Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S a k a i I
REFERENCE: Sakai, H., "Friction and Wear of Tire Tread Rubber," Tire Science
and Technology, TSTCA, Vol. 24, No. 3, July-September, 1996, pp. 252-275.
ABSTRACT: Using a fiat-belt tire test machine, this study investigated causal factors in
the wear of tire tread. To ensure the success of the experiment, the accuracy of the testing
device was improved and the trial conditions were kept under close control. As a measure
against sticky particles of worn rubber clinging to the surfaces of the safety-walk and
tires, a uniform amount of mica powder was electrostatically coated onto the tire tread
surfaces. Surface whiteness was measured and controlled automatically to maintain a
constant level. The amount of wear was calculated by weighing the tire on a precision
six-order electrical balance sensitive down to 0.1 g. Consequently, in a relatively short
time it was possible to ascertain measurable rates of wear, and the effects of main factors
on the wear rate (the weight reduction per unit distance travelled) of car tires, the linear
wear rate (the weight reduction per unit distance slid), the energetic wear rate (the weight
reduction per unit energy lost), and friction coefficient were evident.
252
SAKAI ON THE FRICTION AND WEAR OF TREAD RUBBER 253
Co,lec l
th
r
Coating Nozzle
( @ I 11uminometer
the slip angle, lateral force, load, internal pressure, velocity, temperature,
number of ribs, and the type of tire affect the wear rate when the slip angle
is small is given. Then, the changes in friction coefficient, the linear wear
rate, and the energetic wear rate according to velocity, temperature, and
pressure when the sliding velocity is large are described.
The control, in the past, was a proportional control by the location of the end
of the belt. However, this control method lacks sufficient control accuracy. A
differential control circuit was added to the proportional control circuit, which
enabled the wandering to be brought within a satisfactory range.
FIG. 3 - - Electrostatic coating nozzle a n d detectors area around the test tire.
taken after drying the tire by using a vacuum drier when the humidity was
high. Rubber gloves were used to handle the tires to achieve accurate measure-
ments. Figure 5 shows the vacuum drier for the tire and the electronic precision
balance used in this experiment.
FIG. 5 -- Vacuum type tire dryer and high-accuracy six-order electrical balance, sensitive down
t o O . l g.
0.1
25% - -
40%-
300 km q
150 km
~D
3 Month
} I
9 SAT
.-1
10 - 1.0 rL)
LF
//Io o.a
I
1.0
S l i p Angle (deg)
FIG. 7 -- Relation between lateral force, self-aligning torque, and wear rate.
force at the rear end of the contact area affects the self-aligning torque more
than the lateral force. This fact indicates that the point at which the wear rate
is the smallest exists closer to the point where the self-aligning torque is zero
than the point where the lateral force is zero.
The relationship with the geometric origin of the slip angle is omitted in
this paper because it differs depending on the uniformity of tires.
Changes of the Wear Rate due to Slip Angle, Lateral Force, and Lateral
Force Coefficient
Figure 8 shows a plot of the data in a log-log graph. An empirical equation
obtained for the difference between w (wear rate: g/km) and w0 (wear rate at
zero slip angle) is proportional to the nth power of o~ (slip angle) with reference
to [7] (Eq 1). In all of the following data the origin of the zero slip angle
will be set at the points where the wear rate is smallest during break-in.
w - w0 = aa" (1)
By using the above result, the following empirical equation for smooth tires
(SM-A) is obtained:
Within the range of the slip angle of ___2deg, the lateral force is proportional
to the slip angle. Therefore, when the load is constant, we can obtain the
next empirical formula that the wear rate is proportional to the power of three
i n / ~ (lateral force) or ky (lateral force coefficient = lateral force/load) to set
the cornering stiffness of this tire at Ky = 1.244 (kN/deg),
In Fig. 8, the wear rate is converted from weight loss per distance travelled
to groove depth reduction per distance travelled, assuming that the tire tread
area is 2000 cm 2 and the specific gravity of the rubber is 1. The figure
suggests that the minimum wear rate values are close to those of commonly
used tires under normal usage.
