Professional Documents
Culture Documents
14. Explain the role of one agonist, making use of one study. (as of 2020)
An agonist is any chemical that binds to a receptor site on a post-synaptic neuron, causing the neuron to
fire. Neurotransmitters are endogenous agonists - the brain's natural chemicals that bind to receptor sites,
leading to an action potential. Drugs can play the same role and are called exogenous agonists. One
example of an exogenous agonist is alcohol. Alcohol binds with dopamine receptor sites, causing
dopamine neurons to fire. The firing of these neurons results in the activation of the brains reward system -
the nucleus accumbent.
The study of the role of alcohol on the brain's reward system has led to theories about the origins of
alcoholism. Leyton (2014) carried out a study with 26 healthy social drinkers. The researcher then
categorized the drinkers based on their risk for alcoholism based on personality traits and having a lower
intoxication response to alcohol - that is, they did not feel as drunk despite having drunk the same amount
as other drinkers. Each participant underwent a PET scan after drinking juice then later, alcohol. In each
condition they were asked to drink three drinks in 15 minutes.
It was found that when drinking alcohol, those who were considered "high risk" for alcoholism showed
significantly greater activity in the nucleus accumbens. The researchers argued that alcohol is an agonist
for dopamine, connecting to dopamine receptor sites and causing the neurons to fire. It is hypothesized
that people with a potential for alcoholism have a greater response to the agonist than those at low-risk.
Research shows that those with a low level of dopamine neuron activity as a result of alcohol consumption
often get tired after drinking a small amount of alcohol. This is because the higher level of dopamine
activity counteracts the sedative effects of alcohol. By studying the way in which alcohol acts as an agonist
on dopamine neurons, it is also possible that researchers could find ways to treat the disorder.
15. Explain the role of one antagonist, making use of one study. (as of 2020)
An antagonist is any substance that fits into a receptor site on the post-synaptic neuron, inhibiting the
neuron. This means that the neuron will not fire and therefore a behavior will not happen. Acetylcholine is
a neurotransmitter that plays a role in the formation of memories. It is not possible for researchers
to directly observe the role of neurotransmitters, so one of the ways that they attempt to understand the role
of different neurotransmitters is by giving animals or human participants an antagonist. They want to see
what happens when acetylcholine receptors are blocked, and the neurons are "not allowed" to fire.
An example of an antagonist commonly used in memory research is scopolamine. Rasmusson and Dadar
(1979) gave participants a scopolamine tablet and asked them to either learn a series of numbers or to
solve a maze task. In a second condition, participants were given a placebo as a control. In the number
series condition, verbal declarative memory was being tested. In the maze task, spatial memory was being
tested. The researchers found that there was no significant difference between the placebo group and
the AcH antagonist group in the number series condition. It appears that AcH may not play a key role in
the encoding of declarative memories. However, participants in the scopolamine group made more errors
and took longer to solve the maze. This study is supported also by animal research - such as the study by
Rogers and Kesner - that found that scopolamine inhibits a rat's ability to remember a maze. It also
makes sense as Maguire found that taxi drivers had more grey matter in their posterior hippocampus - an
area of the brain high in AcH receptor sites.
By using an antagonist, blocking AcH receptor sites, researchers are better able to understand the role of
the neurotransmitter in the formation of memory.
16. Explain neural pruning, making use of one study. (as of 2020)
Neuroplasticity is the process by which our brains adapt to changes in the environment. One of the ways
that our brains change is through the creation of neural networks. This happens because of long-term
potentiation - that is, the repeated firing of neurons. This leads to an increase in dendritic branching which
leads to an increase in the number of synapses. Another way that our brain can change is through
synaptic pruning - which is a decrease in the number of synapses as a result of the removal of
dendritic branches. Pruning can be the result of neuron cell death, hormones such as cortisol or the lack of
use of a neural pathway. The exact mechanism of synaptic pruning is not yet fully understood.
A study by Dragansky showed that when neural pathways are not used, they may be pruned. The sample
was made up of 24 non-jugglers. Each participant had an MRI scan at the beginning of the study in order
to see the structure of the brain prior to the experiment. The participants were randomly allocated to one of
two conditions. In one condition, they were asked to learn a juggling routine and to practice it daily until
they had mastered it. When they did, they had a second MRI. Then they were told not to juggle any more.
