻭﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺑ ﱠﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺿﻤﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻀﻤﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍ ﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺍ ﺘﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ] :ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﺮﺑﻮﻫﻦ[ ،ﻓﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﻭﺍ ﺘﻀ ﱠﻤﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ:
ﺣ ﻳﻄﻬﺮﻥ ﻓﺎﻗﺮﺑﻮﻫ ﱠﻦ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻳﻘ ﱠﺪﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺿﻤﺎﺭ ،ﻟﺼﺎﺭ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻘﺮﺑﻮﻫ ﱠﻦ ﻟﻐﻮﺍ ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ
3
ﻓﻴﻪ.
2ـ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻡ ﻳﻘﺒﺢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ؛ ﻓﻤﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ ﺗﻌ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﺣ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ،
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺋﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﻗﺒﻴﺢ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺿﻤﺎﺭ ﻭﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻓﻜﺄﻧﱠـﻪ
4
ﻗﺎﻝ:ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻡ ﻓﺄﻋﻄﻪ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﺿﻤﺮ ﻭﺣُ ِﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻄ ،ﻟﺴﺒﻘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ.
3ــ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ،ﺮﺟ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ
ﻛﻮ ﺎ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ :ﺍﺿﺮﺏ ﺍ ﺬﻧﺐ ﺣ ﻳﺘﻮﺏ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺿﺮﺑﻪُ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﺎﺏ،
5
ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻐﻮﺍ ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺜﺒ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺇﻟـﻰ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺒ
،272ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(65/2ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ : 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(358/3ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ،
ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻮﻝ.308 ،
2ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ.222 :
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(358/3ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(531/2
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(359/3ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(532/2
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ) ،(359/3ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(533/2
122
ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ 1،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻟﺮﺃﻳﻪ ﺎ ﻳﺄ :
] :ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﺮﺑﻮﺍ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻴﺘﻴﻢ ﺇﻟﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﻫﻲ ﺃ ـﺴﻦ ﺘـ ﻳﺒﻠـ
1ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ Υ
3
ﺃﺷﺪﻩ 2،[...ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻠ ﺃﺷ ﱠﺪﻩ.
2ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ...] :Υﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﺮﺑﻮﻫﻦ ﺘ ﻳﻄﻬﺮ 4،[...ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﳚـﻮﺯ
ﻗﺮ ﱠﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻬﺮﻥ ﺣ ﻳﺘﻄﻬﺮﻥ 5،ﻭﺍ ﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺎﻟ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ.
3ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﻚ :ﺍﺿﺮﺏ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﺣ ﳚﻠ ؛ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟـﻀﺮﺏ ﰲ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﻠﻮﺱ ﻓﻬﻮ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻮﱠﺯ ،ﻳﺼﺢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻹﳊﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳـ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﻨـﺰﻟﺔ ﻗﻮﻟﻚ :ﺍﺿﺮﺏ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃ ﻌﻨﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺣـﺎﻝ
6
ﺍﳉﻠﻮﺱ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺳﻴﱠﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻚ :ﺍﺿﺮﺏ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﺣ ﳚﻠ .
4ــ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻮﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻛﻘﻮﻟﻚ :ﻻ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﺣـ
ﻳﻌﻄﻴﻚ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﺭﺍ ،ﺃﻭ ﺣ ﻳﻌﻄﻴﻚ ﻓﺮﺳﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﺣ ﻳﺒﺪﺃﻙ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻨﻘـﻴﺾ
7
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ،ﻭ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺃﺑﻄﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(529/2ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(65/2ﺑﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ :ﺗﻴﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮﻳﺮ ).(101/1
2ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻧﻌﺎﻡ.152 :
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(529/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ).(357/2
4ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ.222 :
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(529/2
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(530/2
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(530/2
123
ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻋﻮ ﺍﻹﺿﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍ ﺳﺪﻳﺪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔـ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻼ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﻮﻗ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺿﻤﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍ ﱠﺩﻋﻰ ﺍﻹﺿﻤﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ 2،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﺎ ﺍﻹﺿﻤﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻟﺴﺎ
ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻌ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ.
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺩﻋﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻹﺿﻤﺎﺭ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻐﻮﺍ ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋـﺪﺓ ﻓﻴـﻪ،
ﻓﻤﺪﻓﻮ ﺎ ﺳﺒ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻮﻗﺎ 3،ﻭﰲ ﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻗ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻻ ﻳُﻮﺍﻓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺯﻋﻤﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻮﻗﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻋﻨـﺪﻧﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ.
ﺏ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻨـﺰﻟﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻚ :ﺃﻋ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺎ ﺇﻥ ﺟﺎﺀﻙ،
ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍ ﻲﺀ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍ ﻲﺀ ﻣﻮﻗﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻪ :ﻻ ﺗﻌـ
ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﺣ ﳚﻲﺀ؛ ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺀ ﺣ ﳚﻲﺀ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍ ﻲﺀ ﻓﻤﻮﻗﻮ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﳚﻮﺯ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺀ ﻭﺍ ﻨﻊ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻘﻮﻟﻨﺎ :ﻻ ﺗﻄﺄ ﺍﳊﺎﺋﺾ ﺣ ﺗﻄﻬﺮ ،ﻗﺪ ﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻮ ﺀ
4
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺮ ،ﻟﻄﺮُﻭﺀ ﺍﻹﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻮﻩ ،ﻓﺒﻄﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻞ ﻧ ﺮ ،ﻓﺘﻨـﺰﻳﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻓﻴـﻪ ﺑُﻌـﺪ؛ ﻷﻥ
ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺘﻌﻠ ﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣُﺘﻌﻠ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ،ﺃﺿ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ 5،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺍ ﱠﺩﻋﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻨﻄﻮﻗﺎ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻟﻠﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺃﺻﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺑﻼ ﺧﻼ ،
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﻗ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻨﻜﺒﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ
ﻜﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺼ ﺎﺏ ﺷﻲﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﱠﺰﻳﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺧﺮ.
124
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺜﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﳊﺎﺋﺾ ﻓ ﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻞ ﻧﺰﺍﻋﻨﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺳﻘﻮ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﺎﻹﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ...] :Υﻓﻼ ﺭﻓﺚ ﺃﻗﻮ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻮ ﺀ ﳑﻨﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﺒ
ﻭﻻ ﻓﺴﻮ ﻭﻻ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤ 1،[...ﻓﺒﻄﻞ ﺬﺍ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ.
2ــ ﺧﺎﻟ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﺣﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﺳﺘ ﺴﻨﻪ،
ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺘ ﺴﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺮﻭﺀ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻹﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻨـﻊ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻮ ﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻘ ﺇﺑﺎﺣﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﻬﺮ ،ﻭﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜِﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ
2
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍ ﻌﻠ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ.
ﻭﲢﺮﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻫﻮ ﺃﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﻮﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻻﺳـﺘﻔﻬﺎﻡ ،ﻭُﻧ ﺎﻟﻔـﻪ ﰲ
ﻣﺮﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺎﻓﲔ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻳﺘﻮ ﱠﺳﻠﻮﻥ ﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭﻩ؛ ﻭﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻡ ﺎ ﺣﺴُﻦ ﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺣﺴُﻦ ﰲ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ
3
ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭ ﺴﻦ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻳﺮﺍﺩ ،ﺃﻥ ﺣُﺴﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻡ ﺳﺎﺋ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺃﻧﻮﺍ ﺍ ﻔﻬـﻮﻡ؛
ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻠﺐ ﻟ ﻭﺿﺢ ﻭﺩﻓﻊ ﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻨﱠﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ
4
ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ،ﻓﻠﺬﺍ ﺍﺳﺘ ﺴﱠﻨﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻡ ﺣ ﺗﺮﺗﻘﻲ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺺﱠ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻘ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻢ.
ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺷﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺳﺪﻳﺪ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ
ﻣﻮﻛﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﺍ ﻜﻠ ﻣﺮﻓﻮ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻨﺎ ُﺣﺠﱠﺔ.
3ــ ﺍﻋﺘﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ؛ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ
ﺎﻟ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻞ ﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﲔ ﻭ ﺎ:
125
ﺃ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻻ ﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺒﻮ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺧـﺮ ﻌـ
ﺧـﺮ ﺧﺮ؛ ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻪ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﻟﺜﺒﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻻ ﺘﻨﻊ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺷـﺮ
1
ﻟﺜﺒﻮﺗﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻼﻣﺎ ﻟﻠ ﻜﻢ.
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍ ﺭﺟﻴﺢ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺩﻟ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ
2
ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺃﻟﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﻳﺴﺘ ﻬﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﻬﻮﻡ.
ﻭﻗﻴﺎﺳﻪ ﻟﻠﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃ ﻌ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻧﻔﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻬـﻲ
ﺣﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﻞ ﺍﻟﻨـﺰﺍ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺒﻮ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺧﺮ ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻌﺘ ،ﱠﳑﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻔﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﺎ؛ ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻳﺔ ﺍﺑﺘﻼﺀ ﺍﻟﻴﺘﺎﻣﻰ.
ﺏ ـ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻓﺮ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻟﻚ :ﺍﺿﺮﺑﻮﺍ ﺍ ﺸﺮﻙ ﺣ ﻳﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻟﻚ :ﺍﺿﺮﺑﻮﺍ
ﺍ ﺸﺮﻙ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ،ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺏ ﻭﻋﻠﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻨـﻊ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺒﻮ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ،ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻓﻼ ﺘﻨﻊ ﺒﻮ
ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺏ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻹ ﺎﻥ ﻌ ﺧﺮ ﻳﻀﺮﺏ ﻟﻪ؛ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻ ﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ،ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻣـﻦ ﻗـﺮﺏ
3
ﺍﳊﺎﺋﺾ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻬﺮ ﻟﻄﺮﻭﺀ ﺍﻹﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻞ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ،ﻓﺜﺒ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ.
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﱠﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﺴﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﺍ ﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻐﺘﲔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﻣﺴﻠﻜﻬﺎ ﰲ
ﻛﻠﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺗﲔ 4،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺒﻮ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺏ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﻟﺜﺒﻮ ﻣﻌ ﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻼ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺔ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﰲ
126
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺎ 1،ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺮﺏ ﺍ ﺸﺮﻙ ﻭﻗﺮﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺋﺾ ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﻥ ﺳـﻠﻤﺎ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍ ﻌﺎﺭ ،ﺣﻜﻤﻨﺎ ﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭ ﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺑﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ؛ ﻭﺇﻻ ﺃﺧﺮِﺝ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ
2
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒ .
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ
1ـ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ؛ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻟﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻴُﺘﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﺘﻴﻢ
ُﺧﺺﱠ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺿﻌﻔﻪ ﻭﻗﻠﺔ ﻧﺎﺻﺮﻩ ،ﻓﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﻟ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳُﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﻬﻲ
ﻋﻦ ﻤﻮ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﲔ ،ﻭ ﺎ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻷﺣﺴﻦ 3،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻧﺼﻮ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻮﻳﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ.
2ــ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺇﻟﺰﺍﻡ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻠﻪ ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺎ ﻻ ﺘ
ﺑﻪ؛ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻳﻄﻬﺮﻥ ﺍﻻﻏﺘﺴﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻨـﺰﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻣُﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻄـﺎ
ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻡ ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻪ ﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ :ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﻄﻬﺮﻥ؛ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻏﺘﺴﻠﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺎﺀ ،ﺗﻌﻠ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻫـﺬﻳﻦ
4
ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﲔ ﺘﻤﻌﲔ.
3ـ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻌﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﺑﻄـﺎﻝ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ؛ ﻻ ﻳ ِﺮﺩُ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻳ ِﺮﺩُ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﻟﻠﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺠﱠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺒﻮ
ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮ ﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻌ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻗﻴـﺪ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﻮﺩ ﺃﻭﺻﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﻌ ﺍ ﻘﱠﻴﺪ 5،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻼ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻟﻜﻼﻣﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ.
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻩ ﺍﻹ ﺎ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻨﺎ :ﺍﺿﺮﺏ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿـﺮﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺣـﺎﻝ
ﺍﳉﻠﻮﺱ؛ ﻓﻼ ﻔﻰ ﺑﻄﻼﻧﻪ.
4ـ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻮ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮ ﲔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻣﻀﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻼ
ﺩﺍﻋﻲ ﻟﻠﺘﱠﻜﺮﺍﺭ.
127
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﻼﺀ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻗﻮﻡ ﻗـﻴﻼ ﻭﺃﻗـﻮ
ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺮﺟﺢ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺑﺼﻔﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻣﻨﻄﻮﻗﺎ.
ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﺋﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻓﻠﻮ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ،ﺮﺟ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮ ﺎ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ
ﻛ ﺍﺀ ﻧﻔﺎﺓ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺘ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮ ﺑﺼﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻮﻗﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻌﻔﻪ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗـﻮﺓ
ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻭﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﺪﱠﻡ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺗﺒﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺍ ﱠﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺗﻘﺪ ﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) (524/2ﻭﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(420/6ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴـﺪ )،(278/3) (45/2
ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ :ﻛﺸ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﺍﺭ ).(374/2
2ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(524/2ﻭﻫﻮ ﻧﻔ ﺻﻨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﻭﺍﳉﻮﻳ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ)،(337/3
ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ).(175/1
3ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(524/2
4ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(524/2
128
ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻭﺍﳊ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺠﱠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺠﻌﺔ 1،ﻭﺧﺎﻟ
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻭﻟﺰﻣﺘﻪ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻠﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻣﺜﻼ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﱠﻤﺪ εﺑﺎﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻧﻔﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ.
