Tele: 011- 23018523 Engineer -in- Chief's Branch Fax: 011-23019109 Military Enginner Services Dte of Works E4 (U) Sub Dte of Utility Kashmir House, Rajaji Marg New Delhi-110011 No.86440/Misc/Policy/E4 (U3) 2% May 2019 E-in-C’s List ‘A’ 1. Ref the following Policy letters issued by this HQ :- (a) HQletter No, 61748/PL/E4 (U) dt 06 Jun 2014. (©) HQ letter No, 86435/Misc/E4 (U3) dt 19 May 2017, (c) HQ letter No. 86440/Misc/Policy/E4 (U3) dt 01 June 2018. (d) HQ letter No. 62888/Gen-Misc Corres/E-4 dt 20 Aug 2018 2. _Itis noticed that the DPRs of sewer network and STP are forwarded directly to this HQ through the consultants and in many cases itis found that detailed scrutiny is not done at CE Zone level. itis once again requested that before forwarding the DPR to this HQ, proper scrutiny to be done at CE Zone level and certificate duly signed by Dir E/M / Dir Pig as per our instruction at para 1 (b) will be forwarded. No DPR to be forward through consultant. 3. Plack. (Abhishek Goel) Col Dir (PHE) Encls:- As Above For E-in-C Copy to: E2W (PPC) E-in-C Br “-KGtomation Cell {for uploading on MES Website E-in-C Bral Tole: 23016708 E ‘Sub Dte of Utility (Ed) _.. Fax 23019113 Dte of Works, “e-wtuil;tdg.e4@amail.com E-in-C’s Branch Integrated HO of MoD (Army), ‘litary Engineer Services Kashmir House, Rajaji Mara, - New Delhi 10011 61748/PL/E4(U) Ob vune 2014 List ‘A’ &'B’ AMENDMENTS TO MESS] ANDIHG ORDSAS(1995 EDITION) 1. Further to amendments issued vide this HO lelter No 61748/PL/E4(U) Dt os: Jun 2003,to Para 60.7 of MES Standing orders. 2. Following amendments are further issued to ibid letter:- For - All schemes of eleciic sunply, water supply, sewage disposal, fire fighting and central air condtioning wil be submitted to followhng engineer authorities for prior technical sorutiny. Vetting of central sewage system and ccontral sir conditioning system by 2G qualfied officer of respective field of ‘specialization and vetting of fre fighting sahomas'by Fire adviser of Ministry of Defence must be ensured whatever applicable:- {@) Schemes costing upto Fis #2 Lacs Owe (b) Schemes costing from 22 Lacs unin 120 Lacs = CE Zone (6) Schemes costing over Bs 120 ace + Eine BEAD All original scheinss of atdotric supply, water supply, sewage ‘lsposai firefighting and ceviral air conditioning will be submitied (0 following engineer authorities for olor tachnion sorutiny. Vatting cf fre fighting schemes by Fire y ofDetence must Bs. ensured ,whersver {) Schemes costing upto #259 Luce fof Schemas costing trom 50 lacs upto 260 Lens Ao} Schemes costing from 2801 ac upto 500 Lacs 7, daltny Wks Only) AG) Schatnes costing over fs 100 Lacs (Army Wis), and AF= ( Tal: 01123018303 ‘Sub Dig of Usity (E4) Fax: 011 23019113 Die of Werks, Engineor-in-Chiet's Branch Kashmir House, Raji Marg ‘New eth 110013 86435/MiscE4(U3) 19 May 2017 Esin- List ‘A’ 8B" r Guidelines. in 1. On perusal of DPRs for PHE schemes submitted by various zones itis analysed that there is a need to issue guidelines on certain design and planning aspects so as to facilitate ‘aster clearances of PHE projects by this H. The consultants hired by Chief Engineers are mostly having experience of working in normal city lie conditions and they tend to ignore the peculiarities in Defence establishments in their DPRs. 2, Low population densities, fluctuating populations, high sanitation standards, remote locations, large unpaved areas, stringent discharge requirements and extreme climatic ‘coneitions make planning of PHE schemes a challenge for MES planners and designers, 3. _List of issues which get neglected by consultants has been prepared and the same is discussed in subsequent paragraphs. Suggestions to include these issues in our schemes have also been given so that in future schemes, these issues’are adequately addressed. (@) Ground Data Required. Ground data required for planning of PHE ‘schemes is reproduced at appendix A’ to this letter. Its important to note that every data required has relevance in the process of planning or design. (©) Calculation of quantity of sewage. Scale of Accommodation Appendix °C’ rust be used for working out water requirement and subsequently to calculate the ‘sewage generated. Ingress of ground water must be added as per site conditions and in accordance with Manual on sewerage and sewage treatment systems (Manual). It important to note that if DWCPE sewers are