Professional Documents
Culture Documents
proved functionality during pizza baking, but, under Mozzarella cheeses was 0.84 g, 0.80 g, and 0.99 g,
heating conditions >175°C the cheese browned exten- respectively. After baking, the cheese was allowed to
sively. Because many pizza manufacturers bake pizza cool to 25°C (ca. 5 min) and was reweighed to deter-
at temperatures ≥260°C, the tendency of the cheese to mine the amount of moisture lost. Moisture loss was
brown excessively has become a particular concern to divided by the total initial weight of cheese, multi-
Mozzarella cheese manufacturers ( 6 ) . Thus, the lack plied by 100, to express the moisture loss per 100 g of
of proteolysis alone does not seem to be the key cheese. Photographs were taken after baking to
difference causing the limited melting and scorching record shred fusion, melting, and browning.
characteristics of lower fat Mozzarella cheese. To
date, no studies have been conducted on the third Actual Pizza Baking Test
major difference between full fat and fat-free or lower
fat Mozzarella cheese, namely, the FO release. The actual pizza baking test was used to confirm
Therefore, the objective of the present study was to simulated results for melting and browning behaviors
determine the effect of FO release on the functionality of the cheese during use as a pizza topping. The pizza
of fat-free, lower fat, and full fat Mozzarella cheeses was made by placing 150 g of tomato sauce (Ragu
during pizza baking. The effect of a physical barrier Traditional Old World Style; Van Den Bergh Foods
on the functionality of fat-free, lower fat, and full fat Co., Lisle, IL) on a 30-cm pizza crust (Frozen Deli
Mozzarella cheeses during baking was also deter- Style; P&C Food Markets, Inc., Syracuse, NY).
mined. Based on these results, a melting and brown- Cheese and oil coatings were applied as described. All
ing model for Mozzarella cheese is proposed. pizzas were baked using the same conditions (com-
mercial food service pizza oven for 5 min at 232°C ) as
the simulated pizza baking test. Photographs of the
MATERIALS AND METHODS
pizzas were taken after baking to record shred fusion,
melting, and browning of the cheese.
Simulated Pizza Baking Test
Fat-free Mozzarella cheese (<0.25% fat, 66.4%
A test simulating pizza baking was used to moisture, and 25% protein; Polly-O Fat Free, Kraft
eliminate the influence of the pizza dough and sauce Food Inc., Glenview, IL) was shredded, and 300 g
on the baking characteristics of cheeses with different were placed over the sauce and crust. Prior to baking,
fat contents. Three Mozzarella cheeses of different one-half of the pizza was temporarily covered with a
composition were used in the test: commercial fat-free plastic sheet to prevent that half from being sprayed,
Mozzarella cheese (<0.25% fat, 64.2% moisture, and and the other half was sprayed with Pam (butter
27.4% protein; Sorrento Cheese Co., Inc., Buffalo, flavor; American Home Food Products, Inc., Madison,
NY), low-fat Mozzarella cheese (5.8% fat, 54.0% NJ) to form an HSC on the upper surface of the
moisture, 32.1% protein; Cornell University, Ithaca, cheese shreds on the pizza. The total spray time was
NY), and commercial LMPS Mozzarella (21.0% fat, about 4 s, which corresponded to about 3 g of coating
49.1% moisture, and 25.8% protein; Sorrento Cheese material for 150 g of cheese. The exact amount of
Co., Inc.). Shredded cheese (ca. 100 g weighed to the hydrophobic material applied to the cheese was not
nearest 0.01 g ) was spread evenly on the bottom of a known because, in addition to canola oil, Pam con-
20.3-cm diameter × 3.2-cm deep preweighed alumi- tained (in decreasing content) grain alcohol, lecithin,
num pie pan. The cheese in the pan was then baked natural favors, annatto, and propellant. Pam was
in a conveyer belt forced-air type of commercial food used instead of the hand pump dispenser with vegeta-
service pizza oven (Impinger model 1132; Lincoln ble oil because the delivery system of the Pam gave
Food Service Products, Inc., Fort Wayne, IN) for 5 a more uniform application of the HSC on the cheese
min at 232°C. There were three different treatments: surface. The use of vegetable oil in the hand pump
1 ) nothing was done to the pie pan or cheese (con- dispenser produced the same result as the PAM but
trol), 2 ) about 1 g of vegetable oil (100% canola oil; was not uniformly distributed on the pizza surface.
