Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EARTH SCIENCES
ABSTRACT
Keywords: water, hydrous phase, subducting slab, transition zone, lower mantle, hydrogen-bond
symmetrization, core–mantle boundary
C The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original
work is properly cited.
REVIEW Ohtani 225
Table 1. Summary of the water contents in the mantle deduced by geophysical observations.
local regions, and the average water content may mogeneous and the normal mantle represented by
be different due to heterogeneity in the mantle. the depleted mantle of the MORB source is gener-
The water contents in Earth’s interior estimated ally dry, with ∼100 ppm or less of water, whereas
by geophysical observations are summarized in the OIB source mantle is wet, with water contents
Table 1. Extensive studies have agreed that the tran- of ∼0.075 wt.%.
sition zone is a major water reservoir, but the water On the other hand, the water content in subduct-
storage in the lower mantle is poorly constrained. ing slabs descending in the upper mantle is estimated
The water contents summarized in Table 1 indicate to be 1–2 wt.% [3] based on the water content in
that the upper mantle, mantle transition zone and hydrous phases. Thus, slabs can carry H2 O into
lower mantle contain 0.04, 0.2–1 and <2 oceans of the mantle, which can affect geodynamics, such as
water, respectively. Here, we discuss the various pro- seismicity, subduction processes, ascending plumes
cesses related to water in the upper mantle, transi- and magmatisms such as island arc volcanism,
tion zone, lower mantle and the core–mantle bound- intraplate magmatism, hot spots and oceanic ridge
ary, such as the water distribution, hydrous minerals magmatism. The average normal upper mantle is
and their O–H bonding nature, and the effects of generally dry, as shown above, but the subducting
water in the seismic anomalies and mantle dynamics. slabs can carry a significant amount of water, in
which two-thirds of the water dehydrates and
generates magmas and triggers seismicity, whereas
ROLE OF WATER IN THE UPPER MANTLE the rest can be stored in slabs and further carried
AND THE MANTLE TRANSITION ZONE into the deep mantle [3].
Water in the upper mantle
The water content stored in the upper mantle es-
A low-velocity region at the bottom of the
timated by various methods is shown in Table 1. upper mantle
Electrical conductivity data suggest the normal up- Seismological studies reported the existence of low-
per mantle is essentially dry and its water content is velocity regions at the bottom of the upper man-
less than 100 ppm [4] or ∼100 ppm [5]. The average tle (∼410-km depth) beneath Japan and north-
water content in olivine, orthopyroxene and clinopy- east China [9], Europe [10] and the USA [11].
roxene in the Udachinaya peridotite xenolith has These regions might be caused by the existence
been reported as 1–64 ppm [6], although a high wa- of dense, volatile-rich magmas (e.g. [12]). Fig. 1
ter content 300 ppm of olivine due to metasomatism shows the phase and melting relations of wet peri-
is reported in the same xenolith [7]. The water con- dotite at high pressure and temperature [13,14].
tents in the MORB (mid-oceanic ridge basalt) and This figure shows a kink in the solidus curve near
OIB (ocean island basalt) source mantles are esti- the 410-km discontinuity. This kink could be caused
mated to be 0.01 and 0.075 wt.%, respectively, based by the olivine–wadsleyite transformation with the
on the H2 O/Ce ratio in basalt glasses [8]. These es- water-solubility contrast between the two phases.
timations indicate that the upper mantle is not ho- Dehydration melting of plumes ascending from the
226 Natl Sci Rev, 2020, Vol. 7, No. 1 REVIEW
Temperature (K)
α β
γ existence of crust components
1800 rm
the
geo ater Sb
M ant
le
30 w
t.% w Recycling of the crustal components has been in-
1400 E tensively studied in tectonics, geochemistry, petrol-
Amp
A
D ogy and geodynamics (e.g. [17,18]). The slabs are
Serp
1000 10Å mainly composed of lithospheric components such
as harzburgites, basalts, and continental and oceanic
0 10 20
Pressure (GPa) sediments [19].
(a) (b) Depth (km) a low density relative to the surrounding mantle
100 200 300 400 500
35
4.1 and move upwards due to buoyancy, continuous
Partial molar volume of CO2 Density of mantle model, ak-135
descent of the slabs causes dehydration, which
Partial molar volume (cm3/mol)
Density (g/cm3)
25 Magma-2 wt.%H2O
3.5 between the transition zone and the lower mantle,
20 CO2
3.3
even in the absence of dense magmas.
