Results of The Statistical Analysis Religion

RESULTS OF THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
I. Demographic Profile
Religion
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Roman Catholic 105 68.6 68.6 68.6
Iglesia ni Cristo 1 .7 .7 69.3
Islam 5 3.3 3.3 72.5
Church of God 1 .7 .7 73.2
Assembly of God 2 1.3 1.3 74.5
Born Again 1 .7 .7 75.2
Foursquare 1 .7 .7 75.8
Valid Baptist 2 1.3 1.3 77.1
Methodist 1 .7 .7 77.8
Christian 5 3.3 3.3 81.0
Seventh Day
7 4.6 4.6 85.6
Adventist
Protestant 1 .7 .7 86.3
No Data 21 13.7 13.7 100.0
Total 153 100.0 100.0
- Majority of the respondents (68.6%) are Roman Catholics.

Age
Percent
Valid No Data 18 11.8 11.8 11.8
22.00 3 2.0 2.0 13.7
23.00 9 5.9 5.9 19.6
24.00 4 2.6 2.6 22.2
25.00 11 7.2 7.2 29.4
26.00 8 5.2 5.2 34.6
27.00 3 2.0 2.0 36.6
28.00 5 3.3 3.3 39.9
29.00 7 4.6 4.6 44.4
30.00 14 9.2 9.2 53.6
31.00 11 7.2 7.2 60.8
32.00 3 2.0 2.0 62.7
33.00 6 3.9 3.9 66.7
34.00 9 5.9 5.9 72.5
35.00 12 7.8 7.8 80.4
36.00 8 5.2 5.2 85.6
38.00 4 2.6 2.6 88.2
39.00 2 1.3 1.3 89.5
40.00 5 3.3 3.3 92.8
41.00 1 .7 .7 93.5
42.00 4 2.6 2.6 96.1
43.00 3 2.0 2.0 98.0
45.00 1 .7 .7 98.7
50.00 1 .7 .7 99.3
55.00 1 .7 .7 100.0
Total 153 100.0 100.0
- In terms of age, the respondents exhibited an extensive degree of variation which also
includes those 11.8% who didn’t disclose their age.. Although that may be the case, 81% of
the respondents are in between 25 - 40 years old.
Length of Service (In terms of Years)
Percent
Valid No Data 24 15.7 15.7 15.7
.50 1 .7 .7 16.3
.75 3 2.0 2.0 18.3
.83 2 1.3 1.3 19.6
.92 1 .7 .7 20.3
1.00 14 9.2 9.2 29.4
2.00 23 15.0 15.0 44.4
3.00 14 9.2 9.2 53.6
4.00 10 6.5 6.5 60.1
5.00 13 8.5 8.5 68.6
6.00 5 3.3 3.3 71.9
7.00 9 5.9 5.9 77.8
8.00 4 2.6 2.6 80.4
9.00 5 3.3 3.3 83.7
10.00 7 4.6 4.6 88.2
11.00 5 3.3 3.3 91.5
12.00 1 .7 .7 92.2
13.00 1 .7 .7 92.8
14.00 1 .7 .7 93.5
15.00 5 3.3 3.3 96.7
17.00 1 .7 .7 97.4
18.00 2 1.3 1.3 98.7
20.00 2 1.3 1.3 100.0
Total 153 100.0 100.0
- In terms of the length of service, 52.9% of the respondents falls in between 1 - 5 years. It
should also be noted that in terms of this demographic profile, there is a huge variation on the
responses.
Sex
Percent
No Data 23 15.0 15.0 15.0
Male 41 26.8 26.8 41.8
Valid
Female 89 58.2 58.2 100.0
Total 153 100.0 100.0
- More than half of the respondents (58.2%) disclosed their gender as Female, although those
15% who did not disclose this data might possibly increase the aforementioned value.
Educational Attainment
Percent
No data 23 15.0 15.0 15.0
College Graduate 124 81.0 81.0 96.1
Valid
Post Graduate 6 3.9 3.9 100.0
Total 153 100.0 100.0
- 81% of the respondents are College Graduates, while the remaining 3.9% holds Post
Graduate degrees. It should also noted that there is a 15% of the respondents who did not
disclose their Educational Attainment which may change the values present at hand if called
out.
II. Perceived level of organization support of nurses in the hospital

