You are on page 1of 5

Advances in Clinical Neurophysiology (Supplements to Clinical Neurophysiology Vol.

)4)
Editors: R.C. Reisin, M.R. Nuwer, M. Hallett. C. Medina
(i'j 2002 Elsevier Science B,y' All rights reserved.

248

Chapter 37

Neural correlates of cerebral plasticity after brain infarction

Rudiger 1. Seitz", Cathrin M. Butefisch" and Volker Homberg"


'Department ofNeurology, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf (Germany)
b Neurological Therapy Center, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, D-40591 Dusseldorf (Germany)

Introduction plasticity can be maladaptive and may give rise to


neurological disorders such as dystonia, epilepsy
Brain diseases such as ischemic brain infarction and pain, it is usually beneficial occurring in rela-
impair brain function by direct interference with tion to memory and learning and to deficit com-
key node areas in functional brain networks but pensation in neurological diseases such as stroke.
allow for deficit compensation by brain plasticity. In acute stroke a number of processes that become
Plasticity is the process ofuse-dependent enhance- sequentially operative determine post-ischemic re-
ment of synaptic efficacy and shaping of connec- covery. The events include rapid reperfusion due
tivity underlying the physiological development, to acute therapeutic interventions, spontaneous re-
learning, and post-lesional recovery. Great progress gression of per i1esionaI and remote dysfunction in
in understanding the mechanisms of functional the subacute phase after infarction, and reorgani-
recovery has been achieved by animal research. In zation of large-scale networks in both cerebral
animal experiments, lesions ofthe brain, spinal cord hemispheres extending into the chronic stage of
or peripheral nerves have been shown to affect brain the disease (Herholz and Heiss 2000).
function and induce adaptive changes in the cerebral
cortex (Kaas and Florence 1997). Functional neu-
roimaging methods, such as positron emission tom- Systems level
ography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance
imaging (fMRl), provide the means to study these It appears from Fig. I that most patients recover
mechanisms of reorganization in the living human well and early. Three different patient groups with
brain (Chollet and Weiller 2000). These methods respect to different degrees of post-ischemic im-
revealed that not only the infantile brain but also pairment and recovery can be differentiated (Bin-
the brains of adults and even aged people can re- kofski et a1. 200 1a). One group that was severely
organize in response to imposed demands. While impaired recovered, while other patients with a
similar impairment did not recover at all. It is likely
that the decisive distinctive feature is the absence
* Correspondence to: Dr. R.I. Seitz, Department ofNeu- of residual function and consequently of somato-
rology Center, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf,
sensory feedback of the affected limb over a criti-
Moorenstrasse 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Fax: +49-
2 11-81-18485. cal time span in the non-recovering patients. This
E-mail: Seitz@n.~urologie.uni-duesseldorf.de hypothesis is supported by evidence from com-
249

32 tion from the partly compromised limb is critically


required for tuning the remaining network into
function as may be evident from passive move-
26 ments (Nelles et al. 1999). These data are corrobo-
rated further by the observation that there is a
20 posterior shift of the sensorimotor area in patients
with sensorimotor strokes (Rossini et al. 1998).
~
Such changes of cortical representations may in-
~'- 14 volve long-term potentiation (LTP) or enhanced
.eo synaptic efficiency. Using paired associated stimu-
lation of trans cranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
:E 8 and highly timed electrical median nerve stimula-
tion it was shown that motor evoked potentials
2 (MEPs) recorded from the abductorpollicis brevis
muscle are significantly increased compared to the
3 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 recording before the interventional paired stimu-
lation (Stefan et al. 2000). Preliminary data of a
Days after stroke collaborative study suggest that an increased acti-
vation area as measured with fMRI during individual
Fig. I. Recovery of motor functions after hemiparetic brain
infarction. Patients with a slight impairment, as indicated by thumb abductions is the neuroimaging correlate of
a mean motor score of8, recover rapidly within 30 days. For this fast occurring cortical plasticity.
comparison, patients with severe hemiplegia (mean motor
score greater than 20) show a more protracted recovery course
of many weeks. Note that patients with such a severe acute Temporal evolution
deficit may not recover at all. For details of the motor score
and the relation of recovery to brain lesion volume see
Binkofski et al. 2001a. In acute brain infarction, the location and extent
of impaired brain tissue perfusion and of changes
of tissue diffusion are of paramount importance
bined clinical and electrophysiological studies sug- for functional recovery, since they determine the
gesting that in addition to the degree of motor im- development ofthe manifest stroke lesion and, thus,
pairment the presence of somatosensory evoked to what degree the different mechanisms of cer-
potentials indicated good recovery (Feys et al. ebral reorganization may come into play subse-
2000). Likewise, deafferented monkeys who were quently (Seitz and Freund 1997).
not using the affected limb many weeks after in- In the subacute stage after brain infarction the
jury failed to recover (Taub et al. 1999). Con- mechanisms of cerebral plasticity include regres-
versely, animal experiments show an enlargement sion of perilesional dysfunction and recruitment
of the somatosensory representations during skill ofdistributed systems in both cerebral hemispheres.
recovery after focal lesions of the primary soma- These infarct induced changes can be monitored
tosensory cortex (Xerri et al. 1998). From these by neuroimaging and electrophysiological meas-
observations the concept was derived that the ani- ures and correspond to the concept of diaschisis
mals learned not to use the affected limb because (Witte et al. 2000). Functionally related pathways
of discomfort, stress and frustration when doing in either brain hemisphere have been shown to
so, but used the intact arm instead. This concept of contribute to recovery and to be recruited by re-learn-
'learned non-use' laid the ground for subsequent ing. Increasing evidence suggests that the human
therapy studies in severely impaired chronic human brain employs multiple, interconnected brain areas
stroke victims. There is good evidence to support for information processing and control of behavior.
the view that reafferent somatosensory informa- Brain diseases are expected to affect these networks
250

