Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AE6504 PROPULSION - II
SEMESTER : V
SYLLABUS
AE6504 PROPULSION - II LTPC
3003
OBJECTIVES:
To impart knowledge in non air-breathing and hypersonic propulsion methods to students so that
they are familiar with various propulsion technologies associated with space launch vehicles,
missiles and space probes.
TEXT BOOKS:
1. Sutton, G.P., “Rocket Propulsion Elements”, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 5th Edition,
1993.
2. Mathur, M.L., and Sharma, R.P., “Gas Turbine, Jet and Rocket Propulsion”, Standard Publishers
and Distributors, Delhi, 1988.
REFERENCES:
1. James Award, "Aerospace Propulsion System"
2. Hieter and Pratt, "Hypersonic Air Breathing Propulsion"
UNIT I
HYPERSONIC AIRBREATHING PROPULSION
Introduction to hypersonic air breathing propulsion- hypersonic vehicles and supersonic
combustion need for supersonic combustion for hypersonic propulsion – salient features of
scramjet engine and its applications for hypersonic vehicles – problems associated with
supersonic combustion – engine/airframe integration aspects of hypersonic vehicles – various
types scramjet combustors – fuel injection schemes in scramjet combustors – one dimensional
models for supersonic combustion using method of influence coefficients.
INTRODUCTION TO SCRAMJET
At higher temperature around 2500K, the walls of ramjet will tend to fail structurally.
Thus, like turbojets, conventional ramjets are also limited by material problem at high flight
Mach numbers. Moreover, if the temperature of the air entering the combustor is too high, when
the fuel is injected, it will be decomposed by the higher temperatures rather than be burned; that
is, the fuel will absorb rather than release energy, and the engine will become a drag machine
rather than a thrust producing device.
The velocity of the incoming air, as seen from the frame of reference of the vehicle or
engine, also represents relative kinetic energy. When the air flow is decelerated by the scramjet,
the relative velocity and kinetic energy both decrease and observation of energy requires that any
missing kinetic energy will reappear as internal energy, with the result that the pressure,
temperature, and density of the flow entering the burner are considerably higher than in the free
stream. When the flight Mach number exceeds about 6, this effect becomes so pronounced that it
is no longer advantages to decelerate the flow to subsonic speeds. Depending upon flight
conditions and details of the diffuser operation, the adverse consequences can include pressures
too high for practical burner structural design, excessive performance losses due to normal shock
wave system, excessive wall heat transfer rates, and combustion conditions that large fraction of
the available chemical energy to dissociation.
A logical way to solve this problem is to only partially compress and decelerate the
oncoming flow, avoiding in particular the normal shock wave system, with the result that the
flow entering the burner is supersonic, the resulting engine is known as a supersonic combustion
ramjet or scramjet.
Even though the diffuser is responsible for some of the desired compression and deceleration
match of it is invariably accomplished by oblique shock waves emanating from the vehicle fore-
body located upstream of the engine. This allows the engine to take advantage of the inevitable
compression of the free stream by the vehicle and reduces the burdens upon the diffuser.
Moreover, since, the diffuser exit flow is supersonic the geometry is entirely convergent. Fuel is
injected in to the supersonic flow just downstream of the diffuser, and the emphasis is upon
achieving rapid and through mixing (especially when all the entering oxygen is to be consumed)
because the time available for the combustion process is short. The heat loads are highest in the
burner primarily because of the combination of the high gas density due to compression, rather
than to the ongoing combustion. The exhaust nozzle need only be divergent because the
accelerating glow is supersonic throughout, and some of the acceleration can take place outside
the confining duct by using the after body of the vehicle as a free expansion surface.
Clearly for hypersonic flight at very high Mach numbers, something else must be done.
This problem has led to the concept of a “supersonic combustion ramjet” and the scramjet. Here,
the flow entering the diffuser is at high Mach number, say M l=M =6. However, the diffuser
decelerates the air flow only enough to obtain a reasonable pressure ratio P 2 /P1 ; the flow is still
supersonic upon entering the combustor. Fuel is added to the supersonic stream, where
supersonic combustion takes place. In this way, the flow field throughout the scramjet is
completely supersonic; in turn, the static temperature remains low, and the material and
decomposition problems associated with the conventional ramjet are circumvented. Therefore
the power plant for a hypersonic transport in the future will most likely be a scramjet.
For the hypersonic regime, it has been proposed that the initial diffusion should be
limited and that combustion should occur at supersonic velocities. If then the heat is added when
M>1, the process occurs along the lower branch of a Rayleigh line and may again take place
until the checking point is reached. The Rayleigh lines are different ones, the specific mass flow,
G=m/A = v being greater for this case although the heat added is less and the efficiency is
lower. It is possible that shock is an adiabatic process and at constant area, all states must be on
the initial Rayleigh line, and constant line, and the total amount of heat added is not changed.
The balance between a conventional ramjet (CRJ) and the supersonic combustion ramjet (SCR
or Scramjet) lies in the efficiencies of the processes (e.g. diffusion) and the initial temperature
level (ie., Mach number). Also these high temperatures, the degree of frozen or equilibrium flow
can have a considerable effect and this is dependent on the fuel. It should be noted that subsonic
combustion necessitates a decrease of static pressure (for Acceleration of the flow) and that
supersonic combustion implies an increase of static pressure (decelerating of the flow) but both
are accompanied by a loss of stagnation pressure. As in indication of performance, Fig 2.10
shows a comparison of a CRJ and a SCRJ at a particular condition.
The successful burning at high velocity is very difficult and the situation is an order of
magnitude higher or more severe. The temperature of course is very much higher, which
promotes very fast combustion. Pressures too are high, again helpful. A fuel like hydrogen is
almost necessary and so is a flow situation which permits some stability. It would seem that a
standing shock wave somewhere is required, produced by wedges on the duct walls or along its
axis or at the discharge of a premixed fuel.
The advantage of the SCRJ, in addition to the lower initial temperature and absence of the
dissociation sink, is in having lower pressures and no subsonic diffusion, hence a saving of
weight in length and strength.
The scramjet uses a slightly modified Brayton Cycle to produce power, similar to that used
for both the classical ramjet and turbine engines. Air is compressed; fuel injected, mixed and
burned to increase the air – or more accurately, the combustion products - temperature and
pressure; then these combustion products are expanded. For the turbojet engine, air is
mechanically compressed by work extracted from the combustor exhaust using a turbine. In
principle, the ramjet and scramjet works the same. The forward motion of the vehicle compresses
the air. Fuel is then injected into the compressed air and burned. Finally, the high-pressure
combustion products expand through the nozzle and over the vehicle after body, elevating the
surface pressure and effectively pushing the vehicle.
Thrust is the result of increased kinetic energy between the initial and final states of the
working fluid, or the summation of forces on the engine and vehicle surfaces.
The different parts of a scramjet engine: air inlet, isolator, combustor and nozzle. With the
actual technology, as it is mentioned in Chapter 3, the scramjet engine must be integrated with
the fuselage of the aircraft, specially the air inlet and the nozzle. Part of the forebody aircraft
fuselage makes the function of air inlet compressing the freestream air, and similarly, the aft
body acts as a nozzle expanding the gases from the combustion.
AIR INLET:
It can be considered as a diffuser in which takes place the compression of the freestream air
gathered. This compression is achieved by successive shock waves. The performance of the air
inlet compression can be separated into two key parameters: capability, or how much
compression is performed, and efficiency, or what level of flow losses does the inlet generate
during the compression process. A common parameter used to quantify the efficiency of the
forebody/inlet compression is the kinetic energy efficiency. The definition is the ratio of the
kinetic energy of the compressed flow would achieve if it were expanded isentropically to
freestream pressure, relative to the kinetic energy of the freestream.
Hypersonic inlets used in scramjets fall into three-different categories, based on the type of
compression that is utilized. These three types are: external compression, mixed compression and
internal compression. A schematic of these types is shown in figure below.
In the external compression all the compression is performed by flow turning in one direction
by shock waves that are external to the engine. These inlet configurations have large cowl drag,
as the flow entering the combustor is at a large angle relative to the freestream flow; however,
external compression inlets are self-starting and spill flow when operated below the design Mach
number (this is a desirable feature for inlets that must operate over a large Mach number range).
In a mixed compression inlet the compression is performed by shocks both external and
internal to the engine, and the angle of the external cowl relative to the freestream can be made
very small to minimize external drag. These inlets are typically longer than external compression
configurations, but also spill flow when operated below the design Mach number. Depending on
the amount of internal compression, however, mixed compression inlets may need variable
geometry in order to start.
In internal compression inlet the compression is performed by shock waves that are internal
to the engine. This type of inlet can be shorter than a mixed compression inlet, but it does not
allow easy integration with the vehicle. It maintains full capture at Mach numbers lower than the
design point, but its most significant limitation is that extensive variable geometry is always
required for it to start.
ISOLATOR:
At flight speeds below Mach 8, combustion in a scramjet engine can generate a large local
pressure rise and separation of the boundary layer on the surfaces of the combustion duct. This
separation, which can feed upstream of fuel injection, acts to further diffuse the core flow in the
duct, and will affect the operation of the inlet, possibly causing an unstart of the engine. The
method use to alleviate this problem is the installation of a short duct between the inlet and the
combustor known as an isolator. In some engines (those which operate in the lower hypersonic
regime between Mach 4 and 8) the combination of the diffusion in the isolator and heat release in
the combustion decelerate the core flow to subsonic conditions, in what is called dual- mode
combustion. At speeds above Mach 8 the increased kinetic energy of the airflow through the
engine means that the combustion generated pressure rise is not strong enough to cause boundary
layer separation. Flow remains attached and supersonic throughout, and this is termed pure
scramjet. In this case an isolator is not necessary.
The structure of the supersonic flow in confined ducts under the influence of a strong adverse
pressure gradient is of interest in the design of scramjet isolators. As shown in figure below, a
pressure gradient is imposed on the incoming supersonic flow, and with the presence of a
boundary layer, a series of crossing oblique shocks are generated.
match the imposed back-pressure. Being able to predict the length scale of this flow structure is
the key component of isolator design for dual-mode scramjets.
COMBUSTOR :
The combustor chamber is a duct where the combustion between freestream air and fuel takes
place. This combustion is supersonic, so there are some aspects that require more attention on the
contrary of the conventional combustion. At very high velocities, a properly fuel injection and
mixing could be a problem, as well as holding the flame. Some techniques used today for fuel
injection in scramjet engines are: wall, ramp, strut, pylon and pulsed injectors. And for keeping
the combustion, there is a technique quite used called cavity flame holders.
Another significant aspect to take into account is the dissociation. At the entrance of the
combustor the flow static temperature and pressure are very high, and with the heat release due
to chemical reactions, the temperature and pressure could reach extremely high values which
involve dissociation of combustion products.
Due to the heat addition, the velocity or Mach number decreases while the static temperature
and pressure increases. The total temperature is raised and the total pressure is reduced. The total
pressure loss is proportional to the square of Mach number; hence, it is better to have a small
combustor inlet Mach number, on the contrary for the dissociation phenomenon.
The fuel used in scramjet engines is hydrogen or hydrocarbons. Hydrogen is most used
because it has more advantages in front of hydrocarbons. The reason for using liquid hydrogen
for scramjet fuel rests with its high specific impulse and its potential for cooling parts of the
vehicle. The heat value (which represents the amount of energy released when a fuel is
combusted) for hydrogen is two and a half times that of hydrocarbons. Another advantage over
hydrocarbons is that hydrogen is a clean fuel as it doesn‟t produce any harmful pollutants like
carbon monoxide (CO) or carbon dioxide (CO2) during the combustion process.
Although it may appear that hydrogen is the ideal fuel for scramjet propulsion it does present
some drawbacks. Liquid hydrogen is not a dense fuel, having a density of only 0.09 kg/m3. For
example, JP-8 on the other hand has a density of 800 kg/m3 in similar conditions, very much
higher. Having a low density does save weight; however, a large volume is needed in order to
store enough chemical energy for practical use.
NOZZLE:
The nozzle is a divergent duct that accelerates the supersonic flow and at the same time
expands it reducing its static temperature and pressure. The expansion process converts the
potential energy of the combusting flow to kinetic energy and then it results in thrust.
