Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
This section focuses on basic projects for coating concrete. Topics covered include:
the most suitable coatings and coating systems, how to assess and repair the
concrete surface, and issues peculiar to coating concrete.
Before preparing the surface, it may be necessary to repair common, non-structural
damage to the concrete such as holes and cracks. For structural repair of concrete,
which is beyond the scope of this manual, contact the Company's civil and struc-
tural engineers.
When selecting a concrete coating, it is important to know its intended exposure,
such as environment, temperature, and immersion. The selection guides and data
sheets for coating concrete in mild environments are available in the Quick Refer-
ence Guide. For critical projects, consult one of the Company's coating specialists
(also listed in the Quick Reference Guide).
From the standpoint of application, there is no one standard technique because of
the complexity of this surface. While general information is offered in this section,
specific assistance is available both from manufacturers and the Company's coating
specialists.
Contents Page
610 Coating Concrete in General 600-3
611 Existing Structures or New Construction
612 Engineering Assistance
613 Reasons for Coating Concrete
620 Descriptions of Coatings for Concrete 600-4
621 Coatings
622 Coating Systems
630 Selection 600-9
631 Defining Conditions
640 Assessing and Repairing Concrete 600-10
641 Assessing the Surface
Protection from the environment. One of the most important factors in selecting a
coating system is its environment: exposure to temperature, physical abuse, and
immersion service.
Concrete may require protection from its environment in API separators, sulfur pits,
pump bases, floors, or other primary containment.
Protection from wear. One of the main uses of coatings for concrete is to protect
floors from wear. There are coating systems designed for foot, light vehicular, and
heavy equipment traffic.
Maintenance. Because concrete is a porous material, it retains dirt and stains easily.
Coating concrete can reduce significantly the cost of routine cleaning.
Safety. Non-slip or skid resistant coatings are available for traffic safety on
concrete.
Regulations
In addition to practical maintenance, existing regulations require owners to protect
concrete with coatings and linings. A discussion of some regulations follows.
Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), owners must install
secondary containment, such as impoundment basins, for aboveground tanks that
store hazardous wastes. While concrete is one of the most cost-effective materials
for this service, RCRA does not consider concrete a material suitable for containing
hazardous wastes unless it is coated or lined.
Example: An impoundment basin is one form of secondary containment.
Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, Congress mandated that the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) study the need for regulating aboveground petroleum
storage tanks. This impending regulation could result in the Company having to line
or provide secondary containment for all petroleum storage tanks.
It is also possible that State and local environmental agencies might create and
enforce equal or more stringent regulations for secondary containment.
Regardless of current regulations, consider coating concrete wherever it is neces-
sary to contain or exclude fluid.
The four main systems for coating concrete are as follows: non-reinforced thin film,
flake-reinforced, glass-flake laminate, and elastomeric polyurethane.
As most coating systems for steel are equally suitable for concrete, see Section 100
of this manual for general information about non-reinforced, thin-film, and glass-
flake-reinforced coatings.
621 Coatings
Epoxy
Epoxy resins are the most common, thin-film coatings for concrete.
Advantages:
• Very good resistance to bases and many solvents
• Good adhesion to concrete and are easy to apply
Disadvantages:
• Poor resistance to acid unless modified by a phenolic
Isophthalic Polyester
There are two major classes of polyester resins, but the Company uses only isoph-
thalic which is the main resin in laminate-reinforced systems.
Advantages:
• Corrosion protection
• Least expensive resin
Disadvantages:
• Poorer resistance to chemicals than other resins
Epoxy Novolacs
Novolacs are second generation epoxies with greater cross-linking density.
Advantages:
• Greater resistance to chemical attack and high temperatures than all other
epoxies
Disadvantages:
• More expensive and less flexible when compared to standard epoxies
Polyurethane
There are literally thousands of polyurethane formulations from hard roller-skate
wheels to elastomeric materials with the elasticity of rubber bands.
Advantages:
Through its wide variety of formulations, polyurethane can have many different
properties.
• Chemical, abrasion, and impact resistant
• Tensile strength
• Elasticity
Note Because increases in one property mean decreases in another, many elasto-
meric polyurethanes are not as chemically resistant as the more rigid polyurethanes.
Disadvantages:
• Some elastomeric formulations are not very resistant to chemicals.
Vinyl Ester
A reaction product between polyesters and epoxies, vinyl ester shares many of the
attributes of polyesters.