Three months later they had a third MRI. The other group of participants simply served as a control group.
Using voxel-based morphometry the researchers measured the density of the grey matter in the brains of
jugglers vs. non-jugglers. The jugglers showed a significantly larger amount of grey matter in the mid-
temporal area in both hemispheres - an area associated with visual memory. Three months after
the participants stopped juggling, the amount of grey matter in these parts of the brain had decreased.
This shows that when learning a new skill, new neural networks were created. However, when
the behaviour stopped and those neurons were no longer activated, the neurons were pruned.
Researchers hypothesize that synaptic pruning is a way to increase the efficiency of the brain.
17. Explain the role of one hormone in human behaviour, making use of one study.
Hormones, like neurotransmitters, are chemical messengers in the body. They are released into the
bloodstream and travel with blood to reach their destination, where they can only influence cells that have
receptors for this particular hormone. Such cells are called target cells. When a hormone binds to a
receptor it launches a sequence of changes, some of which are genomic: gene activation or gene
suppression. An example of a hormone is oxytocin, produced in the hypothalamus and released into the
blood by the pituitary gland. It plays a role in sexual reproduction, childbirth, and social bonding. This essay
includes a discussion of the role of oxytocin in promoting human ethnocentrism, through the use of a study
by De Dreu et al (2011).
De Dreu et al (2011) found that oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism, a type of inter-group bias where
one’s own ethnic group is perceived as more important than or superior to others. They conducted a series
of experiments all of which used double-blind placebo-control independent measures designs. Participants
in the studies were indigenous Dutch males. They self-administered either oxytocin or a placebo intra-
nasally. Experiments involved exposing subjects to images of people belonging either to their ingroup
(Dutch males) or outgroup (immigrants from the Middle East and German citizens).
Experiments used “moral-choice dilemma” tasks, such as the famous trolley problem. Participants in the
oxytocin and placebo groups were given a series of moral choice dilemmas where decision had to be made
as to whether one person should be killed in order to save five other people (for example, hitting the switch
that will divert the trolley to another track, killing one individual and saving five). In some of these tasks the
target person (the one who had to be killed) was a member of participants’ ingroup, and in other tasks a
member of their outgroup. This was achieved by manipulating the name of the target person: either a
typically Dutch name (Dirk or Peter, for example) or a typically Arab name (such as Ahmed or Youssef) or a
typically German name (such as Markus or Helmut). The other five individuals were unnamed and so their
identity or ethnic background was not indicated.
Results showed that under oxytocin males were more likely to sacrifice an outgroup target than an ingroup
target, while under the placebo there was no significant difference. Further analysis of the data revealed
that, compared with males in the placebo (control) condition, males under oxytocin were less likely to
sacrifice a member of their ingroup, but were not more likely to sacrifice a member of the outgroup. Based
on this, it was concluded that oxytocin promotes ingroup favouritism.
Strengths of this study include that it was double-blind (where neither the participants nor the
experimenters know who is receiving a particular treatment) self-administered, (the drug was taken by the
participants themselves, making the study ethical), and a homogenous group was taken as subjects.
However, the weaknesses include that an assumption was made that specific cultures have certain names
and that the subjects knew those stereotypical name. Lastly, deception was used for the experiment and
the conclusions made were social-sensitive – just because the men sacrificed the outgroup doesn’t prove
ethnocentric beliefs.
All in all, this study does shows how hormones have widespread effects on both physiology and psychology
in humans and thus behaviour. Despite its weaknesses, some correlations can be made; however, the
nature of the conclusions being social-sensitive show that it is NOT appropriate to say that hormones
“cause” behaviour rather that hormones change the probability that a particular behaviour will be displayed.
18. Explain one study of the role of pheromones in human behaviour.
Pheromones are chemicals that are released outside into the environment which further affect the
behaviour of other species. They are secreted through glands in our body containing natural pheromones
and then the VNO senses the pheromones triggering the neurons. The signal is sent to the olfactory
nerves, then to the hypothalamus which stimulates emotions. Even though it isn’t clear that humans have
pheromones that play a significant role in signalling with species, there is little evidence. For example, Zhou
et al carried out an experiment to see if pheromones affected human sexual behaviour.