Wear Rate
mm/km gr/km
0.05 10
(5/100)
w - O . 004=1.3 a :3
\
W--W 0
0.005 1
(5/1000)
0.0005 0.1
(5/10000)
//I Tire: 175/70R13
' SM-A
/ Load: 3 kN
I. Pres.: 200 kP
VelocitY: 20 km/h
I I I IIIl ~ I
0.00005 0.01
(0.5/IOOO0)
1.0
O.
Slip Angle (deg)
FIG. 8 - - Relation between slip angle and wear rate.
W--W0
1.0
I. Pres. 200 kP
bO
Velocity: 20 km/h
Temp. 30
e~
QJ 0.1 Tire
SM-A : ky=0.25
w - 0 . 0 1 = 0 . 0 1 0 6 L '~'12
Normal-A : k y=0. 183
w - - 0 . 0 3 = 0 . 0127 L 2. 55
Normal-B : k , = O . 183
w - 0 . 0 3 = 0 . 0 1 9 1 L ~. zt
0.01
10
Load (kN)
FIG. 9 - - Effect of load on the wear rate under the condition of constant lateralforce coefficient.
load under the condition o f a constant lateral force coefficient using the
s m o o t h tire S M - A , and two 175/70R13 tires ( A and B) with n o r m a l tread
patterns. A s a result, in Fig. 9, w e find in the empirical formula, that the wear
rate is proportional to the p o w e r o f 2 - 3 . 5 of the load L when the load values
range from 2 k N to 5 kN:
smooth tire S M - A w = 0.01 + 0.0106L 3"2 ky = 0.25 (5)
0.3
0.2 -
~3
~3
0.1
Tire: 175/70R13 S~-B
Load: 3 kN
ky=0.25
0 I I I
I00 200 300 400
I. Pres. (kP)
F I G . 1 0 - - Effect of internal pressure on the wear rate under the condition of constant lateral
force coefficient.
smooth tire SM-B. The figure indicates that within the range of practical use
(200-300 kPa), the wear rate shows the smallest value. The changes in wear
rate due to variations in internal pressure are smaller than the wear rate
variations due to the lateral force or load.
Load: 3 kN
I.Pres. 200 kP
Velocity: 20 km/h
Temp. 30
1.0
0.1
~ S SM-B
ire
W--Wo
-0.004=0.48 Fy 3,5
M-G3
-0.0045=0.50 F , TM
M-G7
-0.005=0.64 F , "-al
0.01 I I I I t I I I[ [ I
O. 1.0
Tire: SH-67
Load: 3 kN
I. Pres.: 200 kP
0.6 geI.
Slip Angle: 0.7 ~
c~
Temp.
0.2
Temp. (C)
30 ~ 45 ~ 60~
0 J i M I i
5 10 20 40
Running Velocity (km/h)
F1G. 1 2 - - E f f e c ~ o f v e ~ c i ~ a n d ~ m p e r a m r e on w e a r ra~.
with normal tread pattern). Then, we repeated the same wear experiment on
this tire twice. Table 1 gives the distance travelled and the results of the
above experiments. Figure 13 shows the relationship between the lateral force
coefficient and the wear rate. (First, we measured the cornering stiffness of
the tire before and after the test. Second, we assumed that this stiffness
changed in proportion to the wear amount. Third, we obtained the lateral
force coefficients from these sfiffnesses and the slip angle.) By observing the
aforementioned procedure, we can reduce the error range. However, due to
the large grade of empirical equations, the tolerance of the lateral force coeffi-
cient would affect the result greatly.
Cornering Lateral
Test Slip Angle Run. Dis. Wear Rate W - Wo Stiff./Load Force
No. (deg) (km) (g/km) (g/kin) ( l/deg) Coeff. ky
- Tire: Normal-D
Load: 3 kN
- I. Pres.: 200 kP /
W--W 0 Temp.: 35o C /
Velocity: 20 k m / h /
1.0
9~.
0. i Test No.
77~20~
.6_32 .2 kr 3 ' ' 8
The left side of Fig. 14 is a microscopic photo of the surface of the central
part of the tread that was tested on general roads under normal conditions.
The right side of Fig. 14 is a photo of the same part of the tread surface after
this wear test with the mica powder coated on it and with a slip angle of
+_0.5 deg. There are no large differences between the results of the two cases.
