Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group Structure Learning Outcomes: Roles
Group Structure Learning Outcomes: Roles
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Work groups are not like a mob of people, storming through the streets
setting couches on fire over a team win. Work groups are organized and
have structural elements that help the members understand who is
responsible for what tasks, what kind of behaviors are expected of group
members, and more. These structural elements include roles, norms, and
status. Groups are also influenced by size and the degree of group
cohesiveness.
Let’s take a look at how each of those elements creates a structure that
helps the members understand the purpose of and function within the
group.
Roles
Bill Gates is perhaps best known as the principal founder of Microsoft. He
was the CEO, then the chairman, a board member and now, a technical
advisor to the current CEO. He’s also husband of Melinda Gates, father of
their three children, the head of their foundation and a media influencer.
These are all roles that Bill Gates has to manage in his everyday life.
Role identity: the certain actions and attitudes that are consistent with
a particular role.
Role perception: our own view of how we ourselves are supposed to
act in a given situation. We engage in certain types of performance
based on how we feel we’re supposed to act.
Role expectations: how others believe one should act in a given
situation
Role conflict: conflict arises when the duties of one role conflict with
the duties of another role.
BILL GATES
Let’s look at this through the lens of a day in the life of Bill Gates. First, let’s
look at him in the role of fundraiser. When he’s looking for corporate
donations to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, he may visit the CEOs
of other successful corporations. He may shake hands, have some
lunches, get some commitments for money from these CEOs. That’s role
identity. The actions and attitudes that are consistent with a fundraiser.
Bill Gates may choose to wear a suit and tie when he visits these CEOs
looking for donations. He may use “corporate speak” that’s familiar to them.
He may purchase the lunch. That might be Bill Gates’ role perception. It’s
the way he thinks he should behave in the fundraiser role.
Later, he and Melinda may hold a press conference where he announces
to the world that they’ve funded textbooks for 250 schools across the
nation. Responses include headlines of “Yay, Bill and Melinda!” People talk
on Facebook about how Bill and Melinda are really helping communities.
They are meeting our role expectations for them.
Finally, Bill and Melissa race out of the press conference, fight traffic to the
airport, and try to get home to the violin recital of their oldest child. This is
role conflict. The duties of one of Bill’s and Melissa’s roles is in conflict with
another—demands arise from both and need to be managed.
Norms
Norms are the acceptable standards of behavior within a group that are
shared by the members.
Status
In spite of the high status members taking advantage of the norms and
dominating group interactions, equity is an important part of status. We
talked a bit about how perceived equity is a motivator for people. If status is
observed when rewards and resources are distributed among the group
members, then usually all is well.
Size
Does the size of a group affect its dynamics? You bet! But how size affects
the group depends on where you’re looking.
As a rule, smaller groups are faster than their larger counterparts. But when
it comes to decision making, larger groups end up scoring higher marks.
So, if there’s a decision to be made, it’s wise to poll a larger group . . . and
then give the input to a smaller group so they can act on it.
A side note about size: groups with odd numbers of people tend to operate
better than those that have an even number, as it eliminates the issue of a
tie when votes are taken. Groups of five or seven tend to be an ideal size,
because they’re still nimble like a smaller group, but they make solid
decisions like a larger group does.
PRACTICE QUESTION
Cohesiveness
Figure 1.
shrink the size of the group to encourage its members get to know
each other and can interact with each other.
increase the time the group spends together, and even increase the
status of the group by making it seem difficult to gain entry to it.
help the group come to agreement around its goals.
reward the entire group when those goals are achieved, rather than
the individuals who made the biggest contributions to it.
stimulate competition with other groups.
isolate the group physically.
All of these actions can build the all-important cohesiveness that impacts
productivity.
Now that we fully understand what a group is and what its dynamics are,
shall we go build one to work on a project? Or . . . wait. Are we better off
letting one individual person tackle that particular task? We’ll next talk
about making the choice between assigning an individual to work on a
project, versus assigning a group.