VIVA-Tech International Journal for Research and Innovation Volume 1, Issue 5 (2022)

ISSN(Online): 2581-7280
VIVA Institute of Technology
10th National Conference on Role of Engineers in Nation Building – 2022 (NCRENB-2022)

Wireless Sensor
Mukeshkumar Mishra1, Anojkumar Yadav2
1
(electrical department , viva institute of technology,india )
2
(electrical department , viva institute of technology,india)

Abstract : These are kindred to wi-fi ad HOC networks inside the sense that they depend on wireless
connectivity and spontaneous formation of networks so that sensor information can be conveyed wirelessly.
WSNs monitor physicals or atmospheical conditions, such as temperatures, sound, and pressure. Modern networks
are bi-directional, both amassing data and enabling control of sensor activitys. The developments of these
networks was incentiviizeda by military applications such as battlefield surveillance. Such networks are utilizing
in industrial and consumer application, such as industrial process monitoring and controling and machine health
monitored.
Keywords – temeratuer , pressure, wireless , motivated, health monitoring.

I. INTRODUCTION
Perspicacious grid can provide efficient, reliable, and safe energy automation accommodation with two-way
communication and electricity flows. Through wireless sensor network, it can capture and analyze data cognate
to power utilization, distribution, and generation efficiently. According to the analysis results, astute grid can
provide predictive power information (e.g., meter reading data, monthly charge, and power utilization
recommendation) to both utilities and consumers. It can additionally diagnose power perturbances and outages to
evade the effect of equipments failure and natural accidents. wi-fi senor community is followed by way of
application corporations and suppliers for substation automation management, and it's far withal broadly carried
out in wireless automatic meter studying (WAMR) device. Predicated on wi-fi sensor network, strength utilization
and control facts, consisting of the energy usage frequency, segment angle and the values of voltage, may be study
proper time from remote contrivances. consequently, software organizations can manipulate energy call for
efficaciously. They can truncate operational costs by eliminating the desideratum for human readers and provide
an automatic pricing system for customers. Customers can relish highly reliable, flexible, yarely accessible and
cost-efficacious.

Fig.1.1 type of sensor

Types of Wireless Sensor Networks

1
www.viva-technology.org/New/IJRI
VIVA-Tech International Journal for Research and Innovation Volume 1, Issue 5 (2022)
ISSN(Online): 2581-7280
VIVA Institute of Technology
10th National Conference on Role of Engineers in Nation Building – 2022 (NCRENB-2022)

Depending on the environment, the types of networks are decided so that those can be deployed underwater,
underground, on land, and so on. Different types of WSNs include:
1. Terrestrial WSNs
2. Underground WSNs
3. Underwater WSNs
4. Multimedia WSNs
5. Mobile WSNs

Terrestrial WSNs
Terrestrial WSNs are capable of speaking base stations effectively, and include hundreds to heaps of wi-fi sensor
nodes deployed either in an unstructured (advert hoc) or dependent (Pre-orchestrated) way. In an unstructured
mode, the sensor nodes are desultorily disbursed in the target place this is dropped from a nice-tuned aircraft. The
preplanned or established mode considers most reliable placement, grid placement, and 2nd, 3-d placement
fashions. in this WSN, the battery power is circumscribed; but, the battery is prepared with sun cells as a secondary
energy supply. The power conservation of these WSNs is executed with the aid of using low responsibility cycle
operations, minimizing delays, and most beneficial routing, and so forth.

Underground WSNs

The underground wi-fi sensor networks are greater extravagant than the terrestrial WSNs in phrases of
deployment, preservation, and system value issues and meticulous orchestrating. The WSNs networks encompass
several sensor nodes which might be obnubilated inside the ground to screen underground situations. To relay
statistics from the sensor nodes to the bottom station, supplemental sink nodes are placed above the ground. The
underground wireless sensor networks deployed into the ground are arduous to recharge. The sensor battery nodes
geared up with circumscribed battery electricity are onerous to recharge. In integration to this, the underground
surroundings makes wi-fi communication a challenge due to the excessive quality of attenuation and sign loss.

Under Water WSNs

More than 70% of the earth is occupied with dihydrogen monoxide. These networks consist of several sensor
nodes and conveyances deployed submerged. Autonomous submersed conveyances are utilized for amassing data
from these sensor nodes. A challenge of submersed communication is a long propagation delay, and bandwidth
and sensor failures. Submersed, WSNs are equipped with a constrained battery that cannot be recharged or
superseded. The issue of energy conservation for submersed WSNs involves the development of submersed
communication and networking techniques.