However, it was noticed that the tire in the latter case is covered with a
slightly finer texture.
FIG. 14 - - Microphotographs o f the tread surfaces; left: normal run on public road, right." run
on tire test machine with mica powder at +0.5 deg slip angle.
Load: 3 kN
W -- Wo I. P r e s . : 200 kP
V e l o c i t y : 20 km/h
1.0
Tire
Normal-h
w-0.005=62.8 k ya. 40
Normal-B
9 w-0.006=29.2 k ~.o7
~0.1 Normal-C
w-0.005=33.2 k~a'58
0.01 . . . . . I I f p T irlJl
0.1 1.0
Lateral Force Coef. k y
Wear Index
When a vehicle is travelling on a particular road, the frequency distribution
of the lateral acceleration of ky varies depending on the road conditions and
the driving situations. However, in this paper, it is assumed that it can be
represented by the following normal distribution function:
p = (l/or 2 ~ ) exp(-kZ/2cr 2) (14)
It is also assumed that the lateral acceleration is equal to the lateral force
coefficient and that the three values of the standard deviation cr are 0.08,
0.10, and 0.12 g depending on the following three types of driving: (1)
gentle driving with relatively small lateral acceleration (roads with few
curves), (2) average driving (average roads), and (3) comparatively rough
driving (roads with many curves). Based on these assumptions, if we take
the wear rate w = w0 + a ~ , we can obtain the following equation for the
wear index Wi:
Table 2 provides the calculated wear indices for the aforementioned tires.
This table indicates that there are only small differences between tires A and
B in the case of gentle driving (~ = 0.08). However, the differences become
wider in the case of rough driving (or = 0.12). As these facts show, the
frequency distributions of the lateral force, which are affected by the type of
driving, influence the wear index.
Experiments on the Wear Rates and Friction when the Slip Angle and
the Variation of Sliding Velocity are Large
The tire used in this experiment is a smooth tire SM-C (175/65R14) with
an SBR tread. The load, lateral force, velocity, and the tire surface temperature
were measured when cornering at a slip angle of 15 deg. The presence of
the lateral force causes one side of the tread in the contact area to lift, which
destroys the uniformity of the ground contact pressure distribution [10] and
causes the partial wear of the tread shoulder. Therefore, we set the standard
condition of this experiment as follows: a load of 2 kN, an internal pressure
of 200 kPa, and a camber angle of 3 deg in a direction that makes the wear
uniform.
v = V sin 15 ~ (16)
The relationship between the sliding distance s and distance travelled by the
tire S is as follows:
s = S sin 15 ~ (17)
Also, if we set the load as Fz and the lateral force generated as Fy, the
friction coefficient # can be expressed by the following equation:
F I G . 1 6 - - Particles of worn rubber on the tread surfaces of tested tires; top: coated with mica
powder; bottom: noncoated.
FIG. 1 7 - - Microphotographs of the tread surface of tested tires; left: coated with mica powder;
right: noncoated.
270 TIRE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
weight reduction per unit slide distance (w/s) as the linear wear rate (g/m),
and the abraded weight reduction per unit energy lost (w/E) as the energetic
wear rate (g/kNm).
Changes in the Linear Wear Rate and the Friction Coefficient Due to the
Sliding Velocity
Figure 18 shows the changes in the linear wear rate and the friction coeffi-
cient due to the changes in the sliding velocity from 0.015 to 4 m/s (running
velocity from 0.2 to 52 kin/h) under the conditions of a slip angle of 15 deg,
a load of 2 kN, and an internal pressure of 200 kPa. Above the velocity at
which the friction coefficient is highest in this figure, squealing noise was
generated due to the stick-slip motion [10]. The friction coefficient, within
this range, was obtained from the mean of the lateral force values.
SAKAI ON THE FRICTION AND WEAR OF TREAD RUBBER 271
0.4 i 1.0
0.8
0.3 wo
06
0.2
0.4
r
r 0.1 Ave. Contact Pres. 260 (kP)
.5 O. 2
0 i f , , , I f , I 0
9 015 . 0 3 . 0 6 .125 .25 .5 1 2 4
This figure also indicates that both the linear wear rate and the friction
coefficient reached their peak values at a sliding velocity of about 0.5 m/s,
and the changes in the linear wear rate according to sliding velocity are larger
than those of the friction coefficient.