Advantages:
• Resistant to acid
• Resistant to solvent attack
• Resistant to high temperatures
Disadvantages:
• More costly than an isophthalic polyester or normal epoxy
Uses:
• Mild service conditions
• Splash or spillage environments
• Temporary service
Flake-reinforced
The flake-reinforced coating system is the most common system for concrete.
Flake-reinforced coatings come in both spray- or trowel-applied formulae. Spray is
generally applied in two 15 to 20 mil (DFT) coats for a total of 30 to 40 mils (DFT).
Trowel applied, with a larger reinforcing flake size, is generally applied in two 30 to
40 (mil) coats for a total of 60 to 80 mils (DFT).
Advantages:
• Excellent properties for most environments
• Better than thin film at resisting chemical attack (parallel flakes reduce the
coating's permeability) and physical abuse by abrasion
• Cost less than laminate systems
Disadvantages:
• Rolling is necessary for each layer of either formula so that the flakes lie
parallel to the surface.
☞ Caution Although some manufacturers claim their spray formulae are self
leveling and do not require rolling, always roll this coating to improve its proper-
ties.
Flake-reinforced Sprays. The flake-reinforced spray is applied much like a thin-
film system.
Advantages:
• Twice the thickness of thin films; covers a more uneven surface than thin film
Disadvantages:
• Because they require rolling and extra material, these sprays are marginally
more expensive than thin films but not as costly as the trowel-applied formula.
Trowel-applied Flake-reinforced Coatings.
Advantages:
• More resistant to chemical attack, abrasion, and physical abuse than either the
flake-reinforced spray or thin-film systems
Disadvantages:
• Application considerably more difficult and time consuming than either the
flake-reinforced spray or the thin-film systems; hand smoothing and then
rolling is necessary to orient the glass flakes
Glass-flake Laminate
Laminate-reinforced systems are applied by hand in alternating layers of resin and
glass mat. These coating systems:
• Generally have three layers of resin and two layers of fiberglass mat
• Have a total thickness is 80 to 125 mils
• May require a special surfacing veil and final resin topcoat for some of the
more aggressive services; chemical glass or polyester are the most common
surfacing veils.
After inspecting the completed laminate system, apply a final 10 mil (DFT) resin
coat without which the surface would remain tacky and lack optimum chemical
resistance.
With epoxy resins, this coat gives additional protection from chemical attack and is
called a gel coat. With polyester and vinyl ester resins, the final coat is a 90/10
mixture of resin and wax.
Advantages:
• For severe applications
• Adds structural strength
• Best chemical, wear, and impact resistance
Disadvantages:
• Hand-applied, laminate-reinforced coatings are by far the most expensive
Elastomeric Urethanes
Elastomeric urethanes, developed as internal coatings for tanks, are thicker than
most non-reinforced coatings (30 to 60 mils or more). Applied in one coat, these
tough, rubbery coatings are suitable for certain special applications but are not
among the standard systems because the Company has limited experience with them.
There are two types of elastomeric systems: textile-reinforced and non-reinforced,
both of which can be applied at 40 mils (or greater) DFT.
Advantages:
• Depending on their formulation, elastomeric systems can have very good resis-
tance to impact, abrasion, and wear.
• Because they are elastomeric, manufacturers also claim they can bridge cracks.
☞ Caution While the claim about bridging cracks may be true to some extent, be
certain to design and specify proper repair of all cracks and joints before coating.
Disadvantages:
• All elastomeric systems have a modified polyurethane resin which makes the
system more expensive than some flake-reinforced and thin-film systems.
• Polyurethanes are very moisture sensitive during application.
630 Selection
For definitions of environment, physical abuse, and exposure, see Figures 600-1
through 600-5.
See the Quick Reference Guide for selecting concrete coatings in mild
environments.
For coating concrete in moderate-to-aggressive conditions, contact the Company's
coating specialists listed in the Quick Reference Guide.
Fig. 600-1 Definitions of Environment, Physical Abuse, and Exposure for Concrete Coatings
Description Environment Physical Abuse Exposure
Mild < 140°F, mild acids, No coating loss due to abrasion; N/A
bases, solvents possible light foot traffic. No physical
impact on coating.
Moderate < 140°F, strong Moderate coating loss due to abrasion, N/A
acids, bases, light equipment wear. Possibility of
solvents impact on coating.