Multimedia WSNs

Multimedia wi-fi sensor networks had been proposed to allow monitoring and tracking of activities within the
shape of multimedia, inclusive of imaging, video, and audio. these networks include low-cost sensor nodes geared
up with microphones and cameras. these nodes are interconnected with every other over a wi-fi connection for
information compression, facts retrieval, and correlation. he challenges with the multimedia WSN include high
power intake, excessive bandwidth specifications, information processing, and compressing strategies. In
integration to this, multimedia contents require excessive bandwidth for the content to be disbursed congruously
and facilely.

Mobile WSNs

These networks include an amassment of sensor nodes that can be moved on their personal and can be interacted
with the physical surroundings. The cell nodes can compute experience and speak. cell wi-fi sensor networks are
tons greater multifarious than static sensor networks. The advantages of MWSN over static wi-fi sensor networks

2
www.viva-technology.org/New/IJRI
VIVA-Tech International Journal for Research and Innovation Volume 1, Issue 5 (2022)
ISSN(Online): 2581-7280
VIVA Institute of Technology
10th National Conference on Role of Engineers in Nation Building – 2022 (NCRENB-2022)

include better and ameliorated coverage, higher energy performance, superior channel potential, and so on.

Fig.1.2 multimedia underground sensor

II. CONCLUSION
The variety of packages of perspicacious grid over wi-fi sensor networks has been steadily incrementing, which
includes wi-fi computerized meter analyzing (WAMR) and remote monitoring systems. however, since radio
waves in wi-fi verbal exchange unfold in the air, one mundane risk is that wi-fi channels are more insecure and
prone to severa attacks than stressed networks . tons subsisting work has endeavored to contain protection into
perspicacious grid. To higher apprehend securing accommodation for perspicacious grid over wireless networks,
we've presented kenned attacks which could disrupt wireless sensor community in keenly intellective grid
conversation predicated on CERT taxonomy. we've discussed the current trends of wi-fi sensor networks and
illustrated fundamental security requisites to shield keenly intellective grid towards those assailments. we've got
moreover stated numerous subsisting solutions to wi-fi sensor community security in keenly intellective grid.

REFERENCES
Journal Papers:
[1] A. R. Metke and R. L. Ekl, “Security technology for smart grid networks,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp.
99–107, 2010.
[2] P. Sakarindr and N. Ansari, “Security services in group communications over wireless infrastructure mobile ad hoc, and
wireless sensor networks,” IEEEWireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 8–20, 2007.
[3] D.Wei, Y. Lu, M. Jafari, P.M. Skare, and K. Rohde, “Protecting smart grid automation systems against cyberattacks,” IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 782–795, 2011.
[4] S. S. S. R. Depuru, L. Wang, and V. Devabhaktuni, “Smart meters for power grid: challenges, issues, advantages and
status,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2736–2742, 2011.
[5] U.S. NIST, “NIST framework and roadmap for smart grid interoperability standards, release 1. 0,” NIST Special Publication
1108, 2010, http://www.nist.gov/public affairs/releases/ upload/smartgrid interoperability final.pdf.
[6] A draft version of this publication by NIST, http://www.nist .gov/public affairs/releases/upload/smartgrid 092409 fr.pdf.
[7] G. Kalogridis, C. Efthymiou, S.Z. Denic, T. A. Lewis, and R. Cepeda, “Privacy for smart meters: towards undetectable
appliance load signatures,” in Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, pp. 232– 237,
Gaithersburg, Md, USA, October 2010.
[8] J. D. Howard and T. A. Longstaff, “A common language for computer security incidents,” Sandia National Laboratories,
Sandia Representative, SAND98-8867, 1998.
[9] B. A. Akyol, H. Kirkham, S. L. Clements, and M. D. Hadley, “A survey of wireless communications for the electric power
system,” U.S. Department of Energy, 2010.
[10] V. C. Gungor, B. Lu, and G. P. Hancke, “Opportunities and challenges of wireless sensor networks in smart grid,” IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 3557– 3564, 2010.
[11] V. C. Gungor and F. C. Lambert, “A survey on communication networks for electric systemautomation,” Computer Networks,
vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 877–897, 2006.
[12] G. N. Ericsson, “Cyber security and power system communication— essential parts of a smart grid infrastructure,” IEEE
[13] EL- PRO-CUS “Wireless Sensor Networks : Types & Their Applications”

3
www.viva-technology.org/New/IJRI