Commander Foods, Inc., Syracuse, NY) was sprayed This same procedure was followed for LMPS Moz-
onto the surface of the cheese shreds after they were zarella cheese (Sorrento Cheese Co., Inc.).
placed in the pie pan [hydrophobic surface coating, Lower fat Mozzarella cheese (ca. 8.75% fat, 54.0%
( HSC)], and 3 ) aluminum foil was placed over the moisture, and 31.0% protein) from a previous study
aluminum pan and cheese [physically covered, ( PC)]. ( 8 ) was also used in the pizza baking test. Cheeses
A hand pump spray bottle was used to spray the oil from each of the three treatments (control,
on the cheese surface. The average amount of vegeta- homogenized milk, and homogenized cream) were
ble oil sprayed on the fat-free, low fat, and LMPS shredded and distributed evenly over one-third of a
pizza. The pizza was sprayed entirely with Pam. The face of the control cheese formed a hard, brown skin
total spray time was about 8 s, which corresponded to and raised about 5 cm upon baking, followed by
about 6 g of coating material/300 g of cheese. scorching of the raised cheese surfaces. In contrast,
the HSC cheese shreds (Figure 1, top and middle
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION panels) melted, fused, and formed light brown
blisters such as those normally found with cheese of
much higher fat in the simulated pizza baking test
Simulated Pizza Baking (Figure 1, bottom panel). These results indicated
The results of the simulated pizza baking test are that the moisture lost at the surface of the cheese
shown in Table 1. For any given fat level, the shred and subsequent skin formation was important
and that the total amount of moisture loss was not a
amounts of moisture lost for the control and HSC
major factor. The control and HSC LMPS Mozzarella
cheeses were about the same, but the PC cheeses lost
cheeses (Figure 1, bottom panel) had the same melt
less moisture. The low fat Mozzarella cheese was an
and appearance. This result was not surprising be-
exception because, in this case, the HSC cheese lost
cause the higher fat LMPS Mozzarella cheese inher-
more moisture than did the control, but the difference
ently has enough FO release to prevent surface
was small. These results were surprising because the
moisture loss and skin formation during baking.
HSC was expected to prevent moisture loss from the Therefore, the added FO of the HSC treatment had no
cheese. Also surprising was the large total water loss effect (i.e., control and HSC appear the same) on the
from the cheese at all fat levels; Mozzarella cheese baking characteristics of LMPS Mozzarella cheese
was not expected to lose about half of its moisture (Figure 1, bottom panel).