Statistics
LeadershipAn Benefit and Work Trainings and Recognition
dManagement Renumeration Environment Seminars
Valid 153 153 153 153 153
N
Mean 3.9052 3.72 3.74 3.73 3.47

Interpretation AGREE AGREE AGREE AGREE AGREE
III. Level of Work Engagement
Statistics
Vigor Dedication Absorption
Valid 153 153 153
N
Mean 4.6732 4.7865 4.2092

Very High
Interpretation Very High Level Very High Level
Level
IV. Association between the demographic profile and the perceived organizational
support
RELIGION
Leadership
Benefit and Work Trainings
and Recognitio
Renumeratio Environmen and
Managemen n
n t Seminars
t
Chi-Square 7.598 85.051 42.961 26.989 33.282
p-value 0.576 0.001 0.679 0.861 0.969
Not
Interpretatio Not Not Not
Significant Significan
n Significant Significant Significant
t
AGE
Leadership
and Recognitio
Managemen n
n t Seminars
t
Chi-Square 45.146 124.912 78.463 101.851 110.747
p-value 0.466 0.025 0.904 0.012 0.144
Interpretatio Not Not Significan Not

Significant
n Significant Significant t Significant
Length of Service
Leadership
and Recognitio
Managemen n
n t Seminars
t
Chi-Square 42.319 104.958 84.991 79.212 162.61
p-value 0.128 0.105 0.571 0.128 0
Not
Interpretatio Not Not Not
Significan Significant
n Significant Significant Significant
t
Sex
Leadership
and Recognitio
Managemen n
n t Seminars
t
Chi-Square 6.691 7.084 4.822 5.718 14.038
p-value 0.35 0.528 0.776 0.456 0.081
Not
Interpretatio Not Not Not Not
Significan
n Significant Significant Significant Significant
t
Educational Attainment
Leadership
and Recognitio
Managemen n
n t Seminars
t
Chi-Square 8.088 11.276 10.277 13.392 14.25
p-value 0.232 0.187 0.246 0.037 0.075
Interpretatio Not Not Not Significan Not

n Significant Significant Significant t Significant
* Tested at a 0.05 Significance Level
V. Association between the demographic profile and the Self-Efficacy
Length Educati
Religio of onal
Age Sex
n Servic Attainm
e ent
Chi- 287.77 463.95 591.72
30.293 27.829
Square 7 9 4
p-value 0.001 0.139 0 0.736 0.833
Not Not Not
Interpret Signifi Signifi
Signifi Signifi Significa
ation cant cant
cant cant nt
VI. Association between the demographic profile and Work Engagement
*
VIGOR
Educationa
Length of
Religion Age Sex l
Service
Attainment
Chi-Square 191.427 334,883 447.251 29.491 24.161
p-value 0.104 0.507 0 0.388 0.673

Not Not
Interpretatio Significan Significan Not
Significan Significan
n t t Significant
t t
DEDICATION
Educationa
Length of
Religion Age Sex l
Service
Attainment
Chi-Square 161.029 239.263 423.528 34.097 17.645
p-value 0.157 0.983 0 0.083 0.82

Not Not Not
Interpretatio Significan Not
Significan Significan Significan
n t Significant
t t t
ABSORPTION
Educationa
Length of
Religion Age Sex l
Service
Attainment
Chi-Square 201.611 358.781 401.243 37.814 32.896
p-value 0.303 0.818 0.036 0.221 0.423

Not Not Not
Interpretatio Significan Not
Significan Significan Significan
n t Significant
t t t
Tested at a 0.05 Significance Level
VII. Relationship Between Self Efficacy and Work Engagement

General Self-
Efficacy
Spearman's rho Vigor Correlation Coefficient .114
Sig. (2-tailed) .162
Interpretation Not Significant
Correlation Coefficient .268**
Dedication Sig. (2-tailed) .001
Interpretation Significant
Correlation Coefficient .112
Absorption Sig. (2-tailed) .168
Interpretation Not Significant
VIII. Relationship between Work Engagement and Perceived Organizational Support