The choice of combustor inlet Mach number is a key aspect for the performance of the
scramjet and it is related to the nozzle expansion. If the s tatic temperature at the combustor
entrance is too high, dissociation will be present and then chemical energy is not available as
thermal energy for conversion to kinetic energy in the nozzle.
There is a range of possible applications for scramjet engines, including missile propulsion,
hypersonic cruiser propulsion, and part of a staged space access propulsion system Figure below
displays the approximate performance range in terms of engine spec ific impulse and Mach
number for various types of propulsion systems . It can be seen that at Mach numbers higher than
approximately 6-7, the only available propulsion systems are rockets and scramjets. Compared to
rockets, scramjets have much higher specific impulse levels; therefore, it is clear why it is
advantageous to develop the scramjet, if for this reason only. Contrary to rockets, scramjets do
not require that an oxidizer be carried on board the aircraft as it is an air breathing engine,
collecting oxygen from the atmosphere. This decreases the required weight of the overall
propulsion system and fuel, resulting in a higher allowable payload weight or increased range.
There are other reasons that the development of the scramjet is advantageous as we ll. Air
breathing engines produce higher engine efficiency, have a longer powered range, possess the
ability for thrust modulation to ensure efficient operation, have higher maneuverability, and are
completely reusable .
The general consensus is that hydrogen fuel should be used for air breathing flight faster than
Mach 8-10, due to its “higher cooling capacity” and its faster reactions. Though hydrogen can
perform at higher speeds above the hydrocarbon upper limit, with current capabilities the
hydrogen fueled scramjet will only offer acceptable performance to about Mach 15.
There are many advantages in applying the scramjet as the propulsion system for the second
stage of a two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO), hydrocarbon-fueled aerospace plane. It would provide for a
small TSTO vehicle as well as a small single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) vehicle or military
hypersonic cruiser that uses a hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet.
The rationale for hypersonic missile capability lies in the fact that a Mach 6-8 missile
increases the possible range within a given flight time, or similarly, decreases the flight time
required for a given range.
The goal of scramjet development is to give hypersonic vehicles a more efficient alternative to
rockets. The vehicle that could most quickly benefit from current scramjet research is the cruise
missile; however, a hypersonic cruiser aircraft is an alternative to traditional turbojet
transportation for civilian or military application. Scramjets could also be used in conjunction
with rockets for space launchers, thereby requiring less on-board oxidizer for transport to space.
At high flight speeds, the residence time for atmospheric air ingested into a scramjet inlet and
exiting from the engine nozzle is on the order of a millisecond. Therefore, fuel injected into the
air must efficiently mix within tens of microseconds and react to release its energy in the
combustor. The overall combustion process should be mixing controlled to provide a stable
operating environment; in reality, however, combustion in the upstream portion of the
combustor, particularly at higher Mach numbers, is kinetically controlled where ignition delay
times are on the same order as the fluid scale. Both mixing and combustio n time scales must be
considered in a detailed study of mixing and reaction in a scramjet to understand the flow
processes and to ultimately achieve a successful design.
Airframe structural and heat transfer limitations constrain flight Mach numbers to specific
altitudes and corresponding freestream conditions. Cycle efficiency considerations, together with
temperature limitations imposed by materials and combustion product gas dissociation, dictate
the combustion system entry Mach number and thermodynamic state.
The maximum combustion temperature occurs when hydrocarbon fuel molecules are mixed
with just enough air so that all of the hydrogen atoms form water vapor H 2 0, and all of the
carbon atoms form carbon dioxide C02 .
Gas-phase chemical reactions occur by the exchange of atoms between molecules as a result
of molecular collisions. Consequently, fuel and air must be mixed to near-stoichiometric
proportions at the molecular level before combustion can take place.
Compressible shear/mixing layers and jets provide good model problems for studying the
physical processes occurring in high-speed mixing and reacting flow in a scramjet. Mixing layers
are characterized by large-scale eddies that form due to the high shear that is present between the
fuel and air streams. These eddies entrain fuel and air into the mixing region.
The shock and expansion wave structure in and about the mixing layer can interact with the
turbulence flow field to affect mixing layer growth. Shock and expansion waves interacting with
the layer result from the engine internal structure. Experiments have shown that the shocks that
would result from wall and strut compressions appear to enhance the growth of the two-
dimensional eddy structure (rollers) of a mixing layer.
High speed flight requires proper aerodynamic integration of the ramjet or scramjet with the
remainder of the vehicle. It is found, for example, that making hypersonic engines axisymmetric
and attaching them to the vehicle by means of pylons or struts can produce enough external drag
on the pylon and the cowl to virtually cancel the internal thrust, and creates internal passages so
narrow that the flow is dominated by wall effects and difficult to manage. Furthermore, this
configuration cannot easily capitalize on the vehicle surfaces for compression and expansion.
The recent engineering design work on aerospace planes has shown that success is also
dependent upon careful integration of engine and airframe structures, materials, cooling,
controls, and subsystems. As the vehicles fly to the very high altitudes necessary to avoid the
excessive pressures that would result from hypersonic speeds, they also fly where the air is very
rare, the density being only one hundredth or one-thousandth or less of the sea level value. Air
breathing engines require airflow in order to generate the thrust that lifts and accelerates the
vehicle, and they cannot be allowed to suffocate.
One way to capture the required airflow is to use the entire fore body underneath the vehicle
as a compression surface, shaping it carefully for high efficiency, and recognizing that, since the
air has no warning of the presence of the vehicle until it encounters the first oblique shock wave,
a stream tube of air enormously larger than the physical opening of the engine inlet can be
directed into the engine, as shown in figure below. Once inside the engine, the air that has been
compressed and burned would then require a nozzle exit area even larger than the original free
stream capture area in order to make good on the available thrust, but a conventional nozzle of
this geometry would be too cumbersome to carry along. Instead, the entire after body underneath
the vehicle is used as a free expansion surface, and the entire underside of the vehicle must be
carefully designed to accommodate engine performance under all flight conditions.
Operating efficiently and reliably over an extraordinarily large range of flight conditions,
including Mach numbers from 0 to 25 (orbital speed) and altitudes from sea level to the top of
the atmosphere.
It is the fact that practical aerospace plane configurations allow only one "hole" for the engine,
and that ramjets and scramjets produce no thrust while standing still or when the atmosphere is
too thin, and further complicated because the airframe and engine are totally integrated, not only
with regard to generating net thrust, but also inevitably from the standpoint of the ordinary
"aerodynamic" effects such as lift and drag forces and stability and control moments.
The current challenges in the development of the scramjet engine can be gathered in three
main areas: air inlet, combustion, and structures and materials.
Air inlet :
The overall performance of a scramjet is largely dictated by the aerodynamic
performance, geometric size, and weight of the hypersonic inlets. Commonly, hypersonic inlets
have a wide Mach number range, but the shock-on- lip condition can be met only at the design
Mach number, since shock angles vary with the upstream Mach numbers. Thus, at Mac h
numbers higher than the design one, the ramp shocks move inside the inlet and evolve into a
strong incident shock, causing strong slip layers, remarkable total pressure loss, boundary- layer
separation, and possible engine unstart. At Mach numbers lower than the design one, the ramp
shocks move away from the cowl lip, causing loss of the precompressed airflow and the so-
called spillage drag. To avoid these performance penalties at offdesign conditions, the control of
the ramp shock system is needed. Hence, variable geometric approaches for ramp shock control
are widely considered and studied.
Combustion :
Supersonic combustion is very difficult to maintain and continues to be a formidable task. the
largest problem associated with combustion is the mixing between freestream air and fuel. If fuel
cannot be properly injected and mixed into the air stream it will not ignite, regardless of pressure,
temperature or equivalence ratio. Due to compressibility effects, fuel injection presents
challenging obstacles. The air stream is at such a high pressure and velocity, that fuel injected
into the stream has a tendency to be pushed against the wall and rendered ineffective. In addition
to the problem of mixing, ignition and flame holding at these high velocities is extremely
difficult. Another challenge to increase the performance is the need of a variable geometry
combustion chamber. A fixed geometry combustor associated to a variable capture area air inlet
does not benefit from the enhanced efficiency of the air inlet. A fully variable geometry – air
inlet + combustion chamber – can increase the performance.
Structures and materials :
A rocket that passes nearly vertically through the atmosphere on its way to orbit, a scramjet
would take a more leveled trajectory. Because of the thrust-to-weight ratio of a scramjet being
low compared to modern rockets, the scramjet needs more time to accelerate. Such a depressed
trajectory implies that the vehicle stays a long time in the atmosphere at hypersonic speeds,
causing atmospheric friction to become a problem. This is not only for space launch applications
but also in missile or commercial transport applications. Heat addition produced by the
combustion at these high velocities and temperatures is another significant factor to take into
account. Therefore, the materials chosen for the structure must have good properties and be
adequate in front of these phenomena. Furthermore, cooling of the engine‟s structure by fuel or
radiation is essential.
Summarize the challenges of SCRAMJET development:
Developing the analytical tools that enable confident control over the engine design and
reliable prediction of the actual behavior.
Proving that the aerospace plane and engine are ready for routine operations by means of
analysis, ground testing, and flight testing of experimental vehicles.
A. Inlet Flow:
For a subsonic combustion ramjet the captured supersonic airflow is first decelerated in a
supersonic diffuser to a lower supersonic Mach number, then brought to subsonic conditions
through a normal shock system, and finally diffused further to a lower subsonic Mach number.
This action is typically accomplished by a supersonic diffuser employing a number of oblique
shocks and a throat section followed by a subsonic diffuser. Obviously for a scramjet inlet, only
a supersonic diffuser is required. Consequently, the question of how much supersonic diffusion
or inlet compression should be provided at the entrance of the supersonic combustor becomes an
important issue. The answer involves integration of the design of the inlet, combustor, and
nozzle such that the required engine performance is achieved at acceptable weight, operational
reliability, and cost.
B. COMBUSTOR FLOW:
Heat release rate of hydrogen over a wide range of pressure and temperature, often
further accelerated by the presence of local shock waves from nonaxial fuel injection into the
airstream, the actual combustion pressure rise can be expected to be rather abrupt with an
initially high adverse pressure gradient .This sharp pressure gradient coupled with the
impracticality of scramjet inlet Boundary Layer removal for such high-temperature flow raises
the concern of Boundary Layer separation.
The assumption of 100% mixing implies that provided adequate combustor length ER = 1
mixing of the fuel and air is achieved homogeneously in the combustor. The assumption of
equilibrium chemistry implies that for steady flow the specie concentrations are not (or no
longer) a function of time (forward and backward reactions occur at the same rate). Because the
individual chemical reactions require a finite time for completion as a function of pressure and
temperature, the preceding calculations also implied that the combustor was long enough for the
finite rate chemical reactions to reach equilibrium. Consequently, if the combustor length is not
long enough, then the net heat release for stoichiometric combustion of hydrogen is reduced.
TYPES OF COMBUSTORS:
1. STEP COMBUSTOR:
One design approach to the Boundary Layer separation problem is the use of a step
combustor as schematically illustrated in figure below. The resulting A^/A2 > 1 provides a basis
for accommodating the combustor pressure rise. Fuel is typically injected in close proximity to
the base of the step, which can also provide small subsonic recirculation regions for ignition and
flame holding. Boundary- layer separation occurs downstream of the station 2 interface but is
only a concern in that the resulting fuel injection and combustion- induced step pressure must not
subject the station 2 Boundary Layer to such a high back pressure that significant upstream
separation results.
The step combustor can be a design solution when Boundary Layer separation is likely to
occur in a constant-area combustor. The step area increase provides a mechanism for
accommodating wall forces resulting from fuel injection and combustion pressures P step >P2
without separating the inlet Boundary Layer.
2. ISOLATOR COMBUSTORS:
Another design solution when Boundary Layer separation is likely to occur in a constant
area combustor is the use of an inlet isolator in conjunction with an increased area combustor.
The increased area combustor could be a step combustor, a divergent-area wall combustor, or a
combination. The isolator section is intended to provide the length required for precombustion
increase of the inlet pressure to the combustor pressure level without unstarting the inlet.
