Model IELTS Essay June 2018 & 2022

While it is thought that adolescents ought to focus on a broad range of school subjects,
others feel it would be better for them to concentrate only on chosen subjects. I believe the
number of subjects they study should depend on their age.

One reason adolescents from around the age of 13 to 17 ought to focus on learning as
many different subjects as possible is that they are too immature to make serious
decisions that will affect their future. By studying various subjects, they will develop
a clearer understanding of their skills and interests, which often change as a child
ages. Secondly, teenagers need to vary what they learn to help them develop into
well rounded adults. For example, they need sport to encourage health, they need
maths to be able to perform simple arithmetic in life, and they need languages to help
them learn communication. At a young age they are not mature enough to be
responsible for their own development.
However, by the age of 18, adolescents know not only what subjects they most enjoy or excel
at, but also which subjects are most useful for their future prospects in life. For this
reason, the majority of university applicants are 18 years old, and they are eager to engage
more deeply in specific subject matter. Furthermore, their ability to concentrate on one specific
subject and study in depth is fully established at that age, unlike when they were younger.
Lastly, older adolescents have the ability to manage their own schedule and can take
responsibility for continuing art or sport as hobbies.
To conclude, younger teenagers are not ready to specialise and require a broad
framework of subjects to help them develop, but at the age of 18, this is no longer
the case.
Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that,
in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss
both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people argue that courses in history should be a top priority in the school curriculum,
whereas others claim that nowadays courses related to science and technology are of greater
importance than history courses. I agree with the latter opinion because those who focus
on disciplines related to science and technology can earn higher salaries in the future.

On the one hand, it can be argued that courses in history can foster patriotism in the young.
This is because by taking these courses, young people can know that without their
ancestors’ sacrifice and hard work, they would not be able to live the type of lifestyle they are
living now. As a result, they will love their country more and want to give back to their country.
However, I think history courses do not equip students with the hard skills needed to
contribute to their nation, which makes patriotism useless.

On the other hand, students who put much effort into courses in science and technology will
have a better chance of securing high-paying positions in the future. The reason is that
these courses train their ability to innovate, and with this ability, they will be able to bring
innovation to their future employers. Their employers in turn will reward them with high salaries.
For example, even entry-level software engineers at Facebook get paid 166, 000 dollars a year.
I agree with this argument because getting a well-paid job after graduation is the main reason
why most people go to school.

In conclusion, while courses in history can turn students into patriots, I believe subjects related
to science and technology are more important because they help students get high-
paying jobs.

It is better for the students to live away from the home during their university
studies rather than staying with their parents. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?

IELTS Model Essay Feb 2017 While some people think that students ought to live alone
whilst studying at university, it is believed by others that it is better for them to remain
living at home. In my opinion, I think students benefit from living alone unless their
finances prevent it.
Firstly, one of the main reasons why it is advantageous for students to live alone is
that they become totally independent of their parents and able to think for themselves.
University is a time for students to spread their wings and try new ideas or ways of
thinking and learn to cope with making life changing decisions. By living alone,
without the influence of their parents, they develop rounder, decisive characters able to
function well in the world.
Another advantage to students fleeing the parental nest is that they learn to
manage money. Most students see university as a stepping stone to
adulthood and so by learning to live on a budget, they develop the skills
needed once they are earning a salary and balancing their finances. Renting
property also comes with responsibilities to both landlords and housemates, and
this is a further lesson to learn in useful life skills.
Finally, however, regardless of how beneficial living alone might be for university
students, it might be financially impractical for some. For a small proportion of
university students, their finances might require them to stay at home for as long as
possible until they are finally able to support themselves through paid work.
In conclusion, while it might not be feasible for all students, living away from parents
helps university students develop strength of character and useful life skills
needed for when they enter working life.

Essay Template 15 Argument: Some people think distance-learning can replace

schools. Do you agree?
With the development of modern technologies, the Internet is advancing at an amazing
speed in present-day society. But when it comes to whether distance-learning can
replace schools, people hold conflicting views. In my mind, distance-learning can never
replace schools. Schools definitely have more advantages than e-learning. The primary
advantage of schools is that traditional face-to-face learning cultivates students’
communication skills. It is universally believed that a person’s communication skills are
of vital importance in the contemporary world; thus, students have to learn
communication skills well at school. Another advantage of schools is that teachers are
able to cater for students’ different needs in the classroom. We all agree that when
teachers can see students in the classroom, it is easier for teachers to identify students’
needs and take actions accordingly. Last but not least, schools provide students with a
healthy environment to expand their network. One need only look at the value of sitting
in the same classroom for years to see the value of friendships developed at school. I
admit that e-learning gives students more convenience so that students can learn
knowledge and skills at home. Nevertheless, e-learning does not offer any other real
benefits except its convenience. Based on this point, distance-learning should not
replace schools. In summary, online education may have certain merits, but schools can
never be replaced by e-learning. I am convinced that schools will keep offering great
value in the future.