Correlations
LeadershipAnd Benefit and Work Trainings and Recognition
Management Renumeration Environment Seminars
-.103 .140 .107 .055 .129
.647 .083 .187 .502 .111
Vigor
Interpret Not
Not Significant Not Significant Not Significant Not Significant
ation Significant
.227 .234 .250 .147 .260
Dedicatio .310 .004 .002 .071 .001
Spearman's rho
n Interpret
Not Significant Significant Significant Not Significant Significant
ation
-.019 .247 .129 -.004 .143
Absorptio .933 .002 .112 .959 .078
n Interpret Not
Not Significant Significant Not Significant Not Significant
ation Significant
IX. Perceived organizational support and self efficacy on predicting Work
Engagement
IX.1 Vigor
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Square Estimate
1 .302a .091 -.193 1.15889
a. Predictors: (Constant), LeadershipAndManagement, Benefit and

Renumeration, Trainings and Seminars, Recognition, Work
Environment
- Based on the R Square value, the interaction of the independent variables with
Religion as a moderator explains 9.1% of the variation on the values on the dependent
variable.
ANOVAa,b
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 2.152 5 .430 .320 .893c
1 Residual 21.488 16 1.343
Total 23.640 21
a. Dependent Variable: Vigor

b. Weighted Least Squares Regression - Weighted by Religion
c. Predictors: (Constant), LeadershipAndManagement, Benefit and Renumeration, Trainings and
Seminars, Recognition, Work Environment
- The ANOVA table shows the statistical significance of the model’s predicting
capability of the dependent variable, and based on the F-ratio and its corresponding p-
value, the model cannot significantly predict the values of the dependent variable.
Coefficientsa,b
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 4.383 1.354 3.237 .005
Benefit and Renumeration -.069 .734 -.069 -.094 .926
Work Environment .494 1.918 .533 .258 .800

1
Trainings and Seminars -.236 1.963 -.254 -.120 .906
Recognition .075 .807 .080 .093 .927
LeadershipAndManagement -.119 .246 -.260 -.483 .636

- Based on the corresponding p-values of each 5 independent variables, it has been

verified that none of these can significantly predict the values of the dependent
variable
Model Summary

Square Estimate
1 .669a .448 .251 1.70106

Renumeration, Recognition, Trainings and Seminars, Work
Environment
- Based on the R Square value, the interaction of the independent variables with Age
as a moderator explains 44..8% of the variation on the values on the dependent
variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 32.856 5 6.571 2.271 .104c
1 Residual 40.511 14 2.894
Total 73.366 19

b. Weighted Least Squares Regression - Weighted by Age
c. Predictors: (Constant), LeadershipAndManagement, Benefit and Renumeration, Recognition,
Trainings and Seminars, Work Environment
Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 4.606 .690 6.676 .000
Benefit and Renumeration -.419 .228 -.725 -1.836 .088
Work Environment 1.083 .500 1.626 2.167 .048

1
Trainings and Seminars -.532 .468 -.793 -1.136 .275
Recognition .179 .255 .265 .702 .494
LeadershipAndManagement -.174 .108 -.363 -1.615 .129


verified that Work Environment can significantly predict the values of the dependent
variable.
Model Summary

Square Estimate
1 .755a
.571 .392 .64527
a. Predictors: (Constant), LeadershipAndManagement, Recognition,

Benefit and Renumeration, Trainings and Seminars, Work Environment
Length of Service as a moderator explains 57.1% of the variation on the values on the
dependent variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 6.640 5 1.328 3.189 .046c
1 Residual 4.997 12 .416
Total 11.636 17

b. Weighted Least Squares Regression - Weighted by Length of Service (In terms of Years)
c. Predictors: (Constant), LeadershipAndManagement, Recognition, Benefit and Renumeration,
value, the model can significantly predict the values of the dependent variable.
Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 4.729 .650 7.277 .000

1
Trainings and Seminars -.550 .368 -.826 -1.495 .161
Recognition .098 .260 .144 .379 .711


verified that Work Environment and Benefits and Renumeration can significantly
predict the values of the dependent variable.
Model Summary

Square Estimate
1 .614a .377 .094 .37712

Environment
- Based on the R Square value, the interaction of the independent variables with Sex
as a moderator explains 37.7% of the variation on the values on the dependent
variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression .948 5 .190 1.334 .320c
1 Residual 1.564 11 .142
Total 2.513 16

b. Weighted Least Squares Regression - Weighted by Sex
Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 4.445 .731 6.082 .000
Work Environment .881 .683 1.417 1.290 .224

