This document appears to be a school assessment report that evaluates a school's leadership and governance practices. It contains 6 indicators that assess elements such as whether the school has an approved development plan created with stakeholder input, whether the plan is regularly reviewed collaboratively, and whether the school has a clear organizational structure defining roles. For each indicator, it provides the standards and levels of practice (from 0 to 3) to evaluate the school's performance. The document seems to be used to rate a school's leadership and governance and identify areas for improvement.
Original Description:
page 1
Original Title
Pages from SELF-ASSESSMENT-TOOL-TEMPLATE-PORTRAIT (1)
This document appears to be a school assessment report that evaluates a school's leadership and governance practices. It contains 6 indicators that assess elements such as whether the school has an approved development plan created with stakeholder input, whether the plan is regularly reviewed collaboratively, and whether the school has a clear organizational structure defining roles. For each indicator, it provides the standards and levels of practice (from 0 to 3) to evaluate the school's performance. The document seems to be used to rate a school's leadership and governance and identify areas for improvement.
This document appears to be a school assessment report that evaluates a school's leadership and governance practices. It contains 6 indicators that assess elements such as whether the school has an approved development plan created with stakeholder input, whether the plan is regularly reviewed collaboratively, and whether the school has a clear organizational structure defining roles. For each indicator, it provides the standards and levels of practice (from 0 to 3) to evaluate the school's performance. The document seems to be used to rate a school's leadership and governance and identify areas for improvement.
NAME OF SCHOOL ________________________________________________________________
NAME OF SCHOOL HEAD ________________________________________________________________
CLUSTER _____________________ DISTRICT _________________________________________
PREVIOUS RATING _______________ DATE OF VALIDATION ______________________________
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE (30)
A network of leadership and governance guides the education system to achieve its shared vision, mission, and goals making them responsive and relevant to the context of diverse environments. SELF SDO INDICATOR STANDARD MOVs LEVEL OF PRACTICE RATING RATING 1. In place is a 1. APPROVED School LEVEL 0: Not Evident Development Plan (e.g. Improvement Plan (SIP) SIP developed - Reviewed/Adjusted/Enhanced LEVEL 1 Indicator: The SIP development plan guided by the collaboratively by the Attachments: School school’s vision, mission, and stakeholders of the Memorandum, Letter of goal (VMG) is developed through school and community Invitation, Activity Completion the leadership of the school and Report the participation of 50% community stakeholders. 2. APPROVED Annual Implementation Plan LEVEL 2 Indicator: The Attachments: School development plan is evolved Memorandum, Letter of Invitation, through the shared leadership of Activity Completion Report the school and the participation of 51-80% 3. APPROVED Office community stakeholders. Performance Commitment & Review Form LEVEL 3 Indicator: The Attachments: School development plan is enhanced Memorandum, Minutes of with the 81-100% community the Meeting, ACR, School participation in performing the Organizational Structure, Process leadership roles with the school flow providing technical support.
2. The development 4. Programs, Project, Activities LEVEL 0: Not Evident
plan (e.g. SIP) is (PPAs-Title) as indicated in regularly reviewed by the SIP/AIP/OPCRF LEVEL 1 Indicator: The school Attachments: School leads the regular quarterly the school community Memorandum, Minutes of review and improvement of the to keep it up the Meeting, Project Proposal, development plan responsive and relevant Activity Completion Report to emerging needs, LEVEL 2 Indicator: The school challenges and Innovative Programs for the and 75-80% community opportunities improvement of ACCESS stakeholders working as full partners, lead the quarterly Other regular school programs: review and improvement of the - Wash in School Program, development plan Gulayan sa Paaralan, Feeding Program, Others LEVEL 3 Indicator: The school and 81-100% of the community stakeholders lead 5. Modes of Dissemination the quarterly review and Attachments: School Website, improvement process; the school Facebook stakeholders facilitate the Account Page, process. Leaflets/Brochures/Newsletters, 3. The school is Transparency/Bulletin Board, LEVEL 0: Not Evident School Paper, Communication organized by a clear Plan, Flow and System. LEVEL 1 Indicator: The school structure and work defines the organizational arrangements that 6. School-based implementing structure, and the roles and promote shared guidelines on Child Protection responsibilities of stakeholders. leadership and Policy, Anti-Bullying, etc. governance and define Attachments: LEVEL 2 Indicator: The the roles and ▪ School Memorandum school and 51-80% community responsibilities of the ▪ Consultation Report collaboratively define the (Attendance and Pictures) stakeholders.