when baked under the conditions used for pizza bak- At all fat levels of Mozzarella cheese, the PC
ing. Given such large moisture loss, the functional cheeses lost about half of the moisture that was lost
properties of the cheese after pizza baking (i.e., when by the control and HSC cheeses. For the fat-free, low
it is consumed), would be expected to be significantly fat, and LMPS Mozzarella cheeses, this resulted in
different from the functional properties of the cheese complete cheese shred melt but no browning (Figure
before pizza baking. However, no reports in the litera- 1). The decreased moisture loss could have been due
ture compare composition and functional properties of to a decrease in heat transfer into the PC cheeses
Mozzarella cheese before and after pizza baking. compared with that of the control cheeses. That is,
More work is needed in this area. the aluminum cover produces an insulative air space
Even though moisture loss from the HSC cheese (saturated with moisture) between the heat source
was the same or greater than the control, the effect of and the cheese that would be expected to reduce the
the HSC on cheese melting and browning was dra- heat transfer from the oven to the cheese. This expla-
matic. These effects for the fat-free, low fat, and nation was substantiated in a separate experiment
LMPS Mozzarella cheese are shown in Figure 1. For (results not shown) showing that, when both cheeses
the fat-free (Figure 1, top panel) and low fat (Figure are subjected to the same baking time and tempera-
1, middle panel) Mozzarella cheeses, the entire sur- ture, the PC cheese came out of the oven about 35°C
TABLE 1. Moisture loss from fat-free (<0.25% fat), low fat (5.8% fat), and LMPS1 (21% fat)
Mozzarella cheese shreds that were left uncovered (control), covered with a hydrophobic surface
coating (HSC), or physically covered ( P C ) during simulated pizza baking (commercial food service
pizza oven at 232°C for 5 min).
Treatment2
Cheese
type Control HSC PC SEM LSD3
(g/100 g of cheese)
Fat-free 32.04a 31.58b 15.91c 0.54 1.73
Low fat 28.23b 29.25a 15.46c 0.17 0.56
LMPS 27.92a 27.30a 15.39b 0.25 0.81
a,b,cMeans within a row without a common superscript differ ( P < 0.05).
1Low moisture, part-skim.
2n = 3 per treatment.
3Least significant difference ( P = 0.05).
the observed effect of temperature on softening point, reached the temperature that allows it to flow and
flow, and AV of Mozzarella cheese. fuse with adjacent shreds. Further dehydration leads
It is absolutely critical that the surface of the shred to excessive browning and scorching of the surface,
not dry to the point of making a skin or hard shell giving the pizza an atypical burnt appearance with
that prevents the softened cheese from flowing. In the many dark brown intact shreds present as shown for
early stages of convection heating, a temperature gra- fat-free Mozzarella in the lower half of the pizza in
dient exists between the surface and the center of the Figure 2.
cheese shred. The center of the cheese shred must Fat-free and lower fat cheese: melting and
reach the softening point and flow before the higher browning with HSC. After the fat-free or lower fat
temperature at the shred surface causes a skin or Mozzarella cheese shown in Figure 6a is lightly
hard shell to form. Once the entire cheese shred coated with a small amount of hydrophobic material
softens and flows, it fuses with adjacent shreds. Even- (Figure 7a), the fat coating at 38°C (Figure 7b) is
tually all of the shreds fuse and form one molten mass sufficient to prevent the rapid surface dehydration
of cheese on the pizza. during pizza baking as the temperature increases.
Full fat cheese: blister formation and brown- Therefore, cheese shreds from fat-free and lower fat
ing. Above 100°C (at the cheese surface and below), Mozzarella with an HSC soften and flow (Figure 7c)
water is converted to steam; this steam and the and fuse with adjacent shreds as the temperature
trapped air between cheese shreds collect in bubbles increases from about 55 to 80°C. As a result, during
under the molten cheese surface. Next, the cheese actual pizza baking, melting, browning, and blister
surface over these bubbles begins to rise from the formation are similar (except for differences in fre-
expansion of the trapped air and steam, initiating the quency and spacial distribution of blisters) for fat-
formation of a blister. The size and characteristics of free (Figure 2, upper half), lower fat (Figure 3), and
the blister are dependent on the size of the bubble full fat Mozzarella cheeses (Figure 4).