to be used the ingress of ground water should be assumed on lower side while with RCC NP, sewers it should be of mid- range. In either case total ingress should be less than 10% of sewage generated. (©) Storm Runoff In MES central sewage sewers are not designed to carry storm runoff. Open road side crains are provided for storm waters and are therefore designed separately. (@) Layout Plans and Contours. Consultants tend to ignore importance of contours and layout plans for planning of network of sewers. Preferably layout plans should be prepared on scale so that entice station is easily covered in one Ao drawing, In addition zoomed up detailed plans at scales 1: 1000 on Ay sheets may be prepared along with key plans for ease of understanding and readability. Contours, existing networks, water supply lines, underground cables and otter services should be marked. Details of existing sewers including size of sewers, load and invert level are essentially required for synchronization with new schemes. Colour schemes in line plans should facilitate easy understending and reading. Alternately SP-46 of Bureau of Indian Standards may be followed for preparation of engineering drawings, o” : a© Peak Factor for i 3s. Hitherto, in MES a peal factor of 4 is being used for population up-to 25,000. However, for very small ‘populations say up-to 500 peak factor of 4 is unrealistic. Literature survey on internet ‘was done and reference by IIT Kharagpur was found where IIT in their web courses have recommended peak factor of 6 for small populations. it appears to be realistic keeping in view the fact that large variation in discharges are observed for very small population in MES also. Therefore, for very small populations peak factor of 6 is recommended in MES for population up-to 500. t wil result in substantial saving in cost of excavation for laying of sewers. () Automatic Flushing Tanks(AET). AFTs are provided to generate self-cleansing velocity in gravity sewers however, these are difficult to maintain and requirement of additional water supply makes them undesirable. Therefore, use of [AFT is proposed to be restricted only for very small populations. Alternately treated ‘sewage through dedicated pressure lines be used for flushing of sewers. However, precautions to avoid cross connections of these lines must be ensured thus control valves should have detachable spindles and all pipestfirtures should be of violet colours, (a) Specifications for Hot Climates. _In case of hot climates the self-cleansing velocity should be taken as 0.8 n/s instead of 0.6 mis to minimize formation of slimes ‘and H.S gas in sewers. For this purpose a station having average daily temperature more than 30°C for at least three months may be defined as hot climate. ) Ss 8 for Ext Jdcimates, For extremely cold climates the insulation of sewers and STP is vital. ED 2016 caters for additional cost of these measures @ 8% increase per 5° C fall in average ambient temperature for more than three months below 20? C is allowed. (Technologies of STPs in MES. In MES MBBR has been accepted as standard technology for STPs of 100 KLD capacity and more. However, there is no ‘embargo in use of other cost effective technologies having matching foot prints, which are approved by various central government agencies. In such cases performance assurance for complete life cycle of STP should be obtained and there should not be ‘any exclusive dependence on OEM, for chemicals or Biomass, after 5 years of M&O. (®) Decentralized sewage systems. These days, decentralized sewage systems are being preferred as cost of transport of sewage and that of treated effluent is reduced. In MES since the size of STPs is generaly much small in comparison to civil setups, therefore it may not be economical to use decentralized plants in every case. Therefore, Zonal CEs should ask consultants for planning different options in totality including cost of transportation of sewage and that of treated effluent for reuse. Cost-benefit analysis for all options should be done by consultant to facilitate Zone to select most efficient system. () Reuse and final disposal of treated elfluent. Unless there are compelling reasons, reuse of sewage will be done to reduce demand of fresh water. Various possible non-potable applications treated effluent are ie. arboriculture irigation, fire fighting, washing of