Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEASURES IN AAD
INTRODUCTION
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) popularly known as ‘Drones’, have transformed the manner in
which military force is applied. Drones have come a long way from their initial uses for
surveillance to electronic warfare system and carrying aircraft ordnance such as missiles
making them a potent weapon system. Rapid technological advances resulting a new breed of
drones with vastly greater prowess than their predecessors by harnessing the power of
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and swarming ability. What gradually emerged were the ‘drone
swarms’ where hundreds or thousands of small unmanned aerial vehicles were programmed
to take on a target.
Rapid development in such small size drone applications is due to their relatively low
production and operating costs in comparison to manned systems. In addition to it they are
highly mobile and can be rapidly deployed into combat, stealthy in nature, offers no loss of life,
platforms and navigation systems makes them ideal weapon system for complex missions and
targets.
SWARM is an acronym which stands for Smart War fighting Array of Reconfigurable Modules.
In context of the drone, the group of drones having ability to operate independently as well as
collaborative behaviour as exhibited by birds and insects. They can be launched from land, air,
sea, running autonomously or with human control, engaging multiple targets with pinpoint
accuracy, with sizes ranging from just a few inches to several feet across. Technology today
2
allows them to fly together based on their own pre-fed intelligence and without any
dependence on the traditional ground control station. These swarms can achieve far more
complex tasks than single entities, precisely because they synchronise individual systems to
operate as a collective with a common goal. Drone swarms can defeat any existing weapon
system, and can deliver enough precision and coordinated firepower through large numbers of
expendable drones to cause destruction on a massive scale. Their impact could rival the
development of the machine-gun; anyone without their own drone swarm faces rapid defeat on
the battlefield.
When smart drones operate in swarms, traditional air defence systems are often unable to
counter this threat, rendering vital military and civil installations at risk of either espionage or
physical attack. The threat perceived from swarm drones is not futuristic. In 2018, two Russian
military bases in Syria were swarmed by thirteen armed drones, also in 2019, oil fields in Saudi
Arabia were hit by Houthi rebels using a combination of eighteen swarm drones and cruise
missiles. While these attacks involved relatively unsophisticated systems, the continuous
improvement in AI capabilities points to far greater risks in the future. The Russians launched
their top of the line Pantzir S Surface to Air Missile (unit cost of the system is $13.15 -14.67
million USD) to kill the seemingly crude drones proving the point that how a disproportionate
cost can be slapped on the defender by such cheap machines. Destroying multimillion-dollar
eqpt or aircraft with a few $1,000 drones is a cost equation any adversary would want.
What makes a swarm of drones superior to past technology is the fact that the drones can
communicate with one another to adjust the behaviour of the entire swarm in response to real-
time information collected from sensors on the drones in the swarm and can confuse and
overwhelm an opponent's defences. Drone swarms could engage targets across a relatively
wide area like staging Area, convoys, parked aircrafts, communication centre, ammunition and
fuel dumps, and much more. Many global agencies are working on systems where thousands
3
of drones could operate in synchronisation, fitted with missiles or warheads capable of carrying
sophisticated attacks and overwhelm enemy defences with their sheer numbers. As the threat
of asymmetric warfare grows, acquiring intelligent swarm drone capabilities has become
TASKS / EMP
The way swarms of drones can be employed and tasks likely to be assigned in combat are
listed as under:-
(a) Surveillance. Positioned over the area of interest and tasked to deliver
uninterrupted and continuous information about the designated area. Every individual
drone in the swarm will have ability to produce its own output. Technology allows the
fusion of inputs from multiple drones sensor into one comprehensive picture of a large
(b) Target Designation and Engagement . Drones equipped with cameras and other
sensors can identify potential targets, and relay that information to the rest of the
swarm. A weapon-equipped drone may then manoeuvre, approach and strike the target
(c) Suppression of Enemy Air Defence. At the operational and strategic levels, the
priority tasks will be penetration and neutralisation of enemy air defence system,
destruction of essential military and state assets. Only a small amount of explosives and
radars, surveillance devices, and control system on missiles and aircraft. Damaging
used to generate precisely-timed false radar returns that create the illusion of a radar
- It allows dispersed combat power, which in turns forces the enemy to expend more
munitions.
Swarm drones have a tremendous edge in having a ‘mind of their own’. Once
programmed, these miniature warriors are capable of taking decisions, take default
actions where no orders exist or where there is ambiguity and possess the capability to
Drone swarms are the upcoming threat Air Defence planners are grappling with. The
conventional air defence systems is based on the integration of sensors like radars, electro-
optical systems, shooters like aircrafts, air defence guns, missiles and Command and control
system. Every sensor has a peak limit of how many targets it can track at a time and every
shooter has a limit on the maximum number of targets it can possible engage at one time.