Aggressive > 140°F, strong Severe coating loss due to abrasion, N/A
acids, bases, heavy equipment wear. Definite poten-
solvents tial for impact on coating.
Continuous N/A N/A Exposed to the corrosive medium
for longer than 24 hours.
Intermittent N/A N/A Exposed to the corrosive medium
for less than 24 hours—usually
splash or spillage that is cleaned
up within 24 hours
Existing Structures
Attacked by chemicals, contaminated by hydrocarbons, and damaged by mechan-
ical means, existing concrete may require extensive repairs and surface preparation.
A careful inspection should determine whether or not the existing concrete is struc-
turally sound.
Corrosion. Depending on the amount of corrosion in the steel reinforcement, the
concrete will require the following:
• Corroded - Coating or cathodic protection in aggressive environments
• Severely corroded - Replacement of steel reinforcing and the affected concrete
or epoxy-polymer material
Contamination. Depending on the level of contamination, concrete that has been
exposed to oils or other impurities may require high-pressure detergent-and-water
cleaning. It also may require replacing as many inches of concrete as necessary to
remove the contaminants.
Cracks
Among the choices for repairing concrete based on the size and activity (still
moving) are the following:
• Filling them with a sealer
• Making them into expansion joints
• Filling them by pressure injection
Begin with the basic procedures for filling concrete cracks, regardless of size.
Basic Procedure for All Cracks. To repair all cracks, begin by:
1. Blowing any standing water out of the crack
2. Removing oils or chemicals in the crack
☞ Caution Do not inject solvents into cracks to remove oils or chemicals because
this process actually dilutes the contaminants and carries them further into the
concrete surface. Instead use an injection grout that will solubilize the oils and
water, bond to the concrete, and cure with suitable properties for the intended
purpose.
Continue the repair—depending on the size of the crack—by following the steps
either for small or for large cracks, below.
Additional Steps for Small Cracks. To repair small cracks, there are two
alternatives.
Alternative One: Filling with Sealer
1. Grind the crack into a V shape with an opening that is a minimum of ½-inch
wide at the surface of the concrete.
2. Pour or trowel the sealing grout into the crack.
3. Scrape off excess grout.
Alternative Two: Creating Expansion Joints.
Convert small cracks into expansion joints, which allow concrete to expand and
contract with changes in temperature or movement of the substrate. See Figure
600-6, Detail “C”; this figure also covers corrosion control of floor-to-wall expan-
sion joints and floor-to-wall control joints.
As they are highly susceptible to premature failures, design expansion joints care-
fully ½- to 1-inch wide and as shown in Figures 600-6, 600-7, and 600-8.
Note Figure 600-7 shows sealant system for corrosion control in mild environ-
ment; Figure 600-8, for more severe environments.
The steps for creating expansion joints are as follows:
1. Place sufficient joint material between the concrete surfaces to allow the
closed-cell foam-backing rod to come within ½- to 1-inch of the concrete
surface.
2. Pour or trowel on a flexible joint sealant to bring the joint up to the level of the
concrete surface.
3. Place 2-inch-wide, vinyl, electrical tape over the joint to provide a bond
breaker.
4. Place a ½-ounce glass mat, saturated with resin, over the tape.
5. Apply the corrosion coating system over the mat.
Additional Steps for Large Cracks. To repair larger cracks, fill them by pres-
sure injection. The steps for pressure injection are as follows:
1. Grind the crack into a V shape.
2. Select an appropriate size of copper tubing.
3. Drill holes along the crack 1/8-inch larger than the tubing and to the depth of
desired penetration.
4. Insert the tubing into the crack.
5. Grout the crack on the surface to seal it and hold the tubing in place.
Fig. 600-6 Corrosion Control Treatment of Sealed Expansion Joints, Control Joints, and
Cracks in Concrete Foundations
6. Install a grease fitting in the first tube when the grout is cured.
7. Inject grout into the tube with a pump.
8. Allow the grout to flow out of the next tube until the color approaches the orig-
inal mixture to ensure removal of all contaminants.
9. Repeat the process, filling all tubes.
Fig. 600-7 Corrosion Control Treatment of Exposed Expansion Joints in Concrete Integral
with Monolithic Floor/Lining System
Holes
This section provides information on filling both small and large holes.
Small Holes. During blasting, air pockets open in or just below the surface of most
formed concrete. There are two mixes for filling these holes.