pavementroads, flushing of toilets, construction activities and development of water bodies. To avoid accidental cross connections with fresh water lines, measures as mentioned in para (f) ante are to be ensured. Parameters for disposel and reuse will bein accordance with State Bye-laws, however, suggested values are given at Appendix 'B' to this letler. These days some SPCBs have made stringent standards for disposal and have started asking for zero discharge fs. In such situations, it will be appropriate lo have a water body of not more / of fit lt¢ than 2.0m depth in the station where treated effluent can be stored. The percolation ‘and evaporation from water bodies can be designed as final disposal. These water bodies can also act as storage tanks for other reuses. To avoid reappearance of bio ‘mass, fountains! cascades must be provided. (m) Vetting of DPRs. _Ithas been observed that DPRs prepared by consultants, 4re not scrutinised by many zonal CEs and consultants are directed to this Hs for Clearance of DPRs. Vetting of DPRs by engineering colleges is not done seriously as there is no involvement of department causing delays due to inflated or technically unsound reports. This practice is not correct. Henceforth following procedure may be adopted. (i) Consultant submits DPR with various proposals to Zonal CE, (i) CE gets validation of ground data by concemed GE. (il) Proposals are examined at zonal level for feasibility on ground. {iv) One proposal be selected for execution. (Please refer para'k’ ante), (v) Selected proposal be got technically vetted by consultant from IIT/ NIT/ ADG (D&C) /Nominated PHE expert of Comd or E-in-C’s Br. (vi) Revised DPR duly incorporating the suggestions of vetting agency to be ‘submitted by consultant. (vil)Such schemes once vetted by IITINIT/ADG(D&C) or PHE expert will not require technical check at E-in-C’s Branch, however, financial vetting as per practice in ‘vogue will continue, (n) Accountability of OEM. OEM or vendor will not be accountable for hydraulic design aspects of STP if design is done by consultant or department unless during tendering process suggestions of OEM or vendors on design related issues have been incorporated in ‘Q’ bid. Services of consultant may be continued during execution stage also to ensure implementation of workable STP to have sound ‘echnical decisions on any unforeseen issue. A clause to this effect should be included in tender to avoid unnecessary itigation at a later date. Please ensure that above guidelines are followed for all PHE schemes. ‘This hes approval of DGW. He Lali (Sk ros) Dir (PHE) For E-in-C Copy to = DG map ‘ADG(D&C) Pune Jt DGW (Contracts) DDG PPC DDG DesignAspen’ 9 Sic iy, DA) nC Be Io No BXSSAMSSEAUS) ded 18 Ma 2017 ‘A REQUIRE AND DESIGN OF HEMES 4. Ground Data cD ‘Layout plan of Staion with existing network of sewers. Contours at 0.5 m interval superimposed on layout plan. Contours should be linked to nearest Survey of India permanent bench mark. 6 e t a Location of al present and proposed buildings with sewage load Proposed location of STP and reuse of treated wastewater. Location, Depth and NOC regarding use of Municipal sewer. Pans showing water distribution network, under cables and cther UG services. Depth of water table and Sol characteristic including SBC up to 10 m depth or til har ‘trata is achieved at agri of 600 sm with at least one point at location of STP. h ‘Seismic zone of region. | Highest intensty of rainfall and HFL for 50 years at STP site, 2 The best way to ascertain the sewage characterises is to conduct the composite ‘sampling once in a week for diurnal variation on hourly bass from the existing sewage outfall ‘Considering four week month, three samples are to be taken on weekdays and the fourth sample on off day i. Sunday. Sampling should be done for atleast one month during lean flow eeason. Parameters to be tested are listed below. In the absence of actual sewage outfall the parameters to be assumed are mentioned at table below. However, design should be re-veried once actual data is avaliable, RAW SEWAGE CHARACTERISTICS IN ABSENCE OF ACTUAL DATA [SN [Parameter Value] Remaris z 7 [00 200 mal Forces = BOT HIT. 2 | CoD ‘350 mgiL_| For hot climates = 450 mg/L 3 [SS (oa [50-300 [27 Nitogen (Total) ‘50 mgt 8 | Phosphonis(Tota) __—_—~«| 7 Omg “Temperature “ambient 7 Coliforms (Faecal) | 10-10% 700 mi ~| ‘& / O18 Grease 20 = 30 mail (for EME work shop > 50 mg/l) 9 | Chiorides & Sulphaies ‘As per water sample. 