The issue involves not just air defence against one or two drones, but against a count of
hundred or thousand drones coming in from different directions at nearly the same time. Such
saturation attacks have the potential to overwhelm standard Air Defence systems, even if the
The prime reason for failure of traditional air defence systems against drone swarm is that they
are generally designed for use against large, fast moving targets and not drones swarms.
Impracticality of using Air Defence systems in counter swarm role is another factor which
inhibits their use against drones. After all, using a missile which may cost thousands of dollars
against a drone bought off-the-shelf for less than $100 is not the best way to use Air Defence
systems.
DEALING WITH THE SWARM. It’s not going to be easy for a military force to defend against
a swarm of more than a hundred drones. A kinetic type of defence involving missiles, gun sys
having high rate of fire, anti-drone drones, and machine guns will never be perfect against
swarm. Countering drone swarm can be broken down into two problem subheads.
possible counteraction or elimination. These drone swarms are relatively slow moving aerial
vehicles and by virtue of their numbers present a target which can be detected by a suitably
radars, the Electro-Optical (EO) sensor systems complement the radar solution ideally. In that,
if the radar is jammed or the radar cannot see the target for any reason like target lies in the
radar shadow/ radar dead zone etc, the EO systems are likely to detect the target.
The ground based surveillance provided by the integral early warning and fire control radars of
air defence weapon system, could be backed with airborne surveillance (through Airborne
Warning and Control System or AWACS). Algorithms are used to distinguish between drones
COUNTERING THE SWARM. To arrive at what will be requisite capabilities of system for
countering drone swarm. The swarm drone kill system must be an ‘area defence’ system. The
engagement of drones must not be restricted to a limited numbers, it must surround the whole
airspace being used by the swarm. The ideal weapons to counter the drone swarms are the
‘soft kill’ weapons. Such weapons target the swarms along the following vulnerabilities:-
(a) Electronic Counter Measures. The best defense against drone swarms might
communication links of the drones in swarm with the operators or control system
complex drone swarms, provided the targeted swarms are using satellite navigation.
Once the swarms are detected by sensors and its coordinates are available the
Spoofing system would alter the drones Global Positioning System receiver by
(c) Direct Energy Weapons. With a specifically shaped antenna or emitter, the
energy can be focused to produce effects within a confined area and limited range.
Under certain circumstances such weapons could ideally complement the other
broadcasts a broad swath of microwave radiation, frying any drones in its path like a
(e) Laser. Using killer laser waves to impinge on the miniature drones. However these
systems also have limitation of handling a finite number of drones by tracking each
swarm of drones. The United States (US) Naval Postgraduate School has already
swarm in offensive and defensive role, the result was a tie. Besides US, China is
INDIA’S INITIATIVE
The State-run Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) has tie up with a Bengaluru based
start-up New Space Research and Technologies, which designs and develops
‘Persistence Drones’ (implying long endurance drones) for the purpose of observation
going by the name of ALFA-S (Air Launched Flexible Asset - Swarm). The system
consists of small drones 1-2 meters long and capable of carrying 1.5 tonnes of
explosives. The drones have foldable wings & stealthy features. Due to their small size,
Jaguar. They can propel upto 100 km/h. When in flight, the drones are connected to
the mother aircraft through infrared and electro-optical two-way data secured data link.
Once deployed by the manned aircraft, the drones scout for targets of opportunity.
These could be any type of designated vulnerable areas, Air Defence weapon sites and
so on. Once the target is acquired, it is destroyed by the drones in the suicidal mode of
In the 21st century, drone swarms have emerged as a potent force and are looked upon
as true Force Multipliers with the ability to share information among themselves and
delivering precision strikes on targets of choice. The evolving swarm threat poses a
significant challenge to all military forces at the tactical, operational and strategic level. The
trend of drone swarm proliferation is clear and countering this threat must be addressed when
8
planning any operation where enemy forces have the potential to successfully employ drone
- Focus on the threat of drone swarms against military bases, especially air
bases, where a single drone can do a lot of damage against multi-million dollar
countermeasures.
The future of drone is rapidly moving towards AI, miniaturisation, weaponisation and multiple
mission employment. What will be the real difference maker for the future drone swarm is
increasing their autonomy, thus reducing their vulnerability to external countermeasures, add
artificial intelligence to their capabilities and all of sudden defending against drone swarms
becomes even more difficult. Drone swarms because of the offensive–defensive dynamic
present a force to reckon with in future and merit detailed analysis of the threat perception and
the means of countering it. Army Air Defence warriors need to include drone swarm in the
present and future threat spectrum and devise ways and means to counter this highly potent