Typically, such backpressuring of the viscous inlet flow is accomplished by a shock train (close-
coupled series of shock-wave Boundary Layer interactions). The isolator is designed to contain
this shock train, thus preventing it from extending further upstream into the inlet compression
system. The higher the combustor back pressure, the greater the throttling required, and
consequently the smaller is the flow area A2A required to satisfy the conservation equations at
the isolator exit.
A. WALL JETS:
Wall jets, although minimizing intrusion of the combustor flow path, result in a relatively
complex flow structure in the immediate vicinity of the jets as characterized shown below in
figure for normal injection through a round hole on a flat plate. The resulting regions of high-
pressure gradient on the wall near the jet are also a source of increased local heat flux.
When in- line jets are spaced too far apart, the benefit of increased momentum flux per unit
frontal area is likely to diminish, approaching single hole performance in the limit. On the other
hand, too close an axial spacing could also be a problem in terms of constraining fore and aft
expansion (high-pressure jet proximity) at the expense of the frontal area increasing lateral
expansion.
B. IN-STREAM INJECTORS:
Fuel jets can be vertically spaced as required to achieve desired local F/A distribution across
the entire combustor height, matching even non uniform flow air profiles. For fuel injected from
the sidewalk or out of the top of in-stream injectors, much of the previous discussion of wall jets
applies. For fuel injected axially downstream from the trailing edge, full axial fuel momentum is
also achieved but at what can be a significant mixing rate penalty. At high combustor velocities
such axial injection can lead to increased distance (combustor length) to achieve adequate
mixing. The major issues are thermal protection and structural integrity.
C. HYPERMIXERS:
In hypermixer type axial downstream fuel injection permits maximum momentum recovery
from the fuel (the importance of which increases with flight Mach number). Vortex shedding
from the corners, step-type recirculation behind the aft surfaces, and impingement of the
reflected ramp shock just aft of the injectors are relied upon to enhance the otherwise relatively
slow mixing of the axially injected hydrogen.
The fuel injector ramp and reflected shocks are a source of non combustion entropy increase and
unlike well-designed inlet compression ramps they do not provide permanent increased inlet
contraction for the losses incurred. Intentional creation of vortices for mixing enhancement also
introduces additional axial momentum losses. the challenge of the hypermixer concept is to
achieve adequate mixing of near axially injected fuel in reasonable combustor lengths without
increasing drag.
D. MIXING:
Scramjet combustors primarily dependent on free shear- layer mixing (such as unenhanced
simple axial fuel injection) can be expected to require an unacceptably long length to achieve
acceptable mixing. Fuel injector designs that introduce curved shock waves and local Boundary
Layer separation increase the rotationality of the flow and the losses induced provide near-field
mixing over that of free shear flow. Combustion in the near and far field, along with induced
vortices, also increases mixing relative to free shear flow.
When M > 1, it can be seen from inspection of Eq. (6-90) that occluding the flow, either by
decreasing A or by increasing Tt, causes M to decrease in the axial direction. Conversely,
relieving the flow, either by increasing A or decreasing Tt , will cause M to increase. However, in
the dual- mode combustion system, A(x) will never decrease with x, as there is no physical throat,
and Tt(x) will never decrease.
A(x) and Tt(x) are chosen as independent variables, and their coefficients are the influence
coefficients of the respective independent variables on the single dependent variable M. for
supersonic combustion (scramjet mode), both mixing and chemical heat release rates are greatest
at onset, and relax asymptotically toward their respective fully- mixed and chemical equilibrium
(or kinetically frozen) zero-rate values with infinite convective time or distance.
The axial total temperature gradient dTt/dx is greatest shortly after ignition, usually near
burner entry, and decreases to its least value at burner e xit. For a wide variety of scramjet mixers,
and to represent both mixing transition delay and induction or ignition delay, Tt(x) can be
usefully represented in non dimensional form by a rational function given by
into itself by the effective area blockage of the separated flow near the wall, and is compressed
into a confined core flow through an oblique shock train, until the confined core flow pressure
matches the pressure in the region of separated flow in the burner.
UNIT II
FUNDAMENTALS OF CHEMICAL ROCKET PROPULSION
Operating principle – specific impulse of a rocket – internal ballistics – performance
considerations of rockets – types of igniters- preliminary concepts in nozzle-less propulsion – air
augmented rockets – pulse rocket motors – static testing of rockets & instrumentation –safety
considerations
A rocket motor is a device for converting the thermo chemical energy of one or more
propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy: the term “propellants” is applied to any material.
Solid or liquid, consumed in the rocket motor. It is generally assumed, and there is some
evidence to support the assumption, that under the pressures and temperatures occurring in a
rocket motor combustion chamber and nozzle the chemical reactions take place under conditions
which approach chemical equilibrium.
The chemicals utilized for producing the high-pressure, high – temperature gases in a
rocket motor are either solids or liquids, but for certain special applications the reaction of gases,
like gaseous hydrogen with gaseous oxygen, must be useful. Regardless of the type of propeller
(or propellant), the main objective is to produce the largest possible jet velocity. Since the
pressure of the gases enthalpy the exhaust nozzle ranges from 250 to 3000psi and the back
pressure is 14.7psi or less, the exhaust nozzle alwa ys operates under supercritical conditions.
Hence if the isentropic flow is assumed the gas speed in the throat of the nozzle will be the
critical speed of sound a* , which is dependant of the basic pressure. Furthermore, to obtain the
largest possible values of jet speed, the exhaust gases are always the converging-diverging the
exhaust gases are always ejected with supersonic speed.
Thrust :
Thrust is useful to begin by examining the performance of a rocket under static tests. Consider
the thrust of a stationary rocket indicated schematically in figure below for simplicity, the flow
may be assumed one dimensional, with a steady exit velocity Ve and propellant flow rate &
consider a stationary control surface “S” which interests the jet perpendicularly through the exit
plane of the nozzle. Positive thrust “T” acts in the opposite direction to V e. The reaction to the
thrust is shown in fig as it acts on the control volume. If the expelled fluid can be considered a
continuum, it is necessary to consider the pressures just inside the exit plane of the nozzle, pe ,the
cross-sectional area of the jet Ae is the exit area of the nozzle.
∑ ∫ ∫ (2.1)
Where
= density of fluid
v = Volume
In words the resultant force acting on the control volume is equal to the time rate of
increase of linear momentum with in the control volume flux the nut efflux of linear momentum
from the control volume.
Where, the subscripts CV and CS denote the control volume and control surface
respectively.
Since Ux is zero within the propellant tank or tanks, and the flow is steady within the thrust
chamber, the time derivative term is zero. Also the momentum – flux can be written as
∑ ∫ (2.2)
Considering the pressure on the control surface to be uniformly Pa. expect the plane of the jet,.
The force summation may be written
∑ - (2.3)
Thrust is actually a result of pressure or stress distribution over interior and exterior surface, as
shown typically for a chemical rocket in figure.
mVe = - (2.4)
If the pressure in the exhaust plane is the same as the ambient the pressure, the thrust is given by
= mVe
T = m Vj (2.5)
Where
The impulse per unit mass of propellant will be shown to be an important performance
variable. If the effective exhaust velocity Vj is constant equation shows that the total impulse I
imparted to the vehicle during acceleration is
I= ∫ (2.7)
Where, m = the total mass of expelled propellant. This impulse per unit mass of propellant is
therefore,
= = (2.8)
Isp = = (2.9)
Where, g is the acceleration due to gravity at the earth‟s surface. The presence of g in the
definition is arbitrary, but it does have the advantage that n all common systems of units the
specific impulse is expressed in seconds.
Analysis of an Ideal Rocket: Chemical rockets, whether powered by liquid or solid propellants,
consist in varying complexity of propellant supply and feed system, a combustion chamber, and
exhaust nozzle. To simplify our analysis of the thrust chamber, we assume the following.
7. The propellant flow is steady and constant. The expansion of the working fluid is uniform
and study, without vibration. Transient effects (i.e. start up and shut down) are of very
short duration and may be neglected.
8. All exhaust gases leaving the rocket have an axially directed velocity.
9. The gas velocity, pressure, temperature, and density are all uniform across any section
normal to the nozzle axis.
10. Chemical equilibrium is established with in the rocket chamber and the gas composition
does not change in the nozzle (frozen flow)
11. Stored propellants are at room temperature. Cryogenic propellants are at their boiling
points.
Assuming adiabatic nozzle expansion, the energy equation requires constant stagnation enthalpy
in the nozzle.
h02 = h0e
(2.10)
Putting Cp in terms of universal gas constant R0 , molecular weight M, and ratio of specific heats
, we get
(2.11)
If Q is the heat supplied in the form of chemical energy per u nit mass of propellant, we get
(2.12)
From Eqn 2.11 we can write
(2.13)
If At is the area of the throat of the nozzle and Pt the pressure at throat it can be proved that the
mass flow rate is given by
(2.14)
(2.15)
putting eqn 2.13 & 2.14 in 2.15
FT
CF
Pc A t
Pc A t
C*
ejects
m
• Calculated from standard test data.
• It is independent of nozzle performance and is therefore used as a measure of
combustion efficiency – dominated by T (combustion chamber temperature).
c
The parameters that govern the burning state and mass discharge rate of motors are called
internal ballistic properties; they include r, k, k, p, and the influences caused by pressures,
propellants ingredients, gas velocity, or acceleration.
K = A6 /A1
r - burning rate.
nozzle. The entropy remains constant during a reversible (isentropic) nozzle expansion, but in
real nozzle flows it increases slightly.
The thrust, depends upon the pressure in the combustion chamber, the properties of the
propellant and the geometrical shape of the rocket. To obtain high thrust the molecular weight of
the propellants must be as low as possible.
Another factor which limits the thrust obtainable is the maximum allowable temperature as
well as the maximum temperature which can be produced by chemical reactions. At very high
temperatures, dissociation does not allow the whole of the heat energy to be converted into the
kinetic energy and the maximum obtainable temperatures are limited.
The effect of the characteristics of the propellant and the area-ratio of the nozzle and its shape
also play an important part in dictating the performance of the chemical rocket as it affects the
velocities obtainable as well as the drag on the rocket.
The optimum expansion condition is that when the static pressure at the exit of the rocket
nozzle is the same as the ambient pressure. The length of the diverging nozzle passage is
increased over that corresponding to the optimum expansion ratio (P a =pe) ; this will result in
further expansion in the nozzle and pressure at exit of the nozzle will be less than ambient
pressure pa .
On the other hand, any length of the nozzle which is less than that corresponding to Pe=Pa
will result in lesser expansion and hence in reduced exhaust velocity and thrust will again be
reduced. So the condition Pe=pa gives the best expansion condition for a rocket nozzle with a
given threat diameter.
PYROTECHNIC IGNITERS
In industrial practice, pyrotechnic igniters are defined as igniters (other than pyrogen-type
igniters as defined further on) using solid explosives or energetic propellant- like chemical
formulations (usually small pellets of propellant which give a large burning surface and a short
burning time) as the heat-producing material.
This definition fits a wide variety of designs, known as bag and carbon igniters, powder can,
plastic case, pellet basket, perforated tube, combustible case, jellyroll, string, or sheet igniters.
The common pellet-basket design in figure below is typical of the pyrotechnic igniters. Ignition
of the main charge, in this case pellets consisting of 24% boron-71% potassium perchlorate-5%
binder, is accomplished by stages; first, on receipt of an electrical signal the initiator releases the
energy of a small amount of sensitive powdered pyrotechnic housed within the initiator,
commonly called the squib or the primer charge; next, the booster charge is ignited by heat
released from the squib; and finally, the main ignition charge propellants are ignited.
PYROGEN IGNITERS:
A pyrogen igniter is basically a small rocket motor that is used to ignite a larger rocket
motor. The pyrogen is not designed to produce thrust. All use one or more nozzle orifices, both
sonic and supersonic types, and most use conventional rocket motor grain formulations and
design technology. Heat transfer from the pyrogen to the motor grain is largely convective, with
the hot gases contacting the grain surface as contrasted to a highly radiative energy emitted by
pyrotechnic igniters. For pyrogen igniters the initiator and the booster charge are very similar to
the designs used in pyrotechnic igniters. Reaction products from the main charge impinge on the
surface of the rocket motor grain, producing motor ignition. Common practice on the very large
motors is to mount externally, with the pyrogen igniter pointing its jet up through the large motor
nozzle.
