QSGTL-EP CM CON TR ACT

Audit September 2018.

P810149 NCC Filtration
QSGTL-EPCM Contract
Assessment Report

403040-00118-QA-REP-0019

Assessment Prepared
Assessors Report Date Reviewed by
Date by
th th
17 to 28 - Rao Yedlapalli
07-Oct-2018 YSR BCC
Sep-2018 James Mills

WorleyParsons, Qatar
Al Wosail Tower (AWT), 6th - 10th Floor
Majis Al Tawoon Street, West Bay Area PO Box 18130
Doha, Qatar
Telephone: +974 4019 3333
Facsimile: +974 4019 3300
www.worleyparsons.com
© Copyright 2018 WorleyParsons Services Pty Ltd
QSGTL-EPCM CONTRACT
ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC FILTRATION UI601670 ASSESSMENT REPORT

1 EXECUTIVE S UMMARY
This Fully QMS Assessment was undertaken on the 17-Sep-2018 to 28-Sep- 2018 for the P810149
NCC Filtration Project.

The main reference documents are as follows:

 ISO 9001:2015 QMS

 P810149 Project Execution Plan: T‐4.812.895 Rev A01
 Construction Management Plan: T-4.803.206/403040-00118-PM-PLN-0006 Rev A01
 Engineering Plan: T-4.803.208/ 403040-00118-PM-PLN-0008 Rev I02
 C&P Plan: T-4.803.212/ 403040-00118-PM-PLN-0012 Rev I01
 Project Controls Plan: T-4.803.203/ 403040-00118-PM-PLN-0003 Rev I01

The assessment consisted of Interviews with Project Engineers, C&P, Project Controls, Information
Management, and Engineering Disciplines – Process, Piping, Instrumentation (PACO), Mechanical,
Eng. Safety, and Civil / Structural of worleyparsons team.

It is also noted that during the Construction Management Plan assessment that took place in August,
with the Doha and Site based Construction Team, part of the focus was on the QCON start-up for the
NCC Filtration project, and any construction team reference in this assessment will be from that
assessment.

Audit Team

Ye d la p al li S a id ar a o- L ea d A u d it or - S h e ll R e p

Ja m e s M i ll s – A u d it or - S h e ll R e p

B e rn ad e tt e – O b se rv er - S h e ll Re p

Audit Type: E xt er n a l/ I nt er na l

Audit Location: O n s i t e – R a s l af f a n

Overall Conclusion

We would like to thank in the Audit from Worleyparsons, Mukhtar Saqlain,John Tarbet, Greg, Moore,
Kwietniewska kinga, Viswanth VJ, Kadam-Shrikrishna, Sanketh Bangera, Narendra Chennuri, Rajesh
Debnath, Swapnil Ainpukar, Usman Masood, Syed Shazad, Castro Marcelino, Greg; who have shown
professionalism and transparency throughout.

While there are a number of actions and observations identified for this assessment. it should be
noted that most of these will be generic across all projects and is not a specific reflection on the Brine
to Harbour Project, but a general refection and an attempt to improve our working processes across
the portfolio.

ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC Filtration 403040-00118-QA-REP-0020: Rev I01 : 08-Oct-2018

Page 2
QSGTL-EPCM CONTRACT
ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC FILTRATION UI601670 ASSESSMENT REPORT

The assessment concluded with identified strengths, Two (2) Action Requests, and Eight (8)
Opportunities for improvement.

Strengths
The assessment has identified key strengths, including:

 NCC filtration packages were

 All Engineering disciplines are receiving good support from the PE.

Notwithstanding the positive commitment shown, the assessment has identified activities that do not
yet meet the QSGTL-EPCM Contract expectations.

