You are on page 1of 1

JADA+ CONTENT

This review does not in any way substitute for professional advice and should not be regarded as clinical guidance. As always,
any evidence should be carefully considered by clinician and patient to ensure that in their views, all potentially desirable
consequences outweigh all potentially undesirable consequences.

JADA+ CLINICAL SCANS Strengths and limitations. This RCT had an overall

low risk of bias. The allocation of participants to the
group was done appropriately; participants, health care
Romina Brignardello-Petersen, DDS, MSc, PhD personnel, and data analysts were blinded, and few
participants were lost to follow-up. Therefore, the groups
ACETAMINOPHEN PLUS CAFFEINE OR PLUS were likely to have been balanced with regard to factors
CODEINE PROBABLY RESULTS IN LESS that could have affected pain and swelling at the begin-
PAIN BUT MORE SWELLING IN PATIENTS ning of, during, and after the completion of the trial. One
UNDERGOING PLACEMENT OF A SINGLE strength of this study was that the researchers used a
IMPLANT WITHOUT BONE GRAFTING IN THE visual analog scale to measure swelling, which increases
POSTERIOR ZONE the applicability of the results. The researchers in this
Samieirad S, Afrasiabi H, Tohidi E, et al. Evaluation of RCT found that participants who received ACO had less
caffeine versus codeine for pain and swelling man- pain but more swelling than those who received ACA
agement after implant surgeries: a triple blind clinical the first days after surgery. The magnitude of the dif-
trial [published online ahead of print July 5, 2017]. ferences between ACA and ACO for both outcomes was
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/ likely to be important to patients. Nevertheless, pain
j.jcms.2017.06.014. severity was moderate, whereas swelling was unlikely to
interfere with function, and thus the reduction in pain
Key words. Implantology; caffeine; codeine; post- may be more important than the increase in swelling for
operative complications; randomized clinical trial. many patients. In addition, each participant received 1
Clinical relevance. Because nonsteroidal anti- implant per surgery and did not need a bone graft pro-
inflammatory drugs may interfere with osseointegration cedure; therefore, the results are more likely to apply
after implant surgery, some clinicians prefer to prescribe to patients with these characteristics. Finally, clinicians
other drugs such as acetaminophen with caffeine or must bear in mind that codeine may not be an acceptable
codeine as adjuncts. The choice between these drugs, option for many stakeholders, so the decision regarding
however, must be supported by evidence of their effec- which drug to prescribe should be shared with the
tiveness in minimizing postoperative complications. patients. n
Study summary. The researchers conducted a ran- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.09.043
domized clinical trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness Copyright ª 2017 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.
of acetaminophen plus caffeine (ACA) with acetamino-
Address correspondence to Dr. Brignardello-Petersen at e-mail
phen plus codeine (ACO) in minimizing pain and rominabp@gmail.com.
swelling after implant surgery. They enrolled 80 partic-
Disclosure. Dr. Brignardello-Petersen did not report any disclosures.
ipants* who were receiving a single implant in the
posterior mandibular zone without the need for a bone
graft and assigned them to receive perioperative antibi- * 50% female; mean (standard deviation) age, 41 (5) years.
y Acetaminophen, 300 milligrams, plus 20 mg anhydrous caffeine (ACA);
otics as well as either postoperative ACAy or ACO.z In all 10 tablets total.
participants, pain severity increased after 30 minutes, z Acetaminophen, 300 mg, plus 20 mg codeine; 10 tablets total.
reaching its peak at 6 hours after surgery. It then § The researchers measured pain by having participants use a visual
decreased to nearly 0 after 1 week. Participants who analog scale ranging from 0 to 10, in which higher scores represented worse
pain.
received ACO had pain scores§ 1.61, 1.67, and 1.95 points { Mean difference (95% confidence interval), 1.61 (1.29 to 2.21), 1.67 (1.35 to
lower{ on average than participants who received ACA 2.29) and 1.95 (1.64 to 3.97) at 3, 6, and 12 hours after surgery, respectively.
at 3, 6, and 12 hours after surgery, respectively. There Average pain score in ACA group 4.00, 4.39, and 3.22 at 3, 6, and 12 hours,
respectively.
were no statistical differences in average pain scores # The researchers measured swelling by having participants use a visual
between the groups 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, and 7 days analog scale ranging from 0 to 5, in which higher scores represented worse
after surgery. Participants who received ACO had swelling.
** Mean difference (95% confidence interval), 0.28 (0.11 to 0.55), 1 (0.85
swelling scores# of 0.28, 1.00, and 0.72 points higher** on to 1.49), and 0.72 (0.54 to 1.04) at 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery. Average
average than participants who received ACA at 1, 2, and swelling score in the ACA group, 1.11, 1.89, and 1.78 at 1, 2, and 3 days,
3 days after surgery, respectively. respectively.

JADA ( )
- - http://jada.ada.org - 2017 e1

You might also like