Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FraMCoS-X
G. Pijaudier-Cabot, P. Grassl and C. La Borderie (Eds)
https://doi.org/10.21012/FC10.235513
1
A D Jefferson, B L Freeman, R E Davies & T Selvarajoo
2
A D Jefferson, B L Freeman, R E Davies & T Selvarajoo
3 NUMERICAL MODEL
3
A D Jefferson, B L Freeman, R E Davies & T Selvarajoo
The crack opening at any position is curing and cured material (a) at a particular
assumed to be equal to the normal component point is given by;
⌣
of u , which is denoted by the scalar uf..
a = a + ∆ac − ∆aredam + ∆arec (6)
The cohesive zone model has been applied
to a 4-noded element with embedded strong in which ∆ac is the incremental area of
discontinuity within a research finite element virgin filled crack, ∆aredam is the incremental
program developed at Cardiff University. area of re-damaged material and ∆arec is the
incremental area of re-filled cracks;
3.2 Healing agent curing
The total relative proportion of healed
The curing of cyanoacrylate can be material is then computed from equation (7).
simulated using the following curing function
(φ); h = h ⋅ e −∆t τ h + a ⋅ (1 − e −∆t τ h ) (7)
− t − t0
τh This expression takes advantage of the
φ ( t,t0 ) = 1 − e (4) semigroup property of the exponential
in which t and t0 represent the current and function (equation 4) [4].
initial time respectively, and τh is a healing A much fuller description of the model,
time parameters. <> is a McCauley bracket, including full details of the damage-healing
defined as <x>=0 if x≤ 0 and =x if x>0. model, a description of the element with strong
A comparison between equation (4) discontinuity, the diffuse surface curing
and some experimental data measured by the model, the method used to track the
Cambridge Polymer group (2004) for the increments of material arriving and curing, the
curing of a droplet of cyanoacrylate on glass is matrix flow component and the computational
shown in Figure 7. details of the coupled non-linear solution
procedure will be provided in a forthcoming
journal paper on the model.
1.2
1 5. EXAMPLE
Degree of cure
0.8
The coupled model has been used to
0.6 consider the set of experiments described in
0.4 Section 2(i) of this paper. A particular example
0.2 Experimental is presented here for illustration. Many more
Curing Function examples are presented in the forthcoming
0
0 100 200 300 journal paper.
Curing time (secs) The test setup is illustrated in Figure 8. The
beam was loaded such that the crack mouth
Figure 7. Comparison between curing function (4) and opening displacement (CMOD) increased at a
experimental data from reference Cambridge Polymer rate of 0.001mm/s. The healing agent was
Group (2004) supplied throughout the duration of the test. In
addition, a control test was undertaken in
The volume of cured material (vcured) is which no healing agent was supplied.
obtained from the following convolution
integral;
t dv
vcured = ∫ φ( s,t0 ) ds (5)
t0 ds
During a time increment, new healing
material may arrive, healed material may
damage and damaged material may re-heal. To
account for these factors the relative area of
Figure 8. Experimental arrangement
4
A D Jefferson, B L Freeman, R E Davies & T Selvarajoo
5. CONCLUDING REMARKS
The component of the deformed mesh
The data gathered in the experimental
around the central crack is shown in Figure 9.
programme characterised the transport and
This shows the extent of healing at a time of
curing properties of a healing agent in cracked
97 seconds from the start of the test.
cementitious structural elements. The tests also
A comparison between the model
provided detailed information on damage-
predictions and experimental data is provided
healing behaviour and shows how these
in Figure 10, in which Th and Th3 denote
processes interact when they occur
experimental results from healing tests. It may
simultaneously.
be seen that the coupled model provides a
The coupled finite element model is able to
reasonable representation of the experimental
represent the flow behaviour of a healing agent
behaviour.
in a discrete crack and in a micro-cracked
continuum. The model is also able to
reproduce complex damage-healing behaviour
with good accuracy.
REFERENCES
[1] De Belie N at al. Review of Self-healing
Concrete for Damage Management of
Structures. Advanced Materials Interfaces.
DOI: 10.1002/201800074
Figure 9. Finite element mesh in deformed
configuration with degree of healing [2] Jefferson A, Javierre E, Freeman B, Zaoui
A, Koenders EAB, and Ferrara L. (2018).
Research Progress on Numerical Models
7 for Self-Healing Cementitious Materials.
Control
6
Th
Advanced materials interfaces, DOI:
5 Th3 10.1002/admi.201701378
Load (kN)
4 Num
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial
support from the UK Engineering and Physical
Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) research
grant EP/P02081X/1, Resilient Materials for Life
(http://RM4L.com/).