1
Trainings and Seminars -.366 .583 -.587 -.628 .543
Recognition .123 .250 .196 .494 .631


variable
Model Summary

Square Estimate
1 .636a .404 .156 .31976

Environment
Educational Attainment as a moderator explains 40.4% of the variation on the values
on the dependent variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression .831 5 .166 1.626 .227c
1 Residual 1.227 12 .102
Total 2.058 17

b. Weighted Least Squares Regression - Weighted by Educational Attainment
Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 4.596 .762 6.033 .000

1
Trainings and Seminars -.506 .517 -.759 -.979 .347
Recognition .196 .268 .294 .731 .479


variable
IX.2 Dedication
Model Summary
Square Estimate
1 .492 a
.242 .005 1.13337

Environment
Religion as a moderator explains 24.2% of the variation on the values on the
dependent variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 6.547 5 1.309 1.019 .439c
1 Residual 20.553 16 1.285
Total 27.100 21
a. Dependent Variable: Dedication

Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 3.207 1.324 2.422 .028
Benefit and Renumeration .272 .718 .255 .379 .710
Work Environment -.355 1.875 -.357 -.189 .852

1
Trainings and Seminars .575 1.920 .579 .300 .768
Recognition -.419 .790 -.417 -.530 .603
LeadershipAndManagement .307 .240 .628 1.277 .220


variable
Model Summary
Square Estimate
1 .753 a
.567 .413 1.56693

Environment
variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 45.044 5 9.009 3.669 .025c
1 Residual 34.374 14 2.455
Total 79.418 19

Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 2.561 .636 4.030 .001
Work Environment -.139 .461 -.201 -.302 .767

1
Trainings and Seminars .583 .431 .835 1.352 .198
Recognition -.200 .235 -.285 -.851 .409


variable.
Model Summary
Square Estimate
1 .766 a
.587 .415 .62907

dependent variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 6.744 5 1.349 3.408 .038c
1 Residual 4.749 12 .396
Total 11.493 17

Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 2.613 .633 4.125 .001
Benefit and Renumeration .197 .163 .416 1.213 .249
Work Environment -.215 .349 -.348 -.618 .548

1
Trainings and Seminars .615 .359 .929 1.713 .112
Recognition -.141 .253 -.208 -.558 .587


variable.
Model Summary
Square Estimate
1 .820 a
.673 .525 .32054

Environment
variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 2.327 5 .465 4.530 .017c
1 Residual 1.130 11 .103
Total 3.457 16

Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 2.962 .621 4.768 .001
Work Environment .278 .581 .381 .478 .642

1
Trainings and Seminars .269 .495 .367 .542 .598
Recognition -.133 .212 -.180 -.626 .544


variable.
Model Summary
Square Estimate
1 .776 a
.602 .436 .28273

Environment
Educational Attainment as a moderator explains 60.2% of the variation on the values
on the dependent variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 1.450 5 .290 3.628 .031c
1 Residual .959 12 .080
Total 2.409 17

Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 2.649 .674 3.933 .002
Work Environment .045 .507 .063 .089 .931

1
Trainings and Seminars .456 .457 .633 .999 .338
Recognition -.165 .237 -.229 -.698 .498


variable.
IX.3 Absorption
Model Summary

Square Estimate
1 .413a .171 -.088 1.81857

Environment
Religion as a moderator explains 17.1% of the variation on the values on the
dependent variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 10.904 5 2.181 .659 .659c
1 Residual 52.915 16 3.307
Total 63.819 21
a. Dependent Variable: Absorption

Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 5.481 2.125 2.579 .020
Benefit and Renumeration .250 1.153 .152 .216 .831

1
Trainings and Seminars -.998 3.081 -.655 -.324 .750
Recognition .377 1.267 .245 .298 .770


variable.
Model Summary

Square Estimate
1 .353 a
.125 -.188 4.20708

Environment
variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 35.311 5 7.062 .399 .841c
1 Residual 247.794 14 17.700
Total 283.105 19

Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 5.633 1.706 3.301 .005
Work Environment 1.235 1.237 .944 .999 .335