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﺴﻜﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓ ﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻞ ﻧﺰﺍﻋﻨﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔـﺔ ﰲ
2
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﻮﺍ ﻦ ﺑﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺋﻦ ﻻ ﳚﻌﻠﻪ ﺣﺠﺔ؛ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﻨﺔ ﻻ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﻭﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣـﺬﺍﻫﺐ
ﺘﻠﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺘﺠﲔ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻴﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻤﻠﺔ ﺷﺮﻭ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻳﺮ ﺑﻄﻼﻧﻪ
ﻠﺔ ﻭﺗﻔﺼﻴﻼ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺮﺗﺒ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺎﺭ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﱠﺔ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﺮ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺎﻟﻔﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺍ ﻮﺍﺯﻧﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﻠﺼﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺿﻌ ﺃﺩﻟـﺔ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﺭﺟ ﺎﻥ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺎﻟﻔﻴﻪ ،ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﻧﻮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓ ﻣﻊ
ﺎﻫﲑ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺻ ﱠﺢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﻟﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻪ.
129
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟﺚ :ﺃﺛﺮ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ،ﺳﻨﺴﺘﺠﻠﻲ ﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺍ ﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻨﻨ ﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺄﺧﺬﻩ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻣﻪ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﱄ ﺍ ﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟـﺬﻱ
ﻳﻔﺘﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘ ﻤ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺟﺘـﻬﺎﺩﺍ ﰲ
ﻣﺒ ﺜﲔ ،ﺃﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺎﻣﻼ .
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍﺕ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ :ﺭﺩ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺭ ) ،(11/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ) ،(420/1ﺍﻟﺰﺣﻴﻠﻲ :ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ).(517/1
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﺰﻱ :ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ،46 ،ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ) ،(215/1ﺍﻟﺪﺳﻮﻗﻲ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺳـﻮﻗﻲ
) ،(290/1ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺒﺎ :ﺗﺒﻴﲔ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻟﻚ ).(297/1
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(217/1ﺍﻟﺰﺣﻴﻠﻲ :ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ).(517/1
ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻭﻗﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،5ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻗﻴ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ﺭﻛﻌﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ، 579ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺟﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺭﻛﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .608
129
ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ؛ ﻓﺎﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺘ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺳـﻠﻤﺘﻢ
ﻭﺇﻻ ﻧﻘﻠﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻨﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺣﺠﱠﺔ
ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍ ﻼ ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ρﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻗ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍ ﺪﺭﻙ ﻣـﺪﺭﻛﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﻛﺎ ﳊﻜﻤﻬﺎ ﻛﻤـﺎ ﻟـﻮ
1
ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ".
ﻓﻨ ﻦ ﻧﻠ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺄﻧ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﲔ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ
ﺑﻪ ،ﺑﻴﱠﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺮﻳ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ρﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻗـﺼﺪ ﺇﱃ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻛﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳُﺪﺭﻙ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻗ ،ﻓﺘﻘﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻻ ﻗﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺑـﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﻗﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻛﻌﺔ ﻟﻴ ﰲ ﻣﻌ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﻌﺔ ـﺎﻝ؛ 2ﻭﻣـﻦ
ﻓﺎ ﺪﺭﻙ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻷﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻛﻌﺔ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻛﻤﻦ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻡ ﺎ ﺃﺻﱠﻠﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺣﺼﻠ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ.
130
ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺿﻮﺀ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻗـ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺼﻞ ﺑﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻗ ،ﺍﺳﺘُﺜﻨِﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﺒ
1
ِﻟﻮُﺭُﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﺼﺺ ،ﻭﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻤﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻨﻔ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﻋﻀﱠﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻤﻢ ﰲ ﻭﻗ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻗـ ،
2
ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻐﻦ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻤﻢ؛ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳚﺰﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻤﻢ ﻛﺎﻟﻮﺍﺟﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺀ".
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺿﻌ ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺴﻚ ﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻘـﻮﻝ ﺑـﻪ ،ﺃﻣﱠـﺎ
ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍ ُﺩ ُﻩ ﳊﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻧﻔﺎ ﻓﻮﺟﻴﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﺘﻴﻤﻢ ﻗﺒـﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻗـ ﻻ
ﻳﻨﻄﻠ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣُﺴﻤﱠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﺟﺪ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺑﻴﺢ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻤﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻹﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺮﻭﺋﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ
3
ﺮﻭﺀ ﺍ ﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻗ .
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻤﻮﺍﻓﻘﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺻ ﻴ ﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺮﻳ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻻ ﺍ ﻳﺔ.
131
ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺘﲔ ﺑﻨﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻓﺎﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﺑﻄﻠ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺪﻝ ﻋﻦ
1
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ".
ﻭﺍ ﻌ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻌ ﻴﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﻮ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺎﻥ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ
ﺼﻴﺺ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻨﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ،ﻳﺪﻝ ﺑ ﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎ .
ﻭﰲ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺟﻴﻪ ،ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻲ ﻋـﻦ
ﺿﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍ ﻌ 2،ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳُﺴﻔِﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻭﺟﺎﻫﺘﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﻣﻊ ﺗﺒﻨﻲ ﺑُﻄﻼﻧﻪ ،ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺑ ﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﺑﻄﻠ ﻓﺎﺋـﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻫﻮ ﻋﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻨﱠﺎ ﻧُﺪﻧﺪِﻥ ﺣﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻨﺎ ﳊﺠﻴﱠﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
ﺇﺫﻥ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺴﻮ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﺍﻟﻠﻬ ﱠﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳُﻌﻀﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺎﺱ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳُـﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻓﻴـﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳊ ﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﺪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻧﺺ ﻳﺪﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﻮ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺻﻞ ﺧﻼ ﺫﻟﻚ.
132
ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺓ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ..." :ρﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻊ ﺍﷲ ﻦ ﺪﻩ؛ ﻓﻘﻮﻟـﻮﺍ:
ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﻭﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ" 1،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﻝ ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﺍ ﺎﻟ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﻭﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻤـﺪ،
2
ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺄﻣﻮﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻊ ﺍﷲ ﻦ ﺪﻩ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺺ
ﺻﻮﱠﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻳ ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻓﻘـﺪ ﺧـ ﱠ
ﺺ ﺍ ﺄﻣﻮﻡ ﺑﻠﻔ ﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨـﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻠﻔ ﻭﺧ ﱠ
ﺘﺺ ﺑﻪ ،ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻭﺇﻻ ﺑﻄﻞ ﻣﻌ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ،ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻛﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻛﻦ ،ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﰲ ﺣ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ
3
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺠﻮﺩ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍ ﺄﻣﻮﻡ ﻛﺎﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﻼ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ."...
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺮﺍﺀ ﱄ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺿﻌﻔﺎ ،ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻫـﻮ
ﻋﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺇ ﺒﺎﺗﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮﻩ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻨﱠﺎ ﻻ ﻧُﺴﻠﻢ ﻟﻪ
ﺑﺄﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍ ﺧﺮ؛ ﻓﻠﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ
4
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﲢﻤﻴﺪ ﺍ ﺄﻣﻮﻡ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺗ ﻳﺪﻩ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ .
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺿﻌﻴ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺘﲔ؛ ﺃﻭﻻ ﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺺ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻳﺮ ﺗﺒﻌـﺎ
5
ﻟﻠﺒﺎﻗﻼ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺎﺭ ﺍ .
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ﺿﻌﻔﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﺪ ﻓﻼ
ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؛ 6ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻤﻮﺍﻓﻘﺘﻪ ﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﻏﲑ ﻛﺎ .
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻣﲔ ﺧﻠ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،47ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘـﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺫﺍﻥ،
ﺑﺎﺏ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،796ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﻤﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻣﲔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .409
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ).(215/1
3ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ).(68/2
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮ ﻲ :ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﻴﻊ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﻊ ).(53/1
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) (673/2ﻭﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ .88 ،
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﺎ :ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎ ) ،(235/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺒ ) ،(199/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺎﺩﻳ :ﺎﻟ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﻛﲑ.43 ،
133
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ :ﻜﻢ ﺍﻹ ﺮﺍﻡ ﺑ ﲑ ﻟﻔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ
ﺃﺑـﻮ ﺫﻫﺐ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ 1،ﻭﺧـﺎﻟ
2
ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻓﺠﻮﱠﺯﻩ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻟﻔ ﺃﻓﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻌ ﻴﻢ.
3
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ،ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ..." :ρﲢﺮ ﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ ،ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘـﺴﻠﻴﻢ"،
ﻓﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﲢﺮ ﻬﺎ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﻓﻜﺄﻧﱠﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻴﻊ ﲢﺮ ﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻘـﻮ ﻢ:
4
ﻋﻠﻢ ﻓﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ ﻮ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻧﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺩﻟﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻ ﺔ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺪﻳ ﺃ ﻫﺮﻳﺮﺓ τﻗﺎﻝ:
"ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ρﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻳﻜ ﺣﲔ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ 5،"...ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻨـﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨ ρﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻤﻮﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ.
6
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(178/1ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟـﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(167/2ﺍﻟﺪﺳـﻮﻗﻲ :ﺣﺎﺷـﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺳـﻮﻗﻲ
) ،(367/1ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ :ﺍ ﻤﻮ ) ،(177/3ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ) ،(256/1ﺍ ﺮﺩﺍﻭﻱ :ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎ ).(41/1
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻤﺎﻡ :ﺷﺮ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﺮ ) ،(283/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ :ﺭﺩ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺭ ).(157/2
3ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮﺀ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،61ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ
ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﻮﺭ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،3ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﻪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺳﻨﺘﻬﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﻮﺭ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،275ﻣﻦ
ﺣﺪﻳ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ ،ﻭﺻ ﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﰲ ﺍ ﻤﻮ ).(175/3
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ ،25 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(178/1ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) (167/1ﺷﺮ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺢ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ 53 ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ) ،(84/2ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﻧﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻭ ﺎﺭ ) ،(178/2ﺍ ﻦ :ﺃ ﺮ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ .189 ،
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋ ﱠﺪ ﻓﺮﻳ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻻ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﻮ ﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ) ،(179/1ﺍﺑﻦ
،243ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ) ،(518/3ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ).(184/5 ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ،
5ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺫﺍﻥ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺠﻮﺩ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،789ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ
ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺧﻔﺾ ﻭﺭﻓﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .392
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) 315/1ﻭ ،(308ﺑﻮﺑﺸﻴﺶ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ.428 ،
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(27/2
134
ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺇ ﺎﻟﻪ ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏُ ،ﺟﻨُﻮﺣُﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺍﳊ
ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺃﱠﻧ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍ ﻦ ﻋﺪﱠﺓ ،ﻓﺄﻟﻔﻴﺘﻪ ﻣﻠﺘﺰﻣﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺮﻳ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ 1،ﻏﲑ
ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ ﺻﻮﱠﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ρﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻟ ﻣﺮ ﺍ ﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻼﺓ 2،ﻭﻳﺒﺪﻭ
ﱄ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺾ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺍﻓﻘﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺇﻓـﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻌـﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺒـﻮﻱ
ﻟﻠﻮﺟﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ.
ﻭﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﻼ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻬﲔ ﻻ ﻠﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻝ؛ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺟـﻮﺏ ﻻ ﻳـﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍ ﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹ ﻼ ،ﻻ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺮ ﺎ ﰲ ﺻ ﱠﺔ
3
ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺧﺮ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ،ﺣ ﻟﻮ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺄﻣﺮ ﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﻪ.
ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺻﻼ ﺧﺮ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻟﻠﻘﻴﺎﺱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﺝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ 4،ﻟﻴ ﻠﺺ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﻪ ﰲ ﺻ ﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻧﻲ
ﺃﺳﺘﺒﻌﺪﻩ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺗﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ.
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺼﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣُﻌﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍ .
128ﻭ.130 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) (278/1ﻭ) 27/2ﻭ 53ﻭ 130ﻭ (131ﻭ) ،(203/4ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ.57 ،
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ).(170/1
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﺎ :ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎ ) ،(231/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(178/1ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ).(167/2
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(188/1ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ :ﺍ ﻤﻮ ) ،(316/3ﺍﺑـﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣـﺔ :ﺍ ﻐـ )،(623/1
ﺍﻟﺪﺳﻮﻗﻲ :ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺳﻮﻗﻲ ).(379/1
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻤﺎﻡ ) ،(322/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ :ﺭﺩ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺭ )،(121/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺒ ).(205/1
135
ﺺ ﻣﻨـﻪ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺸﺮ ،ﺃﻭ ﺃﻋﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻘﻮﻟﻚ :ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ ﺃﺧـ ﱠ
ﺺ ﻣﻦ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺧﻼ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻛﻘﻮﻟﻚ :ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺃﺧ ﱠ
2
ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺻ ﱠ ﱠﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺪﻳ ﻋﺘﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ 3ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﺻـﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻣـﻊ
ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ρﻓﺴﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺣﲔ ﺳﻠﻢ" 4،ﻓﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻤﻮﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺪ
ﻗﺎﻝ " :ρﺻﻠﻮﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻤﻮ ﺃﺻﻠﻲ".
5
ﻓﻜﺄﻧﱠﻪ ﺗﻨـﺰﱠﻝ ﻣﻊ ﺎﻟﻔﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻳُﺴﻠﻤُﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻷﻭﱠﻝ ،ﺃﻟﺰﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ
6
ﻟﻠﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﺍ ﻤﻞ ﺍ ﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﺍ ﻤﻞ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺟﻮﺍ ﺎ ﻛﺎﻟ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺩﺍﻋﻲ ﻟﻠﺘﱠﻜﺮﺍﺭ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(189/1ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﻧﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻭ ﺎﺭ ) ،(317/2ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺳﺒ ﺮﳚﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ :ﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍ ) ،(253/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ ،243 ،ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ).(199/2
ـ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺘﺒﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﻋﺘﺎﺏ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻼﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺍ ﺰﺭﺟﻲ ﺷﻬﺪ ﺑﺪﺭﺍ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﻪ ψ 3
136
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺭﻛﻌﺔ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟـﺼﻼﺓ ﻓﻘـﺪ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ
1
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ".
