Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/297827838
Design and Analysis of a Connecting Rod for the 117kw Six Cylinders
Turbocharged Diesel Engine
CITATIONS READS
0 5,561
2 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Transient Thermal Analysis of the Turbine Blade Transient Thermal Analysis of the Turbine Blade View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Himam Saheb Shaik on 12 March 2016.
Abstract--- The main objective of this work was to explore gudgeon pin. The big end of the connecting rod is usually
weight reduction opportunities for forged steel connecting rod made split into two halves. The split cap is fastened to the big
in Ashok Leyland Bharat Stage-II engines. This has end with two cap bolts. The bearing shells are made up of
entailed performing a detailed load analysis. An optimization steel, brass or bronze with a thin lining about 0.75 mm of
study was performed on a steel forged connecting rod with a white metal or Babbitt metal. In this subject, 412 Turbo-
consideration for improvement in weight and production cost. Charged air cooled engine’s power intensity ratio is 0.24, thus
The introduction of piston cooling nozzles in AL engines piston cooling is necessary .This is achieved by piston-cooling
provides scope for eliminating the oil hole in the connecting nozzles (cooling of piston through a separate jet from oil
rod and thereby reducing the size 'of the 'I' section. gallery to Dissipate combustion heat and to control the piston
Furthermore, the existing connecting rod can be replaced with ring sticking).
a new connecting rod with modified I-section. Literature
The optimization carried out here, however, is not in the
survey suggests cyclic loads comprised of static tensile and
true mathematical sense, since while reducing mass,
compressive loads are often used for design and optimization
manufacturing feasibility and cost reduction are integral parts
of connecting rods. However, in this study weight optimization
of the optimization. In Addition, software used in this work
is performed under a cyclic load comprising dynamic tensile imposed restrictions in performing optimization under fatigue
load and static compressive load as the two extreme loads. life constraint.
Therefore, this work has further dealt with two subjects, first,
the connecting rod modeling, force calculations and the
II. THESIS STRUCTURE
second is the finite element analysis and also deals with
Optimization of Gudgeon pin. The thesis comprises eleven parts. The first part is a review
of the literature on Connecting rod optimization .This survey
Keywords--- Finite Element Analysis Connecting Rod by is focused on the Work carried out on both forged steel and
using Different Design Software’s like Pro-e, Ansys powder metallurgy Connecting rod. The second part provides
Software’s a detailed load analysis and force calculations of a forged steel
connecting rod. The fourth part provides force calculations of
a forged steel connecting rod .The fifth part explains the Finite
I. INTRODUCTION Element Analysis of the Connecting rod Sixth and seventh
part describes the optimization procedure for gudgeon pin and
T HE engines connecting rods are a high volume
production, and usually manufactured by drop forging
process. The material mostly used for connecting rods varies
connecting rod. The sample component development,
conclusions drawn from this project and a list of
recommendations for further work are presented in later
from mild carbon steels (0.35 to 0.45 % carbons) to alloy
Chapters.
steels (Chrome Nickel to Chrome molybdenum steels). The
functions of connecting rod includes, providing a connecting
III. OBJECTIVES AND OUTLINE
link between Piston and Crankshaft to convert the
reciprocating motion to rotary motion and conveying A. Literature Survey
lubricating oil from Crankshaft (big end) to Piston pin (small The connecting rod is subjected to a complex state of
end) through its central oil hole. loading. It undergoes high cyclic loads of the order of 108 to
Connecting rods are generally subjected to two types of 109cycles, which range from high compressive loads due to
inertia forces, one due to masses and friction induced by the combustion, to high tensile loads due to inertia. Therefore,
reciprocating parts and other, due to the gas load generated durability of this component is of critical importance. Due to
from combustion process. The small end of the connecting rod these factors, the connecting rod has been the topic of research
is provided with a bush of phosphor bronze and connected to for different aspects such as production technology, materials,
performance simulation, fatigue, etc.
Shaik Himam Saheb, Assistant Profess, B.Tech, M.Tech, Singareni [1] Adila Afzal and Fatemi conducted a comparative study
Collieries Polytechnic Singareni Collieries Polytechnic, Adilabad District, for the Fatigue properties and life predictions of forged steel
Mancherial-504302. E-mail: himam.mech@gmail.com
P. Sampath Kumar, Assistant Profess, B.Tech, M.Tech, Singareni and PM connecting rods. Both the materials are obtained from
Collieries Polytechnic Singareni Collieries Polytechnic, Adilabad District, specimen testing and then used in life predictions using the S-
Mancherial-504302. E-mail: sampath.pendekatla@gmail.com N approach.