Key Fi ndi ngs and Areas for I mprovement

Section 3 includes (2) Action Requests and (7) Opportunities as follows:

Very High 0 High 0 Medium 2 Low 0 Opportunity 7

In summary key areas for improvement established through the findings include:

Action Requests

2.1. Resubmission of Project Execution Plan (T-4.812.895) Rev A01 for QPH review.

2.2. Implementation of Check list for Engineering (Process) deliverables.

Opportunity

1. It recommended to develop the Checklist process for Structural Drawings.

2. Ensure that The Project Risk Register is regularly reviewed and updated.

3. Project lessons learnt register available onsite & have a focal point to collect construction related
lesson learnt.

4. Document Dist. Matrix(DDM) is developed and used for construction team & Contractor after
award.

5. Drawing No: MTC-1575-GPR-1001 Underground Scanning report was issued with QP logo by
M/s MTC Survey.

6. Ensure that SDRL status for the Instrumentation discipline deliverables.

7. The Engineering Checking of Check-prints does not comply (Electrical).

ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC Filtration 403040-00118-QA-REP-0020: Rev I01 : 08-Oct-2018

Page 3
QSGTL-EPCM CONTRACT
ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC FILTRATION UI601670 ASSESSMENT REPORT

2 ACTION REQUESTS

2.1 F in a l i za ti o n of P r o je ct Ex e cu t i on P l an

Consequence: Likelihood:
Risk: Moderate
Minor Likely

Description of Resubmission of Project Execution Plan (T-4.812.895) Rev A01 for QPH
Issue/Opportunity: review.
Causes: The PE was busy with other projects.
Consequences: Incomplete of PEP submission
Agreed Actions:

Assignee: Kinga Kwietniewska Due Date: 15/11/18

2.2 Non- utiliz ation of Checklist-Process

Consequence: Likelihood:
Risk: Moderate
Minor Likely

Description of
Non- utilization of Checklist-Process
Issue/Opportunity:
Causes: Lack of awareness
Consequences:
Agreed Actions:

Assignee: Rajesh Debnath Due Date: 15/11/19

ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC Filtration 403040-00118-QA-REP-0020: Rev I01 : 08-Oct-2018

Page 4
 QSGTL-EPCM CONTRACT
ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC FILTRATION UI601670 ASSESSMENT REPORT

3 DET AILE D FI NDINGS

# Procedure/ Criteria Results (Narrative) Recommendations AR Ref

3.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

3.1.1 T‐4.812.895 Rev
Recommended to
 It is noted that there is Project Execution Plan (PEP)- T-4.812.895 was submitted for QPH’s
A01 AR 2.1
Review on 4th June-2018. The QPH provide some comments for the PEP and further there is no resubmission of PEP with
evidence of the document to revised for next submission. consideration of QPH
ISO 9001:2015
recommendations.
QMS
 Risk assessment workshop should be a Project Key milestone and All the Key milestones shall be
with specific dates and not with just months (Refer Section 3.3- PEP) (OBS-01)

 A separate document registers were maintaining for WPQ Deliverables (MDR-Master Document
Register) & Supplier deliverables (SDI -Supplier Document Index). However, there was no evident
of the control of Implementation Contractors documents.

ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC Filtration 403040-00118-QA-REP-0020: Rev I01 : 08-Oct-2018

Page 5
 QSGTL-EPCM CONTRACT
ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC FILTRATION UI601670 ASSESSMENT REPORT

# Procedure/ Criteria Results (Narrative) Recommendations AR Ref

3.2 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

3.2.1 403040-00118- When onsite during the construction management assessment, the NCC Filtration project was
PM-PLN-0006 discussed with the site team and the Implementation contractor QCON:
Rev A01
 BLACKCAT- Have a contract for the Hot-Taps (4). The completion of this initially delayed
due to Finalisation of documents, However the main delay has been the weather
ISO 9001:2015 conditions Red/Black Flag.
QMS
 QCON-Initially awarded the trail pits-Excavation work to determine what underground
services are in where the vessels & Equipment will be installed. This scope has grown (4
additional variations) and is still not complete.

 QCON have recently been awarded the main contract for installation of vessels &
Associated piping & Equipment. Going forward it is believed Qcon will combine the trail
pit schedule into the main scope and QCON.

 There is a problem with communication of material status to the construction team and
Qcon. It is understanding that there is information in the Expediting reports that we do not
wish the Contractor to have, however there needs to be some kind of report that gives
regular status of materials & when Qcon can expect delivery, otherwise it will be difficult
to plan their work Efficiently.
 Recommend making project lessons learnt register available onsite & have focal point to
collect construction related lesson learnt.