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺻ ﱠ ﱠﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ؛ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑـﻪ،
2
ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﻛﺎ ﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻳﺪﺭﻛﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ.
ﻓﻨ ﻦ ﻧﺮ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳُﻌﺮﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻭ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺣـ
ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺼﻨﻴﻌﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴـﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻫـﺬﻩ
3
ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺳﺎﺋ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺟﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺧﻔﻴﻪ.
ﻏﲑ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮﺭﺩ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍ ـﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﻣﺎ ﺃﺩﺭﻛﺘﻢ ﻓﺼﻠﻮﺍ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺗﻜﻢ ﻓﺎﻗﻀﻮﺍ" 4،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭ ؛ ﻓﻜﻴـ
ﻳﻘﻴ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻛﻌﺔ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺟﺰﺀﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﻹﻣـﺎﻡ
ﺃﺻﻼ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﱠﻝ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ،ﻷﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺎﻟﺒـﻪ
ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺴﺠﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻮ ﻗﺒﻠﻴﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﻳﺎ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻬﺪ ﺍﻷﺧـﲑ ،ﺧﻼﻓـﺎ
ﻟﻠﻤﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻤﻮﺍ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺻﻼﺗﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺳﺠﺪ ﻟﻠﺴﻬﻮ ﺑﻨﻮﻋﻴﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﱠـﻪ
5
ﻳُﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺭﻛﻌﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺴﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ.
ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻓﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺧﻠ ﻣﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺃﻗـﻞ ﻣـﻦ
ﺭﻛﻌﺔ ﻳﻨﺴ ﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺄﻣﻮﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺰﻣﻪ ﺇ ﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻗﺼﺮﺍ ،ﺯﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﰲ
137
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺣﻘﻘـﻪ ﻫـﻮ
1
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ.
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺗﱠﻀﺢ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﻮﻳﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻛﻌﺔ ﻦ
ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺃﺻﻼ ﻞ ﻧ ﺮ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) (261/2ﻭ) ،(223/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ).(263/1
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(168/1ﺍ ﺮﺩﺍﻭﻱ :ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎ ) ،(454/1ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﻧﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻭ ﺎﺭ ).(76/2
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ).(112/2
4ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﺼﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﰲ ﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 34ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ
ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺏ ﺿﻴﻘﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 361ﻋﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﰲ ﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺻﻔﺔ ﻟﺒﺴﻪ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .516
5ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(230/2
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(335/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺒ ).(202/1
138
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻣﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻏﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻹﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗ ﻦ ﺻـﻠﻰ ﰲ
ﻮﺏ ﻣﻊ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺒﻌﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺍ ﻠﻌ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟ ﻭﺻﻠﺘﻨﺎ.
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻧﺘ ﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍ ﺸﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،57ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟـﺼﻼﺓ،
ﺑﺎﺏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺍ ﺴﺠﺪ ﻓﻠﲑﻛﻊ ﺭﻛﻌﺘﲔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،444ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺼﺮﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﺳﺘ ﺒﺎﺏ ﲢﻴﺔ
ﺍ ﺴﺠﺪ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،714ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺃ ﻗﺘﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(405/2ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻗﺎ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻗﺎ ) ،(398/1ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺩﻗﻴ ﻳﻨـﺎﺯ ﰲ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﰲ
ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻣﻪ ) ،(51/2ﻭﻟﻠﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻧ ﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﻘﺮﻱ ) (459/2ﺭﻗﻢ 215؛ ﻓﻔﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺧﺮ.
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(298/2
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳﺎ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ) ،(126/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ) ،(462/2ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ :ﺍ ﻤﻮ ) ،(231/5ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺍ ﻤﺎﻡ :ﺷﺮ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﺮ ) ،(181/2ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ).(91/2
139
ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ.
1
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻐ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻣﺎﺋﺔ ﺷﺎﺓ"،
ﺣﻴ ﺩﻝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺻ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻓﺔ ،ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺼﻮ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﻓـﺈﻧﱠﻬﻢ
ﺃ ﻠﻮﺍ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮ ﻦ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻢ ﺃﺩﻟـﺔ
2
ﺃﺧﺮ ﺍﺗﱠﻜ ﻭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻧُﺼﺮﺓ ﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻋﻠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ..." :ﻭ ﺘﻤﻞ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺼﺪ
ﺇﱃ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﺎﻣﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺫﻛﺮ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ،ﻭ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮ ،ﻭ ﺘﻤﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ρﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻟﻴﻨ ﱠ
ﺺ
3
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﱠﺎﺋﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻠ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺇﳊﺎ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻓﺔ ﺎ ،ﻓﻴ ﺼﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺟﺮ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ".
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺍﻟ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻫـﺎ ﰲ
ﺳﺒﺐ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ،ﻓﻜﺄﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺬﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻟﺘـﺮﻛﻬﻢ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮﺿﻊ ،ﺭﻏﻢ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ.
ﻭ ﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﺷﺘﺮ ﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﱠﻮﻡ؛ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﺘﺼ ﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ
ﻻ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﺎ ﺗﻮ ﱠﻫﻤﱠﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻫﻢ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻌﱠﺪﻭﻩ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ..." :ﺍﻋﻠـﻢ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﳊﻨﻔـﻲ ـﺪﻳ
ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻓﺔ؛ ﻓﲑﺩ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ؛ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟـﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻨـﻪ ﻻ
4
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻧ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ".
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺿﻤﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻴﻘ ﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻴﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍ ﻘﺼﻮﺩ.
140
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ :ﻜﻢ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻄ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺼﺮ ﻣﻠﻜﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ
ﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻓﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴـﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺒﻮ ﺍﻟﺰﻛـﺎﺓ ﰲ ﻣـﻠﻚ
2
ﺍ ﻠﻴﻄﲔ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻗﺼﺮ ﻣﻠﻜﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ 1،ﻭﺫﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﻣُﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﺪﻳ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ " :τﻭﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻐـ
ﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﺷﺎﺓ ﺷﺎﺓ" 3،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺩﻝ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ﰲ ﻣـﺎﻝ
4
ﺣ ﻳﺒﻠ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺍﺳﺘﺼﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻋﺪﱠﺩ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻟـﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻤﻨـﻬﺎ
ﻠﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻭﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺑﻞ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ" 5،ﺣﻴ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﻟﻴ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﻠﻄﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻ ﱠ ﱠﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﺃﻳﱠﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ؛ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍ ﻨﻔﺮﺩ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﲡﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﺑﺎ ﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﺍ ﺎﻟ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻣﻲ.
ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻟﻴﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺃ ـﺮ
6
ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻨﻄﻮﻗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﻮ ﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ ،ﻓﺜﺒ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻟﻴﻠﲔ.
ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻳـﺪ ﻧﻔـﻲ
ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻧﻔﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺑﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍ ﻤ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ
ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻐ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ
7
ﺷﺎﺓ ،ﻭ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺣﻜﻤﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﻠ ،ﺇﻻ ﻦ ﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ."...
141
ﻓ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﰲ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻋﻠﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻌﻨﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺑﻮﺿﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﺣﺼﻠ ﻣﻦ ﺮﻳ ﺧﺮ
ﺳﻮ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(299/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(47/2ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(161/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ:
ﺍ ﻐ ) ،(686/2ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ) ،(130/2ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﻧﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻭ ﺎﺭ )(194/4
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳﺎ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ) ،(199/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ :ﺭﺩ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺭ ).(258/3
3ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻜﻴﻠﺔ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،52ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺑـﺎﺏ ﺻـﺪﻗﺔ
ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1405ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﲔ،
ﺭﻗﻢ ،984ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ.
4ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(303/3
142
ﺑﻴﱠﻦ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﺳﻴﺎ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ؛ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ρﱠﺎﻫـﺎ
ﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﻮﺍﻟﻬﻢ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻬﺮﺓ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻠﻢ ﻻ ﻟﻠﻜﺎﻓﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υ
2
ﺗﻄﻬﺮﻫﻢ ﻭﺗﺰﻛﻴﻬﻢ ﺑﻬﺎ 1،[....ﻓﺪﻟ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﻻ ﺗﻄﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣُﺠﻤﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻳ ﻬﺮ ﱄ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ؛ ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺃﻥ
ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺮﱠﺟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻞ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﺮﱠﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﻟﻴـﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ.
ﻟﺬﺍ ﻋﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﻓﻘﻴﱠﺪﻫﺎ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ،ﺯﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﺷﻐﻞ ﻟﻠﺬ ﱠﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟ ﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺺ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺼ ﺎﺏ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﻴ ﺣ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻟﻴ ﺑﺈﺑﺎﺣﺔ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻧﱠﻤـﺎ
ﻫﻲ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻴ ﺑﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﺔ ،ﻭ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺭﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﻧﺴ ﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﱠـﺴ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ
3
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ.
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﻴﱠﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺼﺐ ﰲ ﺇ ﺎﻟﻪ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺿﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻟ ﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻷﺻـﻠﻴﺔ،
4
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻓﻮﺟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﲔ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ.
ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺻﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻻ ﺍﻷﻭﱠﻝ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻣﺒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﺴﺠﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺗﻔﻄﻨﻪ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﺩﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳـﺘﻨﺎﺩ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟ ﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ.
143
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻟ ﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ :ﻫﻞ ﺐ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻋﻠ ﻗﺎﺗﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ﻄ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ﺧﻄﺄ 1،ﻭﺧـﺎﻟ ﺃ ـﺪ ﰲ
ﺇﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺘﲔ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍ ﻘﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻌﻠﻘﻮﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺻـ
2
ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ] :Υﻳﺎ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﻻ ﺗﻘﺘﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ﻭﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﺮﻡ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﻠﻪ ﻣـﻨﻜﻢ ﻣﺘﻌﻤـﺪﺍ،[...
ﻭﺃﻳﱠﺪﻭﻩ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﻣﱠﺔ؛ ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍ ﺘﺠﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺳﻘﻄﻮﻩ ﻟﻌﺪﱠﺓ ﺍﻋﺘﺒـﺎﺭﺍ ﻣـﻦ
3
ﺃﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ؛ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﱠﺎﻟﻔﺔ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ Υﻧ ﱠ
ﺺ
ﺺ ﻧﺎﺳﻴﺎ ﻹﺣﺮﺍﻣﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺫﺍﻛﺮﺍ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍ ﻄ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻴﱠﻦ ﺃﻥ ﱠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻌﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﻭ
ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻻ ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍ ﻄ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳚﺮ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ
ﺫﻛﺮ ،ﻓﻼ ﻣﻌ ﻟﻼﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻔﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ـﻦ ﻳﻘـﻮﻝ ﺑـﺪﻟﻴﻞ
4
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭ ﻦ ﻻ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ."...
ﻭﻻ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍ ﻄ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺘﻌﻤﺪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺻـﻨﻴﻌﻪ ﰲ
ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎﺳﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ 5،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻬﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻡ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﺼﺎ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(588/2ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳﺎ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ) ،(437/1ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐـ ﺍ ﺘـﺎﺝ
) ،(328/1ﺍﻟﺰﺣﻴﻠﻲ :ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ).(274/3
2ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺪﺓ.95 :
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(668/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ) ،(541/3ﺑﻦ ﻴﺪ :ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﲢﻘﻴ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋـﺪ
) ،(89/1ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(324/3ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ :ﺍﻟﺒ ﺮ ﺍ ﻴ ) ،(140/3ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺴﻚ ).(338/3
4ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(436/3
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ.169 ،
144
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ :ﻜﻢ ﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﻤﺘﻊ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺮ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ
ﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺮ ﺍ ﺘﻤﺘﻊ ﺪﻳﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ؛ ﻓﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﻣﺎﻟﻚ
2
ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻹﺟﺰﺍﺀ 1،ﻭﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﺯﻩ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ...] :Υﻭﻻ ﺗﺤﻠﻘﻮﺍ ﺭ ﻭﺳﻜﻢ ﺘ ﻳﺒﻠ
ﺍﻟﻬﺪ ﻣﺤﻠﻪ 3،[...ﻭ ﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ،ﺃﻧﱠﻪ Ιﻋﻠ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﳊﻠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺮ ﺍ ـﺪﻱ؛ ﻷﻥ
ﺑﻠﻮ ﺍ ﺪﻱ ﺮﻩ 4،ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﳊﻠ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ ﻣـﺎ ﻻ
ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺪﻳ ﺣﻔﺼﺔ τﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮ ـﺎ" :ﻳـﺎ
ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺣﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻢ ﻭ ﲢﻞ ﺃﻧ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﺗﻚ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﺇﻧﻲ ﻟﺒﱠـ ﱠﺪ
ﺭﺃﺳﻲ ﻭﻗﻠﺪ ﻫﺪﻳﻲ ﻓﻼ ﺃﺣﻞ ﺣ ﺃ ﺮ" 5،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺍﻟﻨ ـﺮ ﻓﻮﺟـﺐ
ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻋﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻼ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺎ ﺻﺢ ﺍﻋﺘﻼﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍ ﻌ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﳚﺐ
6
ﺇﺭﺍﻗﺔ ﺩﻣﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳚﺰ ﺮﻩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ،ﺃﺻﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﺬﺭ ﻫﺪﻳﺎ.
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻓﺄﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘ ﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺍﻹﻟﺰﺍﻡ ﻟﻠﻤ ﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﺍﻟﻘـﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑـﻪ؛
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ،ﳉﺎﺯ ﺍﳊﻠ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ،
145
ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻻ ﺧﻼ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻠ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ
1
ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺃ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺷﻴﻮﺧﻨﺎ."...
ﻭﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻻ ﻏﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ُﻳ ﺧﺬ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺘﺬﺑﺬﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴ ﻬﺮ ﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺗـﺎﺭﺓ
ﻳُﻬﻤﻠﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺇ ﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻳﺴﺘﺄﻧ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺎﻟﻔﻴـﻪ،
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻨﺎ ﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ.
ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮ ﺭﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﲔ..." :ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ
ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﻪ ،ﺃﻻ ﺗﺮ ﺃﻧﱠﻚ ﻟﻮ ﺑـﺪﺃ
ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻧ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻝ ،ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺯ ﻟﻚ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻟﻠ ﺃﻧﺎ
2
ﳚﺰ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ."...
146
ﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻨ ﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺷﺎﺭﻛﻬﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺰُﺑ ﱠﻦ ﻋﻦ ﻓﻜﺮﻧﺎ ﺃﻧﱠـﻪ
ﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍ ﺮﱠﺩ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﻟﻠﻮﺟﻮﺏ 1،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺿﺪﻩ،
ﻓﻠﻌﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍ ﻘﺪﻣﺘﲔ ﺧﻠﺺ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ.
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻷﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻐﻤﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ،
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍ ﻮﺻﻮ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊ ،ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺩ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺩﻗﻴ ..." :ﻓﻴﺴﺘﺪﻝ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻟﻠﻤﺘﻤﺘﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻡ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺩﺧﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊ ،ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻓﻘ ،ﺑﻞ ﻣﻦ
2
ﺣﻴ ﺗﻌﻠ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻮﺻﻮ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊ ".
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﱠﻨ ﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻓﻜﻼﻣﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻭﻣﺘﲔ ،ﻭﻻ
ﺷﺄﻥ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻘﺼﺪﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ .
147
ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟـﻪ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﻡ ،ﻓﺒﻘﻲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎ ـ ﺭ ﻪ ﺍﷲ ــ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻌﻠ
1
ﻭﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻓ ﻞ ﺘﻤﻞ".
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ﺇﻋﺮﺍﺿﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺗﻌﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺼ ﺎﺏ ﺍﻟ ﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻷﺻـﻠﻴﺔ؛ ﻷﻥ
ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺩﻟ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻐﻞ ﺫﻣﱠﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﻜﺔ ﺑﺎ ﺪﻱ ،ﻓﺒﻘﻲ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﻜﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ،ﻓـﻼ
ﺗﺸﻐﻞ ﺫﻣﱠﺘﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻻ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ.
ﻭﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻌﻠ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ
ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺼ ﺎﺏ ،ﻻ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻟـﻪ
ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧﻮﱠﻫ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﱠﻡ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ.
148
ﻏﲑ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺍ ﻼ ﰲ ﻧﻮﻋﻪ ،ﻓﺰﻋﻢ ﺍ ﺎﺯﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﳊﻔﻴﺪ ﻭﺗﺒﻌﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ
ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻟﻘﺐ؛ ﻭﺑﺮﱠﺭﻭﺍ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﻊ ﻳﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺟﻨ ﻟﺰﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺩﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ،ﻓﺄﻟﻔﻴﻨﺎﻫﻢ ﻳﻨﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ
ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﺿﻤﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﺟﺰﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﳉـﺪ
1
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍ ﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻨﻔ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻪ ،ﻟﻜﻨﱠﻪ ﻧﺎﺯ ﰲ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍ
ﺇﱃ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ..." :ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠ ﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻟﻴ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄـﺎﺏ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺑﺢ ﰲ ﺯﻣﻦ ﺼﻮ ،ﻭ ﺮﻳ ﺗﻌﻠ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﺮ ﻭﺍﻟـﺬﺑﺢ ﺑﺎﻷﻭﻗـﺎ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻻ ﺮﻳ ﻟﻪ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ؛ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺑﺘﻌﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﻮﻗ ﺼﻮ ،ﻛﺘ ﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ
ﺑﺎﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ ،ﻭﺑﺬ ﻪ ρﺃﺿ ﻴﺘﻪ ﺎﺭﺍ ،ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﺯﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ،ﻭ ﳚﺰ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺪﻳﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻠﺒﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻓﻠﻢ ﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻮﺟـﺪﻧﺎﻩ ﻣـﻊ ﺍﻟﺒ ـ
2
ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻠﺐ؛ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ".
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﳉﻠﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻴ ﰲ ﻭﻗ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺢ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍ ﺮﺟﻊ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ
ﻻ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺗﻐﻠﻴﺒﺎ ﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ؛ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎ ﻳﻘ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍ ﻨﺼﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺍ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻌ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﺪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻋﻨـﺪﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟـﺬﺑﺢ ﻫـﻮ
ﺍﳊ ﺮ 3،ﻓﻠ ﱠﻤﺎ ﺒ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺔ ﻭ ﻮﺍ ﺒﺘﻪ ρﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺢ ﺎﺭﺍ ﺟﻮﺍﺯﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ،ﳚﺰ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻓﻠ ﱠﻤﺎ ﻋﺪﻣﻨﺎﻩ ﺣﻜﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻨﻊ ﺍﺳﺘﺼ ﺎﺑﺎ ﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﳊ ﺮ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻻ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﺎﺯﺭﻱ :ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،337 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(248/2ﺍﻟـﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﻧﻴـﻞ ﺍﻷﻭ ـﺎﺭ
) ،(133/5ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ :ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ) ،(98/1ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ).(113/1
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) 53/4ﻭ.(194
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(248/2ﺍﻟﺸﺎ :ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎ ).(234/2
149
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻭﻓﻰ ﻟﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﻩ ﰲ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ
ﻭﻗ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺢ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻔﻲ ﻭﺟﻴﻪ؛ ﻭﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺗﻐﻠﻴﺐ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍ ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍ ﻨﺼﻮ .
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺑﻨ ﺮ ﺍﻟﻨ ρﺎﺭﺍ ،ﻓﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ ،ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺍﻹﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻓﻤ ﻞ ﻧ ﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮﻩ.
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻣﻨﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ :ﻜﻢ ﺭﻣﻲ ﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺒﺔ ﻟﻴﻼ ـ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻔ ﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺮ ـ.
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ
ﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻓﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺃ ﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻣـﻰ
2
ﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺒﺔ ﻟﻴﻼ ﳚﺰﺋﻪ 1،ﻭﺃﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﺼ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ...] :Υﻭﺍﺫﻛﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﺍﺕ 3،[...ﻭﻭﺟـﻪ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﷲ Υﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻞ ﺭﻣﻲ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ ﻗﻴـﺪ
ﺍﻟﺮﻣﻲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍ ﻌﺪﻭﺩﺍ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳ .
ﻓﺪﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻄﻠ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
4
ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﻔ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ
ﻣﺒﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ..." :ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻭﻗ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ؛ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺻﻔ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(145/2ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(265/3ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳﺎ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ )،(323/2
ﺍ ﺮﺩﺍﻭﻱ :ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎ ).(37/4
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ :ﺍ ﻤﻮ ).(104/8
3ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ203 :
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) 39/4ﻭ ،(83ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(140/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷـﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳـﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬـﺪ
) ،(247/2ﻭ ﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﱠﻧ ﺃﻗ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺻ ﱠﺮ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻻ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ.
150
ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﱄ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺑﺄﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﺍ ؛ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻌﺪﻭﺩﺍ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺍﻟﺮﻣـﻲ
1
ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻴﻞ؛ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺭﻣﻰ ﻟﻴﻼ ﺃﻋﺎﺩ."...
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ؛ ﻫﻮ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍ ﻮﺻﻮ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻳـﺎﻡ
ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﱄ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘ ﱠﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺮ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺩﻋﱠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻔﻌﻠﻪ ρ
ﺣﻴ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺟﺎﺑﺮ τﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺭﺃ ﺍﻟﻨ ρﻣﻦ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺍﺣﻠﺘﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﻣﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺣﺼﻰ ﺍ ﺬ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ" :ﺧﺬﻭﺍ ﻋﻨﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﻜﻜﻢ ﻓﺈﻧﻲ ﻻ ﺃﺩﺭﻱ ﻟﻌﻠﻰ ﻻ ﺃﻟﻘﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋـﺎﻣﻲ
2
ﻫﺬﺍ".
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻔﺮﺩﻩ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺼﻔﺘﻪ ﻓﻌﻼ ﻧﺒﻮﻳﱠﺎ ،ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎ
3
ﻟﻠﻮﺍﺟﺐ ،ﺃﻳﱠﺪﻩ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﱠﻣﻲ ُﻣﺮﺗﱠﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﺮ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﱠﻡ ﻣﻨﻌﻪ ﻟﻴﻼ.
ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣـﻊ
ﺃﺻﻞ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺗﻐﻠﻴﺐ ﻣﻌ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﺪ.
151
ﻟﻠﻘﻮﻝ ﺍ ﺸﻬﻮﺭ؛ ﻫﻲ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ﻭﻳﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﺩﻟ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻟـﻴ ﰲ
1
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ،ﻓﻼ ﳚﺰ ﺫﺑﺢ ﺍﻷﺿ ﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻨﻔ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻬﻢ؛ ﻟﻜﻨﱠﻪ ﻳﻔﺼﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻭﺟ ُﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ـﺎ
ﺩﻟ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺢ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ﻭﻳﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﳚـﺰ
ﺃﻥ ﻧُﻌﺪﻳﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻧ ﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺢ ﻟﻴﻼ ،ﻭﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﺬﺍ ﻓﺮﺃﻳﻪ
ُﻣﱠﺘﺠِﻪ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺩ ﱠﻋﻢ ﻗﻨﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻠﲔ ﺧﺮﻳﻦ ،ﺃﻭ ﻤﺎ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻛﻞ ﳊﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺿﺎﺣﻲ ﻓﻮ
ﻼ ﺔ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ 2،ﻭﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ρﺃﺑﺎ ﺍﻷﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺿ ﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺢ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑـﻊ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺣ ﱠﺮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺫﺑﺢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺿ ﻴﺘﻪ.
3
ﻭ ﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ؛ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺎﻣ ﺎﻣﻊ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﻔﺮ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ.
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺘﻤﻞ ،ﻓﻴ ﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺮ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻳﺬﺑﺢ ،ﻭ ﺘﻤﻞ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺢ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﺄﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺢ ﻋﻦ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺢ ،ﻭﺑﻜﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ.
ﻭ ﺮﺓ ﺍ ﻼ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ،ﻟﻮ ﺫﺑﺢ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻳـﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨ ـﺮ ﺟـﺎﺯ ﻟـﻪ
ﺍﻻﺩﺧﺎﺭ 4،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳُﻀﻌﻀِﻊ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻳ ؛ ﻷﻥ ـﺮﻭﺀ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤـﺎﻝ ﻳﺒﻄـﻞ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺼﻢ.
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺺ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(193/4ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(247/2ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺴﻚ ).(79/3
2ـ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺮﳚﻪ ﰲ ﺻ ﻴﻔﺔ 35ﻫﺎﻣﺶ .5
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(193/4
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮ :ﺍ ﻔﻬﻢ ) ،(376/5ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﻧﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻭ ﺎﺭ ) 133/5ﻭ.(135
152
ﻠﺪ ﺍ ﻴﺘﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻳﺪﺑ 1،ﻭﳑﱠﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ؛ ﺣﺪﻳ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ρﺃﻣـﺮ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺴﺘﻤﺘﻊ ﻠﻮﺩ ﺍ ﻴﺘﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﺑﻐ 2،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ" :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺷﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺘﺎ ،ﻭ ﻨـﻊ ﺫﻟـﻚ
3
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺘﺎ ﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﳑﱠﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ".
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ ﺑـﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ؛ ﻷﻥ
ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻤﱠﻦ ﺘ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻴ ﻗﻮﻻ ﺑﻪ ،ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﳉﻠـﺪ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﻫﻲ ﺍ ﻮ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﺗﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺍ ﻌﻠﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻮ ﻔﺮﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﺔ
ﰲ ﺗﻨﺠﻴ ﺍﻟﻠ ﻢ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻔﺮﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻨﺠﻴ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ.
ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺃﻟﻔﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﺑ ﺍﻹﻫﺎﺏ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻬﺮ" 4،ﻋﻠـﻰ
5
ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺗﺒﻴﺢ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﺮﻓﻊ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺳﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ.
ﻭﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻪ ﻧﻔﺎ ،ﻓﺎﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻪ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺒ ،ﻧﺴﺠﻞ ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﺮ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ،
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓ ﰲ ﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ ﻮﻝ
ﺍﷲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺃ ﺮ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺠﻴﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍ ﻌﺎﻣﻼ .
1ـ ﺧﺎﻟ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺮﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺷﺎﺫ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ .ﺍﻧ ـﺮ :ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳـﺎ :
ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ) ،(343/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(119/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﺰﻱ :ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴـﺔ ،32 ،ﺍﻟﻨـﻮﻭﻱ:
ﺷﺮ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ) ،(44/4ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ) ،(141/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ) ،(84/1ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﻧﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻭ ﺎﺭ ).(73/1
2ـ ﺳﺒ ﺮﳚﻪ ﰲ ﺻ ﻴﻔﺔ 54ﻫﺎﻣﺶ . 5
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(275/4
4ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺟﻠﻮﺩ ﺍ ﻴﺘﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،17ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﻴﺾ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻬـﺎﺭﺓ
ﺟﻠﻮﺩ ﺍ ﻴﺘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺑﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .366
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ 215 ،ﻭ ،224ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(270 -267/4ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ )،(119/1
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﺰﻱ :ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ.32 ،
153
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟ ﺎ :ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ
ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎ ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ
4
ﻏﲑ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻢ ﻼ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻳﻔﺼﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺷـﻲﺀ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺎﺭﺏ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻﺮ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ " :ﺍ ﻳـﺔ ﺗـﺪﻝ ﻋﻠـﻰ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ :ﺍ ﻤﻮ ) ،(72/9ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ) ،(36/11ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ :ﺭﺩ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺭ ) ،(49/10ﺍﻟﺰﺣﻴﻠﻲ:
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ ).(694/3
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(663/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﻓﺘﺎﻭ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ) ،(565/1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟـﺰﻱ :ﺍﻟﻘـﻮﺍﻧﲔ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ.131 ،
3ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺪﺓ.94 :
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﺎﺏ :ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﺎﺏ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍ ﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻌﺮﺏ ) ،(18/2ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(169/4ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ:
ﻓﺘﺎﻭ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ) ،(565/1ﺍﻟﻘﺮ :ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ).(263/6
154
ﺎ ﺐ ﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻫﻢ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﺿـﻴ ﺇﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻳـﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﲔ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ
1
ﻭﺭﻣﺎﺣﻬﻢ".
ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺑﺼﻔ ﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﺒﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻟـﻚ " :ﻭﻭﺟـﻪ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮ ﺍ ﻀﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ،ﻓﻠﻤﱠﺎ ﺃﺿـﺎ ﺍﻷﻳـﺪﻱ
2
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﺎ ﺒﲔ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍ ﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺼﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ".
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﺃﻭ ﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺣﺮ ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻳ ِﺮﺩُ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ـ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮﺍﰲ ــ ﺃﻥ
3
ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺎ ﺒﻮﻥ ﺑﻔﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭ ﰲ ﺍ ﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻌﺮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻗـﻮﻝ ﺍﺑـﻦ
4
ﻭﻫﺐ ﻭﺃﺷﻬﺐ ﰲ ﺇﺑﺎﺣﺔ ﺻﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎ .
ﻗﻠ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻄـﻼﻥ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
155
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ":ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﲢﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻪ " 1،ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺃ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﺣﻜﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺃ ـﺪ
ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺮﻣﺔ ﺻﻴﺪ ﺍ ﻮﺳﻲ ﻭﺫﺑﻴ ﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻋ ﱠﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺘـﻲ ﺗ ﻛﺪ
2
ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘ ﺮ ،ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ ،ﻟﻜﻨﱠﻪ
ُﻳﻔﺼﺢ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ 3،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﺯﻓﺔ ﺍﻻ ﱠﺩﻋﺎﺀ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻧﻔ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺧﺘـﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍ ﺘﺠﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍ ﻮﺳـﻲ ﻣـﺸﺮﻛﺎ؛
ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﻭﻻ ﺗ ﻛﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻤﺎ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺇﻧـﻪ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻴﺪﻩ ﺬﺍ ﻣﻨﺪﺭﺟﺎ ﲢ
ﻟﻔﺴ .[... 4
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﱠﻋﻲ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹ ﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺩﱠﻋﺎﻩ ﺑﻌـﺾ
ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺿﻌﻴ ﻟﺜﺒﻮ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫـﻞ
5
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﳑﻦ ُﻳﻀﻴ ُ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﺍﻹ ﺎ ﻓﻼ ُﻳﻘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻟﻪ ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
156
ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﻭﺍﻟﺨﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻤﲑ ﻟﺘﺮﻛﺒﻮﻫﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺨﻠـ ﻣـﺎ ﻻ
ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻮ [ 2،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﻟ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺼﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍ ﻴﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣـﺎ ﻳـﺪﻝ
3
ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﻠﻪ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻫﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻟـﻚ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳـﺔ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﺯﺍﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ.
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﲔ؛ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﱠﻡ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ Ιﺃﺧ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺧﻠ ﺍ ﻴﻞ ﻟﻠﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﻨﺔ ،ﻭ ﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻷﻧﻌﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳـﺔ ﺍﻟـ
ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﺧ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺧﻠﻘﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﻷﻛﻞ ،ﻓﻠﻤﱠﺎ ﻋﺪﻝ ﰲ ﺍ ﻴﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻷﻛﻞ؛ ﺩﻝ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﺑﻄﻠ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ.
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﺪﻟﻴﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺮﺍﻫﻴﺘﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺃﻫﻠﻲ ﺫﻭ ﺣﺎﻓﺮ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺃﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺣـﺎ
4
ﻛﺎﻟﺒﻐﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﳊﻤﲑ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻣﻌﺘﺼﻢ ﻟﻪ ﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻠﲔ؛ ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳـﺔ
ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺼﺮﻩ ﻟﻠ ﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺮ ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻓﻘ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻴﻞ ﺧﻠﻘ ﻟﻠﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻧﻌﺎﻡ ﺧﻠﻘ ﻟ ﻛﻞ ﺑﻨﺺ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮ ﻥ،
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ،ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﻨﺔ ﺍ ﺸﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ،
ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ،ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺎﺭ ﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻘـﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ
] :Υﻗﻞ ﻻ ﺃﺟﺪ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻲ ﺇﻟﻲ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎ ﻋﻠ ﻃﺎﻋﻢ ﻳﻄﻌﻤﻪ 5،[...ﺍﻟ ﺩﻟ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ :ﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍ )،(291/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(1145/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬـﺪ
) ،(25/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﺰﻱ :ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ،129 ،ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ ،26 ،ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ).(101/4
2ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨ ﻞ.8 :
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻣﺎﻟﻚ :ﺍ ﻮ ﺄ ،333 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(26/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟـﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(101/4ﺍﻟﺒـﺎﺟﻲ:
ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ 26 ،ﻭﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) (519/2ﻭﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(265/4
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(265/4
5ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻧﻌﺎﻡ.145 :
157
ﺳﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﻣﺒﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺰﻝ 1،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻨﻄﻮ ﻣﻘ ﱠﺪﻡ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ .
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻔﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻏﲑ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻻ ـﺮﺍﻡ
ﺷﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻭ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻳﻘﻴ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﻤﺮ ﺍﻹﻧـﺴﻴﺔ؛
ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻘﻴ ﺍ ﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻜ ﻟﻴ ﻠﺺ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺍﻫﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠـﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻤُـﺮ
2
ﺘﻠ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻤﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻘـﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺎﻹﺑﺎﺣـﺔ،
3
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺼ ﱠﺔ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﻘﻘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ.
158
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺼﺮ ﺣ ﺍﻹﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺏ ﻓﻘـ ﻣـﻊ
ﺍﺳﺘ ﺴﺎﻧﻪ ﻟﻼﺳﺘ ﺬﺍﻥ ،ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ؛ ﻭﺃﻳﱠﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ
ﻻ ﻳﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﻋﻘﺪ ﻧﻜﺎﺣﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻄﻘﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺭﺿﺎﻫﺎ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ
3
ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘ ﺍ ﻻ ﺍﻋﺘ ﻧﻄﻘﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻟ ﺏ ﺇﺟﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ.
ﺇﺫﻥ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﺎﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﲔ ﻣﺄﺧﺬ
ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺟﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﻹﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ؛ ﻭ ﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻜﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻓﺎﳊﻜﻢ ﻳﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﻌﻬﻤﺎ،
4
ﺃﻭ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﻭﻋﺪﻣﺎ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭ ﻌﺘﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻓﻤﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﻭﺍﻟﺒﻜـﺮ ﺗـﺴﺘﺄﺫﻥ ﰲ
ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ" ،ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺘﲔ:
ﺺ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑ ،ﻭ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺳﺎﺋ ﰲ ﺭﺃﻳـﻪ؛ ﺃﻭﻻ ﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺧ ﱠ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻨ ﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻠﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﺑﻨﺺ ﺃﻭ
5
ﺇ ﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺍ ﺮﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ.
ﻭﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻤﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘ ﺒﺎﺏ ،ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺮ ﺍ ﻌﱠﻨ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳـﺔ
6
ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻌﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻧﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻓﺄ ﻞ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﺭﻏﻢ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻴﻠﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺣﺼﻠ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﺑﺄﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻣﻌﺘـ ﺓ
ﻋﻨﺪﻩ.
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘ ﻤﺎﺭ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،2093ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ
ﰲ ﺇﻛﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻴﺘﻴﻤﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1109ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺮ ﻳﺰﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﺃﺑﻮﻫﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،3270ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎ :
ﺣﺴﻦ ﺻ ﻴﺢ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ).(40/3
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) 11/5ﻭ (21ﻭﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ.213 ،
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(41/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) (217/4ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ).(197/1
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(271/1ﺍ ﻣﺪﻱ :ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) ،(425/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ )،(41/3
ﺍ ﻦ :ﺃ ﺮ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ .583 ،
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) 10/5ﻭ ،(22ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(40/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ).(217/4
159
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻧﱠﻪ ُﻳﻌﺮﺝ ﺣﺘـﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍ ﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻛﺼﻨﻴﻌﻪ ﻓـﻲ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﺭﻏﻢ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ 1،ﻭﻣﺮﺩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺘ ﺇﻻ
2
ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻘﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺘﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻘﻘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ.
160
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺳﺔ :ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ﺑﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﻬﺮ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ
ﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ؛ ﻓﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪ ﺻ ﻴﺢ
ﻭﳚﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍ ﺍ ﺜﻞ 1،ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﻔﺴﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳـﺔ
2
ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳُﻔﺴ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﻭﰲ ﺃﺧﺮ ﺃ ﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﻭﺃﻭﺟﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺍ ﺜـﻞ،
ﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺴ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻣﺴﺘ ﺐ.
ﻭﳑﱠﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ...] :Υﻭﺃ ﻞ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺫﻟﻜﻢ ﺃ ﺗﺒﺘ ـﻮﺍ
ﺑ ﻣﻮﺍﻟﻜﻢ ﻣﺤﺼﻨ ﻴﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺤ .[ ...
3
ﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ":ﻓﻌﻠ ﺍﻹﺣﻼﻝ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺘﻐﻲ ﺑﺄﻣﻮﺍﻟﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺍ ﻤﺮ ﻭﺍ ﻨـﺰﻳﺮ ﻟﻴ
4
ﻟﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ".
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺻ ﱠ ﱠﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﺴ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ـﺎﻫﺮ
ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍ ﺘﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘ ﺮ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺇﳚﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﺴ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ
ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺴ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻫﺔ ،ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺍ ﺜﻞ ،ﻷﻥ ﺣﻜـﻢ
ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻮ ،ﻳﻔﺴ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻔـﻮﺍ ﻭﻻ
ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍ .
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺼﻮ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﺳﺘ ﻨﺎﺳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻـﻮﻝ
ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ،ﺑﻴﺪ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻟﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻌ ﱠﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺩﻓﻪ ﺑﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ﻫـﻮ
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻊ ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻔﺴﺎﺩﻩ ﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﻋﻮﺿﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣُﺘﻤﺴﱠﻜﻪُ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺷ ﱠﺪ ﺃﺯﺭﻩ
161
ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺿﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ﻓﻮﺟـﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔـﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﻜـﺎ
ﺑﺘ ﺮ ﻪ ﻛﺘ ﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻀﻊ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮ ﲢﺮﻳﺮﻩ ﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺃﺷﺒﻊ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺜﺎ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ
1
ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺍﺝ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻣ ﱠﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺃﻻ ﺃ ﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺣ ﺯﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﻄﺮ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) 57/5ﻭ ،(114ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ).(63/3
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻣﺎﻟﻚ :ﺍ ﻮ ﺄ ،356 ،ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ) ،(396/4ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ).(70/3
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(88/5ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳﺎ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ) ،(536/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ).(482/7
4ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ.23 :
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻣﺎﻟﻚ :ﺍ ﻮ ﺄ ،356 ،ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(89/5ﺍﻟﻘﺮ :ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ).(98/5
6ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ.24 :
162
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ... ":ﻭﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺇﻥ ﺍ ﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ،ﲢﺮ ﺃﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎ ،ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﻷﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎ ﻓﻠﻢ
ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭ ﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮ ،ﻭ ﺘﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺇﺑﺎﺣﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﻗ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺣ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺎ ﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺒﻴ ﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘ ﱠﺪﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺣـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ـﺮ ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍ ﺘﺠﲔ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺗﻌﻠﻘـﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺎ ﻋﻠ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎ ﺩﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﻬـﺎ
1
ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎ ".
ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻟ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻫﻮ ﲢﺮ ﺃﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﲢﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎ ﻓﻼ
ﺗﻌﻠ ﻟ ﻳﺔ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ ﺗﻘـﺪﻣ
ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ ﻧﻔﺎ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻼﺀ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻓ ﻣﻊ ﺗﺄﺻﻴﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ﺮﻱ.
163
ﺍﻟﻌﻨ ،ﻭ ﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﺘﻨﺒﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﻣﺔ ﻧﻜﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍ ﺴﻠﻤﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺸﺮ ﲔ ﻭ ﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻭﺧﻮ
1
ﺃﻥ ﺷﺮ ﺧﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻨ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺒ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ،ﻭ ﺃﺟﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺗﺮﺟﻴ ﺎ ﺻﺮ ﺎ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺗـﺎﺭﺓ ﳚـﻨﺢ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ،ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ..." :ﻭﺍﻷﻭﺿﺢ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ،ﺇﺑﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ
ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺷﺮ ﲔ ،ﻭﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﺗﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﻌﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ،
ﻭﻣﻨﻌﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻟﻔﺎ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺭﺩ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ] :Ιﻭﺃﻧﻜﺤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟ ﻳﺎﻣ ﻣـﻨﻜﻢ،2،[...
ﻋﺎﻣﺎ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺷﺮ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎ ـﺎ ﻭﳑـﺎ ﻼ
ﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﲔ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺳﻜ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ
ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪﺓ ،ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﻭﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪﺓ ،ﻣ ﻭﺭﺩﺗﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﺘﻌﻠ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ
3
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ،ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻤﻞ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇ ﻼﻗﻪ ﻭﺍ ﻘﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﺪﻩ."...
ﻭﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ؛ ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻴﻪ ﺟﺪﺍ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺳﺒ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ
ﺃﻓﻀﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻄﻠ ﻻ ﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻘﻴﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻤـﻞ
ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍ ﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺟﻨﺢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ
ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮ ﲔ ،ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺪﺍ ﳊﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺴﻜﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹ ﻼ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ.
ﻟﻜﻨﱠﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺧﺮ؛ ﺭﺍ ُﻳﺪﻟﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﲔ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ،
ﻭﺍﻷﻗﺮﺏ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﲔ ﻟﻠ ﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻹﺑﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺇ ﺎ ﺍﻟـﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ﰲ
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺮﺍﻫﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ 4،ψﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﻜﻰ ﺍﻟﺒـﺎﺟﻲ
ﺍﻹ ﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍ ﺎﻟ ،ﻓﻼ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺃﻥ ُﻳﺪﱠﻋﻰ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ،ﻓﺘﺼﺢ ﻟﻪ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﺸﻬﻮﺭ
5
ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﻓﺘﺎﻭ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ) ،(292/5ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(80/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮ :ﺍﳉـﺎﻣﻊ ﻷﺣﻜـﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(118/5ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ :ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ،421 ،ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ).(344/4
2ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ.32 :
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(113/5
4ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻧﻜﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺮﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .28
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(117/5
164
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻌﺔ :ﻜﻢ ﻧﻜﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻴﺔ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻜﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻴﺔ 1،ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻔ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻓﻘـﺎﻟﻮﺍ
2
ﺑﺎﳉﻮﺍﺯ.
ﻭ ﱠﳑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﻭﻣﻦ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻊ ﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﻃﻮﻻ ﺃ ﻳﻨﻜﺢ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺼﻨﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﻤ ﻣﻨﺎﺕ ﻓﻤﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻠﻜ ﺃﻳﻤﺎﻧﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺘﻴﺎﺗﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻤ ﻣﻨﺎﺕ [...؛ 3ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﻟ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ
4
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻜﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻻ ﺮﺍﻡ ﻧﻌ ﺍﻹ ﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺮﻣﺔ ﻧﻜﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻴﺔ؛ ﻟﻜﻨﱠﻪ ﺃ ﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻ ﻢ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻧﻪ.
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺣﺠﱠﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﻗـﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ :Ι
]ﻭﻻ ﺗﻨﻜﺤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺘ ﻳ ﻣﻦ[...؛ 5ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ُﻣﻨﻄِﻠ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻴـﺔ،
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ υﺍﺑﻨﺎ ﷲ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺷﺮﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ] :ﻭﻗﺎﻟ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻋﺰﻳﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﻟ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﺫﻟ ﻗﻮﻟﻬﻢ ﺑ ﻓﻮﺍﻫﻬﻢ ﻳﻀﺎﻫ ﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ
6
ﻗﺎﺗﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﺃﻧ ﻳ ﻓﻜﻮ [.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(81/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ) ،(508/7ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ).(407/4
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﺼﺎ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(204/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻤﺎﻡ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﺮ).(236/3
3ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ.25 :
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻣﺎﻟﻚ :ﺍ ﻮ ﺄ ،360 ،ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(82/3ﺍ ﻦ :ﺃ ﺮ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ ،185 ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ﻧﺎﺯ ﰲ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ).(395/1
5ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ.221 :
6ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ.30 :
165
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﻠ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ τﺑﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ ﻭﻣﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻜﺎ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ
ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ 1
" :τﻻ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺷﺮﻛﺎ ﺃﻋ ﻢ ﳑﻦ ﺟﻌﻞ ﷲ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﻭﻭﻟﺪﺍ"،
ﺍ ﺒﻴﺢ ﻟﻨﻜﺎ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺋﺮ ﻣﻨﻬ ﱠﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌـﺎﱃ] :ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤـﺼﻨﺎﺕ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻤ ﻣﻨﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﺼﻨﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﻭﺗﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻜﻢ 2،[...ﻓﺒﻘـﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤـﻮﻡ ﻣﺘﻨـﺎﻭﻻ
3
ﻟ ﻣﺎﺀ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﱠﻧﻪ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻣُﻔﺾ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳـﺘﺮﻗﺎ
ﻭﻟ ِﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍ ﺴﻠ ِﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺍ؛ ﻭ ﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﺪ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺪﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻠـﻮ
4
ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺳﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﺭﺍﺋﻊ.
ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺗـﻪ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﺣﺼﻠ ﺍ ﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺮﻳ ﺧﺮ ﻏﲑ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻪ ﻷﻣـﺮﻳﻦ؛
ﺼ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬـﻮﻡ ﺼﱠﺃﻭ ﻤﺎ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺧ ﱠ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺎ ﻳﻐ ﻋﻦ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺗﻪ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﺸﻔﻊ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﻔـﺴﲑﺍ
ﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍ ﻮ ﺄ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﺸﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﺑ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ.
ﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍ ﻦ ﺃﺧﺮ ،ﻛﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺻـﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ُﻳﺸﻐ ُ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎ ﺍﻟ ﺳﺒﻘ ،ﻻﻧﻄﻼ ﻭﺻ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻓﺘﺄ ﱠﻣﻞ!.
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻼ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ]:ﻭﻻ ﺗﻨ ِﻜ ُﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻤُﺸﺮِﻛﺎ ِ ﺣﺘﱠـﻰ ﻳُـ ِﻣ ﱠﻦ ،[...ﺭﻗـﻢ
.5285
2ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺪﺓ.5 :
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(129/5ﺍﻟﻘﺮ :ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ).(58/3
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ 141 ،ﻭ 142ﻭ.184
166
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﱠﻝ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ τﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺗﻜـﻮﻥ
ﲢ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻓﺘﻌﺘ " :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺎ ﺍ ﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺴﱠﻬﺎ " 3،ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
4
ﻛﺎﻧ ﲢ ﺍﳊﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺧﻴﺎﺭ ﺎ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺃ ﻞ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ
ﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺘ ﻨﺎﺳﺎ؛ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﺘ ﺑﻪ ،ﻟﻜﻨﱠﻪ ﺻﺮ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻧﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ " :ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﻠ
ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧ ﲢ ﺍﳊﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺧﻴﺎﺭ ﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣـﺬﻫﺐ
ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﻥ ُﻳﻘﻞ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺎ ﻗﺪﻣﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺎ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﻳﺔ ﻓـﻮ ﺭﺗﺒـﺔ
5
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ،ﻓﺄﻭﺟﺐ ﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍ ﻴﺎﺭ."...
6
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ُﻋﻤﺪﺗﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ " :τﺭﺃﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﺒﺪﺍ؛ ﻳﻌ ﺯﻭﺝ ﺑﺮﻳﺮﺓ"،
ﻭﺭﺟ ﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﻳ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ τﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣ ﱠﺮﺍ 7،ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ" :ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻨـﺎ ﺃﻭﱃ؛ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﺗ ﺮ ﰲ ﺍ ﻴﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺘﺺ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ ﻻ ﺗ ﺮ ﰲ ﺍ ﻴﺎﺭ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻨﺪﻛﻢ؛ ﻓـﺎﻟﺘﻌﻠ
8
ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺮﺓ ﺃﻭﱃ".
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(91/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(441/4ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ) ،(444/4ﺍﺑﻦ
ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ )(591/7
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳﺎ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ) ،(641/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻤﺎﻡ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﺮ ).(402/3
3ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻼ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ ﻴﺎﺭ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .26ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﺴﻌﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ :ﺳﻨﺪﻩ ﺻ ﻴﺢ.
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(287/5ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ).(407/9
5ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(287/5
6ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻼ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺧﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﲢ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ.5280 ،
ﻭﺑﺮﻳﺮﺓ ﺻ ﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺟﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻮﻻﺓ ﺃﻡ ﺍ ﻣﻨﲔ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻛﺎﻧ ﺯﻭﺟﺔ ﻐﻴ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﻭﻓﺎ ﺎ.
ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟ :ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ ) ،(124/4ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻷ ﲑ :ﺃﺳﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺑﺔ ) ،(43/7ﺭﻗﻢ .6770
7ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻼ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻼﻗﺎ. 5279 ،
8ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ126 ،ﻭ ،230ﻭﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) (282/5ﻭﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ).(756/2
167
ﻭﻗ ﱠﻮ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻘﻞ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺒﻮ ﺍ ﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻹﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻜﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺒـﺪ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻬـﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﻮﺩﻳﺔ ،ﻓﻠﻴ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺰﻭﺝ ﺣ ﱠﺮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻏ ﱠﺮﻫﺎ ﺒ ﺎ
1
ﺍ ﻴﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺘﻘ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻌ ﺭﺗﺒﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓ ُ ﱠ ﺎ ﺍ ﻴﺎﺭ.
3
ﺍﳊﺎﺋﻞ 2،ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻔ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﻀﻮﺍ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Ιﻭﺇ ﻛﻦ ﺃﻭﻻﺕ ﻤﻞ ﻓ ﻧﻔﻘﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻦ ﺘ
ﻳﻀﻌﻦ ﻤﻠﻬﻦ [ 4،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ..." :ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺟﺐ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ
5
ﺑﺼﻔﺔ ﻧﻔﻘﺔ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻻ ﲡﺐ ﻧﻔﻘﺔ ﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺻﻔﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺎ ".
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻧﻔ ﺍﻟﻮﻗ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻟﻴـﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻓﺄ ﻞ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻨﻄﻮ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻘﺔ ﻟﻠ ﺎﻣﻞ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﻤﺄﺧـﺬﻩ
ﰲ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻘﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄ :
ﺃ ــ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " : ρﻟﻴ ﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻔﻘﺔ" 6،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻴﻦ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﺍ ﺒﺘﻮﺗﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺋﻞ ﻻ ﻧﻔﻘﺔ
7
ﺎ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) 282/5ﻭ ،(287ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(92/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ).(441/4
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(136/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ) ،(289/9ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ).(253/5
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﺼﺎ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(614/3ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳﺎ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ).(419/3
4ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﻼ .6 :
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ).(262/1
6ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻼ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻘﺔ ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،67ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄـﻼ ،ﺑـﺎﺏ
ﺍ ﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﻼ ﺎ ﻻ ﻧﻔﻘﺔ ﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1480ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﻓﺎ ﻤﺔ ﺑﻨ ﻗﻴ .
7ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) (388/5ﻭﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ.83 ،
168
ﺏ ـ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺒﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻘﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺴﻘ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺸﻮﺯ ،ﻭﺍ ﺒﺘﻮﺗﺔ ﻻ
1
ﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺳﻘﻮ ﻧﻔﻘﺘﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﻣﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ 29 ،ﻭﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ) ،(388/5ﻭﻟﻠﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻨﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ ﻭﺍﻓـ
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺣﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻘﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﺒﺘﻮﺗﺔ
ﺳﻘﻄ ﻧﻔﻘﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﻴ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻭﺑﻘﻴ ﺍﳊﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ .ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ.271 ،
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(71/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(274/4ﺍﻟﻘﺮ :ﺍﳉـﺎﻣﻊ ﻷﺣﻜـﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮ ﻥ
) ،(94/5ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳﺎ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ).(405/3
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ :ﺍ ﻤﻮ ) ،(66/20ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ).(193/9
4ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎﻋﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،17ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺿـﺎ ،ﺑـﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺘ ﺮ ﻤ ﺭﺿﻌﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .1452
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(23/6ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ).(72/3
6ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ.23 :
169
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺣﺪﻳ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺘﲔ:
ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺃ ﺒ ﻗﺮ ﻧﺎ ،ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺷﺎﺫﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺼ ﻴﺢ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴ ﺠﺔ؛ ﻷﻥ
2
ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺜﺒ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﺩ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺒﻮ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﺻ ﱠﺔ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘ ـﺮ
ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍ ﻤ ﻣﻦ ﺮﻳ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ..." :ﻭﻻ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻣـﺎﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻌـﺸﺮﺓ ﻻ
ﺮﻣﻦ ،ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺮﺭﻧﺎ ﺃﻻ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺼـﺼﻨﺎﻩ
3
ﻭﻋﺪﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﻟﺘﻨﺎ".
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﱠﺘﻀﺢ ﺃﻻ ﻧﻜﲑ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻡ ﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻨ
ﺧﺬ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﻪ ﺑﻨﻔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭ ﱠﺩﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮ ﺇ ﺒﺎﺗﻪ ﻧﺴ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻭﺓ ﻣﻊ
4
ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻓﻜﻴ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺘ ﱠ ﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ! .
170
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻟﻜﻨﱠﻪ ﻳﻠﺘﻔ ﺭﺃﺳﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻ ﻢ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ،ﻭﻋﺪﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ؛ ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻠ ؛ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻭﺍﻟـﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺮﺓ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻜﱠﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍ ﻠﻘﺔ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻟ ﺻﻞ ﰲ
3
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻊ ﻛﺎﳊﻤﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻀﺮ ".
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻭﺟﻴﻪ؛ ﺣ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻀﻌ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺿ ﱠﺪ
ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻷﻧﱠﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘ ﻭﻧﻪ ﺣﺠﱠﺔ ،ﻭﻗ ﱠﻮ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ؛ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻬﺮ ﻟـﻦ
ﻳﺘﺒﻊ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻭﺇﻻ ﺗﺒﻊ ،ﺃﻭ ﺗُﻘﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳊﻼﺏ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻗﻴﺴﺔ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣـﻦ
4
ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻬﻢ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ،ﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﺿﻌ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻌﻬﻢ.
ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺳﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﻠﻜﺎ ﻭﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ.