A. Ramesh, Assistant Profess, B.Tech, M.Tech, Christhu Jyothi Institute
of Technology and Science (CJITS), Jangaon, Warangal, AP, India. E-mail:
ramesh340mech@gmail.com
Given Data’s:
Piston Diameter (d1) =107.277 mm
Fig 1: The Fatigue failure locations on (a) Forged steel and Stroke Length(L) = 120.65 mm
(b) PM connecting rods(Courtesy: Adila Afzal and Fatemi Crank Radius(r) = (L/2)= 60.325 mm
[1])The objective of this work was to optimize the weight and
Length of connecting rod (ℓ)=223.558 mm
cost of a forged steel connecting rod, to a safe level of factor
of safety in Ashok Leyland Bharat Stage II engines. This Ratio (ℓ/r)= 3.70
weight reduction project is being taken up, since; the Maximum Explosion Pressure (Pmax=12.236 N/mm2
introduction of piston cooling nozzle which not only cools the
overheating piston but also lubricates the piston pin. Thereby, Engine Speed (N) = 2400 rpm
it provides a scope for eliminating the central oil hole, and Mass of Reciprocating Parts(M)= 3.154 Kg
reducing the ‘I’ section size.
Web Thickness (t)= 5.08 mm
Optimization begins with identifying the correct load
conditions and magnitudes. The idea behind optimizing is to Radius of Gyration (E)= 2.06 x 105 N/mm2
retain just as much strength is needed. Commercial software’s STEP 1:
such as Pro\Engineer, ADAMS-View, and I-DEAS Analysis Yield Strength of connecting Rod (σ Y) = 570 N/mm2
can be used to obtain the
Tensile Strength of connecting Rod (σ u) =770 N/mm2
Variation of quantities such as angular velocity, angular
STEP 2:
acceleration, and load. However, usually the worst case load is
Load due to Gas pressure (FG) = (π/4 * d12 * Pmax)
considered in the design process.
= (π/4 * 107.277 2 * 12.236) = 110600.3997 N
Literature review suggests that investigators use maximum
STEP 3:
inertia load, inertia load, or inertia load of the piston assembly
For an I-section A = 11t2, Kxx = 1.78t.
mass as one extreme load corresponding to the tensile load,
and firing load or compressive gas load corresponding to Therefore, A = 283.87 mm2 & Kxx = 9.0424 mm
maximum torque as the other extreme design load Shank Design
corresponding to the compressive load. Inertia load is a time Flange Thickness = t
varying quantity and can refer to the inertia load of the piston,
or of the connecting rod. Depth of section = 5t
From the literature review, it is clear that maximum Width of section = 4t
stresses act at the connecting rod column bottom end and does Area of section (A) = 11t2.,Ixx = 1/12 (BH3 – bh3
not occur at TDC. The maximum bending stress at the column
center is about 25% of the maximum stress at that location. =1/12 [(1t) x (5t2) – (3t) x (3t3)] = 419t2 / 12
However, to obtain the bending stress variation over the Iyy = 1/12 (2t*B3 + ht3)= 1/12 [(2t * 4t3) + (3t * t3)]= 131/12 t4
connecting rod length, or to know the stress at critical
locations such as the transition regions of the connecting rod, a K2xx = Ixx / A = 419t2 / (12*11t2)
detailed analysis is needed. As a result, for the forged steel K2xx = 3.18 t2 …………………… (i)
connecting rod, a detailed load analysis has to be investigated 2
K yy = Iyy / A = 131t2 / (12*11t2),K2yy = 0.995 t2
by a static FEA to capture the stress variations.
STEP 4:
IV. CALCULATION OF FACTOR OF SAFETY Rankine’s formula:
Aim: To calculate existing factor of safety of the The buckling load (WB) of the component can be
connecting rod using Rankine’s formula in an Excel Spread calculated
sheet. WB = ((σc * A) / {1+a [ℓ/Kxx2]}……………… (ii)
Where,
σc (Direct compressive stress + Bending Stress) = 770
N/mm2
a = 1/ 7500 constant, ℓ = 223.558 mm, Kxx = 9.0424 mm crank end and piston end and to determine forces
A1, I-section area with hole = 859.550 mm 2 perpendicular to connecting rod.
F.O.S without hole (n1) = 5.7371, F.O.S with hole (n2) = Length of connecting rod (ℓ)= 223.5 mm
5.533 Maximum Explosion Pressure (Pmax)= 120 bar
The above F.O.S values fits only to the I-Section of the Engine Speed (N) = 2400 rpm
Connecting rod.
Mass of Reciprocating Parts (M)
V. PARAMETRIC MODELING OF CONNECTING ROD M = {Weight of piston + Weight of Gudgeon pin + Weigh
A solid model of the connecting rod was generated using Piston rings +/3 weight of connecting rod = 2.358 + 1/3
Pro/Engineer Wildfire2.0. Due to the symmetry of the (2.394) = 3.154Kg
geometry, the component was first half modeled. The model
Mass of Connecting Rod: 2.392 kg
was designed without forging flash, bolts, and crank or pin
hole bearings, as these details are not expected to have any Ratio (ℓ/r) :3.70Ultimate strength : 770 N/mm2
significant influence on the obtained results at the critical Yield strength 570 N/mm2 Hardness: 241 to 285 BHN
regions (i.e. failure locations, simplification of the model.