1 fo | Only if industrial contamination is expactec e5=85 a pole Pr tls Qo aispenn’ Sub Diet Uy, 06 (Wks, Eee Yo Ble NS B6ANCEALD) Sted 19 May 2017 PARAMETERS FOR VARIOUS REUSE OF TREATED SEWAGE ‘SN | Parameier(2) | Unita] [Arborcutr[iigalon [Toiet | Fre] Erolekes | Conehicion eGo |fornon- | Flushing | Fighing (7 | @) ‘Aesiy (9) course, (#) |edble | 6) cops 6) 1 [pr @5-83 [65-83 [65-3 [65-83 [65-83 /65-85 2 | 10s mgt [210 | 2100 [Ho | 21003000 3 | Tubay—_[Nru |e As ating [2 z z Please reer 4 ss mor [<0 [30 <0 [ewe | Sarais 5 | Temperature |" ‘Ambient | Ambient | Ambient [Ambient [Ambient | 456. © | O1eGease [mgt [70 0 0 Ni ai 7 | Res. Choire [mgt —)>7 Wi oT oT 308 Total fecha 1k mgt | 10 0 10 0 0 9 | BoD mgt [10 2 o 0 0 [CoD gi | Asarsing [30 ‘satsing [As asing | Aas Dissolved "1 1 Phosphorous {94 (| 2 5 1 1 Nitrate 12 | trogen as w | 04 | 10 ‘0 10 10 5 Focal MNT ote a [a 230 nil Ni nil Farite 5 = countt | Asarsing | <1 As asing | As arising | As arising 5 | Coeur ‘AB aisng | Colouess | Colouress | Coboutess 5 Nowe [Tota | Weteat | Weea Me i odour | cco odor | occur [17] Helminth Bog ‘As ating | =teqgt | =Teagt | =Teggt 18 | Suiphates ~~ [mgil | Asarsing | Asarsing | As arising | Asarshg | As arsing | <400 | Chlorides [mgt —[Asarsing | Asarang | Asaisng | Asaiing [As afeing | <0 [20 |Acdiy|mgil | Asavisng [As arising | Asaichg | Asarshg | As asng | ) _ Is the layout plan and design of lightning protection system enclosed to justify the items and quantity catered in AES? 9, Mechanical Laundry (a) Capacity of mechanical laundry should be worked out based on linen available for wash, cycle of mechanical laundry equipment and number of working hours for laundry. Contd...8/- ow8 \ (b) Provision of room for housing the mechanical laundry including water pipes, electric cables and drain out network are to be considered at Board of Officers stage. AES shou be prepared accordingly. 10. Geysers and Solar Water Heating System (a) Number, capacity and type of geysers should be worked out as per Scales of Accn. (b) Wherever solar heating system is proposed, complete details of capacity should be selected as per TI No 03/2009, 11. Desert Coolers, Refrigerators, Dep Freezers and Water Goolers (@) _ The AEs for refrigerators and deep freezers need to be prepared on the basis of Para 56.1.3 of SOA. (b) The quantity and capacity of desert coolers are to be decided considering 30 to 50 air changes per hour depending upon the climatic concitions and calculation details be enclosed (©) The quantity and capacity of water coolers is to be decided based on Army Headquarters, QMG Branch Policy letter No A/39822/03 Wks (Policy) dated 16 Oct 1967 and depending upon the climatic conditions and activity involved. The quantity of drinking water of 2 to 3 liters per person per day will be adequate to meet the requirement. (d) The capacity of voltage stabilizer for above appliances should be 1 KVA otherwise should be technically justified 12, Bulk Petroleum Installation (BP!) Scheme (2) Whatis the nature of proposed work? New! Modification? (>) What will be maximum number of Railway Transported Containers (RTCs) to be received daily and time available for decanting of RTCs at rail heads (information to be obtained from users) (©) What type/quality of fuel is required to be handled? (A) What is approximate quantity of the storage required? (©) What will be the daily requirements of the POL? () Is enough electric supply available to run the proposed installation? If not, what are the proposals? (@) What type of POL tankage installation is recommended, with reasons thereof? () Above ground. Contd...9‘G{g)__ What type of POL tankage installation is recommended, with reasons thereof? () Above ground. (i) Semi-underground. (i) Fully underground. (h) Are you incorporating flame proof fitting in your installations? Please give details of all such fittings. (Are you recommending floating suctions for your POL installations? If so, why do you consider such provision necessary? (kK) What type of micro-filters do you recommend for the installation and why? () Doyyou recommend the use of barrel/ jerry can filing machines? If so, why? Mention types, size and capacity of such equipment. Give details of the sheds also, if required (m) Have users any special preferential