Name:Laudo, Chaila Beth T.

BSBA-FM1_3 6425 EFCOM

Individual Feedback on Team 3 & 4

(Team 3)

I noticed that the presenter in Group 3 spent the most of his time looking at the audience. They
make eye contact with audience members at some point during the presentation. The audience
fully hears and understands every word spoken. Some people may not hear the entire speech
because they are taking notes. They handle unforeseen problems with grace, excitement, and
perseverance, never becoming sidetracked. The purpose of the speech is to demonstrate how they
will be able to talk about their experiences as students and how they overcame challenges. Their
entire presentation was excellent, and I could tell they gave it their all.

(Team 4)

The concept of a Campaign Rally is appealing, and the elements: message, speakers, and channel
were all good. Structure, flow, and articulation within the speech, on the other hand, reached a
degree of incoherence, which distracted me slightly from understanding the full presentation. I
liked how they appeared in terms of concept because it suited their red and white insignia. There
was some interruption, however, due to some participants becoming disconnected and needing to
move on to the next speaker, as well as some unnecessary background noise that overlapped the
speaker's comments. In addition to the platforms/goals they wanted to convey with everyone, I
believe it would have been better if they had focused on their objective, which I believe is to
persuade and inform people to vote for them as candidates. Overall, I believe Group 4 did an
excellent job with their presentation.