When transposed into the arm position, the ignition flame can be reliably propagated to the
igniter's booster and main charges.
Electric initiators in motor igniters are also called squibs, glow plugs, primers, and sometimes
headers; they always constitute the initial element in the ignition train and, if properly designed,
can be a safeguard against unintended ignition of the motor.
Both (a) and (b) structurally form a part of the rocket motor case and generically are headers.
In the integral diaphragm type (a) the initial ignition energy is passed in the form of a shock
wave through the diaphragm activating the acceptor charge, with the diaphragm remaining
integral. This same principle is also used to transmit a shock wave through a metal case wall or a
metal insert in a filament-wound case; the case would not need to be penetrated and sealed. The
header type (b) resembles a simple glow plug with two high-resistance bridgewires buried in the
initiator charge. The exploding bridgewire design (c) employs a small bridgewire (0.02 to 0.10
mm) of low-resistance material, usually platinum or gold, that is exploded by application of a
high voltage discharge.
The nozzleless solid rocket motor is in reality an advanced mass fraction system. By avoiding
the inherent weight penalty of a nozzle, the nozzleless motor potentially offers improved payload
or terminal velocity capability. The nozzleless motor could also be simple, low cost and reliable.
The attractiveness of nozzleless solid rocket motors is due not only to cost savings and
simplification but their increased potential for flight missions. Using the terminal velocity or V
capability of a rocket as a rmeasure of performance, nozzleless rockets may be compared to
conventional rockets. The ideal V equation is:
By simply removing the nozzle from the conventional motor and firing it, about 70 percent of
its standard total impulse is achieved. The most important reason is the propellant burn rate.
Conventional motors are generally designed for operation In the pressure regime of 1000 to 2000
psi. Burn rates and nozzle sizes are matched appropriately. Port areas are usually much larger
than the throat area in the motors to avoid erosive burning. When the nozzle is removed, they
port becomes the throat, thus reducing the chamber pressure and propellant burn rate. The lower
pressures result in lower total impulse. Decreasing the burn rate of the propellant without
changing other motor parameters can thus have a significant effect upon the delivered total
impulse. A motor designed for operation without a nozzle would use the volume originally taken
up by the nozzle for additional propellant; would have a higher web fraction; would use a
propellant having more desirable propellant properties (such as a low pressure exponent); and
would probably have a lighter case. All these changes would greatly enhance the comparison
between nozzleless and conventional motors in terms of performance.
Elimination of the nozzle from a conventional rocket motor will result in a 30 percent
decrease in total impulse. By placing additional propellant in the volume originally occupied by
the nozzle, utilizing improved grain design, and selecting proper propellant3, the decrease in
total impulse can be reduced to 10 percent or less. Preliminary studies indicate that nozzleless
motors would cost 20 to 30 percent less than the conventional motors, and the use of nozzleless
rocket motors appears to be attractive for small, unguided, air-launched solid rockets.
SHORTCOMINGS:
Considerable development is necessary to operate at low pressure and to avoid the instability
problem. It is assumed that proper propellant tailoring and grain design could accomplish stable
operation. In addition, the nozzleless motor designs thus far envisioned cannot accommodate the
traditional fins necessary for flight stability.
The principles of the rocket and ramjet can be combined so that the two propulsion systems
operate in sequence and in tandem and yet utilize a common combustion chamber and volume.
The low-volume configuration, known as an integral rocket-ramjet, can be attractive in air
launched missiles using ramjet propulsion. The transitio n from the rocket to the ramjet requires
enlarging the exhaust nozzle throat (usually by ejecting rocket nozzle parts), opening the ramjet
air inlet-combustion chamber interface, and following these two events with the normal ramjet
starting sequence.
A solid fuel ramjet uses a grain of solid fuel that gasifies or ablates and reacts with air. Good
combustion efficiencies have been achieved with a patented boron-containing solid fuel
fabricated into a grain similar to a solid propellant and burning in a manner similar to a hybrid
rocket propulsion system.
A pulsed rocket motor is typically defined as a multiple Pulse (physics) solid-fuel rocket motor.
This design overcomes the limitation of solid propellant motors that they cannot be easily shut
down and reignited. The pulse rocket motor allows the motor to be burned in segments (or
pulses) that burn until completion of that segment. The next segment (or pulse) can be ignited on
command by either an onboard algorithm or in pre-planned phase. All of the segments are
contained in a single rocket motor case as opposed to staged rocket motors. The pulsed rocket
motor is made by pouring each segment of propellant separately. Between each segment is
a barrier that prevents the other segments from burning until ignited. At ignition of a second
pulse the burning of the propellant generally destroys the barrier.
The benefit of the pulse rocket motor is that by the command ignition of the subsequent pulses,
near optimal energy management of the propellant burn can be accomplished. Each pulse can
have different thrust level, burn time, and achieved specific impulse depending on the type of
propellant used, its burn rate, its grain design, and the current nozzle throat diameter.
4. Systems for handling heavy or awkward assemblies, supplying liquid propellant, and
providing maintenance, security, and safety.
5. For highly toxic propellants and toxic plume gases it has been required to capture the
hazardous gas or vapor (firing inside a closed duct system), remove almost all of the hazardous
ingredients (e.g., by wet scrubbing and/or chemical treatment), allow the release of the nontoxic
portion of the cleaned gases, and safely dispose of any toxic solid or liquid residues from the
chemical treatment. With an exhaust gas containing fluorine, for example, the removal of much
of this toxic gas can be achieved by scrubbing it with water that contains dissolved calcium; it
will then form calcium fluoride, which can be precipitated and removed.
6. In some tests specialized test equipment and unique facilities are needed to conduct static
testing under different environmental conditions or under simulated emergency conditions. For
example, high and low ambient temperature tests of large motors may require a temperature-
controlled enclosure around the motor; a rugged explosion-resistant facility is needed for bullet
impact tests of propellant- loaded missile systems and also for cook-off tests, where gasoline or
rocket fuel is burned with air below a stored missile. Similarly, special equipment is needed for
vibration testing, measuring thrust vector forces and moments in three dimensions, or
determining total impulse for very short pulse durations at low thrust.
9.Visual observations (flame configuration, test article failures, explosions) using high-speed
cameras or video cameras.
10.Special quantities such as turbopump shaft speed, liquid levels in propellant tanks, burning
rates, flame luminosity, or exhaust gas composition.
Prior to performing any test, it is common practice to train the test crew and go through repeated
dry runs, to familiarize each person with his or her responsibilities and procedures, including the
emergency procedures.
Typical personnel and plant security or safety provisions in a modern test facility include the
following:
1. Concrete-walled blockhouse or control stations for the protection of personnel and instruments
remote from the actual rocket propulsion location.
2. Remote control, indication, and recording of all hazardous operations and measurements;
isolation of propellants from the instrumentation and control room.
UNIT III
SOLID ROCKET PROPULSION
Salient features of solid propellant rockets – selection criteria of solid propellants- estimation of
solid propellant adiabatic flame temperature - propellant grain design considerations – erosive
burning in solid propellant rockets – combustion instability – strand burner and T-burner –
applications and advantages of solid propellant rockets.
The nozzle accelerates the hot gas; it is made of high temperature materials (usually graphite
and/or an ablative material to absorb the heat) to withstand the high temperature. The majority of
all solid rockets have a simple fixed nozzle. as shown here, b ut some nozzle have provision to
rotate it slightly so as to control the direction of the thrust to allow vehicle steering.
The perfect gas equation p V = RT applies very closely to high temperature gases. Here V is the
specific volume or the volume per unit mass of gas mixture, and the gas constant R for the
mixture is obtained by dividing the universal gas constant R' (8314.3 J/kg- mol-K) by the average
molecular mass (often erroneously called the molecular weight) of the gas mixture.
In most rocket propulsion the heat of reaction is determined for a constant-pressure combustion
process. In general the heat of reaction can be determined from sums of the heats of formation of
the products and the reactants, namely
The chemical reaction occurs instantaneously but isothermally at the reference temperature,
and the resulting energy release then heats the gases from this reference temperature to the final
combustion temperature. The heat of reaction is
Here h is the increase in enthalpy for each species multiplied by its molar fraction, and Cp is
the molar specific heat at constant pressure.
Once the gases reach the nozzle, they experience an adiabatic, reversible expansion process
which is accompanied by a drop in temperature and pressure and a conversion of thermal energy
into kinetic energy.
4. Increase the heat of combustion of the binder and (or the plasticizer).
5. Imbed wires or metal staples in the propellant.
A side from the propellant formulation and propellant manufacturing process, burning rate in a
full scale motor can be increased by the following
i. Combustion chamber pressure.
ii. Initial temperature of the solid propellant prior to start.
iii. Combustion gas temperature.
iv. Velocity of the gas flow parallel to the burning surface.
v. Motor motion (acceleration and spin-induced grain stress)
Burning rate date are usually obtained in three ways namely, from testing by:
i. Standard strand burner, often called craw ford burners
ii. Small scale ballistic evaluation motors.
iii. Full scale motors with good instrumentation.
The burning rate of propellant in the motor is a function of many parameters, and at any instant
governs to the mass flow rate m of hot gas generated and flowing form the motor (stable
combustion)
m=Ab X r X pb
Here, A b is the burning of the propellant grain; r is the burning rate, and p b is the solid propellant
density prior to motor start. The total mass “m” of the effective propellant burned can be
determined by integration the equation.
m=ʃ m dt = pb Ar X r dt
Where Ab and r vary with the time and pressure.
Where r - the burn rate is usually in centimeters per second and the chamber pressure „a‟ is an
empirical constant influenced by ambient grain temperature. This equation applies to all the
commonly used double – base, composite, or composite double-base propellants. Also „a‟ is
known as the temperature co-efficient and it is not dimensionless. The burning rate exponent „n‟
sometimes called the combustion index, is independent of the in initial grain temperature and
describes the influence of chamber pressure on the burning rate. The change in ambient
temperature does not change the chemical energy released in the combustion; it merely changes
the rate of reaction at which energy is released.
For a particular propellant and for wide temperature and pressure limit s, the burning rate can
vary by factor of 3 or 4. For all propellants, they range form about 0.05to 75mm/sec; The high
values are difficult to achieve, even with considerable burning rate catalyst additives, embedded
metal wires, or high pressures (above 14Mpa or 2000Mpa)
The burning rate very sensitive to the exponent n for stable operation, n values greater then O
and less than, I, High values of n give a rapid change of burning rate with pressure. This implies
that even a small change in chamber pressure produces substantial changes in the amount of hot
gas produced. Most production propellants have a pressure exponent n ranging between 0.2 and
0.6. In practice, as „n‟ approaches 1, burning rate and chamber pressure become very sensitive to
one another and disastrous rise in chamber pressure can occur in a few milliseconds. When the
„n‟ value is low and comes closed to zero, burning can become unstable and may even
extinguish itself. Some propellants display a negative „n‟ which is very important for „re storable‟
motors or gas generators. A propellant having a wide pressure range. Plate an propellants are
those that exhibit a nearly constant burning rate over a limited pressure range.
The sensitivity of burning rate to propellant temperature can be expressed in the form of
temperature co-efficient,
[ ] [ ]
[ ] [ ]
linking or curing the liquid binder polymer with a small amount of curing agent, and curing it in
an oven, where it becomes hard and solid. In the past three decades the composite propellants
have been the most commonly used class. They have further subdivided below.
1. Conventional composite propellants usually contain between 60 and 72% ammonium per
chlorate (AP) as crystalline oxidizer, up to 22% aluminum powder (AI) as a metal fuel, and 8 to
16% of elastomeric binder (organic polymer) including its plasticizer.
2. Modified composite propellant where an energetic nitramine (HMX or RDX) is added for
obtaining a little more performance and also a somewhat higher density.
3. Modified composite propellant where an energetic plasticizer such as nitroglycerine (used in
double-base propellant) is added to give a little more performance. Sometimes HMX is also
added.
4. A high energy composite solid propellant (with some aluminum), where the organic
elastomeric binder and plasticizer are largely replaced by energetic materials (such as certain
explosives) and where some of the AP is replaced by HMX. Some of these are called elastomer-
modifier cast double-base propellants (EMCDB). Most are experimental propellants. He
theoretical specific impulse can be between 270 and 275 sec at standard conditions.