Different modeling techniques have been adopted on modeling Material Specification DIN 17200 41CR 4STEEL
of the existing connecting rod. Thus, a final optimized Connecting rod model : In step file, part file formats
geometry of connecting rod has been created using assembly Piston & Piston pin model:In step file, part file formats
cut procedure from the Pro/Engineer.
C. Modeling Process
The step-by-step modeling and analysis procedure of a
connecting rod is described below:
1. Creating a model, setting units and gravity
The assembled 3D model of connecting rod, piston, piston
pin part files are being imported to ADAMS physical model
environment through Step / iges file format.
2. Creating parts and joints
The connecting rod is connected to the piston pin with a
revolute joint; similarly, the either ends of pins are connected
Fig. 2: Parametric Model of Existing Connecting Rod to the piston using a lock joint to prevent the movement in all
directions.
VI. FORCE CALCULATIONS - ADAMS/VIEWER
The Big end side of connecting rod is connected to a bar
A. Introduction link with a spline defined revolute joint, i.e., the movement of
The Automatic Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems connecting rod depends upon the Pressure Vs Crank angle
(ADAMS/Viewer) is used in the field of Mechanical System diagram.
Simulation (MSS) to simulate both large and small-scale
motion of mechanical systems. These motions are induced by This spline curve is defined by a set of xy axis values.
the action of applied forces or excitations that act upon the Other end of the bar link is provided a revolute joint.
system. 3. Running and animating a simulation
This package allows to import geometry from most major The maximum gas load, taken as a point load on the piston
CAD systems or to build a solid model of the mechanical surface at C.G. axis. Now, the force vectors are made visible
system from scratch. A full library of joints and constraints is (Both the axial force at top and bottom).
available for creating articulated mechanisms. Once the virtual
prototype is complete, Adams checks the model and then runs
simultaneous equations for kinematics, static, quasi-static, and
dynamic simulations. Results are viewable as graph, data
plots, reports, or colorful animations. This package allows
users to determine the magnitude of the loads acting on the
connecting rod at any position of time with respect to crank
angle rotations, to determine forces acting due to the cylinder
pressure, o determine forces acting along connecting rod at
Observations
Small end constrained fully and a resultant load of
8.127kN at an angle of 34.660 to vertical (Fy = 6.685kN, Fx = Figure7.1: von Mises stress distribution plot with static
4.62kN) tensile load of 8.127kN at an angle 34.660 to vertical (Fy =
6.685kN, Fx = 4.622kN) at the crank end while the pin end
It can be observed that big end bottom and small end top
was restrain
almost of zero stress due to rigidity.
Figure 7.2: Displacement plot with static tensile load of
Maximum displacement of 1.1 mm observed for the given 8.127kN at an angle 34.660 to vertical (Fy = 6.685kN, Fx =
constraint
4.622kN) at the crank end while the pin end was restrain Yield
stress = 59.6 kg/mm2
B. Current Design - Connecting Rod without OILHOLE
Below table describes the comparative chart of change in
Boundary Condition I Maximum stress of 21.9 kgf/mm2
the F.O.S values for the existing and optimized connecting
observed near the web and 9 kgf/mm2 observed near the hole
rod.
at small en
Optimization of Gudgeon Pin
The gudgeon pin (which connects the piston to the
connecting rod in a conventional internal combustion engine,
ICE) is subjected to a combination of shearing and bending
loads. There will inevitably be some deformation of the
bushes that hold the gudgeon pin in both the piston and the
connecting rod. Considering the maximum loading conditions
several iterations piston pin have been completely optimized.
Figure 7(a) von Mises stress distribution plot with Based on pin diameters, the existing gudgeon pin (15 cr Ni 6)
compressive load of 95.74 kN at Piston pin end while the yield strength is 165 kg/mm2.
crank end was restrained
Existing Piston Pin – The existing pin has 1.6” diameter
Figure7 (b): Displacement plots with compressive load of and the F.O.S values are described below.
95.74 kN at piston pin end while the crank end was restrained.
Von Mises stress: 116 kg/mm2
Observations F.O.S: 1.422
Big end fully constrained and a vertical load of 95.74 kN.
It can be observed that big end bottom and small end top
almost of zero stress due to rigid
Maximum displacement of 0.1 mm observed for the given
constraint
Maximum stress of 32.3 kgf /mm2 observed near the small
end, may be due to rigid connection given to apply load at Figure 8: Existing Gudgeon pin of 1.6” Diameter
small end, that need to be verified by defining a contact. Finite Element Analysis of Gudgeon Pin
Near the oil hole removed region small end stress of 24.5 kgf/ The objective of FEA was to investigate stress and
mm2 Near the web, stress is around 16.7 kgf/mm2 displacements experienced by the Gudgeon pin. From the
Observations resulting stress contours, the state of stress, as well as stress
concentration factors can be obtained and consequently used
for life predictions. Piston pin is subjected to three different
kinds of loadings considering the static analysis (Axial load, Connecting rod F.O.S Vs Different I-Sections
Angular Load and Experimental Load).Similarly the resultant
1.65
load of 669 kgf is applied and at last the experimental value of