requirements for the installation? If so, indicate the details giving its executional feasibilty (9). _Is the provisioning ofthe lightning protection based on CFEES STEC Pamphlet No 17 ‘and IS/IEC 62305-1 to 4 which supersedes IS 2309 of 1989 if so, attach building drawings showing protection systems/zones. (0) Is the layout strictly in accordance with Instructions and Plan of STEC Pamphlet No17? (P) Have you attached all the priced details in respect of all the work proposed? (@) Have you catered sufficient measures against fire hazards? If so, what are your recommendations for the protection of = (i) Pump House (i) Distribution system (i) POL storage (iv) Decanting and filing equipment’s! area (9) How far is your installation from rail head? How do you propose to carry your POL to your installation, by gravity main, pumping or user system give reasons of your choice? (s)__ Will you require any acquisition of land for the proposed scheme, if so give details with anticipated difficulties, if any. Contd... 10/- oO10 (¥) Have you attached the following documents:- G \ () Layout plans showing existing/ proposed scheme in different colours, (i) Schematic diagram of the whole system showing existing and proposed POL equipment in different colours. (ii) Friction head loss calculations in the design of the proposed POL mains (¥) Will the work be executed by MES or it will be executed through deposit work by Oil Company (PSU)? If so, then necessary estimates be obtained from the Oil Company and be made part of the AEs. (w) Has necessary report from Fire Advisor! CFEES obtained for firefighting scheme proposed in case of execution by MES?Appendix Ref Para 4 of E-in-C’s Br letter No. 62888) Gen-Misc Corres /E4 dated 20 Aug 18) CHECK LIST FOR SEWERAGE & SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT 1. The design and planning of sewer networks & STPs should be carried out as per guidelines issued by this HO letter No 86435/MISC/E4 (U3) dated 19 May 17 along with ‘Essential Data’. It is also mandatory to take NOC from SPCB for ‘consent to establish” and ‘consent to operate’ on STP. ‘Sewer Network 2, scaled layout plan of sewer network for existing and proposed must be categorically marked in different colour code, with critical location of Sewage Pumping Station (SPS)/Lift ‘wells etc til STP. Pian a SPS/ lift well at a depth of 6 m to avoid ground water contamination. 3, Ineach branch of sewer, it must be ensured that the self-cleansing velocity (SCV) of 0.6 mis in general and 0.8m/s in hot climate area is achieved to avoid choking of sewer lines. If required SCV is not achieved, AFTs are to be installed judiciously. However, SCV must not be greater than 3 mis in any case to avoid scouring of sewers. 4, Minimum slope of sanitary sewer for various size of pipe should be as per Table 3.13 of ‘Manual of Sewerage & Sewage treatment System" published by CPEEHO. 5, The four parameters ie flow, diameter, slope and self-cleansing velocity (SVC) are very important for design selection of any branch of sewer network. Hence, due care has to be exercised to achieve techno-economical scheme. 6, Whenever SPS/Lift Well are planned, the dia and material of pipe has to be selected as per normal procedure adopted for normal water supply pipeline. 7. Drop man-hole, if any, must be planned. 8 Station authorities/ executives must explore the possibilty, if local municipal sewer facility exists nearby. If yes, mil stn sewage can be off-loaded to municipal corporation after due consideration on minimum applicable charges for carriage and treatment as per SPCB 9. Complete hydraulic profile of sewers indicating pipe dia, sewer length, contributing population, rate of sewerage flow, gradient vV, d/D, self-cleansing velocity (SCV) for each. branch of sewer for peak flow must be provided as per CPEEHO manual. Contd...2J- o2 10. Sewage Pumping Station (SPS) along with adequate non-clog pumps (workih) & standby) are to be proposed for effective storage with level sensors for smooth operations. The design must have hydraulic detention time of 15-30 mins, otherwise septic condition will develop, 11. The sewer network should ideally cover the entire area. However, some isolated and low lying pockets may not be techno-economically feasible for connection to Central Sewage System (CSS) due to very less load and long distance carriage/ pumping. In such case, adequate capacity of septic tank (as per ED-2016) can be installed for the treatment. STP 12. Lab reports of raw sewerage must be provided so as to analyse the type of treatment to be provided viz Moving Bed Bio-Reactor (MBBR), aeration in oxidation pond etc so as to arrive at correct sizing of units 13. Hydraulic design of all the units from equalization tank to last unit (collection tank) must be provided, 14. Quality of treated waste water must be analyzed after commissioning to check the efficiency of the systems. 