5. A lower energy composite propellant, where ammonium nitrate (AN) is the cr ystalline
oxidizer (no AP). It is used for gas generator propellant. If a large amount of HMX is added, it
can become a minimum smoke propellant with fair performance.
Propellants can be classified by the density of the smoke in the exhaust plume as smoky
reduced smoke, or minimum smoke (essentially smoke- less). Aluminium powder, a desirable
fuel ingredient, is oxidized to aluminium oxide, which forms visible small solid smoke particles
in the exhaust gas. Most composite propellant are smoky. By reducing the aluminum content in-
composite propellant, the amount of smoke is also reduced. Carbon (Soot) partials and metal
oxide, such as zirconium oxide or iron oxide, can also be visible if in high enough concentration.
The safety rating for detonation can distinguish propellants as a potentially detonable
material (class 1.1) or as a non-detonable materials (class 1.3). Examples of class 1.1 propellant
are a double-base propellants and composite propellants containing a significant proportion of
solid explosive (e.g., HMX or RDX), together with certain other ingredients.
Propellants can be classified by some of the principal manufacturing processes that are
used. Cast propellant is made by mechanical mixing of solid and liquid ingredients, followed by
casting and curing; it is the most common process for composite propellants. Curing of many
cast propellants is by chemical reaction between binder and curing agent at elevated temperature
(45 to 150 C) or hardened by a non chemical process such crystallization. Propellant can also be
made by a salvation process (dissolving a plasticizer in a solid palletized matrix, whose volume
is expanded ). Extruded propellant is made by mechanical mixing (rolling into sheets) followed
by extrusion (pushing through a die at high pressure). Salvation and extrusion process apply
primarily to double-base propellants.
Propellants have also been classified by their principal ingredient. Such as the principal
oxidizer (ammonium per chlorate propellants, ammonium nitrate propellants. or azide-type
propellants) or their principal binder or fuel ingredient and also by prope llants with toxic and
nontoxic exhaust gases.
Free-standing grains can more easily be replaced if the propellant grain has aged excessively.
Cartridge- loaded grains are used in some small tactical missiles and a few medium-sized motors.
They often have a lower cost and are easier to inspect. The case-bonded grains give a somewhat
better performance, a little less inert mass (no holding device, support pads, and less insulation),
a better volumetric loading fraction, are more highly stressed, and often somewhat more difficult
and expensive to manufacture. Today almost all larger motors and many tactical missile motors
use case bonding.
Definitions and terminology important to grains include:
Configuration: The shape or geometry of the initial burning surfaces of a grain as it is
intended to operate in a motor.
Cylindrical Grain: A grain in which the internal cross section is constant along the axis
regardless of perforation shape.
Neutral Burning:Motor burn time during which thrust, pressure, and burning surface area
remain approximately constant, typically within about =15%. Many grains are neutral burning.
Perforation: The central cavity port or flow passage of a propellant grain; its cross section
may be a cylinder, a star shape, etc.
Progressive Burning: Burn time during which thrust, pressure, and burning surface area
increases
Regressive Burning: Burn time during which thrust, pressure, and burning surface area
decreases
Silver: Unburned propellant remaining (or lost – that is, expelled through the nozzle) at the
time of web burnout.
Burning time, Or Effective Burning Time, tb : Usually, the interval from 10% maximum
initial pressure (or thrust) to web burnout, with web burnout usually taken as the aft tangent-
bisector point on the pressure-time trace.
Action Time, Ta: The burning time plus most of the time to burn silvers; typically, the interval
between the initial and final 10% pressure 9or thrust) points on the pressure-time trace.
Deflagration limit: The minimum pressure at which combustion can still be barely self
sustained and maintained without adding energy. Below this pressure the combustion cases
altogether or may be erratic and unsteady with the plume appearing and disappearing
periodically.
Inhibitor: A layer or coating of slow or non burning material (usually, a polymeric rubber type
with filler materials) applied (glued, painted, dipped, or sprayed) to a part of the grain‟s
propellant surface to prevent burning on that surface. By preve nting burning on inhibited
surfaces the initial burning area can be controlled and reduced. Also called restrictor.
Liner: A sticky non-self burning thin layer of polymeric-type material that is applied to the
cases prior to casting the propellant n order to promote good bonding between the propellant
and the case or the insulator. It also allows some axial motion between the grain periphery and
t5he case.
Inte rnal Ins ulator: An internal layer between the case and the propellant grain made of an
adhesive, thermally insulating material that will not burn readily. Its purpose is to limit the heat
transfer to the temperature rise of the case during rocket operation.
Web Thickness, b : The minimum thickness of the grain from the initial burning surface to the
insulated case wall or to the intersection of another burning surface: for an end-burning grain. b
equals the length of the grain.
Web Fraction, bf: For a case-bonded internal burning grain, the ratio of the web thickness b to
the outer radius of the grain:
bf = b/radius=2b/diameter
Volumetric Loading Fraction, Vf: The ratio of propellant volume Vb to the chamber volume
Vc (excluding nozzle) available for propellant, insulation and restrictors Vb = m/p
Vf = Vb/ Vc = It
Where It is the total impulse, Is the specific impulse, and nb the propellant density.
2. The grain geometry is selected to fit these requirements; it should be compact and use the
available volume efficiently, have an appropriate burn surface versus time profile to match the
desired thrust-time curve, and avoid or predictably control possible erosive burning. The
remaining unburned propellant slivers, and often also the shift of the center of gravity during
burning, should be minimized.
3. The propellant is usually selected on the basis of its performance capability (e.g.,
characteristic velocity), mechanical properties (e.g., strength), ballistic properties (e.g., burning
rate), manufacturing characteristics, exhaust plume characteristics, and aging properties. If
necessary, the propellant formulation may be slightly altered or "tailored" to fit exactly the
required burning time or grain geometry.
4. The structural integrity of the grain, including its liner and/or insulator, must be analyzed to
assure that the grain will not fail in stress or strain under all conditions of loading, acceleration,
or thermal stress. The grain geometry can be changed to reduce excessive stresses.
5. The complex internal cavity volume of perforations, slots, ports, and fins increases with
burning time. These cavities need to be checked for resonance, damping, and combustion
stability.
6. The processing of the grain and the fabrication of the propellant should be simple and low
cost.
Constant area pressure and thrust require a grain with neutral burning characteristic, while
increasing and decreasing value of these parameters require progressive and regressive burning
characteristics, respectively. The only simple type of grain with a single burning surface
yielding a neutral characteristic is that with end burning or “Cigarette burning. This does not
yield a high thrust, as cross sectional area is limited and hence it is used only for small
rockets. A simple hollow cylinder to give longitudinal burning results in progressive burning,
as the area continually increases, but the addition of a central cylindrical grain or provision of a
key slot throughout the length can be made to give a neutral characteristic. A stat or multi fin
type of grain can also give neutral burning and this general type of configuration is popular, as
the grain has structural strength and requires no additional supports except in the very largest
sizes. Small variations of the fin shape can yield progressive or regressive burning to a
program such as two-step burning. Some grain geometries are show in the fig. Portions of grain
surfaces which are not required to burn but which may ignite adventitiously can be inhibited by
casting the surface with an insert or very slow burning substances. The outside of the grain at
the grain at the wall must have an inhibitor and a layer of non-combustible insulating material
to protect the casing.
The third factor in solid propellant burning is erosive burning, that is accelerated
combustion due to the flow or burning gases along the surfaces of the propellant. At ignition,
the cross sectional area for the flow of the gas within the grain is a minimum. It is larger than
the nozzle area of course and increase with time as the propellant burns. There is thus a
significant gas velocity during the early part of the combustion period , with the gases
sweeping over the burning surface. The effect is one of a boundary layer, with high velocities
producing a thinner layer, with increased heat to transfer to the propellant. It is largely this heat
transfer and consequent preheating of the propellant, which increase the burning rate and leads
to erosive burning. Thus a fast burning performance will be less subject to erosive burning t han
a slower one and hence the phenomenon is associated with propellant composition, at least up
to high pressure (=100psi).
requires more insulation layer thickness (and more inert mass) to prevent local thermal failure.
In designing motors, erosive burning is either avoided or controlled to be reproducible from
one motor to the next.
ACOUSTIC INSTABILITIES:
When a solid propellant rocket motor experiences unstable combustion, the pressure in the
interior gaseous cavities (made up by the volume of the port or perforations, fins, slots, conical
or radial groves) oscillates by at least 5% and often by more than 30% of the chamber pressure.
When instability occurs, the heat transfer to the burning surfaces, the nozzle, and the insulated
case walls is greatly increased; the burning rate, chamber pressure, a nd thrust usually increase;
but the burning duration is thereby decreased. The change in the thrust-time profile causes
significant changes in the flight path, and at times this can lead to failure of the mission. If
prolonged and if the vibration energy level is high, the instability can cause damage to the
hardware, such as overheating the case and causing a nozzle or case failure. Instability is a
condition that should be avoided and must be carefully investigated and remedied if it occurs
during a motor development program. Final designs of motors must be free of such instability.
The pressure oscillations increase in magnitude, and the thrust and burning rate also increase.
The frequency seems to be a function of the cavity geometry, propellant composition, pressure,
and internal flame field.
Chuffing is the periodic low frequency discharge of a bushy, unsteady flame of short
duration (typically less than 1 sec) followed by periods of no visible flame, during which slow
out gassing and vaporization of the solid propellant accumulates hot gas in the chamber. The
motor experiences spurts of combustion and consequent pressure buildup followed by periods
of nearly ambient pressure.
VORTEX-SHEDDING INSTABILITY:
This instability is associated with burning on the inner surfaces of slots in the grain.
Large segmented rocket motors have slots between segments, and some grain configurations
have slots that intersect the centerline of the grain. Hot gases from the burning slot surfaces
enter the main flow in the perforation or central cavity of the grain. The hot gas from the slot is
turned into a direction toward the nozzle. The flow from the side stream restricts the flow
emanating from the upstream side of the perforation and, in effect, reduces the port area. This
restriction causes the upstream port pressure to rise; sometimes there is a substantial pressure
rise.
The interaction of the two subsonic gas flows causes turbulence. Vortices form and are
periodically shed or allowed to flow downstream, thereby causing an unstable flow pattern.
The vortex shedding patterns can interact with the acoustic instabilities. The vortex shedding
patterns can interact with the acoustic instabilities.
3.7 STRAND BURNER AND T-BURNER:
A strand burne r is a small pressure vessel (usually with windows) in which a thin strand
or bar of propellant is ignited at one end and burned to the other end. The strand can be
inhibited with an external coating so that it will burn only on the exposed cross-sectional
surface; chamber pressure is simulated by pressurizing the container with inert gas. The
burning rate can be measured by electric signals from embedded wires, by ultrasonic waves, or
by optical methods.
The burning rate measured on strand burners is usually lower than that obtained from
motor firing (by 4 to 12%) because it does not truly simulate the hot chamber environment.
Also small ballistic evaluation motors usually have a slightly lower burning rate than full- scale
larger motors, because of scaling factors. The relationship between the three measured burning
rates is determined empirically for each propellant category and grain configuration. Strand-
burner data are useful in screening propellant formulations and in quality control operations.
Data from full-scale motors tested under a variety of conditions constitute the final proof of
burning-rate behavior. Obviously, the strand burner and other substitutes for the full- scale
motor.
A standard T-burner has a 1.5- in. internal diameter double-ended cylindrical burner vented
at its midpoint. Venting can be through a sonic nozzle to the atmosphere or by a pipe
connected to a surge tank which maintains a constant level of pressure in the b urner cavity. T-
burner design and usage usually concentrate on the portion of the frequency spectrum dealing
with the transverse oscillations expected in a full-scale motor. The desired acoustical
frequency, to be imposed on the propellant charge as it burns, determines the burner length
(distance between closed ends). The nozzle location, midway between the ends of the burner,
minimizes attentuation of fundamental longitudinal mode oscillations (in the propellant grain
cavity).
Acoustic velocity nodes are out of phase with pressure waves and occur at the ends of the
burner. Propellant charges are often in the shape of discs or cups cemented to the end faces of
the burner. The gas velocity in the burner cavity is kept intentionally low (Mach 0.2 or less)
compared with the velocity in a full- scale motor. This practice minimizes the influence of
velocity-coupled energy waves and allows the influence of pressure-coupled waves to be more
clearly recognized.