• Resin-based material is the Company's preferred method of repair. Some are
powders mixed with the primer and trowel applied which gives a smooth
surface for good coating adhesion. Others are epoxy grouts.
• Portland-cement materials require expert installation and generally need an
additive to reduce shrinkage during cure and to improve adhesion to the old
surface. The problems with this cement are that it does not bond well to cured
concrete; does not cure well in thin layers; and usually leaves a carbonate layer
on the surrounding concrete which can, if not removed, cause coating failures.
Fig. 600-8 Corrosion Control Sealing of Expansion Joints, in Concrete Integral with
Monolithic Floor/Lining System
Large Holes. There are two main choices of fill for larger holes, both of which need
special handling:
• Concrete - Undercut the hole to guarantee mechanical bonding or apply a
chemical bonding agent.
• Compatible resinous grout - Treat forms with a release agent for easy removal.
As formed resinous grouts usually cure with a glazed surface, abrasive blast or
grind this glazing to roughen it to ensure that the coating adheres well.
In either case:
1. Dig a groove ¾-inches wide and ¼-inch deep around the drain or pipe
penetration.
2. Fill the groove with sealant.
3. Butt the corrosion control system against the sealant for mild environments or
extend it to the drain cover in more aggressive environments.
Fig. 600-10 Corrosion Control Treatment of Pipe Penetration through Concrete Wall or Floor
652 Precleaning
To preclean a concrete surface, follow the ASTM D4258 method:
1. Remove:
– Dirt and caked grease manually or with an acid wash
– Grease and oils with low-foaming detergents
– Animal fats or vegetable oils with saponifying agents
2. Patch test to determine the best cleaning procedures for the surface.
Clean or remove the surface until it meets the pre-application requirements.
Blastracking
Blastracking is similar to abrasive blasting but uses metal shot instead of abrasive
Advantages:
• Produces comparable surfaces to abrasive blasting with less dust and waste
material
Disadvantages:
• Restricted to horizontal surfaces because it is a fairly large machine
Acid Etching
Acid etching is the least acceptable cleaning method, but may be used if needed.
The steps for acid etching are:
1. Mix one part of concentrated hydrochloric acid with two parts water to form the
etching solution.
2. Brush the solution on the concrete.
☞ Caution If the etch does not produce a 60-grit, sandpaper-like profile, repeat
the etch.
Diluted acid permeates the concrete surface dissolving salts and other contami-
nants. There is, however, an undesirable side effect; as it dries, the acid deposits the
contaminants on the surface, adversely affecting the bond between the coating and
the concrete.
660 Application
Because of the complexity of coating concrete and the different systems and resins
available, it is impossible to have one uniform application procedure.
670 Inspection
Inspection is an integral part of the quality of a coatings project. The following
references offer guidance about the degree of inspection needed and how to select a
quality inspector.
• Coatings Manual, Section 100
The inspection procedures for steel can be used for inspecting concrete, in most
cases.
• National Association of Corrosion Engineers RP0288, Inspection of Linings on
Steel & Concrete.
• American Society for Testing and Materials D453786, Procedures to Qualify
and Certify Inspection Personnel for Coating Work in Nuclear Facilities.
(Good information about qualifying any coating inspector.)
Some construction details in concrete may need particular attention from the
inspector.
Concrete-to-Steel Interface
In addition to penetrations, other potential concrete-and-steel interfaces need
coating.
See Figure 600-11, Detail “A,” for one example of sealing a pedestal/pipe stand in a
concrete pit.
680 References
The following publications give additional information for repairing and coating
concrete.
1. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Practice for Surface
Cleaning Concrete for Coating (R 1992). ASTM D4258. 1983.
2. ———. Standard Practice for Abrading Concrete (R 1992). ASTM D4259.
1988.
3. ———. Standard Test Method for Indicating Moisture in Concrete by the
Plastic Sheet Method (R 1993). ASTM D4263. 1993.
4. ———. Standard Practice for Determining Coating Contractor Qualifications
for Nuclear Powered Electric Generation Facilities. ASTM D4286. 1990.
5. ———. Standard Guide for Establishing Procedures to Qualify and Certify
Inspection Personnel for Coating Work in Nuclear Facilities. D4537. 1991.
6. ———. Standard Test Method for Pull-off Strength of Coatings Using Portable
Adhesion Testers. ASTM D4541. 1995.