15. _ The BOD of treated waste water should be 30 ppm for disposal in ponds/rivers and for use in arboriculture. However, it should be 10 ppm after tertiary treatment where ever human touch is involved 16. “No Objection Certificate” from the State Pollution Control Board must be obtained in Case the treated effluent is to be let off in openvnallah or any nearby water body. Septic Tank 17. Capacity of septic tanks, where ever proposed, should be restricted to 150 users as per £D-2016 and must be judiciously planned. 18. Soakage well/Soakage pit sizes should be computed based on percolation rate of soil Soakage well/Soakage pits should be proposed to be above waler table and confirmation to this effect be forwarded along with AEs. 19. _ In case of very shallow water areas, filter bed/reverse filter beds may be considered for secondary treatment of sewage. 20. Small isolated pockets can have packaged type treatment units/ septic tanks. Gontd...3/-fecycle & Reuse 21. Collection and Equalization tank must have aeration system to avoid septic conditions. “ 22. As per user's requirement, size of collection tank must be worked out in case no natural ponding facilty is existing in the area. 23. Arboriculture plan with adequate pumping and piping arrangement shall be provisioned. The pipe must be of different colour codes and marked as “water not for drinking” sign board at the point of tapping. The valves/ tapping points provided must have a detachable spindles to avoid any eventuality. Adm & Safety Measures 24, Estimates for forced ventilation, flame proof light fittings and spark prevention in the SPS/ lft wells are to be included in the DPR. 26. Fresh potable/drinking water must be provided for washing and day to day activities for staff, at the STP area. 26. Adequate approach road and hard standing in the STP area is essential for all weather approachabilty for ease of maintenance and operation.Appendix Jn-C's Br letter No. (Rot Para § of E-in-C’s Br letter No. 62888/ Gen-Misc Corres /E4 dated 20 Aug 18) CERTIFICATE FROM DIR E/M: AEs It is certified that the AEs pertaining to EJM Services have been submitted duly scrutinized as per E-in-C’s Branch letter No. 62888/ Gen-Misc Corres /E4 dated 20 Aug 2018 and all necessary details/documents are enclosed. prepared and Dir E/M of CE ZoneAppendix (Refer Para 3 (b) of E-in-C’s Branch letter No 86440/Misc/Policy/ /£4(U3) Gated ga Jul 20 ) SEWAGE DISPOSAL SCHEME INFORMATION FORM APPLICABLE FOR NEW SEWAGE DISPOSAL SCHEME [EXCEPT STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THE STP} NON TOXIC WASTE WATER ONLY} Location’ or degree latitude. Elevation of the station above Mean Sea Level m. Meteorological Data (a) Rainfall. (i) Maximum intensity of rainfall in a year mm. (i) Average yearly rainfall mm. (>) Temperature. () Max, min & average temperatures in summer:__°C_9C _°C. ) Max, Min & average temperatures in winter:__°C__®C_9C. () Wind. Wind direction during different months/season, Ground Water Table. (2) Depth of Ground Water Table in summer m Page 4 of 8 ‘Scanned with CamScanner(b) Depth of Ground Water Table in winter: _ m Demographic Population, (a) Total population existing at present, including pocket wise breakdown Accommodation statement duly signed by Station HO to be provided (b) Futuristic population (indicate phase wise growth showing time frame for completion of various phases or based on Zonal plan/ accretion of troops expected in the Station, duly authenticated by Station HQ) including pocket- wise breakdown, {c) The population data of entire station/ area of interest (if only part of station being considered) should be given in the following format- Population’ |Scaie of [ Remarks bu water Supply SNo | Bidg | Type | No of Dwelling No | of Bldg / Units (DU) Sewage Treatment Plant. (a) Total area of land (giving dimensions and average ground levels) available