T-burner are used for assessing the stability of a full-scale solid rocket presupposes valid
theoretical models of the phenomena occurring in both the T-burner and the actual rocket
motor. In addition to assessing solid rocket motor combustion stability, the T burner also is
used to evaluate new propellant formulations and the importance of seemingly small changes
in ingredients, such as a change in aluminum powder particle size and oxidizer grind method.
13. Ablation and gasification of insulator, nozzle, and liner materials contribute to mass flow
and thus to total impulse.
14. Some tactical missile motors have been produced in large quantities (over 200,000 per
year).
15.Can be designed for recovery, refurbishing, and reuse (Space Shuttle solid rocket motor).
UNIT IV
LIQUID AND HYBRID ROCKET PROPULSION
Salient features of liquid propellant rockets – selection of liquid propellants – various feed
systems and injectors for liquid propellant rockets -thrust control and cooling in liquid
propellant rockets and the associated heat transfer problems – combustion instability in liquid
propellant rockets – peculiar problems associated with operation of cryogenic engines -
Introduction to hybrid rocket propulsion – standard and reverse hybrid systems- combustion
mechanism in hybrid propellant rockets –applications and limitations.
A bipropellant rocket unit has two separate liquid propellants, an oxidizer and a fuel. They
are stored separately and are not mixed outside the combustion chamber. The majority of liquid
propellant rockets have been manufactured for bipropellant applications.
A monopropellant contains a oxidizing agent and combustible matter in single substance. It
may be mixture of several compounds or it may be homogeneous material, such hydrogen
peroxide or hydrazine. Monopropellants are stable at ordinary atmosp heric conditions but
decomposed and yield hot combustion gases when heated or catalyzed.
A cold gas propellant (e.g. Nitrogen) is stored at very high pressure, gives a low
performance, allows a simple system and is usually very reliable. It has been used for roll
control and attitude control.
A cryogenic propellant is liquefied gas at low temperature, such as liquid oxygen (-183‟C) or
liquid hydrogen (-253‟c). Provision for venting the storage tank and minimizing vaporization
losses.
Storable propellants (e.g. nitric acid or gasoline) are liquid at ambient temperature and can be
store for long periods in sealed tanks. Space storable propellants are liquid in the environment
of space; this storability depends on the specific tank design, thermal cond itions, and tank
pressure. An example is ammonia.
A gelled propellant is a thyrotrophic liquid with a gelling additive. It is like a jelly or thick
paint. It will not spill or leak. Readily, can flow under pressure, will burn and is safer in some
respects.
The propellant mixture ratio for a bipropellant is the ratio at which the oxidizer and duel are
mixed and react to give hot gases. The mixture ratio r is defined as
mixture ratio r = mo /mr
It is usually chosen to give maximum value of specific impulse or To / M where To is the
combustion temperature, M is the molecular mass of the reaction gases. For a given thrust T
and a given effective exhaust velocity Vj The total propellant flow is given by,
m= =
1. Usually highest specific impulse; for a fixed propellant mass, this increases the
vehicle velocity increment and the attainable mission velocity.
2. Can be randomly throttled and randomly stopped and restarted; can be efficiently
pulsed (some small thrust sizes over 250,000 time). Thrust-time profile can be
randomly controlled, this allows a reproducible flight trajectory.
3. Cutoff impulse can be controllable with thrust termination device (better control of
vehicle terminal velocity).
4. Can be largely checked out just prior to operation. Can be tested at full thrust on
ground or launch pad prior to flight.
5. Can be designed for reuse after field services and checkout.
6. Thrust chamber (or some part of the vehicle) can be cooled and made light weight.
7. Storable liquid propellants have been kept in vehicle for more than 20 years and
engine can be ready to operate quickly.
8. With pumped propulsion feed systems and large total I pulse, the inert propulsion
system mass (including tanks) can be very low (thin tank walls and low tank
pressure), allowing a high propellant mass fraction.
9. Most propellants have nontoxic exhaust, which is environmentally acceptable.
10. Some propellants have nontoxic exhaust, which is environmentally acceptable.
11. Can modify operating conditions during firing to prevent some failures that would
otherwise result in the loss of the mission or vehicle.
12. Can provide component redundancy to enhance reliability.
13. With pumped propulsion feed systems and large total impulse the inert propulsion
system mass can be very low allowing a high propellant mass fraction.
14. Can provide component redundancy to enhance reliability (e.x. dual check valves or
extra thrust chamber).
15. With multiple engines, can design for operation with one or more shutoff (engine
out capability).
16. The geometry of low-pressure tanks can be designed to fit most vehicles space
constraints.
17. The placement propellant tanks within the vehicle can minimize the travel of the
center of gravity during powered flight. This enhances the vehicles flight stability and
reduces control forces.
18. Plume radiation and smoke are usually low.
LIQUID PROPELLANT ROCKET DISADVANTAGES:
11. Sloshing in tank can cause a flight stability problem, but it can be minimized with
baffles. If tank outlet is uncovered aspirated gas can cause combustion interruption or
combustion vibration.
12. Smoky exhaust plume can occur with some hydrocarbon fuels.
13. Needs special design provisions for start in zero gravity.
14. With cryogenic liquid propellants there is a start delay caused by the time needed to
cool the system flow passage cryogenic temperatures.
15. Life of cooled large thrust chambers may be limited to perhaps 100 or more starts.
16. High-thrust unit requires several seconds to start.
Pressure for injection can also be generated within the propellant tank or tanks by introducing a
small quantity of a gas, which reacts exothermally with the propellant; this produces the high
pressure gas required to force the propellant into the combustor.
The turbine and pumps for rocket applications are designed to meet some special
requirements. There are enormous temperature differences within a turbo-pump unit. The high-
pressure gas at the turbine inlet is at a high temperature of the order of 1500K whereas the
temperature of some of the propellants are highly reactive. Therefore, the sealing arrangement in
propellant pumps should be perfect and resistant to corrosion. Both positive displacement and
turbo pumps can be used for delivering propellants from the tanks to the combustion chamber.
However, centrifugal pumps are widely used. For a given peripheral speed of the pump impeller
it is preferable to employ higher rotational speed in order to restrict the size of the pump.
The injection hole pattern on the face of the injector is closely related to the internal
manifolds or feed passages with the injectors. Those provides for the distribution of propellant
from the injector inlet to all the injection holes, a large complex manifold volume allows low
passage velocities and good distribution of flow over the cross section of the chamber. A small
manifold volume allows for a lighter weight injector and reduces the amount of “dribble”. flow
after the main walls are shut.
The higher passage velocity causes an uneven flow through the different identical injection
holes and thus a poorer distribution and wider local gas composition variation. Dribbling results
in after burning, which is an insufficient irregular combustion that give a little cut o ff thrust after
wall closing. For application with very accurate terminal vehicle velocity requirements, a cut off
impulse has to be very small and reproducible and often walls are build into the injector to
minimize passage wall.
The impinging steam type, multi hole injectors are commonly used with oxygen hydrocarbon
and storable propellants. For unlike doublet patterns the propellants are injected through a
number of separate small holes in impingement forms thin liquid fans and aids atomization of the
liquids into droplets, also distributions. Characteristics of specific injection orifice are given in
the table. Impinging hole injector are also used for like on like or cells impinging patterns (fuel
on fuel and oxidizer on oxidizer)
The two liquid steams then form a fan, which breaks up into droplets. Unlike doublets work
best when the hole size of the fuel is about equal to that of the oxidizer and the ignition delay is
long enough to allow the formation of fans. For uneven volume flow the triplet pattern seems to
be more effective.
The non-impinging or showerhead injector employs non- impinging steams of propellant
usually emerge in normal to the face of the injector. It release on turbulence and diffusion to
achieve mixing. This type is not used, because it requires a large chamber volume for good
combustion. Sheet or sprays type injectors give cylindrical, conical, or other types of spray
sheets, these sprays generally intersect and thereby promote mixing and atomization. By varying
the width of the sheet (through an axially moveable sleeve) it is possible to throttle the propellant
flow over a wide range without excessive reduction in injector pressure drop. his type of variable
area concentric tube injector was used on the descent engine of the lunar excursion module and
throttled over a range of flow with only a very small in mixture ratio.
The coaxial hollow post injector has been used for liquid oxygen and gaseous hydrogen
injectors by most domestic and foreign rocket designers. It is shown in the lower left of Fig. It
works well when the liquid hydrogen has absorbed heat from cooling jackets and has been
gasified. This gasified hydrogen flows at high speed (typically 330 m/sec or 1000 ft/sec); the
liquid oxygen flows far more slowly (usually at less than 33 m sec or 100 ft/sec) and the
differential velocity caused a shear action, which helps to break up the oxygen stream into small
droplets. The injector has a multiplicity of these coaxial posts on it face. This type of injector is
not used with liquid storable bipropellants, in part because the pressure drop to achieve high
velocity would become too high.
4.4 THRUST CONTROL AND COOLING IN LIQUID PROPELLANT ROCKETS AND THE
ASSOCIATED HEAT TRANSFER PROBLEMS:
THRUST VECTOR CONTROL:
All chemical propulsion systems can be provided with one of several types of thrust vector
control (TVC) mechanisms. Some of these apply either to solid, hybrid, or to liquid propellant
rocket propulsion systems.
Aerodynamic fins (fixed and movable) continue to be very effective for controlling vehicle
flight within the earth's atmosphere, and almost all weather rockets, antiaircraft missiles, and air-
to-surface missiles use them. Even though aerodynamic control surfaces provide some additional
drag, their effectiveness in terms of vehicle weight, turning moment, and actuating power
consumption is difficult to surpass with any other flight control method.
The reasons for TVC are: (1) to willfully change a flight path or trajectory (e.g., changing t he
direction of the flight path of a target-seeking missile); (2) to rotate the vehicle or change its
attitude during powered flight; (3) to correct for deviation from the intended trajectory or the
attitude during powered flight; or (4) to correct for thrust misalignment of a fixed nozzle in the
main propulsion system during its operation, when the main thrust vector misses the vehicle's
center of gravity.
TVC MECHANISMS WITH A SINGLE NOZZLE:
They can be classified into four categories:
1. Mechanical deflection of the nozzle or thrust chamber.
2. Insertion of heat-resistant movable bodies into the exhaust jet; these experience aerodynamic
forces and cause a deflection of a part of the exhaust gas flow.
3. Injection of fluid into the side of the diverging no zzle section, causing an asymmetrical
distortion of the supersonic exhaust flow.
4. Separate thrust-producing devices that are not part of the main flow through the nozzle.
In the hinge or gimbal sche me (a hinge permits rotation about one axis only, whereas a gimbal
is essentially a universal joint), the whole engine is pivoted on a bearing and thus the thrust
vector is rotated. For small angles this scheme has negligible losses in specific impulse a nd is
used in many vehicles. It requires a flexible set of propellant piping (bellows) to allow the
propellant to flow from the tanks of the vehicle to the movable engine.
Jet vanes are pairs of heat-resistant, aerodynamic wing-shaped surfaces submerged in the
exhaust jet of a fixed rocket nozzle. They were first used about 55 years ago. They cause extra
drag (2 to 5% less Is; drag increases with larger vane deflections) and erosion of the vane
material. Graphite jet vanes were used in the German V-2 missile in World War II and in the
Scud missiles fired by Iraq in 1991. The advantage of having roll control with a single nozzle
often outweighs the performance penalties.
Small auxiliary thrust chambers were used in the Thor and early version of Atlas missiles.
They provide roll control while the principal rocket engine operates. They are fed from the same
feed system as the main rocket engine. This scheme is still used on some Russian booster rocket
vehicles.
Injection of Secondary Fluid (SITVC) through the wall of the nozzle into the main gas stream
has the effect of forming oblique shocks in the nozzle diverging section, thus causing an
unsymmetrical distribution of the main gas flow, which produces a side force. The secondary
fluid can be stored liquid or gas from a separate hot gas generator (the gas would then still be
sufficiently cool to be piped), a direct bleed from the chamber, or the injection of a catalyzed
monopropellant. When the deflections are small, this is a low- loss scheme, but for large
moments (large side forces) the amount of secondary fluid becomes excessive.