They took a sample of 96 participants which included 24 heterosexual women, 24 heterosexual men, 24
lesbian women and 24 gay men. The experiment comprised of the participants watching stick figures trying
to determine their gender. During this, the participants were made to smell cloves. There were 3 conditions:
First, the cloves were mixed with androstadienone; second, the cloves were mixed with estratetraenol; and
third was the control group where only cloves were used.
The results showed that the smell of androstadienone made heterosexual women and gay men to identify
the stick figures as more masculine whereas the smell of estratetraenol made heterosexual men and
lesbian women to identify the stick figures as more feminine. This study clearly shows how pheromones
have an impact on how one perceives the others’ gender information as, in a sex-specific manner. Although
this study had some limitations like replicability issues, unnaturalistic setting etc., it conclusively depicts the
role and influence of pheromones in human behaviour.
19. Explain one study of the role of genes in human behaviour.
A gene is a unit of heredity which codes for a specific trait. Genetic heritability is the contribution of genetic
factors into a trait or behaviour. We know that physical traits can be passed down from generation to
generation but what about behaviour? There are many studies that prove that role of genes and genetic
heritability in human behaviour. In this essay, for instance, there is a discussion on Bouchard and McGue,
who carried out a twin study to research on the genetic inheritance of intelligence.
When carrying out twin research, if the concordance rate for MZ twins is significantly higher than for DZ
twins or siblings, it is likely that there is a genetic component to the behaviour. If the concordance rate is
high for both MZ and DZ twins it may be assumed that environmental factors play a large role in the
observed behaviour. In this case, they used a self-selected sample of monozygotic (MZ) twins who had
been reared together (MZT) and MZ twins that had been raised apart (MZA).
They wanted to see the concordance rates for the IQ to test the intelligence. The results showed that for IQ,
the concordance rate was 88% for MZT and 69% for MZA. Because the concordance rate for MZT was not
a perfect 100%, the researchers concluded that environmental factors do play a role in intelligence, but it is
largely inherited.
There are some limitations to this study as well. For example, the calculation of concordance rates is not
very reliable and there was no control over the external environmental factors which questions the accuracy
of the genetic contribution of intelligence. Lastly, twin studies are difficult to generalise because the twins
are not as representative of the general population. Despite these limitations, this study evidently shows
how genetics can play a role in passing behavioural traits in humans.
20. Explain the use of twin studies using one study. (as of 2020)
Twin studies are used in genetic research to study the correlation between genetic inheritance and
behaviour due to the common genetics shared by twins. Genetic heritability is the contribution of genetic
factors into a trait or behaviour. We know that physical traits can be passed down from generation to
generation but what about behaviour? There are many twin studies that prove that role of genes and
genetic heritability in human behaviour. In this essay, for instance, there is a discussion on Bouchard and
McGue, who carried out a twin study to research on the genetic inheritance of intelligence.
[continue with gene and behaviour body paragraphs from previous question]
21. Explain one evolutionary explanation of one behaviour.
Evolution is the process by which organisms change from generation to generation as a result of a change
in heritable characteristics. The theory of evolution explains the variety of species and their modifications
that we observe in the world by placing all these species into a developmental historical perspective. It also
traces back common ancestors for all organisms, including humans. It all occurs due to natural selection.
This essay is going to focus on a study by Curtis, Aunger, and Rabie (2004) who suggested that disgust
has evolved as a protection from risk of disease.
To test their hypotheses, Curtis, Aunger and Rabie (2004) used a survey placed on the BBC Science
website. The survey was advertised in a BBC documentary. It was completed by over 77,000 people from
165 countries. However, after data cleaning, the final sample size was slightly less than 40,000. For
example, all participants who had watched the BBC documentary were excluded because they could have
been exposed to the hypothesis of the study. First, respondents were asked a set of demographic
questions on their age, sex, country, and so on. Then they were asked to rate 20 photographs (appearing
one by one on separate screens) for disgust on a scale from 1 (not disgusting) to 5 (very disgusting). Of
these photographs, 14 comprised 7 pairs of disease-salient versus less salient stimuli.