directly by interference and indirectly as a conse- MEP-ratio


quence of deficit compensation. Covariance analy- 2
ses applied to functional brain imaging data open 1,5
the opportunity to study neural networks and their
disease related changes in the human brain (Seitz et
al. 2001). A hypothesis driven, multivariate analy- 0,5
sis of resting regional cerebral metabolic data in
patients with infarctions ofthe motor cortex showed o
that motor recovery from hemiparesis was associ- -0,5 - t - - - - - - - , , - - - - - - - r - - - - - - ,
ated with a relative enhancement of interregional 20 40 60
-1
interactions in a cerebello-thalamocortical network.
Most important for recovery was the functional % of stimulator's output
coupling between the ipsilesional thalamus and the Fig. 2. Altered excitability after brain infarction in the contra-
contralesional cerebellum. Support for these data lesional motor cortex. Shown is the intracortical inhibition and
comes from categorical comparisons studying the excitation as tested by paired pulse TMS at interstimulus in-
decrease ofoxygen metabolism in frontomesial cor- terval of2 ms for different intensities of the subthreshold CS
tex and of glucose metabolism in the thalamus in in patients (triangle) and healthy volunteers (square). The CS
intensity is expressed as percentage of the stimulator's out-
hemiparesis with poor recovery (Seitz and Freund
put; the amplitude ofMEP elicited by the succeeding, condi-
1997; Iglesias et a1. 2000). In the chronic stage af- tioned suprathreshold magnetic stimulation are expressed as
ter stroke cross-modal recruitment of alternative ratio of the mean MEP amplitude evoked by five single test
strategies mostly involving the contralesional hemi- pulses. Different modulation of the MEPs between patients
sphere have been shown to engage preferentially and controls (2-way factorial ANOYA; CS intensity p < 0.005;
the visual cortex during sensorimotor activity as group x CS intensity p < 0.01).
demonstrated in congenital blind subjects and in
patients after stroke (Sadato et a1. 1998; Seitz et left hemispheric stimulation in 9 healthy right
a1. 2001). handed volunteers. As illustrated in Fig. 2, the size
of the test MEP was significantly influenced by
the intensity of the conditioning pulse (CS) and
Recovery mechanisms modulated differently in patients and normal vol-
unteers. At small intensities of CS (25-30% of
These types of large-scale reorganization appear maximal stimulator output), a reduction in the
to involve facilitatory and compensatory engage- conditioned test MEP amplitude was seen in both
ment of pre-existing, hitherto latent pathways. Evi- groups. In contrast, at higher stimulus intensities,
dence for this hypothesis comes from neuroreceptor patients and normal volunteers showed a different
studies and studies with TMS by which functional pattern: the conditioned test MEP amplitudes in-
systems of the human brain can be probed (Witte creased at a steeper rate in patients and exceeded
et a1. 2000). We wished to address the question the size of the MEP amplitude evoked by the single
whether the activity of excitatory and inhibitory in- test pulse. This facilitatory effect was not seen in
terneurons in the motor cortex contralateral to the the healthy subjects. These first results support the
affected hemisphere is disturbed in stroke patients. hypothesis that in the motor cortex the threshold for
Paired pulse TMS technique at short interstimulus activation of inhibitory interneurons is lower than
intervals allows the measurement of intracortical for excitatory interneurons (Ziemann et a1. 1996;
inhibition which probably is mediated by GABA- Chen et a1. 1998) and that changes in the excitabil-
ergic interneurons. In 12 stroke patients, we stud- ity of brain areas remote from a stroke lesion occur.
ied the motor cortex of the non-affected side using Interestingly, stroke patients may engage an al-
paired pulse TMS technique with an interstimulus ternative strategy for coping with a post-ischemic
interval of 2 ms. This was compared to results of neurological deficit. Similar observations were
251