Movable nozzles are the most efficient. They do not significantly reduce the thrust or the
specific impulse and are weight-competitive with the other mechanical types.
Flexible Seal Nozzle has been used in launch vehicles and large strategic missiles, where the
environmental temperature extremes are modest. At low temperature the elastomer becomes stiff
and the actuation torques increase substantially, requiring a much larger actuation system. It
uses a movable joint with a toroidal hydraulic bag to transfer loads. There are double seals to
prevent leaks of hot gas and various insulators to keep the structure below 200°F or 93°C.
Jet Tab TVC system has low torque, and is simple for flight vehicles with low-area-ratio
nozzles. Its thrust loss is high when tabs are rotated at full angle into the jet, but is zero when the
tabs are in their neutral position outside of the jet. On most flights the time-averaged position of
the tab is a very small angle and the average thrust loss is small. Jet tabs can form a very
compact mechanism and have been used successfully on tactical missiles.
Jetavator was used on submarine-launched missiles. The thrust loss is roughly proportional to
the vector angle.
can leave the rocket engine. If port A is opened, an extra boost flow can leave the combustion
chamber and the boost throat acts as nozzle throat.
The pintle nozzle employs a center body that can move in an axial direction; thereby
continuously vary in the throat area, Fig. The central body, which holds the movable pintle is
mounted on struts on the nozzle inlet. It is of course, possible to co mbine TVC and TMC to
obtain real thrust vector control, i.e both magnitude and direction of the thrust can be varied.
Another TMC device that should be mentioned in this section is the extendable exit cone. If
curing powered flight under-expansion losses become unacceptably large, one can increase the
thrust by lengthening the exit cone. This may be done by moving aft an extension to the
divergent part of the nozzle. This concept was planned for the Space Shuttle main Engine,
SSME, but has been abandoned to keep the mechanism simple.
Film cooling and special insulation are supplementary techniques that are used occasionally
with both methods to locally augment their cooling capability. This is an auxiliary method
applied to chambers and or nozzles, augmenting either, a marginal steady- state or a transient
cooling method. It can be applied to a complete thrust chamber or just to the no zzle, where heat
transfer is the highest. Film cooling is method of cooling where by a relatively cool thin fluid
film covers and protects exposed will surfaces from excessive heat transfer. The film is
introduced by infecting small quantities of fuel or an inlet fluid at very low velocity through a
large number or orifices along the exposed surfaces in such a manner that a protective relatively
cool gas film is formed. A coolant with a high heat of vaporization and a high boiling point is
particularly desirable.
A special type of film cooling, sweat cooling or transpirations cooling uses a porous wall
material which admits a coolant through pores uniformly over the surface.
Cooling also helps to reduce the oxidation of the wall material and the rate at which walls would
be eaten away. The rates of chemical oxidizing reactions between the hot gas and the wall
material can increase dramatically with wall temperature. This oxidation problem can be
minimized not only by limiting the wall temperature, but also by burning the liquid propellants at
a mixture ratio where the percentage of aggressive gases in the hot gas (such as oxygen or
hydroxyl) is very small, and by coating certain wall materials with an oxidation- resistant
coating; for example iridium has been coated on the inside of rhenium walls.
where Q is the heat transferred per unit across a surface A, dT/dL the temperature gradient with
respect to thickness L at the surface A, and x the thermal conductivity expressed as the amount
of heat transferred per unit time through a unit area of surface for 1 ° temperature difference over
a unit wall thickness. The negative sign indicates that temperature decreases as thickness
increases.
The steady-state heat transfer through the chamber wall of a liquid-cooled rocket chamber can
be treated as a series type, steady-state heat transfer problem with a large temperature gradient
across the gaseous film on the inside of the chamber wall, a temperature drop across the wall,
and, in cases of cooled chambers, a third temperature drop across the film of the moving cooling
fluid. It is a combination of convection at the boundaries of the flowing fluids and conduction
through the chamber walls. The problem is basically one of heat and mass transport associated
with conduction through a wall.
The important quantities for controlling the heat transfer across a rocket chamber wall are the
fluid film boundaries established by the combustion products on one side of the wall and the
coolant flow on the other. The gas film coefficient largely determines the numerical value of the
heat transfer rate, and the liquid film largely determines the value of the wall temperatures. The
temperature drop across the inner wall and the maximum temperature are reduced if the wall is
thin and is made of material of high thermal conductivity. The wall thickness is determined from
strength considerations and thermal stresses, and some designs have as little as 0.025 in.
thickness.
Surface roughness can have a large effect on the film coefficients and thus on the heat flux.
Measurements have shown that the heat flow can be increased by a factor of up to 2 by surface
roughness and to higher factors when designing turbulence-creating obstructions in the cooling
channels. Major surface roughness on the gas side will cause the gas locally to come close to
stagnation temperature. However, surface roughness on the liquid coolant side of the wall will
enhance turbulence and the absorption of heat by the coolant and reduce wall temperatures.
Chugging, the first type of combustion instability stems mostly from the elastic nature of the
feed systems and structures of vehicles or the imposition of propulsion forces upon the vehicle.
Chugging of an engine or thrust chamber assembly can occur in a test facility, especially with
low chamber pressure engines (100 to 500 psi), because of propellant pump cavitation, gas
entrapment in propellant flow, tank pressurization control fluctuations, and vibration of engine
supports and propellant lines. It can be caused by resonances in the engine feed system (such as
an oscillating bellows inducing a periodic flow fluctuation) or a coupling of structural and feed
system frequencies.
When both the vehicle structure and the propellant liquid in the feed system have about the
same natural frequency, then force coupling can occur, not only to maintain, but also to strongly
amplify oscillations. Propellant flow rate disturbances, usually at 10 to 50 Hz, give rise to low
frequency longitudinal combustion instability, producing a longitudinal motion of vibration in
the vehicle. This vehicle flight instability phenomenon has been called pogo instability since it is
similar to pogo jumping stick motion. Pogo instabilities can occur in the propellant feed lines of
large vehicles such as space launch vehicles or ballistic missiles.
Buzzing, the intermediate type of instability, seldom represents pressure perturbations greater
than 5% of the mean in the combustion chamber and usua lly is not accompanied by large
vibratory energy. It often is more noisy and annoying than damaging, although the occurrence of
buzzing may initiate high- frequency instability. Often it is characteristic of coupling between the
combustion process and flow in a portion of the propellant feed s ystem. Initiation is thought to
be from the combustion process. Acoustic resonance of the combustio n chamber with a critical
portion of the propellant flow system, sometimes originating in a pump, promotes continuation
of the phenomenon. This type of instability is more prevalent in medium-size engines (2000 to
250,000 N thrust or about 500 to 60,000 lbf) than in large engines.
Screeching or Screaming, has high frequency and is most perplexing and most common in the
development of new engines. Both liquid and solid propellant rockets co mmonly experience
high- frequency instability during their development phase. Since energy content increases with
frequency, this type is the most destructive, capable of destroying an engine in much less
than 1 sec. Once encountered, it is the type for which it is most difficult to prove that the
incorporated "fixes" or improvements render the engine "stable" under all launch and flight
conditions. It can be treated as a phenomenon isolated to the combustion chamber and not
generally influenced by feed system or structure.
One possible source of triggering high- frequency instability is a rocket combustion
phenomenon called popping. Popping is an undesirable random highamplitude pressure
disturbance that occurs during steady-state operation of a rocket engine with hypergolic
propellants. It is a possible source for initiation of high- frequency instability. "Pops" exhibit
some of the characteristics of a detonation wave. The rise time of the pressure is a few
microseconds and the pressure ratio across the wave can be as high as 7:1. The elimination of
popping is usually achieved by redesign of the injector rather than by the application of baffles or
absorbers.
For long-term storage of cryogenic propellants in space vacuum (or on the gro und) some form
of a powered refrigeration system is needed to recondense the vapors and minimize evaporation
losses. The tanks are refilled or topped off just before launch to replace the evaporated vented
propellant. When the tank is pressurized, just before launch, the boiling point is usually raised
slightly and the cryogenic liquid can usually absorb the heat transferred to it during the several
minutes of rocket firing. With cryogenic propellants the pipes, pumps, cooling jackets, injectors,
and valves have to be cooled to the cryogenic fluid temperature prior to start, by bleeding cold
propellant through them; this cooling propellant is not used to produce thrust. Its periodic flow
has to be controlled.
A hybrid, as the name suggests, is an engine that shares components from both solid-
propellant rocket and liquid-propellant rocket design. It has a tank supplying liquid or gaseous
propellant into a combustion chamber that contains a solid propellant. The conventional
„forward‟ hybrid stores liquid oxidizer in the tank, and solid fuel within the chamber. With a
„reverse‟ hybrid, the fuel is the liquid in the tank, and solid oxidizer is in the chamber.
A hybrid fuel grain is ignited by providing a source of heat, which initiates gasification of the
solid fuel grain at the head end of the motor. Subsequent initiation of oxidizer flow provides the
required flame spreading to fully ignite the motor. Ignition is typically accomplished by injection
of a hypergolic fluid into the motor combustion chamber. A mixture of triethyl aluminum (TEA)
and triethyl borane (TEB) is injected into the vaporization chamber. The TEA/TEB mixture
ignites spontaneously on contact with air in the combustion chamber, vaporizing fuel in the
dome region. Subsequent injection of liquid oxygen completes ignition of the motor. TEA.
High performance stems from high combustion efficiency that is a direct function of the
thoroughness with which unburned oxidizer exhausting from the combustion port is mixed with
unburned fuel from within sublayers of the boundary layer. Multiple combustion ports serve to
promote high combustion efficiency as a result of the turbulent mixing environment for
unreacted fuel and oxidizer in the mixing chamber region downstream of the fuel grain. As the
fuel grain of a hybrid typically contains no oxidizer, the combustion process and hence the
regression of the fuel surface is markedly different from tha t of a solid rocket motor. Because the
solid fuel must be vaporized before combustion can occur, the fuel surface regression is
intrinsically related to the coupling of combustion port aerodynamics and heat transfer to the fuel
grain surface. The primary combustion region over the fuel grain surface has been shown to be
limited to a relatively narrow flame zone occurring within the fuel grain boundary layer.
Factors affecting the development of the fuel grain boundary layer and, hence, fuel regression
characteristics include pressure, gas temperature, grain composition, combustion port oxidizer
mass flow rate, and combustion port length.
The Regression rate depends upon the draught (Mass flux rate) of gas passing over the surface
of the solid fuel, which we can increase, akin to using bellows or opening–up the flue on the
chimney, to increase performance. In a simple forward hybrid, o xidizer, such as nitrous oxide,
flows down the single central hole (or Port) running down the center of a thick-walled pipe of
solid propellant fuel, such as plastic.
Once the hybrid has been ignited, some of the hot combusted gas is carried via the turbulence
within the Boundary layer to the surface of the solid propellant where its heat is conducted into
the top layer of this fuel. (a process known as „forced convection‟; radiation plays a minor role.)
The heat then melts a layer of fuel off of the exposed surface of the fuel charge, and what
happens next depends upon the type of fuel used.
'Melt' isn't quite the right phrase with plastic fuel- grains, because the long polymerised
hydrocarbon molecules in plastics are too long and entangled ever to have solidified completely
at low temperature like the nice, ordered atoms of a solid metal: they never really froze.
Instead, they're supercooled liquids with phenomenally high viscosity as with glass, but once
heated above a critical „Glass Transition Temperature‟, they will flow like a liquid, albeit treacle.
As the surface is heated further, the remaining liquid vaporizes to gas.
A „melt layer‟ appears to rest on the surface of the fuel, though infact this liquid layer is
constantly being replenished from underneath, and removed from above. It tends to be
extremely thin, and if its viscosity is low (i.e. NOT a melted polymer) then it breaks up into a
series of ripples and roll waves due to the flow of gas.
With further heating, the remaining fuel in the melt layer, or the cracked hydrocarbons in the
case of polymers, vaporize to gas and get carried off into the main flow. This is the second
transport mechanism that gets the fuel and oxidizer mixed, occurs at high temperature.
Once transported into the port flow, the vaporized fuel burns in a narrow zone within the
boundary layer known as the flame zone or flame sheet, which is at a depth between the fuel
grain below and the oxidizer flow above that is close enough to stochiometric to support
combustion.