1
Trainings and Seminars -1.570 1.158 -1.191 -1.356 .197
Recognition .606 .630 .458 .961 .353


variable.
Model Summary

Square Estimate
1 .584a
.341 .067 1.41315

dependent variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 12.418 5 2.484 1.244 .348c
1 Residual 23.964 12 1.997
Total 36.382 17

Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 6.402 1.423 4.499 .001

1
Trainings and Seminars -1.706 .806 -1.448 -2.116 .056
Recognition .334 .569 .277 .588 .567


variable.
Model Summary
Square Estimate
1 .350 a
.122 -.277 .91454

Environment
variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 1.283 5 .257 .307 .899c
1 Residual 9.200 11 .836
Total 10.483 16

Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 5.301 1.772 2.991 .012

1
Trainings and Seminars -1.170 1.414 -.919 -.828 .425
Recognition .493 .605 .384 .814 .433


variable.
Model Summary
Square Estimate
1 .371 a
.138 -.222 .78976

Environment
variable.
ANOVAa,b
Regression 1.194 5 .239 .383 .851c
1 Residual 7.485 12 .624
Total 8.678 17

Coefficientsa,b

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 5.678 1.882 3.018 .011

1
Trainings and Seminars -1.416 1.276 -1.034 -1.110 .289
Recognition .551 .661 .402 .833 .421


variable.

Results of The Statistical Analysis Religion

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Results of The Statistical Analysis Religion

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RESULTS OF THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

- Majority of the respondents (68.6%) are Roman Catholics.

II. Perceived level of organization support of nurses in the hospital

Mean 3.9052 3.72 3.74 3.73 3.47

Mean 4.6732 4.7865 4.2092

Interpretatio Not Not Significan Not

Interpretatio Not Not Not Significan Not

V. Association between the demographic profile and the Self-Efficacy

Chi-Square 191.427 334,883 447.251 29.491 24.161

p-value 0.104 0.507 0 0.388 0.673

Chi-Square 161.029 239.263 423.528 34.097 17.645

p-value 0.157 0.983 0 0.083 0.82

Chi-Square 201.611 358.781 401.243 37.814 32.896

p-value 0.303 0.818 0.036 0.221 0.423

VII. Relationship Between Self Efficacy and Work Engagement

VIII. Relationship between Work Engagement and Perceived Organizational Support

Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the

1 .302a .091 -.193 1.15889

a. Predictors: (Constant), LeadershipAndManagement, Benefit and

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 2.152 5 .430 .320 .893c

1 Residual 21.488 16 1.343

a. Dependent Variable: Vigor

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

(Constant) 4.383 1.354 3.237 .005

Benefit and Renumeration -.069 .734 -.069 -.094 .926

Work Environment .494 1.918 .533 .258 .800

Recognition .075 .807 .080 .093 .927

LeadershipAndManagement -.119 .246 -.260 -.483 .636

a. Dependent Variable: Vigor

- Based on the corresponding p-values of each 5 independent variables, it has been

Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the

1 .669a .448 .251 1.70106

a. Predictors: (Constant), LeadershipAndManagement, Benefit and

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 32.856 5 6.571 2.271 .104c

1 Residual 40.511 14 2.894

a. Dependent Variable: Vigor

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

(Constant) 4.606 .690 6.676 .000

Benefit and Renumeration -.419 .228 -.725 -1.836 .088

Work Environment 1.083 .500 1.626 2.167 .048

Recognition .179 .255 .265 .702 .494

LeadershipAndManagement -.174 .108 -.363 -1.615 .129

a. Dependent Variable: Vigor

- Based on the corresponding p-values of each 5 independent variables, it has been

Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the

a. Predictors: (Constant), LeadershipAndManagement, Recognition,

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 6.640 5 1.328 3.189 .046c

1 Residual 4.997 12 .416

a. Dependent Variable: Vigor

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

(Constant) 4.729 .650 7.277 .000

Benefit and Renumeration -.441 .167 -.924 -2.644 .021

Work Environment 1.146 .358 1.838 3.205 .008

Recognition .098 .260 .144 .379 .711

LeadershipAndManagement -.167 .112 -.311 -1.497 .160

a. Dependent Variable: Vigor

- Based on the corresponding p-values of each 5 independent variables, it has been