▪ TA report with results, learning outcomes, and directly
analysis and pictures improves community life.
▪ Certificates of
Attendance to
Trainings/Seminar
(Division/Region/Nation
al/International)
3. Learners’ Outcome
Attachments:
▪ Performance Indicators
(Drop-Out, Graduation,
Cohort-Survival, etc.)
▪ Learners’ Tracking
System/Progress Report
▪ Learners’ profile with
their learning needs
▪ Learner’s Portfolio
▪ Alternative Delivery
Mode (ADM)
▪ Periodic Assessment
Results with analysis
3. A representative ▪ Summative Test Results
- Proportion of Students
group of school and
performing at proficient level
community - Numeracy Level
stakeholders develop - Literacy Level
the methods and
materials for The results of the reading test
developing creative in Filipino and English and
thinking & problem numeracy test shall be
solving. considered – with reference to
the policy standard set by the
CLMD.
The percentage weight for the
learning outcomes shall be:
10% - Filipino Reading Test
10% - English Reading Test
10% - Numeracy Test
To determine the improvement
of learning outcomes, the
rating standard below shall be
followed:
% of Decrease Rating
76-100% or 0 non- 3
reader/non-
numerates
51-75% 2 community to develop critical,
26-50% 1 creative thinking and problem-
25 and below 0 solving community of learners
Overall
High Proficient 3 all learning areas in all grade
(90-100%)
Proficient (75-89%) 2
Nearly Proficient (50- 1 LEVEL 0: Not Evident
4.The learning systems
74%)
are regularly and 49 below 0
collaboratively
monitored by the
community using 4. School Best Practices/
appropriate tools to Remarkable Accomplishments
ensure the holistic Attachments:
growth and ▪ School initiated
programs/projects
development of the ▪ Log sheet/logbook
learners and the showing names of
community. visitors benchmarked
school’s-initiated
programs
▪ Learners-initiated
projects
▪ Best Practices
▪ Innovations
▪ Programs for
improvement of the
Ineffective approaches are
replaced, and innovative ones are
developed.
Developed localized curriculum in
6 learning areas.
LEVEL 3 Indicator: Best
practices in localizing the
curriculum are mainstreamed and
benchmarked by other schools.
There is marked increase in
number of projects that uses the
community learning laboratory,
and the school as an agent of
change for improvement of the
community.
Developed localized curriculum in
all learning areas.
LEVEL 0: Not Evident
LEVEL 1 Indicator: A
representative group of school and
community stakeholders assess
content and methods used in
teaching creative, critical thinking
and problem solving.
Assessment results are used as
guide to develop materials.
Developed learning materials in 4
learning areas in all grade
levels.
LEVEL 2 Indicator: Learning
materials and approaches to
reinforce strengths and address
deficiencies are developed and
tested for applicability on school,
family, and community.
Developed learning materials in 6
learning areas in all grade
levels.
LEVEL 3 Indicator: Materials
and approaches are being used in
school, in the family and in
and are producing desired results.
Developed learning materials in
levels.
LEVEL 1 Indicator: A school-
based monitoring and learning
system is conducted regularly and
cooperatively; and feedback is
shared with stakeholders.
The system uses a tool that
monitors the holistic development
of learners once a year.
LEVEL 2 Indicator: The school-
based monitoring and learning
systems generate feedback that is
used for making decisions that
enhance the total development of
learners for 2 quarters.
A committee take care of the
continuous improvement of the
tool.