and, with respect to the cheese, the amount of expres-
sible serum, proteolysis, ratio of moisture to protein,
CONCLUSIONS
pH, and any other factors that influence the AV of the
cheese. That is, the greater the capacity of the cheese Lack of fat diffusion over the shred surface results
is to stretch without breaking and releasing the in rapid surface dehydration and skin formation that
trapped air and steam, the larger is the size of the limits melting and allows scorching of fat-free and
blister. As the cheese rises, the top of the blister lower fat Mozzarella cheeses during pizza baking in
becomes thin, liquid fat at the surface flows down the commercial food service pizza ovens. A barrier to
sides of the forming blister, moisture is lost from block moisture loss at the shred surface that prevents
cheese at the top surface of the blister, and the top of skin formation, using an HSC, gives fat-free and
the blister turns brown. At other locations on the lower fat Mozzarella cheese melting and browning
surface of the pizza, where FO is still present and characteristics similar to those of full fat Mozzarella
excessive moisture is not lost from the surface, the cheese. This new knowledge, along with the
cheese remains white. The areas with different knowledge from prior research, should lead to the
browning appearance differ only in the degree of sur- development of reduced, low, and fat-free Mozzarella
face moisture loss, which explains why a Mozzarella cheeses for use on pizza products that will have ac-
cheese with a homogeneous lactose or galactose con- ceptable sensory characteristics over a wide range of
tent can have a heterogeneous appearance (localized pizza baking conditions.
browning) during pizza baking. This series of events
leads to the overall appearance of full fat cheese on FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS
pizza after baking (Figure 4).
Fat-free and lower fat cheeses: melting and Prevention of dehydration and skin formation at
browning. For fat-free or lower fat cheeses, there the surface of the cheese shred appears to be the key
initially is an absence of fat or a lack of fat, respec- that unlocked the mystery of Mozzarella cheese melt-
tively, at the surface of the shred (Figure 6a). There- ing and browning during pizza baking. It is likely
fore, there is insufficient fat diffusion on the surface that this concept applies to cheeses other than Moz-
of the cheese shred during heating to 38°C (Figure zarella and, perhaps, other fat-free and lower fat
6b). At higher temperatures, the cheese shred surface foods as well. For example, FO release at the cheese
rapidly dehydrates, and a brown skin or shell forms surface might enhance melted functionality of fat-free
on each shred (Figure 6c) before the cheese has and lower fat processed cheese. More work should be
done to identify other areas of application of this trolled, it will be possible to develop a high quality
technology. pizza with significantly less fat.
Another exciting area opened up by this research
would be the development of a unique delivery system ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
for the HSC. It might not be practical for fat-free or
lower fat Mozzarella cheese manufacturers to spray The authors thank Maureen Chapman, Laura Lan-
oil onto cheese shreds prior to packaging because of dolf, Joanna Lynch, Lloyd Metzger, and Pat Wood for
clumping of the shreds in the package. Furthermore, their technical support and the Northeast Dairy
for a frozen pizza, a coating of oil on the cheese shreds Foods Research Center and Dairy Management Inc.
might give a consumer the impression that the pizza for their financial support.
is greasy or high in fat content. One way to overcome
these problems would be to encapsulate the oil in a REFERENCES
material that would contain the oil in powdered form
1 Alvarez, R. J. 1986. Expectations of Italian cheese in the pizza
on the surface until it is needed (about 40°C). Gela- industry. Pages 130–138 in Proc. 23rd Annu. Marschall Invit.
tin, because of its melting properties, might be one Cheese Sem. Marschall Products, Madison, WI.
source of encapsulation material. 2 Fife, R. L., D. J. McMahon, C. J. Oberg. 1996. Functionality of
low fat Mozzarella cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 79:1903–1910.
Now that the melting and browning of fat-free and 3 Kindstedt, P. S. 1991. Functional properties of Mozzarella
lower fat Mozzarella cheeses can be controlled, other cheese on pizza: a review. Cult. Dairy Prod. J. 26:27–31.
problems associated with the sensory characteristics 4 Kindstedt, P. S. 1993. Mozzarella and pizza cheese. Ch. 12 in
Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology. Vol. 2. 2nd ed.
of these cheeses need to be addressed. Before work P. F. Fox, ed. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom.
can be done to improve the sensory aspects of the 5 Kindstedt, P. S., and L. J. Kiely. 1992. Revised protocol for the
melted cheese after pizza baking, quantitative tests to analysis of melting properties of Mozzarella cheese by helical
viscometry. J. Dairy Sci. 75:676–682.
measure the important characteristics need to be de- 6 Matzdorf, B., S. L. Cuppett, L. Keeler, and R. W. Hutkins. 1994.
veloped. Even after an HSC has been used to improve Browning of Mozzarella cheese during high temperature pizza
the melt and appearance of fat-free and lower fat baking. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2850–2853.