 Recommend Document Dist. Matrix is developed and used for construction team &
Contractor after award. (To ensure relevant persons get the required documents)

ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC Filtration 403040-00118-QA-REP-0020: Rev I01 : 08-Oct-2018

Page 6
 QSGTL-EPCM CONTRACT
ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC FILTRATION UI601670 ASSESSMENT REPORT

# Procedure/ Criteria Results (Narrative) Recommendations AR Ref

3.3 CONTRACTS & PROCUREMENT

3.3.1 403040-00118- Generally, processes are well understood.
None
PM-PLN-0012
Rev I01
None

ISO 9001:2015
QMS

3.4 PROJECT CONTROLS

3.4.1 403040-00118- Generally, processes are well understood.
PM-PLN-0003 It was noted that the Project Control is monitoring KPI monthly basis.
Rev I01

ISO 9001:2015
QMS

ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC Filtration 403040-00118-QA-REP-0020: Rev I01 : 08-Oct-2018

Page 7
 QSGTL-EPCM CONTRACT
ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC FILTRATION UI601670 ASSESSMENT REPORT

# Procedure/ Criteria Results (Narrative) Recommendations AR Ref

3.5 ENGINEERING - GENERAL

3.5.1 403040-00118- N/A
Discussed the following processes with all disciplines: CTR Development, Comment Response
PM-PLN-0008
Rev I02 Sheets, Holds Register, Site Query / Supplier Query (SQ), Key Document Change Notification
(KDCN) Technical Query(TQ), PVN/PCR, Calculations, Electronic File Location P&ID (Process)
Drawing and Document Development, Checking Process, Risk Meeting / Register and Lessons
ISO 9001:2015 Learnt.
QMS

3.6 ENGINEERING- CIVIL & STRUCTURAL

3.7.1 403040-00118- Generally, processes are well understood.

- Ensure checking colors are
PM-PLN-0008 AR # 2.2
 Checking colours are not followed. followed. (roll out checking
Rev I02
process within the discipline).
ISO 9001:2015
QMS

3.8 ENGINEERING – ELECTRICAL

ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC Filtration 403040-00118-QA-REP-0020: Rev I01 : 08-Oct-2018

Page 8
 QSGTL-EPCM CONTRACT
ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC FILTRATION UI601670 ASSESSMENT REPORT

3.8.1 403040-00118- Generally, processes are well understood. AR # 2.2

- Ensure there are enough
PM-PLN-0008
 It was found that Document originator is signing as a Checker. personnel (Draft checker)
Rev I02
available to complete the
 Checking colours are not followed.
required checking process.
ISO 9001:2015
QMS - Ensure checking colors are
followed. (roll out checking
process within the discipline).

3.9 ENGINEERING – INSTRUMENTATION (PACO)

3.9.1 403040-00118- Demonstrated good awareness and use of all processes discussed.
- Ensure the checking
PM-PLN-0008 Rev AR # 2.2
 A number of early check-prints were missing the draft-check and back-check signatures, process is maintained.
I02
this has been addressed in later check-prints, the correct process is now being followed.

ISO 9001:2015
QMS

3.10 ENGINEERING – MECHANICAL

ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC Filtration 403040-00118-QA-REP-0020: Rev I01 : 08-Oct-2018

Page 9
 QSGTL-EPCM CONTRACT
ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC FILTRATION UI601670 ASSESSMENT REPORT

3.10.1 403040-00118- Demonstrated good awareness and use of all processes discussed.
N/A
PM-PLN-0008 Rev
 Supplier Document Index (SDI) is maintain for NCC filtration package and most of the
I02
documents were Approved status.

ISO 9001:2015
QMS

3.11 ENGINEERING – PIPING

3.11.1 403040-00118- Demonstrated good awareness and use of all processes discussed.
N/A
PM-PLN-0008 Rev
I02
ISO 9001:2015
QMS

3.12 ENGINEERING - PROCESS

3.12.1 403040-00118- Generally, processes are well understood.
WP Design and
PM-PLN-0008 Rev
 A WP checklist was not attached to each check print. Engineering checklists to
I02
be used and attached to AR # 2.2
Issues with the checking system for Process.
check-prints.
ISO 9001:2015  Checking colours are not followed consistently.
QMS

ASSESSMENT P810149 NCC Filtration 403040-00118-QA-REP-0020: Rev I01 : 08-Oct-2018

Page 10