K=8.1(3) Dry magma
15
K’= 7.2(1) 3.1 Magma-8 wt.%H2O The idea that hydrous magmas containing
10 H2O Magma-5 wt.%CO2 2∼8 wt.% H2 O are denser than the surrounding
2.9
K=0.7(4)
5 K’=7.7(11)
mantle along the normal mantle temperature
2.7
estimated by Sakamaki [32] may contradict with
0 2.5
0 5 10 15 20 25
Pressure (GPa)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Pressure (GPa)
14 16 18 20 the melting and phase relations of hydrous CMAS
(CaO–MgO–Al2 O3 –SiO2 ) pyrolite [13] and
Brg: (MgSiO3)0.93A0.06M0.01
D(Al2O3) ~ 13.8
1000
Srp
D H D(Al2O3) ~ 22.8 ids generated by this process can hydrate the sur-
10A
rounding mantle at the base of the lower man-
D: H0.6δ0.1S0.3
Dias-
pore
Brg: (MgSiO4)0.98A0.01S0.01 tle and hydrated regions may create LLSVP (large
D(Al2O3) ~ 15.8
low shear velocity province). The dehydration of
500
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 δ-AlO2 H occurs at ∼2400 K [25,37] at the base
Pressure (GPa) of the lower mantle, and dissolution of phase H
component (MgSi)O4 H2 further lowers the decom-
Figure 3. The stability fields of phase H, phase δ, δ-H solid solution, phase D. The position temperature [40], whereas pyrite FeO2 H
compositions of the hydrous phases and coexisting bridgmanite/post-perovskite (ppv) seems to decompose to post-perovskite Fe2 O3 and
and the partition coefficients of Al2 O3 between the phases, D(Al2 O3 ), at high pressure
fluid at higher temperatures >2500 K [39], although
and temperature conditions (stars), are given in this figure [59]. The compositions of
the phase boundary is not yet determined precisely.
the coexisting δ-H and bridgmanite/post-perovskite are given as molar fractions of the
following components: H, MgSiO4 H2 ; δ, Al2 O4 H2 ; (MgSiO3 ), MgSiO3 ; A, Al2 O3 ; S, SiO2 ; Thus, the fluids generated by the decomposition of
M, MgO. A gray shaded region and a gray arrow are the normal mantle and the cold the δ-H solid solution may react with iron from the
slab geotherms, respectively. The stability field of δ-H solid solutions (H0.23 δ 0.56 Si0.02 core to create an iron hydrate FeO2 Hx , which can
and H0.15 δ 0.73 S0.12 ) are shown as broken curves in this figure. Wd, wadsleyite; Rw, ring- cause the seismic anomaly of the ULVZ (ultralow ve-
woodite; δ-H, hydrous δ-H solid solution; Brg, bridgmanite; PPv, post-perovskite; Sb, locity zone), as was suggested by Liu et al. [51] and
superhydrous phase B; D, hydrous phase D; Srp, serpentine; 10A, hydrous 10 Å phase; Yuan et al. [52]. The processes expected at the bot-
A, hydrous phase A. tom of the mantle are schematically shown in Fig. 5.
230 Natl Sci Rev, 2020, Vol. 7, No. 1 REVIEW
works summarized in this paper. I also appreciate W. McDonough 14. Zhang Y, Wang C and Jin Z et al. Partial melting of stagnant
of Tohoku University for his constructive comments on this oceanic lithosphere in the mantle transition zone and its geo-
subject. physical implications. Lithos 2017; 92–93: 379–87.
15. Sakamaki T, Ohtani E and Urakawa S et al. Density of carbon-
ated peridotite magma at high pressure using an X-ray absorp-
FUNDING tion method. Am Mineral 2011; 96: 553–7.
This work was supported by KAKENHI from JSPS (15H05748) 16. Bajgain S, Ghosh DB and Karki BB. Structure and density of
to E.O. A part of this work was performed under the con- basaltic melts at mantle conditions from first-principles simu-
tracts of the SPring-8 (2017B1514, 2018A1425, 2018A1447 and lations. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 8578,
2018B1326). 17. Ringwood AE, Kesson SE and Hibberson W et al. Origin of kim-
berlites and related magmas. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1992; 113:
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
521–38.
32. Sakamaki T. Density of hydrous magma. Chem Geol 2017; 475: 135–9. 53. Hu Q, Kim DY and Yang W et al. FeO2 and FeO2 H under deep lower-
33. Katsura T, Yoneda A and Yamazaki D et al. Adiabatic temperature profile in the mantle conditions and Earth’s oxygen–hydrogen cycles. Nature 2016; 534:
mantle. Phys Earth Planet Inter 2010; 183: 212–8. 241–4.
34. da Silva CRS, Wentzcovitch RM and Patel A et al. The composition and 54. Hu Q, Kim DY and Liu J et al. Dehydrogenation of goethite in Earth’s deep lower
geotherm of the lower mantle: constraints from the elasticity of silicate per- mantle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017; 114: 1498–501.
ovskite. Phys Earth Planet Inter 2000; 118: 103–9. 55. Nishi M, Irifune T and Tsuchiya J et al. Stability of hydrous silicate at high
35. Spiliopoulos S and Stacy FD. The Earth’s thermal profile: is there a mid-mantle pressures and water transport to the deep lower mantle, Nat Geosci 2014; 7:
thermal boundary layer? J Geodyn 1984; 1: 61–77. 224–7.
36. Ohtani E. Water in the mantle. Elements 2005; 1: 25–30. 56. Dziewonski AM and Anderson DL. Preliminary reference earth model. Phys
37. Duan Y, Sun N and Wang S et al. Phase stability and thermal equation of state Earth Planet Inter 1981; 25: 297–356.
of δ-AlOOH: implication for water transportation to the deep lower mantle. 57. Mao H-K, Hu Q and Yang L et al. When water meets iron at Earth’s core-mantle
Earth Planet Sci Lett 2018; 494: 92–8. boundary. Natl Sci Rev 2017; 4: 870–8.