0.2 1.0
Q
0.8 _
0.6
0.1 E n e r g e t i c Wear Rate
0.4
0 i t ) i r f t t 0
.015 .03 .06 .125 .25 ,5 1 2 4
Slip Velocity (m/s)
~ G . 19 - - VaHatwns ~ ~e ene~etic wear ra~ (we~ht r e ~ c ~ n per unit energy Mss) and
~ictioncoefficientasa~nct&n ~ s l ~ v e l o c i ~ .
1.2
z
0.2 1.0
r
0.8 o
f...9
e-,
9
0 , I I I I t I I 0
35 ~ 40 ~ 45 ~ 50 ~ 55 ~ 60 ~ 65 ~
Temperature (C)
FIG. 20 - - Variations of the energetic wear rate and friction coefficient as a function of surface
temperature.
SAKAI ON THE FRICTION AND WEAR OF TREAD RUBBER 273
1.4
1.2
z
0.2 1.0
r
9
0.8
r~
9
~9 o.6 ~
Energetic Wear Rate
0.1
;=
~9
Temp. : 50 ~ (C) 0.4
e- Slip Yelocity: 0.23 (m/s)
0.2
0 I ! I I __ 0
that both value changes are approximately proportional to each other. The
decrease in the values with the temperature rise was caused by the moving
of the whole curve indicated in Fig. 19 to a direction of higher velocity
along with the increase in temperature by the relation to the W L F transfor-
mation [1].
pressure, the energetic wear rate increases only by approximately 20%, which
suggests that even if there are differences in the surface conditions of the
asphalt road and the safety-walk, their influence is not great enough to change
the wear location.
References
[1] Schallamach, A., "Recent Advances in Knowledge of Rubber Friction and Tire Wear,"
Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1968.
[2] Southern, Eric, "Rapid Tire Wear Measurements Using a Two-Wheeled Trailer," Tire
Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, Feb., 1973.
[3] Uchiyama, Y., "The Effect of the Environment on the Friction and Wear of Blended
Rubber," Tire Science and Technology, TSTCA, Vol. 22, No. 1, January-March, 1994,
pp. 2-18.
[4] Brenner, F. C., et al., "Elements in the Road Evaluation of Tire Wear," Tire Science and
Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, Feb., 1973.
[5] Mcintosh, K. W., "Laboratory Tire Treadwear Testing," Tire Science and Technology,
Vol. 1, No. 1, Feb., 1973.
[6] Ambelang, J. C., "Testing of Treadwear under Laboratory and under Service Conditions,"
Tire Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, Feb., 1973.
[7] Yamazaki, S., Fujikawa, T., Hasegawa, A., and Ogasawara, S., "Indoor Test Procedures
SAKAI ON THE FRICTION AND WEAR OF TREAD RUBBER 275
for Evaluation of Tire Treadwear and Influence of Suspension Alignment," Tire Science
and Technology, TSTCA, Vol. 17, No. 4, October-December, 1989, pp. 236-273.
[8] Waiters, M. H., "Uneven Wear of Vehicle Tires," Tire Science and Technology, TSTCA,
Vol. 21, No. 4, October-December, 1993, pp. 202-219.
[9] Padovan, J., Padovan, P., and Kazempour, A., "Spinup Wear in Aircraft Tires," Tire
Science and Technology, TSTCA, Vol. 21, No. 3, July-September, 1993, pp. 138-162.
[10] Sakai, H., "Study on Squeal Noise of Tires," Journal of the Society of Rubber, in Japan
Vol. 67, No. 5, 1994.
[11] Sakai, H., Tire Mechanics, Grandprix Co. 1992.
[12] Sakai, E. H., "Measurement and Visualization of the Contact Pressure Distribution of
Rubber Disks and Tires," Tire Science and Technology, TSTCA, Vol. 23, No. 4, October-
December, 1995, pp. 238-255.
[13] Fujikawa, T., et al., "Actual contact area Between Tread and Road Surface," Journal of
Japan Automobile Research Inst., Inc., Vol. 14, No. 1, 1992.