7 Merrill, R. K., C. J. Oberg, and D. J. McMahon. 1994. A method
Mozzarella cheese on pizza, there is still a difference for manufacturing reduced fat Mozzarella cheese. J. Dairy Sci.
in the postbaking chewiness and flavor of the LMPS 77:1783–1788.
Mozzarella and fat-free or low-fat Mozzarella cheese. 8 Rudan, M. A., D. M. Barbano, M. R. Guo, and P. S. Kindstedt.
1998. Effect of the modification of fat particle size by homogeni-
Fat-free and lower fat Mozzarella can be excessively zation on composition, proteolysis, functionality, and appear-
tough and chewy after baking on a pizza. The de- ance of reduced fat Mozzarella cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 81:
velopment of an objective method to quantify the 2065–2076.
9 Rudan, M. A, D. M. Barbano, and P. S. Kindstedt. 1998. Effect
postbaking chewiness of the cheese will be an impor- of fat replacer (Salatrim) on chemical composition, proteoly-
tant tool necessary to solve this problem. The lack of sis, functionality, appearance, and yield of reduced fat Moz-
fat-like or butter flavors is another important defi- zarella cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2077–2088.
ciency of fat-free and lower fat Mozzarella cheese. The 10 Rudan, M. A, J. J. Yun, D. M. Barbano, P. S. Kindstedt, K. L.
Larose, and M. Kalab. 1994. Impact of fat reduction on composi-
HSC technology includes the ability to add flavors to tion, proteolysis, functional properties and microstructure of
the coating that is applied to the cheese shreds. For Mozzarella cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 77(Suppl. 1):34.(Abstr.)
example, butter (or other) flavors could be added to 11 Ruegg, M., P. Eberhard, L. M. Popplewell, and M. Peleg. 1991.
Melting properties of cheese. Pages 36–43 in IDF. Bull. 268, Int.
the oil. As only one of the many possibilities, a deliv- Dairy Fed., Brussels, Belgium.
ery system to apply this technology could consist of a 12 Tunick, M. H., K. L. Mackey, J. J. Shieh, P. W. Smith, P. Cooke,
butter-flavored oil encapsulated in gelatin and ap- and E. L. Malin. 1993. Rheology and microstructure of low-fat
Mozzarella cheese. Int. Dairy J. 3:649–662.
plied to the surface of cheese shreds prior to pizza 13 Tunick, M. H., E. L. Malin, P. W. Smith, and V. H. Holsinger.
baking. 1995. School lunch pizzas topped with low-fat Mozzarella
Before the start of this research, the goal of produc- cheese. Cult. Dairy Prod. J. 30(2):6–9.
14 Tunick, M. H., E. L. Malin, P. W. Smith, J. J. Shieh, B. C.
ing a high quality fat-free or lower fat cheese for use Sullivan, K. L. Mackey, and V. H. Holsinger. 1993. Proteolysis
on pizza seemed impossible because of the poor melt- and rheology of low fat and full fat Mozzarella cheeses prepared
ing and excessive browning of these cheeses during from homogenized milk. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3621–3628.
15 Visser, J. 1991. Factors affecting the rheological and fracture
baking. However, now that the melting and browning properties of hard and semi-hard cheese. Pages 49–61 in IDF.
of Mozzarella cheese at any fat level can be con- Bull. 268, Int. Dairy Fed., Brussels, Belgium.