4.10 APPLICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS:
ADVANTAGES:
(1) Safety during fabrication, storage, or operation without any possibility of explosion or
detonation.
(2) Start-stop-restart capabilities.
(3)Relatively low system cost.
(4) Higher specific impulse than solid rocket motors and higher density-specific impulse than
liquid bipropellant engines.
(5) The ability to smoothly change motor thrust over a wide range on demand.
DISADVANTAGES:
(1) Mixture ratio and, hence, specific impulse will vary somewhat during steady-state operation
and throttling.
(2) Lower density-specific impulse than solid propellant systems.
(3) Some fuel sliver must be retained in the combustion chamber at end-of burn, which slightly
reduces motor mass fraction.
(4) Unproven propulsion system feasibility at large scale.
UNIT V
ADVANCED PROPULSION TECHNIQUES
Electric rocket propulsion– types of electric propulsion techniques - Ion propulsion – Nuclear
rocket – comparison of performance of these propulsion systems with chemical rocket propulsion
systems – future applications of electric propulsion systems - Solar sail.
Figure shows an arc jet schematically. propellant is heated to high temperature in an electric
arc and then expanded in a conventional nozzle. It the propellant were to be have as a perfect gas
and if the expansion were isentropic, the exhaust velocity would be give by
Ve = √ * ( )+
Spot motion may be produced by imparting vertex motion to the p ropellant gas before it enters
the arc, or by the presence of a suitable magnetic field which interacts with the arc current and
induces motion of the arc transverse to the current and induces motion of the arc transverse to the
current direction.
Most of the transmission energy to the propellant occurs in the arc column. Electrons and
ions, accelerated in the electrostatic field, transfer their energy by collision to neutral gas
particles. Since gas conductivity increase rapidly with temperature, attempts to produce high
exhaust velocity are hampered by the associated decrease of arc column resistance relative to the
rest of the arc circuit. This results in a decreasing fraction of total electrical power liberated in
the arc column.
RESISTOJETS:
These devices are the simplest type of electrical thruster because the technology is based on
conventional conduction, convection,and radiation heat exchange. The propellant is heated by
flowing over an ohmically heated refractory-metal surface, such as
Because of the material limitations around 2700K the maximum specific impulse are
yielding of about 300 sec. The higher specific impulse can be obtained with Hydrogen because
of the lower density, causes propellant storage to be bulky. But cryogenic propellant storage is
unrealistic for space missions. Other propellants are such as O 2 , H2 0, CO2 , NH3 , CH4 and N2
.Also hot gases resulting from catalytic decomposition of hydrazine(which produces
approximately one volume of NH3 and 2 volume of H2 ) has the advantage of being compact and
catalytic c77Xo section preheats the mixed gas to about 700 *C prior to their seeing heated
electrically to an even high temperature; this reduces the required electric power while taking
advantage of a well-proven space chemical propulsion concept.
Resistojets have been proposed for manned long duration deep space missions. Unlike
the ion engine and the hall thruster, the same resistojet design can be used with different
propellants. In common with rarely all electric propulsion systems, Resistojets have a propellants
feed system that has to supply either from high pressure-storage tank or liquid under zero gravity
conditions. Liquids require positive tank expulsion mechanisms and pure hydrazine need heaters
to keep it from freezing.
Electromagnetic Thrusters:
This third major type of electric propulsion devices accelerates propellant gas that has
been heated to a plasma state. Plasmas are mixture of electrons, positive ions, and neutrals that
readily conduct electricity at temperatures usually above 5000k. According to electromagnetic
theory, wherever a conductor carries a current perpendicular to q magnetic field, a body force
exerted on the conductor in a direction at right angles to both the current and the magnetic field.
Unlike the ion engine, this accelerated process yields a neutral exhaust beam. Another advantage
is the relatively high thrust density, or thrust per unit area, which is normally about 10 to 1000
times of the engines.
For all electromagnetic thrusters, the plasma is part of the current-carrying electrical
circuit and most are accelerated without the need for area changes. Motion of propellant,
moderate – density plasma or in some cases a combination of plasma and cold gas particles, is
due to a complex set of interactions. This is particularly true of short duration (3 to 10
microsecond) pulsed plasma thrusters where nothing reaches an equilibrium state, Basically, the
designer of an electromagnetic thruster tries to
low efficiencies (with their associated heat dissipation) have slowed implementation of these
devices.
Half – Effect thruster:
When plasma densities are low enough and or magnetic fields are high enough the hall-
effect electric field becomes quite significant. This is the same phenomenon that is observed in
the semiconductor hall effect where a voltage raises transverse to the applied electric fields. The
hall current can be understood to represent the motion of the election “guiding center” in a
crossed electric field arrangement where collisions must be relative insignificant. The hall
thruster is of interest becomes it represents a practical operating region for space propulsion . this
is also called as stationary plasma thruster or SPT, since a portion of the electron current swirls
in place.
The basics of electrostatic or ion propulsion is simply the acceleration of charged particles by
an electric field. Figure shows schematically a typical ion thrust system. The propellant source
feeds neutral atoms to an ion source and the positive ions generated are accelerated by one or
more sets of electrodes which are maintained at zero potential the ion source being at a high
potential. The negative ions or electrons have to be returned eventually to the positively charged
exhaust stream to maintain a neutral beam. The propellant can in principle be any substance
capable of ionization solid, liquid or gas, and may be in atomic, molecular or particle form. Our
object have is to look at the problems involved to analyze the operation form the point of view
of understanding the performance and major design factors.
While designing the ionization propulsion system, one has to consider the following areas.
1. Production of ions, including choice of propellant
2. Production of a uniform, parallel ion bean accelerated to the necessary level.
3. Neutralization of the positively charged beam.
There are presently three main methods of generating ions:
1. Surface contact
2. Electron bombardment and
3. Electric arc.
In recent years there have been renewed interests in nuclear fission rocket propulsion
primarily for a potential manned planetary exploration mission. Studies have shown that the
high specific impulse (around 1100sec) allows shorter interplanetary trip transfer times, smaller
vehicles, and more flexibility in the launch time when planets are not in their optimum relative
poison.
In the isotope decay engine, a radioactive material gives off has been used successfully
for generating electrical power in space profiles. The released energy can be used to ratio the
temperature of a propulsive working fluid such as hydrogen or perhaps drive an electric
propulsion system. In provides usually a lower thrust and lower temperature than the other types
of nuclear rockets. As yet. Isotope decay rocket engines have not been developed or flown.
Fusion is the third nuclear method of creating nuclear energy that can heat a working
fluid. Update, many concepts have been studies, but not yet tested and also not feasible or
practical. Concerns about an accident with the inadvertent spreading of radioactive materials in
the earth environment and high cost of a development programs have to date prevented a
renewed experimental development of a large nuclear rocket engine.
Disadvantages:
1. Difficult to stimulate analytically
2. High specific power
3. Heavy power supply
Hall Thruster (Electromagnetic):
Advantages:
1. Desirable Isp range,
2. Compact, relatively simple power conditioning
3. Inert propellant (Xe)
Disadvantages:
1. Single propellant
2. High beam divergence
3. Erosion.
Electric propulsion systems have a set of unique applications with low thrusts, low
accelerations, trajectories exclusively in space, high specific impulse, long operating times, and
generally a relatively massive power supply system.
Electric thrusters typically use much less propellant than chemical rockets.
Allow for more sustained flight.
Electric propulsion can provide a small thrust for a long time.
Electric propulsion offers several advantages. First it is safer. Electric-propulsion engines are
also more efficient than chemical ones, in the sense that they require much less propellant to
produce the same overall effect, i.e. a particular increase in spacecraft velocity. The propellant is
ejected up to twenty times faster than from classical thrusters and therefore the same propelling
force is obtained with twenty times less propellant. The only negative point is that chemical
engines can eject massive amounts of propellant, while electric thrusters work with very small
flows, so that they push the spacecraft very gently compared with chemical systems –
comparable with the reactive force generated by an ant walking on a sheet of paper!
Consequently, it takes much longer to achieve a particular speed and hence when high
acceleration is critical electrical propulsion cannot be used, at least in its current forms. On the
other hand, the force it produces can be applied continuously for very long periods – months or
even years. For interplanetary missions, therefore, the target destination can sometimes be
reached more quickly than with chemical propulsion.
Electric thrusters also give the ability to regulate the force applied to the spacecraft very
accurately, making it possible to control the spacecraft‟s position and orientation along its orbit
with incomparable precision. More sophisticated high-precision scientific missions, such as
gravitational wave detectors, space interferometers and advanced space observatories.
NASA has been experimenting with giant solar sails that could be pushed through the cosmos by
light. There are three components to a solar sail-powered spacecraft:
1. Continuous force exerted by sunlight
2. A large, ultrathin mirror
3. A separate launch vehicle
A Solar sail-powered spacecraft wouldn‟t need traditional propellant for power, because its
propellant would be sunlight and the sun would be its engine. Light is composed of
electromagnetic radiation that exerts force on objects it comes on contact with NASA researchers
have found that at I astronomical unit (AU), which is the distance from the sun to Earth, equal to
93 millions miles (150 million km), sunlight can produce about 1.4 kilowatts(kw) of power. If
you take 1.4kw and divide it by the speed of light, you would find that the force exerted by the
sun is about 9 newtons (N)/square mile (i.e., 2 Jb/km2 or 78 Ib/mi2 ). In comparison, a space
shuttle main engine can produce 1.67 million N of force during liftoff 2.1million N of thrust in a
vacuum. Eventually, however, the continuous force of the sunlight on a solar sail could propel a
spacecraft to speeds five times faster than traditional rockets.
To use the force of sunlight, NASA is testing materials that could be used to build a solar sail.
Such a sail would have to be gigantic in size to capture an adequate amount of power to move it.
Early plans have been made to develop a solar that is nearly half a kilometer wide that would be
launched on board a surrogate vehicle and unfurled in space. Once unfurled, the solar sail would
act as a giant mirror reflecting the sunlight. The electromagnetic radiation of light will hit this
reflective solar sail, moving it forward.
While solar sails have been designed before, materials available until rece ntly were much too
heavy to design a practical solar sailing vehicle. This new sail is promising because it would be
made out of lightweight carbon fibers only a few microns thick. In fact, a solar sail used for
space travel would need to be almost as thin as a piece of notebook paper. This carbon fiber
material is stiff and can withstand the intense heat from the sun, while capturing the sun‟s
energy. This means a solar sail could fly closer to the sun to capture even more thrust from
sunlight.
With just sunlight as power, a solar sail would never be launched from the ground. More likely, a
second spacecraft would launch the solar sail, which would then be deployed in space. However,
another possible way to launch a solar sail would be with microwave or laser beams provided by
a satellite or other spacecraft. These energy beams could be directed at the sail to launch it into
space and provide a secondary power source during its journey. In a recent experiment at
NASA‟s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), sails were driven to liftoff using microwave beams,
while laser beams were used to push the sail forward.
APPLICATION OF SOLAR SAIL:
A rocket less spacecraft powered by a solar sail would begin its journey at a slow but steady
pace; gradually picking up speed as the sun continues to exert force upon it. Sooner or later, no
matter how fast it goes, the rocket ship will run out of power. In contrast, the solar sail craft has
an endless supply of power from the sun. Additionally, the so lar sail could potentially return to
Earth, whereas the rocket powered vehicle would not have any propellant to bring it back.
As it continues to be pushed by sunlight, the solar sail – propelled vehicle will build up
speeds that rocket powered vehicles would never be able to achieve. Such a vehicle would
eventually travel at about 56 mi/sec (90 km/sec), which would be more than 200,000 mph
(324,000 kph). That speed is about 10 times faster than the space shuttle‟s orbital speed of 5
mi/sec (8 km/sec). to give you an idea how fast that is, you could travel from New York to Los
Angeles in less than a minute with a solar sail vehicle traveling at top speed.
If NASA were to launch an interstellar probe powered by solar sails, it would take only eight
years for it to catch the Voyager I spacecraft (the most distant spacecraft from Earth), which has
been traveling foe more than 20years. By adding a laser or magnetic beam transmitter, NASA
said it could push speeds to 18,600 mi/sec (30,000 km/sec), which is one-tenth the speed of light.
At those speeds, interstellar travel would be an almost certainty.