for construction of sewage treatment plant. Land area available to be marked on master plan. More than one site can be proposed/ Decentralized ‘Sewage Disposal system can be planned based on terrain! population and its density/ pockets. (b) Distance of sewage treatment plant from nearest building ()__ Percolation Test report as per Appendix 'A’ of IS: 2470 (Part 2) - 1985 ‘at 3-4 sites including one at treatment plant location. (Not required for mechanical treatment plants) (d) Physical and chemical properties of raw Sewage (list attached at Annexure). Page Sof8 3am ‘Scanned with CamScannerDisposal of Treatment Waste Water. (a) Method of final disposal of treated effluent from plant (ie overland, in stream, reuse, etc) with brief reasons. In case it is a combination of two, quantity be specified. (b) Distance of nearest stream/ nallah from the proposed treatment plant Any other stream/ nallah available alsa to be marked, (©) Any legal problems/ acquisition of land required for carriage of sewage from treatment plant to disposal point. (4) Any restrictions of State Pollution Control Board for disposal of effluents. (2) __ If disposal proposed on land then confirmation that it is defence land, size of land area available, location to be clearly marked on master pan/zonal plan. () Whether permission of State Pollution Control Board for disposal of effluent at proposed site is already obtained. Master Plan/ Zonal Plan. (2) Amaster plan/zonal plan drawn to scale 1 in 2000 and showing the following details are required ()) Layout Plan of Station, Buildings, roads and other structures presently existing and those envisaged in future expansion (including phase wise growth time frame of completion of various phases) marked in different colours. Buildings/structures shown must be serially numbered and contributing population from each building (living and nonliving OTM) should be furnished as a separate appendix also. (ii) Contour levels (0.5m interval) to be superimposed on the plan Page 6 of 8 & ‘Scanned with CamScanner(ii) Proposed/ Recommended sewer network alignment (if any) to be marked with the reasons/justifcation. It should be super imposed on contour plan of the area In addition the proposed sewerage network plan should indicate the followings: (aa) Node number at each manhole junction (ab) GLateach node Contributory population both existing & anticipated in future at each node (ac) (ad) Length of sewer between nodes. (b) Drawings of the proposed scheme’ layout plan, as given above, should be in AO size. If all the entries given in the drawings are not legible then separate section wise blow up in AO size should be provided. Four copies of all drawings and one set of drawings without levels to be provided. Soft copies of the drawings and level sheets (in AutoCA0) should also be provided. Notes. 4. Permission from the State Pollution Control Board is a per-requisite for disposal of effluents. The same must, therefore be obtained from the Board. Pollution Control Board generally specifies that BOD and suspended solid contents of treated effluent must not exceed 20.0 mg/L or 30.0 mgil, based on location. In case any other condition/restrictions are placed by the board, the same must be intimated 2 Incase the Sewage Treatment Plantis to treat any toxic liquid waste, in addition to domestic sewage, the volume and characteristics of such wastes may be intimated. 3. Characteristics of toxic waste can be determined only by laboratory analysis. In case laboratory facilities are not available locally, values of the same adopted by the local municipalities may be obtained and forwarded. ew Page 7 of 8 __s ‘Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure (Refer Para 6 (d) of Appendix) PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF RAW SEWAGE “TechnicaliChemical Performance of STP Physicochemical Parameters influent | Effient (Required) | aimidayy —T ~ o _| pH — ~~ — [— _ — TS (mgt) a ~ _ VS(mg/L) _ ~ ft — - COD (mg Oxi} - | TKN (mg NL) | N-NH# (mg NL) [RENOs (mg NL) POS (mgP) Total Alkalinity (mg CaCOs/L) Intermediate Alkalinity (mg Cacoyl) ‘S04? (mg SO4/L) Conductivity (mS/cm) Turbidity Hygienic and health impact evaluation of STP Effluent Microbiological Parameter — Total Coliform Faecal coliforms | Salmonella (optional) Ascaris eggs (optional) | Shigella (optional) a te “adm, Page 8 of 8 ‘Scanned with CamScanner