The results of the survey supported all the hypotheses proposed by the researchers. First, disease-salient
stimuli were rated as more disgusting than less salient ones. Second, the results were consistent across
cultures. Third, females rated the disease-salient pictures as more disgusting than men. Fourth, as
predicted, there was an age-based decline in the sensitivity to disease-salient stimuli. Finally, disgust is felt
more strongly in contact with strangers than with relatives (average responses showed that people were
less likely to share a toothbrush with a postman than their spouse).
As per the evaluation, the method was overall good, with high population validity because the results can
be generalised to large populations and cultures. The questions of the survey were no intrusive, causing no
physical or mental harm to the participants. The true aims of the study were necessarily hidden from the
participants (to avoid demand characteristics), which can be considered as unethical as a form of
deception.
In conclusion, the study clearly shows how people associate disgust as a response that reduces the risk of
diseases. It supports the idea of the evolutionary explanation of the feeling of disgust. Therefore, it is
possible for behaviour to evolve.
22. Explain the use of family studies (kinship studies) using one study. (as of 2020)
Family studies study behaviour between family members who have similar genetics to different degrees.
Genetic heritability is the contribution of genetic factors into a trait or behaviour. We know that physical
traits can be passed down from generation to generation but what about behaviour? There are many family
studies that prove that role of genes and genetic heritability in human behaviour. In this essay, for instance,
there is a discussion on a study by Kendler et al (2015), who conducted a rigorously designed adoption
study of a sample of sibling pairs in which one of the siblings was home-reared and the other one was
adopted away.
For their study, the complete national Swedish register of male-male siblings was searched, initially
identifying 436 male sibling sets where one of the members was reared by adoptive parents. IQ scores
were taken from the Military Conscription Register (which includes cognitive assessment data for all 18-
year-old men in Sweden). Available data also included the educational attainment of both biological and
adoptive parents.
Findings showed that the mean educational level was significantly higher in the group of adoptive parents
as compared to biological parents. There was a modest correlation (r = 0.18) between the educational
levels of biological and adoptive parents, which may suggest some effects of selective placement, the
process of matching adoptive parents to adopted children with respect to particular characteristics.
Their study has high internal reliability because of the large population of people involved and a high
ecological validity as well. However, it has low population validity because only Swedish people were
considered and hence, can’t be generalised to larger populations. Further, the study only proves a
correlation between the variable and does not infer causation because of the less control over the
variables. This also means that the study has bidirectional ambiguity because the direction of the
correlation is unknown.
In conclusion, interpretation of these findings suggests that cognitive ability is environmentally malleable:
there was a 5-point IQ increase on average by age 18. The fact that there is a correlation between
cognitive ability of adopted children and educational levels of adoptive parents supports this conclusion. On
the other hand, results also suggest heritability of intelligence: this is evident from the correlation between
cognitive ability of adopted children and the educational level of biological parents. Results seem to
suggest an additive influence of environment and genetics: the largest IQ scores were observed in adopted
children from well-educated biological families adopted into well-educated families.
ERQs (22 marks each)
