Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chhai Tann
#001226392
February 9, 2020
MedImmune Inc. makes use of three different means of marketing research to determine if
the two vaccines generate profit for the company. The first method is to survey the population.
Cameroon is a poorly developed country that does not have advanced infrastructure set up to
utilize modern technology. Because of this, gathering marketing data must rely primarily on
surveys. Primary data is gathered directly from participating correspondents. Representatives are
selected to represent the country’s demographics, from each aspect of society. Regardless of
whether probability or nonprobability sampling is used, in-person interviews are the best option.
MedImmune’s sales team can gather in-depth information about the demographics of the
Cameroonian population. There are glaring flaws, however. First, it is the most expensive as a
huge amount of time and resources is dedicated to seeking individuals who live in poverty-
stricken conditions. Second, a large amount of bias can occur depending on the interviewer in
question. Lastly, sampling can be skewed due to individuals who register as not present for an
interview.
The second method is the direct observation. This is effective in gauging the current status
of the market in Cameroon before the company implements its marketing strategies.
MedImmune can utilize a little bit of technological infrastructure that Cameroon does have to
record the purchasing behavior of the population. Research by Wells and Lo Sciuto (1966)
shows that “The principal advantage of direct observation is that when it is done well it produces
a highly detailed, nearly complete record of what people actually do.” If MedImmune notes that
consumers purchase vaccines if a certain set of conditions are met, then they will use that data to
adjust their marketing strategy to suit those conditions. The downside with this method, however,
is that it is also subject to bias much like with surveys.
The third method is focus groups. This form of research is most effective for getting the
opinions of different segments of the market, from consumers to suppliers. It consists of a panel
that has members from all sections of the market. The researcher moderates a discussion between
the members and obtains information from them about certain issues, in this case, about the
newly introduced vaccines. The major advantage of this method over the other two, according to
Then et al. (2014), “The focus group method may also decrease the bias of individual
interviews”. A lack of bias means that the generated data is neutral and provides a centered look
at how the market operates and how to best approach the opinions of its various segments. The
disadvantage of focus groups is that it requires a highly skilled moderator that can help eliminate
bias, meaning that MedImmune has to invest in hiring skilled researchers.
A1b. Competitive Advantage
MedImmune Inc. will have a competitive advantage of being the first company to offer
vaccines for dengue fever and HIV. Its main competitors in the vaccine manufacturing business
are Dynavax Technologies, Emergent BioSolutions, GSK Vaccines, Merck & Co, PaxVax,
Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, Seqirus USA, and Valneva. Unlike those companies, MedImmune enjoys
the benefits of brand loyalty and a constant drive for innovation that differentiates it from others.
This includes creating brand new vaccines for new diseases like dengue fever and AIDS. Dengue
fever is a common viral infection spread by mosquitoes. It is common in African countries such
as Cameroon. Similarly, AIDS is another viral infection most commonly found in the region. It is
caused by HIV. Unlike dengue fever, HIV is transmitted through direct contact with infected
bodily fluids. Neither virus has any vaccines or drugs to combat their debilitating illnesses.
MedImmune aims to change that with its new products. The vaccines will benefit from the
company’s segmentation strategy, something that MedImmune’s competitors are lacking.
Through data gathered on the demographics of Cameroon, MedImmune will be a leader in the
market through product uniqueness.
Penetration based pricing is the best strategy to get MedImmune’s HIV and dengue fever
vaccines to establish a foothold in the global marketplace. Penetration pricing is a marketing
strategy used to entice customers to a new product or service by initially offering a low price.
This helps the new product or service penetrate the market and attract customers away from
competitors, leading to increased awareness. The goal is to get customers to try a new product
and build market share with the hope of gaining their loyalty once prices rise back to normal.
The HIV vaccine, for example, will start at a low price of $200 per dose while the dengue fever
vaccine will be $120 per dose for new customers. Established customers can expect to pay $400
per dose for HIV and $240 for dengue fever, double the initial asking price.
A4a. Costs
The costs associated with developing and manufacturing vaccines involves multiple
processes. Gouglas et al (2018) suggest that the cost of researching and developing a single
vaccine from the preclinical phase to phase 2 ranges between $31 million to $68 million US
dollars if no failures occur. In the real world, costs are estimated to be around $137 million to
$1.1 billion. The estimate accounts for the cumulative cost of failed vaccines generated during
the process. Adding the cumulative costs for multiple vaccines and the total amount spent
dramatically expands to $8.4 billion.
MedImmune will utilize a push promotional strategy for its new vaccines in Cameroon. It
makes use of the company's sales force and trade promotion activities to create consumer
demand for a product. Push marketing strategies are usually used to gain product exposure. In
this case, MedImmune is trying to establish a presence in the Cameroonian vaccine market so a
push strategy is needed. The benefit of a push strategy is that MedImmune can track demand as
needed and create a cost advantage, otherwise known as an economy of scale.
References
C., ... & Røttingen, J. A. (2018). Estimating the cost of vaccine development against
epidemic infectious diseases: a cost minimisation study. The Lancet Global Health, 6(12),
e1386-e1396.