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ :ﻜﻢ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻟ ﻤﺮﺓ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺻﻼ ﻬﺎ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺍﻹﺑﻘﺎﺀ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺍﻟﺼﻼ 5،ﻭﻣﻨﻌﺘﻪ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ
6
ﻭﺍﺷﺘﺮ ﻮﺍ ﻟﻠ ﻜﻢ ﻮﺍﺯﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻟﺼ ﺔ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺪﻳ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ρﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻴﻊ
ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺣ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺻﻼﺣﻬﺎ 1،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺩﻝ ﻨﻄﻮﻗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﳑﺘﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺍﻟـﺼﻼ ،
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺮ ﺍ ﺎﻝ ﻳﺒﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،9ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑـﺎﺏ
ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻼ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺑﺮ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،2204ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻼ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺮ ،ﺭﻗـﻢ ،1543ﻣـﻦ
ﺣﺪﻳ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(246/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(157/5ﺍﻟﻘﺮ :ﺍ ﻔﻬـﻢ ) ،(398/4ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ :ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍ ﻨﲑ ) ،(499/3ﺍ ﻦ :ﺃ ﺮ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ ،186 ،ﺻﺎﱀ :ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ).(612/1
3ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ). (142/6
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ).(157/5
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(205/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ) ،(222/4ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐـ ﺍ ﺘـﺎﺝ )،(40/3
ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﻧﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻭ ﺎﺭ ).(184/5
6ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻤﺎﻡ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﺮ ) ،(288/6ﺍﻟﺰﺣﻴﻠﻲ :ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ ).(487/4
171
ﻭﺩﻝ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻊ ﺑﺈ ﻼ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧـﺎﻟ ﻣﻔﻬـﻮﻡ
2
ﺍﳊﺪﻳ .
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺣ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺻﻼﺣﻬﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،10ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘـﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺻﻼﺣﻬﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،2194ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻤـﺎﺭ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺻﻼﺣﻬﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1534ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(205/3ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﻧﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻭ ﺎﺭ ).(185/5
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(148/6
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(207/3ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳﺎ :ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ) ،(328/4ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍ ﻤـﺎﻡ :ﻓـﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻘـﺪﻳﺮ
) ،(293/6ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ) ،(225/4ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎ :ﻧﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻭ ﺎﺭ ).(184/5
5ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻛﺮﺍﻫﻴﺔ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺮﺓ ﺣ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺻﻼﺣﻬﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 1226ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ:
ﺣﺴﻦ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ،ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺻﻼﺣﻬﺎ ،ﺭﻗﻢ .3368
172
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺒﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺑﻴﺾ ﺃﻱ ﺍﺷﺘ ﱠﺪ ﻭﺃﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻫﺔ ،ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ" :ﻓﻤﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﺇﺑﺎﺣﺔ ﺑﻴﻌـﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑـﺪﺍ
1
ﺻﻼﺣﻪ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻴﺾ ﺳﻨﺒﻠﻪ".
ﻭﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﺢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻨﻌﻪ ،ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﺘﺮﺍ ﻓﻴﻔﻀﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐـﺮﺭ،
2
ﻭ ﻠﻮﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻬﺮ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﻌﲑ ﻭ ﻮﻩ ﻌﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ.
173
ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﰲ ﺍ ﻜﻴﻞ ﻭﺍ ﻮﺯﻭﻥ ﻓﻘ ،ﻭ ﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ 1،ﻭﻋ ﱠﻤﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ
2
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻨﻊ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ،ﻭﺷﺎﺭﻛﻪ ﺃ ﺪ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﺘﺎ ﻌﺎﻣﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺒﻌﻪ ﺣـ
ﻳﺴﺘﻮﻓﻴﻪ " 3،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻟﻮﺍ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﲔ؛ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻔﻬـﻮﻡ ﺻـﻔﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ،ﻭﺑﻪ ﻗﺼﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻄﻌﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺑﻪ ﻗﺼﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣـﺎ
ﺒ ﻟﻪ ﺣ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍ ﻜﻴﻞ ﻭﺍ ﻮﺯﻭﻥ ﻭﺍ ﻌﺪﻭﺩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺎﺯﻭﺍ ﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﺰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻌـﺎﻡ
4
ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﻗﺒﺾ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻨﻔ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺻ ﱠﺮ ﺑﺎﺳـﺘﻨﺎﺩ
ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻗﺼﺮﻫﻢ ﻟﻠ ﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻄﻌﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺍ ﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ
ﺧﻔﻴﻔﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻧﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺣﺘ ﻘﺘﻀﺎﻩ ﺭﺍﻏﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺩﻭﻧﻚ ﻤﻞ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﰲ
ﺍ ﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ " :ﻓﻮﺟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺧﺺ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻓﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ
ﺎﻟ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ....ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻌﻠ ﺑﻪ
ﺍ ﻨﻊ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺧﺎ ﰲ ﺍ ﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﺣ ﻳـﺴﺘﻮﻓﻴﻪ" ،ﻭ
ﻳﻘﻞ ﺣ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻩ ،ﻓﻌﻠ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺎ ﺒ ﻟﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻻﺳـﺘﻴﻔﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ ﺍ ﻜﻴـﻞ
5
ﻭﺍ ﻮﺯﻭﻥ ﻭﺍ ﻌﺪﻭﺩ".
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﲔ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭ ﺘﻤﻞ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘ ﻨﺎﺱ،
ﻭﻳ ﻳﺪﻩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺼﻮ ﻭﺃﻗﻴﺴﺔ؛ ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﺟﻬﻬﺎ ،ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳـﺮ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﺍﻧﺼﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺒ ﻟﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻴﻔﺎﺀ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍ ﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻊ ﻗﺒـﻞ
ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻔﺎﺋﻪ ﺍ ﺴﺒﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﻫﻢ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﻭﺟﺎﻫﺘﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(197/3ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(134/5ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ).(235/4
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ) ،(9/3ﺍﻟﺒﺴﺎﻡ :ﺗﻴﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻡ ).(648/2
3ـ ﺳﺒ ﺮﳚﻪ ﰲ 39ﻫﺎﻣﺶ .2
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(134/5ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(197/3ﺍﻟﺒﺴﺎﻡ :ﺗﻴﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻡ ).(650/2
5ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) 272/6ﻭ.(278
174
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﲢﻔ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻋﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻬـﻢ ﻣﻌـ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣـﻪ ﺃﻭ
1
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻪ.
ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻠ ﻣﻊ ﺩﻗﺘﻪ ﻻ ﳚﺪﻳﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻘﺎﻡ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻗﺪ ﺩﻟﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﺣﺎﺩﻳ
ﺻ ﻴ ﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﻮ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺒﻴﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻋُﺮ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﺑﺄﻣﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟـﻨ
ρ؛ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺯﻳﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺎﺑ ...." :τﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ ρﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗُﺒﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻊ ﺣﻴ ﺗﺒﺘﺎ ﺣ
2
ﻮﺯﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺣﺎ ﻢ".
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Ιﻭﺃ ﻞ ﺍﻟﻠـﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻴـﻊ ﻭ ـﺮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎ[ 3،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ،ﻟﻜﻦ
ﺺ ﻣـﻦ ﻻ ﻣﻠﺘﺠﺄ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍ ﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﺃﺧـ ﱠ
4
ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ.
ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺃﻗﻴﺴﺘﻪ ﻛﻘﻴﺎﺳﻪ ﺑﻴﻊ ﻏﲑ ﺍ ﻄﻌﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﻫﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴﻊ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻴﺎﻥ
ﰲ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺑﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻓﻼ ﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻝ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻓﺎﺳﺪﺓ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻬـﺎ
5
ﻣﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻻ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ.
ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻓﺄﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺿﻌ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺃﻗﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ،
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺷﻴ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﺑﺬﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ.
ﺃﺿ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﺎ ﱠﻣﺔ ،ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﻗﺼﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻄﻌﻮﻡ ﺧﺎ ،
ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻻ ﺼﺼﻪ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮ ﺍ ﺼﺺ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻴﺎ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ
ﻻ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺘ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﻟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ؛ ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺑﺎ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ ﻻ
6
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ.
175
ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺻﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺘﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﰲ
ﻛﻞ ﻣﺒﻴﻊ.
176
ﻏﻨﻴﺎ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ،ﻭ ﻳﺼﻔﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ] :ﻭﺇ ﻛﺎ ﺫﻭ ﻋﺴﺮﺓ ﻓﻨ ﺮﺓ ﺇﻟـ
ﻣﻴﺴﺮﺓ [." 1،
2
ﻭﻣﻌ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺻ ﺑﺎﻟ ﻠﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﻳﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻏﻨﻴﺎ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ،ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍ ﻌﺴﺮ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻞ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﻧـﺺ
ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﻟ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻨﻄﻮﻗﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺇﻧ ﺎﺭ ﺍ ﻌﺴﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻄـﻞ
ﺍ ﻌﺴﺮ ﻟﻴ ﻠﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺇﻧ ﺎﺭﻩ ﺇﻋﺎﻧﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻌﺼﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻄﻞ ﺍﻟـﻼﺯﻡ ﺗﻌـ ﱠﺪ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻣﻪ.
177
ﻓﻠﻮ ﺒ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ِﻴﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎ ِﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣُﺘـﺼﻮﱠﺭ
ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺮﻳﺮ ،ﻳﻜﻦ ﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍ ﺍ ﻼﺀﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌ ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺣـ ﱠ ﺍ ـﺎﻝ ﻻ
ﻳﻔﻮ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻠﻲﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻩ.
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻼ ﺎﻝ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻬﺠﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻳﻮﺍﻓ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ،ﻣـﻊ
ُﻣ ﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻠﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺄ ِﺣﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻔﻠ ،
ُﺣ ﱠ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻏ ﱠﺮﻩ ،ﻻ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺩﺍ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟـﺼﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤـﺎ
ﻻ ﺮﺍﻡ ﺷﺮ ﺍ ﻼﺀﺓ ﰲ ﺍ ﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻷﻥ ﺍﻹﻓﻼﺱ ﻋﻴﺐ ﻳُﻌﻄﻲ ﻟﻠ ُﻤ ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺟـﻮ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍ ِﻴﻞ ﻛﺴﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻮﺏ 1،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻤﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺳﻠﻴﻢ.
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻌﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ :ﻫﻞ ﻳﻀﻤﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﺘﻪ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﺎﺭﺍ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ
ﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻓﺴﺪﺗﻪ ﺍ ﻮﺍﺷﻲ ،ﻓﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻟـﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟـﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻻ
3
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻴﻞ 2،ﻭﻗﻀﻰ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﻼ ﻭ ﺎﺭﺍ.
ﻭﳑﱠﺎ ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﺑﻪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﻭﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﻭﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎ ﺇﺫ ﻳﺤﻜﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺮ ﺇﺫ ﻧﻔﺸ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﻭﻛﻨﺎ ﻟﺤﻜﻤﻬﻢ ﺷـﺎﻫﺪﻳﻦ [4،ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﻔﺶ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ
ﺇﻻ ﻟﻴﻼ ،ﻓﺪﻝ ﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺴﺪﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺏ ﺎﺭﺍ ﻫﺪﺭ ﻻ ﻳﻀﻤﻦ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﱠﻧﻨـﺎ
ﺎ ﺒﻮﻥ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻨﺎ ،ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴـﻪ ﻣـﺰﺍﺭ
5
ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺭ .
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
178
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻀﻤﲔ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺏ ﺍ ﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺴﺪﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﱠﻨﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺗـﻪ
ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺪﻳ " ﻧﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺍﺀ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺯﺏ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﺎ ﺩﺧﻠ ﺣﺎﺋ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻓﺄﻓﺴﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻘﻀﻰ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﺍﷲ ρﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺋ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ﺣﻔ ﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺴﺪﺗﻪ ﺍ ﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻴـﻞ ﺿـﺎﻣﻦ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺃﻫﻠﻬﺎ" 1،ﻭﻣﻌ ﺿﺎﻣﻦ ﺃﻱ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ،ﻓﺪﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺼﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ﻓﻘ .
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍ ﻌ ﺃﻥ ﺇ ﺎ ﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﻱ؛ ﻷﱠﻧﻪ ﻟﻴ ﺑﻮﻗ ﺭﻋﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﺎﺩ،
2
ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻓﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺑﺔ.
ﺃ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﲔ؛ ﺍﻷﻭﱠﻝ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑ ﻭﻻ
3
ﺠﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻧﻠ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺼﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻨﺎ ،ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ. ﺣﱠ
ﺺ ﻛﻼﻣـﻪ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺻ ﱠﺢ؛ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻭﻟﻴ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺠﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻟﻴﻚ ﻧ ﱠ
ﺣﻴ ﻗﺎﻝ..." :ﻷﻧﱠﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍ ﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟ ﻧﻔﺸ ،
ﻳﻜﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻟﻴ ﻋﻨـﺪﻱ
4
ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺻ ﻴﺢ."...
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻼﺣ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻌﻤﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍ ﺪﻳﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣـﻦ ﺃﺩﻟـﺔ ﻣﺎﻟـﻚ ﰲ
ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ 5،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺘ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﱠﻨﻘﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻴﻞ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﺎﻡ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺠﺎﻡ.
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻗﻀﻴﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻳﺴﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،37ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴـﻮ ،
ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍ ﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﺪ ﺯﺭ ﻗﻮﻡ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 3569ﻭ ،3570ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ.
ﺺ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﺣﺪﻳ " :ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻤﺎﺀ ﺟﺒﺎﺭ" 2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ) ،(444/7ﻭ ﺬﺍ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ،ﻓ ﱠ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴ ﲔ ﺪﻳ ﻧﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺍﺀ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ).(1268/3
3ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ) ،(401/1ﻭﺩﻭﻧﻚ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭ ﺍ ﺮﺟﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ،ﺍﻧ ﺮ،(283/1) :
) 134/7) ،(544/5) ،(213/4ﻭ.(376/9) ،(449/8) ،(152
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(443/7
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻓﻠﻤﺒﺎﻥ :ﺧ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺎﻟ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍ ﺪﻳﻨﺔ.302 ،
179
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺒﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﻘﻮﻻ ،ﻭﻗﺼﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻘـﺎﺭ
ﻓﻘ 1،ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺓ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺪﻳ ﺟﺎﺑﺮ " :τﺃﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ρﻗﻀﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ
2
ﻳﻘﺴﻢ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻭﻗﻌ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﻓﻼ ﺷﻔﻌﺔ".
ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ" :ﻓﻜﺄﱠﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻜﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻡ ﻳﻘﺴﻢ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺃ ﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﻘﻬـﺎﺀ
3
ﺍﻷﻣﺼﺎﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺻ ﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﻪ".
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻮ ﻦ ﻞ ﻧ ﺮ ،ﻷﻥ ﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻟ ﻭﺍﻟﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳ ﺍﳉﻨ ،ﻓﻜﺄﱠﻧﻪ ρ
4
ﺣﺼﺮ ﺟﻨ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺴﻢ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑﺘﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ
ﺑﻨﻔ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻬﻢ ،ﻣﻊ ﺇﻗﺮﺍﺭﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ 5،ﻭ ﻜﻦ ﺍﻗﺘـﻀﺎﺏ
ﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺄ :
ﺃ ـ ﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺩﻝ ﺑﺸﻄﺮﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﻠ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ﺎ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﻗﺴﻤﺘﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ ،ﻭﺑﺸﻄﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻭﺩ؛ ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺒﻮ
،214 1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(49/4ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(280/7ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﺰﻱ :ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ،
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ :ﺍ ﻐ ) ،(436/5ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ) ،(355/3ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ :ﺭﺩ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺭ ).(262/9
2ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ 1ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮ ﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻮ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺴﻢ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،2214ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺴﺎﻗﺎﺓ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،1608ﻛﻼ ـﺎ
ﻋﻦ ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ.
3ـ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ :ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍ ﺘﻬﺪ ) ،(50/4ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻏﲑﻩ؛ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ :ﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍ ) ، (632/2ﺍ ـﺎﺯﺭﻱ:
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،337 ،ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ :ﺍﻟﺬﺧﲑﺓ ) ،(280/7ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﺴﺎ :ﻣﻔﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ.476 ،
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﳉﻮﻳ :ﺍﻟ ﻫﺎﻥ ) ،(180/1ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍ ﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ،271 ،ﻝ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ :ﺍ ﺴﻮﺩﺓ ) ،(702/2ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ:
ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺮ ،243 ،ﺍﳉﺼﺎ :ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ).(180/1
5ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﻬﺎﺝ. 148 ،
180
ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺮﺓ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻨﻘﻮﻝ 1،ﻭ ﺴﺐ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺻ ؛ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ
ِﻋﻠﻴﺘِﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﺻﻔﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﺻﺎ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ
ﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﺘﻪ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺿﻌﻔﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻣ ﱠﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ
ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺑﻴﻨ ﺔ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻌ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ،ﺯﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺻ ﱠﺮ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ
ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﺻﻔﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﺻﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺗﻌﻠﻴ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺰﺀ ﻋﻠﺔ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋـﻦ
2
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ.
ﺑﺈﺯﺍﻟﺔ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺏ ـ ﻟﻴ ﺍ ﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺯﺍﻟﺔ ﻣﻄﻠ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺭ ،ﻭﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺼﻮ
3
ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺃﻫﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ ،ﻻﺳﺘﻠﺰﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﺧﺒﲑﺍ ﺑﺸ ﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻪ ،ﻓﻤﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻟﻴ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻱ ،ﻭﻻ ُﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻓـﻲ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻘﺎﻡ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ" :ﺇﱠﻧﻤﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨ ρﺍﻟﺸﻔﻌﺔ "...؛ 4ﻷﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﺓ ﻟﻠ ـﺼﺮ
ﻣﻨﻄﻮﻗﺎ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﻟﺮﺃﻳﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻗ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ.
181
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﺩﻟﺔ؛ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻ ﻢ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ...] :Υﺍﻟﺤﺮ
ﺑﺎﻟﺤﺮ[...؛ 1ﻭﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺩﻝ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺣﺼﺮ ﺍ ﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﰲ ﺧ ﻩ ،ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊ ﱠﺮ ﻻ ُﻳﻘﺘـﻞ
2
ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺒﺪ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ؛ ﻭﻭﺍﻓﻘﻬﻢ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻟﻴـﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺃﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺣﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﰲ ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻣﻪ،
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ..." :ﻭﺗﻌﻠ ﰲ ﺇ ﺒﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺑﻮﺟﻬﲔ؛ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻷﻟ
ﻭﺍﻟﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻭ ﺍﳊﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ
3
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ."...
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﺎ ﻳﻐ ﻋﻦ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ،ﺃﻣﱠـﺎ ﻣـﺎ
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺪﻭﻧﻚ ُﻣﻠ ﺼﱠﻪ:
ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﻭﻋﺒﺪ ﻏـﲑﻩ، ﺃ ــ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺈ ﺎ ﺍﻟﺼ ﺎﺑﺔ ψﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺒﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎ
ﺣﻴ ﻧُﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭ ﻳﻌﺮ ﻢ ﺎﻟ ﻓﺜﺒ ﺇ ﺎﻋﺎ.
4
ﻗﻠ :ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺜﺒ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ.
ﺏ ــ ﺍﺣﺘ ﱠ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻲ " :τﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺣﺮ ﺑﻌﺒﺪ" 5،ﻭﺍ ﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﱠﻨﺔ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ؛
6
ﻫﻲ ُﺳﱠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻨ .ρ
ﺝ ـ ﻗﺎﺱ ﺳﻘﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻘﻮ ﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺘﻠﻪ ﺳﻴﺪﻩ؛ ﻷﻧـﻪ ﺃﺣـﺪ ﺑـﺪﱄ
7
ﺍﻟﻨﻔ .
182
ﺇﺫﻥ ،ﻓﻤﻮﻗ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ﻣﺴﻠﻜﺎ ﻭﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ.
ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻭ :ﻫﻞ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻤﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻳﺘﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺟﺮ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺴ ﻟﺔ
ﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻹﻗﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻤﺔ ،ﻓﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﺃ ﺪ ﻋـﺪﻡ
ﺍﻹﻗﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺧﺎﻟ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻌ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻴ ﻭ ﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫـﻞ
1
ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ.
1ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮ :ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮ ﻥ ) ،(181/6ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﻴ :ﻣﻐ ﺍ ﺘﺎﺝ ) ،(333/5ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠـﺢ :ﺍﻟﻔـﺮﻭ
) ،(14/10ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﻄﺎﻝ :ﺷﺮ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ) ،(527/8ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ).(229/12
2ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍ ﺎﺋﺪﺓ.45 :
3ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(122/9
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(122/9
5ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻌﻠﻘﺎ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻫﻞ ﻳﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﺃﻡ ﻳﻘﺘﺺ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ،ﺭﻗﻢ
،6896ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺃ ﺷﻴﺒﺔ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻻ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻤﺔ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،28996ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ.
183
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﺒ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺎ ﺑﺎﻹ ﺎ .
4
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﳊﺒ .
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ] :Υﻭﻳﺪﺭﺃ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺬﺍﺏ ﺃ ﺗﺸﻬﺪ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻪ
ﺇﻧﻪ ﻟﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺫﺑ [ 5،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﻟ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻼﻋﻨﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻜﻠ ﻋﻦ ﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﻌـﺎﻥ
ﺗﻮﺟﺐ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﺪ.
ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻓ ﺎﻟﻔﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺎﻋﺪ ﻢ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍ ﺼﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ؛ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﻘـﻞ
ﺍﳉﺼﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺃ ﻳﻮﺳ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ..." :ﺇﻧﱠﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﱠﻨﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺬﺍﺏ ﻋﻨـﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
6
ﺷﻬﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻴ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱠﻧﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻬﺪ ﻻ ُﻳﺪﺭﺃ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺬﺍﺏ".
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻨﻔ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻬﻢ؛ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ..." :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ
ﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻠﻌﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﺭﺃﻩ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻌﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻠﻨﺎ
184
ﺮﺝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺫ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺬﻓﻪ ،ﻓﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻘﺬﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳊـﺪ ﺃﺻـﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍ ﻌ ،ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻣﻌ
1
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﱠﻨﺔ".
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺰﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺫﻫﺎﻧﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻦ ﻧﻘﺮﺃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﺳـﻴﻘ ﻣـﺴﺎ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﻣﺸﺮﻭ ﻪ ﻣﺘﻔ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻠـ ﰲ
ﺳﺒﻴﻠﻪ.
ﺻﺔ ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﻮﺍﻓ ﺍﳉﻤﻬـﻮﺭ ﻓﺎﻟ ﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺘ ﻘﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻌﺬﺍﺏ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻜﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺧﺎ ﱠ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍ ﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺬﺍﺏ ﰲ ﺍ ﻳﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺪ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﺳﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻼﻋﻨﺔ ﺗﻮ ﱠﺟﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺎ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﺭﺃﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﻤﲔ.
ﻭﺃﱠﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍ ﻌ ،ﻓﻘﺎﺱ ﺍ ﻘﺬﻭ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻜﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺫ ﰲ ﺍﺳـﺘ ﻘﺎ ﺍﳊـﺪ،
ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﱠﻨﺔ؛ ﻭﺃﺭﺍﻩ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ " :ρﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺪ ﰲ ﻬﺮﻙ".
2
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺰﻭﺝ ﺩﺭﺀ ﺍﳊﺪ ﻋﻨﻪ؛ ﻭﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻓﺪﻝ
3
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺔ.
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ،ﻭﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ.
185
2
ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺯﻩ. ﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻼ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﻝ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺗﻘﻮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻧ ﺮﻳﺎ
ﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﻓﻴﺎ ﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ..." :ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﻼ ﻟﻴﺎﻝ ﻓﻤﻦ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﺍﻗﺘﻀﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺇﺑﺎﺣﺔ ﺍ ﺠﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻌﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺣﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ،ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺼﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺒﺎ ،ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻠﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ
ﺺ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺴﲑ ﺍ ﻬﺎﺟﺮﺓ ﻭﻗ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ،ﻭ ﺘﻤﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼ ﻧـ ﱠ
3
ﻣﻨﻌﻪ ،ﻭﻧﻔ ُﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻳُﻄﻠﺐ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ".
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﳉﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺘ ﻬﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻮﺍﺯ ﺍ ﺠﺮ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻼ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﰲ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻤﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻭﺟﻬﲔ:
ﺃ ـ ﺃﻥ ﻤﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ρﻗﺼﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺼﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻼ ﰲ
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍ ﺒﺎ ،ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻠﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺴﲑ ﺍ ﻬﺎﺟﺮﺓ ﻭﻗ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ.
ﺏ ـ ﺃﻥ ُﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ .
ﻭﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻡ ﺑﺄﺻﻠﻪ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺿﻌ ،
ﻭﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍ ﻨﻊ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ
4
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﲔ ﻟﻠﻤﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺃﻧﱠﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻨﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻼ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍ ﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻟﻜﻨﱠﻪ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺣﺔ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺍ ﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺻﻠﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ ،ﺗـﺒﲔ ﻟﻨـﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺻ ﱠﺮ ﺑﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺎ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻭﺣﻜﻢ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻧﱠﻪ ﺃ ﻞ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ
ﰲ ﺍ ﻨﺘﲔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺻ ﱠﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻜﻮﻥ ﺍ ﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.
1ـ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍ ﻬﺎﺟﺮﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،13ﻭﺍﻟﺒ ﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍ ﺠـﺮﺓ،
ﺭﻗﻢ ،6077ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ﻭﺍ ﺩﺍﺏ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﲢﺮ ﺍ ﺠﺮﺓ ﻓﻮ ﻼ ﺑﻼ ﻋﺬﺭ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،2560
ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺃ ﺃﻳﻮﺏ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ.
2ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ :ﺷﺮ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ) ،(112/16ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ).(492/10
3ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ :ﺍ ﻨﺘﻘﻰ ).(293/9
4ـ ﺍﻧ ﺮ :ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ :ﺷﺮ ﺻ ﻴﺢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ).(112/16
186
ﺠﻠﻨﺎ
ﻭﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻭﺳﻜ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺳﺘ ﻨﺎﺳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﻭﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳـ ﱠ
ﺠﻞ ﺇ ﺎﻟﻪ ﻟ ﺩﻟﺔ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ ،ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭ ُﻳﺴ ﱠ
ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺯﻛﺎﺓ ﺍ ﺎﺷﻴﺔ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﳊ ﻨﺎ ﺗﺬﺑﺬﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﻭﺗﺒﻴﱠﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺿـﻮ
ﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﺃﻱ ﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺗﻪ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻗﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎ ﺍ ﺘﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﰲ ﺍ ﺬﻫﺐ ﻓﻘ .
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﻓﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻧﱠـﻪ
ﺸﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬـﺎ ﰲ ﻣـﺼﻨﱠﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﻳُـ ِ ﻳﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍ ﻬﻤﱠﺔ ﺍﻟ
ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﻄﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳ ﻬﺮ ﻼﺀ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﻭﻏﺰﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻘﻬﻪ ،ﺘﻬﺪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻭﻟﻴ
ﺠﺘﻬﺪ ﻣﻄﻠ ،ﻭﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘ ﻘﻴ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﱄ ،ﻭﺩﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺮﺟﱠﺢ
ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺣ ﺃﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﻪ ﺑﻴ ﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟ ﺍﻟ ﺗﻀﻴ ﺫﺭﻋﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺎﻟ .
187
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻠﺨ
ﻳﻌﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍ ﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍ ﻬﻤﺔ ،ﺍﻟ ﺗﺮﺗﺒ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ.
ﻠﺔ ﻧﻘﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ؛ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴ ـﺬﻩ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ؛ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﺻﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗ ﺃ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ
ﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﺻ ﺎﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺮﺗﺒ ﻋﻨـﻪ ـﺎﺭ ﺎﻟ
ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ.
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣ ُﻋﻨِـﻲ ﺑﺘﺘﺒﻊ ﺍ ﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺍ ﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣـﻦ ﺧـﻼﻝ
ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻐ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﻣﺜﺎﻻ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺗﻀﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼ ﺎ ﺃﻧﱠﻪ ـﺎﻟ
ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﺼﻮﺭ؛ ﻭﺃﱠﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﺧﺮ ؛ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴ .
241