1. Discuss the use of one or more research methods.
2. Evaluate the use of one or more research methods.
3. Discuss ethical considerations.
4. Evaluate at least one technique used to study the brain in relation to behaviour.
5. Evaluate research on localization of function.
6. Evaluate research on neuroplasticity.
7. Evaluate research on the role of neurotransmission on behaviour.
8. Discuss the role of hormones on behaviour, using one or more examples.
9. Discuss the role of pheromones in human behaviour, using one or more examples.
10. To what extent does genetic inheritance play a role in one behaviour?
11. Evaluate research on the role of genes on behaviour.
12. Discuss/Evaluate one evolutionary explanation of behaviour.
HL extension
13. Discuss the value of animal models in psychology research.
14. Discuss the value of animal models in the study of the brain and behaviour.
15. Discuss the value of animal models in the study of hormones and behaviour.
16. Discuss the value of animal models in the study of the role of genes on behaviour.
17. To what extent can animal research provide insight into human behaviour?
18. To what extent can animal research provide insight into the role of the brain in human behaviour?
19. To what extent can animal research provide insight into the role of genes on human behaviour?
20. To what extent can animal research provide insight into the role of hormones on human behaviour?
21. Discuss ethical considerations in animal research.
22. Discuss ethical considerations in animal research on the brain and behaviour.
23. Discuss ethical considerations in animal research on hormones and behaviour.
24. Discuss ethical considerations in animal research on the role of genes on behaviour.
Q. Discuss the value of animal models to provide insight into the role of the brain and behaviour.
An animal model is a concept that refers to using animal research to test a certain cause–effect hypothesis
about a certain human behaviour. In the biological approach, animals are often used to study human
behaviour. This is because of various reasons supported by the Biological Level of Analysis (BLOA): (1)
Genetic similarities between humans and animals, (2) Ability to study behaviour over the lifespan of the
animal as well as control the environment, and (3) Less ethical concerns compared to studies involving
humans. The real question here is: “Are animals really that valuable to study humans?” This essay will
explore this through the use of two studies: LeDoux (1994) and Rosenzweig, Bennet & Diamond (1972).
LeDoux to understand what happens in the brain during the fear response. By using lesioning in
rats, LeDoux (1994) determined that the amygdala played a key role in the fear response. He
proposed a model based on his research with rats that argues that there are two paths in a fear
response. When we see something fearful, the visual thalamus sends a message to the amygdala.
This results in a fear response and blood pressure rises. This is a quick response that is important
for our survival. He called this the low path. In the second path – the high path - the message from
the thalamus passes through the visual cortex and the hippocampus and its meaning is interpreted.
If the stimulus is perceived to not be a threat, the amygdala lowers blood pressure and ceases the
fear reaction.
o Current techniques for examining the human brain are still not able to study the neural
systems in the way that animal models allow. Although researchers can study patients with
brain lesions, these lesions often include damage to other structures and are not as precise
as the animal models. In addition, because of the plastic nature of the brain, if the lesions
occurred a long time again, the brain has changed in structure to compensate for the
damage and so it is difficult to determine the exact effect of the lesion.
Rosenzweig, Bennet & Diamond's (1972) study on the role of environmental stimuli on brain
plasticity. As the study was highly controlled, the researchers argued that there was a cause and
effect relationship between stimuli and brain development. However, in order to actually measure
the effect, the researchers had to kill the animals and then measure the density of the brains.
o Not all experiments in psychology use mice. Even closer to us genetically than mice,
primates have been used in several studies. The following study is one of the classic studies
in the psychology of stress.
Discuss the value of animal models to provide insight into the role of hormones and/or pheromones
and behaviour.
Discuss the value of animal models to provide insight into the role of genes on behaviour.
Discuss ethical considerations in animal research.
Discuss ethical considerations in animal research on the brain and behaviour.
Discuss ethical considerations in animal research on hormones and/or pheromones and behaviour.
Discuss ethical considerations in animal research on the role of genes on behaviour.
Although animal research is often conducted because it would be too unethical to be conducted on
humans, it is still necessary to ensure that ethics are not breached while involving animals in studies. One
ethical consideration in the biological approach is informed consent. Informed consent is the process in
which the participants of a certain study are informed about the risks, benefits, and procedure of the study.
The participant must agree to participate in the study, with the knowledge of the option of withdrawal,
anonymity, and other rights, which is when it will be ethical.
However, in the biological approach where animal models are used, there are some issues regarding
informed consent. The first is that animals can’t give actual consent to be subjects of a study, which brings
into question a lot of things and makes the study unethical. Additionally, studies that involve damage to the
brain or long term psychological impact on mental health are the ones that are usually done on animals
(because they can’t be done using humans). For this, it can be argued that the participants (animals) do not
understand the risks and procedure of the study and hence, they don’t know what they are agreeing to do
(they’re not exactly agreeing anyways).
Harry Harlow drew condemnation for his "pit of despair" experiments on rhesus macaque monkeys
in the 1970s. The aim of the research was to produce an animal model of clinical depression. In
1974, American literary critic Wayne C. Booth wrote that, "Harry Harlow and his colleagues go on
torturing their nonhuman primates decade after decade, invariably proving what we all knew in
advance—that social creatures can be destroyed by destroying their social ties."
Seligman (1965) conducted an experiment in which dogs were shocked. Some dogs were able to
end the shocks, but those that had no control developed a sense of learned helplessness. The
dogs in this group displayed clinical depression.
Studies on the role of acetylcholine on memory (Martinez & Kesner, n.d.)
Research on the role of stress on health (Shively & Day, 2015)
Research on the role of hormones on mating behaviour in prairie voles (Winslow et al, 1993).