Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jakarta, Indonesia
Email: www.iqbalrizki@gmail.com
Abstract
Employee performance is one of the main things that need to be considered in the company.
To get the desired target for the company, of course, it takes good performance from the
employees. one of the factors that influence employee performance is work motivation. The
purpose of this paper is to determine the effect of work motivation on employee performance.
Several previous studies have shown that work motivation has a positive effect on employee
performance
In a company, human resource potential is basically one of the capital and plays the most
important role in achieving organizational goals. Therefore, organizations need to manage
human resources as well as possible, because the key to the success of an organization is not
only the technological superiority of the availability of funds but the human factor is the most
important factor.
According to Wibowo (2015: 322) motivation is an impetus for a series of human behavior
processes in achieving goals.
According to Afandi (2016) performance is the extent to which a person has played a part in
implementing organizational strategy, both in achieving specific goals related to individual
roles and by showing competencies that are declared relevant to the organization.
Literature Review
Work motivation
Here are some expert opinions regarding work motivation, including those stated by:
According to Hasibuan (2016: 141) motivation is what causes, channels and supports human
behavior, so that they are willing to work hard and enthusiastically to achieve optimal results.
According to Tegar (2019) motivation is a process of explaining the intensity, direction and
persistence of an individual to achieve his goals.
Riyanto et al (2017) Motivation is aimed only at human resource management in general and
subordinates in particular. Based on the above understanding, it can be concluded that work
motivation encourages employees of an organization to work together and use their abilities
to achieve organizational goals.
1) Promotion
Promotion is the progress of an employee on a better task, whether viewed from the point of
view of heavier responsibility, higher dignity or status, better skills and especially additional
payment of wages or salaries.
2) Job Performance
The starting point of a person's career development is his work achievement to do the tasks
entrusted to him now.
4) Awards
Giving awards for their achievements, recognition of their expertise will trigger passion for
employees
5) Responsibility
Responsibility for the tasks assigned by the company fulfills the obligations to employees and
employees carry out tasks as expected by the company.
6) Confession
This recognition can encourage employees to have advantages in their fields to do better.
7) Success at work
Success in work can motivate employees to be more enthusiastic in carrying out the tasks
assigned by the company.
According to Maslow's hierarchical theory in Irham Fahmi's (2016) book, the dimensions and
indicators of motivation are:
2) The need for security: guarantees the safety of workers' environment and protection
against work risks
3) The need to be accepted by the group: the relationship between fellow employees and the
relationship between employees and leaders
Factors - Factors that affect employee performance According to Kasmir (2016) the factors
that affect performance are:
2) Knowledge
Someone who has good job knowledge will give good work results
3) Work Design
The job design will make it easier for employees to achieve their goals
4) Personality
5) Work Motivation
6) Leadership
The behavior of a leader in managing, managing and ordering his subordinates to carry out
the assigned tasks and responsibilities
7) Leadership Style
8) Organizational Culture
9) Job Satisfaction
11) Loyalty
12) Commitment
The dimensions and performance indicators used in this study adapt the theory expressed by
Deassler (2011) which states that there are six dimensions and indicators in measuring and
assessing employee performance based on their competence:
a. Quality, which is the level where the performance results of employees are performed
perfectly in the sense of accuracy, thoroughness and acceptance of an activity.
d. Reability, which is the level at which an employee can be trusted while completing work
and in terms of work follow-up.
e. Avaibility, namely the level of timeliness of an activity completed by the employee and
accuracy in the employee attendance record.
f. Independence, which is the level at which an employee can do work without the assistance
of employee guidance.
Conclusion
Judging from the theoretical theory, experts say that work motivation has a positive effect on
employee performance and some researchers who have conducted this research also state that
work motivation has a significant effect on employee performance.
References
Afandi, P. (2016). Concept & Indicator of Human Resource Management For Management
Research. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Fahmi, I. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Hasibuan, M. S. (2016). Manajemen : Dasar, Pengertian, dan Masalah, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta:
Bumi Aksara.
Kasmir. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori dan Praktik)-Cetakan Kesatu.
Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Riyanto, S. (2020). The Effect of Work Motivation, Organizational Commitment, and Job
Satisfaction on the contract Employees Performance of Pt Bank Rakyat Indonesia
Branch Office of Jakarta Daan Mogot. International Journal of Innovative Science and
Research Technology.Volume 5, Issue 1, January – 2020.
Sagala, S. (2017). Human Capital Membangun Modal Sumber Daya Manusia Berkarakter
Unggul Melalui Pendidikan Berkualitas (edisi pertaman). Kencana. Depok 16457.
Tegar, N. (2019). Manajemen SDM dan Karyawan Strategi Pengelolaan SDM dan Karyawan
dengan pendekatan Teoritis dan Praktis. Yogyakarta: Quadrant.
Wibowo. (2015). Manajemen Kinerja Edisi Kelima. Depok: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Yugusna. (2016). Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan demokratis dan lingkungan kerja terhadap
kinerja dan kedisiplinan karyawan (studi empiris pada perusahaan SPBU 44.501.29
randu garut semarang). Journal Of Management, 2 (2), 1–23.