made recently in monkeys with focal lesions of egies may improve recovery after brain infarction
motor cortex (Friel and Nudo 1998). Such an al- by tasks known to activate this structure.
ternative strategy is likely to activate the premotor
cortex, since premotor cortex plays a critical role
for coding motor acts (Rizzolatti et al. 1998). In References
particular, patients who have recovered from hemi-
paretic brain infarction were shown to engage pre- Binkofski, F., Dohle, C., Posse, S., Stephan, K.M., Hefter, H., Seitz,
motor cortex, both after subcortical as well as R.J. and Freund, H.-J. Human anterior intraparietal area sub-
serves prehension. A combined lesion and functional MRI acti-
cortical brain infarctions (Chollet and Weiller vation study. Neurology, 1998, 50: 1253-1259.
2000; Seitz et a1. 2000). In addition, an enhanced Binkofski, F.. Buccino, G., Dohle, C., Seitz, RJ., Freund, H.-J.
activation of prefrontal cortex was observed cor- Mirror agnosia and mirror ataxia constitute different parietal lobe
disorders. Ann. Neurol., 1999,46: 51--61.
responding to an enhanced cognitive load related Binkofski, F., Amunts, K., Stephan, K.M., Posse, S., Schorrnann,
to enhanced difficulty of task performance (Seitz T., Zilles, K. and Seitz, RJ. Broca's area subserves imagery of
et al, 2000). Two aspects are challenging in this motion: a combined cytoarchitectonic and MRI study. Hum.
Brain Mapp., 2000, 11: 273-285.
context and deserve further studies. First, there is
Binkofski, F.. Seitz, R.J., Hacklander, T., Pawelec, D., Mau, J. and
good evidence that lesions of the parietal cortex Freund, H.-J. The recovery of motor functions following hemi-
induce persistent deficits of well defined delicate paretic stroke: a clinical and MR-morphometric study. Cerebra-
motor functions such as the shaping of the hand vase. Dis., 2001a, I]: 273-281.
Binkofski, F" Seitz, R.J., Kunesch, E., Dohlc, e. and Freund, H.-J.
for prehension of objects, tactile object explora- Tactile apraxia. Unimodal apractic disorder of tactile object ex-
tion, mirror transformation (Binkofski et a1. 1998, ploration associated with parietal lobe lesions. Brain, 200 Ib,
1999, 2001 b). No comparable deficits were ob- 124: 132--144.
Chen, R., Tam, A., Butefisch, e.M., Corwell, B., Ziemann, U.,
served in frontal brain lesions, although highly Rothwell, J. and Cohen, L.G. Intracortical inhibition and facili-
organized parietal-premotor circuits have been iden- tation in different representations of the human motor cortex. J
tified and ascribed to different subfunctions of sen- Neurophysiol., 1998,80: 2870-2881.
sorimotor activity. Apparently, parietal functions Chollet, F. and Weiller, e. Recovery of neurological function. In:
J.C. Mazziotta, A.W. Toga and RS.1. Frackowiak (Eds.), Brain
have a highly specialized modular organization and, Mapping. The Disorders. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2000:
therefore, are lateralized precluding substitution by 588-597.
the contralesional homologue area whereas the pre- Feys, H., Van Hees, 1., Bruyninckx, E, Mercelis, R. and De Weerdt,
W. Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in pre-
motor cortex has, a more bilateral organization pat- dicting arm recovery after a stroke. J Neural. Neurosurg. Psy-
tern. The latter seems to be supported by the imaging chiatry, 2000, 68: 323-331.
data both in healthy volunteers and in patients who Friel, K.M. and Nudo, R.J. Recovery of motor function after focal
cortical injury in primates: compensatory movement patterns
recovered from brain lesions such as brain infarc-
used during rehabilitative training. Somatosens Mot. Res., 1998,
tion (Chollet and Weiller 2000). A further surpris- 153: 173-189.
ing observation is the preponderance of dorsal Gerardin, E, Sirigu, A., Lehericy, S., Poline, J.B., Gaymard, B.,
premotor cortical activations in motor activity in Marsault, e., Agid, Y. and Le Bihan, D. Partially overlapping
neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb.
stroke victims while the inferior parts of the pre- Cortex, 2000,10: 1093-1104.
motor cortex was not active. This part of the pre- Herholz, K. and Heiss, W.-D. Functional imaging correlates of re-
motor cortex is very much involved in movement covery after stroke in humans. J Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.,
2000,12: 1619-1631.
ideation and movement observation probably cor- Iglesias, S., Marchal, G., Viader, F. and Baron, J.e. Delayed intra-
responding to the premotor cortical sub-area F5 hemispheric remote hypometabolism. Correlations with early
which was shown in primates to accommodate so- recovery after stroke. Cerebrovase. Dis. 2000,10: 391-402.
Kaas, J.H. and Florence, S.L. Mechanisms of reorganization in sen-
called mirror neurons (Parsons et al. 1995; Binkofski
sory systems of primates after peripheral nerve injury. In: H.-J.
et a1. 2000; Gerardin et a1. 2001). These neurons are Freund, B.A. Sabel and O.w. Witte (Eds.), Brain Plasticity.
active both during observation and actual perform- Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA, 1997: 147-158.
ance of movements thus being candidate structures Nelles, G., Spiekermann, G., Jueptner, M., Leonhardt, G., Muller,
S., Gerhard, H. and Diener, H.e. Evolution of functional reor-
for movement imitation. We are now testing the hy- ganization in hemiplegic stroke: a serial positron emission to-
pothesis that imaginative-cognitive learning strat- mographic activation study. Ann. Neurol., 1999,46: 901-909.
252
Parsons, L.M., Fox, P.T., Downs, J.H., Glass, T., Hirsch, T.B., Mar- in sensorimotor disturbances. Brain Res. Bull., 2001, 54: 299-
tin, e.e., Jerabek, P.A. and Lancaster, J.L. Use of implicit mo- 305.
tor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Stefan, K., Kunesch, E., Cohen, L.G., Benecke, R. and Classen, J.
Nature, 1995, 375: 54-58. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired as-
Rizzolatti, G., Luppino, G. and Matelli, M. The organization of the sociative stimulation. Brain, 2000,123: 572-584.
cortical motor system: new concepts. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Taub, E., Uswatte, G. and Pidikiti, R. Constraint-induced move-
Neurophysiol., 1998, 106: 283-296. ment therapy: a new family of techniques with broad applica-
Rossini, P.M., Tecchic, F., Pizzella, V., Lupoi, D., Cassetta, E. and tion to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review. 1. Rehabil.
Pasqualetti, P. On the reorganization of sensory hand areas after Res, Dev., 1999,36: 237-251.
mono-hemispheric lesion: a functional (MEG)/anatomical (MRI) Xerri, e., Merzenich, M.M., Peterson, B.E. and Jenkins, W. Plastic-
integrative study. Brain Res., 1998,782: 153-166. ity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor
Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Deiber, M.P., Ibanez, skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. 1. Neurophysial.,
V and Hallett, M. Neural networks for Braille reading by the 1998,79:2119-2148.
blind. Brain, 1998,121: 1213-1229. Witte, D.W., Bidmon, H.-J., Schiene, K., Redecker, e. and Hage-
Seitz, R.J. and Freund, H.-J. Plasticity of the human motor cortex. mann, G. Functional differentiation of multiple perilesional zones
In: H.-J. Freund, B.A. Sabel and D.W. Witte (Eds.), Brain Plas- after focal cerebral ischemia. 1. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 2000,
ticity. Adv. Neurol., 1997,73: 321-333. 20: 1149-1165.
Seitz, R.J., Stephan, K.M. and Binkofski, F. Control of action as Ziemann, U., Lonnecker, S., Steinhoff, B.J. and Paulus, W. Effects
mediated by the human fronta/lobe. Exp. Brain Res., 2000, /33: of different antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in
71-80. humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Ann, Neurol.,
Seitz, R.J., Knorr, D., Azari, N.P. and Weder, B. Cerebral networks 1996,40: 367-378.

You might also like